English Español Français
Canada, Mexico and the United States cooperating to protect North America's shared environment.
Google
 

Migratory Birds

Submmission ID: SEM-99-002
Party concerned: United States
Date filed: 19/11/1999
Status: Closed

 

Latest update: 24/04/2003
The final factual record was publicly released.

 

Summary of the matter addressed in the submission:
The Submitters allege that the United States Government is failing to effectively enforce Section 703 of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), 16 U.S.C. §§703-712, which prohibits the killing of migratory birds without a permit. The Submission alleges that MBTA implements four international treaties, including agreements with Canada and Mexico, aimed at protecting migratory birds, and in Section 703 prohibits any person from killing or "taking" migratory birds "by any means or in any manner," unless the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) issues a valid permit. The Submission alleges that " the United States deliberately refuses, however, to enforce this clear statutory prohibition as it relates to loggers, logging companies, and logging contractors. As a matter of internal policy, the United States has exempted logging operations from the MBTA's prohibitions without any legislation or regulation that authorizes such an exception." The Submitters assert that "[t]his enforcement failure undermines the cooperative efforts of Canada, Mexico and the United States to maintain biodiversity, a goal which the CEC has explicitly recognized and recently adopted through its North American Biodiversity Conservation Project."

Submitter(s)
Alliance for the Wild Rockies
Center for International Environmental Law
Centro de Derecho Ambiental del Noreste de Mexico
Centro Mexicano de Derecho Ambiental
Friends of the Earth
Instituto de Derecho Ambiental
Pacific Environment and Resources Center
Sierra Club of Canada
West Coast Environmental Law Association

More about the process
Bringing the Facts to Light
A Guide to Articles 14 and 15 of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation
More information >>
[Download document]

 

Name and citation of the environmental law inquestion
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), implementing the Convention between the United States (US) and Great Britain for the Protection of Migratory Birds in the US and Canada; Convention between the US and Mexico for the Protection of Migratory Birds and Game Mammals; Convention between the US and Japan for the Protection of Migratory Birds in Danger of Extinction, and their Environment; Convention between the US and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Concerning the Conservation of Migratory Birds and Their Environment.

 
 

 Submission timeline

 

22/11/1999

The Secretariat acknowledged receipt of a submission and began a preliminary analysis of it under the guidelines.

Submission — Submission authored by Submitter(s) on 17/11/1999

Acknowledgement — Communication to Submitter(s) authored by Secretariat on 22/11/1999

The Secretariat began reviewing the submission under Article 14(1).

 

23/12/1999

The Secretariat determined that the submission met the criteria of Article 14(1) and requested a response from the concerned government Party in accordance with Article 14(2).

Determination — Secretariat Determination under Article 14 (1) and 14 (2) authored by Secretariat on 23/12/1999

 

29/02/2000

The Secretariat received a response from the concerned government Party and began considering whether to recommend a factual record.

Party Response — Response from the Party under Article 14 (3) authored by United States on 29/02/2000

Acknowledgement — Other document authored by Secretariat on 6/03/2000

 

15/12/2000

The Secretariat informed Council that the Secretariat considers that the submission warrants development of a factual record.

Recommendation — Secretariat Notification to Council under Article 15(1) authored by Secretariat on 15/12/2000

 

16/11/2001

The Council voted to instruct the Secretariat to develop a Factual Record.

Resolution — Council decision concerning the development of a factual record authored by Council on 16/11/2001

 

14/12/2001

The Secretariat placed a work plan on its web site or otherwise made it available to the public and stakeholders.

Workplan — Overall workplan for factual record authored by Secretariat on 14/12/2001

 

1/02/2002

The Secretariat posted a request for information relevant to the factual record on its web site.

Secretariat Information Request — Document related to the preparation of a Factual record authored by Secretariat on 1/02/2002

 

28/11/2002

The Secretariat submitted a draft factual record to Council, for a 45-day comment period on the accuracy of the draft.

 

13/01/2003

The Secretariat received comments from the United States.

 

21/02/2003

The Secretariat submitted a final factual record to Council for Council's vote on whether to make the final factual record publicly available.

 

22/04/2003

Council voted to instruct the Secretariat to make the final factual record publicly available.

Resolution — Council decision on whether the factual record will be made publicly available authored by Council on 22/04/2003

 

24/04/2003

The final factual record was publicly released.

Final Factual Record — Final Factual Record authored by Secretariat on 22/04/2003

 

Home | Latest News | Calendar of Events | Who We Are | Our Programs and Projects | Publications and Information Resources | Citizen Submissions on Enforcement Matters | Grants for Environmental Cooperation | Contracts, Jobs, RFPs | Site Map | Contact Us