ARSCLIST Archives – May 2007

1. 'New' solution for stickey shed
   • 'New' solution for stickey shed (26 lines)
     From: Konrad Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 21:17:49 -0400
   • Re: 'New' solution for stickey shed (27 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 22:16:16 -0400
   • Re: 'New' solution for stickey shed (30 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 21:12:31 -0500
   • Re: 'New' solution for stickey shed (45 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 07:48:40 -0400
   • Re: 'New' solution for stickey shed (99 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 13:08:20 -0400
   • Re: 'New' solution for stickey shed (109 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 13:59:12 -0400
   • Re: 'New' solution for stickey shed (248 lines)
     From: Jim Lindner <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:47:18 -0400
   • Re: 'New' solution for stickey shed (254 lines)
     From: Jim Lindner <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:02:42 -0400
   • Re: 'New' solution for stickey shed (25 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:12:18 -0400
   • Re: 'New' solution for stickey shed (258 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:08:01 -0400
   • Re: 'New' solution for stickey shed (350 lines)
     From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 20:06:29 -0400

2. 'New' solution for sticky shed
   • Re: 'New' solution for sticky shed (33 lines)
     From: Konrad Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:43:27 -0400
   • Re: 'New' solution for sticky shed (79 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:13:38 -0400
   • Re: 'New' solution for sticky shed (92 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:33:50 -0400

3. (sort of ^ ) What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections)
   • Re: (sort of ^ ) What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (55 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:40:51 -0400
   • Re: (sort of ^ ) What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (79 lines)
     From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 09:04:54 -0700
   • Re: (sort of ^ ) What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (66 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 13:34:22 -0700
   • Re: (sort of ^ ) What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (75 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 18:38:11 -0400
   • Re: (sort of ^ ) What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (96 lines)
     From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 17:43:22 -0700
   • Re: (sort of ^ ) What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (71 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 22:14:08 -0400
   • Re: (sort of ^ ) What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (30 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 22:27:59 -0400
   • Re: (sort of ^ ) What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (36 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 23:49:43 -0400
   • Re: (sort of ^ ) What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (83 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 07:02:58 -0700
   • Re: (sort of ^ ) What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (32 lines)
     From: Bigelow, Sue <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:07:35 -0700

4. **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (52 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 22:33:39 -0400
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (45 lines)
     From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 17:33:51 +0300
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (47 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 10:55:32 -0400
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (78 lines)
     From: Jerry Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 16:50:45 -0400
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (64 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 21:39:50 -0400
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (26 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 22:04:52 -0400
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (42 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 22:13:18 -0400
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (34 lines)
     From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 19:13:07 -0700
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (57 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 22:26:10 -0400
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (53 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 22:34:09 -0400
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (46 lines)
     From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 07:07:25 +0300
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (78 lines)
     From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 07:16:14 +0300
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (47 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 01:01:42 -0400
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (63 lines)
     From: Jack Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 01:55:38 -0400
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (48 lines)
     From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 09:33:32 +0300
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (60 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 01:20:22 -0400
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (67 lines)
     From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 23:53:47 +0200
   • Re: **SPAM** [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (28 lines)
     From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 00:10:48 +0200

5. A Change in CD marketing?
   • Re: A Change in CD marketing? (57 lines)
     From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 13:30:51 -0700
   • Re: A Change in CD marketing? (73 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 20:15:04 -0400
   • Re: A Change in CD marketing? (67 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:01:49 -0700

6. About Prescott Bush
   • About Prescott Bush (35 lines)
     From: Lewanne Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 11:32:31 -0400
   • Re: About Prescott Bush (50 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:47:23 -0400

7. Apples (was: Cedar)
   • Re: Apples (was: Cedar) (48 lines)
     From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 08:51:26 +0300

8. Archival positions....and scope
   • Re: Archival positions....and scope (102 lines)
     From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 17:35:23 -0700

9. ARSC Awards: 2007 Winners
   • ARSC Awards: 2007 Winners (250 lines)
     From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 21:20:12 -0400

10. ARSC Conference - So little time
    • Re: ARSC Conference - So little time (47 lines)
      From: Steven Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:10:32 EDT
    • Re: ARSC Conference - So little time (57 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 01:17:06 -0400

11. ARSC Conference Photos
    • Re: ARSC Conference Photos (87 lines)
      From: Wasserman, Robert A - WHS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 14:47:35 -0500
    • Re: ARSC Conference Photos (104 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 18:16:05 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Conference Photos (34 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 10:17:48 -0700

12. ARSC Conference report - Photos coming soon
    • Re: ARSC Conference report - Photos coming soon (38 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 08:26:53 EDT
    • Re: ARSC Conference report - Photos coming soon (57 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 09:05:43 -0700
    • Re: ARSC Conference report - Photos coming soon (88 lines)
      From: Miriam Meislik <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 11:45:58 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Conference report - Photos coming soon (47 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:25:26 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Conference report - Photos coming soon (78 lines)
      From: Kiwi O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 10:05:33 -0700
    • Re: ARSC Conference report - Photos coming soon (62 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 18:22:13 -0400

13. ARSC Conference report: Day 1
    • ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (32 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 00:38:07 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (42 lines)
      From: Farrington, Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 15:36:15 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (96 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:11:43 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (52 lines)
      From: Jack Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 21:21:34 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Conference report: Day 1 (32 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 22:31:44 +0200

14. ARSC Conference report: Day 2
    • ARSC Conference report: Day 2 (59 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 01:06:52 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Conference report: Day 2 (37 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 17:38:51 +0300
    • Re: ARSC Conference report: Day 2 (47 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 21:57:49 -0400

15. ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm
    • ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm (42 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:57:28 EDT
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm (66 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 23:30:16 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm (61 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 23:35:33 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm (80 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 22:14:24 -0700
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm (91 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 00:23:21 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm (88 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 05:39:56 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm (31 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 08:40:06 EDT
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm (40 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 08:41:37 EDT
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm (47 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 08:21:24 -0700
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm (65 lines)
      From: Laura Mundee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 09:31:28 -0500
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm (82 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:28:00 -0500
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm (53 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 12:14:44 -0700

16. ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm - CLARIFICATION!
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm - CLARIFICATION! (44 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 14:13:59 EDT
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm - CLARIFICATION! (88 lines)
      From: Kiwi O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:50:34 -0700
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm - CLARIFICATION! (57 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 15:44:43 -0400
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm - CLARIFICATION! (66 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 21:48:05 +0200
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm - CLARIFICATION! (81 lines)
      From: Kiwi O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 13:04:52 -0700
    • Re: ARSC Conference Slide Show from Steve Ramm - CLARIFICATION! (62 lines)
      From: Laura Mundee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:36:41 -0500

17. ARSC Conference: Day 3
    • ARSC Conference: Day 3 (90 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 00:17:05 EDT

18. ARSC Lifetime Achievement Awards
    • ARSC Lifetime Achievement Awards (25 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 08:31:00 EDT

19. ARSC's new officers
    • ARSC's new officers (70 lines)
      From: Sam Brylawski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 20:44:32 -0400

20. ARSClist archives for all
    • ARSClist archives for all (20 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 00:25:24 -0400

21. Asch/Stinson album 462 3-12inch 78rpm - Does anybody have a copy of listing of its contents?
    • Asch/Stinson album 462 3-12inch 78rpm - Does anybody have a copy of listing of its contents? (18 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 00:09:23 -0400
    • Re: Asch/Stinson album 462 3-12inch 78rpm - Does anybody have a copy of listing of its contents? (26 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 00:45:25 -0400

22. Assistance Please with Russian Waltz
    • Assistance Please with Russian Waltz (57 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:21:51 -0400
    • Re: Assistance Please with Russian Waltz (66 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:56:35 -0400
    • Re: Assistance Please with Russian Waltz (88 lines)
      From: Alec McLane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 17:35:01 -0400
    • Re: Assistance Please with Russian Waltz (105 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 23:04:45 +0100
    • Re: Assistance Please with Russian Waltz (106 lines)
      From: mike aylward <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 23:54:58 +0100
    • Re: Assistance Please with Russian Waltz (138 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 21:17:28 -0400
    • Re: Assistance Please with Russian Waltz (56 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 08:36:22 -0400

23. Available Classical and Spoken Word Record Catalogs
    • Available Classical and Spoken Word Record Catalogs (23 lines)
      From: Steve Weiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:29:01 -0400

24. Best Practices for Digital Collections at Univ of Maryland Libraries
    • Best Practices for Digital Collections at Univ of Maryland Libraries (33 lines)
      From: Kate Murray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 12:40:15 -0400

25. bilingual (Spanish/English) audio archivist position - Brookly NY
    • bilingual (Spanish/English) audio archivist position - Brookly NY (67 lines)
      From: Dave Nolan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:55:01 -0400

26. Birgit Nilsson records a cylinder
    • Birgit Nilsson records a cylinder (26 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 14:01:33 -0700
    • Re: Birgit Nilsson records a cylinder (32 lines)
      From: Paul Charosh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 22:10:34 EDT
    • Re: Birgit Nilsson records a cylinder (36 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:49:54 -0700
    • Re: Birgit Nilsson records a cylinder (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 21:02:36 -0700

27. Casio CW-100 CD/DVD Printer / any thoughts?
    • Casio CW-100 CD/DVD Printer / any thoughts? (21 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:21:44 -0400
    • Re: Casio CW-100 CD/DVD Printer / any thoughts? (33 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:38:51 -0400

28. Cedar
    • Cedar (47 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 14:39:11 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (58 lines)
      From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 14:57:58 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (44 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 20:06:33 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (36 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 06:43:56 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (136 lines)
      From: Dismuke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 07:07:42 -0700
    • Re: Cedar (39 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 20:56:08 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (99 lines)
      From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 21:53:10 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (63 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:04:52 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (40 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:07:38 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (33 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:29:30 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (164 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 08:59:45 -0700
    • Re: Cedar (73 lines)
      From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 18:16:14 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (57 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:06:57 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (64 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:10:57 -0500
    • Re: Cedar (26 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 22:14:14 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (56 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 22:49:14 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (56 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 00:36:23 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (41 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:06:40 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (69 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 05:42:37 -0400

29. CEDAR
    • CEDAR (38 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 08:09:10 -0500

30. Cedar
    • Re: Cedar (48 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 09:17:17 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (37 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:37:37 +0100
    • Re: Cedar (70 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 10:49:26 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (97 lines)
      From: Jonathan Wise <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:15:53 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (50 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:28:51 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (36 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:05:31 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (40 lines)
      From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 23:39:55 +0200
    • Re: Cedar (38 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:34:03 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (73 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:25:35 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (38 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 23:20:33 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (49 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:44:38 +0000
    • Re: Cedar (79 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:41:34 +0000
    • Re: Cedar (55 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:52:19 +0000
    • Re: Cedar (72 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 10:41:35 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (56 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 10:45:26 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (36 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 10:55:30 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (30 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 10:48:41 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (33 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:44:04 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (34 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:47:37 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (78 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 09:47:03 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (33 lines)
      From: Alex Hartov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 10:03:05 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (61 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:40:10 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (30 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:15:12 -0500
    • Re: Cedar (33 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:56:33 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (54 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 18:56:56 +0000
    • Re: Cedar (37 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 18:59:14 +0000
    • Re: Cedar (29 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 16:51:42 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (35 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 16:57:15 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (42 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 19:54:38 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (30 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 20:01:00 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (28 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 22:01:42 -0500
    • Re: Cedar (34 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 16:27:57 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (36 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 17:53:41 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (37 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 17:55:49 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (30 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:14:25 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (76 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:21:27 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (33 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 10:50:58 -0500
    • Re: Cedar (33 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:19:45 -0500
    • Re: Cedar (84 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 12:55:05 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (49 lines)
      From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 16:24:58 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (41 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 19:41:58 +0000
    • Re: Cedar (75 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:33:10 +0200
    • Re: Cedar (37 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:49:48 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (40 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 20:58:54 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (55 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 10:52:30 +0200
    • Re: Cedar (81 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 12:41:30 +0100
    • Re: Cedar (110 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:31:26 +0200
    • Re: Cedar (48 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 19:27:26 +0000
    • Re: Cedar (79 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 21:16:31 -0400
    • Re: Cedar (29 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:51:24 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (52 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:53:41 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (56 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 08:42:26 +0300
    • Re: Cedar (33 lines)
      From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 12:47:10 -0400

31. Cedar - acoustical recordings
    • Re: Cedar - acoustical recordings (60 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 21:09:49 +0200
    • Re: Cedar - acoustical recordings (26 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 23:28:10 -0400
    • Re: Cedar - acoustical recordings (29 lines)
      From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 22:45:52 -0500
    • Re: Cedar - acoustical recordings (37 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 20:45:37 +0000
    • Re: Cedar - acoustical recordings (55 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 13:53:15 +0200
    • Re: Cedar - acoustical recordings (60 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 20:29:53 +0000
    • Re: Cedar - acoustical recordings (61 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 16:15:31 -0500
    • Re: Cedar - acoustical recordings (76 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:52:07 +0200
    • Re: Cedar - acoustical recordings (96 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 17:47:37 -0500
    • Re: Cedar - acoustical recordings (110 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 06:17:19 +0200
    • Re: Cedar - acoustical recordings (125 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:12:13 +0100
    • Re: Cedar - acoustical recordings (147 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:35:28 -0500

32. CFP -- "Farther Along": A Conference on the Southern Gospel Convention-Singing Tradition
    • CFP -- "Farther Along": A Conference on the Southern Gospel Convention-Singing Tradition (109 lines)
      From: Paul F. Wells <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 13:17:57 -0500

33. Commercial - new auction list now available
    • Commercial - new auction list now available (63 lines)
      From: Hawthorn's Antique Audio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:32:21 -0700

34. Concert Hall Society
    • Concert Hall Society (20 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 17:42:43 -0400
    • Re: Concert Hall Society (31 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:47:26 -0700

35. config for DIN 45327 5-pin jack
    • config for DIN 45327 5-pin jack (32 lines)
      From: Huelsbergen, Anselm M <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:20:43 -0500
    • Re: config for DIN 45327 5-pin jack (42 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 13:59:29 -0700

36. Copyright
    • Copyright (16 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 10:42:43 -0700

37. Copyright explained in a unique manner
    • Copyright explained in a unique manner (17 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:09:01 -0400

38. crossing borders, importing records (was something else)
    • Re: crossing borders, importing records (was something else) (53 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 22:38:21 -0400

39. DATs -- fully submerged?
    • DATs -- fully submerged? (21 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 05:58:36 -0400
    • Re: DATs -- fully submerged? (32 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 09:21:57 -0500
    • Re: DATs -- fully submerged? (35 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 21:35:19 -0400

40. Discographical files
    • Discographical files (51 lines)
      From: Steve Weiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 16:44:36 -0400
    • Re: Discographical files (69 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:02:40 -0400
    • Re: Discographical files (40 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 21:22:07 -0400
    • Re: Discographical files (39 lines)
      From: Matthew Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 09:34:55 -0400
    • Re: Discographical files (49 lines)
      From: Steve Weiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 09:55:02 -0400
    • Re: Discographical files (49 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 22:22:02 -0400
    • Re: Discographical files (31 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 12:48:52 +0300
    • Re: Discographical files (48 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 22:26:00 -0400
    • Re: Discographical files (44 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:25:19 +0300
    • Re: Discographical files (61 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 21:35:41 -0400

41. DVD video to iPod
    • Re: DVD video to iPod (40 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:12:54 -0500

42. Ethics. was Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues.
    • Re: Ethics. was Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (95 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:47:48 -0400
    • Re: Ethics. was Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (48 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 09:04:59 -0700
    • Re: Ethics. was Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (29 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 09:45:22 -0700
    • Re: Ethics. was Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (58 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 22:24:06 -0400
    • Re: Ethics. was Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (72 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 22:44:23 -0400
    • Re: Ethics. was Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (39 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 23:03:57 -0700
    • Re: Ethics. was Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (28 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 10:22:47 -0500

43. Folkways Leadbelly Memorial/Legacy One cover variants
    • Folkways Leadbelly Memorial/Legacy One cover variants (53 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 20:39:23 -0400

44. Folkways Leadbelly-Take This Hammer Memorial Album
    • Folkways Leadbelly-Take This Hammer Memorial Album (21 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 23:31:03 -0400

45. forwarded from the Stan Kenton list
    • forwarded from the Stan Kenton list (40 lines)
      From: Morris Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 15:25:52 -0500

46. FREE for pickup -- Epson high-end photo printer, needs service
    • FREE for pickup -- Epson high-end photo printer, needs service (25 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:51:42 -0400

47. FW: Curb Center Event Celebrates Nashville's Early Record Labels
    • FW: Curb Center Event Celebrates Nashville's Early Record Labels (199 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:46:43 -0400

48. Fw: [78-l] Read it and Weap
    • Fw: [78-l] Read it and Weap (149 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 10:14:46 +0100
    • Re: Fw: [78-l] Read it and Weap (53 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:17:23 -0400

