ARSCLIST Archives – January 2007

1. "Follow the Drinking Gourd" website
   • "Follow the Drinking Gourd" website (81 lines)
     From: Joel Bresler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:46:28 -0500

2. "Gabriel Over the White House"
   • "Gabriel Over the White House" (58 lines)
     From: Suzanne Whitehouse <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:33:02 -0500
   • Re: "Gabriel Over the White House" (79 lines)
     From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:27:11 -0500

3. "Men of HiFi" Harry Maynard tapes
   • "Men of HiFi" Harry Maynard tapes (51 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:42:15 -0500
   • Re: "Men of HiFi" Harry Maynard tapes (65 lines)
     From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:06:10 -0500
   • Re: "Men of HiFi" Harry Maynard tapes (85 lines)
     From: Andy Lanset <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:22:58 -0500
   • Re: "Men of HiFi" Harry Maynard tapes (98 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:01:12 -0500
   • Re: "Men of HiFi" Harry Maynard tapes (119 lines)
     From: Andy Lanset <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:17:09 -0500

4. 78 prices
   • 78 prices (26 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:46:22 -0800
   • Re: 78 prices (52 lines)
     From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:42:00 +0100

5. 78 rpm transfer in Montreal?
   • Re: 78 rpm transfer in Montreal? (48 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 23:27:53 -0800
   • Re: 78 rpm transfer in Montreal? (63 lines)
     From: eugene hayhoe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 05:17:55 -0800
   • Re: 78 rpm transfer in Montreal? (75 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:44:46 -0800
   • Re: 78 rpm transfer in Montreal? (86 lines)
     From: eugene hayhoe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:10:16 -0800

6. 78 rpm transfer is Montreal?
   • 78 rpm transfer is Montreal? (24 lines)
     From: John Black <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:57:33 -0500
   • Re: 78 rpm transfer is Montreal? (34 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:30:57 -0500

7. 9th Annual SURA/ViDe Digital Video Conference
   • 9th Annual SURA/ViDe Digital Video Conference (103 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:49:27 -0500

8. A decent compromise to get your LPs into your iPod
   • A decent compromise to get your LPs into your iPod (55 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:45:56 -0500

9. Acetate tape buffered by cardboard box
   • Acetate tape buffered by cardboard box (29 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:59:08 EST

10. Adhesive tape survey
    • Adhesive tape survey (42 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:05:15 -0500
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (57 lines)
      From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:35:50 -0500
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (77 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:45:09 -0500
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (89 lines)
      From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:58:22 -0500
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (101 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:11:17 -0500
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (97 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:28:18 -0600
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (98 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:31:29 -0600
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (107 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:09:36 -0500
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (22 lines)
      From: Alan Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:34:50 EST
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (32 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:38:44 -0700
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (82 lines)
      From: Mal Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:19:12 -1000
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (36 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:46:13 -0500
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (111 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:57:27 -0500
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (146 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:23:46 -0500
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (56 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:25:39 -0500
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (28 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:21:16 +0000
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (160 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:14:47 -0500
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (38 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:04:39 -0500
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (23 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:08:55 -0500
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (53 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:10:56 -0500
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (23 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:43:49 -0800
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (35 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:53:50 -0800
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (33 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:04:10 -0500
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (31 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:28:02 EST
    • Re: Adhesive tape survey (65 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:09:13 -0500

11. AFC invites applications: 2007 Parsons Fund Award
    • AFC invites applications: 2007 Parsons Fund Award (94 lines)
      From: Stephanie Aileen Hall <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:45:04 -0500

12. AFC invites applications: Blanton Owen Fund for ethno. fieldwork
    • AFC invites applications: Blanton Owen Fund for ethno. fieldwork (77 lines)
      From: Stephanie Aileen Hall <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:36:04 -0500

13. Archival media?
    • Archival media? (20 lines)
      From: Language Archives <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:44:18 -0600
    • Re: Archival media? (43 lines)
      From: Jerry L. Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 19:18:52 -0500

14. Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records
    • Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (83 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:44:23 -0500
    • Re: Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (116 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:22:56 -0600
    • Re: Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (31 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 00:45:10 -0500
    • Re: Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (39 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 00:46:45 -0500
    • Re: Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (43 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 01:22:38 -0600
    • Re: Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (25 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:30:15 -0500
    • Re: Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (25 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:46:39 -0800
    • Re: Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (84 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 23:56:30 +0100
    • Re: Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (63 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:20:46 -0600
    • Re: Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (123 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 01:21:29 +0100
    • Re: Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (24 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:48:09 -0500
    • Re: Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (47 lines)
      From: Rollin' Recording <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 18:41:31 -0600
    • Re: Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (41 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 02:12:03 +0100
    • Re: Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (26 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:44:34 -0600
    • Re: Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (50 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:24:03 -0600
    • Re: Audio compression on radio, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (28 lines)
      From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 21:51:45 -0600

15. AV Media Workshop Series
    • AV Media Workshop Series (189 lines)
      From: Ferguson, Kelly <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:52:09 -0500

16. Bernstein info needed
    • Bernstein info needed (20 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:56:50 -0500
    • Re: Bernstein info needed (38 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:13:34 -0800
    • Re: Bernstein info needed (48 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:25:14 -0500
    • Re: Bernstein info needed (49 lines)
      From: Stan Punzel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:41:02 -0800
    • Re: Bernstein info needed (70 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:07:19 -0500
    • Re: Bernstein info needed (68 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:33:48 -0800
    • Re: Bernstein info needed (23 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:48:10 -0800
    • Re: Bernstein info needed (35 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:31:47 -0500
    • Re: Bernstein info needed (21 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:49:41 -0800

17. Bobby Jones chanpionships, 1930
    • Bobby Jones chanpionships, 1930 (25 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:17:12 -0500
    • Re: Bobby Jones chanpionships, 1930 (44 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:18:05 -0500
    • Re: Bobby Jones chanpionships, 1930 (56 lines)
      From: vandiik <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:57:15 -0500

18. Brass recordings
    • Brass recordings (49 lines)
      From: Paul T. Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:01:38 -0800

19. Bugle Calls by Chief Trumpeter Cassi
    • Bugle Calls by Chief Trumpeter Cassi (16 lines)
      From: Bernd Wichert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 05:03:43 -0500
    • Re: Bugle Calls by Chief Trumpeter Cassi (33 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 09:12:30 -0500
    • Re: Bugle Calls by Chief Trumpeter Cassi (21 lines)
      From: Jack Raymond <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:06:35 -0500
    • Re: Bugle Calls by Chief Trumpeter Cassi (32 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:00:54 -0800

20. Carter Harman Obit
    • Carter Harman Obit (27 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:46:03 -0800

21. Classical record review media
    • Classical record review media (56 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:59:44 -0500
    • Re: Classical record review media (60 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:37:08 -0600
    • Re: Classical record review media (72 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:23:38 -0500
    • Re: Classical record review media (72 lines)
      From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:00:58 -0500
    • Re: Classical record review media (82 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:07:21 -0800
    • Re: Classical record review media (136 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:41:39 -0500
    • Re: Classical record review media (127 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:50:01 -0800
    • Re: Classical record review media (72 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:24:48 -0500

22. Classical Record Reviews II
    • Classical Record Reviews II (24 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:32:38 -0500

23. Classical Record Reviw Media III
    • Classical Record Reviw Media III (37 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:36:12 -0500
    • Re: Classical Record Reviw Media III (77 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:31:00 -0500

24. Classical recordings guide
    • Classical recordings guide (24 lines)
      From: Dr. Cheryl Thurber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:25:08 -0800
    • Re: Classical recordings guide (31 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:36:39 -0800
    • Re: Classical recordings guide (69 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:26:56 -0500
    • Re: Classical recordings guide (77 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:36:37 -0800
    • Re: Classical recordings guide (31 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:55:33 -0800
    • Re: Classical recordings guide (77 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:00:45 -0800
    • Re: Classical recordings guide (84 lines)
      From: D. Blake Werts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:41:16 -0500
    • Re: Classical recordings guide (39 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:35:08 -0500
    • Re: Classical recordings guide (53 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 21:10:53 -0800
    • Re: Classical recordings guide (25 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:22:58 -0500

25. Classicl Record Review Media. The List as of 1/12/07
    • Classicl Record Review Media. The List as of 1/12/07 (360 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:08:45 -0500
    • Re: Classicl Record Review Media. The List as of 1/12/07 (415 lines)
      From: Lynne Carmichael <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 08:11:52 +1100

26. Cleaning aluminum disks
    • Cleaning aluminum disks (28 lines)
      From: Language Archives <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:31:59 -0600
    • Re: Cleaning aluminum disks (61 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:30:31 -0600
    • Re: Cleaning aluminum disks (67 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:05:19 -0500
    • Re: Cleaning aluminum disks (37 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:43:03 -0500

27. Darlene Edwards (was: Rosemary Brown)
    • Darlene Edwards (was: Rosemary Brown) (154 lines)
      From: Mal Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:44:14 -1000
    • Re: Darlene Edwards (was: Rosemary Brown) (162 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:33:14 -0500

28. Digital Collections Librarian Position Announcement - University of Maryland
    • Digital Collections Librarian Position Announcement - University of Maryland (70 lines)
      From: Kate Murray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:41:08 -0500

29. Digital in a post-digital universe--was: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings
    • Re: Digital in a post-digital universe--was: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings (65 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:28:06 +0100
    • Re: Digital in a post-digital universe--was: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings (41 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:51:23 -0800
    • Re: Digital in a post-digital universe--was: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings (41 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:40:13 -0500

30. Digital in a post-digital universe--was: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings.
    • Digital in a post-digital universe--was: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (34 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:35:55 -0500
    • Re: Digital in a post-digital universe--was: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (58 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:06:10 -0600
    • Re: Digital in a post-digital universe--was: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (77 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:29:31 -0500
    • Re: Digital in a post-digital universe--was: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (87 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:38:53 -0600
    • Re: Digital in a post-digital universe--was: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (37 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:48:17 -0500
    • Re: Digital in a post-digital universe--was: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (34 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:24:56 +0000
    • Re: Digital in a post-digital universe--was: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (50 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:38:04 -0600
    • Re: Digital in a post-digital universe--was: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (31 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:39:23 -0800

31. Discsox
    • Discsox (32 lines)
      From: Martin Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:04:15 -0600

32. early CD bashing
    • early CD bashing (31 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:48:37 -0600
    • Re: early CD bashing (70 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 18:52:39 -0500
    • Re: early CD bashing (99 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 18:03:17 -0600
    • Re: early CD bashing (23 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:01:21 -0500
    • Re: early CD bashing (31 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:15:59 -0600
    • Re: early CD bashing (44 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:52:51 -0800
    • Re: early CD bashing (53 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:40:15 -0600
    • Re: early CD bashing (34 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:46:58 +0000
    • Re: early CD bashing (47 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:25:06 -0600
    • Re: early CD bashing (34 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:17:32 -0600
    • Re: early CD bashing (46 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:28:58 -0500
    • Re: early CD bashing (58 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:37:48 -0600
    • Re: early CD bashing (66 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:43:59 -0600
    • Re: early CD bashing (54 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:45:40 -0600
    • Re: early CD bashing (80 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:49:52 -0500
    • Re: early CD bashing (37 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:04:39 -0600
    • Re: early CD bashing (30 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:37:39 -0800

33. Edison factory fire
    • Edison factory fire (20 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:57:59 -0500
    • Re: Edison factory fire (31 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:50:10 -0800
    • Re: Edison factory fire (34 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:00:40 -0800
    • Re: Edison factory fire (39 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:09:37 -0500
    • Re: Edison factory fire (20 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:27:55 -0500
    • Re: Edison factory fire (48 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:02:10 -0500
    • Re: Edison factory fire (54 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:03:45 -0500
    • Re: Edison factory fire (83 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:47:16 -0500
    • Re: Edison factory fire (31 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:10:02 -0500
    • Re: Edison factory fire (67 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:42:36 -0600
    • Re: Edison factory fire (44 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:06:31 -0800
    • Re: Edison factory fire (55 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:59:47 -0800
    • Re: Edison factory fire (29 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:01:53 -0800
    • Re: Edison factory fire (66 lines)
      From: eugene hayhoe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:05:49 -0800
    • Re: Edison factory fire (44 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:06:25 -0800

34. Edison factory fire ^
    • Re: Edison factory fire ^ (42 lines)
      From: eugene hayhoe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 06:13:46 -0800
    • Re: Edison factory fire ^ (19 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:34:48 EST
    • Re: Edison factory fire ^ (58 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:24:48 -0800
    • Re: Edison factory fire ^ (71 lines)
      From: eugene hayhoe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:50:27 -0800
    • Re: Edison factory fire ^ (29 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:56:11 -0800

35. Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions?
    • Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (38 lines)
      From: andy kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:12:08 -0500
    • Re: Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (40 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:03:16 -0800
    • Re: Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:25:21 -0800
    • Re: Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (39 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:42:59 -0500
    • Re: Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (32 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:27:10 +0000
    • Re: Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (51 lines)
      From: Jerry L. Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:08:41 -0500
    • Re: Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (35 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:34:15 +0000

36. Ford recorded on rare Edison phonograph
    • Ford recorded on rare Edison phonograph (35 lines)
      From: George Strawley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:31:13 -0500

37. Fwd: [ARSCBOARD] Posting on ARSC List re: ARSC AWards for Excellence
    • Fwd: [ARSCBOARD] Posting on ARSC List re: ARSC AWards for Excellence (140 lines)
      From: Tim Brooks <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:05:36 EST
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCBOARD] Posting on ARSC List re: ARSC AWards for Excellence (92 lines)
      From: Mal Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:59:17 -1000

38. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dating LPs ?:Silvertone Records/Milstein
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dating LPs ?:Silvertone Records/Milstein (112 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 19:30:46 EST
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dating LPs ?:Silvertone Records/Milstein (30 lines)
      From: Russell W. Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:38:41 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dating LPs ?:Silvertone Records/Milstein (121 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 00:07:46 -0500

39. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Period Records
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Period Records (156 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:42:21 EST

40. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Period Records
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Period Records (81 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:55:57 EST
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Period Records (128 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:43:00 -0500

41. help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines
    • help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (29 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:03:42 -0600
    • Re: help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (63 lines)
      From: Tape Archive <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:38:32 -0800
    • Re: help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (50 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:06:18 -0600
    • Re: help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (81 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:55:57 -0500
    • Re: help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (19 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:12:26 -0500
    • Re: help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (110 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:09:56 -0500
    • Re: help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (93 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:12:47 -0600
    • Re: help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (29 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:48:26 -0500
    • Re: help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (34 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:06:58 -0500
    • Re: help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (96 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:09:11 -0500
    • Re: help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (50 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:19:29 -0500
    • Re: help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (134 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:20:15 -0600
    • Re: help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (165 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:32:37 -0600
    • Re: help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (33 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:15:37 -0800
    • Re: help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (55 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:46:55 -0500

42. how does someone being this type of work.
    • Re: how does someone being this type of work. (52 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:40:52 -0500
    • Re: how does someone being this type of work. (66 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:08:08 +0100
    • Re: how does someone being this type of work. (95 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:06:23 -0500

43. Inez Matthews Schwanengesang
    • Inez Matthews Schwanengesang (18 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:45:25 -0500

44. Interesting Economist piece
    • Interesting Economist piece (115 lines)
      From: Mal Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 18:10:29 -1000
    • Re: Interesting Economist piece (24 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:51:12 -0500
    • Re: Interesting Economist piece (38 lines)
      From: Mal Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:33:13 -1000

45. Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings.
    • Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (171 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:01:09 EST
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (185 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:21:51 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (249 lines)
      From: Miss Q <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:48:14 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (204 lines)
      From: Morris Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:35:32 -0600
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (31 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:38:36 +0000
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (156 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 18:21:00 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (43 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 18:27:58 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (99 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 21:06:43 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (247 lines)
      From: vandiik <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 22:33:30 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (231 lines)
      From: Jack Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 00:26:39 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (66 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 00:35:41 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (77 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 23:34:45 -0800
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (65 lines)
      From: Miriam Meislik <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 08:44:32 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (29 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 07:20:43 -0800
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (149 lines)
      From: Kiwi O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:16:33 -0800
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (139 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:42:50 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (151 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 18:06:49 -0800
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (168 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 21:52:43 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (54 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:19:00 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (26 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 06:21:35 -0800
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (26 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 07:10:12 -0800
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (36 lines)
      From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:38:39 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (38 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:43:17 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (31 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:12:37 -0800
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (120 lines)
      From: Kiwi O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 10:33:59 -0800
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (81 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:20:26 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (39 lines)
      From: D. Blake Werts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:16:26 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (56 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:49:42 +0100
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (58 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:53:04 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (36 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 20:01:48 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (67 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:47:54 -0800
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (65 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 00:16:54 +0000
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (43 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 00:23:10 +0000
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (32 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:56:28 +0000
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (47 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:44:22 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (64 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 11:59:09 -0600
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (37 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 10:54:13 -0800
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (28 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:04:54 +0000
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (33 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 17:03:55 -0600
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (43 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:57:08 -0600
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (34 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:08:32 -0500
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (44 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:14:42 +0000
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (31 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 08:21:28 -0800
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (60 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:33:39 -0600
    • Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (28 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:21:10 -0500

46. It Goes To 11...The Spinal Tap Philosophy.
    • Re: It Goes To 11...The Spinal Tap Philosophy. (174 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 20:47:47 -0500
    • Re: It Goes To 11...The Spinal Tap Philosophy. (173 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:12:45 -0500
    • Re: It Goes To 11...The Spinal Tap Philosophy. (251 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:28:11 -0600
    • Re: It Goes To 11...The Spinal Tap Philosophy. (229 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:43:17 -0500
    • Re: It Goes To 11...The Spinal Tap Philosophy. (201 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 00:24:58 -0500
    • Re: It Goes To 11...The Spinal Tap Philosophy. (29 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 00:37:57 -0500
    • Re: It Goes To 11...The Spinal Tap Philosophy. (50 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:34:10 -0500

47. Jack Benny
    • Jack Benny (13 lines)
      From: luisa miranda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:20:30 -0800
    • Re: Jack Benny (25 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:10:36 -0500
    • Re: Jack Benny (38 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:39:20 EST
    • Re: Jack Benny (62 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:03:48 -0800

48. January issue of Black Grooves
    • January issue of Black Grooves (59 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:05:06 -0500

49. Japanese Festival Music
    • Japanese Festival Music (18 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:00:51 -0800
    • Re: Japanese Festival Music (36 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:53:50 -0800
    • Re: Japanese Festival Music (21 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 09:14:16 -0800

50. Job Openings and Internships
    • Job Openings and Internships (63 lines)
      From: George Blood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:19:43 -0500

51. laserdisc (Peter Cooke & Dudley Moore)
    • Re: laserdisc (Peter Cooke & Dudley Moore) (50 lines)
      From: Matthew Barton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:36:36 -0500

52. Lathe Cut Record Experiment
    • Lathe Cut Record Experiment (24 lines)
      From: Miss Q <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:22:12 -0500
    • Re: Lathe Cut Record Experiment (39 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:28:53 -0800
    • Re: Lathe Cut Record Experiment (29 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:29:42 -0800
    • Re: Lathe Cut Record Experiment (62 lines)
      From: Miss Q <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:36:26 -0500
    • Re: Lathe Cut Record Experiment (30 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:45:18 -0800
    • Re: Lathe Cut Record Experiment (55 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:15:17 -0500
    • Re: Lathe Cut Record Experiment (49 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:55:28 -0600
    • Re: Lathe Cut Record Experiment (55 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:53:24 -0500
    • Re: Lathe Cut Record Experiment (69 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:16:17 -0800

53. Libraries
    • Re: Libraries (37 lines)
      From: eugene hayhoe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 07:44:54 -0800
    • Re: Libraries (78 lines)
      From: David Hamiton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:36:13 -0500
    • Re: Libraries (91 lines)
      From: eugene hayhoe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 09:45:40 -0800

54. Libraries disposing of records
    • Libraries disposing of records (52 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:25:28 EST
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (44 lines)
      From: D. Blake Werts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:22:40 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (56 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:37:56 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (15 lines)
      From: Bernd Wichert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 22:48:40 +0100
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (32 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:58:31 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (41 lines)
      From: Bernd Wichert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:05:28 +0100
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (46 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:16:11 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (58 lines)
      From: Bernd Wichert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:24:21 +0100
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (53 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:27:27 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (71 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:32:33 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (82 lines)
      From: D. Blake Werts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:58:55 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (61 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:06:45 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (94 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:19:15 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (27 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 19:42:09 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (66 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 20:20:41 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (118 lines)
      From: D. Blake Werts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 20:13:33 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (160 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:31:41 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (98 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:37:42 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (164 lines)
      From: Paul Tyler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:50:34 -0800
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (228 lines)
      From: D. Blake Werts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 22:08:59 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (70 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:21:37 -0600
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (60 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:22:26 -0600
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (105 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 22:31:32 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (86 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 22:57:32 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (35 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:10:26 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (115 lines)
      From: Miss Q <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:09:01 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (61 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 22:17:06 -0600
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (122 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 22:20:06 -0600
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (32 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 20:43:03 -0800
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (43 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:50:51 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (97 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 00:08:35 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (26 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:09:59 -0800
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (71 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:32:36 -0800
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (61 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:33:38 -0800
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (79 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:34:26 -0800
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (56 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 22:02:57 -0800
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (181 lines)
      From: Miss Q <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 02:58:15 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (123 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 07:47:51 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (74 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 07:53:09 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (210 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 08:49:47 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (105 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 11:08:03 -0600
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (107 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:24:27 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (84 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 11:30:22 -0600
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (121 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:16:15 -0800
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (238 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 14:34:18 -0600
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (66 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 15:53:49 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (25 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:00:16 -0800
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (131 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:12:11 -0800
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (83 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 16:51:40 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (182 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 17:01:57 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (28 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 16:29:27 -0600
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (49 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 18:46:50 +0000
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (53 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 18:51:59 +0000
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (45 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 18:02:47 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (86 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 17:06:40 -0600
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (55 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 17:44:01 -0600
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (62 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:04:49 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (99 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:20:33 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (87 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:56:23 -0600
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (31 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:11:14 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (30 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 18:22:51 -0800
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (91 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:44:48 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (67 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:03:33 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (46 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:23:32 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (68 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:24:24 -0600
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (37 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 23:06:13 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (82 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 23:01:20 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (24 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 23:09:13 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (56 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 23:01:42 -0600
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (22 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 00:29:19 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (110 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 23:23:02 -0600
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (41 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:40:42 -0800
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (32 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 01:23:48 -0600
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (50 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 23:40:48 +0000
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (34 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:10:53 -0800
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (22 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:25:43 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (24 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:36:02 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (71 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:07:16 -0500
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (33 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:33:39 -0800
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (42 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:40:58 +0000
    • Re: Libraries disposing of records (54 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:41:11 -0600

55. Looking for Recordings of Agricultural Weather Reports
    • Looking for Recordings of Agricultural Weather Reports (47 lines)
      From: George, Stephanie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:06:01 -0800
    • Re: Looking for Recordings of Agricultural Weather Reports (66 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:07:37 -0500
    • Re: Looking for Recordings of Agricultural Weather Reports (38 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:56:42 -0800
    • Re: Looking for Recordings of Agricultural Weather Reports (49 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:53:52 -0800
    • Re: Looking for Recordings of Agricultural Weather Reports (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:38:44 EST

56. Loudness, was Libraries disposing of records
    • Loudness, was Libraries disposing of records (66 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:42:21 -0600
    • Re: Loudness, was Libraries disposing of records (83 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 20:02:33 -0600
    • Re: Loudness, was Libraries disposing of records (96 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 07:53:43 -0600
    • Re: Loudness, was Libraries disposing of records (146 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:17:35 -0600

57. Microcassettes
    • Microcassettes (58 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:46:27 -0500
    • Re: Microcassettes (73 lines)
      From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:11:43 -0500
    • Re: Microcassettes (70 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:36:03 -0500
    • Re: Microcassettes (101 lines)
      From: Susan Stinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:53:15 -0500
    • Re: Microcassettes (97 lines)
      From: Roderic G Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:54:17 -0800
    • Re: Microcassettes (118 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:03:47 -0500
    • Re: Microcassettes (128 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:03:26 +0100
    • Re: Microcassettes (77 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:39:03 -0500
    • Re: Microcassettes (138 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:42:26 -0500
    • Re: Microcassettes (27 lines)
      From: David Dintenfass <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:29:45 -0800
    • Re: Microcassettes (189 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:36:57 -0500
    • Re: Microcassettes (33 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:05:57 -0800
    • Re: Microcassettes (45 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:54:03 -0600

58. Missing discography
    • Missing discography (19 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:46:44 -0500
    • Re: Missing discography (26 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:30:44 -0500
    • Re: Missing discography (34 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:22:50 -0800

59. Money--was: Libraries disposing of records
    • Money--was: Libraries disposing of records (25 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 19:48:48 -0500

60. Multi format DVD/CD/SACD, etc Player
    • Re: Multi format DVD/CD/SACD, etc Player (45 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:59:31 -0500
    • Re: Multi format DVD/CD/SACD, etc Player (38 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:14:21 -0800
    • Re: Multi format DVD/CD/SACD, etc Player (45 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:10:37 -0500
    • Re: Multi format DVD/CD/SACD, etc Player (28 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:16:48 -0800
    • Re: Multi format DVD/CD/SACD, etc Player (52 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:19:52 -0500
    • Re: Multi format DVD/CD/SACD, etc Player (64 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:55:05 -0800
    • Re: Multi format DVD/CD/SACD, etc Player (43 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:13:55 -0500
    • Re: Multi format DVD/CD/SACD, etc Player (26 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:06:55 EST
    • Re: Multi format DVD/CD/SACD, etc Player (31 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:23:20 -0800
    • Re: Multi format DVD/CD/SACD, etc Player (42 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:44:04 -0800
    • Re: Multi format DVD/CD/SACD, etc Player (54 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:44:16 -0500
    • Re: Multi format DVD/CD/SACD, etc Player (78 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:24:51 -0500
    • Re: Multi format DVD/CD/SACD, etc Player (35 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:00:08 -0500
    • Re: Multi format DVD/CD/SACD, etc Player (87 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:13:37 -0500

61. NARAS Journal
    • NARAS Journal (20 lines)
      From: Jerry McBride <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:34:39 -0800
    • Re: NARAS Journal (40 lines)
      From: Louise Spear <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:11:44 -0800
    • Re: NARAS Journal (67 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:16:57 -0500
    • Re: NARAS Journal (23 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:34:07 -0500

62. New eBay listings
    • New eBay listings (33 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:50:26 -0500

63. Nominations for the 2007 ARSC Awards for Excellence
    • Nominations for the 2007 ARSC Awards for Excellence (57 lines)
      From: Joel Bresler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:00:32 -0500
    • Re: Nominations for the 2007 ARSC Awards for Excellence (91 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:34:34 -0500
    • Re: Nominations for the 2007 ARSC Awards for Excellence (110 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:59:13 -0800

64. Note: *Windows* Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions?]
    • Note: *Windows* Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions?] (66 lines)
      From: andy kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:19:11 -0500

65. Of interest?
    • Of interest? (16 lines)
      From: Mark Durenberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:50:08 -0600

66. Paper leader tape
    • Paper leader tape (28 lines)
      From: John Bondurant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:31:20 -0500
    • Re: Paper leader tape (31 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:38:44 -0500
    • Re: Paper leader tape (25 lines)
      From: Ed Falk <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:46:33 -0800
    • Re: Paper leader tape (42 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:59:36 -0500
    • Re: Paper leader tape (62 lines)
      From: Kiwi O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:45:35 -0800
    • Re: Paper leader tape (24 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:16:56 -0500
    • Re: Paper leader tape (34 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:47:35 -0600
    • Re: Paper leader tape (26 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:40:00 -0800
    • Re: Paper leader tape (24 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:41:27 -0800
    • Re: Paper leader tape (61 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:10:01 -0500
    • Re: Paper leader tape (97 lines)
      From: Susan Stinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:11:40 -0500
    • Re: Paper leader tape (118 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:44:51 -0500

67. Paper Leader Tape
    • Re: Paper Leader Tape (81 lines)
      From: John Bondurant <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:47:12 -0500

68. Period Records
    • Period Records (26 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:04 -0500
    • Re: Period Records (44 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:13:41 -0500
    • Re: Period Records (19 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:23:45 -0500

69. Reactions to the Record Symposium
    • Reactions to the Record Symposium (22 lines)
      From: Jerry McBride <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:58:55 -0800

70. Record auction closing soon
    • Record auction closing soon (29 lines)
      From: Hawthorn's Antique Audio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:32:34 -0800

71. reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines
    • Re: reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (76 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:32:36 -0500
    • Re: reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (94 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:35:31 -0500
    • Re: reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (121 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:11:29 -0500
    • Re: reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (49 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:44:41 -0500
    • Re: reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (55 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:32:11 -0500
    • Re: reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (180 lines)
      From: Wasserman, Robert A - WHS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:54:47 -0600

72. Reminder deadline TAPE workshop management of audiovisual collections, Amsterdam, 18-24 April 2007
    • Reminder deadline TAPE workshop management of audiovisual collections, Amsterdam, 18-24 April 2007 (67 lines)
      From: Ecpa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:25:16 +0100

73. Reminder: ARSC Conference Travel Grants
    • Reminder: ARSC Conference Travel Grants (34 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:54:46 -0500

74. Reminder: ARSC Research Grants Program
    • Reminder: ARSC Research Grants Program (66 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:07:58 -0500

75. Reminder: Nominations for the 2007 ARSC Awards for Excellence
    • Reminder: Nominations for the 2007 ARSC Awards for Excellence (100 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:58:03 -0500
    • Re: Reminder: Nominations for the 2007 ARSC Awards for Excellence (110 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:41:06 -0800

76. Reminder: Written Comments Sought for Rec Sd Preservation Study
    • Reminder: Written Comments Sought for Rec Sd Preservation Study (78 lines)
      From: Stephen C Leggett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:42:43 -0500

77. Reminder: Written Comments Sought for Rec Sd Preservation Study, add-on Canadian project
    • Re: Reminder: Written Comments Sought for Rec Sd Preservation Study, add-on Canadian project (137 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:12:52 -0500

78. Reply to: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Period Records
    • Reply to: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Period Records (36 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:39:12 -0500
    • Re: Reply to: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Period Records (42 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:49:04 -0500

79. Richard Nanes
    • Richard Nanes (19 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:45:06 -0800
    • Re: Richard Nanes (42 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:10:40 -0500
    • Re: Richard Nanes (26 lines)
      From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:17:06 -0500
    • Re: Richard Nanes (51 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:33:36 -0800
    • Re: Richard Nanes (43 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:14:31 -0500
    • Re: Richard Nanes (92 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:45:19 -0500
    • Re: Richard Nanes (78 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:21:28 -0500
    • Re: Richard Nanes (88 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:32:07 -0800
    • Re: Richard Nanes (22 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:02:35 -0500

80. Rosemary Brown
    • Rosemary Brown (53 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:49:47 -0800
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (46 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:30:51 +0100
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (42 lines)
      From: Mary Huismann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:31:46 -0600
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (217 lines)
      From: Lynne Carmichael <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:14:01 +1100
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (85 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:32:44 -0500
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (18 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:45:51 -0800
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (43 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:11:35 -0500
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (74 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:34:19 -0500
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (23 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:41:39 -0800
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (54 lines)
      From: Mark Durenberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:52:31 -0600
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (59 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:15:36 -0800
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (74 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:20:43 -0500
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (38 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:01:33 -0500
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (81 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:03:02 -0500
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (65 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:17:12 -0500
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (91 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:20:48 -0500
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (70 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:28:32 -0500
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (72 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:54:33 -0600
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (80 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:26 -0500
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (23 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:07:26 EST
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (35 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:30:01 -0500
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (26 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:12:25 EST
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (36 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:42:37 -0500
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (50 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:20:05 -0500
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (44 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:21:08 -0500
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (44 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:51:13 -0500
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (79 lines)
      From: Bill Schurk <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:37:25 -0800
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (90 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:02:08 -0500
    • Re: Rosemary Brown (43 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:32:21 +0000

81. Setting a value on tape collections
    • Setting a value on tape collections (33 lines)
      From: Alec McLane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:15:29 -0500
    • Re: Setting a value on tape collections (63 lines)
      From: andy kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:46:44 -0500

82. SF Tape Music Festival
    • SF Tape Music Festival (56 lines)
      From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:40:59 -0800

83. Shostakovich, was Re: [ARSCLIST] early CD bashing
    • Shostakovich, was Re: [ARSCLIST] early CD bashing (25 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:05:35 -0500
    • Re: Shostakovich, was Re: [ARSCLIST] early CD bashing (33 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:38:32 -0800
    • Re: Shostakovich, was Re: [ARSCLIST] early CD bashing (42 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:48:02 -0500
    • Re: Shostakovich, was Re: [ARSCLIST] early CD bashing (42 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:51:56 -0600
    • Re: Shostakovich, was Re: [ARSCLIST] early CD bashing (52 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:43:44 -0500
    • Re: Shostakovich, was Re: [ARSCLIST] early CD bashing (49 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:37:43 -0800
    • Re: Shostakovich, was Re: [ARSCLIST] early CD bashing (59 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:00:03 -0800
    • Re: Shostakovich, was Re: [ARSCLIST] early CD bashing (19 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:10:31 -0800
    • Re: Shostakovich, was Re: [ARSCLIST] early CD bashing (88 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:08:16 -0500
    • Re: Shostakovich, was Re: [ARSCLIST] early CD bashing (19 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:10:07 -0800
    • Re: Shostakovich, was Re: [ARSCLIST] early CD bashing (34 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:11:19 -0500
    • Re: Shostakovich, was Re: [ARSCLIST] early CD bashing (47 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:33:15 -0800
    • Re: Shostakovich, was Re: [ARSCLIST] early CD bashing (59 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:16:05 -0500
    • Re: Shostakovich, was Re: [ARSCLIST] early CD bashing (27 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:30:34 -0500

