ARSCLIST Archives – October 2006

1. (Fwd) Stinson Calypso LPs
   • (Fwd) Stinson Calypso LPs (54 lines)
     From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:51:49 +0200
   • Re: (Fwd) Stinson Calypso LPs (70 lines)
     From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:23:29 -0400
   • Re: (Fwd) Stinson Calypso LPs (117 lines)
     From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:57:41 +0200
   • Re: (Fwd) Stinson Calypso LPs (122 lines)
     From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:28:27 -0400
   • Re: (Fwd) Stinson Calypso LPs (97 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:05:53 -0700

2. (non)-music:--was Early stereo mass market tapes
   • (non)-music:--was Early stereo mass market tapes (34 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:01:40 -0400

3. 78 collection for trade (Philadelphia)
   • Re: 78 collection for trade (Philadelphia) (34 lines)
     From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 13:22:03 -0400

4. A new definition of "multi-track"--was: Grundig EQ
   • A new definition of "multi-track"--was: Grundig EQ (28 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:15:37 -0400

5. A reply to: Are we at the end of the road musically??
   • A reply to: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (150 lines)
     From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 23:57:43 -0400

6. Acetate tape discolours tape box
   • Acetate tape discolours tape box (21 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:50:13 -0400
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (49 lines)
     From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:39:17 -0400
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (40 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:21:59 EDT
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (59 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:41:10 -0400
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (98 lines)
     From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:08:45 -0400
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (35 lines)
     From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:47:41 -0500
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (100 lines)
     From: Bev Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:45:44 -0230
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (70 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:46:01 -0400
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (128 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:52:36 -0400
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (99 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:24:37 -0400
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (107 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:37:11 -0400
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (145 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:20:57 -0400
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (76 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:38:29 EDT
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (47 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:06:02 -0400
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (209 lines)
     From: Bev Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:09:58 -0230
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (99 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:17:33 -0400
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (29 lines)
     From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:30:01 -0700
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (49 lines)
     From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:37:55 -0700
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (128 lines)
     From: Bev Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:48:17 -0230
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (52 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:40:12 -0400
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (83 lines)
     From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:22:12 +0200
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (46 lines)
     From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:33:50 +0200
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (75 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:07:31 -0400
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (38 lines)
     From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:25:15 -0700
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (50 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:55:33 -0400
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (66 lines)
     From: Bev Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:49:27 -0230
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (27 lines)
     From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:51:44 -0700
   • Re: Acetate tape discolours tape box (37 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:51:10 -0400

7. Alaskan Audio collection on eBay
   • Alaskan Audio collection on eBay (20 lines)
     From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:49:24 -0800
   • Re: Alaskan Audio collection on eBay (43 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:33:46 -0800
   • Re: Alaskan Audio collection on eBay (53 lines)
     From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:49:34 -0500
   • Re: Alaskan Audio collection on eBay (60 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:29:23 -0500
   • Re: Alaskan Audio collection on eBay (65 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:43:03 -0500
   • Re: Alaskan Audio collection on eBay (93 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:31:54 -0800
   • Re: Alaskan Audio collection on eBay (29 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:14:11 -0500
   • Re: Alaskan Audio collection on eBay (70 lines)
     From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:29:15 -0800

8. Another chime in the deathknell for CD's?
   • Another chime in the deathknell for CD's? (23 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 19:15:18 -0400
   • Re: Another chime in the deathknell for CD's? (47 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:55:20 +0000
   • Re: Another chime in the deathknell for CD's? (45 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:43:32 -0500
   • Re: Another chime in the deathknell for CD's? (37 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:09:56 +0000
   • Re: Another chime in the deathknell for CD's? (47 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:05:40 -0500
   • Re: Another chime in the deathknell for CD's? (37 lines)
     From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:17:50 -0500

9. Anti-skating (was Mostly for laughs)
   • Re: Anti-skating (was Mostly for laughs) (59 lines)
     From: Jos Van Dyck <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:59:02 -0400
   • Re: Anti-skating (was Mostly for laughs) (72 lines)
     From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:48:50 -0500

10. Antiskate important (was Mostly for laughs)
    • Antiskate important (was Mostly for laughs) (57 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:43:00 -0700

11. Are we at the end of the road musically??
    • Are we at the end of the road musically?? (151 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:32:20 -0700
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (131 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 19:22:31 -0400
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (171 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:30:49 -0400
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (26 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:39:22 -0400
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (44 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:56:37 -0500
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (451 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:03:25 -0700
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (42 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:35:04 -0400
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (60 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:01:31 -0700
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (33 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 00:12:51 -0400
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (41 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 12:02:58 EDT
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (25 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:21:07 -0400
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (68 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:56:28 -0400
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (60 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 14:03:27 +0000
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (26 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 11:15:46 -0400
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (41 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 14:19:57 +0000
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (52 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 15:08:15 -0700
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (80 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 17:22:11 -0500
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (98 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 19:58:09 -0400
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (91 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 22:41:40 -0400

12. Are we at the end of the road musically??Book
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically??Book (30 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 07:55:36 +0200
    • Re: Are we at the end of the road musically??Book (39 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 23:16:11 -0400

13. ARSCLIST Digest - 23 Oct 2006 to 24 Oct 2006 (#2006-290)
    • Re: ARSCLIST Digest - 23 Oct 2006 to 24 Oct 2006 (#2006-290) (57 lines)
      From: Tommy Sjöberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:55:46 +0200

14. audio into laptop
    • audio into laptop (20 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 07:13:57 -0500
    • Re: audio into laptop (24 lines)
      From: Jos Van Dyck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:56:42 -0400

15. Author needs specific label scans
    • Author needs specific label scans (28 lines)
      From: Ron Fial <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:55:29 -0700

16. Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire)
    • Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (97 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 08:18:56 -0400
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (36 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 05:50:16 -0700
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (48 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 19:09:17 -0400
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (36 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 20:48:31 -0400
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (47 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 20:55:03 -0400
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (40 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:28:05 -0700
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (56 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 21:30:36 -0400
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (49 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 22:32:17 -0400
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (21 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 23:51:52 -0400
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (31 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 05:57:09 -0400
    • Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (69 lines)
      From: Al Quaglieri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 08:05:42 -0400
    • Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (53 lines)
      From: Al Quaglieri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 08:14:05 -0400
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (137 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 09:00:36 -0400
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (58 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:14:47 -0700
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (67 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:21:36 -0700
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (29 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 20:31:59 -0400
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (198 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 21:21:23 -0400
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (75 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 21:52:50 -0400
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (72 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:07:47 -0400
    • Re: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (31 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:15:38 +0000

17. Cajun & Creole Music Track listing?
    • Cajun & Creole Music Track listing? (19 lines)
      From: Rod Smear <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:13:16 -0700
    • Re: Cajun & Creole Music Track listing? (28 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 23:14:43 EDT

18. CD versus Download wa s "All hail the analogue revolution..."
    • Re: CD versus Download wa s "All hail the analogue revolution..." (26 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:25:36 +0000

19. CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..."
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (60 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:01:53 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (38 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:20:55 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (47 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 08:27:35 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (90 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 22:43:42 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (45 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 22:59:03 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (26 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:31:17 -0500
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (134 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:09:06 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (80 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:30:51 -0500
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (168 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:40:58 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (23 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:29:52 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (33 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:51:26 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (49 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:02:25 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (36 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 14:03:45 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (90 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 19:30:30 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (166 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 19:58:42 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (217 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 19:35:26 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (125 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:39:32 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (175 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:55:39 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (235 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 19:34:46 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (242 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 17:23:13 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (284 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 20:48:23 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (51 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 21:10:14 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (107 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 22:52:56 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (27 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 03:08:24 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (103 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:59:47 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (31 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:11:12 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (32 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:17:47 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (25 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:52:28 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:15:12 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (27 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 18:03:51 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (44 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 20:25:05 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (31 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:49:08 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (49 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:11:10 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (27 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:13:30 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (59 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:39:01 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (37 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:03:21 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (44 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:10:20 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (35 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 23:40:44 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (39 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 21:04:11 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (52 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 00:46:33 -0400

20. Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire
    • Re: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (79 lines)
      From: Al Quaglieri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 22:15:21 -0400

21. commentary articles for newsletter
    • commentary articles for newsletter (23 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:32:25 -0700

22. Copy...right? was: The Incompetence at ENHS
    • Copy...right? was: The Incompetence at ENHS (72 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 22:54:19 -0400

23. Copyrights--was: The Incompetence at ENHS
    • Copyrights--was: The Incompetence at ENHS (39 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 19:20:27 -0500

24. Coyrights & Copywrongs--was: The Incompetence at ENHS
    • Coyrights & Copywrongs--was: The Incompetence at ENHS (23 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:22:51 -0400
    • Re: Coyrights & Copywrongs--was: The Incompetence at ENHS (45 lines)
      From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:26:55 -0500

25. CSO archive (was Symphonic Digital Programs)
    • Re: CSO archive (was Symphonic Digital Programs) (40 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:42:30 -0400
    • Re: CSO archive (was Symphonic Digital Programs) (19 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:18:31 EDT

26. Databases--was: Tape baking question
    • Databases--was: Tape baking question (367 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:00:22 -0400

27. Deletion from threads--was: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire)
    • Deletion from threads--was: Back-catalog (was Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire) (55 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 00:07:49 -0400

28. Digital "catalogry"
    • Digital "catalogry" (152 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:00:42 -0500

29. Digital "catalogry"--was: Tape baking question
    • Digital "catalogry"--was: Tape baking question (132 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:57:55 -0400
    • Re: Digital "catalogry"--was: Tape baking question (42 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:34:18 -0500
    • Re: Digital "catalogry"--was: Tape baking question (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:27:01 -0700
    • Re: Digital "catalogry"--was: Tape baking question (101 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:51:55 -0400
    • Re: Digital "catalogry"--was: Tape baking question (33 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:21:16 -0400

30. Digital Audio Workshop (NYC Area)
    • Digital Audio Workshop (NYC Area) (63 lines)
      From: Richard Kim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:30:54 -0400

31. Disney = God?--was: The Incompetence of Sonny Bono
    • Disney = God?--was: The Incompetence of Sonny Bono (28 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:39:20 -0500
    • Re: Disney = God?--was: The Incompetence of Sonny Bono (41 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 19:32:21 -0800
    • Re: Disney = God?--was: The Incompetence of Sonny Bono (46 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:25:16 +0000
    • Re: Disney = God?--was: The Incompetence of Sonny Bono (98 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:05:53 -0500
    • Re: Disney = God?--was: The Incompetence of Sonny Bono (121 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:45:25 -0500
    • Re: Disney = God?--was: The Incompetence of Sonny Bono (53 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:35:15 -0800

32. Distance test
    • Distance test (20 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:39:30 -0700
    • Re: Distance test (39 lines)
      From: Nipper <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:26:38 -0500
    • Re: Distance test (26 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:01:22 +0000

33. Dolby 422-B?
    • Re: Dolby 422-B? (46 lines)
      From: Steve Puntolillo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 02:03:21 -0400
    • Re: Dolby 422-B? (64 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 07:15:50 -0500

34. Donation/purchase of the pre-1942 sound recordings (Wikipedia)
    • Donation/purchase of the pre-1942 sound recordings (Wikipedia) (82 lines)
      From: Jon Noring <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 21:12:49 -0600
    • Re: Donation/purchase of the pre-1942 sound recordings (Wikipedia) (44 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 21:29:40 -0700
    • Re: Donation/purchase of the pre-1942 sound recordings (Wikipedia) (27 lines)
      From: Jon Noring <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:56:44 -0600
    • Re: Donation/purchase of the pre-1942 sound recordings (Wikipedia) (22 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:25:15 -0400

35. Dynamic-frequency Range
    • Dynamic-frequency Range (24 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:38:50 -0500
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (23 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 09:35:33 -0400
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (47 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:26:39 -0700
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (64 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:59:50 -0500
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (87 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:42:40 -0700
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (89 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:11:44 -0400
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (29 lines)
      From: Nipper <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:23:15 -0500
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (41 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:46:13 -0400
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (45 lines)
      From: Aaron Z Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:34:48 -0400
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (50 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:43:10 -0500
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (37 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:31:26 -0700
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (54 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:46:28 -0700
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (23 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:26:42 -0500
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (27 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:36:56 EDT
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (35 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:39:56 -0500
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (146 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:23:47 -0700
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (91 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:06:50 -0400
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (85 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:09:46 -0400
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (49 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:30:13 -0700
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (57 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:04:12 -0400
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (34 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:48:33 -0500
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (81 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:43:02 -0500
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (43 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:48:06 -0700
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (24 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:03:23 -0500
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (85 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:09:58 +0000
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (36 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:13:27 +0000
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (54 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:15:30 -0400
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (55 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:37:37 +0000
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (56 lines)
      From: Aaron Z Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:39:30 -0400
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (94 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:43:40 +0200
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (113 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:03:22 +0000
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (37 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:04:37 -0400
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (126 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:12:13 +0200
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (23 lines)
      From: Aaron Z Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:25:06 -0400
    • Re: Dynamic-frequency Range (45 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:39:40 +0000

36. e-mail lists in general--was: email courtesy and apologies to Tom.
    • e-mail lists in general--was: email courtesy and apologies to Tom. (69 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 01:13:58 -0400
    • Re: e-mail lists in general--was: email courtesy and apologies to Tom. (80 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:27:13 -0700
    • Re: e-mail lists in general--was: email courtesy and apologies to Tom. (25 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:13:04 -0400

37. Early Polydor electrics, the depression, etc
    • Early Polydor electrics, the depression, etc (160 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:31:05 -0400
    • Re: Early Polydor electrics, the depression, etc (46 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 19:24:55 -0400
    • Re: Early Polydor electrics, the depression, etc (97 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:26:47 -0700
    • Re: Early Polydor electrics, the depression, etc (117 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 18:06:06 -0400
    • Re: Early Polydor electrics, the depression, etc (60 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 22:36:08 -0400
    • Re: Early Polydor electrics, the depression, etc (40 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:23:48 +0200
    • Re: Early Polydor electrics, the depression, etc (65 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:47:24 -0400
    • Re: Early Polydor electrics, the depression, etc (51 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:09:08 -0400
    • Re: Early Polydor electrics, the depression, etc (26 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 21:22:35 -0400

38. Early stereo mass market tapes
    • Early stereo mass market tapes (35 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:25:43 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (64 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:17:36 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (73 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:46:59 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (35 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:31:00 EDT
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (66 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:57:03 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (76 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:25:02 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (79 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:51:15 -0700
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (115 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:07:42 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (34 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:36:44 -0500
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (80 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:54:15 -0700
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (51 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:03:53 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (78 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:22:51 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (89 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:07:07 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (62 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:28:10 -0700
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (143 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:57:33 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (24 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:12:07 -0500
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (44 lines)
      From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:56:59 +0200
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (95 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:05:57 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (31 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:32:10 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (55 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:11:32 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (48 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:27:32 -0500
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (57 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:00:29 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (36 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:33:17 -0500
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (48 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:51:23 -0700
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (63 lines)
      From: Wasserman, Robert A - WHS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:50:25 -0500
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (54 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:21:26 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (70 lines)
      From: Rollin' Recording <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:19:21 -0500
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (64 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:32:50 -0700
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (78 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:18:44 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (42 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:56:15 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (29 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:19:01 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (51 lines)
      From: Alex Hartov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:54:02 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (66 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:20:07 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (29 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:32:51 -0500
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (36 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:45:23 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (86 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:43:36 -0700
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (47 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:08:14 -0700
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (139 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:38:28 -0700
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (21 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:43:15 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (54 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:56:46 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (104 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:19:17 -0700
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (29 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:29:02 -0700
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (98 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:24:41 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (72 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:30:02 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (25 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:32:22 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (33 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:02:39 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (26 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:49:46 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (58 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:50:43 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (20 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:53:33 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (29 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 23:17:05 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (37 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:06:26 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (31 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:39:31 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (42 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:09:17 +0000
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (77 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 19:22:09 +0200
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (33 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 18:54:44 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (37 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:14:23 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (63 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:33:54 -0700
    • Re: Early stereo mass market tapes (73 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:41:47 -0400

39. Ediphone Cylinders
    • Ediphone Cylinders (30 lines)
      From: Jack Raymond <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 19:48:35 -0400
    • Re: Ediphone Cylinders (44 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 21:47:53 -0400
    • Re: Ediphone Cylinders (97 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:03:40 -0400
    • Re: Ediphone Cylinders (41 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 11:06:33 -0700
    • Ediphone Cylinders (34 lines)
      From: Jack Raymond <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:27:21 -0400
    • Re: Ediphone Cylinders (26 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:55:24 EDT
    • Re: Ediphone Cylinders (25 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:36:40 -0400
    • Re: Ediphone Cylinders (46 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:44:54 -0400
    • Re: Ediphone Cylinders (33 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:46:38 -0400
    • Re: Ediphone Cylinders (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:17:21 EDT

40. Edisoniae- ^
    • Re: Edisoniae- ^ (27 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 23:48:21 -0500
    • Re: Edisoniae- ^ (29 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:31:12 -0800
    • Re: Edisoniae- ^ (28 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:00:29 -0500
    • Re: Edisoniae- ^ (24 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:51:05 EST

41. Edisoniae--was: The Incompetence at ENHS
    • Edisoniae--was: The Incompetence at ENHS (21 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:01:58 -0400
    • Re: Edisoniae--was: The Incompetence at ENHS (46 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:25:35 -0700
    • Re: Edisoniae--was: The Incompetence at ENHS (46 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:58:45 -0700
    • Re: Edisoniae--was: The Incompetence at ENHS (43 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:21:28 -0800
    • Re: Edisoniae--was: The Incompetence at ENHS (69 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 19:15:33 -0800
    • Re: Edisoniae--was: The Incompetence at ENHS (34 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 22:41:40 -0500
    • Re: Edisoniae--was: The Incompetence at ENHS (50 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:30:15 -0800
    • Re: Edisoniae--was: The Incompetence at ENHS (30 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:32:38 -0800
    • Re: Edisoniae--was: The Incompetence at ENHS (58 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:12:24 -0500

42. Effect of vibrations on audio tape
    • Effect of vibrations on audio tape (30 lines)
      From: Mohn, Sylvia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:54:09 -0500
    • Re: Effect of vibrations on audio tape (42 lines)
      From: Alan Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:05:19 EDT
    • Re: Effect of vibrations on audio tape (103 lines)
      From: James Lindner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:09:07 -0400
    • Re: Effect of vibrations on audio tape (26 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:13:10 -0500
    • Re: Effect of vibrations on audio tape (39 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:21:19 +0200
    • Re: Effect of vibrations on audio tape (83 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:53:10 -0400
    • Re: Effect of vibrations on audio tape (100 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:07:11 -0400
    • Re: Effect of vibrations on audio tape (44 lines)
      From: Language Archives <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:09:44 -0500
    • Re: Effect of vibrations on audio tape (64 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:29:42 -0400
    • Re: Effect of vibrations on audio tape (40 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:45:53 -0700
    • Re: Effect of vibrations on audio tape (31 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:02:51 -0700
    • Re: Effect of vibrations on audio tape (57 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:05:02 -0400
    • Re: Effect of vibrations on audio tape (51 lines)
      From: Ron Fial <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:29:02 -0700
    • Re: Effect of vibrations on audio tape (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 23:11:25 EDT
    • Re: Effect of vibrations on audio tape (25 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:13:19 -0400
    • Re: Effect of vibrations on audio tape (27 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:20:20 -0400

43. email courtesy and apologies to Tom.
    • email courtesy and apologies to Tom. (86 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 20:04:57 -0700

44. European Archive Foundation
    • European Archive Foundation (29 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 14:58:13 -0400
    • Re: European Archive Foundation (42 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:35:50 -0700
    • Re: European Archive Foundation (30 lines)
      From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 15:10:23 -0500
    • Re: European Archive Foundation (35 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:16:54 -0400
    • Re: European Archive Foundation (33 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:27:41 -0700
    • Re: European Archive Foundation (34 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:46:53 -0400
    • Re: European Archive Foundation (42 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:54:47 -0400
    • Re: European Archive Foundation (31 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 17:17:06 -0700
    • Re: European Archive Foundation (36 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 21:38:50 -0400
    • Re: European Archive Foundation (25 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 21:41:18 -0400
    • Re: European Archive Foundation (48 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:53:57 -0700
    • Re: European Archive Foundation (36 lines)
      From: Bernd Wichert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 14:31:25 -0400
    • Re: European Archive Foundation (42 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 06:07:45 -0400

45. European Archives
    • Re: European Archives (24 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:18:38 -0700

46. Everything Louder Than Everything Else
    • Everything Louder Than Everything Else (317 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:24:52 -0400

47. FLAC?
    • FLAC? (40 lines)
      From: McCormick, Kathleen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:48:42 -0400
    • Re: FLAC? (31 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:07:23 -0700
    • Re: FLAC? (79 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:09:48 -0700
    • Re: FLAC? (127 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:03:07 -0400
    • Re: FLAC? (30 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:46:17 -0400
    • Re: FLAC? (27 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:51:43 -0400
    • Re: FLAC? (38 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:59:17 -0400
    • Re: FLAC? (37 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:06:12 +0000
    • Re: FLAC? (24 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:13:45 -0500
    • Re: FLAC? (81 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:51:04 -0400
    • Re: FLAC? (26 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:05:50 -0400
    • Re: FLAC? (38 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:37:46 -0700
    • Re: FLAC? (69 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:04:25 -0700
    • Re: FLAC? (45 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:57:07 -0700
    • Re: FLAC? (40 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:09:57 -0700
    • Re: FLAC? (70 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:50:48 -0700
    • Re: FLAC? (39 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:57:34 -0400
    • Re: FLAC? (29 lines)
      From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:32:25 +0200
    • Re: FLAC? (46 lines)
      From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:41:16 +0200
    • Re: FLAC? (39 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:22:22 +0000
    • Re: FLAC? (80 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 21:16:49 +0000
    • Re: FLAC? (41 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:49:13 -0400
    • Re: FLAC? (52 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 23:35:34 -0400
    • Re: FLAC? (34 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:05:02 +0000
    • Re: FLAC? (24 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:08:48 -0500
    • Re: FLAC? (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:29:28 EST

48. Fw: International Records
    • Fw: International Records (45 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:56:10 -0400
    • Re: Fw: International Records (50 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:22:59 -0400
    • Re: Fw: International Records (62 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:22:55 -0700
    • Re: Fw: International Records (78 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 06:39:55 -0400
    • Re: Fw: International Records (101 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:09:05 -0400
    • Re: Fw: International Records (61 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:22:32 +0200
    • Re: Fw: International Records (101 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:35:42 -0400
    • Re: Fw: International Records (124 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:54:21 -0400
    • Re: Fw: International Records (37 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:58:47 -0400

49. Fw: Searching for Sound Recordings
    • Fw: Searching for Sound Recordings (89 lines)
      From: Martin Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:12:50 -0600

50. Fw: [ARSCLIST] Fw: International Records
    • Fw: [ARSCLIST] Fw: International Records (137 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:23:58 -0400
    • Re: Fw: [ARSCLIST] Fw: International Records (161 lines)
      From: George Strawley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:25:05 -0400

51. Fw: [ARSCLIST] Record flattening
    • Fw: [ARSCLIST] Record flattening (120 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:34:10 -0400
    • Re: Fw: [ARSCLIST] Record flattening (24 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:22:23 -0400
    • Re: Fw: [ARSCLIST] Record flattening (171 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:19:42 -0700

52. fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle?
    • Re: fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (55 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 00:21:05 -0400
    • Re: fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (30 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 09:31:57 -0400
    • Re: fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (84 lines)
      From: Dave Nolan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 13:38:06 -0400
    • Re: fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (87 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 13:59:34 -0400
    • Re: fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (43 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 16:43:56 +0000
    • Re: fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (42 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 16:49:39 +0000
    • Re: fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (55 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 16:52:24 +0000
    • Re: fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (101 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 18:23:06 -0400
    • Re: fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (103 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 18:44:01 -0400
    • Re: fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (36 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:22:34 -0400
    • Re: fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (34 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:34:18 -0400
    • Re: fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (40 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 18:51:47 -0500
    • Re: fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (104 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 00:32:54 -0400

53. Fwd: Illustrated and Annotated History of Stereo Cutting Heads
    • Fwd: Illustrated and Annotated History of Stereo Cutting Heads (42 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:35:25 -0700

54. Fwd: Re: [ARSCLIST] Nikon sonic boom
    • Fwd: Re: [ARSCLIST] Nikon sonic boom (74 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 09:20:32 -0400
    • Fwd: Re: [ARSCLIST] Nikon sonic boom (66 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 09:22:16 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: Re: [ARSCLIST] Nikon sonic boom (89 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 08:44:02 -0500

55. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (78 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:36:16 EDT
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (48 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:45:35 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (121 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:49:16 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (34 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:57:02 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (118 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:31:42 -0700
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (80 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:40:26 -0700
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (182 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:43:58 -0700
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (94 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:04:34 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (148 lines)
      From: Nipper <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:08:01 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (109 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:44:43 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (50 lines)
      From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:38:20 +0200
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (28 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 19:04:20 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (25 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:44:56 +0000
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (98 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 15:22:51 EDT
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (42 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:21:21 -0700
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (34 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:26:23 +0000
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (40 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:56:47 +0000
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (55 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:16:38 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (28 lines)
      From: Mark Durenberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:29:02 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (73 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:02:28 +0000
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Dynamic-frequency Range (82 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 19:57:04 -0400

56. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Early stereo mass market tapes
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Early stereo mass market tapes (86 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:58:11 EDT

57. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Schwann
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Schwann (70 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:26:29 EST

58. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Thirties Stereo
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Thirties Stereo (60 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:43:38 EDT

59. fwd: ^ Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle?
    • Re: fwd: ^ Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (24 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 00:54:15 -0400

60. George Mitchell Collection - 8 new cd releases (Blues) Big Joe Williams, Buddy Moss, AO
    • George Mitchell Collection - 8 new cd releases (Blues) Big Joe Williams, Buddy Moss, AO (22 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 15:13:34 -0400

61. German Spoken Word
    • German Spoken Word (20 lines)
      From: Bernd Wichert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:41:35 -0400
    • Re: German Spoken Word (34 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:58:21 -0700

62. Group plans to liquidate Tower Records - Yahoo! News
    • Group plans to liquidate Tower Records - Yahoo! News (14 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:27:57 -0500
    • Re: Group plans to liquidate Tower Records - Yahoo! News (25 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 12:04:27 -0700

