Status: The State has begun to implement
comprehensive unbundling for its residential gas customers. |
Overview: Competition for natural gas supply has
been allowed in Pennsylvania since enactment of the Natural Gas Choice and
Competition Act in 1999. However, as of January 1, 2008, according to the
Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate, only 6 percent of the State's
residential customers purchase natural gas from alternative suppliers,
down substantially from the 10 percent in December
2001. Furthermore, the State Public Utility Commission (PUC) has
determined that effective competition in the retail natural gas supply
market does not exist on a statewide basis at this time. In its report to
the General Assembly in October 2005, which was mandated after 5 years of
deregulation, the PUC concluded that the number of suppliers and buyers in
choice programs across the State was insufficient for effective
competition and that the marketplace “lacks accurate and timely price
signals.” The report noted that suppliers felt that substantial barriers
to market entry exist because of the local distribution companies’ (LDCs)
differing and high security requirements, excessive and varying penalties
for non-delivery, differing nomination and delivery requirements, and
misleading price comparisons.
Because of the report’s findings, the PUC
reconvened stakeholders to consider what actions should be
taken to encourage competition on a statewide level, such as changes to
market structure and operation and to regulatory and legislative
guidelines (incentives). A PUC-led task force, known as SEARCH (Stakeholders Exploring Avenues for Removing Competition Hurdles), was formed that includes representatives from LDCs, marketers, and residential, commercial, and industrial consumers. The group is examining issues related to mandatory capacity assignments, purchase of receivables, consumer education, consumer protection rules, and costs of retail supply services and also considering possible incentives that might result in LDCs exiting the merchant function. A final report of the group's recommendations is expected by the end of 2008.
Customers in five LDCs’ service areas (Columbia Gas of
Pennsylvania, Inc., Dominion Peoples, Equitable Gas Company, PECO Gas Company, and UGI
Gas Utilities, Inc.) are choosing to buy gas from marketers at this time. The first three
of these LDCs had conducted extensive pilot choice programs prior to the
legislation. At a hearing in September 2004, the consumer advocate noted
that nearly all the switching to third-party suppliers has occurred in
areas that had extensive pilot programs in place before the choice
legislation was enacted. During these pilot programs, customers who
switched to marketers were exempted from paying a 5-percent gross receipts
tax. However, this advantage was eliminated with passage of the choice
legislation, which abolished the tax as of January 1, 2000. The consumer
advocate also noted that participation in choice programs may be hindered
by the difficulty in tracking the “price to compare” since it changes
quarterly and the sometimes long period (up to 48 days or more) it can
take for a switch to occur.
All marketers must be licensed by the
PUC in order to provide natural gas service in Pennsylvania. As of December 2007, 26 marketers were licensed to serve residential customers in the
State, but only 5 companies were enrolling new customers. |
EIA State Data: In 2006, Pennsylvania had 2,605,782 residential and 231,540 commercial customers who consumed 206 and 130 billion cubic feet of natural gas, respectively. The average prices paid for natural gas purchased from local distribution companies and marketers by residential and commercial customers were $16.45 and $14.30 per thousand cubic feet, respectively. |
Eligibility and Participation in Retail Choice
Programs: Retail unbundling in Pennsylvania began in November 1996
with the implementation of pilot programs by Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania
(August 1996) and Equitable Gas Company (September 1996). Approximately
25,000 residential and small commercial customers were eligible to
participate in these early programs. In 1997, three additional LDCs
initiated customer choice programs (PG Energy, Inc., National Fuel Gas
Distribution Corp., and People's Natural Gas Company, now doing business as Dominion Peoples). As of December
2007, about 1.6 million residential customers have access to competitive
suppliers and about 160,033 have enrolled in choice programs, down from 179,000 in December 2006, 165,000 in December 2005, and 181,000 in
December 2004.
