Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print    


Children's Bureau Safety, Permanency, Well-being  Advanced
 Search

Oklahoma Title IV-E Foster Care
Eligibility Review
Period Under Review: October 1, 2002 - March 31, 2003

Introduction

During September 22-26, 2003, Administration for Children and Families (ACF) staff from the Dallas Regional and Central Offices staff and State of Oklahoma staff conducted an eligibility review of Oklahoma's title IV-E foster care program in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

The purpose of the title IV-E foster care eligibility review was (1) to determine if Oklahoma was in compliance with the child and provider eligibility requirements as outlined in 45 CFR 1356.71 and Section 472 of the Social Security Act; and (2) to validate the basis of Oklahoma's financial claims to ensure that appropriate payments were made on behalf of eligible children and to eligible homes and institutions.

Scope of the Review

The Oklahoma title IV-E foster care initial primary review encompassed a sample of all of the title IV-E foster care cases that received a foster care maintenance payment during the period of 10-1-02/3-31-03. A computerized statistical sample of 80 plus 20 over sample cases was drawn from the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) data which was transmitted by the State agency to the ACF for the period under review. The child's case file was reviewed for the determination of title IV-E eligibility and the provider's file was reviewed to ensure that the foster home or childcare institution in which the child was placed was licensed or approved for the period of the review.

Case Record Summary and Areas of Improvement

Although no Program Improvement Plan is required since there were no error cases, the following represents some of the review team recommendations for improvement:

Strengths and Model Practices

Other factors contributing to success of the review and the lack of errors include: