ARSCLIST Archives – October 2008

1. "A 440 Records" 1950's lp's
   • "A 440 Records" 1950's lp's (22 lines)
     From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:39:03 -0400
   • Re: "A 440 Records" 1950's lp's (35 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:58:10 -0400
   • Re: "A 440 Records" 1950's lp's (32 lines)
     From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:11:12 -0400

2. $750 Stipend Deadline Approaching - SF AV Media Preservation Program in October
   • $750 Stipend Deadline Approaching - SF AV Media Preservation Program in October (116 lines)
     From: Andrews, Kim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:19:45 -0400

3. (no subject)
   • (no subject) (12 lines)
     From: J. E. Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:37:38 -0600

4. 1941 Tannhauser wanted
   • 1941 Tannhauser wanted (34 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 18:20:23 -0400
   • Re: 1941 Tannhauser wanted (43 lines)
     From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 15:56:26 -0700
   • Re: 1941 Tannhauser wanted (52 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:08:39 -0700
   • Re: 1941 Tannhauser wanted (59 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 19:31:27 -0400
   • Re: 1941 Tannhauser wanted (73 lines)
     From: G. W. Ulrich Sieveking <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:23:13 +0200

5. 45rpm sound quality with respect to their 33rpm counterpart?
   • 45rpm sound quality with respect to their 33rpm counterpart? (25 lines)
     From: D. Blake Werts <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:57:04 -0400
   • Re: 45rpm sound quality with respect to their 33rpm counterpart? (36 lines)
     From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:39:40 -0700
   • Re: 45rpm sound quality with respect to their 33rpm counterpart? (39 lines)
     From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:49:33 -0700
   • Re: 45rpm sound quality with respect to their 33rpm counterpart? (27 lines)
     From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:37:59 -0700
   • Re: 45rpm sound quality with respect to their 33rpm counterpart? (42 lines)
     From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:18:11 -0400
   • Re: 45rpm sound quality with respect to their 33rpm counterpart? (54 lines)
     From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:38:07 -0700
   • Re: 45rpm sound quality with respect to their 33rpm counterpart? (36 lines)
     From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:04:18 -0700

6. 78 & 33 rpm record auction/Schallplattenauktion
   • 78 & 33 rpm record auction/Schallplattenauktion (33 lines)
     From: Birgit Lotz Verlag <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:22:10 +0200

7. 78-L rebooted
   • 78-L rebooted (21 lines)
     From: Malcolm Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 06:57:04 -1000
   • Re: 78-L rebooted (29 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 13:02:03 -0400
   • Re: 78-L rebooted (30 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 12:19:10 -0500
   • Re: 78-L rebooted (46 lines)
     From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 23:03:55 -0400
   • Re: 78-L rebooted (27 lines)
     From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 20:21:54 -0700
   • Re: 78-L rebooted (37 lines)
     From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 23:38:02 -0400

8. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (13 lines)
     From: Suzanne <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:06:30 -0400
   • <No subject> (26 lines)
     From: MATSUBAYASHI, 'Shaolin' Kohji <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:20:12 +0900

9. Aberdeen Music Hall - Harry Gordon
   • Aberdeen Music Hall - Harry Gordon (18 lines)
     From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 01:27:18 -0400
   • Re: Aberdeen Music Hall - Harry Gordon (68 lines)
     From: Mike Hirst <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:21:11 +0100
   • Re: Aberdeen Music Hall - Harry Gordon (81 lines)
     From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:19:49 -0400

10. Absolute Polarity
    • Absolute Polarity (42 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:02:26 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (58 lines)
      From: Jerry Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:20:05 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (132 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:41:12 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (25 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:34:03 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (44 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:46:13 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (67 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:08:58 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (42 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:42:15 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (74 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:46:21 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (41 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:43:47 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (51 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:01:08 -0500
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (24 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:46:25 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (33 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:45:24 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (53 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:49:23 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (24 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:30:08 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (52 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:29:33 -0700
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (32 lines)
      From: Robert Cham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:35:29 -0500
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (107 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:21:08 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (46 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:18:59 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (33 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:05:49 -0500
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (62 lines)
      From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:40:39 -0500
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (46 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:35:19 -0700
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (94 lines)
      From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:16:43 +0200
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (114 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:14:11 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (128 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:17:35 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (39 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:33:54 -0700
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (148 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:10:18 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (61 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:12:30 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (35 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:34:28 -0700
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (38 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:53:51 -0400
    • Re: Absolute Polarity (30 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:24:17 -0700

