Summer 2007   

English Español Français
articles
 
 

Published in Winter 2004

Mexican farmers seek action from governments

 

By Lilia Pérez Santiago

 

To Mexican peasants, maize means life. In Oaxaca, the center of origin for maize, the peasant diet is based on maize, beans and other products grown in the same field. Here, a broad variety of maize breeds are jealously guarded as the legacy of ancestors.

In fact, Oaxaca’s peasants are the first line of defense for genetic maize diversity. The state’s 16 indigenous groups produce a genetic wealth of at least 18 varieties of maize, a significant number considering that 50 different varieties have been identified nationwide.

But in 2001, when the Union of Zapotec-Chinantec communities (Unión Zapoteca-Chinanteca—Uzachi) and researcher Ignacio Chapela found transgenic maize amongst the traditional land races in Oaxaca, the news alarmed us all.

Although government institutions initially sought to deny the situation, thereby avoiding any responsibility, subsequent test samples obtained by the National Institute of Ecology (Instituto Nacional de Ecología—INE) and the National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity (Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad—Conabio) confirmed UZACHI and Chapela’s results. INE agreed to follow through on the monitoring effort and offered some recommendations, such as not planting any maize coming from supply stores.

Farming communities, however, demanded that real measures be taken to stop the spread of transgenes. They want to know what problems may arise from the consumption of transgenic maize by humans and animals. And above all, they want to know how to preserve their traditional corn and safeguard the environment.

Thus, at the end of 2001, the communities collaborated with nongovernmental organizations such as Rural Studies and Consulting (Estudios Rurales y Asesoría—ERA), Greenpeace, Environmental Studies Group (Grupo de Estudios Ambientales—GEA) and the Mexican Center for Environmental Law (Centro Mexicano de Derecho Ambiental—CEMDA) to petition the CEC to oversee a more detailed investigation into the environmental and social effects of the presence of transgenic corn in Mexico.

The communities are currently awaiting the results of the study, so that the recommendations generated may be adopted by the responsible federal and state government agencies. The communities expect the results of the study to be applied swiftly.

But consenting to study the problem is not enough. Oaxaca’s peasant communities are tired of being marginalized, and not being involved in matters that affect their own development. Besides, farmers in Oaxaca’s Sierra Juárez mountains have been receiving scientists and journalists since the discovery was first made, without seeing the results of the research or the media reports.

When a study did eventually become available, the communities sought support from federal and state authorities for a transgenic maize program. In response, the Agriculture, Forestry and Mining Commission of the Oaxaca state legislature held a forum with the heads of various federal and state institutions to discuss the issue. The event led to several proposals and commitments from its participants, such as the creation of a State Biosafety Commission (Comisión Estatal de Bioseguridad), the development of programs to promote the planting of traditional corn, and public awareness and communication programs on the problem. However, none of the agreements or commitments raised at the forum has had any follow-up. Oaxacan peasants are therefore also tired of promises and inaction.

Oaxaca’s peasants will be anticipating a report based on local consultations that can then be communicated to all of our men, women and indigenous peoples in a language they understand.

Top



About the contributor

Lilia Pérez Santiago
Lilia Pérez Santiago is an agronomy engineer at the Union of Zapotec-Chinantec Communities, and a member of the Advisory Group on Maize and Biodiversity: The Effects of Transgenic Maize in Mexico.
Click here to print this article

Other articles for winter 2004

Transgenic maize goes under the microscope

Report spotlights regional effects of global issue

Mexican farmers seek action from governments

Maize farmers unhappy with NAFTA's price

Top experts to counsel NAFTA governments on maize

Food fight! The polarized GM food debate

Americans and Canadians react to Mexico corn-troversy

 

   Home | Past Issues | Search | Subscribe | Write Us

   CEC Homepage | Contact the CEC

   ISSN 1609-0810
   Created on: 06/10/2000     Last Updated: 21/06/2007
   © Commission for Environmental Cooperation