49. Fwd: BULK: [Kentonia] Another Era Ends
    • Fwd: BULK: [Kentonia] Another Era Ends (49 lines)
      From: Morris Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 15:22:10 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: BULK: [Kentonia] Another Era Ends (74 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 16:42:22 -0400

50. Fwd: John Eargle...
    • Fwd: John Eargle... (54 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 09:29:30 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: John Eargle... (63 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 09:09:25 -0700
    • Re: Fwd: John Eargle... (79 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 19:03:21 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: John Eargle... (96 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 22:55:48 -0600

51. George Jellinek-From Hungarian Refugee to Opera Lover Extraordinaire - New York Times
    • George Jellinek-From Hungarian Refugee to Opera Lover Extraordinaire - New York Times (19 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 17:10:35 -0400

52. Gonzales proposes new crime: 'Attempted' copyright infringement
    • Gonzales proposes new crime: 'Attempted' copyright infringement (123 lines)
      From: Matt Love <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:06:02 -0700

53. Gowers considered recommending shorter copyright term
    • Re: Gowers considered recommending shorter copyright term (45 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 11:08:06 +0300
    • Re: Gowers considered recommending shorter copyright term (42 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 21:43:03 -0400
    • Re: Gowers considered recommending shorter copyright term (46 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 07:17:25 +0300
    • Re: Gowers considered recommending shorter copyright term (42 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 01:10:10 -0400
    • Re: Gowers considered recommending shorter copyright term (48 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 08:29:19 +0300

54. Home Cinema (was DVD Video to iPod)
    • Re: Home Cinema (was DVD Video to iPod) (55 lines)
      From: Matthew Barton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 07:25:03 -0400

55. Irish EMail addresses
    • Irish EMail addresses (31 lines)
      From: Dr. Rainer E. Lotz c/o Birgit Lotz Verlag <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 10:35:47 +0200

56. Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ?
    • Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (25 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 17:18:13 -0400
    • Re: Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (27 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 17:53:22 -0400
    • Re: Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (29 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 17:58:02 -0400
    • Re: Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (31 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:46:02 -0700
    • Re: Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (50 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 00:56:08 +0200
    • Re: Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (52 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 18:56:11 -0400
    • Re: Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (25 lines)
      From: Adrian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 23:01:01 GMT
    • Re: Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (63 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 19:08:09 -0400
    • Re: Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (45 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 19:20:50 -0400
    • Re: Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (30 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 19:30:39 -0400
    • Re: Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (32 lines)
      From: Adrian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 05:45:41 GMT
    • Re: Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (35 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 06:17:05 -0400
    • Re: Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (58 lines)
      From: Rollin' Recording <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 09:09:28 -0500
    • Re: Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (23 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 22:21:19 -0400
    • Re: Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (51 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 11:03:07 -0400
    • Re: Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (49 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 11:06:17 -0400
    • Re: Is this audio? or word processing? or ? ? ? (55 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 13:10:43 -0400

57. Job, Chicago: Manager, Creative Audio Archive (CAA)
    • Job, Chicago: Manager, Creative Audio Archive (CAA) (95 lines)
      From: Farris Wahbeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:14:56 -0500

58. Jobs Out There
    • Jobs Out There (20 lines)
      From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 13:52:43 -0700
    • Re: Jobs Out There (35 lines)
      From: Nigel Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 09:00:46 +0400
    • Re: Jobs Out There (62 lines)
      From: Nigel Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 10:33:52 +0400

59. King Oliver
    • King Oliver (24 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 13:41:45 -0400

60. Label discographies- was Understanding Record Numbers
    • Re: Label discographies- was Understanding Record Numbers (35 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:31:27 +0300

61. Lennick's "EFREM"...?--was Mass Digitization
    • Lennick's "EFREM"...?--was Mass Digitization (45 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 22:48:29 -0400
    • Re: Lennick's "EFREM"...?--was Mass Digitization (57 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 23:10:45 -0400
    • Re: Lennick's "EFREM"...?--was Mass Digitization (61 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 20:12:24 -0700
    • Re: Lennick's "EFREM"...?--was Mass Digitization (30 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 06:43:00 -0700
    • Re: Lennick's "EFREM"...?--was Mass Digitization (37 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:02:06 -0400
    • Re: Lennick's "EFREM"...?--was Mass Digitization (29 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 06:37:28 -0700
    • Re: Lennick's "EFREM"...?--was Mass Digitization (86 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 23:32:25 -0400
    • Re: Lennick's "EFREM"...?--was Mass Digitization (98 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 00:55:28 -0400
    • Re: Lennick's "EFREM"...?--was Mass Digitization (48 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 02:20:33 -0400

62. Liberate your quad reels
    • Liberate your quad reels (32 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 07:59:16 -0400

63. Library of Congress vacancy - NAVCC Robotics/Tape Transfer Operator
    • Library of Congress vacancy - NAVCC Robotics/Tape Transfer Operator (46 lines)
      From: Gregory Lukow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 21:21:12 -0400

64. looking for 1/2" eiaj videorecorder
    • looking for 1/2" eiaj videorecorder (25 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 08:51:54 -0400

65. Looking for Goran Finnberg
    • Looking for Goran Finnberg (26 lines)
      From: Sam Damask <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 10:04:25 -0500

66. Manhattan street-noise recordings, 1906 to 1908 - any l eads?
    • Re: Manhattan street-noise recordings, 1906 to 1908 - any l eads? (27 lines)
      From: Adrian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 18:57:24 GMT

67. Manhattan street-noise recordings, 1906 to 1908 - any leads?
    • Manhattan street-noise recordings, 1906 to 1908 - any leads? (52 lines)
      From: James R. Chiles <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:39:27 +0000
    • Re: Manhattan street-noise recordings, 1906 to 1908 - any leads? (35 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 23:17:20 -0400

