ARSCLIST Archives – February 2007

1. "20 something classical vinyl collectors" [was Re: [ARSCLIST] Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed]
   • "20 something classical vinyl collectors" [was Re: [ARSCLIST] Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed] (29 lines)
     From: D. Blake Werts <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:47:15 -0500
   • Re: "20 something classical vinyl collectors" [was Re: [ARSCLIST] Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed] (47 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 19:48:06 -0800
   • Re: "20 something classical vinyl collectors" [was Re: [ARSCLIST] Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed] (71 lines)
     From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 22:11:55 -0600
   • Re: "20 something classical vinyl collectors" [was Re: [ARSCLIST] Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed] (76 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 23:24:36 -0500
   • Re: "20 something classical vinyl collectors" [was Re: [ARSCLIST] Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed] (36 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 23:47:35 -0500
   • Re: "20 something classical vinyl collectors" [was Re: [ARSCLIST] Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed] (25 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 01:26:55 -0500
   • Re: "20 something classical vinyl collectors" [was Re: [ARSCLIST] Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed] (74 lines)
     From: D. Blake Werts <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 09:14:15 -0500
   • Re: "20 something classical vinyl collectors" [was Re: [ARSCLIST] Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed] (38 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 18:05:44 +0000
   • Re: "20 something classical vinyl collectors" [was Re: [ARSCLIST] Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed] (26 lines)
     From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 02:17:39 -0600
   • Re: "20 something classical vinyl collectors" [was Re: [ARSCLIST] Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed] (35 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 11:27:33 +0000

2. "record" sales in the 21st century--was: interesting!
   • "record" sales in the 21st century--was: interesting! (46 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:59:11 -0500
   • Re: "record" sales in the 21st century--was: interesting! (64 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:32:20 -0500
   • Re: "record" sales in the 21st century--was: interesting! (93 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 21:33:01 -0500
   • Re: "record" sales in the 21st century--was: interesting! (50 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:44:46 -0800
   • Re: "record" sales in the 21st century--was: interesting! (134 lines)
     From: Miss Q <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 00:07:10 -0500
   • Re: "record" sales in the 21st century--was: interesting! (52 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 01:25:10 -0500
   • Re: "record" sales in the 21st century--was: interesting! (150 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:16:47 -0800
   • Re: "record" sales in the 21st century--was: interesting! (152 lines)
     From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 10:02:56 -0500

3. "Sephardic Music on Record", NYC Lecture, February 16
   • "Sephardic Music on Record", NYC Lecture, February 16 (99 lines)
     From: Joel Bresler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:49:54 -0500
   • Re: "Sephardic Music on Record", NYC Lecture, February 16 (16 lines)
     From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:18:56 -0500
   • Re: "Sephardic Music on Record", NYC Lecture, February 16 (36 lines)
     From: Joel Bresler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:39:27 -0500

4. Ad-Lib
   • Ad-Lib (24 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:12:33 -0500

5. AM radio--was: STADIUM SYMPHONY
   • AM radio--was: STADIUM SYMPHONY (39 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 00:33:31 -0500

6. Another complaint about Universal and reissue CDs
   • Another complaint about Universal and reissue CDs (38 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:32:35 -0800
   • Another complaint about Universal and reissue CDs (38 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:32:50 -0800
   • Another complaint about Universal and reissue CDs (35 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:35:14 -0800

7. Archeophone Records new release - The Great War
   • Archeophone Records new release - The Great War (14 lines)
     From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:10:15 -0500

8. ARSC Annual Conference 2007
   • ARSC Annual Conference 2007 (180 lines)
     From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:46:35 -0500

9. ARSC Members win Grammy for "Lost Sounds" and on EDison's 160th Birthday!
   • ARSC Members win Grammy for "Lost Sounds" and on EDison's 160th Birthday! (56 lines)
     From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:35:08 EST
   • Re: ARSC Members win Grammy for "Lost Sounds" and on EDison's 160th Birthday! (63 lines)
     From: Brenda Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:44:07 -0500
   • Re: ARSC Members win Grammy for "Lost Sounds" and on EDison's 160th Birthday! (93 lines)
     From: Ryan Jurison <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:14:54 +0000

10. ARSC Memberships 2007
    • ARSC Memberships 2007 (58 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 20:13:23 -0500

11. arsc newsletter deadline
    • arsc newsletter deadline (21 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:48:03 -0800
    • Re: arsc newsletter deadline (50 lines)
      From: Martin Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:28:51 -0600

12. ARSC Pre-Conference Workshop 2007
    • ARSC Pre-Conference Workshop 2007 (98 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:00:03 -0500

13. audio restoration
    • Re: audio restoration (44 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:51:46 -0500

14. Australian Rock Legend Billy Thorpe Dies
    • Australian Rock Legend Billy Thorpe Dies (69 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:57:16 -0800

15. Bernstein info needed
    • Re: Bernstein info needed (78 lines)
      From: Stan Punzel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:47:21 -0800
    • Re: Bernstein info needed (77 lines)
      From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 15:10:54 -0500
    • Re: Bernstein info needed (24 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 15:18:23 -0500

16. California Preservation Survey of Moving Image and Recorded Sound Collections
    • California Preservation Survey of Moving Image and Recorded Sound Collections (72 lines)
      From: Hannah Frost <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:28:00 -0800

17. call for submissions - apologies for cross posting
    • call for submissions - apologies for cross posting (262 lines)
      From: Richard Billeaud <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:04:43 +0100

18. Cart Equipment and Repairs
    • Cart Equipment and Repairs (26 lines)
      From: Raphael Mazzone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:39:16 -0500
    • Re: Cart Equipment and Repairs (49 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:09:06 -0500
    • Re: Cart Equipment and Repairs (39 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:41:51 -0800
    • Re: Cart Equipment and Repairs (30 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:06:11 -0800

19. Cassette tape with LOL
    • Cassette tape with LOL (43 lines)
      From: Aurora Perez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:15:49 -0800