11. Announcement: New Website for Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative
    • Announcement: New Website for Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative (48 lines)
      From: Marsha Maguire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:50:08 -0400

12. Aren't recordings original ..... Blah! NOT CABLES THIS TIME!
    • Re: Aren't recordings original ..... Blah! NOT CABLES THIS TIME! (138 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:51:15 +0200

13. Aren't recordings original sources?
    • Aren't recordings original sources? (86 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:44:22 -0700
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (44 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:14:22 -0700
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (113 lines)
      From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:22:25 +1300
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (57 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:52:00 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (104 lines)
      From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:12:05 +1300
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (152 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:32:18 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (51 lines)
      From: Patrick Feaster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:24:01 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (106 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:27:27 +0200
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (54 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:01:04 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (68 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:21:19 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (56 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:33:00 -0700
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (34 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:14:21 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (59 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:22:49 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (75 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:32:42 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (58 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:09:53 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (50 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:53:09 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (104 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:07:10 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (42 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:50:34 -0700
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (81 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:22:53 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (63 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:00:07 -0500
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (108 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:01:46 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (30 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:06:20 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (40 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:47:09 -0700
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (70 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:57:12 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (109 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:07:35 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (43 lines)
      From: Jim Sam <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:27:36 -0700
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (275 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:42:58 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (179 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:49:55 -0500
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (85 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:19:25 -0500
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (99 lines)
      From: Malcolm Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:46:32 -1000
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (46 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:50:42 -0700
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (64 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:17:31 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (27 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:19:38 -0700
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (44 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:59:08 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (70 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:10:37 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (66 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:39:12 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (35 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:31:06 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (54 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:05:29 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (48 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:21:46 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (56 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:18:24 -0500
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (71 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:28:23 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (48 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:21:33 -0500
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (85 lines)
      From: Malcolm Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:09:43 -1000
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (208 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:15:51 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (43 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:23:41 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (70 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:35:25 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (27 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:41:04 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (44 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:44:33 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (87 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:53:36 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (64 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:03:26 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (88 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:08:19 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (104 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:17:22 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (101 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:28:11 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (78 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:34:34 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (81 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:57:48 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (44 lines)
      From: Dale Francis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:06:58 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (128 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:23:54 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (312 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:01:50 -0500
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (95 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:06:47 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (83 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:31:59 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (93 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:27:00 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (109 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:41:49 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (208 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:18:59 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (442 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:43:06 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (134 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:29:39 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (159 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:43:03 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (168 lines)
      From: David Goren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:03:54 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (207 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:13:15 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (30 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:44:16 -0700
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (23 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 19:30:49 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (262 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:50:37 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (44 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:59:01 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (283 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:30:41 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (63 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:30:00 +0000
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (35 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:03:15 +0000
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (73 lines)
      From: J. E. Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:23:41 -0600
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (357 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:23:02 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (39 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:30:02 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (32 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:20:41 +0000
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (153 lines)
      From: Larry S Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:20:56 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (81 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:16:51 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (52 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:22:06 +0200
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (52 lines)
      From: Robert J Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:21:10 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (71 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:58:03 +0100
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (106 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:07:52 +0200
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (77 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:08:10 +0000
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (28 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:10:57 +0000
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (153 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:07:59 +0100
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (35 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:39:19 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (42 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:50:50 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (223 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:45:04 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (80 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:52:59 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (99 lines)
      From: Larry S Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:55:40 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (101 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:00:05 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (65 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:03:53 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (33 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:08:00 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (110 lines)
      From: Larry S Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:16:36 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (50 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:18:33 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (126 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:25:26 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (52 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:29:35 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (68 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:03:42 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (53 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:55:36 +0200
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (77 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:14:41 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (80 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:22:43 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (75 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:38:19 -0400
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (43 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:11:39 +0000
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (67 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:16:57 +0000
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (57 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:30:57 +0000
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (111 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:23:35 +0000
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (37 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:09:13 +0000
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (69 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:33:35 -0500
    • Re: Aren't recordings original sources? (72 lines)
      From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:49:15 +0200

14. ARSC Awards: 2008 Winners
    • ARSC Awards: 2008 Winners (294 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:52:48 -0400

15. ARSC Journal needed..repeat
    • ARSC Journal needed..repeat (19 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:48:10 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat (38 lines)
      From: Farrington, Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:54:47 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat (38 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:27:07 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat (51 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:28:34 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat (71 lines)
      From: Farrington, Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:44:01 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat (48 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:19:33 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat (54 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:53:34 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:39:18 -0700
    • Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat (30 lines)
      From: Randy Watts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:22:24 -0700
    • Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat (42 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:45:02 -0400