84. significant collection of discographies for sale
    • significant collection of discographies for sale (48 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:07:07 -0800
    • Re: significant collection of discographies for sale (26 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:18:11 -0500
    • Re: significant collection of discographies for sale (33 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:16:27 -0500

85. Soundcard/iTunes phollies
    • Soundcard/iTunes phollies (32 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:45:57 -0500
    • Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies (69 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:41:41 -0800
    • Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies (100 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:49:44 -0500
    • Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies (46 lines)
      From: Dave Nolan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:34:23 -0500
    • Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies (26 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:39:29 -0500
    • Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies (50 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:41:10 -0600
    • Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies (49 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:41:59 -0600
    • Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies (64 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:08:54 -0500
    • Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies (31 lines)
      From: Dave Nolan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:23:32 -0500
    • Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies (120 lines)
      From: Dave Nolan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:21:20 -0500
    • Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies (134 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:15:47 -0500
    • Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies (43 lines)
      From: Peter Rothstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:22:12 -0500
    • Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies (154 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:49:33 -0500
    • Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies (65 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:55:41 -0500
    • Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies (52 lines)
      From: Konrad Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:58:18 -0500
    • Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies (64 lines)
      From: Peter Rothstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 00:43:02 -0500
    • Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies (48 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 10:29:05 -0500

86. square waves....Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records
    • square waves....Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (52 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 01:08:09 -0600
    • Re: square waves....Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (87 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 01:42:21 -0600
    • Re: square waves....Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (102 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:37:27 -0500
    • Re: square waves....Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (117 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:42:57 -0600
    • Re: square waves....Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (34 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:22:46 -0500
    • Re: square waves....Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (74 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 01:46:51 +0100
    • Re: square waves....Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (32 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 18:19:57 -0800
    • Re: square waves....Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (46 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:29:54 -0600
    • Re: square waves....Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (31 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:13:12 -0800
    • Re: square waves....Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (32 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 00:22:31 -0600
    • Re: square waves....Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records (28 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:07:08 -0500

87. sticky shed questions
    • sticky shed questions (30 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:53:37 -0600
    • Re: sticky shed questions (49 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:22:48 -0500
    • Re: sticky shed questions (73 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:22:30 -0500
    • Re: sticky shed questions (46 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:28:10 -0500
    • Re: sticky shed questions (70 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:14:49 -0600
    • Re: sticky shed questions (88 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 03:15:00 -0600

88. Strauss Japanese Festival Music
    • Strauss Japanese Festival Music (22 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:03:01 -0800
    • Re: Strauss Japanese Festival Music (51 lines)
      From: Peter Rothstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:38:32 -0500
    • Re: Strauss Japanese Festival Music (38 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:32:29 -0800
    • Re: Strauss Japanese Festival Music (60 lines)
      From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:04:56 -0500
    • Re: Strauss Japanese Festival Music (81 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:40:17 -0800

89. Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them
    • Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (19 lines)
      From: Jon Noring <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:41:24 -0700
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (36 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 02:18:42 +0100
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (61 lines)
      From: Michael Biel [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 21:01:07 -0500
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (40 lines)
      From: Jon Noring <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:36:52 -0700
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (18 lines)
      From: Ed Falk <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:51:45 -0800
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (33 lines)
      From: Mal Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 18:06:33 -1000
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (36 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 08:48:06 +0100
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (38 lines)
      From: Jon Noring <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:50:28 -0700
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (51 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:36:31 -0800
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (72 lines)
      From: Prentice, Will <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:56:09 -0000
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (46 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:13:55 +0100
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (43 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:32:00 EST
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (34 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:10:50 -0800
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (30 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:23:44 EST
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (30 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:24:10 EST
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (19 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:20:48 -0500
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (58 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:07:35 -0800
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (28 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:44:25 -0800
    • Re: Strips of plastic play audio when you run your teeth over them (26 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:45:39 -0800

90. Studer B67
    • Studer B67 (24 lines)
      From: Farrington, Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:20:30 -0500

91. Tape transport delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines
    • Tape transport delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (93 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:29:11 -0600

92. Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines
    • Re: Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (67 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:01:25 -0500
    • Re: Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (32 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:05:16 -0500
    • Re: Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (44 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:42:25 -0500
    • Re: Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (89 lines)
      From: Tape Archive <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:00:02 -0800
    • Re: Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (49 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:37:45 -0500
    • Re: Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (59 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:24:01 -0600
    • Re: Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (74 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:40:35 -0600
    • Re: Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (83 lines)
      From: Kiwi O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:00:12 -0800
    • Re: Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (100 lines)
      From: Steve Puntolillo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:31:50 -0500
    • Re: Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (55 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:03:13 -0500
    • Re: Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (70 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:14:37 -0600
    • Re: Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (80 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:44:00 -0600
    • Re: Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (108 lines)
      From: Steve Puntolillo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:45:50 -0500
    • Re: Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (173 lines)
      From: Kiwi O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:52:57 -0800
    • Re: Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (180 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:48:14 -0500
    • Re: Tape transport gentleness was delicacy WAS reel choices was help in fair pricing of reel to reel machines (265 lines)
      From: Steve Puntolillo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 02:48:48 -0500

