McNair Paper 34, The Russian Military's Role in Politics, January 1995
The most immediate threat to Russia's survival, however, is not the aspirations of its provinces for independence but the political turmoil generated by the center's attempts to move from authoritarianism to democracy. This attempt has been profoundly destabilizing for central authority, in part because Russia is trying to graft democratic institutions and processes onto a society that is still largely authoritarian. Although Russia experimented briefly with democratic institutions early this century, these experiences are too remote and too brief to have contributed much to the growth of democratic political culture. As a result, Russia's political environment has alternated between gridlock and crisis. Most of the crises have, up until now at least, been generated by conflict between executive and legislative authority.
The Russian high command has shown even less enthusiasm for involvement in these political struggles than its Soviet predecessor. When an angry Yeltsin challenged the legislature in December 1992, Defense Minister Grachev (a close Yeltsin crony) declined to support his boss. Similarly, when Yeltsin attempted to bypass the legislature in March 1993-and only narrowly escaped impeachment-Grachev, like KGB chief Barannikov and MVD chief Yerin, joined virtually all the rest of Yeltsin's cabinet in proclaiming fealty to the Constitution Yeltsin was trying to overturn.
THE MILITARY AND RUSSIA'S LEGISLATIVE-EXECUTIVE STRUGGLE