|
Eligibility and Participation by Customer Class, December 2007
Customer Type |
2006 Customer Total |
Eligible December 2007 |
Participating December
2007 |
Total |
Percent
of Customers |
Total |
Percent
of Eligible |
Percent
of 2006 Customer Total |
Residential |
2,605,782 |
2,582,841 |
100 |
160,033 |
6.2 |
6.1 |
Commercial |
231,540 |
231,540 |
100 |
21,439 |
9.3 |
9.3 |
Total |
2,837,322 |
2,814,381 |
100 |
181,472 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
Sources: 2006 Customer Total and Estimated Commercial
Participation: Energy Information Administration, Natural Gas Annual 2006 (October 2007). Residential Eligibility and Participation: Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate (January 2008).
| |
|
Residential Customer Eligibility and Participation by Local Distribution Company, January 1, 2008
Local Distribution
Company |
Number of Residential
Customers |
Eligible
|
Participating |
Percent Participating |
Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania |
373,868 |
54,647 |
14.6 |
Dominion Peoples |
306,685 |
89,670 |
29.2 |
Equitable Gas Company |
239,393 |
12,482 |
5.2 |
PECO Gas Corporation |
439,840 |
702 |
0.2 |
UGI Gas Utilities |
292,587 |
2,532 |
0.9 |
Other (6) |
930,468 |
0 |
0 |
Total |
2,582,841 |
160,033 |
6.2 |
Source: Pennsylvania Office of Consumer
Advocate (January 2008). | |
Regulatory and Legislative Actions
on Retail Unbundling
Summary: The Pennsylvania General
Assembly passed the Natural Gas Choice and Competition Act in June 1999,
which called for statewide unbundling of the natural gas industry to begin
on November 1, 1999, and be completed by July 2000. It directed natural
gas distribution companies to file restructuring plans with the
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission that include provisions for
supplier of last resort, universal service for low-income customers, and
energy conservation. The PUC formulated regulations to implement the
legislation using the input from working groups to deal with safety and
reliability, customer information disclosure, standards of conduct, and
consumer education. The PUC also formulated regulations concerning the
licensing of natural gas suppliers. According to the schedule set by the
PUC in July 1999, four LDCs were to file their restructuring plans in
August 1999, two in October, three in December, and one in February 2000.
Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania's restructuring plan was approved in December
1999, and the other LDC plans were approved during 2000.
The
Natural Gas Choice and Competition Act specified that after July 1, 2004,
the PUC is to initiate an investigation or other proceeding to evaluate
the competitiveness of natural gas supply services in the State and report
its findings to the General Assembly. If the market is not sufficiently
competitive, the PUC is to reconvene the stakeholders to consider
measures, including legislative, for encouraging competition.
The
PUC began its investigation in May 2004 and submitted its report to the
General Assembly in October 2005. The report concluded that the number of
suppliers and buyers in choice programs across the State was insufficient
for effective competition and that the marketplace “lacks accurate and
timely price signals.” The report also noted that, according to suppliers,
substantial barriers to market entry exist because of the LDCs’ differing
and high security requirements, excessive and varying penalties for
non-delivery, differing nomination and delivery requirements, and
misleading price comparisons. Because of the report’s findings, the PUC
called on stakeholders to come together by the end of 2005 to consider
what actions should be taken to encourage competition on a statewide
level. A final report of the group's recommendations is expected by the end of 2008. |
Regulatory and Legislative Actions
Legislation |
10/07 |
Special Legislative Session on Energy Policy. Proposed House Bill 40 would provide for low-interest loans to utilities to replace deficient and aging pipeline facilities. House Bill 41 would give the PUC authority to mandate acquisition of Philadelphia Gas Works (PGW) by a capable public utility if considered necessary. It would also establish a distribution surcharge for all LDCs in the State, with a special surcharge provision for PGW. |
|
12/04 |
Responsible Utility Consumer Protection Act (Senate Bill 677). The Act amended Title 66 by adding Chapter 14 (sections 1401-1418), which is intended to
