EID Home | Ahead of Print | Past Issues | EID Search | Contact Us | Announcements | Suggested Citation | Submit Manuscript

PDF Version | Comments | Email this article

Letter

Pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 Spread, France

Marie-Laure Quilici,* Annick Robert-Pillot,* Jessica Picart,* and Jean-Michel Fournier*
*Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

Suggested citation for this article

To the Editor: Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a halophilic bacterium that occurs naturally in aquatic environments worldwide. It causes one of the most severe forms of gastroenteritis and is the leading cause of seafood-associated bacterial gastroenteritis in the world, often associated with the consumption of raw or undercooked seafood. Since 1996, the incidence of V. parahaemolyticus infections has increased dramatically. V. parahaemolyticus strains previously associated with only sporadic cases of gastroenteritis have caused large-scale outbreaks in North America and epidemics in India, Southeast Asia, and Japan (1). This increase in incidence appears to be related to the emergence of a new clone, belonging to the O3:K6 serovar, which has pandemic potential. This clone was named the new O3:K6 clone to distinguish it from strains belonging to this serovar isolated before 1996, which are less pathogenic. We report the first evidence for the presence in France and suggest the presence and persistence in French coastal areas of this pandemic O3:K6 serovar, which is indistinguishable from the O3:K6 clone isolated in Bangladesh in 1996.

We analyzed 13 clinical isolates of V. parahaemolyticus collected in France from 1997 to 2004 and sent to the National Reference Center (Table). All isolates were characterized by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the genes encoding the virulence-associated hemolysins, thermostable-direct hemolysin, and thermostatable-related hemolysin (2), and 2 other genetic markers, toxRS and orf8 (1,3). We also carried out molecular typing by various methods, including ribotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and arbitrarily primed PCR. Strains were initially identified by biochemical and cultural methods. Strain identities were confirmed by species-specific R72H PCR (4). The slide agglutination test was performed to determine whether the isolates belonged to the O3:K6 serovar. Two pandemic strains of the new O3:K6 clone and 1 strain of the old O3:K6 clone were included as external controls.

Five strains were identified as V. parahaemolyticus O3:K6 by slide agglutination test. With the exception of the strain referred to as old O3:K6 clone, all O3:K6 strains studied, whether isolated in France or included as controls, were positive for tdh, toxRS, and orf8 genes. Likewise, all strains, except the old O3:K6 clone, produced BglI rRNA gene restriction patterns identical to those of a major R4 ribotype previously described (5) and were genetically indistinguishable by arbitrarily primed PCR analysis. With the exception of the strain belonging to the old O3:K6 clone, the PFGE-typeable O3:K6 strains, despite having slightly different NotI patterns that reflect genetic rearrangement, clearly belonged to a single clone.

Until recently, V. parahaemolyticus caused only sporadic diarrhea and was never associated with a pandemic. The epidemiology of this organism changed abruptly after the new O3:K6 strains appeared in 1996. The spread of this serotype signaled the beginning of the first V. parahaemolyticus pandemic. Because the pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus O3:K6 isolates in France are derived from the new O3:K6 clone initially described in Bangladesh, this population likely was transported here in the same manner as V. parahaemolyticus O3:K6 was introduced into US coastal waters (6) and V. cholerae serogroup O1 was introduced into Gulf Coast waters in 1991 (7).

Epidemiologic information was collected from all patients with a standardized questionnaire concerning clinical history, symptoms, and seafood consumption. Responses indicated that some persons affected by V. parahaemolyticus O3:K6 had eaten local seafood harvested in uncontrolled areas. Furthermore, some had eaten seafood harvested in the same place several years apart. This provides evidence that pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus is present and suggests that it can persist in the French coastal environment.

The consumption of raw and lightly cooked seafood is increasing, as is the number of susceptible persons, which causes concern that the incidence of V. parahaemolyticus infections in Europe will increase. Monitoring this foodborne illness is difficult because only cases involving severe gastroenteritis are reported. Estimates are that only 1 in 20 cases of bloody diarrhea and only 1 in 38 cases of nonbloody diarrhea are reported in the United States (8). In France, the official surveillance authority estimated that the number of cases reported by the National Reference Center was representative of severe Vibrio infections. Making Vibrio isolations and infections reportable could help us estimate the true incidence of the disease and could improve the surveillance of V. parahaemolyticus infections.

Detecting the pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus O3:K6 in France, and previous results showing that pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus strains are present in French coastal areas at a higher frequency than was usually reported (9), may provide an early warning. Much effort is required to develop V. parahaemolyticus prevention strategies. Educating consumers about basic principles of food safety, particularly storage conditions, is an important component of prevention. Lack of continuous refrigeration from harvest to consumption may have contributed to these infections. The number of bacteria in seafood contaminated with only a small number of V. parahaemolyticus organisms can reach the infectious dose, thought to be >10⁵ CFU per gram according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (10), within a few hours when left in a warm place. Another component of prevention is the improvement of microbial surveillance by systematic testing for pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus isolates in the environment and in locally produced and imported seafood.

Acknowledgments

We thank Alain Guénolé for excellent technical assistance. Strains of the pandemic O3:K6 new clone and of the old O3:K6 clone were provided by G. B. Nair and by M. Nishibuchi, respectively. The acetyl aminofluorene (AAF)–labeled RNA probe and the anti-AAF mouse monoclonal antibody were prepared and purified by Jean-Luc Guesdon.

The Institut Pasteur and the Ministry of Health provided financial support.

References

1. Matsumoto C, Okuda J, Ishibashi M, Iwanaga M, Garg P, Rammamurthy T, et al. Pandemic spread of an O3:K6 clone of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and emergence of related strains evidenced by arbitrarily primed PCR and toxRS sequence analyses. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:578–85.
2. Nishibuchi M, Kaper JB. Thermostable direct hemolysin gene of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a virulence gene acquired by a marine bacterium. Infect Immun. 1995;63:2093–9.
3. Myers ML, Panicker G, Bej AK. PCR detection of a newly emerged pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 pathogen in pure cultures and seeded waters from the Gulf of Mexico. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:2194–200.
4. Robert-Pillot A, Guénolé A, Fournier JM. Usefulness of R72H PCR assay for differentiation between Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio alginolyticus species: validation by DNA-DNA hybridization. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002;215:1–6.
5. Bag PK, Nandi S, Bhadra RK, Ramamurthy T, Bhattacharya SK, Nishibuchi M, et al. Clonal diversity among recently emerged strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 associated with pandemic spread. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:2354–7.
6. Daniels NA, Ray B, Easton A, Marano N, Kahn E, McShan A L, et al. Emergence of a new Vibrio parahaemolyticus serotype in raw oysters—A prevention quandary. JAMA. 2000;284:1541–5.
7. McCarthy SA, Khambaty FM. International dissemination of epidemic Vibrio cholerae by cargo ship ballast and other nonpotable waters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994;60:2597–601.
8. Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McGaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, et al. Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis.1999;5:607–25.
9. Robert-Pillot A, Guénolé A, Lesne J, Delesmont R, Fournier JM, Quilici ML. Occurrence of the tdh and trh genes in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates from waters and raw shellfish collected in two French coastal areas and from seafood imported into France. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;91:319–25.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections associated with eating raw oysters—Pacific Northwest, 1997. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998;47:457–62.

Suggested citation for this article:
Quilici M-L, Robert-Pillot A, Picart J, Fournier J-M. Pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 spread, France [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2005 Jul [date cited]. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol11no07/04-1008.htm

EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page posted June 2, 2005
This page last reviewed June 21, 2005

Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal
National Center for Infectious Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention