ARSCLIST Archives – January 2009

1. "Computer speakers" recommendations
   • "Computer speakers" recommendations (32 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 20:37:20 -0500
   • Re: "Computer speakers" recommendations (28 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 21:00:32 -0500
   • Re: "Computer speakers" recommendations (23 lines)
     From: John Bondurant <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:14:40 -0500

2. 3 articles: iTunes; the Music industry and digital; Barenboim
   • 3 articles: iTunes; the Music industry and digital; Barenboim (36 lines)
     From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 11:09:23 -0500
   • Re: 3 articles: iTunes; the Music industry and digital; Barenboim (78 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:22:38 -0500

3. Austin, TX AV Media Preservation Program in March 2009 - Register Now!
   • Austin, TX AV Media Preservation Program in March 2009 - Register Now! (129 lines)
     From: Andrews, Kim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:56:26 -0500

4. Barry Ashpole
   • Barry Ashpole (14 lines)
     From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:57:24 -0000

5. basic question from a newbie
   • basic question from a newbie (69 lines)
     From: Morman, Ed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:25:37 -0500
   • Re: basic question from a newbie (149 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:25:12 -0500
   • Re: basic question from a newbie (172 lines)
     From: Frances, Melodie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:29:19 -0800
   • Re: basic question from a newbie (60 lines)
     From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:18:21 -0800
   • Re: basic question from a newbie (55 lines)
     From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:09:19 -0800
   • Re: basic question from a newbie (201 lines)
     From: Morman, Ed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:05:49 -0500
   • Re: basic question from a newbie (171 lines)
     From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:23:06 -0600
   • Re: basic question from a newbie (43 lines)
     From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:04:51 -0800
   • Re: basic question from a newbie (37 lines)
     From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:29:45 -0800
   • Re: basic question from a newbie (63 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 06:42:05 -0500
   • Re: basic question from a newbie (203 lines)
     From: Morman, Ed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:07:49 -0500

6. Call for Papers - IASA 2009 (Athens) "Towards a New Kind of Archive?..."
   • Call for Papers - IASA 2009 (Athens) "Towards a New Kind of Archive?..." (83 lines)
     From: Jacqueline von Arb <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:06:21 +0100
   • Re: Call for Papers - IASA 2009 (Athens) "Towards a New Kind of Archive?..." (87 lines)
     From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 22:44:37 -0500
   • Re: Call for Papers - IASA 2009 (Athens) "Towards a New Kind of Archive?..." (117 lines)
     From: Brian McNerney <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 23:40:00 -0600
   • Re: Call for Papers - IASA 2009 (Athens) "Towards a New Kind of Archive?..." (113 lines)
     From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 01:29:01 -0500

7. Cost of tape vs HD (was: crashed disk drive recovery)
   • Re: Cost of tape vs HD (was: crashed disk drive recovery) (236 lines)
     From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:26:08 -0500
   • Re: Cost of tape vs HD (was: crashed disk drive recovery) (64 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:48:04 -0500
   • Re: Cost of tape vs HD (was: crashed disk drive recovery) (35 lines)
     From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:10:15 -0800
   • Re: Cost of tape vs HD (was: crashed disk drive recovery) (44 lines)
     From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:58:14 -0500

8. Exciting announcement
   • Exciting announcement (23 lines)
     From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 04:43:57 -0000
   • Re: Exciting announcement (42 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 22:17:22 -0800

9. Jacqueline Du Pre - Peter and the Wolf
   • Jacqueline Du Pre - Peter and the Wolf (20 lines)
     From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 22:37:09 -0500

10. January Issue of Black Grooves
    • January Issue of Black Grooves (37 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:38:46 -0500

11. Last Call for ARSC Conference Proposals
    • Last Call for ARSC Conference Proposals (27 lines)
      From: David Giovannoni (ARSC) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:42:35 -0500

12. Magnetic Recording History (was OTR online?
    • Re: Magnetic Recording History (was OTR online? (197 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 13:26:28 -0500
    • Re: Magnetic Recording History (was OTR online? (43 lines)
      From: Anthony Baldwin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 20:13:17 +0100
    • Re: Magnetic Recording History (was OTR online? (55 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:04:17 -0500
    • Re: Magnetic Recording History (was OTR online? (276 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 00:42:14 +0100
    • Re: Magnetic Recording History (was OTR online? (32 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:18:21 -0800
    • Re: Magnetic Recording History (was OTR online? (61 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 02:15:41 +0100
    • Re: Magnetic Recording History (was OTR online? (45 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 23:17:58 -0500
    • Re: Magnetic Recording History (was OTR online? (51 lines)
      From: Anthony Baldwin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 09:26:51 +0100
    • Re: Magnetic Recording History (was OTR online? (277 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 07:36:12 -0500
    • Re: Magnetic Recording History (was OTR online? (41 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 09:38:37 -0500
    • Re: Magnetic Recording History (was OTR online? (61 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 09:44:20 -0500
    • Re: Magnetic Recording History (was OTR online? (87 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 16:00:40 +0100