68. Mass Digitization
    • Re: Mass Digitization (257 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:08:44 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (291 lines)
      From: Jim Lindner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:52:45 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (345 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 19:32:04 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (37 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:52:00 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization (124 lines)
      From: Schooley, John <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:59:00 -0500
    • Re: Mass Digitization (150 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 17:35:32 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (308 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 14:46:18 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization (71 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:47:56 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (234 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:10:50 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (458 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:59:58 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization (276 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 20:29:16 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (294 lines)
      From: Paul Tombleson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 20:44:50 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (294 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 21:05:05 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (37 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 22:49:02 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (31 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 23:52:39 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (37 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 00:08:36 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (23 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 05:50:43 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization (37 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 10:04:35 -0500
    • Re: Mass Digitization (100 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 08:21:25 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization (19 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 08:27:48 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization (61 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:40:41 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (44 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:27:30 +0000
    • Re: Mass Digitization (31 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:29:29 +0000
    • Re: Mass Digitization (450 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:59:02 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization (325 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 15:29:45 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (31 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:45:29 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization (342 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 15:53:46 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (468 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 16:23:09 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (712 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:14:06 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization (395 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:53:23 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (487 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:01:33 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (401 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:07:52 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (515 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:09:37 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (338 lines)
      From: Michael Olson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 15:31:56 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization (464 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:05:31 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (522 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:07:38 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (189 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 01:36:42 +0200
    • Re: Mass Digitization (68 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 20:18:11 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (40 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 21:12:46 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (45 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:31:43 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (36 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:04:24 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (60 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:30:57 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (49 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:39:57 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (21 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 01:09:52 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (67 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 07:35:52 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization (53 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:05:09 +0000
    • Re: Mass Digitization (42 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:07:53 +0000
    • Re: Mass Digitization (290 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:59:23 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization (186 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 23:09:06 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (30 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 06:45:05 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization (89 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 22:07:52 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization (33 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 06:59:23 -0700

69. Mass Digitization / Easing yourself into the thought...
    • Re: Mass Digitization / Easing yourself into the thought... (103 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 12:43:49 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization / Easing yourself into the thought... (73 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:12:56 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization / Easing yourself into the thought... (102 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 19:01:34 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization / Easing yourself into the thought... (107 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 00:50:31 -0400

70. Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next??
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next?? (581 lines)
      From: Jim Lindner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:32:07 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next?? (626 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:24:10 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next?? (1099 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:54:57 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next?? (817 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 21:21:43 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next?? (844 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 21:58:22 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next?? (32 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 08:13:46 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next?? (916 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:00:27 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next?? (952 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:12:51 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next?? (1142 lines)
      From: Jim Lindner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:44:07 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next?? (1173 lines)
      From: Jim Lindner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:44:39 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next?? (1224 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 12:57:51 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next?? (47 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 15:59:47 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next?? (36 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:04:56 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next?? (54 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:30:49 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next?? (1026 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 15:22:08 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next?? (75 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 00:03:10 -0400

71. Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next??]
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next??] (44 lines)
      From: Bertram Lyons <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 09:58:06 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization / the gear DOES exist, what next??] (163 lines)
      From: Jim Lindner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:04:54 -0400

72. Mass Digitization / what next??/ Standards
    • Re: Mass Digitization / what next??/ Standards (1353 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:11:06 -0700

73. Mass Digitization was... 'New' solution for stickey shed
    • Re: Mass Digitization was... 'New' solution for stickey shed (368 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:23:12 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization was... 'New' solution for stickey shed (269 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 19:52:47 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization was... 'New' solution for stickey shed (43 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 06:55:18 +0300
    • Re: Mass Digitization was... 'New' solution for stickey shed (86 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 00:13:27 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization was... 'New' solution for stickey shed (92 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 01:31:38 -0400

74. Mass Digitization/ 78's
    • Re: Mass Digitization/ 78's (239 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:07:05 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization/ 78's (52 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:18:26 -0700
    • Re: Mass Digitization/ 78's (64 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 21:27:43 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization/ 78's (220 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 21:23:47 -0400
    • Re: Mass Digitization/ 78's (159 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 11:38:43 +0200
    • Re: Mass Digitization/ 78's (39 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 21:47:13 -0400

75. May Issue of Black Grooves
    • May Issue of Black Grooves (65 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 15:47:23 -0400

76. Microfilm
    • Microfilm (26 lines)
      From: Adam Girard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 01:16:17 +0000

77. Moving Sound Recording Collections
    • Moving Sound Recording Collections (33 lines)
      From: Tara Kennedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 10:54:59 -0400
    • Re: Moving Sound Recording Collections (54 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:36:16 -0400
    • Re: Moving Sound Recording Collections (49 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 21:47:34 -0400

78. Mp3 ripper that does CD Text
    • Mp3 ripper that does CD Text (24 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 19:21:54 -0400
    • Re: Mp3 ripper that does CD Text (48 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 20:57:08 -0500
    • Re: Mp3 ripper that does CD Text (25 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 21:18:36 -0500
    • Re: Mp3 ripper that does CD Text (22 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 07:44:32 -0500
    • Re: Mp3 ripper that does CD Text (21 lines)
      From: Jos Van Dyck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 09:04:43 -0400
    • Re: Mp3 ripper that does CD Text (33 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:30:05 -0400
    • Re: Mp3 ripper that does CD Text (57 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 15:07:03 -0700
    • Re: Mp3 ripper that does CD Text (84 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:26:30 -0400
    • Re: Mp3 ripper that does CD Text (107 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:39:06 -0500

79. Mystery singers
    • Mystery singers (43 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 09:34:37 -0400
    • Re: Mystery singers (67 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 15:09:35 +0100
    • Re: Mystery singers (26 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 09:52:37 -0700

