ARSCLIST Archives – February 2008

1. "Outro"
   • "Outro" (31 lines)
     From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:34:14 EST
   • Re: "Outro" (50 lines)
     From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:39:53 -0600
   • Re: "Outro" (15 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:41:40 GMT
   • Re: "Outro" (99 lines)
     From: Mark Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:08:43 -0500
   • Re: "Outro" (50 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:13:41 -0500
   • Re: "Outro" (19 lines)
     From: Barbara Need <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:46:07 -0600
   • Re: "Outro" (30 lines)
     From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:00:44 -0800
   • Re: "Outro" (31 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:09:30 -0500
   • Re: "Outro" (29 lines)
     From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:23:47 -0800
   • Re: "Outro" (28 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:35:08 -0500
   • Re: "Outro" (30 lines)
     From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:15:07 -0800

2. $437.72 for one lousy DVD?!
   • $437.72 for one lousy DVD?! (29 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:41:25 -0500

3. 16" transcription referral
   • 16" transcription referral (43 lines)
     From: Dave Radlauer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:21:35 EST

4. 1947 DISC Records Ethnic Series catalog]
   • 1947 DISC Records Ethnic Series catalog] (19 lines)
     From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:45:11 -0500

5. Alfred Bachelet
   • Alfred Bachelet (37 lines)
     From: Dave Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:01:19 -0800
   • Re: Alfred Bachelet (18 lines)
     From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:52:15 -0800

6. Ampex Tape Transport Programer
   • Ampex Tape Transport Programer (19 lines)
     From: Brent <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:59:43 -0500
   • Re: Ampex Tape Transport Programer (29 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:22:50 -0500
   • Re: Ampex Tape Transport Programer (32 lines)
     From: Robert J Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:27:40 -0500

7. An option for some folks wanting to put their vinyl into their computer
   • An option for some folks wanting to put their vinyl into their computer (21 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:53:19 -0500
   • Re: An option for some folks wanting to put their vinyl into their computer (35 lines)
     From: alessandro bellafiore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:40:43 +0100
   • Re: An option for some folks wanting to put their vinyl into their computer (34 lines)
     From: Douglas Small <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:39:37 -0500
   • Re: An option for some folks wanting to put their vinyl into their computer (34 lines)
     From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:52:52 -0500
   • Re: An option for some folks wanting to put their vinyl into their computer (34 lines)
     From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:57:01 -0800

8. Analog tape preservation project
   • Analog tape preservation project (37 lines)
     From: Gregorio G. Karman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:07:24 +0100
   • Re: Analog tape preservation project (53 lines)
     From: Sanders, Cynthia Blake <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:12:52 -0500
   • Re: Analog tape preservation project (98 lines)
     From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:36:45 -0800
   • Re: Analog tape preservation project (122 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:00:32 -0500
   • Re: Analog tape preservation project (145 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:15:09 -0500
   • Re: Analog tape preservation project (46 lines)
     From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:46:05 -0500

9. analog to digital converter question
   • analog to digital converter question (23 lines)
     From: Douglas Small <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:12:51 -0500
   • Re: analog to digital converter question (121 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:25:41 -0500
   • Re: analog to digital converter question (36 lines)
     From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 08:31:03 -0800
   • Re: analog to digital converter question (41 lines)
     From: Dan Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:30:45 -0800
   • Re: analog to digital converter question (41 lines)
     From: Dan Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:30:44 -0800
   • Re: analog to digital converter question (60 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 17:45:08 -0500
   • Re: analog to digital converter question (44 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 17:48:02 -0500
   • Re: analog to digital converter question (42 lines)
     From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:28:14 -0500
   • Re: analog to digital converter question (144 lines)
     From: carlstephen koto <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:48:48 -0800
   • Re: analog to digital converter question (49 lines)
     From: Doug Pomeroy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:02:33 -0500
   • Re: analog to digital converter question (22 lines)
     From: Jeff Carroll <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:54:16 -0500
   • Re: analog to digital converter question (43 lines)
     From: alessandro bellafiore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:30:23 +0100
   • Re: analog to digital converter question (54 lines)
     From: alessandro bellafiore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 17:47:35 +0100
   • Re: analog to digital converter question (53 lines)
     From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 20:17:11 -0800

10. analog to digital converter question, pt 2
    • Re: analog to digital converter question, pt 2 (171 lines)
      From: Douglas Small <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:04:29 -0500
    • Re: analog to digital converter question, pt 2 (54 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:02:29 -0500
    • Re: analog to digital converter question, pt 2 (162 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:14:41 -0500
    • Re: analog to digital converter question, pt 2 (29 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:02:11 +0200

11. Arctic-relevant recordings
    • Arctic-relevant recordings (39 lines)
      From: Art Shifrin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:12:33 -0500
    • Re: Arctic-relevant recordings (47 lines)
      From: Jack Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 02:13:55 -0500
    • Re: Arctic-relevant recordings (61 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 07:52:33 -0500

12. Argo "The Poets Speak" series -- ever reissued on CD?
    • Argo "The Poets Speak" series -- ever reissued on CD? (17 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 08:25:51 -0500
    • Re: Argo "The Poets Speak" series -- ever reissued on CD? (26 lines)
      From: carlstephen koto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:55:13 -0800
    • Re: Argo "The Poets Speak" series -- ever reissued on CD? (46 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:04:57 -0500

13. ARSC Conference 2008
    • ARSC Conference 2008 (171 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 23:21:26 -0500

14. ARSC Conference 2008 -- Early Registration Deadline Approaching
    • ARSC Conference 2008 -- Early Registration Deadline Approaching (94 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:05:29 -0500

15. ARSC Memberships 2008
    • ARSC Memberships 2008 (81 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:16:36 -0500

16. ARSC Pre-Conference Workshop 2008
    • ARSC Pre-Conference Workshop 2008 (154 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:21:11 -0500

17. Beatrice Lillie
    • Beatrice Lillie (27 lines)
      From: Art Shifrin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:53:51 -0500

18. Benno Moiseiwitsch question
    • Benno Moiseiwitsch question (18 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:48:54 -0500
    • Re: Benno Moiseiwitsch question (26 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:54:47 -0500
    • Re: Benno Moiseiwitsch question (37 lines)
      From: Nigel Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:02:25 +0700