20. Civil War recordings
    • Civil War recordings (56 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:25:18 -0800
    • Re: Civil War recordings (60 lines)
      From: Paul Tyler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:46:15 -0800
    • Re: Civil War recordings (94 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:54:10 -0800
    • Re: Civil War recordings (147 lines)
      From: Paul T. Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:03:45 -0800
    • Re: Civil War recordings (76 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:20:12 -0500

21. Commercial - New Auction List Now Available
    • Commercial - New Auction List Now Available (67 lines)
      From: Hawthorn's Antique Audio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:38:17 -0800
    • Re: Commercial - New Auction List Now Available (21 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 09:53:04 EST

22. Concert Phonograph Question
    • Concert Phonograph Question (25 lines)
      From: Spencer Secoy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:42:19 -0800

23. Copyright pressure put on Canada...
    • Copyright pressure put on Canada... (20 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:14:58 -0500
    • Re: Copyright pressure put on Canada... (34 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:35:01 -0500
    • Re: Copyright pressure put on Canada... (43 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:55:33 -0500
    • Re: Copyright pressure put on Canada... (37 lines)
      From: Jonathan Wise <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:39:24 -0500
    • Re: Copyright pressure put on Canada... (37 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:08:48 -0800
    • Re: Copyright pressure put on Canada... (57 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:11:05 -0800
    • Re: Copyright pressure put on Canada... (48 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:25:06 -0600
    • Re: Copyright pressure put on Canada... (35 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:10:39 -0500
    • Re: Copyright pressure put on Canada... (75 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:05:35 -0600
    • Re: Copyright pressure put on Canada... (43 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:31:11 -0500
    • Re: Copyright pressure put on Canada... (46 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:31:21 -0600
    • Re: Copyright pressure put on Canada... (37 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:59:20 -0500

24. Copyright question
    • Copyright question (20 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:41:58 -0800
    • Re: Copyright question (49 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:59:57 -0500
    • Re: Copyright question (33 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:03:18 -0800
    • Re: Copyright question (45 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:39:37 -0500
    • Re: Copyright question (33 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:01:35 -0800

25. Curious--was: well, this might <snip>
    • Curious--was: well, this might <snip> (22 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:08:06 -0500
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip> (30 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:06:53 -0500
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip> (102 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:15:42 -0800
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip> (71 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:41:42 -0500
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip> (99 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:41:11 -0500
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip> (140 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:19:47 -0800
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip> (92 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:30:32 -0500
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip> (37 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:54:12 -0500
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip> (51 lines)
      From: Mal Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:01:43 -1000
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip> (61 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:12:41 -0500
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip> (44 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:16:22 -0500
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip> (124 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:35:54 -0800
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip> (261 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:11:24 -0800
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip> (39 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:43:29 -0500
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip> (214 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:44:34 -0800

26. Curious--was: well, this might <snip>Questions galore !
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip>Questions galore ! (109 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:47:43 -0800
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip>Questions galore ! (315 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:58:09 -0800
    • Re: Curious--was: well, this might <snip>Questions galore ! (44 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:05:40 -0500

27. DAT Archival Housing
    • DAT Archival Housing (25 lines)
      From: Farris Wahbeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:43:18 -0500
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (38 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:01:37 -0500
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (57 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:55:49 -0500
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (81 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 17:27:50 -0500
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (24 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:21:46 -0500
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (30 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:33:49 -0500
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (62 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:44:16 -0600
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (89 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:11:19 -0500
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (140 lines)
      From: Jerry Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:50:35 -0500
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (42 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:56:06 -0600
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (43 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:15:20 -0500
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (32 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:31:45 -0500
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (27 lines)
      From: Farris Wahbeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:38:26 -0600
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (25 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 06:43:57 -0800
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (43 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:59:46 -0500
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (45 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:58:06 -0500
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (35 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:23:21 -0600
    • Re: DAT Archival Housing (51 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:26:57 -0500

28. Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow
    • Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow (45 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:42:11 -0800
    • Re: Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow (23 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:48:40 -0500
    • Re: Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow (25 lines)
      From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:26:58 -0500
    • Re: Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow (51 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:10:59 -0500
    • Re: Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow (38 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:21:49 -0800
    • Re: Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow (53 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:00:27 -0500
    • Re: Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow (28 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:44:13 +0000
    • Re: Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow (30 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 10:14:49 -0500

29. eBay seller
    • eBay seller (18 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:16:06 -0500

30. Ellington, wasRe: [ARSCLIST] Harry Carney
    • Ellington, wasRe: [ARSCLIST] Harry Carney (142 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 15:25:16 -0600
    • Re: Ellington, wasRe: [ARSCLIST] Harry Carney (149 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 17:28:56 -0500
    • Re: Ellington, wasRe: [ARSCLIST] Harry Carney (172 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 17:46:07 -0500
    • Re: Ellington, wasRe: [ARSCLIST] Harry Carney (227 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 15:55:37 -0800
    • Re: Ellington, wasRe: [ARSCLIST] Harry Carney (28 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 21:01:41 -0500
    • Re: Ellington, wasRe: [ARSCLIST] Harry Carney (43 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 20:12:35 -0600
    • Re: Ellington, wasRe: [ARSCLIST] Harry Carney (29 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 09:36:46 +0000

31. EMI Music Boss:The CD Is Dead
    • EMI Music Boss:The CD Is Dead (34 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:41:25 -0800
    • Re: EMI Music Boss:The CD Is Dead (38 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:10:57 -0800
    • Re: EMI Music Boss:The CD Is Dead (105 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:53:22 -0500
    • Re: EMI Music Boss:The CD Is Dead (132 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:56:43 -0800

32. Empire turntables
    • Empire turntables (27 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:28:26 -0800
    • Re: Empire turntables (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:53:06 -0800
    • Re: Empire turntables (60 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:37:50 -0500
    • Re: Empire turntables (39 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:42:55 -0500
    • Re: Empire turntables (53 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:14:27 -0500
    • Re: Empire turntables (80 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:29:02 -0600
    • Re: Empire turntables (29 lines)
      From: Jos Van Dyck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 12:02:45 +0100
    • Re: Empire turntables (243 lines)
      From: Jim Baldwin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 08:50:34 -0500