63. Grundig EQ
    • Grundig EQ (23 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 18:07:56 -0400
    • Re: Grundig EQ (38 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:56:24 -0500
    • Re: Grundig EQ (14 lines)
      From: JOHN HALL <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 21:41:28 -0500
    • Grundig EQ (27 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:25:50 -0400
    • Re: Grundig EQ (56 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:33:05 -0500
    • Re: Grundig EQ (62 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:18:30 -0500
    • Re: Grundig EQ (60 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:37:01 -0400
    • Grundig EQ (38 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 09:21:05 -0400
    • Re: Grundig EQ (49 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 13:03:25 -0500
    • Re: Grundig EQ (30 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 13:32:06 -0500
    • Grundig EQ (20 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 09:18:11 -0400
    • Re: Grundig EQ (28 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:34:47 -0500

64. Harmony acoustics, 1925
    • Harmony acoustics, 1925 (78 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:00:22 -0400
    • Re: Harmony acoustics, 1925 (96 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:13:59 -0700
    • Re: Harmony acoustics, 1925 (110 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:31:32 -0400
    • Re: Harmony acoustics, 1925 (24 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:52:16 -0400
    • Re: Harmony acoustics, 1925 (33 lines)
      From: Aaron Z Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:51:11 -0400
    • Re: Harmony acoustics, 1925 (133 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:55:44 -0700
    • Re: Harmony acoustics, 1925 (160 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:12:37 -0700
    • Re: Harmony acoustics, 1925 (41 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:26:52 -0400
    • Re: Harmony acoustics, 1925 (39 lines)
      From: Aaron Z Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:17:39 -0400
    • Re: Harmony acoustics, 1925 (50 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:27:38 -0500
    • Re: Harmony acoustics, 1925 (83 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:56:27 +0200
    • Re: Harmony acoustics, 1925 (78 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:37:32 -0400
    • Re: Harmony acoustics, 1925 (51 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:00:08 -0500
    • Re: Harmony acoustics, 1925 (79 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:16:52 -0400

65. Having Nothing to do with the Warsaw Concerto
    • Having Nothing to do with the Warsaw Concerto (28 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 14:35:37 -0400
    • Re: Having Nothing to do with the Warsaw Concerto (44 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 15:22:25 -0400
    • Re: Having Nothing to do with the Warsaw Concerto (64 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 15:30:41 -0400
    • Re: Having Nothing to do with the Warsaw Concerto (56 lines)
      From: David Hamiton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 22:04:36 -0400

66. Haydn Society (was Early stereo mass market tapes)
    • Re: Haydn Society (was Early stereo mass market tapes) (80 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:32:15 -0400

67. Heifetz, was [ARSCLIST] Early stereo mass market tapes
    • Re: Heifetz, was [ARSCLIST] Early stereo mass market tapes (26 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:15:50 -0400

68. Hey Susannah
    • Hey Susannah (35 lines)
      From: Jonathan Thorn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:49:59 -0500

69. History of Audio Exhibit at SFO
    • History of Audio Exhibit at SFO (35 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:26:34 -0700
    • Re: History of Audio Exhibit at SFO (59 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 00:01:56 -0500
    • Re: History of Audio Exhibit at SFO (60 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:09:09 -0400
    • Re: History of Audio Exhibit at SFO (69 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:33:57 -0400

70. IASA 2007 Conference: Call for Papers
    • IASA 2007 Conference: Call for Papers (100 lines)
      From: Ilse Assmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:24:00 +0200

71. Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk
    • Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk (37 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:51:54 -0400
    • Re: Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk (35 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:07:37 -0400
    • Re: Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk (26 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:24:37 EDT
    • Re: Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk (43 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:28:27 -0400
    • Re: Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk (61 lines)
      From: Nipper <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:39:55 -0500
    • Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk (83 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:40:34 -0400
    • Re: Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk (59 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:53:34 -0400
    • Re: Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk (53 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:11:21 -0400
    • Re: Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk (56 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:06:22 -0400
    • Re: Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk (23 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:10:46 -0400
    • Re: Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk (76 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:13:39 -0400
    • Re: Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk (78 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:32:58 -0400
    • Re: Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk (29 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:39:26 -0400
    • Re: Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk (99 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:17:38 -0400
    • Re: Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk (24 lines)
      From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 01:38:11 -0700
    • Re: Instant Recording Discs, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Record Gunk (91 lines)
      From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:39:13 +0200

72. Interesting Copyright Article
    • Interesting Copyright Article (18 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:56:51 -0700
    • Re: Interesting Copyright Article (29 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 22:15:32 -0500
    • Re: Interesting Copyright Article (35 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:48:50 +0000

73. International Records
    • International Records (33 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:27:00 -0500
    • Re: International Records (43 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:24:47 +0100
    • Re: International Records (73 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:00:08 -0500

74. International Records- Corrected
    • International Records- Corrected (37 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:08:08 -0500

75. Jean-Philippe Rameau / Discography
    • Re: Jean-Philippe Rameau / Discography (58 lines)
      From: Discographie Rameau <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:28:06 +0200

76. Job Postings (2)
    • Job Postings (2) (85 lines)
      From: GeorgeBlood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 15:46:19 -0400
    • Re: Job Postings (2) (28 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 23:36:28 -0400

77. La Voce del Padrone
    • La Voce del Padrone (25 lines)
      From: Francesco Martinelli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 08:29:59 +0200
    • Re: La Voce del Padrone (54 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 08:58:14 -0400
    • Re: La Voce del Padrone (24 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:10:34 -0400

78. Lynx Two Install Question
    • Lynx Two Install Question (36 lines)
      From: Greg Yates <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:21:12 -0500
    • Re: Lynx Two Install Question (58 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:55:23 -0400
    • Re: Lynx Two Install Question (52 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:02:59 -0700
    • Re: Lynx Two Install Question (63 lines)
      From: Mark Durenberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:03:10 -0500

79. Magnetic Tape Terminology
    • Magnetic Tape Terminology (28 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:28:50 -0400
    • Re: Magnetic Tape Terminology (65 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:10:45 -0400
    • Re: Magnetic Tape Terminology (40 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:55:46 -0400
    • Re: Magnetic Tape Terminology (85 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:00:31 -0400
    • Re: Magnetic Tape Terminology (90 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:18:44 -0400

80. Making a dying genre relevant
    • Making a dying genre relevant (39 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 06:57:48 -0400
    • Re: Making a dying genre relevant (86 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 10:08:04 -0400
    • Re: Making a dying genre relevant (19 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 10:40:09 -0400
    • Re: Making a dying genre relevant (48 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:26:11 -0700
    • Re: Making a dying genre relevant (95 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 18:44:56 -0400
    • Re: Making a dying genre relevant (41 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:06:08 -0400

81. MARC Records for Open Reel
    • MARC Records for Open Reel (18 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:13:51 -0400
    • Re: MARC Records for Open Reel (44 lines)
      From: Susan Stinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:11:53 -0400
    • Re: MARC Records for Open Reel (58 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:49:29 -0400
    • Re: MARC Records for Open Reel (40 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:46:23 -0400
    • Re: MARC Records for Open Reel (32 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 21:05:17 -0400

82. MARC Records for Open Reel Tape
    • MARC Records for Open Reel Tape (30 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:48:24 -0400
    • Re: MARC Records for Open Reel Tape (33 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:27:39 -0500
    • Re: MARC Records for Open Reel Tape (53 lines)
      From: Tim Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:58:13 -0600
    • Re: MARC Records for Open Reel Tape (42 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:18:10 -0400
    • Re: MARC Records for Open Reel Tape (26 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:00:27 -0400
    • Re: MARC Records for Open Reel Tape (72 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 09:48:12 -0400
    • Re: MARC Records for Open Reel Tape (58 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 09:58:15 -0400
    • Re: MARC Records for Open Reel Tape (30 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:21:07 -0500
    • Re: MARC Records for Open Reel Tape (34 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:53:51 -0400
    • Re: MARC Records for Open Reel Tape (53 lines)
      From: Alec McLane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:00:50 -0400
    • Re: MARC Records for Open Reel Tape (67 lines)
      From: Jacqueline von Arb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:50:45 +0200

83. Max de Schauensee dates
    • Max de Schauensee dates (49 lines)
      From: Nick Patterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 10:02:10 -0400

84. Mercury labels
    • Mercury labels (16 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:49:18 -0400

85. message delivery
    • Re: message delivery (26 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:36:56 -0400
    • Re: message delivery (28 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 22:29:48 -0500
    • Re: message delivery (39 lines)
      From: eugene hayhoe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 06:08:10 -0800
    • Re: message delivery (29 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:39:17 -0500

86. message delivery, was [ARSCLIST] Mostly for laughs
    • Re: message delivery, was [ARSCLIST] Mostly for laughs (32 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:23:48 -0400

87. Mike Gray discographies
    • Mike Gray discographies (16 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:27:34 -0700
    • Re: Mike Gray discographies (41 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:42:21 -0400
    • Re: Mike Gray discographies (26 lines)
      From: Michael Fitzgerald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:19:31 -0400
    • Re: Mike Gray discographies (45 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:42:54 -0400
    • Re: Mike Gray discographies (58 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:55:18 +0200
    • Re: Mike Gray discographies (26 lines)
      From: Michael Fitzgerald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 18:09:06 -0400
    • Re: Mike Gray discographies (69 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 18:45:42 -0400
    • Re: Mike Gray discographies (30 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 22:56:27 -0400
    • Re: Mike Gray discographies (26 lines)
      From: Jos Van Dyck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:51:47 +0200

88. Mitsui / MAM-A Gold CD's
    • Mitsui / MAM-A Gold CD's (41 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:00:25 -0500
    • Re: Mitsui / MAM-A Gold CD's (51 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:28:59 -0500
    • Re: Mitsui / MAM-A Gold CD's (21 lines)
      From: Jeff Carroll <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:05:19 -0500
    • Re: Mitsui / MAM-A Gold CD's (31 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:17:20 -0500

89. More information of "stereo" Ellingtons
    • More information of "stereo" Ellingtons (30 lines)
      From: Larry Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:17:12 -0400
    • Re: More information of "stereo" Ellingtons (34 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:27:14 +0000

90. More open reel supplies questions
    • More open reel supplies questions (34 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:42:01 -0400
    • Re: More open reel supplies questions (56 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:39:19 -0400
    • Re: More open reel supplies questions (63 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:47:11 -0400
    • Re: More open reel supplies questions (22 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:50:46 -0400
    • Re: More open reel supplies questions (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:12:53 EDT
    • Re: More open reel supplies questions (29 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:23:41 -0500
    • Re: More open reel supplies questions (36 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:19:47 -0400
    • Re: More open reel supplies questions (32 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 20:18:07 -0400

91. Mostly for laughs
    • Mostly for laughs (20 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:56:04 -0700
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (30 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:43:46 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (45 lines)
      From: Mark Durenberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:09:52 -0500
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (55 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:00:41 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (63 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:40:54 -0700
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (76 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:43:25 -0700
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (104 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:48:56 -0500
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (85 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:07:47 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (24 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:24:41 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (48 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:45:06 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (38 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:03:37 -0700
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (35 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:09:31 -0700
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (64 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:14:42 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (66 lines)
      From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:51:42 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (72 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:15:44 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (92 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:44:02 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (53 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:24:41 -0500
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (29 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:57:32 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (36 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:36:22 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (40 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:25:55 -0500
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (46 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:12:20 +0000
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (44 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:41:43 +0000
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (53 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:59:44 -0500
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (49 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:08:16 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (28 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:20:29 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (40 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:00:48 -0500
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (46 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 22:12:13 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (63 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:32:59 -0500
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (58 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:11:24 EDT
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (97 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:21:42 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (100 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:31:46 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (109 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 22:52:48 -0500
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (35 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:59:12 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (25 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:05:44 -0700
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (27 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:55:38 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (25 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 01:14:15 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (130 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:52:29 +0200
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (56 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:12:29 -0700
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (29 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:33:51 -0400
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (60 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:08:46 +0200
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (85 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:44:07 -0500
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:49:43 -0700
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (48 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:29:05 EDT
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (71 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:59:29 -0500
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (26 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 09:26:03 +0000
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (57 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:14:03 +0000
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (46 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:16:03 +0000
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (58 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:04:34 -0700
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (33 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:31:19 -0700
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (30 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:21:20 -0700
    • Re: Mostly for laughs (30 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:30:23 -0400

92. mostly for laughs too-- audio in asphalt?
    • mostly for laughs too-- audio in asphalt? (38 lines)
      From: rodbrown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:40:16 -0700
    • Re: mostly for laughs too-- audio in asphalt? (46 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 03:23:18 -0500
    • Re: mostly for laughs too-- audio in asphalt? (60 lines)
      From: Susan Stinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:31:55 -0400
    • Re: mostly for laughs too-- audio in asphalt? (37 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:10:18 -0700
    • Re: mostly for laughs too-- audio in asphalt? (34 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:43:32 -0400

93. MP3
    • MP3 (53 lines)
      From: Craig Breaden <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:25:55 -0400
    • Re: MP3 (61 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:21:09 -0700
    • Re: MP3 (33 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:25:19 -0400
    • Re: MP3 (51 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 18:28:00 -0700
    • Re: MP3 (55 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:00:34 -0400
    • Re: MP3 (33 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:05:05 -0700
    • Re: MP3 (25 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:08:50 +0000
    • Re: MP3 (38 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:30:51 EDT
    • Re: MP3 (97 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:50:55 -0700
    • Re: MP3 (39 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 17:15:41 -0400
    • Re: MP3 (30 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 17:22:24 -0400
    • Re: MP3 (36 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:49:28 -0700
    • Re: MP3 (27 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 18:30:07 -0400
    • Re: MP3 (48 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:18:47 -0700
    • Re: MP3 (46 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:21:12 -0400
    • Re: MP3 (56 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:25:40 -0400