19. Bias frequencies and their recovery (was Digital File Specs and StoryCorps)
    • Re: Bias frequencies and their recovery (was Digital File Specs and StoryCorps) (91 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:23:39 -0500

20. Bolshoi Russlan
    • Bolshoi Russlan (26 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:03:32 -0500
    • Re: Bolshoi Russlan (39 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:34:20 -0800
    • Re: Bolshoi Russlan (34 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:42:39 -0500
    • Re: Bolshoi Russlan (55 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:36:11 -0000
    • Re: Bolshoi Russlan (51 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:25:03 -0500
    • Re: Bolshoi Russlan (60 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:41:40 -0500

21. BWAV metadata editor
    • BWAV metadata editor (20 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:41:18 -0500
    • Re: BWAV metadata editor (47 lines)
      From: Jacqueline von Arb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 03:07:33 +0100

22. Can anyone recommend PROPERLY reissued (no pseudo stereo, no echo added, no gating)
    • Can anyone recommend PROPERLY reissued (no pseudo stereo, no echo added, no gating) (20 lines)
      From: Art Shifrin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:35:00 -0500

23. Classic Record Collector magazine
    • Re: Classic Record Collector magazine (41 lines)
      From: Jim Long <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:25:08 EST
    • Re: Classic Record Collector magazine (57 lines)
      From: David Gnau <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:10:26 -0500
    • Re: Classic Record Collector magazine (60 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:17:17 -0500
    • Re: Classic Record Collector magazine (71 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:23:58 -0500
    • Re: Classic Record Collector magazine (93 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:01:48 -0500
    • Re: Classic Record Collector magazine (49 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:07:16 -0800
    • Re: Classic Record Collector magazine (74 lines)
      From: Mark Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:35:49 -0500

24. Closet shelving for LP Records
    • Closet shelving for LP Records (64 lines)
      From: michael <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:01:49 -0500
    • Re: Closet shelving for LP Records (30 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:41:18 -0500
    • Re: Closet shelving for LP Records (117 lines)
      From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:14:38 -0800
    • Re: Closet shelving for LP Records (193 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:28:22 -0800
    • Re: Closet shelving for LP Records (135 lines)
      From: Douglas Small <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:18:33 -0500
    • Re: Closet shelving for LP Records (95 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:55:06 -0500
    • Re: Closet shelving for LP Records (174 lines)
      From: Douglas Small <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:33:55 -0500
    • Re: Closet shelving for LP Records (35 lines)
      From: michael <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:54:36 -0500

25. Cole Transcription Library
    • Cole Transcription Library (20 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:57:23 -0800
    • Re: Cole Transcription Library (28 lines)
      From: Paul Tyler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:02:51 -0800
    • Re: Cole Transcription Library (30 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:03:24 -0500
    • Re: Cole Transcription Library (31 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:28:54 -0800
    • Re: Cole Transcription Library (44 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:01:57 -0500

26. Collection for sale
    • Collection for sale (16 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:37:54 -0800
    • Re: Collection for sale (34 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:55:38 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (45 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:30:04 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (26 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:41:17 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (38 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:13:15 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (47 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:53:39 -0800
    • Re: Collection for sale (37 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:32:06 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (36 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:37:15 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (27 lines)
      From: Cindy Stockard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:47:13 -0800
    • Re: Collection for sale (43 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:21:22 -0600
    • Re: Collection for sale (47 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:48:33 -0800
    • Re: Collection for sale (51 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:50:37 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (58 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:00:53 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (58 lines)
      From: Jon Noring <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:11:37 -0700
    • Re: Collection for sale (68 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:34:46 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (23 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:12:11 EST
    • Re: Collection for sale (24 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:22:04 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (37 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:27:46 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (49 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:17:15 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (59 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:56:28 -0600
    • Re: Collection for sale (66 lines)
      From: Rafi Sofer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:17:49 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (69 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:29:37 -0800
    • Re: Collection for sale (70 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:04:52 -0600
    • Re: Collection for sale (77 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:06:34 -0600
    • Re: Collection for sale (82 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:18:13 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (86 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:34:51 -0800
    • Re: Collection for sale (73 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:40:10 -0600
    • Re: Collection for sale (52 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:50:17 -0800
    • Re: Collection for sale (105 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:52:03 -0600
    • Re: Collection for sale (32 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:58:00 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (85 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:14:16 -0800
    • Re: Collection for sale (104 lines)
      From: Malcolm Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:22:28 -1000
    • Re: Collection for sale (125 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:04:56 -0600
    • Re: Collection for sale (143 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:18:39 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (135 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:55:19 -0800
    • Re: Collection for sale (157 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:10:38 -0600
    • Re: Collection for sale (181 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:59:00 -0800
    • Re: Collection for sale (169 lines)
      From: carlstephen koto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:11:01 -0800
    • Re: Collection for sale (180 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:31:51 -0800
    • Re: Collection for sale (217 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:01:20 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (211 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:43:40 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (118 lines)
      From: carlstephen koto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:36:54 -0800
    • Re: Collection for sale (128 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:18:46 -0500
    • Re: Collection for sale (227 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:59:47 -0800
    • Re: Collection for sale (131 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:11:20 -0800

27. Comment sticker notes on records
    • Comment sticker notes on records (32 lines)
      From: Dr. Cheryl Thurber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:35:18 -0800

28. Conference Hotel Sold Out!
    • Conference Hotel Sold Out! (35 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:48:11 -0500

29. Conference Roommate List & Hotel Update
    • Conference Roommate List & Hotel Update (27 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:53:25 -0500

30. Cutouts- was Maybe...
    • Re: Cutouts- was Maybe... (69 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:49:03 -0500

31. David Bonner
    • David Bonner (16 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:59:47 -0500
    • Re: David Bonner (23 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:00:31 -0800
    • Re: David Bonner (45 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:11:29 -0500
    • Re: David Bonner (67 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:20:34 -0500
    • Re: David Bonner (77 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:33:20 -0500
    • Re: David Bonner (77 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:34:15 -0500
    • Re: David Bonner (95 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:11:29 -0500