33. Erno Balogh - Bach recordings - Asch/Disc/Stinson
    • Erno Balogh - Bach recordings - Asch/Disc/Stinson (22 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:25:11 -0500

34. Extracurricular activities for ARSC Conference
    • Extracurricular activities for ARSC Conference (27 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 11:23:41 -0500

35. Favor needed: receiving parcels, Buffalo area
    • Favor needed: receiving parcels, Buffalo area (27 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 00:50:29 -0500

36. February Issue of Black Grooves
    • February Issue of Black Grooves (75 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 14:16:55 -0500

37. Fixing damaged LP jackets...
    • Fixing damaged LP jackets... (43 lines)
      From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:54:48 -0500
    • Re: Fixing damaged LP jackets... (68 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:08:50 -0800
    • Re: Fixing damaged LP jackets... (54 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:11:33 -0500
    • Re: Fixing damaged LP jackets... (83 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 23:20:15 -0500
    • Re: Fixing damaged LP jackets... (98 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:41:53 -0800
    • Re: Fixing damaged LP jackets... (24 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:27:39 -0500
    • Re: Fixing damaged LP jackets... (34 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:26:25 -0600
    • Re: Fixing damaged LP jackets... (17 lines)
      From: Juan Moreno <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:41:18 EST
    • Re: Fixing damaged LP jackets... (28 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:44:30 -0500
    • Re: Fixing damaged LP jackets... (47 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:06:27 -0800
    • Re: Fixing damaged LP jackets... (38 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:52:55 -0800
    • Re: Fixing damaged LP jackets... (48 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:42:27 -0600
    • Re: Fixing damaged LP jackets... (60 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:58:56 -0800
    • Re: Fixing damaged LP jackets... (60 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:00:33 -0800
    • Re: Fixing damaged LP jackets... (71 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:07:23 -0600
    • Re: Fixing damaged LP jackets... (51 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:12:54 -0500

38. flash recorder recommendations
    • flash recorder recommendations (45 lines)
      From: Trey Bunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:10:13 -0600
    • Re: flash recorder recommendations (78 lines)
      From: Greg Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:46:01 -0600
    • Re: flash recorder recommendations (108 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:43:10 -0500
    • Re: flash recorder recommendations (68 lines)
      From: Alec McLane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:22:54 -0500
    • Re: flash recorder recommendations (86 lines)
      From: Andy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:30:10 -0500

39. Fraudulent recordings
    • Fraudulent recordings (21 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:12:11 +0000
    • Re: Fraudulent recordings (41 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:36:41 -0800
    • Re: Fraudulent recordings (36 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:46:37 -0600

40. Future of DRM and record cos. (was: interesting!)
    • Re: Future of DRM and record cos. (was: interesting!) (23 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:17:14 -0500

41. Fwd: RE: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work
    • Fwd: RE: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (77 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:47:49 -0500

42. Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work
    • Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (68 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 03:52:04 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (35 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:57:06 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (43 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:44:52 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (49 lines)
      From: Rollin' Recording <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:43:28 -0600
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (64 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:52:07 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (47 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 07:55:47 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (43 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:47:54 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (46 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:17:03 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (38 lines)
      From: seva <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:34:27 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (34 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:51:43 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (57 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:17:21 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (59 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:23:38 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (89 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:57:31 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (27 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:50:32 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (35 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:42:01 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (42 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:44:19 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (109 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 14:23:13 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [AMIA-L] Firesign Theatre Looking for recordings of their Work (123 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 17:49:05 -0500

43. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Bernstein info needed
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Bernstein info needed (55 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:53:42 EST

44. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Darlene Edwards (was: Rosemary Brown)
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Darlene Edwards (was: Rosemary Brown) (184 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 19:21:08 EST
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Darlene Edwards (was: Rosemary Brown) (64 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 19:35:32 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Darlene Edwards (was: Rosemary Brown) (36 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:04:24 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Darlene Edwards (was: Rosemary Brown) (24 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 20:10:47 -0500

45. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Strauss Japanese Festival Music
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Strauss Japanese Festival Music (71 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:18:37 EST

46. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Rosemary Brown
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Rosemary Brown (104 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:57:29 EST
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Rosemary Brown (22 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 06:57:10 -0800

47. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Strauss Japanese Festival Music
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Strauss Japanese Festival Music (53 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:35:26 EST

48. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Unique piece of phonographic/TV history.
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Unique piece of phonographic/TV history. (55 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:56:03 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Unique piece of phonographic/TV history. (74 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:17:55 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Unique piece of phonographic/TV history. (85 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:30:17 -0800

49. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Willem van Hoogstraten
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Willem van Hoogstraten (108 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:42:56 EST
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Willem van Hoogstraten (110 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:49:00 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Willem van Hoogstraten (141 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:06:42 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Willem van Hoogstraten (76 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:04:55 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Willem van Hoogstraten (81 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:58:05 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Willem van Hoogstraten (156 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:44:11 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Willem van Hoogstraten (90 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:15:08 -0800
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Willem van Hoogstraten (31 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:53:54 -0500

50. Gassy inner sleeves
    • Gassy inner sleeves (52 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:34:55 -0500
    • Re: Gassy inner sleeves (107 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:08:38 -0500
    • Re: Gassy inner sleeves (125 lines)
      From: Rollin' Recording <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:12:55 -0600

51. Good blank media for sale cheap
    • Good blank media for sale cheap (17 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:43:04 -0500
    • Re: Good blank media for sale cheap (26 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:00:21 -0500
    • Re: Good blank media for sale cheap (22 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:41:21 -0500

52. Harry Carney
    • Harry Carney (15 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 22:18:56 -0600
    • Re: Harry Carney (43 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 17:44:55 +0000
    • Re: Harry Carney (84 lines)
      From: Michael Fitzgerald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 13:25:20 -0500
    • Re: Harry Carney (93 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 13:45:17 -0600
    • Re: Harry Carney (124 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 14:55:54 -0500
    • Re: Harry Carney (114 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 15:40:36 -0500
    • Re: Harry Carney (140 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 15:42:47 -0500
    • Re: Harry Carney (106 lines)
      From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 21:47:10 +0100

53. Harry Carney - La Plus Belle Africaine
    • Re: Harry Carney - La Plus Belle Africaine (119 lines)
      From: eugene hayhoe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:45:17 -0800

54. Independent recording studios- was STADIUM SYMPHONY
    • Re: Independent recording studios- was STADIUM SYMPHONY (56 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:59:17 -0500
    • Re: Independent recording studios- was STADIUM SYMPHONY (25 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 12:44:53 -0500
    • Re: Independent recording studios- was STADIUM SYMPHONY (55 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:59:56 -0800

55. Industrial Design Historians Seek Help in Selecting Technology
    • Industrial Design Historians Seek Help in Selecting Technology (30 lines)
      From: Barbara Egan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:24:09 -0500
    • Re: Industrial Design Historians Seek Help in Selecting Technology (73 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:45:33 -0500
    • Re: Industrial Design Historians Seek Help in Selecting Technology (88 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:07:34 -0500
    • Re: Industrial Design Historians Seek Help in Selecting Technology (98 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:27:42 -0500
    • Re: Industrial Design Historians Seek Help in Selecting Technology (24 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:49:28 -0500
    • Re: Industrial Design Historians Seek Help in Selecting Technology (34 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:49:59 -0500
    • Re: Industrial Design Historians Seek Help in Selecting Technology (42 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:11:00 -0800
    • Re: Industrial Design Historians Seek Help in Selecting Technology (53 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:26:35 -0500

56. interesting!
    • interesting! (47 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 06:34:08 -0500
    • Re: interesting! (34 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 08:15:26 -0500
    • Re: interesting! (24 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 06:37:53 -0800
    • Re: interesting! (57 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:40:18 -0600
    • Re: interesting! (80 lines)
      From: Paul T. Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:06:28 -0800
    • Re: interesting! (57 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:42:53 -0500
    • Re: interesting! (106 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:14:25 -0500
    • Re: interesting! (149 lines)
      From: Paul T. Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 21:17:55 -0800
    • Re: interesting! (99 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:11:56 -0500
    • Re: interesting! (22 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 06:13:04 -0800
    • Re: interesting! (45 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 06:48:42 -0800
    • Re: interesting! (106 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:21:51 -0500
    • Re: interesting! (46 lines)
      From: Paul T. Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:13:58 -0800
    • Re: interesting! (36 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:25:44 -0800
    • Re: interesting! (51 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 13:51:36 -0500
    • Re: interesting! (130 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:08:39 -0500
    • Re: interesting! (40 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 13:02:50 -0800
    • Re: interesting! (28 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:23:52 -0500
    • Re: interesting! (112 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 17:43:59 -0800

57. Jewel Sleeve (was The STiL Case
    • Re: Jewel Sleeve (was The STiL Case (42 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:19:30 -0500
    • Re: Jewel Sleeve (was The STiL Case (61 lines)
      From: Elliott Hancock <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:57:21 -0600
    • Re: Jewel Sleeve (was The STiL Case (36 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 00:09:55 -0500

58. Label confusion
    • Label confusion (17 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 10:35:51 -0500
    • Re: Label confusion (42 lines)
      From: Michael Fitzgerald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:39:27 -0500
    • Re: Label confusion (54 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:50:26 -0500
    • Re: Label confusion (55 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:57:53 -0500

59. Lennick's garage sale..shameless plug plus pretty pictures
    • Lennick's garage sale..shameless plug plus pretty pictures (34 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:19:31 -0500

60. Library of Congress vacancy - NAVCC Operations Manager
    • Library of Congress vacancy - NAVCC Operations Manager (46 lines)
      From: Gregory Lukow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:12:49 -0500

61. Listening Copy
    • Listening Copy (28 lines)
      From: Farris Wahbeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 15:39:36 -0500
    • Re: Listening Copy (27 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 15:13:49 -0600
    • Re: Listening Copy (43 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:17:47 -0500
    • Re: Listening Copy (41 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 14:39:14 -0800
    • Re: Listening Copy (55 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:40:04 -0500
    • Re: Listening Copy (63 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:05:02 -0500
    • Re: Listening Copy (38 lines)
      From: Farris Wahbeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:03:49 -0600
    • Re: Listening Copy (65 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:18:07 -0500
    • Re: Listening Copy (105 lines)
      From: Bertram Lyons <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:04:06 -0700
    • Re: Listening Copy (78 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:32:36 +0000
    • Re: Listening Copy (51 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:58:21 +0000
    • Re: Listening Copy (74 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:19:35 -0500
    • Re: Listening Copy (27 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:32:32 -0600
    • Re: Listening Copy (53 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:47:10 -0800
    • Re: Listening Copy (73 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:14:33 -0500

62. Lookee what I found.Was : LP storage for box sets
    • Re: Lookee what I found.Was : LP storage for box sets (57 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:06:18 -0800
    • Re: Lookee what I found.Was : LP storage for box sets (70 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:23:52 -0500

63. LP storage for box sets
    • LP storage for box sets (18 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 23:30:28 -0500
    • Re: LP storage for box sets (27 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:06:49 -0800
    • Re: LP storage for box sets (46 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:17:26 -0500
    • Re: LP storage for box sets (38 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:27:30 -0500
    • Re: LP storage for box sets (57 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:45:27 -0500
    • Re: LP storage for box sets (70 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:08:10 -0800
    • Re: LP storage for box sets (61 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:19:10 -0500
    • Re: LP storage for box sets (27 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:51:23 +0000
    • Re: LP storage for box sets (33 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:10:33 -0500
    • Re: LP storage for box sets (43 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:55:08 -0800
    • Re: LP storage for box sets (45 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:07:16 -0500
    • Re: LP storage for box sets (26 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:29:20 -0500
    • Re: LP storage for box sets (38 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:34:27 -0500
    • Re: LP storage for box sets (37 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:30:01 -0800