93. Technical committee. Ipod, etc.
    • Technical committee. Ipod, etc. (28 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:57:27 -0500
    • Re: Technical committee. Ipod, etc. (47 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:15:14 -0500

94. Thanks! Was: *Windows* Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions?
    • Thanks! Was: *Windows* Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (41 lines)
      From: andy kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:12:35 -0500
    • Re: Thanks! Was: *Windows* Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (34 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:44:21 -0800
    • Re: Thanks! Was: *Windows* Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (60 lines)
      From: Melanie Grogan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:56:58 +1100
    • Re: Thanks! Was: *Windows* Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (40 lines)
      From: Graeme Jaye <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:13:35 +0100
    • Re: Thanks! Was: *Windows* Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (59 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:55:32 -0500
    • Re: Thanks! Was: *Windows* Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (40 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:21:35 -0500
    • Re: Thanks! Was: *Windows* Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (84 lines)
      From: Jerry Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:02:45 -0500
    • Re: Thanks! Was: *Windows* Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (85 lines)
      From: Paul T. Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:14:40 -0800
    • Re: Thanks! Was: *Windows* Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (54 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:24:28 -0500
    • Re: Thanks! Was: *Windows* Floppy Disc Blues--aka data recovery software suggestions? (29 lines)
      From: Andy Kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:30:30 -0500

95. The Time has come......
    • The Time has come...... (42 lines)
      From: Kiwi O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:39:22 -0800
    • Re: The Time has come...... (29 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:09:22 -0500
    • Re: The Time has come...... (52 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:36:35 -0500
    • Re: The Time has come...... (33 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:43:06 -0500
    • Re: The Time has come...... (53 lines)
      From: Kiwi O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:12:57 -0800
    • Re: The Time has come...... (39 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:54:09 -0500
    • Re: The Time has come...... (79 lines)
      From: Kiwi O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:56:21 -0800
    • Re: The Time has come...... (28 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:57:34 -0500
    • Re: The Time has come...... (31 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:09:34 -0500
    • Re: The Time has come...... (58 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:04:48 -0500
    • Re: The Time has come...... (66 lines)
      From: Kiwi O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:18:20 -0800
    • Re: The Time has come...... (45 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:19:13 -0500

96. Toscanini presentation by Seth B. Winner at NYPL (fwd)
    • Toscanini presentation by Seth B. Winner at NYPL (fwd) (82 lines)
      From: Bob Kosovsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:03:14 -0500
    • Re: Toscanini presentation by Seth B. Winner at NYPL (fwd) (95 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:15:17 -0800
    • Re: Toscanini presentation by Seth B. Winner at NYPL (fwd) (112 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:59:02 -0600
    • Re: Toscanini presentation by Seth B. Winner at NYPL (fwd) (141 lines)
      From: Steve Abrams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:16:37 -0000
    • Re: Toscanini presentation by Seth B. Winner at NYPL (fwd) (62 lines)
      From: Aaron Z Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:08:17 -0500
    • Re: Toscanini presentation by Seth B. Winner at NYPL (fwd) (88 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:14:45 -0500

97. Tower Records
    • Tower Records (27 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 13:47:43 -0500
    • Re: Tower Records (44 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 14:41:07 EST
    • Re: Tower Records (65 lines)
      From: Jack Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 21:56:52 -0500
    • Re: Tower Records (62 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 08:03:12 -0500
    • Re: Tower Records (80 lines)
      From: eugene hayhoe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 05:04:27 -0800
    • Re: Tower Records (30 lines)
      From: Jack Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 21:05:41 -0500

98. Welcome to the XXI Jahrhundert...?!
    • Welcome to the XXI Jahrhundert...?! (26 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:21:07 -0500
    • Re: Welcome to the XXI Jahrhundert...?! (42 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:17:42 -0800

99. Whole Note Piece on James Brown
    • Whole Note Piece on James Brown (37 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 15:42:31 -0500
    • Re: Whole Note Piece on James Brown (53 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 15:00:40 -0600
    • Re: Whole Note Piece on James Brown (83 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:26:08 -0500

100. winter arsc newsletter deadline
     • winter arsc newsletter deadline (29 lines)
       From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:59:40 -0800

101. Wired: One Giant Screwup for Mankind
     • Wired: One Giant Screwup for Mankind (34 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:17:57 -0500
     • Re: Wired: One Giant Screwup for Mankind (50 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:11:07 -0500
     • Re: Wired: One Giant Screwup for Mankind (84 lines)
       From: Jim Lindner <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:46:47 -0500
     • Re: Wired: One Giant Screwup for Mankind (118 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:03:46 -0500
     • Re: Wired: One Giant Screwup for Mankind (155 lines)
       From: Jim Lindner <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:02:39 -0500

102. Workshop: Introduction to Digital Audio
     • Workshop: Introduction to Digital Audio (65 lines)
       From: Jonathan Wise <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:25:39 -0500

103. Yo' pod
     • Yo' pod (54 lines)
       From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:20:58 -0500
     • Re: Yo' pod (26 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:26:39 -0500
     • Re: Yo' pod (36 lines)
       From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:32:31 +0100

104. ^ Digital in a post-digital universe--was: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings.
     • Re: ^ Digital in a post-digital universe--was: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings. (22 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:15:51 -0500

105. ^ Paper Leader Tape
     • Re: ^ Paper Leader Tape (24 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:36:55 -0500
     • Re: ^ Paper Leader Tape (33 lines)
       From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:39:46 -0500
     • Re: ^ Paper Leader Tape (42 lines)
       From: eugene hayhoe <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:21:52 -0800