32. DAW computer
    • DAW computer (27 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:13:08 -0500
    • Re: DAW computer (45 lines)
      From: Martin Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:30:28 -0600
    • Re: DAW computer (72 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:54:51 -0800

33. Digital File Specs and StoryCorps
    • Digital File Specs and StoryCorps (48 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:31:37 -0500
    • Re: Digital File Specs and StoryCorps (38 lines)
      From: Jon Noring <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:03:21 -0700
    • Re: Digital File Specs and StoryCorps (91 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:10:47 -0500
    • Re: Digital File Specs and StoryCorps (26 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:18:20 -0500
    • Re: Digital File Specs and StoryCorps (75 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:42:06 -0500
    • Re: Digital File Specs and StoryCorps (101 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:14:22 -0500
    • Re: Digital File Specs and StoryCorps (57 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:29:01 -0800
    • Re: Digital File Specs and StoryCorps (62 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:45:54 -0500
    • Re: Digital File Specs and StoryCorps (27 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:56:39 -0600
    • Re: Digital File Specs and StoryCorps (29 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:03:35 -0500

34. Discography help needed -- pre-Mercury Howard Hanson
    • Discography help needed -- pre-Mercury Howard Hanson (21 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:05:24 -0500
    • Re: Discography help needed -- pre-Mercury Howard Hanson (41 lines)
      From: Douglas Small <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:13:06 -0500
    • Re: Discography help needed -- pre-Mercury Howard Hanson (56 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:50:59 -0500
    • Re: Discography help needed -- pre-Mercury Howard Hanson (98 lines)
      From: Michael Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:23:26 -0500
    • Re: Discography help needed -- pre-Mercury Howard Hanson (34 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:17:36 -0800
    • Re: Discography help needed -- pre-Mercury Howard Hanson (49 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:00:40 -0500
    • Re: Discography help needed -- pre-Mercury Howard Hanson (108 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:02:26 -0800
    • Re: Discography help needed -- pre-Mercury Howard Hanson (67 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:23:09 -0500
    • Re: Discography help needed -- pre-Mercury Howard Hanson (112 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:24:35 -0500
    • Re: Discography help needed -- pre-Mercury Howard Hanson (77 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:44:47 -0800

35. Do any of you require test tones?
    • Do any of you require test tones? (23 lines)
      From: Art Shifrin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 11:18:13 -0500
    • Re: Do any of you require test tones? (30 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 08:39:35 -0800
    • Re: Do any of you require test tones? (35 lines)
      From: Doug Pomeroy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:29:25 -0500
    • Re: Do any of you require test tones? (47 lines)
      From: carlstephen koto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:25:10 -0800
    • Re: Do any of you require test tones? (29 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:23:48 -0500
    • Re: Do any of you require test tones? (39 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:32:08 -0600

36. ebay recs.
    • ebay recs. (29 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:58:27 GMT
    • Re: ebay recs. (30 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:37:11 -0500
    • Re: ebay recs. (36 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:18:00 -0800
    • Re: ebay recs. (38 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:20:37 -0800
    • Re: ebay recs. (45 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:31:18 -0500
    • Re: ebay recs. (56 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:47:25 -0800
    • Re: ebay recs. (67 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:06:36 -0500

37. Fairchild 654 Compatilizer -- what is this thing?
    • Fairchild 654 Compatilizer -- what is this thing? (21 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:36:59 -0500
    • Re: Fairchild 654 Compatilizer -- what is this thing? (42 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:18:27 -0500
    • Re: Fairchild 654 Compatilizer -- what is this thing? (48 lines)
      From: carlstephen koto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:14:52 -0800
    • Re: Fairchild 654 Compatilizer -- what is this thing? (59 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:28:31 -0500
    • Re: Fairchild 654 Compatilizer -- what is this thing? (66 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:17:46 -0600
    • Re: Fairchild 654 Compatilizer -- what is this thing? (83 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:44:49 -0500

38. February Issue of Black Grooves
    • February Issue of Black Grooves (53 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:36:43 -0500

39. Friend's
    • Friend's (20 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 23:13:00 -0500
    • Re: Friend's (26 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:10:49 -0800
    • Friend's (17 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 10:01:05 -0500

40. Fw: extension of copyright
    • Fw: extension of copyright (144 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:45:50 -0000

41. Fwd: New word? / technical term?
    • Fwd: New word? / technical term? (30 lines)
      From: Barbara Need <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:54:16 -0600
    • Re: Fwd: New word? / technical term? (41 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:03:08 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: New word? / technical term? (33 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:18:01 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: New word? / technical term? (57 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:18:56 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: New word? / technical term? (70 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:57:11 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: New word? / technical term? (70 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:10:03 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: New word? / technical term? (36 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:23:49 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: New word? / technical term? (86 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:27:53 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: New word? / technical term? (35 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:13:12 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: New word? / technical term? (64 lines)
      From: Lou Houck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:17:54 -0600
    • Re: Fwd: New word? / technical term? (34 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:25:40 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: New word? / technical term? (55 lines)
      From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:45:54 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: New word? / technical term? (61 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:57:21 -0500

42. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] "Outro"
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] "Outro" (124 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:37:07 EST
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] "Outro" (58 lines)
      From: Mark Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:30:16 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] "Outro" (125 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:58:17 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] "Outro" (27 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:38:06 EST

43. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Collection for sale
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Collection for sale (43 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:11:09 EST

44. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Kurtz date
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Kurtz date (98 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:55:05 EST
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Kurtz date (98 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:15:19 -0800

45. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Kurtz date
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Kurtz date (76 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:37:56 EST
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Kurtz date (72 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:09:37 EST
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Kurtz date (72 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:02:15 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Kurtz date (83 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:20:21 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Kurtz date (92 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:05:32 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Kurtz date (21 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:27:29 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Kurtz date (30 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:56:37 EST
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Kurtz date (38 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 19:19:48 -0500

46. George Bernard Shaw recording
    • Re: George Bernard Shaw recording (67 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:01:44 +0000
    • Re: George Bernard Shaw recording (88 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:57:53 -0500
    • Re: George Bernard Shaw recording (81 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 19:10:44 -0500