64. MAM-A Gold Discs
    • Re: MAM-A Gold Discs (25 lines)
      From: Elliott Hancock <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:26:42 -0600
    • Re: MAM-A Gold Discs (41 lines)
      From: Jerry Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:24:11 -0500

65. MAR Bernstein New World Questions Was: Bernstein info needed
    • Re: MAR Bernstein New World Questions Was: Bernstein info needed (99 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 15:14:01 -0800

66. Matrix numbers sought
    • Matrix numbers sought (19 lines)
      From: Larry Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:10:45 -0500
    • Re: Matrix numbers sought (35 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:06:40 -0800

67. MP3 patent dispute
    • MP3 patent dispute (21 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:12:04 -0500
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (38 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:50:45 -0800
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (34 lines)
      From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:52:47 -0600
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (42 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:44:14 -0800
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (26 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:27:15 -0500
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (49 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:47:57 -0500
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (34 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:18:08 -0500
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (36 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:43:38 -0500
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (28 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:46:14 -0500
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (35 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:52:16 -0800
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (37 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 01:36:53 -0500
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (21 lines)
      From: Dave Nolan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 09:35:25 -0500
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (24 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:51:33 -0500
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (26 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:09:57 -0500
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (31 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 09:13:16 -0800
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (29 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:20:42 -0500
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (37 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:33:51 -0800
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (49 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:34:44 -0800
    • Re: MP3 patent dispute (27 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:23:13 -0500

68. Musical uses for CDs
    • Musical uses for CDs (20 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:01:39 -0800

69. nakamichi dragon problem
    • nakamichi dragon problem (55 lines)
      From: Trey Bunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:53:04 -0600
    • Re: nakamichi dragon problem (72 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:26:29 -0500
    • Re: nakamichi dragon problem (84 lines)
      From: andy kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:32:25 -0500
    • Re: nakamichi dragon problem (82 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:54:13 -0500
    • Re: nakamichi dragon problem (34 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 13:47:55 -0500
    • Re: nakamichi dragon problem (49 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 13:38:59 -0600

70. NFL--was: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst
    • NFL--was: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (23 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 20:18:29 -0500
    • Re: NFL--was: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (38 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 21:12:07 -0500
    • Re: NFL--was: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (47 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 22:18:46 -0500

71. offlist archival question from ARSC list member
    • Re: offlist archival question from ARSC list member (378 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:20:06 -0800
    • Re: offlist archival question from ARSC list member (151 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:40:23 -0500

72. Oscar Levant
    • Oscar Levant (21 lines)
      From: Darlene Brandt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:46:47 -0800
    • Re: Oscar Levant (36 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:17:12 -0500
    • Re: Oscar Levant (30 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:26:03 -0800
    • Re: Oscar Levant (42 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:45:10 -0500
    • Re: Oscar Levant (70 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:05:14 -0600
    • Re: Oscar Levant (65 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:44:35 -0500
    • Re: Oscar Levant (38 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:14:06 -0800
    • Re: Oscar Levant (18 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:01:09 -0800
    • Re: Oscar Levant (29 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:06:19 -0500
    • Re: Oscar Levant (45 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:01:50 -0800
    • Re: Oscar Levant (19 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:35:50 -0800
    • Re: Oscar Levant (20 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:00:44 -0800
    • Re: Oscar Levant (27 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:47:40 -0500
    • Re: Oscar Levant (34 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:54:31 -0500
    • Re: Oscar Levant (40 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:05:47 -0800
    • Re: Oscar Levant (31 lines)
      From: Darlene Brandt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:21:38 -0800
    • Re: Oscar Levant (46 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:54:55 -0800
    • Re: Oscar Levant (38 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:31:32 -0500
    • Re: Oscar Levant (49 lines)
      From: Darlene Brandt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:17:36 -0800
    • Re: Oscar Levant (57 lines)
      From: Darlene Brandt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:20:47 -0800
    • Re: Oscar Levant (58 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:33:01 -0500
    • Re: Oscar Levant (69 lines)
      From: Darlene Brandt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:33:44 -0800
    • Re: Oscar Levant (64 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:56:48 -0800

73. Packing & Sending Records
    • Packing & Sending Records (18 lines)
      From: Martin Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:06:45 -0600

74. Paper on Mold Removal from Cellulose Acetate Audiotape
    • Paper on Mold Removal from Cellulose Acetate Audiotape (25 lines)
      From: Cybulski, Walter (NIH/NLM) [E] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:15:34 -0500
    • Re: Paper on Mold Removal from Cellulose Acetate Audiotape (37 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:05:35 -0500

75. Pay in the XXI Jhrt--was: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses
    • Pay in the XXI Jhrt--was: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (49 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:55:26 -0500

76. Please take me off of list
    • Please take me off of list (89 lines)
      From: Mark W. Downs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:58:05 -0600
    • Re: Please take me off of list (133 lines)
      From: Rollin' Recording <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 17:36:17 -0600
    • Re: Please take me off of list (38 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:47:39 -0500

77. RE : [ARSCLIST] The STiL Case
    • RE : [ARSCLIST] The STiL Case (85 lines)
      From: Andre Pion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:11:35 -0500

78. Record label geneology
    • Record label geneology (22 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:41:47 -0800

79. Ref info needed - do you have early Schwann catalogs (before May 1955) or Myers Index?
    • Ref info needed - do you have early Schwann catalogs (before May 1955) or Myers Index? (22 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:45:42 -0500
    • Re: Ref info needed - do you have early Schwann catalogs (before May 1955) or Myers Index? (31 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:12:07 -0800
    • Re: Ref info needed - do you have early Schwann catalogs (before May 1955) or Myers Index? (33 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:37:02 -0500
    • Ref info needed - do you have early Schwann catalogs (before May 1955) or Myers Index? (23 lines)
      From: Jack Raymond <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:44:25 -0500
    • Re: Ref info needed - do you have early Schwann catalogs (before May 1955) or Myers Index? (34 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:02:51 -0500
    • Re: Ref info needed - do you have early Schwann catalogs (before May 1955) or Myers Index? (48 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:13:38 -0800
    • Re: Ref info needed - do you have early Schwann catalogs (before May 1955) or Myers Index? (38 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:27:09 -0800
    • Re: Ref info needed - do you have early Schwann catalogs (before May 1955) or Myers Index? (60 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:41:01 -0500
    • Re: Ref info needed - do you have early Schwann catalogs (before May 1955) or Myers Index? (23 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:22:21 -0500