16. ARSC Preservation Grants Program 2009
    • ARSC Preservation Grants Program 2009 (80 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:42:21 -0400

17. ARSC Research Grants Program 2009
    • ARSC Research Grants Program 2009 (94 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 21:05:57 -0400

18. Article on a lawsuit related to illegal downloading
    • Article on a lawsuit related to illegal downloading (24 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:19:29 -0700

19. Audograph disc
    • Audograph disc (24 lines)
      From: Stewart Adam <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:40:25 -0400
    • Re: Audograph disc (42 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:26:32 -0700
    • Re: Audograph disc (75 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:14:18 -0700
    • Re: Audograph disc (29 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:37:23 -0400
    • Re: Audograph disc (50 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:29:54 -0400
    • Re: Audograph disc (69 lines)
      From: Robert J Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:56:47 -0400

20. BASF LH 60
    • BASF LH 60 (53 lines)
      From: Mike Hirst <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:42:33 +0100
    • Re: BASF LH 60 (62 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 08:02:29 -0400
    • Re: BASF LH 60 (54 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:13:55 -0400
    • Re: BASF LH 60 (66 lines)
      From: Mike Hirst <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:23:34 +0100
    • Re: BASF LH 60 (26 lines)
      From: Mike Hirst <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:29:58 +0100
    • Re: BASF LH 60 (55 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:38:18 -0400
    • Re: BASF LH 60 (53 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 08:26:35 -0400
    • Re: BASF LH 60 (99 lines)
      From: Marie OConnell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:01:29 +1300
    • Re: BASF LH 60 (49 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:20:48 -0400
    • Re: BASF LH 60 (98 lines)
      From: Mike Hirst <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:58:11 +0100

21. Broadcast transcription discs
    • Broadcast transcription discs (54 lines)
      From: Rodriguez, Sandy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:55:37 -0500

22. Brunswick dating
    • Brunswick dating (17 lines)
      From: Anthony Barnett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:29:52 +0000
    • Re: Brunswick dating (31 lines)
      From: Paul Charosh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:22:16 EDT

23. Canfield Guide
    • Canfield Guide (18 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:09:31 -0400
    • Re: Canfield Guide (38 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:52:27 -0700

24. Capitol 50-60s ledgers??
    • Re: Capitol 50-60s ledgers?? (39 lines)
      From: Dan Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:14:38 -0700
    • Re: Capitol 50-60s ledgers?? (22 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:29:17 -0400

25. Cassette players
    • Cassette players (48 lines)
      From: McLane, Alexander <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:52:13 -0400
    • Re: Cassette players (123 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 18:34:43 -0400
    • Re: Cassette players (20 lines)
      From: David Goren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 18:05:00 -0500
    • Re: Cassette players (81 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:32:25 -0400
    • Re: Cassette players (38 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:21:09 -0400
    • Re: Cassette players (36 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:35:02 +0000

26. Cassette players (and in-house transfers versus outsourcing)
    • Re: Cassette players (and in-house transfers versus outsourcing) (108 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:19:00 -0700

27. Cassette players (pitch correction)
    • Re: Cassette players (pitch correction) (41 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:26:01 -0700
    • Re: Cassette players (pitch correction) (58 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:12:45 -0400
    • Re: Cassette players (pitch correction) (34 lines)
      From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:50:21 +0200
    • Re: Cassette players (pitch correction) (36 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:38:59 +0000

28. Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
    • Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (34 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:17:38 -0700
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (47 lines)
      From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:51:49 -0400
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (24 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:12:11 -0400
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (29 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:52:51 -0500
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (79 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:22:03 -0400
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (46 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:53:58 -0400
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (57 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:20:34 -0500
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (72 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:29:38 -0400
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (102 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:02:02 -0400
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (115 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:54:39 -0400
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (140 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:06:26 -0400
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (140 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:21:53 +0100
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (35 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:40:07 -0500
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (207 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:44:59 -0400
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (183 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:48:17 -0400
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (141 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:57:59 -0400
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (244 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:18:28 -0400
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (215 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:47:46 +0200
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (51 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:50:40 +0000
    • Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources? (65 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:45:51 -0400

29. copyright and music libraries
    • copyright and music libraries (34 lines)
      From: Gary R. Boye <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:14:10 -0400
    • Re: copyright and music libraries (44 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:51:11 -0700