47. Good news about Classic Record Collector magazine
    • Good news about Classic Record Collector magazine (26 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:59:02 -0500
    • Re: Good news about Classic Record Collector magazine (37 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:47:23 -0500

48. Grammophone/album hole
    • Grammophone/album hole (24 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:47:48 GMT
    • Re: Grammophone/album hole (26 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:05:15 -0800

49. great article about Dorian Recordings and Sono Luminus
    • great article about Dorian Recordings and Sono Luminus (23 lines)
      From: Suzanne Konefal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:09:28 -0500

50. Important - if paying ARSC Dues via Paypal
    • Important - if paying ARSC Dues via Paypal (26 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:59:49 EST
    • Re: Important - if paying ARSC Dues via Paypal (29 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:03:28 -0500
    • Re: Important - if paying ARSC Dues via Paypal (39 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:01:22 +0200
    • Re: Important - if paying ARSC Dues via Paypal (41 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:15:54 -0500
    • Re: Important - if paying ARSC Dues via Paypal (48 lines)
      From: Sam Brylawski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:31:39 -0500
    • Re: Important - if paying ARSC Dues via Paypal (21 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 18:30:12 +0200
    • Re: Important - if paying ARSC Dues via Paypal (32 lines)
      From: alessandro bellafiore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:50:04 +0100
    • Re: Important - if paying ARSC Dues via Paypal (46 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:23:45 EST

51. indonesian record contacts
    • indonesian record contacts (26 lines)
      From: Ian Nagoski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 01:50:09 -0800

52. jazz record covers
    • jazz record covers (27 lines)
      From: Francesco Martinelli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:44:25 +0100
    • Re: jazz record covers (36 lines)
      From: Daniel Shiman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:37:13 +0000
    • Re: jazz record covers (58 lines)
      From: Francesco Martinelli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:10:04 +0100

53. KDKA broadcast recordings?
    • KDKA broadcast recordings? (62 lines)
      From: Fred Calabretta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:57:16 -0500
    • Re: KDKA broadcast recordings? (101 lines)
      From: Matthew Barton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:50:33 -0500

54. Kurtz
    • Kurtz (26 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:32:46 -0800
    • Re: Kurtz (35 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 19:19:09 -0500
    • Re: Kurtz (24 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 02:05:17 +0100

55. Kurtz date
    • Kurtz date (20 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:30:10 -0500
    • Re: Kurtz date (35 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:13:45 -0500
    • Re: Kurtz date (47 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:20:28 -0500
    • Re: Kurtz date (74 lines)
      From: Mark Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:57:17 -0500

56. Lale Andersen
    • Lale Andersen (173 lines)
      From: Birgit Lotz Verlag <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:45:58 +0100
    • Re: Lale Andersen (189 lines)
      From: Nigel Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:39:35 +0700
    • Re: Lale Andersen (33 lines)
      From: Susan T Stinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:39:35 -0500

57. LC Record Cleaning Solution
    • LC Record Cleaning Solution (28 lines)
      From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:26:26 -0600
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution (50 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:35:58 -0800
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution (42 lines)
      From: Jos Van Dyck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:36:29 +0100
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution (40 lines)
      From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 03:11:37 -0600
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution (59 lines)
      From: Eugene DeAnna <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:55:54 -0500
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution (69 lines)
      From: Martin Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:25:40 -0600
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution (51 lines)
      From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:55:45 -0600
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution (74 lines)
      From: Eugene DeAnna <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:06:32 -0500
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution (89 lines)
      From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:43:40 -0600
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution (104 lines)
      From: Andy Lanset <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:49:19 -0500
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution (37 lines)
      From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:34:14 -0600
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution (52 lines)
      From: Dan Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:55:57 -0800

58. LC Record Cleaning Solution (Tergitol)
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution (Tergitol) (63 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:21:03 -0800
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution (Tergitol) (18 lines)
      From: Howard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:33:35 -0500
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution (Tergitol) (95 lines)
      From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:06:35 -0600
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution (Tergitol) (27 lines)
      From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:55:42 -0600
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution (Tergitol) (113 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:11:22 -0500

59. LC Record Cleaning Solution/TergitolT 15-S-7 surfactant
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution/TergitolT 15-S-7 surfactant (32 lines)
      From: Dan Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:07:29 -0800
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution/TergitolT 15-S-7 surfactant (40 lines)
      From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:46:38 -0500
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution/TergitolT 15-S-7 surfactant (56 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:00:32 -0500
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution/TergitolT 15-S-7 surfactant (30 lines)
      From: Dan Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:37:51 -0800
    • Re: LC Record Cleaning Solution/TergitolT 15-S-7 surfactant (61 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:13:50 -0600

60. Lease vs buy
    • Lease vs buy (55 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:57:55 -0500
    • Re: Lease vs buy (56 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:53:02 -0500

61. Lenny's piano solos
    • Lenny's piano solos (18 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:59:19 -0500

62. Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie
    • Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (21 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:34:50 -0500
    • Re: Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (57 lines)
      From: Jim Long <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:29:00 EST
    • Re: Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (95 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:22:50 -0500
    • Re: Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (33 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:35:15 -0500
    • Re: Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (75 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:53:58 -0500
    • Re: Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (91 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:20:25 -0000
    • Re: Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (28 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:06:02 -0500
    • Re: Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (36 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:45:56 -0500
    • Re: Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (42 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:52:10 -0500
    • Re: Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (33 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:11:15 -0500
    • Re: Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (39 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:35:53 -0000
    • Re: Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (50 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:58:59 -0500
    • Re: Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (37 lines)
      From: Nigel Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:55:56 +0700
    • Re: Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (50 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:10:09 -0500
    • Re: Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (22 lines)
      From: Paul Charosh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 05:38:03 EST
    • Re: Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (78 lines)
      From: Nigel Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:51:38 +0700
    • Re: Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (56 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:08:43 -0500
    • Liberty Music Shop - Beatrice Lillie (34 lines)
      From: Art Shifrin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:26:44 -0500