80. Repair of Technics SP-15 turntable
    • Repair of Technics SP-15 turntable (29 lines)
      From: Michael Cogswell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:56:34 -0500

81. Richard Nanes
    • Re: Richard Nanes (35 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 00:12:07 EST
    • Re: Richard Nanes (65 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 23:13:58 -0500
    • Re: Richard Nanes (76 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 00:39:20 -0500
    • Re: Richard Nanes (32 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 08:20:36 -0500

82. Roommate for Milwaukee
    • Roommate for Milwaukee (18 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:23:20 -0500
    • Re: Roommate for Milwaukee (34 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:26:40 -0800
    • Re: Roommate for Milwaukee (22 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:26:16 EST

83. Rosie Sheets (Mrs. Mac Sheets) has died
    • Rosie Sheets (Mrs. Mac Sheets) has died (31 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:41:50 EST

84. SACD for Real Collectors
    • Re: SACD for Real Collectors (51 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:49:09 -0000

85. seeking discography info -- Dizzy Gillespie album
    • seeking discography info -- Dizzy Gillespie album (36 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 07:20:02 -0500
    • Re: seeking discography info -- Dizzy Gillespie album (69 lines)
      From: eugene hayhoe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 04:55:56 -0800
    • Re: seeking discography info -- Dizzy Gillespie album (112 lines)
      From: Prentice, Will <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 13:44:47 -0000
    • Re: seeking discography info -- Dizzy Gillespie album (89 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:05:50 -0500
    • Re: seeking discography info -- Dizzy Gillespie album (119 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:07:23 -0500
    • Re: seeking discography info -- Dizzy Gillespie album (63 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:08:20 -0500
    • Re: seeking discography info -- Dizzy Gillespie album (23 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:36:38 -0500
    • Re: seeking discography info -- Dizzy Gillespie album (47 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 10:47:16 +0000
    • Re: seeking discography info -- Dizzy Gillespie album (81 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:56:25 -0500
    • Re: seeking discography info -- Dizzy Gillespie album (101 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:56:30 -0800
    • Re: seeking discography info -- Dizzy Gillespie album (38 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:56:48 -0500
    • Re: seeking discography info -- Dizzy Gillespie album (53 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:06:29 -0800

86. Smolian's name under the label
    • Smolian's name under the label (21 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 15:26:19 -0500
    • Re: Smolian's name under the label (40 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 15:52:56 -0600
    • Re: Smolian's name under the label (38 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 18:08:05 -0500
    • Re: Smolian's name under the label (24 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 20:39:13 -0500

87. Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst
    • Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (25 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 20:06:46 -0800
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (38 lines)
      From: Bertram Lyons <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 21:30:57 -0700
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (105 lines)
      From: Paul T. Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 22:41:37 -0800
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (110 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 09:12:17 -0500
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (125 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 09:48:40 -0500
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (160 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 10:49:06 -0500
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (185 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:19:23 -0500
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (157 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:40:02 -0500
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (200 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:55:55 -0500
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (263 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 12:28:06 -0500
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (245 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 14:15:04 -0500
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (37 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 19:58:22 -0500
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (45 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 19:57:37 -0500
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (33 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 20:04:53 -0500
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (22 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 20:10:06 -0500
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (123 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 17:47:50 -0800
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (48 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 21:13:42 -0500
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (175 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 19:24:55 -0800
    • Re: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (37 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 15:14:33 -0800

88. Somebody monetize me...!!--was:^ Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow
    • Somebody monetize me...!!--was:^ Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow (22 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 23:34:46 -0500
    • Re: Somebody monetize me...!!--was:^ Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow (31 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 23:34:51 -0500
    • Re: Somebody monetize me...!!--was:^ Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow (29 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:27:05 -0500
    • Re: Somebody monetize me...!!--was:^ Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow (36 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:33:21 -0500
    • Re: Somebody monetize me...!!--was:^ Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow (42 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:55:40 -0500
    • Re: Somebody monetize me...!!--was:^ Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow (51 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:06:13 -0500

89. Somewhat old but interesting article
    • Somewhat old but interesting article (20 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 07:59:11 -0800

90. speaking of LP storage...
    • speaking of LP storage... (22 lines)
      From: D. Blake Werts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:09:45 -0500
    • Re: speaking of LP storage... (36 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:21:03 -0800
    • Re: speaking of LP storage... (60 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:00:15 -0500
    • Re: speaking of LP storage... (92 lines)
      From: D. Blake Werts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:15:01 -0500
    • Re: speaking of LP storage... (108 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:04:28 -0500
    • Re: speaking of LP storage... (126 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:29:53 -0500
    • Re: speaking of LP storage... (32 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:29:53 -0800
    • Re: speaking of LP storage... (38 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:57:48 -0800
    • Re: speaking of LP storage... (51 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:59:44 -0800
    • Re: speaking of LP storage... (122 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:06:12 -0800

91. STADIUM SYMPHONY
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (16 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 05:39:50 -0800
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (23 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 11:21:31 -0500
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (34 lines)
      From: Aaron Z Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 11:32:25 -0500
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (29 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 08:37:48 -0800
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (24 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 08:56:47 -0800
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (39 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:27:45 -0500
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (21 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 09:42:12 -0800
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (42 lines)
      From: Aaron Z Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:59:03 -0500
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (21 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 11:28:10 -0800
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (30 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:22:34 -0800
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (55 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:33:09 -0800
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (65 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:42:43 -0500
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (43 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:45:27 -0800
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (92 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:53:13 -0800
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (106 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 20:00:19 -0800
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (105 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 23:05:52 -0500
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (22 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 00:37:15 -0500
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (19 lines)
      From: Eric Goldberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:22:34 +0200
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (24 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 10:44:38 -0500
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY (38 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:46:27 -0800