protect responsible bill paying customers from rate increases attributable to the
uncollectible accounts of customers that can afford to pay their bills but choose not to
pay. The legislation is applicable to electric distribution companies, water distribution
companies, and larger natural gas distribution companies (annual
operating income in excess of $6 million). It requires the PUC to report to the
General Assembly every 2 years as to the degree to which the law's requirements are being implemented; the effect upon the utilities' cash flow, uncollectible levels,
and collections; the level of access to utility services by residential customers; and the effect upon the level of consumer complaints and mediations. The report may also
contain recommendations about legislative or
other changes. |
|
06/99 |
Natural Gas Choice and Competition
Act (HB 1331). Provides for restructuring of the
natural gas industry so that consumers can choose their own gas
supplier. The act also deletes a 5.1-percent gross receipts tax on
gas utility sales, effective 1/1/2000. A 6-percent "sales" tax will
remain applicable to certain nonresidential customers. LDCs must
file restructuring plans that unbundle all natural gas supply
services and that specify system reliability standards and capacity
contract mitigation guidelines. LDCs must also specify provisions
for billing, dispute resolution, customer information, slamming
prevention, etc. LDCs can continue merchant services and their
affiliates can participate as marketers, abiding by code of conduct
rules (interim rules adopted 11/18/99). Until 7/1/2002, an LDC can
assign, release, or transfer capacity to licensed gas suppliers who
in turn must accept the existing contract terms if they serve
customers on the LDC's system. After 7/1/2002, the PUC can prevent
assignments if it considers it warranted. Rates charged by LDCs are
frozen until 2001, but LDCs can request permission to capitalize and
defer costs over an "appropriate" period. LDCs can recover all costs
incurred under transportation pilot programs approved before 2/1/99.
Costs incurred under these pilots through 10/31/04 may be recovered
if the volumetric charge does not exceed 1% of the LDC's approved
volumetric charge for residential sales service. In 5 years (2004),
the PUC is to evaluate the competitiveness of natural gas supply
services in the State and report its findings to the General
Assembly. If the market is not sufficiently competitive, further
actions will be considered.
|
Regulatory
Action |
12/07 |
New Case and Document Management System. The system will permit electronic filings, which will require PUC procedural changes. Proposed revisions were published on Nov. 17, 2007, with comments due by Jan. 16, 2008. |
|
09/07 |
PUC Rejected Philadelphia Gas Works' (PGW) Request to Remove Capacity Release Credits and Off-System Sales Margins from the PGW Rate. The PUC approved an increase in residential rates but rejected PGW's proposal to include certain revenues in base rates to offset long-term debt borrowing. |
|
09/07 |
The PUC Reported that PPL Corp. Intends to Sell Its Distribution Company, PPL Gas Utilities Corp. in 2008. The company serves about 77,000 natural gas customers in 34 Pennsylvania counties. |
|
06/06 |
Stakeholders Working Group Renamed SEARCH (Stakeholders Exploring Avenues for Removing Competition Hurdles). The PUC-led task force includes natural gas distribution companies (LDCs), marketers, and consumers. The group is examining issues related to mandatory capacity assignments, purchase of receivables, consumer education, consumer protection rules, and costs of retail supply services and also considering possible incentives that might result in LDCs exiting the merchant function. The group's report will be submitted to the PUC sometime in early 2007. |
|
03/06 |
PUC Adds Fourth Subgroup to Stakeholders Working Group: Competition Monitoring. The PUC confirmed the previously announced subgroups as well as a fourth one, Competition Monitoring. The subgroups will meet independently and provide updates at meetings of the entire working group. |
|
01/06 |
Stakeholders Working Group Meeting Scheduled and Subgroups Formed. The PUC proposed three subgroups to study specific issues and asked for volunteers to participate in each group. These subgroups are: Inter-Company Activity; Customer Interface; and Cost of Service. |
|
10/05 |
Report on Competition Submitted to General
Assembly. The PUC found that effective competition does
not exist in the retail natural gas supply market statewide and that