80. Non-real time minidisc ripping
    • Non-real time minidisc ripping (38 lines)
      From: Jim Sam <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 10:18:56 -0700
    • Re: Non-real time minidisc ripping (70 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:57:38 -0400
    • Re: Non-real time minidisc ripping (63 lines)
      From: Jim Sam <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:49:42 -0700
    • Re: Non-real time minidisc ripping (51 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 21:55:08 +0200
    • Re: Non-real time minidisc ripping (32 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 16:59:21 -0400

81. NZ jobs - Archivist - Audio Preservation & Archivist (Cataloguer/Researcher)
    • NZ jobs - Archivist - Audio Preservation & Archivist (Cataloguer/Researcher) (76 lines)
      From: John Kelcher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:48:41 +1200

82. Once again, user-hostile DRM scheme gets foiled
    • Once again, user-hostile DRM scheme gets foiled (24 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 06:48:48 -0400

83. OS X/Apple (was CEDAR)
    • Re: OS X/Apple (was CEDAR) (34 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 17:58:10 +0300
    • Re: OS X/Apple (was CEDAR) (37 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 20:09:39 +0000
    • Re: OS X/Apple (was CEDAR) (46 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 22:33:03 -0400
    • Re: OS X/Apple (was CEDAR) (34 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 08:44:10 +0300

84. Owner's Manual: Roland SN-550 Digital Noise Eliminator
    • Re: Owner's Manual: Roland SN-550 Digital Noise Eliminator (59 lines)
      From: D Basson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:28:41 +0200

85. Paul Robeson Concert Hall ep - what is the source?
    • Paul Robeson Concert Hall ep - what is the source? (28 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 22:14:51 -0400
    • Re: Paul Robeson Concert Hall ep - what is the source? (52 lines)
      From: ARTHANOR PRODUCTIONS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 05:47:23 +0200

86. Photo Hosting sites
    • Photo Hosting sites (31 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 20:09:12 EDT
    • Re: Photo Hosting sites (58 lines)
      From: Kiwi O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 18:21:32 -0700

87. Photo Hosting sites - Shutterfly
    • Photo Hosting sites - Shutterfly (35 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 20:12:50 EDT

88. Posting opinion in a public forum
    • Re: Posting opinion in a public forum (104 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:39:43 -0700
    • Re: Posting opinion in a public forum (97 lines)
      From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:23:35 -0700

89. Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues.
    • Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (85 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 10:17:38 -0400
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (106 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:02:31 -0700
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (70 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 20:57:03 -0400
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (159 lines)
      From: Dismuke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 04:05:31 -0700
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (34 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 07:30:05 -0700
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (38 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:46:27 -0500
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (24 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 18:22:05 -0700
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (75 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 17:39:12 +0000
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (41 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 10:20:05 -0500
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (64 lines)
      From: Mal Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 06:48:14 -1000
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (37 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 13:18:10 -0500
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (64 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 00:03:28 -0400
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (130 lines)
      From: Dismuke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 22:22:33 -0700
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (57 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 07:46:26 -0400
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (149 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 07:50:54 -0400
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (57 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 10:05:21 -0500
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (49 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:12:03 -0700
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (47 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 22:23:43 -0400
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (60 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:07:51 -0700
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (29 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:16:11 -0700
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (65 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:02:43 +0300
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (70 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 05:41:47 -0700
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (36 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 21:45:44 -0400
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (40 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 15:59:32 +0300
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (45 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 16:04:18 +0300
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (56 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 20:43:06 -0400
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (42 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:05:52 +0300
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (42 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 22:12:39 -0400
    • Re: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (44 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 10:48:17 +0300

90. Reissue CD(-R)'s--was: Gowers considered recommending shorter copyright term
    • Reissue CD(-R)'s--was: Gowers considered recommending shorter copyright term (55 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 20:44:50 -0400
    • Re: Reissue CD(-R)'s--was: Gowers considered recommending shorter copyright term (51 lines)
      From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 09:05:08 +0300

91. RIP: EMI
    • RIP: EMI (21 lines)
      From: Matthew Barton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 15:38:20 -0400
    • Re: RIP: EMI (40 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 16:46:25 -0400
    • Re: RIP: EMI (78 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:59:02 -0400
    • Re: RIP: EMI (37 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:22:28 -0400
    • Re: RIP: EMI (19 lines)
      From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:44:40 -0500
    • Re: RIP: EMI (50 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 19:22:08 -0400
    • Re: RIP: EMI (26 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:48:15 -0500
    • Re: RIP: EMI (27 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:07:23 EDT
    • Re: RIP: EMI (42 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:09:10 EDT
    • Re: RIP: EMI (51 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:34:28 -0400
    • Re: RIP: EMI (42 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 01:03:04 -0400
    • Re: RIP: EMI (61 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:04:11 -0700
    • Re: RIP: EMI (38 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:08:00 -0700
    • Re: RIP: EMI (38 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:09:52 -0700
    • Re: RIP: EMI (45 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 23:35:46 -0400

92. RIP: EMI / let's clear the air
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (128 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 12:16:28 -0700
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (31 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 12:50:15 -0700
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (95 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:39:27 -0700
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (32 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:00:23 -0700
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (116 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:05:10 -0400
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (17 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:10:57 -0500
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (129 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:04:40 -0400
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (41 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:05:29 -0700
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (42 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:48:28 -0400
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (138 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:52:15 -0400
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (154 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 20:36:34 -0400
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (55 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:40:50 -0700
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (85 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 20:58:47 -0400
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (165 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 18:17:03 -0700
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (95 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 18:29:18 -0700
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (70 lines)
      From: Mal Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:04:38 -1000
    • Re: RIP: EMI / let's clear the air (55 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 22:18:09 -0500