13. Magnetic Recording History as a book publication by Friedrich Engel
    • Re: Magnetic Recording History as a book publication by Friedrich Engel (121 lines)
      From: Joachim Polzer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 20:36:09 +0100

14. museums for audio equipment
    • museums for audio equipment (35 lines)
      From: Warren, Richard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:44:36 -0500
    • Re: museums for audio equipment (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:23:32 -0600

15. Old-Time Fiddle Records
    • Re: Old-Time Fiddle Records (52 lines)
      From: McLane, Alexander <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 22:25:38 -0500

16. Old-time fiddle records
    • Re: Old-time fiddle records (55 lines)
      From: John Bondurant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:47:49 -0500
    • Re: Old-time fiddle records (71 lines)
      From: Nelson, James S. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:46:51 -0600

17. OTR online?
    • OTR online? (23 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:12:41 -0800
    • Re: OTR online? (42 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:19:13 -0500
    • Re: OTR online? (50 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:39:02 -0800
    • Re: OTR online? (52 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:49:19 -0800
    • Re: OTR online? (67 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 15:30:15 -0500
    • Re: OTR online? (81 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:52:26 -0800
    • Re: OTR online? (76 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:17:06 -0500
    • Re: OTR online? (28 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:38:48 -0800
    • Re: OTR online? (21 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:41:29 -0800
    • Re: OTR online? (107 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:47:50 -0800
    • Re: OTR online? (72 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:15:35 -0800
    • Re: OTR online? (137 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:39:44 -0500
    • Re: OTR online? (40 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 21:08:43 -0800
    • Re: OTR online? (178 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 21:41:47 -0800
    • Re: OTR online? (27 lines)
      From: Robert Cham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 00:42:48 -0600
    • Re: OTR online? (63 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 03:27:33 -0500
    • Re: OTR online? (21 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 01:00:48 -0800
    • Re: OTR online? (32 lines)
      From: Anthony Baldwin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:18:04 +0100
    • Re: OTR online? (125 lines)
      From: Anthony Baldwin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:51:41 +0100
    • Re: OTR online? (31 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:13:03 -0600
    • Re: OTR online? (27 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:19:16 -0600
    • Re: OTR online? (25 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 13:34:13 -0600
    • Re: OTR online? (34 lines)
      From: Robert Cham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:23:17 -0600
    • Re: OTR online? (31 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 22:20:07 -0500
    • Re: OTR online? (162 lines)
      From: Charles A. Richardson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:13:40 -0500
    • Re: OTR online? (34 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 11:12:13 -0800
    • Re: OTR online? (32 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 21:43:53 -0500
    • Re: OTR online? (151 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 22:06:31 -0500

18. OTR Radio online
    • OTR Radio online (29 lines)
      From: Dave Radlauer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:44:05 EST

19. Public Broadcasting stimulus proposal
    • Public Broadcasting stimulus proposal (65 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:41:12 -0800

20. QRS stops making piano rolls
    • QRS stops making piano rolls (32 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:10:24 -0800

21. Radio Dismuke New Year's Broadcast
    • Re: Radio Dismuke New Year's Broadcast (102 lines)
      From: Jack Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 06:57:34 -0500
    • Re: Radio Dismuke New Year's Broadcast (32 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 15:46:49 +0200
    • Re: Radio Dismuke New Year's Broadcast (45 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 08:55:54 -0500
    • Re: Radio Dismuke New Year's Broadcast (59 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:10:38 -0800
    • Re: Radio Dismuke New Year's Broadcast (24 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 21:54:51 +0200
    • Re: Radio Dismuke New Year's Broadcast (46 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:51:54 -0800
    • Re: Radio Dismuke New Year's Broadcast (28 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 07:40:17 +0200

22. STANFORD MUSIC SYMPOSIUM: REACTIONS TO THE RECORD II
    • STANFORD MUSIC SYMPOSIUM: REACTIONS TO THE RECORD II (26 lines)
      From: Amy Franzblau <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 23:47:02 -0800
    • Re: STANFORD MUSIC SYMPOSIUM: REACTIONS TO THE RECORD II (39 lines)
      From: Kumaran Arul <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 04:45:28 -0500

23. Tape Degradation paper now available online
    • Tape Degradation paper now available online (19 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 22:50:15 -0500