30. Crest Records / Silver Crest
    • Crest Records / Silver Crest (30 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:07:40 -0400
    • Re: Crest Records / Silver Crest (25 lines)
      From: Michael Fitzgerald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:29:34 -0400
    • Re: Crest Records / Silver Crest (47 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:28:05 -0700
    • Re: Crest Records / Silver Crest (42 lines)
      From: Adam Michlin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:40:54 -0400
    • Re: Crest Records / Silver Crest (50 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 23:02:59 -0400
    • Re: Crest Records / Silver Crest (32 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 08:50:28 -0400

31. Date/info ? NBC program transcriptions
    • Date/info ? NBC program transcriptions (24 lines)
      From: Dan Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:28:52 -0700

32. DVD-Video audio track ripper?
    • DVD-Video audio track ripper? (34 lines)
      From: Andy Kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:15:12 -0400
    • Re: DVD-Video audio track ripper? (33 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:55:33 -0700
    • Re: DVD-Video audio track ripper? (65 lines)
      From: Mike Hirst <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:10:42 +0100
    • Re: DVD-Video audio track ripper? (71 lines)
      From: Mike Hirst <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:27:22 +0100
    • Re: DVD-Video audio track ripper? (49 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:06:26 -0600
    • Re: DVD-Video audio track ripper? (63 lines)
      From: Lee Tran <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:50:21 -0500

33. ELP turntable/original recordings
    • Re: ELP turntable/original recordings (127 lines)
      From: Dan Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:33:25 -0700
    • Re: ELP turntable/original recordings (53 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:44:16 -0400

34. Fishing -- old Epic Records classical listings
    • Fishing -- old Epic Records classical listings (29 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:38:47 -0400
    • Re: Fishing -- old Epic Records classical listings (50 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:36:05 -0700

35. FM broadcasting way back when
    • Re: FM broadcasting way back when (131 lines)
      From: Dan Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 18:01:55 -0700

36. FM reception way back when
    • FM reception way back when (23 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 00:59:17 -0400
    • Re: FM reception way back when (47 lines)
      From: David Weiner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:54:49 -0400
    • Re: FM reception way back when (70 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:09:15 -0400
    • Re: FM reception way back when (27 lines)
      From: Mark Durenberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:22:57 -0500
    • Re: FM reception way back when (102 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:53:26 -0500
    • Re: FM reception way back when (37 lines)
      From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:48:49 -0500
    • Re: FM reception way back when (68 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:05:56 -0700
    • Re: FM reception way back when (40 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:08:38 -0700
    • Re: FM reception way back when (73 lines)
      From: Michael H. Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:37:17 -0400
    • Re: FM reception way back when (132 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:31:00 -0400
    • Re: FM reception way back when (104 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:29:08 -0700
    • Re: FM reception way back when (115 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 18:00:07 -0400
    • Re: FM reception way back when (116 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 18:21:22 -0400
    • Re: FM reception way back when (25 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 15:08:01 -0700
    • Re: FM reception way back when (55 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 19:33:33 -0400
    • Re: FM reception way back when (76 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:45:19 -0700
    • Re: FM reception way back when (59 lines)
      From: Robert Cham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 22:09:41 -0500
    • Re: FM reception way back when (39 lines)
      From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 22:40:11 -0500
    • Re: FM reception way back when (93 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 01:55:22 -0400
    • Re: FM reception way back when (34 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 08:03:34 +0200
    • Re: FM reception way back when (130 lines)
      From: Charles A. Richardson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:02:04 -0400
    • Re: FM reception way back when (35 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 18:22:34 -0700

37. FREE Three-day Jazz Conference in Philly NEXT WEEK!
    • FREE Three-day Jazz Conference in Philly NEXT WEEK! (79 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:51:50 EDT

38. Fw: Make sure MEPs hear your views on copyright term extension - get in touch today
    • Fw: Make sure MEPs hear your views on copyright term extension - get in touch today (102 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:06:45 +0100

39. FW: Seats still available for upcoming SOLINET classes
    • FW: Seats still available for upcoming SOLINET classes (34 lines)
      From: Leming, Jessica <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:39:25 -0400

40. Fwd: Call for Papers: Bibliographic Control of Audiovisual and Multimedia Materials, Milano, August 2009
    • Fwd: Call for Papers: Bibliographic Control of Audiovisual and Multimedia Materials, Milano, August 2009 (145 lines)
      From: Corinne Forstot <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:06:41 -0700

41. Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941)
    • Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941) (115 lines)
      From: Doug Pomeroy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 09:39:08 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941) (182 lines)
      From: Prentice, Will <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:18:07 +0100
    • Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941) (199 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:18:53 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941) (28 lines)
      From: Mark Durenberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 08:42:14 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941) (32 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:12:30 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941) (44 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:21:18 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941) (60 lines)
      From: Michael H. Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:29:11 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941) (33 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:37:36 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941) (35 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:09:38 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941) (44 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:54:22 -0400

42. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Aren't recordings original sources?
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Aren't recordings original sources? (30 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:38:16 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Aren't recordings original sources? (23 lines)
      From: Howard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:58:48 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Aren't recordings original sources? (40 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:34:34 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Aren't recordings original sources? (41 lines)
      From: Howard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:18:05 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Aren't recordings original sources? (29 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:23:11 +0000
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Aren't recordings original sources? (45 lines)
      From: Dave Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:08:15 -0700
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Aren't recordings original sources? (19 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:26:29 -0700

43. Help !!
    • Help !! (18 lines)
      From: J. E. Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:50:20 -0600
    • Re: Help !! (34 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:18:52 -0400

44. Hyperthreading (was Software for Mac)
    • Re: Hyperthreading (was Software for Mac) (89 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:38:57 -0400
    • Re: Hyperthreading (was Software for Mac) (81 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:25:18 -0400
    • Re: Hyperthreading (was Software for Mac) (115 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:29:14 -0400
    • Re: Hyperthreading (was Software for Mac) (106 lines)
      From: carlstephen koto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:48:12 -0700
    • Re: Hyperthreading (was Software for Mac) (51 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:04:40 -0400
    • Re: Hyperthreading (was Software for Mac) (76 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:06:08 -0400

45. IMLS Doctoral Preservation Fellowships
    • IMLS Doctoral Preservation Fellowships (48 lines)
      From: Ellen Cunningham-Kruppa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:07:22 -0500

46. Jazz Loft to see the light of day...
    • Jazz Loft to see the light of day... (99 lines)
      From: Dave Nolan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:27:03 -0400
    • Re: Jazz Loft to see the light of day... (83 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:46:21 -0400
    • Re: Jazz Loft to see the light of day... (32 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:50:47 -0400
    • Re: Jazz Loft to see the light of day... (95 lines)
      From: Sam Brylawski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:57:53 -0400
    • Re: Jazz Loft to see the light of day... (42 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:30:52 -0400
    • Re: Jazz Loft to see the light of day... (123 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 01:38:26 -0400
    • Re: Jazz Loft to see the light of day... (32 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 01:27:17 -0500

47. Kanawha Records - The Mandolin and other stuff
    • Kanawha Records - The Mandolin and other stuff (20 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:23:23 -0400

48. LC NAVCC Job Opening: Preservation Specialist (Audio)
    • LC NAVCC Job Opening: Preservation Specialist (Audio) (25 lines)
      From: Stephen C Leggett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:33:23 -0400

49. looking for supplies
    • looking for supplies (36 lines)
      From: Kevin Tripp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:46:37 -0800
    • Re: looking for supplies (19 lines)
      From: Howard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:14:15 -0400
    • Re: looking for supplies (24 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:57:31 -0700
    • Re: looking for supplies (24 lines)
      From: Howard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:07:53 -0400

50. Lysistrata Overture
    • Lysistrata Overture (18 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:31:58 -0400
    • Re: Lysistrata Overture (38 lines)
      From: Punto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 22:56:43 -0400
    • Re: Lysistrata Overture (29 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:05:33 -0700
    • Re: Lysistrata Overture (43 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:00:41 -0400
    • Re: Lysistrata Overture (50 lines)
      From: Michael H. Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:24:26 -0400
    • Re: Lysistrata Overture (16 lines)
      From: Howard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:41:03 -0400
    • Re: Lysistrata Overture (61 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:46:41 -0400

51. Lysistrata Overture (2)
    • Re: Lysistrata Overture (2) (33 lines)
      From: Punto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:07:35 -0400
    • Re: Lysistrata Overture (2) (44 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:23:44 -0400
    • Re: Lysistrata Overture (2) (45 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:36:18 -0400

52. Mailing lists for Phonograph Cylinders
    • Re: Mailing lists for Phonograph Cylinders (34 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:27:34 +0300