63. Library of Congress NAVCC job opening
    • Library of Congress NAVCC job opening (57 lines)
      From: Stephen C Leggett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:01:25 -0500
    • Re: Library of Congress NAVCC job opening (38 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:18:42 -0500

64. Library Wind tape modes and long-term tape storage
    • Library Wind tape modes and long-term tape storage (30 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:28:46 -0500
    • Re: Library Wind tape modes and long-term tape storage (65 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:00:28 -0600
    • Re: Library Wind tape modes and long-term tape storage (97 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:47:03 -0500

65. LP cuts list needed, 3LP set on Archiv
    • LP cuts list needed, 3LP set on Archiv (21 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:15:31 -0500
    • Re: LP cuts list needed, 3LP set on Archiv (34 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:45:46 -0500
    • Re: LP cuts list needed, 3LP set on Archiv (43 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:26:36 -0800

66. LP sized scanner
    • LP sized scanner (24 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:02:13 -0500
    • Re: LP sized scanner (47 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:19:57 -0500
    • Re: LP sized scanner (70 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:44:41 -0500
    • Re: LP sized scanner (35 lines)
      From: Malcolm Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:45:51 -1000
    • Re: LP sized scanner (63 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:49:43 -0500
    • Re: LP sized scanner (29 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:51:19 -0500
    • Re: LP sized scanner (55 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:57:31 -0500
    • Re: LP sized scanner (45 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:59:59 -0500
    • Re: LP sized scanner (82 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:06:25 -0800
    • Re: LP sized scanner (33 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:11:26 -0800
    • Re: LP sized scanner (96 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:06:03 -0500
    • Re: LP sized scanner (47 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:48:20 -0500
    • Re: LP sized scanner (31 lines)
      From: Bruce Kinch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:09:44 -0700
    • Re: LP sized scanner (39 lines)
      From: Bruce Kinch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:16:10 -0700
    • Re: LP sized scanner (26 lines)
      From: Bruce Kinch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:18:01 -0700
    • Re: LP sized scanner (26 lines)
      From: Bruce Kinch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:21:17 -0700
    • Re: LP sized scanner (44 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:38:27 -0500
    • Re: LP sized scanner (80 lines)
      From: Bruce Kinch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:42:28 -0700
    • Re: LP sized scanner (92 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:05:07 -0500
    • Re: LP sized scanner (25 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:08:50 -0500
    • Re: LP sized scanner (28 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:29:21 -0800
    • Re: LP sized scanner (28 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:29:21 -0800
    • Re: LP sized scanner (31 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:31:08 -0800
    • Re: LP sized scanner (46 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:47:40 -0500
    • Re: LP sized scanner (32 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:13:05 -0500
    • Re: LP sized scanner (29 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:39:25 -0500
    • Re: LP sized scanner (32 lines)
      From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:39:12 -0500

67. LP sized scanner that does the job
    • Re: LP sized scanner that does the job (115 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:41:18 -0500

68. Mahler records needed
    • Mahler records needed (28 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:38:25 -0500
    • Re: Mahler records needed (13 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:40:06 GMT
    • Re: Mahler records needed (21 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:49:06 -0500

69. Maybe a stupid question...
    • Maybe a stupid question... (29 lines)
      From: alessandro bellafiore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:17:45 +0100
    • Re: Maybe a stupid question... (41 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:23:00 -0000
    • Re: Maybe a stupid question... (67 lines)
      From: Robert J Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:57:50 -0500
    • Re: Maybe a stupid question... (76 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:52:54 -0500
    • Re: Maybe a stupid question... (54 lines)
      From: Bruce Kinch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:28:21 -0700
    • Re: Maybe a stupid question... (53 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:54:30 -0800
    • Re: Maybe a stupid question... (59 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:02:02 -0600
    • Re: Maybe a stupid question... (74 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:18:42 -0000
    • Re: Maybe a stupid question... (79 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:14:47 -0500
    • Re: Maybe a stupid question... (30 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:56:15 -0500
    • Re: Maybe a stupid question... (41 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:09:24 -0800

70. Morton J. Savada, 85, Seller of 78-R.P.M. Records, Dies
    • Morton J. Savada, 85, Seller of 78-R.P.M. Records, Dies (84 lines)
      From: Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:16:17 -0500
    • Re: Morton J. Savada, 85, Seller of 78-R.P.M. Records, Dies (111 lines)
      From: Andy Lanset <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:15:15 -0500

71. Muza for the Soviet market ?
    • Muza for the Soviet market ? (22 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:13:48 -0800

72. Need to ID the maker of a transcription-size turntable
    • Re: Need to ID the maker of a transcription-size turntable (57 lines)
      From: rodbrown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:28:19 -0800

73. Never a proofreader around when you need one
    • Never a proofreader around when you need one (19 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:54:06 -0500
    • Re: Never a proofreader around when you need one (15 lines)
      From: rodbrown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:41:49 -0800

74. New auction list now available
    • New auction list now available (58 lines)
      From: Hawthorn's Antique Audio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:26:46 -0800
    • Re: New auction list now available (71 lines)
      From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:13:30 +1300

75. NON-serious reply to: Fairchild 654 Compatilizer -- what is this thing?
    • NON-serious reply to: Fairchild 654 Compatilizer -- what is this thing? (42 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:36:55 -0500

76. Odd late 78
    • Odd late 78 (52 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:18:44 -0500
    • Re: Odd late 78 (71 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:53:47 -0800
    • Re: Odd late 78 (96 lines)
      From: Jack Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:54:12 -0500

77. One format war now decided?
    • One format war now decided? (22 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 07:21:49 -0500
    • Re: One format war now decided? (32 lines)
      From: Malcolm Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 07:33:41 -1000
    • Re: One format war now decided? (39 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:42:31 -0500
    • Re: One format war now decided? (33 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:46:24 -0600
    • Re: One format war now decided? (41 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:52:27 -0500
    • Re: One format war now decided? (42 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:58:46 -0600
    • Re: One format war now decided? (52 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:00:10 -0600
    • Re: One format war now decided? (34 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:02:06 -0500
    • Re: One format war now decided? (59 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:07:22 -0500
    • Re: One format war now decided? (45 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:12:53 -0600
    • Re: One format war now decided? (72 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:13:43 -0600
    • Re: One format war now decided? (63 lines)
      From: Steve Puntolillo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:30:54 -0500
    • Re: One format war now decided? (19 lines)
      From: Ernie Longmire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:45:42 -0800
    • Re: One format war now decided? (28 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:55:08 -0600
    • Re: One format war now decided? (41 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:07:47 -0500