93. Russian CD 78 reissues
    • Russian CD 78 reissues (18 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 16:03:27 -0400

94. SACD fans -- some discounts
    • SACD fans -- some discounts (25 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 18:10:17 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (42 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 19:45:50 -0500
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (76 lines)
      From: Graeme Jaye <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 09:11:00 +0200
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (35 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 02:42:24 -0500
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (28 lines)
      From: Graeme Jaye <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 13:37:09 +0200
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (36 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 09:25:38 -0500
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (36 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 09:48:49 +0000
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (112 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 09:54:23 +0000
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (115 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 13:08:14 -0700
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (36 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 16:09:12 -0500
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (52 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 14:36:43 -0700
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (51 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 19:20:00 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (77 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 00:48:43 +0100
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (54 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 21:29:11 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (42 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 22:10:02 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (88 lines)
      From: Miss Q <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 22:36:32 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (92 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 22:49:06 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (29 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 22:47:58 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (100 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 21:52:02 -0500
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (51 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 22:57:09 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (107 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 23:01:53 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (32 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 23:13:01 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (29 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 22:32:07 -0500
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (45 lines)
      From: Paul Tyler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 22:31:27 -0700
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (52 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 23:22:38 +0000
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (38 lines)
      From: Graeme Jaye <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 11:53:15 +0200
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (60 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 07:58:49 -0500
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (37 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 14:55:22 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (29 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 21:44:35 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (25 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 23:34:09 -0500
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (45 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 06:50:54 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (42 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:23:58 +0000
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (36 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 18:25:20 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (48 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 18:52:15 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (76 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 19:25:56 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (67 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 19:39:53 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (85 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 20:48:51 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (110 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 21:21:15 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (56 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 22:58:04 -0500
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (38 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 09:34:01 -0700
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (102 lines)
      From: Kiwi O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 10:48:30 -0700
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (18 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 11:59:45 -0700
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts (47 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 23:07:09 +0000

95. SACD fans -- some discounts.... A hypothesy
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts.... A hypothesy (118 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 14:35:05 -0700
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts.... A hypothesy (105 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 17:42:02 -0400
    • Re: SACD fans -- some discounts.... A hypothesy (118 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 19:28:02 -0400

96. Saving Our Digital Heritage
    • Saving Our Digital Heritage (46 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:48:17 -0400
    • Re: Saving Our Digital Heritage (42 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:43:22 -0700

97. Some CD's, cheap
    • Some CD's, cheap (30 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 22:22:11 -0400

98. Speaking of old records...
    • Speaking of old records... (22 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 23:13:32 -0400
    • Re: Speaking of old records... (33 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:57:39 -0700

99. Steve Ramm's ARSC Conference Photos - HOPEFULLY this works
    • Steve Ramm's ARSC Conference Photos - HOPEFULLY this works (17 lines)
      From: Steven Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 14:26:41 -0400

100. Steve's ARSC Conference Photos - HOPEFULLY this works
     • Steve's ARSC Conference Photos - HOPEFULLY this works (17 lines)
       From: Steven Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 14:24:32 -0400
     • Re: Steve's ARSC Conference Photos - HOPEFULLY this works (34 lines)
       From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 15:01:52 -0700
     • Re: Steve's ARSC Conference Photos - HOPEFULLY this works (30 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:44:09 -0700
     • Re: Steve's ARSC Conference Photos - HOPEFULLY this works (19 lines)
       From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 22:22:33 -0400
     • Re: Steve's ARSC Conference Photos - HOPEFULLY this works (26 lines)
       From: Steven Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 22:46:04 EDT
     • Re: Steve's ARSC Conference Photos - HOPEFULLY this works (47 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 11:23:12 -0500
     • Re: Steve's ARSC Conference Photos - HOPEFULLY this works (45 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 17:23:14 -0700
     • Re: Steve's ARSC Conference Photos - HOPEFULLY this works (30 lines)
       From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 08:54:39 EDT

101. Storage question
     • Storage question (24 lines)
       From: Language Archives <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:27:50 -0500

102. Studio Acoustics (was Cedar)
     • Re: Studio Acoustics (was Cedar) (90 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 08:23:26 -0400
     • Re: Studio Acoustics (was Cedar) (52 lines)
       From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 09:28:01 -0400
     • Re: Studio Acoustics (was Cedar) (49 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 08:42:34 -0500
     • Re: Studio Acoustics (was Cedar) (92 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 14:09:36 +0000

103. Suggestions for small and tough and hopefully not too costly DV camera
     • Suggestions for small and tough and hopefully not too costly DV camera (51 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:06:09 -0400
     • Re: Suggestions for small and tough and hopefully not too costly DV camera (61 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:46:39 -0700
     • Re: Suggestions for small and tough and hopefully not too costly DV camera (100 lines)
       From: Miriam Meislik <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:27:06 -0400
     • Re: Suggestions for small and tough and hopefully not too costly DV camera (131 lines)
       From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:43:17 -0500
     • Re: Suggestions for small and tough and hopefully not too costly DV camera (118 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:53:42 -0400
     • Re: Suggestions for small and tough and hopefully not too costly DV camera (147 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:03:37 -0400
     • Re: Suggestions for small and tough and hopefully not too costly DV camera (100 lines)
       From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:18:41 -0500
     • Re: Suggestions for small and tough and hopefully not too costly DV camera (142 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 22:32:30 +0000
     • Re: Suggestions for small and tough and hopefully not too costly DV camera (180 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 08:34:12 -0400
     • Re: Suggestions for small and tough and hopefully not too costly DV camera (111 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:53:25 -0700
     • Re: Suggestions for small and tough and hopefully not too costly DV camera (139 lines)
       From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 19:17:14 -0500

104. Tape Baking...?
     • Tape Baking...? (34 lines)
       From: ARTHANOR PRODUCTIONS <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 20:16:36 +0200