53. Mercury Perfect Presence records
    • Mercury Perfect Presence records (27 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:48:55 -0400
    • Re: Mercury Perfect Presence records (42 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:14:05 -0400
    • Re: Mercury Perfect Presence records (58 lines)
      From: MATSUBAYASHI, 'Shaolin' Kohji <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:07:14 +0900
    • Re: Mercury Perfect Presence records (74 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:45:28 -0400
    • Re: Mercury Perfect Presence records (92 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:58:10 -0400

54. Met Opera on the web
    • Met Opera on the web (85 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:34:01 -0400

55. Meta comment with new subject line (public aspects of ARSCLIST)
    • Re: Meta comment with new subject line (public aspects of ARSCLIST) (60 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:49:43 -0700

56. Meta comment with new subject line.
    • Meta comment with new subject line. (50 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:36:06 -0700
    • Re: Meta comment with new subject line. (100 lines)
      From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:07:50 +1300
    • Re: Meta comment with new subject line. (37 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:43:10 +0100
    • Re: Meta comment with new subject line. (58 lines)
      From: Bryan E Cornell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:30:36 -0400
    • Re: Meta comment with new subject line. (31 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:50:44 -0700
    • Re: Meta comment with new subject line. (85 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 22:59:16 -0400
    • Re: Meta comment with new subject line. (41 lines)
      From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:07:56 -0700

57. Meta comment with new subject line. 1TB hard drives
    • Re: Meta comment with new subject line. 1TB hard drives (130 lines)
      From: Dan Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:11:21 -0700

58. mostly for laughs too-- audio in asphalt?
    • Re: mostly for laughs too-- audio in asphalt? (258 lines)
      From: Matt Love <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 06:59:48 -0600

59. motion picture amps (optical sound)
    • motion picture amps (optical sound) (22 lines)
      From: Jack Honeycutt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:19:57 -0700

60. Mutual Presents The National Symphony Orchestra
    • Mutual Presents The National Symphony Orchestra (33 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:54:55 -0700
    • Re: Mutual Presents The National Symphony Orchestra (33 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:43:10 -0400

61. Nakamichi 480 audio cassette deck
    • Nakamichi 480 audio cassette deck (16 lines)
      From: m segal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:16:02 -0400

62. new low-priced record cleaner
    • new low-priced record cleaner (20 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 07:02:20 -0400

63. new member
    • new member (24 lines)
      From: heather james <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:43:57 -0700
    • Re: new member (64 lines)
      From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:01:21 -0700

64. NTSC betamax players
    • NTSC betamax players (66 lines)
      From: Prentice, Will <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:13:36 +0100
    • Re: NTSC betamax players (70 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 08:45:23 -0400
    • Re: NTSC betamax players (99 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 08:23:47 -0700

65. NY area appraiser?
    • NY area appraiser? (22 lines)
      From: Andy Lanset <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:13:01 -0400
    • Re: NY area appraiser? (36 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:55:36 -0400

66. NY ARSC Meeting - 10/23 - 92nd Street Y
    • NY ARSC Meeting - 10/23 - 92nd Street Y (156 lines)
      From: Dave Nolan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:49:47 -0400

67. October Issue of Black Grooves
    • October Issue of Black Grooves (46 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:38:33 -0400

68. on record--presidential debates, 1908 style, first sound bites of presidential candidates
    • on record--presidential debates, 1908 style, first sound bites of presidential candidates (29 lines)
      From: Ron Cowen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 23:53:19 -0400

69. on record: presidential debates 1908 style
    • on record: presidential debates 1908 style (36 lines)
      From: Ron Cowen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 00:01:10 -0400
    • Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style (33 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 01:01:42 -0400
    • Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style (43 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 01:41:37 -0400
    • Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style (50 lines)
      From: Ron Cowen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 03:38:21 -0400
    • Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style (45 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 07:36:51 -0400
    • Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style (63 lines)
      From: Ron Cowen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 11:40:16 -0400
    • Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style (34 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 17:15:22 -0400
    • Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style (43 lines)
      From: Sam Brylawski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 18:25:34 -0400
    • Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style (42 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 18:37:09 -0400
    • Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style (68 lines)
      From: Ron Cowen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 20:25:12 -0400
    • Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style (47 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 22:28:50 -0400
    • Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style (34 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 19:41:12 -0700
    • Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style (52 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 23:27:14 -0400

70. on record: presidential debates 1908 style - The CD!!!
    • Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style - The CD!!! (38 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 15:47:31 EDT

71. Philco radio programs
    • Philco radio programs (20 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 18:59:08 -0400
    • Re: Philco radio programs (26 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 19:29:53 -0400