78. Optical disc "repair"
    • Optical disc "repair" (40 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:01:50 -0500
    • Re: Optical disc "repair" (62 lines)
      From: Jerry Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:43:29 -0500
    • Re: Optical disc "repair" (100 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:17:36 +0100
    • Re: Optical disc "repair" (68 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:35:14 -0500
    • Re: Optical disc "repair" (53 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 00:32:19 +0000
    • Re: Optical disc "repair" (35 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:31:38 -0800

79. OT? Need to ID the maker of a transcription-size turntable
    • OT? Need to ID the maker of a transcription-size turntable (42 lines)
      From: rodbrown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 02:04:21 -0800
    • Re: OT? Need to ID the maker of a transcription-size turntable (54 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 08:45:48 -0500
    • Re: OT? Need to ID the maker of a transcription-size turntable (35 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:08:47 -0800
    • Re: OT? Need to ID the maker of a transcription-size turntable (49 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:53:57 -0600
    • Re: OT? Need to ID the maker of a transcription-size turntable (57 lines)
      From: carlstephen koto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:40:34 -0800
    • Re: OT? Need to ID the maker of a transcription-size turntable (49 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:41:28 -0600
    • Re: OT? Need to ID the maker of a transcription-size turntable (32 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:30:11 -0800
    • Re: OT? Need to ID the maker of a transcription-size turntable (40 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:35:02 -0800

80. Outro
    • Outro (17 lines)
      From: Barbara Need <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:17:07 -0600
    • Re: Outro (37 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:49:15 -0600
    • Re: Outro (50 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:20:06 -0500

81. Paul Mawhinney
    • Paul Mawhinney (15 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:56:10 -0500

82. Philips U.S. releases in the 60's
    • Philips U.S. releases in the 60's (31 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:34:04 -0500
    • Re: Philips U.S. releases in the 60's (55 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:49:16 -0500
    • Re: Philips U.S. releases in the 60's (21 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:19:24 -0500
    • Re: Philips U.S. releases in the 60's (71 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:43:47 -0800
    • Re: Philips U.S. releases in the 60's (92 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:57:20 -0500
    • Re: Philips U.S. releases in the 60's (101 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:05:44 -0800
    • Re: Philips U.S. releases in the 60's (128 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:20:58 -0500
    • Re: Philips U.S. releases in the 60's (118 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:26:05 -0500
    • Re: Philips U.S. releases in the 60's (149 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:17:09 -0500
    • Re: Philips U.S. releases in the 60's (21 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:56:01 -0500
    • Re: Philips U.S. releases in the 60's (30 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:55:40 -0500
    • Re: Philips U.S. releases in the 60's (159 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:39:27 -0800
    • Re: Philips U.S. releases in the 60's (75 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:16:12 -0500
    • Re: Philips U.S. releases in the 60's (54 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:19:58 -0800
    • Re: Philips U.S. releases in the 60's (169 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:09:08 -0600

83. pinning of oxide to plastic leader - best practice
    • pinning of oxide to plastic leader - best practice (84 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:55:36 -0800
    • Re: pinning of oxide to plastic leader - best practice (74 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:15:01 -0500
    • Re: pinning of oxide to plastic leader - best practice (92 lines)
      From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:02:52 +1300
    • Re: pinning of oxide to plastic leader - best practice (103 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:33:55 -0500
    • Re: pinning of oxide to plastic leader - best practice (39 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 05:55:56 -0800
    • Re: pinning of oxide to plastic leader - best practice (31 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:13:04 -0600
    • Re: pinning of oxide to plastic leader - best practice (56 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:43:16 -0800
    • Re: pinning of oxide to plastic leader - best practice (27 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:55:57 -0800
    • Re: pinning of oxide to plastic leader - best practice (67 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:57:59 -0500
    • Re: pinning of oxide to plastic leader - best practice (33 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:22:56 -0800

84. Premier/Mercury recs.
    • Premier/Mercury recs. (16 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:46:05 GMT

85. Question about a calypso record,and those on it.
    • Question about a calypso record,and those on it. (26 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:22:27 -0800
    • Re: Question about a calypso record,and those on it. (45 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:17:26 -0500
    • Re: Question about a calypso record,and those on it. (52 lines)
      From: Nigel Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:00:53 +0700
    • Re: Question about a calypso record,and those on it. (60 lines)
      From: Nigel Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:02:19 +0700
    • Re: Question about a calypso record,and those on it. (71 lines)
      From: Nigel Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:04:24 +0700
    • Re: Question about a calypso record,and those on it. (105 lines)
      From: Michael Eldridge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:19:01 -0800
    • Re: Question about a calypso record,and those on it. (61 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:04:49 -0800
    • Re: Question about a calypso record,and those on it. (85 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:11:57 -0800

86. Reminder: ARSC Research Grants Program
    • Reminder: ARSC Research Grants Program (95 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:12:26 -0500

87. SADIE goes into recievership
    • SADIE goes into recievership (50 lines)
      From: Dave Nolan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:33:33 -0500

88. Schoor? Schorr?
    • Schoor? Schorr? (18 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:08:55 -0500
    • Re: Schoor? Schorr? (28 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:30:02 -0500
    • Re: Schoor? Schorr? (44 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:49:10 -0500
    • Re: Schoor? Schorr? (64 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:36:50 +0100
    • Re: Schoor? Schorr? (21 lines)
      From: Howard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:48:37 -0500
    • Re: Schoor? Schorr? (25 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:26:07 -0800

89. Setting bias and EQ on ANY recorder
    • Re: Setting bias and EQ on ANY recorder (39 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:37:46 -0500
    • Re: Setting bias and EQ on ANY recorder (99 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:11:47 -0500
    • Re: Setting bias and EQ on ANY recorder (123 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 10:46:56 -0500