the PUC should reconvene stakeholders in the industry to explore
additional ways to increase competition. The group is expected to
meet by the end of the year. One commissioner (Shane) objected to
reconvening the stakeholders group and instead recommended repeal of
the Natural Gas Choice and Competition Act. |
|
09/04 |
Special Hearing Held to Determine
Competition Level. The PUC heard
comments from natural gas suppliers, natural gas distribution
companies, consumer advocates, and industry representatives as to
the status of competition in the retail natural gas market. In
general, companies cited a falloff in the number of participating
marketers and customers. |
|
05/04 |
Investigation Launched into Status of
Retail Competition. The PUC
directed LDCs and suppliers to provide data on gas sales,
transportation volumes, and the number of customers served since
1999, as part of its investigation into the competitiveness of
natural gas supply services in the State. The data and any comments
are due by August 27, 2004, and a hearing is scheduled for September
30, 2004. At the conclusion of the investigation, the PUC is to
report its findings to the General Assembly. |
|
10/03 |
Interagency Coordination Working Group
Formed. The PUC voted to create a working group for
enhanced interagency coordination on natural gas matters. The PUC is
also joining with the Council for Utility Choice to educate
consumers about rising gas prices and payment plan
options. |
|
09/03 |
Permanent Standards of Conduct
Proposed. The PUC adopted an order to start the formal
rulemaking process for permanent standards of conduct to govern
relationships between LDCs and affiliated suppliers. The proposed
standards are essentially the same as the interim standards adopted
in November 1999. If approved by the PUC, the standards will be
reviewed by the General Assembly and the Independent Regulatory
Review Commission before becoming effective. |
|
03/03 |
Approval of Pennsylvania Gas Work's (PGW)
Restructuring Settlement. The PUC
approved customer choice for all PGW customers, as of September
2003. |
|
01/00 |
Hearing Set on Approval of National Fuel
Gas Distribution Corporation's Restructuring
Settlement. Public hearing scheduled on customer choice
program for all National Fuel Gas customers, which is set to begin
on July 2000. |
|
12/99 |
Approval of Columbia Gas Restructuring
Settlement. The PUC
approved customer choice for all Columbia Gas customers, as of
November 1999. Customers can enroll over the Internet, by mail, or
by telephone. The company will conduct a consumer education program
and redesign its bill to allow easier price comparisons. The company
also continues its obligation as the supplier of last
resort. |
|
11/99 |
Standards of Conduct.
Order Re Binding Interim Standards, Docket
M-00991249 F0004. A utility may not give its affiliates any
preference in providing regulated services; may not tie regulated
service to any other product; and may not disclose any
customer-specific information (unless requested by customer).
Utilities and affiliates must maintain separate books and records
and any use of a utility's logo by an affiliate in the State must be
accompanied by a disclaimer stating that the companies are separate
entities and that the affiliate is
unregulated. |
|
11/99 |
Slamming
Prevention. Proposed Rulemaking Re Procedures To Ensure
Customer Consent to Change of Natural Gas Suppliers, Docket
M-00991249F0006. Customers need to contact NGSs directly to initiate
a provider change. If an intended switch has been verified (oral or
written confirmation), the NGS is to notify the LDC by the end of
the next business day. By the end of the next business day after
receipt of the notification, the LDC is to send a written
confirmation to the customer that includes notice of a 10-day
waiting period in which the switch can be canceled. If a customer
alleges that a switch occurred without consent, the matter is
considered to be a customer registered dispute. The utility company
must investigate and respond consistent with the PUC's regulations
applicable to utility company dispute procedures. Unauthorized
switching could result in fines being assessed and/or licenses being
revoked. Companies are to keep records related to a switching
dispute for 3 years. |
|
10/99 |
Customer Information.
Order Re Customer Information Disclosure
Requirements, Docket M-009991249 F0005. Provides interim guidelines
on customer information so that prices and services can be compared.