92. Stadium Symphony Orchestra concerts
    • Re: Stadium Symphony Orchestra concerts (64 lines)
      From: Thom Pease <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 13:05:08 -0800
    • Re: Stadium Symphony Orchestra concerts (91 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 23:31:10 -0500
    • Re: Stadium Symphony Orchestra concerts (89 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 23:38:12 -0500
    • Re: Stadium Symphony Orchestra concerts (120 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 21:25:40 -0800

93. STADIUM SYMPHONY was Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein
    • STADIUM SYMPHONY was Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein (29 lines)
      From: Eric Goldberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 17:05:51 +0200
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY was Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein (45 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 19:05:32 -0800
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY was Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein (61 lines)
      From: Larry Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 22:23:07 -0500
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY was Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein (70 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 22:38:52 -0500
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY was Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein (105 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 23:20:20 -0500
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY was Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein (63 lines)
      From: Eric Goldberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 00:05:36 +0200
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY was Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein (87 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 14:32:11 -0800
    • Re: STADIUM SYMPHONY was Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein (84 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 15:31:20 -0800

94. Steve Jobs urges labels to set the music free
    • Steve Jobs urges labels to set the music free (40 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:20:27 -0800
    • Re: Steve Jobs urges labels to set the music free (38 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:11:36 -0500

95. Storing 16" transcription discs
    • Storing 16" transcription discs (37 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:14:03 -0500
    • Re: Storing 16" transcription discs (59 lines)
      From: Nigel Champion (FOA ANT) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:22:55 +1300
    • Re: Storing 16" transcription discs (56 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:38:15 -0500
    • Re: Storing 16" transcription discs (74 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:30:36 -0500
    • Re: Storing 16" transcription discs (37 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:44:57 -0500
    • Re: Storing 16" transcription discs (61 lines)
      From: Eugene DeAnna <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:58:36 -0500
    • Re: Storing 16" transcription discs (71 lines)
      From: Sam Brylawski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:14:50 -0500
    • Re: Storing 16" transcription discs (88 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:18:19 -0500
    • Re: Storing 16" transcription discs (86 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:31:22 -0500
    • Re: Storing 16" transcription discs (111 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:31:04 -0500
    • Re: Storing 16" transcription discs (153 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:25:18 -0500

96. Subject doesn't matter...
    • Subject doesn't matter... (26 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:37:24 -0500
    • Re: Subject doesn't matter... (32 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:55:42 -0800

97. Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed
    • Re: Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed (47 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 19:41:50 -0800
    • Re: Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed (54 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 22:51:06 -0500
    • Re: Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed (95 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 00:34:20 -0500
    • Re: Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed (24 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 06:10:18 -0800
    • Re: Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed (131 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:25:46 -0800
    • Re: Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed (112 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:58:02 -0800
    • Re: Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed (142 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 23:50:24 -0500
    • Re: Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed (23 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 08:25:28 -0800
    • Re: Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed (35 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:41:59 -0500
    • Re: Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed (76 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 19:47:00 -0500
    • Re: Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed (35 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 21:17:43 EST
    • Re: Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed (49 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 19:33:06 -0800
    • Re: Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed (46 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 23:01:31 -0500
    • Re: Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed (117 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 20:43:21 -0800
    • Re: Szell on MAR Was:Bernstein info needed (76 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 01:25:39 -0500

98. Technical committee. Ipod, etc.
    • Re: Technical committee. Ipod, etc. (64 lines)
      From: John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:26:08 -0600

99. The STiL Case
    • The STiL Case (45 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 23:37:08 -0800
    • Re: The STiL Case (66 lines)
      From: Martin Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 08:28:45 -0600
    • Re: The STiL Case (41 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:46:42 -0500
    • Re: The STiL Case (71 lines)
      From: Elliott Hancock <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 08:51:57 -0600
    • Re: The STiL Case (32 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 07:34:17 -0800
    • Re: The STiL Case (106 lines)
      From: Martin Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:22:23 -0600
    • Re: The STiL Case (51 lines)
      From: Jerry Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:23:51 -0500
    • Re: The STiL Case (56 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:51:06 -0500
    • Re: The STiL Case (77 lines)
      From: Craig Breaden <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:31:07 -0500

100. They're still making vinyl
     • They're still making vinyl (114 lines)
       From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 09:38:33 EST
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (23 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:07:24 -0500
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (24 lines)
       From: Jack Raymond <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 08:02:42 -0500
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (53 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 08:44:34 -0500
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (37 lines)
       From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 10:31:46 -0500
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (91 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:30:40 -0800
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (32 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:32:07 -0800
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (76 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:05:09 -0500
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (60 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:22:06 -0800
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (93 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:40:13 -0500
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (34 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:46:53 -0800
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (57 lines)
       From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:10:52 -0800
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (41 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:11:31 -0600
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (74 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:37:36 -0600
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (25 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:12:51 -0500
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (91 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:06:26 -0800
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (101 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:37:47 -0600
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (55 lines)
       From: Rod Smear <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 07:55:50 -0800
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (36 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:47:24 -0500
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (86 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:12:48 -0800
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (51 lines)
       From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:06:29 -0800
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (70 lines)
       From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:08:55 -0000
     • Re: They're still making vinyl (78 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:17:23 -0600

101. Those CSI wizards!
     • Those CSI wizards! (22 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:19:15 -0800

102. Transporting 10 inch pancakes
     • Transporting 10 inch pancakes (27 lines)
       From: Jerry McBride <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:59:44 -0800
     • Re: Transporting 10 inch pancakes (72 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:26:45 -0500
     • Re: Transporting 10 inch pancakes (28 lines)
       From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:37:17 -0600
     • Re: Transporting 10 inch pancakes (37 lines)
       From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:48:05 -0800
     • Re: Transporting 10 inch pancakes (87 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:56:03 -0500
     • Re: Transporting 10 inch pancakes (52 lines)
       From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:27:06 -0600
     • Re: Transporting 10 inch pancakes (80 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 19:41:14 -0500
     • Re: Transporting 10 inch pancakes (40 lines)
       From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 20:45:25 -0800
     • Re: Transporting 10 inch pancakes (94 lines)
       From: Kiwi O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:37:33 -0800
     • Re: Transporting 10 inch pancakes (103 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 00:35:31 -0500
     • Re: Transporting 10 inch pancakes (131 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 00:51:30 -0500