90. Setting bias and EQ on Technics 1520
    • Re: Setting bias and EQ on Technics 1520 (68 lines)
      From: carlstephen koto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:12:50 -0800
    • Re: Setting bias and EQ on Technics 1520 (89 lines)
      From: Jim Long <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:15:41 EST

91. Setting bias on any tape recorder
    • Re: Setting bias on any tape recorder (76 lines)
      From: Doug Pomeroy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:04:05 -0500

92. Some more Toscanini dates please?
    • Some more Toscanini dates please? (29 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:16:25 -0500
    • Re: Some more Toscanini dates please? (56 lines)
      From: Jim Long <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:04:26 EST
    • Re: Some more Toscanini dates please? (70 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:15:27 -0500

93. Some potential bad news ...
    • Some potential bad news ... (38 lines)
      From: Michael H. Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:18:54 -0500
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (20 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:40:31 -0600
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (38 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:55:14 -0500
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (74 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:23:11 -0000
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (58 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:18:24 -0600
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (62 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:48:00 -0500
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (70 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:09:35 -0500
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (29 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:13:23 -0600
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (95 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:18:38 -0500
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (95 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:27:31 -0500
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (22 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:20:42 -0500
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (47 lines)
      From: Dan Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:23:15 -0800
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (45 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:39:33 -0500
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (49 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:46:25 -0500
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (34 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:11:49 -0600
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (31 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:18:55 -0600
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (40 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:43:29 -0800
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (47 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:31:49 +0000
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (79 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:46:16 -0500
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (42 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:39:16 -0600
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (69 lines)
      From: Nigel Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:48:56 +0700
    • Re: Some potential bad news ... (42 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:20:46 -0500

94. Song lists needed -- Christmas albums
    • Song lists needed -- Christmas albums (26 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:46:35 -0500

95. Steel shelving
    • Re: Steel shelving (84 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:12:27 -0500
    • Re: Steel shelving (36 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:15:33 -0500

96. Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] TO DAVID LEWIS: Re: Tradition/Everest/Vanguard Classics/Bernie Solomon
    • Re: Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] TO DAVID LEWIS: Re: Tradition/Everest/Vanguard Classics/Bernie Solomon (95 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:10:42 -0500

97. Tape baking in St. Louis
    • Tape baking in St. Louis (36 lines)
      From: Steve Puntolillo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:53:39 -0500

98. Tape Problems was Re: [ARSCLIST] Collection for sale
    • Re: Tape Problems was Re: [ARSCLIST] Collection for sale (200 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:50:46 -0800

99. Tape problems, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Collection for sale
    • Tape problems, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Collection for sale (132 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:49:39 -0500
    • Re: Tape problems, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Collection for sale (136 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:35:37 -0500
    • Re: Tape problems, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Collection for sale (67 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:55:11 -0500
    • Re: Tape problems, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Collection for sale (195 lines)
      From: carlstephen koto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:52:46 -0800

100. TAPE publishes overview of audio and video carriers
     • TAPE publishes overview of audio and video carriers (50 lines)
       From: Ecpa e-mail <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:27:07 +0100

101. TAPE workshop on the curation and preservation of audiovisual collections, Glasgow, UK, 12-16 May 2008
     • TAPE workshop on the curation and preservation of audiovisual collections, Glasgow, UK, 12-16 May 2008 (121 lines)
       From: Ecpa e-mail <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:18:05 +0100
     • Re: TAPE workshop on the curation and preservation of audiovisual collections, Glasgow, UK, 12-16 May 2008 (30 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:38:49 -0500
     • Re: TAPE workshop on the curation and preservation of audiovisual collections, Glasgow, UK, 12-16 May 2008 (44 lines)
       From: Art Shifrin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:52:45 -0500
     • Re: TAPE workshop on the curation and preservation of audiovisual collections, Glasgow, UK, 12-16 May 2008 (35 lines)
       From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:19:31 +0200
     • Re: TAPE workshop on the curation and preservation of audiovisual collections, Glasgow, UK, 12-16 May 2008 (49 lines)
       From: Art Shifrin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:28:39 -0500
     • Re: TAPE workshop on the curation and preservation of audiovisual collections, Glasgow, UK, 12-16 May 2008 (57 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:03:23 -0500
     • Re: TAPE workshop on the curation and preservation of audiovisual collections, Glasgow, UK, 12-16 May 2008 (79 lines)
       From: Robert J Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:08:27 -0500
     • Re: TAPE workshop on the curation and preservation of audiovisual collections, Glasgow, UK, 12-16 May 2008 (25 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:33:43 -0500
     • Re: TAPE workshop on the curation and preservation of audiovisual collections, Glasgow, UK, 12-16 May 2008 (27 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:34:06 -0500
     • Re: TAPE workshop on the curation and preservation of audiovisual collections, Glasgow, UK, 12-16 May 2008 (63 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 06:11:32 -0600
     • Re: TAPE workshop on the curation and preservation of audiovisual collections, Glasgow, UK, 12-16 May 2008 (20 lines)
       From: alessandro bellafiore <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:52:35 +0100

102. Ted Fagan
     • Ted Fagan (14 lines)
       From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:55:12 -0500
     • Re: Ted Fagan (26 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:02:57 -0800

103. The Discographical Puzzle
     • Re: The Discographical Puzzle (43 lines)
       From: Howard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:59:56 -0500
     • Re: The Discographical Puzzle (54 lines)
       From: Michael Gray <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:54:27 -0500
     • Re: The Discographical Puzzle (53 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:12:30 -0500
     • Re: The Discographical Puzzle (65 lines)
       From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:56:25 +0100
     • Re: The Discographical Puzzle (36 lines)
       From: Howard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:52:26 -0500
     • Re: The Discographical Puzzle (25 lines)
       From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:22:16 -0500
     • Re: The Discographical Puzzle (29 lines)
       From: Howard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:26:11 -0500
     • Re: The Discographical Puzzle (40 lines)
       From: Michael Gray <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:44:37 -0500
     • Re: The Discographical Puzzle (114 lines)
       From: Howard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:29:02 -0500
     • Re: The Discographical Puzzle (21 lines)
       From: Howard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:37:08 -0500
     • Re: The Discographical Puzzle (35 lines)
       From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:46:49 +0100
     • Re: The Discographical Puzzle (14 lines)
       From: Howard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:51:06 -0500
     • Re: The Discographical Puzzle (30 lines)
       From: Howard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:00:04 -0500
     • Re: The Discographical Puzzle (26 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:44:17 -0500