94. Music listening today
    • Music listening today (33 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 06:57:46 -0400

95. Music--was: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..."
    • Music--was: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (55 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:29:36 -0400
    • Re: Music--was: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (87 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 13:53:39 +0000

96. Musican's compensation, wa CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..."
    • Musican's compensation, wa CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (117 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:27:38 -0500
    • Re: Musican's compensation, wa CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (31 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:27:13 -0400
    • Re: Musican's compensation, wa CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (64 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:13:27 -0500
    • Re: Musican's compensation, wa CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (49 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:38:37 -0400
    • Re: Musican's compensation, wa CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (36 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:44:33 -0500
    • Re: Musican's compensation, wa CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (136 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:14:02 -0400
    • Re: Musican's compensation, wa CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (26 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 23:11:55 -0400
    • Re: Musican's compensation, wa CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (36 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:28:51 -0500
    • Re: Musican's compensation, wa CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (42 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:27:35 +0000
    • Re: Musican's compensation, wa CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (77 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:16:38 -0400
    • Re: Musican's compensation, wa CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (40 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 22:53:53 -0400
    • Re: Musican's compensation, wa CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (48 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 23:06:46 -0400
    • Re: Musican's compensation, wa CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (27 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 01:15:49 -0400
    • Re: Musican's compensation, wa CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (49 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 22:04:44 -0400
    • Re: Musican's compensation, wa CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (27 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 00:38:49 -0400

97. Musician's compensation wasCD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..."
    • Musician's compensation wasCD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (36 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:46:39 -0500
    • Re: Musician's compensation wasCD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (68 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 00:47:22 +0200
    • Re: Musician's compensation wasCD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (37 lines)
      From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:59:22 -0400

98. MythBusters - "archaeoacousitcs" - yesterday and this Sunday
    • Re: MythBusters - "archaeoacousitcs" - yesterday and this Sunday (54 lines)
      From: JJJJ <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:02:18 -0400
    • Re: MythBusters - "archaeoacousitcs" - yesterday and this Sunday (85 lines)
      From: Claus Trelby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:31:49 -0400
    • Re: MythBusters - "archaeoacousitcs" - yesterday and this Sunday (89 lines)
      From: Jeanette Berard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:39:46 -0700
    • Re: MythBusters - "archaeoacousitcs" - yesterday and this Sunday (108 lines)
      From: Claus Trelby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:55:15 -0400

99. Nanes; was - Early stereo mass market tapes
    • Re: Nanes; was - Early stereo mass market tapes (54 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:57:43 -0400

100. National Recorded Sound Preservation Study: Notice of Inquiry
     • National Recorded Sound Preservation Study: Notice of Inquiry (46 lines)
       From: Stephen C Leggett <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:39:45 -0400

101. New listings
     • New listings (28 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 07:45:45 -0400

102. Nikon sonic boom
     • Nikon sonic boom (36 lines)
       From: Marcia Segal <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 15:30:45 -0400
     • Re: Nikon sonic boom (15 lines)
       From: Jeff Carroll <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:56:03 -0400
     • Re: Nikon sonic boom (25 lines)
       From: Ross Fuqua <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 14:06:10 -0700

103. Nominations for the 2007 ARSC Awards for Excellence
     • Nominations for the 2007 ARSC Awards for Excellence (100 lines)
       From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 21:03:54 -0400

104. NPR HONORS RECORDINGS PRESERVED BY THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
     • NPR HONORS RECORDINGS PRESERVED BY THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS (100 lines)
       From: Marlan Green <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:45:49 -0400

105. October issue of Black Grooves
     • October issue of Black Grooves (52 lines)
       From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:51:22 -0400

106. off-topic: Indian Creek Delta Boys request
     • off-topic: Indian Creek Delta Boys request (40 lines)
       From: Pete Tinker <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:07:10 -0700

107. Programmable varispeed question
     • Re: Programmable varispeed question (36 lines)
       From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:16:47 -0400
     • Re: Programmable varispeed question (73 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:39:52 -0400
     • Re: Programmable varispeed question (79 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:47:53 -0400

108. Quantification of Music
     • Quantification of Music (17 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:24:20 -0500

109. Query
     • Query (16 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:11:44 EDT
     • Re: Query (33 lines)
       From: Jacqueline von Arb <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:52:16 +0200
     • Re: Query (30 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:57:58 -0700

110. Radio News and Sports Reports
     • Radio News and Sports Reports (68 lines)
       From: Suzanne Whitehouse <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:19:13 -0400
     • Re: Radio News and Sports Reports (87 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:56:36 -0400
     • Re: Radio News and Sports Reports (125 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:10:23 -0400
     • Re: Radio News and Sports Reports (46 lines)
       From: Bernd Wichert <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:13:34 -0400
     • Re: Radio News and Sports Reports (38 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:37:12 +0000
     • Re: Radio News and Sports Reports (33 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:11:01 -0400
     • Re: Radio News and Sports Reports (40 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 17:40:36 +0000
     • Re: Radio News and Sports Reports (26 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 17:17:36 -0500

111. RealAudio to WAV
     • Re: RealAudio to WAV (61 lines)
       From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:38:11 -0400
     • Re: RealAudio to WAV (20 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:47:06 -0400

112. RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company
     • RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (51 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:12:21 -0400
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (79 lines)
       From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:33:50 -0400
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (31 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:32:17 -0700
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (35 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:39:07 EDT
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (215 lines)
       From: Dismuke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:19:53 -0700
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (29 lines)
       From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 17:03:17 -0400
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (72 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 17:52:28 -0400
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (103 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:09:38 -0700
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (29 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:27:30 -0700
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (40 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:46:12 -0700
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (46 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:57:49 -0700
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (35 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 09:07:53 EDT
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (28 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:36:22 +0000
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (471 lines)
       From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:11:04 -0400
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (64 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:22:48 -0700
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (80 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:52:35 -0400
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (27 lines)
       From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 23:17:22 -0400
     • Re: RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company (145 lines)
       From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:40:55 -0400

113. Recommended CD-R's
     • Recommended CD-R's (24 lines)
       From: Jim Long <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:24:20 EDT
     • Re: Recommended CD-R's (38 lines)
       From: Dr. Cheryl Thurber <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:43:57 -0700
     • Re: Recommended CD-R's (16 lines)
       From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:05:11 -0700
     • Re: Recommended CD-R's (76 lines)
       From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:03:57 -0400
     • Re: Recommended CD-R's (96 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:27:10 -0400
     • Re: Recommended CD-R's (31 lines)
       From: Russell W. Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:04:20 -0400
     • Re: Recommended CD-R's (27 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:20:14 EDT
     • Re: Recommended CD-R's (28 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:03:25 -0700
     • Re: Recommended CD-R's (46 lines)
       From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 09:01:47 +0200
     • Re: Recommended CD-R's (42 lines)
       From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 07:28:12 -0400
     • Re: Recommended CD-R's (29 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 09:54:32 -0500
     • Re: Recommended CD-R's (26 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:29:32 -0400