103. Unique piece of phonographic/TV history.
     • Unique piece of phonographic/TV history. (23 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 22:17:25 -0800
     • Re: Unique piece of phonographic/TV history. (39 lines)
       From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 09:52:00 -0500
     • Re: Unique piece of phonographic/TV history. (55 lines)
       From: Jeanette Berard <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:16:59 -0800
     • Re: Unique piece of phonographic/TV history. (66 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:34:40 -0500
     • Re: Unique piece of phonographic/TV history. (50 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:01:31 -0800
     • Re: Unique piece of phonographic/TV history. (33 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:04:26 -0500

104. Using desiccant with audio recordings
     • Using desiccant with audio recordings (23 lines)
       From: Language Archives <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:50:33 -0600
     • Re: Using desiccant with audio recordings (29 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:17:21 -0800
     • Re: Using desiccant with audio recordings (62 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:40:50 -0500
     • Re: Using desiccant with audio recordings (79 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:53:48 -0800
     • Re: Using desiccant with audio recordings (72 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:55:58 -0500
     • Re: Using desiccant with audio recordings (42 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:29:11 -0500
     • Re: Using desiccant with audio recordings (104 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:15:09 -0500
     • Re: Using desiccant with audio recordings (113 lines)
       From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:00:42 -0500
     • Re: Using desiccant with audio recordings (134 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:10:20 -0500
     • Re: Using desiccant with audio recordings (131 lines)
       From: Mal Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:43:06 -1000
     • Re: Using desiccant with audio recordings (103 lines)
       From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:20:11 -0800

105. Watermarking
     • Watermarking (19 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:57:32 -0500
     • Re: Watermarking (37 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:55:18 -0500

106. Welcome to "now"--was: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst
     • Welcome to "now"--was: Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst (29 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 23:17:27 -0500

107. well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouse
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouse (59 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:20:51 -0500

108. well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses
     • well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (25 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 07:10:12 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (48 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 07:04:45 -0800
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (61 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 10:30:37 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (98 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 10:51:39 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (131 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:03:34 -0600
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (26 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:11:00 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (48 lines)
       From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:38:51 -0600
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (37 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:42:59 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (69 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:12:42 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (26 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:26:43 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (49 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:30:09 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (42 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:51:16 -0800
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (47 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:24:07 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (34 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:02:42 -0800
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (78 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:44:22 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (28 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:57:46 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (121 lines)
       From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:05:25 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (38 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:04:23 -0800
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (164 lines)
       From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:13:29 -0800
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (28 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:30:33 -0800
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (94 lines)
       From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:01:55 -0800
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (36 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:35:11 -0800
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (94 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:46:34 -0800
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (117 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:53:06 -0800
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (25 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:14:47 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (24 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:40:41 -0800
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (92 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:09:02 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (25 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:21:30 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (83 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:33:34 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (112 lines)
       From: Sam Brylawski <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:34:13 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (32 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:38:29 -0600
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (37 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:40:43 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (32 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:58:18 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (42 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:22:13 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (62 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:59:38 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (28 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:18:20 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (24 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:33:14 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (25 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:53:19 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (43 lines)
       From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:21:59 -0600
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (52 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:07:28 -0600
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (52 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:16:57 -0800
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (51 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:22:30 -0800
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (36 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:45:44 -0500
     • Re: well, this might explain why so many sonic treasures languish in government warehouses (48 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:57:37 -0800

109. Whistling records
     • Whistling records (22 lines)
       From: Andy Lanset <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:37:49 -0500
     • Whistling records (22 lines)
       From: Andy Lanset <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:50:27 -0500
     • Re: Whistling records (30 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:23:09 -0500
     • Re: Whistling records (36 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:17:27 -0500
     • Re: Whistling records (54 lines)
       From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:01:34 -0500
     • Re: Whistling records (21 lines)
       From: Eric Goldberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:58:10 +0200
     • Re: Whistling records (26 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:59:44 -0500
     • Re: Whistling records (35 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 23:30:06 -0500
     • Re: Whistling records (37 lines)
       From: Andy Lanset <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:06:39 -0500

110. Willem van Hoogstraten
     • Willem van Hoogstraten (42 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 17:25:06 -0500
     • Re: Willem van Hoogstraten (42 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:09:48 -0800
     • Re: Willem van Hoogstraten (87 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:12:03 -0500

111. Winston Churchill Set
     • Winston Churchill Set (36 lines)
       From: Martin Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:50:17 -0600
     • Re: Winston Churchill Set (46 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 17:09:24 +0000
     • Re: Winston Churchill Set (70 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:29:31 -0500
     • Re: Winston Churchill Set (42 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 19:35:59 +0000
     • Re: Winston Churchill Set (18 lines)
       From: Martin Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:16:30 -0600

112. WOR at night, was STADIUM SYMPHONY
     • Re: WOR at night, was STADIUM SYMPHONY (24 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 14:55:17 EST

113. [LA]Re: [ARSCLIST] Using desiccant with audio recordings
     • Re: [LA]Re: [ARSCLIST] Using desiccant with audio recordings (35 lines)
       From: Language Archives <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:07:34 -0600
     • Re: [LA]Re: [ARSCLIST] Using desiccant with audio recordings (65 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:03:50 -0500

114. ^ Whistling records
     • Re: ^ Whistling records (19 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 23:05:51 -0500

115. ^Somebody monetize me...!!--was:^ Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow
     • Re: ^Somebody monetize me...!!--was:^ Despite lawsuits, digital music downloads grow (25 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:16:14 -0500