104. THE ROYALE GROUP
     • Re: THE ROYALE GROUP (28 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:06:20 GMT

105. TIME SENSITIVE - Senior Management Position Posting in the National Archives
     • TIME SENSITIVE - Senior Management Position Posting in the National Archives (51 lines)
       From: Richard Schneider <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:56:55 -0500

106. Time Travel with the San Francisco Jewish Music Festival - same time as ARSC Co
     • Time Travel with the San Francisco Jewish Music Festival - same time as ARSC Co (281 lines)
       From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:35:47 EST

107. Tito Gobbi on Royale : Was (Grammophone/album hole)
     • Re: Tito Gobbi on Royale : Was (Grammophone/album hole) (62 lines)
       From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:25:57 -0000
     • Re: Tito Gobbi on Royale : Was (Grammophone/album hole) (17 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:54:15 GMT
     • Re: Tito Gobbi on Royale : Was (Grammophone/album hole) (72 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:12:29 -0800

108. Trends in music sales
     • Trends in music sales (18 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:18:32 -0800
     • Re: Trends in music sales (38 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:17:31 -0500
     • Re: Trends in music sales (54 lines)
       From: Charles Harbutt <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:00:55 -0500
     • Re: Trends in music sales (75 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:37:23 -0500
     • Re: Trends in music sales (49 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:58:44 +0000

109. U-matic audio mastering
     • Re: U-matic audio mastering (111 lines)
       From: Jeff Willens <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:41:24 -0500

110. ultrasonic bath for records
     • Re: ultrasonic bath for records (72 lines)
       From: Douglas Small <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:42:54 -0500
     • Re: ultrasonic bath for records (87 lines)
       From: Art Shifrin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:24:12 -0500
     • Re: ultrasonic bath for records (33 lines)
       From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:16:38 -0600
     • Re: ultrasonic bath for records (46 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:57:15 -0500
     • Re: ultrasonic bath for records (57 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:08:37 -0500
     • Re: ultrasonic bath for records (108 lines)
       From: Ken Fritz <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:07:02 -0500
     • Re: ultrasonic bath for records (116 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:49:31 -0500
     • Re: ultrasonic bath for records (43 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:53:32 -0600
     • Re: ultrasonic bath for records (53 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 23:14:01 -0500
     • Re: ultrasonic bath for records (25 lines)
       From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 06:55:16 +0200

111. ultrasonic bathing
     • ultrasonic bathing (68 lines)
       From: Douglas Small <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 05:32:38 -0500
     • Re: ultrasonic bathing (32 lines)
       From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:30:37 -0600

112. Unsubscribe
     • Unsubscribe (18 lines)
       From: Adrian Shuman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:07:27 -0500
     • Re: Unsubscribe (14 lines)
       From: Brent <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:52:55 -0500

113. unsubscribe
     • unsubscribe (15 lines)
       From: Art Shifrin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:21:23 -0500
     • Re: unsubscribe (19 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:50:43 -0500
     • unsubscribe (14 lines)
       From: Ken Fritz <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:37:08 -0500

114. Vail Colorado-Todays information & news from Vail Daily - News
     • Vail Colorado-Todays information & news from Vail Daily - News (16 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:39:35 -0500
     • Re: Vail Colorado-Todays information & news from Vail Daily - News (29 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:01:07 -0600

115. Villa-Lobos on Everest
     • Villa-Lobos on Everest (17 lines)
       From: Francesco Martinelli <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:46:59 +0100
     • Re: Villa-Lobos on Everest (24 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:28:27 -0500
     • Re: Villa-Lobos on Everest (45 lines)
       From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:16:34 -0800
     • Re: Villa-Lobos on Everest (55 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:29:38 -0500
     • Re: Villa-Lobos on Everest (25 lines)
       From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:37:40 -0800
     • Re: Villa-Lobos on Everest (34 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:01:57 -0500
     • Re: Villa-Lobos on Everest (55 lines)
       From: Francesco Martinelli <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:57:36 +0100

116. Waldorf - 78 & LP
     • Waldorf - 78 & LP (18 lines)
       From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:07:17 -0500
     • Re: Waldorf - 78 & LP (38 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 22:39:47 -0500
     • Re: Waldorf - 78 & LP (67 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 06:55:00 -0500
     • Re: Waldorf - 78 & LP (85 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:42:06 -0500
     • Re: Waldorf - 78 & LP (30 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:01:41 -0500

117. Wavelab and dual boot Mac
     • Wavelab and dual boot Mac (22 lines)
       From: Tadey, Tony <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:46:59 -0600
     • Re: Wavelab and dual boot Mac (27 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:07:59 -0500
     • Re: Wavelab and dual boot Mac (26 lines)
       From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:55:22 +0200

118. What is this?
     • What is this? (28 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:04:55 -0500

119. WOT plus?!--was: Collection for sale
     • WOT plus?!--was: Collection for sale (62 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:45:59 -0500
     • Re: WOT plus?!--was: Collection for sale (68 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:05:18 -0800
     • Re: WOT plus?!--was: Collection for sale (84 lines)
       From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:29:02 -0500

120. [ARSCLIST ] UNSUBSCRIBE
     • [ARSCLIST ] UNSUBSCRIBE (13 lines)
       From: Ken Fritz <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 13:46:20 -0500
     • Re: [ARSCLIST ] UNSUBSCRIBE (22 lines)
       From: Nigel Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:32:36 +0700
     • Re: [ARSCLIST ] UNSUBSCRIBE (29 lines)
       From: Nigel Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:33:01 +0700
     • Re: [ARSCLIST ] UNSUBSCRIBE (33 lines)
       From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:57:55 -0000