Defines terminology to be used and gives guidelines for bill format,
marketing materials, and disclosure statements. Companies sending
customer bills must first have their sample bills reviewed by the
PUC. Bills must separate the gas distribution company (LDC) charges
from the gas supplier (marketer) charges and list basic charges (for
services required for physical delivery of the gas to the customer)
before nonbasic (for optional recurring services) ones. Disclosure
statements for residential and small business customers shall
include contract's terms of service, including agreed upon prices,
start and end dates, specific price terms (such as variable terms),
details of any promotions, exclusions, cancellation and renewal
provisions, name and phone number of supplier of last resort,
penalties, fees or exceptions, and definition of basic charges.
Written disclosure statements shall be provided free of charge when
a customer asks a company to start service or when a company
proposes to change service terms. Customers are entitled to receive
historical billing information at no charge at least once a year.
Information about a customer cannot be provided to a third party
unless the customer has been notified and given the opportunity to
restrict the release of information. Customers must also be notified
about the process for settling
disputes. |
|
10/99 |
Safety and Reliability.
Interim Order on Safety and Reliability
Guidelines, Docket L-00990144. Natural gas suppliers (NGSs) must
deliver gas according to the LDC's existing tariff terms and
guarantee that they have sufficient capacity for their firm service
customers. LDCs are the supplier of last resort and function as
system operators. They can impose non-performance penalties on NGSs,
can set "critical day" procedures, and establish communication
protocols. Each LDC is to establish an Operational and Capacity
Council in an attempt to achieve consensus on outstanding
operational and capacity issues. |
|
08/99 |
Service Quality.
Order Re Guidelines for Maintaining Service
Quality, Docket M-00991249F0003. Provides guidelines for maintaining
service quality under retail competition at the same level as at
enactment date of the Natural Gas Choice and Competition Act and in
compliance with mandated standards and billing practices. LDCs are
to handle all applications for new service and develop procedures
for giving customers a choice of an alternative gas supplier, giving
all NGSs equal treatment. LDCs are to provide service in the
interim. LDCs and NGSs are to coordinate procedures related to
customer requests for the discontinuation of service and account
transfers, as per existing legislation. The order also provides
guidelines on dispute resolution and the application of partial
payments. |
|
07/99 |
Restructuring Filings.
Order: Natural Gas Choice and Competition Act
Filing Requirements, Docket M-00991249. Provides framework for LDCs
restructuring filings. Requires LDCs to address how supply services
will be unbundled and the methodology proposed to identify and
separate costs. LDCs are to provide a monthly and annual breakdown
of actual throughput volumes by rate schedule for calendar year
1998, or the company's most recent fiscal year, and an annual
summary of the 12 months preceding the selected year. LDCs must
specify provisions for: (1) billing, including formats for customers
who wish a single bill for supply and distribution services and for
those who wish separate bills; (2) compliance with supplier of last
resort requirements; (3) resolving customer complaints about billing
and about NGSs; (4) compliance with safety and reliability
standards, including how system's balancing services operate; (5)
addressing any limitations associated with receiving supplies at a
receipt point; (6) assessing non-performance penalties, (7) proposed
standards of conduct for LDC marketing activities; (8) universal
service and energy conservation programs; (9) establishing working
groups; (10) consumer education programs, including expected costs
and proposed cost recovery mechanism; and (11) recovery of deferred
costs. |
|
07/99 |
Licensing of Natural Gas Suppliers.
Order: Requirements for Natural Gas
Suppliers, Docket M-00991248F0002. All NGSs must have a license
issued by the PUC, including those companies operating in pilot
programs in the State. Applicants must meet bonding requirements of
the LDC in whose delivery area they are providing services and show
that they are financially and technically fit to meet system
reliability standards "consistent with the public interest" and the
LDC's supplier-of-last-resort obligation. NGSs who are currently
providing retail service in the State will be considered technically
fit. The PUC may limit its oversight of NGSs to bonding,
reliability, and consumer services and protections (which include
compliance with legislated standards and billing practices for
residential utility service). The standards of conduct approved for
the State's electric restructuring will serve as a guide for
drafting specific interim standards of conduct applicable to the
natural gas
industry. | |