72. Poor sound of modern recordings thread
    • Poor sound of modern recordings thread (33 lines)
      From: Dave Radlauer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:45:36 EDT
    • Re: Poor sound of modern recordings thread (48 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:35:35 -0400
    • Re: Poor sound of modern recordings thread (62 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:37:09 -0700

73. Problems with List server?
    • Problems with List server? (74 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:01:10 -0400

74. Proper storage of mylar/acetate tapes
    • Proper storage of mylar/acetate tapes (64 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:35:22 -0400
    • Re: Proper storage of mylar/acetate tapes (125 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:08:22 -0700
    • Re: Proper storage of mylar/acetate tapes (103 lines)
      From: Sarah Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:13:38 -0500

75. proposal
    • proposal (89 lines)
      From: Karen C Lund <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:42:42 -0400
    • Re: proposal (23 lines)
      From: Karen C Lund <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:06:28 -0400

76. Purpose of ARSCList, was: looking for supplies
    • Purpose of ARSCList, was: looking for supplies (46 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:36:34 -0700
    • Re: Purpose of ARSCList, was: looking for supplies (100 lines)
      From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:53:08 -0700
    • Re: Purpose of ARSCList, was: looking for supplies (49 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:05:23 -0700
    • Re: Purpose of ARSCList, was: looking for supplies (60 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:35:46 -0700

77. Q on miking & mixing in the '30s & '40s
    • Q on miking & mixing in the '30s & '40s (18 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:11:45 -0400
    • Re: Q on miking & mixing in the '30s & '40s (28 lines)
      From: Michael H. Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:58:12 -0400

78. Radionette Multirecorder... track configuration, anyone?
    • Radionette Multirecorder... track configuration, anyone? (49 lines)
      From: Jacqueline von Arb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:32:30 +0200

79. RCA "X" label - 10inch series
    • RCA "X" label - 10inch series (23 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:43:42 -0400
    • Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series (33 lines)
      From: Michael Fitzgerald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:01:58 -0400
    • Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series (47 lines)
      From: Warren, Richard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:14:15 -0400
    • Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series (65 lines)
      From: Randy Watts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:47:37 -0700
    • Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series (25 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:26:42 -0400
    • Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series (25 lines)
      From: Michael Fitzgerald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:51:19 -0400
    • Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series (22 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 22:30:58 -0700

80. RCA "X" label - 10inch series Susan Reed
    • Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series Susan Reed (102 lines)
      From: Randy Watts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:40:36 -0700
    • Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series Susan Reed (62 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 00:45:21 -0400
    • Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series Susan Reed (91 lines)
      From: Randy Watts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:51:15 -0700
    • Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series Susan Reed (97 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 00:54:20 -0400

81. RCA 1950 custom pressing
    • RCA 1950 custom pressing (15 lines)
      From: Anthony Barnett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:00:53 +0100
    • Re: RCA 1950 custom pressing (25 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:06:25 -0400

82. Registration Deadline Extended! Disaster program, Greater Hudson Valley, NY
    • Registration Deadline Extended! Disaster program, Greater Hudson Valley, NY (114 lines)
      From: Andrews, Kim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:03:34 -0400

83. Rim Drive Reel to Reel Re: [ARSCLIST] Audograph disc
    • Rim Drive Reel to Reel Re: [ARSCLIST] Audograph disc (86 lines)
      From: Martin Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:45:10 -0500

84. San Francisco AV Media Preservation Program-Registration Deadline Approaching
    • San Francisco AV Media Preservation Program-Registration Deadline Approaching (103 lines)
      From: Andrews, Kim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:56:18 -0400

85. Sephardic music website
    • Sephardic music website (56 lines)
      From: Joel Bresler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:30:21 -0400

86. sleeves and jackets
    • sleeves and jackets (28 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:54:23 -0400

87. sleeves for 10 & 12" lacquers
    • sleeves for 10 & 12" lacquers (52 lines)
      From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:16:01 -0700
    • Re: sleeves for 10 & 12" lacquers (122 lines)
      From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:59:30 -0700