105. The Future of Archives, Libraries .....was Mass Digitization
     • Re: The Future of Archives, Libraries .....was Mass Digitization (402 lines)
       From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:12:40 -0700
     • Re: The Future of Archives, Libraries .....was Mass Digitization (22 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 00:18:00 -0400

106. The Story with Dick Gordon
     • The Story with Dick Gordon (42 lines)
       From: Tim Brooks <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 10:34:01 EDT
     • Re: The Story with Dick Gordon (31 lines)
       From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 17:37:18 EDT
     • Re: The Story with Dick Gordon (46 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 19:44:48 -0400

107. tinyurl to Steve's slideshow
     • tinyurl to Steve's slideshow (21 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 07:37:35 -0400

108. Ultimate 78 digitalia--was: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues.
     • Ultimate 78 digitalia--was: Record Business vs. Music Business: The Shakeout Continues. (74 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 21:11:57 -0400

109. Understanding Record Numbers
     • Re: Understanding Record Numbers (50 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 00:46:46 -0400
     • Re: Understanding Record Numbers (25 lines)
       From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:31:48 +0300

110. Unlocking Audio conference London 26-27 October 2007: First circular
     • Unlocking Audio conference London 26-27 October 2007: First circular (89 lines)
       From: RICHARD RANFT <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 12:51:03 +0100

111. Victorian Palace photos
     • Victorian Palace photos (22 lines)
       From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 07:51:06 -0400

112. Wanted-very early Folkways catalogs/listings (copies)
     • Wanted-very early Folkways catalogs/listings (copies) (25 lines)
       From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 18:58:06 -0400

113. was Mass Digitization-now why preserve
     • was Mass Digitization-now why preserve (24 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 06:15:44 -0700
     • Re: was Mass Digitization-now why preserve (59 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 18:53:34 +0000
     • Re: was Mass Digitization-now why preserve (69 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 21:09:41 -0400
     • Re: was Mass Digitization-now why preserve (33 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 22:20:10 -0400
     • Re: was Mass Digitization-now why preserve (89 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 20:04:48 +0000
     • Re: was Mass Digitization-now why preserve (37 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 22:17:34 -0400
     • Re: was Mass Digitization-now why preserve (56 lines)
       From: Jack Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 01:12:33 -0400
     • Re: was Mass Digitization-now why preserve (60 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 19:34:35 +0000
     • Re: was Mass Digitization-now why preserve (33 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 20:25:02 -0400
     • Re: was Mass Digitization-now why preserve (30 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 23:21:23 -0400
     • Re: was Mass Digitization-now why preserve (18 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 07:11:53 -0700
     • Re: was Mass Digitization-now why preserve (29 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 22:27:23 -0400
     • Re: was Mass Digitization-now why preserve (20 lines)
       From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 05:24:42 +0100

114. was Mass Digitization-now why preserve ^
     • Re: was Mass Digitization-now why preserve ^ (35 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 22:44:12 -0400

115. What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections)
     • Re: What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (35 lines)
       From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:23:06 +0300
     • Re: What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (35 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:43:04 -0400
     • Re: What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (72 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 21:26:55 -0400
     • Re: What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (81 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:29:32 -0400
     • Re: What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (48 lines)
       From: Jack Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 01:14:18 -0400
     • Re: What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (41 lines)
       From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:50:45 +0300
     • Re: What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (28 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 21:03:22 -0400
     • Re: What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (39 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 21:16:50 EDT
     • Re: What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (44 lines)
       From: D P Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 08:53:35 +0300

116. What to Keep and Why....was now why preserve
     • Re: What to Keep and Why....was now why preserve (162 lines)
       From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:17:46 -0700
     • Re: What to Keep and Why....was now why preserve (32 lines)
       From: Matthew Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 09:12:15 -0400
     • Re: What to Keep and Why....was now why preserve (60 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 09:41:25 -0400
     • Re: What to Keep and Why....was now why preserve (280 lines)
       From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 17:53:48 +0200
     • Re: What to Keep and Why....was now why preserve (35 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 21:58:49 -0400
     • Re: What to Keep and Why....was now why preserve (52 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:11:37 -0700

117. Why preserve
     • Why preserve (22 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 05:47:05 -0700
     • Re: Why preserve (42 lines)
       From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:37:21 -0400
     • Re: Why preserve (87 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 20:43:48 -0400
     • Re: Why preserve (79 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 21:52:51 -0400

118. Why preserve (II)
     • Re: Why preserve (II) (49 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 21:08:48 -0400

119. William Kapell Rachmaninoff Paganini Rhapsody
     • William Kapell Rachmaninoff Paganini Rhapsody (18 lines)
       From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 20:22:31 -0400
     • Re: William Kapell Rachmaninoff Paganini Rhapsody (34 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 09:04:31 -0500

120. Wings Over America
     • Wings Over America (40 lines)
       From: Lewanne Jones <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 12:12:54 -0400

121. [78-l] ARSC Conference report - a few thoughts.
     • Re: [78-l] ARSC Conference report - a few thoughts. (51 lines)
       From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 11:29:15 -0400
     • Re: [78-l] ARSC Conference report - a few thoughts. (45 lines)
       From: Jack Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 01:37:19 -0400

122. [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 2
     • Re: [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 2 (27 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 01:17:08 -0400
     • Re: [78-l] ARSC Conference report: Day 2 (38 lines)
       From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 07:41:37 -0400

123. [78-l] Speaking of old records...
     • Re: [78-l] Speaking of old records... (39 lines)
       From: Jack Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 23:45:50 -0400

124. ^ What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections)
     • Re: ^ What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (38 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 21:29:44 -0400
     • Re: ^ What is a Milk Box ? (was Moving Sound Recording Collections) (49 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:13:31 -0400