88. Software for Mac
    • Software for Mac (37 lines)
      From: Craig Breaden <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:47:56 -0400
    • Re: Software for Mac (58 lines)
      From: WIlliam McQuay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:58:00 -0400
    • Re: Software for Mac (71 lines)
      From: Malcolm Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:51:39 -0700
    • Re: Software for Mac (35 lines)
      From: Dave Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:43:57 -0700
    • Re: Software for Mac (117 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:13:39 -0700
    • Re: Software for Mac (124 lines)
      From: Craig Breaden <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:28:05 -0400
    • Re: Software for Mac (84 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:38:34 -0400
    • Re: Software for Mac (65 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:20:53 -0400
    • Re: Software for Mac (59 lines)
      From: Robert Cham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:27:22 -0500
    • Re: Software for Mac (150 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:30:32 -0400
    • Re: Software for Mac (25 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:53:09 -0500
    • Re: Software for Mac (51 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:25:17 -0400
    • Re: Software for Mac (127 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:30:25 -0700
    • Re: Software for Mac (33 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:32:41 -0700
    • Re: Software for Mac (26 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:35:41 -0700
    • Re: Software for Mac (192 lines)
      From: carlstephen koto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:32:34 -0700
    • Re: Software for Mac (27 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:35:07 -0700
    • Re: Software for Mac (165 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:17:06 -0400
    • Re: Software for Mac (57 lines)
      From: Peter Alyea <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:53:27 -0400
    • Re: Software for Mac (79 lines)
      From: Craig Breaden <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:47:45 -0400
    • Re: Software for Mac (70 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:35:13 -0400
    • Re: Software for Mac (115 lines)
      From: Peter Alyea <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:16:43 -0400
    • Re: Software for Mac (95 lines)
      From: Robert Cham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:51:41 -0500
    • Re: Software for Mac (51 lines)
      From: Robert Cham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:09:41 -0500
    • Re: Software for Mac (88 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:31:30 -0400
    • Re: Software for Mac (79 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:14:29 -0400
    • Re: Software for Mac (27 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:41:50 -0700
    • Re: Software for Mac (79 lines)
      From: carlstephen koto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:34:39 -0700
    • Re: Software for Mac (51 lines)
      From: Dave Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:23:53 -0700
    • Re: Software for Mac (99 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:00:27 -0400
    • Re: Software for Mac (76 lines)
      From: Dave Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:01:57 -0700

89. Software for Mac/speed change
    • Re: Software for Mac/speed change (122 lines)
      From: Dan Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:55:41 -0700

90. Sound card confusion
    • Sound card confusion (39 lines)
      From: Fliss, William <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:21:55 -0500
    • Re: Sound card confusion (38 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:12:59 -0700
    • Re: Sound card confusion (55 lines)
      From: Dale Francis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:26:10 -0400

91. Still seeking two articles
    • Still seeking two articles (26 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 09:29:31 -0400

92. This article on Taft-Bryan cylinders also has audio, great graphics, and features Patrick Feaster
    • This article on Taft-Bryan cylinders also has audio, great graphics, and features Patrick Feaster (51 lines)
      From: Ron Cowen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:09:36 -0400
    • This article on Taft-Bryan cylinders also has audio, great graphics, and features Patrick Feaster (22 lines)
      From: Ron Cowen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:11:58 -0400
    • Re: This article on Taft-Bryan cylinders also has audio, great graphics, and features Patrick Feaster (27 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:49:27 -0500
    • Re: This article on Taft-Bryan cylinders also has audio, great graphics, and features Patrick Feaster (30 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:50:12 -0500

93. transporting wax cylinders
    • transporting wax cylinders (53 lines)
      From: Mike Hirst <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:53:02 +0100
    • Re: transporting wax cylinders (16 lines)
      From: Jerry Fabris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:29:13 -0400
    • Re: transporting wax cylinders (32 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:07:12 -0700
    • Re: transporting wax cylinders (14 lines)
      From: Howard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:42:31 -0400
    • Re: transporting wax cylinders (34 lines)
      From: Alex Hartov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:49:55 -0400
    • Re: transporting wax cylinders (38 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 08:58:04 +0300
    • Re: transporting wax cylinders (23 lines)
      From: Jerry Fabris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 14:27:43 -0400

94. Two articles in today's Wall St. Journal worth Reading
    • Two articles in today's Wall St. Journal worth Reading (40 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:09:35 EDT
    • Re: Two articles in today's Wall St. Journal worth Reading (18 lines)
      From: Howard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:44:21 -0400
    • Re: Two articles in today's Wall St. Journal worth Reading (31 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:33:42 EDT
    • Re: Two articles in today's Wall St. Journal worth Reading (59 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:12:17 -0400
    • Re: Two articles in today's Wall St. Journal worth Reading (29 lines)
      From: Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:19:57 -0700

95. World Day for Audiovisual Heritage
    • World Day for Audiovisual Heritage (30 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:41:14 -0700

96. Yet another Everest reissue
    • Yet another Everest reissue (22 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:32:16 -0400