114. Recommended CD-R's (and risks associated with their use)
     • Re: Recommended CD-R's (and risks associated with their use) (58 lines)
       From: Jacqueline von Arb <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 22:50:14 +0200
     • Re: Recommended CD-R's (and risks associated with their use) (38 lines)
       From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 09:13:52 -0400
     • Re: Recommended CD-R's (and risks associated with their use) (68 lines)
       From: Tommy Sjöberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:35:51 +0200
     • Re: Recommended CD-R's (and risks associated with their use) (84 lines)
       From: Jim Baldwin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:00:59 -0400
     • Re: Recommended CD-R's (and risks associated with their use) (43 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:47:40 -0700

115. Record flattening
     • Record flattening (20 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:30:50 -0400
     • Re: Record flattening (26 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:30:01 -0500
     • Re: Record flattening (67 lines)
       From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:38:11 -0700
     • Re: Record flattening (54 lines)
       From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:45:02 -0700
     • Re: Record flattening (40 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:15:13 -0400
     • Re: Record flattening (23 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:56:30 -0400
     • Re: Record flattening (36 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:20:56 -0500
     • Re: Record flattening (30 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:57:38 -0400
     • Re: Record flattening (45 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 21:07:57 -0400
     • Re: Record flattening (56 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:43:16 -0500

116. Record flattening test proposed
     • Record flattening test proposed (69 lines)
       From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:52:38 -0700

117. Record Gunk
     • Record Gunk (41 lines)
       From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:15:23 -0400
     • Re: Record Gunk (50 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:37:37 -0400
     • Re: Record Gunk (77 lines)
       From: Martin Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:06:09 -0500
     • Re: Record Gunk (77 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:25:23 -0400
     • Re: Record Gunk (74 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:27:05 -0400
     • Re: Record Gunk (88 lines)
       From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:48:33 -0700
     • Re: Record Gunk (45 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:08:06 -0700
     • Re: Record Gunk (20 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:27:54 -0500
     • Re: Record Gunk (33 lines)
       From: H. Duane Goldman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:45:27 -0500
     • Re: Record Gunk (39 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 19:11:00 -0400
     • Re: Record Gunk (55 lines)
       From: H. Duane Goldman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 18:49:38 -0500
     • Re: Record Gunk (21 lines)
       From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 23:03:08 -0400

118. Record Gunk (warning: alleged humor follows)
     • Re: Record Gunk (warning: alleged humor follows) (29 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 23:12:07 -0400
     • Re: Record Gunk (warning: alleged humor follows) (34 lines)
       From: H. Duane Goldman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 23:45:23 -0500

119. Recorded Heritage--was:The Incompetence at ENHS
     • Recorded Heritage--was:The Incompetence at ENHS (21 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:25:55 -0400

120. Recording rates for musicians.
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (50 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:27:46 -0400
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (68 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:38:21 -0500
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (25 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:17:47 -0700
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (46 lines)
       From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:29:02 -0400
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (26 lines)
       From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:39:52 -0400
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (67 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:17:02 -0500
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (78 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 23:37:24 -0400
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (43 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 23:25:05 -0500
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (52 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:53:19 -0500
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (141 lines)
       From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:15:05 -0400
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (80 lines)
       From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:16:41 -0400
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (46 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:40:29 -0500
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (60 lines)
       From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:47:53 -0400
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (74 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:57:08 -0500
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (90 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:28:30 -0500
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (36 lines)
       From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 19:51:18 -0400
     • Re: Recording rates for musicians. (35 lines)
       From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 22:38:26 -0400

121. removing adhesive from CD case
     • removing adhesive from CD case (32 lines)
       From: Tara Kennedy <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:10:24 -0400

122. replacement AC cord
     • replacement AC cord (21 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:32:58 -0500

123. RF problems - used to be - - Effect of vibrations on audio tape
     • RF problems - used to be - - Effect of vibrations on audio tape (89 lines)
       From: James Lindner <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 19:28:39 -0400
     • Re: RF problems - used to be - - Effect of vibrations on audio tape (124 lines)
       From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:08:22 -0400
     • Re: RF problems - used to be - - Effect of vibrations on audio tape (40 lines)
       From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 19:37:50 -0700
     • Re: RF problems - used to be - - Effect of vibrations on audio tape (31 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 09:32:55 EDT
     • Re: RF problems - used to be - - Effect of vibrations on audio tape (86 lines)
       From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:36:04 +0200
     • Re: RF problems - used to be - - Effect of vibrations on audio tape (24 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:54:08 -0500

124. Rock jazz sax obscura question
     • Rock jazz sax obscura question (28 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:20:25 -0400

125. Schedule For Radio Dismuke Broadcast With Kurt Nauck
     • Schedule For Radio Dismuke Broadcast With Kurt Nauck (58 lines)
       From: Dismuke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:56:50 -0800

126. Schwann
     • Schwann (33 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:31:25 -0400
     • Re: Schwann (48 lines)
       From: Dr. Cheryl Thurber <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:13:16 -0700
     • Re: Schwann (68 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 11:27:35 -0400
     • Schwann (30 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:06:26 -0400
     • Re: Schwann (48 lines)
       From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:54:10 -0500

127. Scotch 141
     • Scotch 141 (21 lines)
       From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:03:34 -0400
     • Re: Scotch 141 (29 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:50:28 -0400

128. seeking Technics 1500US service manual to borrow
     • seeking Technics 1500US service manual to borrow (23 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:27:25 -0400

129. Sony PR-200
     • Sony PR-200 (23 lines)
       From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:06:15 -0500

130. Soundtrack for Vitaphone short #2289, "The Notre Dame Glee Club, Premier Collegiate Glee Club", recorded 01/1928
     • Soundtrack for Vitaphone short #2289, "The Notre Dame Glee Club, Premier Collegiate Glee Club", recorded 01/1928 (33 lines)
       From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:37:29 -0400
     • Re: Soundtrack for Vitaphone short #2289, "The Notre Dame Glee Club, Premier Collegiate Glee Club", recorded 01/1928 (30 lines)
       From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:55:25 -0400
     • Re: Soundtrack for Vitaphone short #2289, "The Notre Dame Glee Club, Premier Collegiate Glee Club", recorded 01/1928 (62 lines)
       From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:30:47 -0400
     • Re: Soundtrack for Vitaphone short #2289, "The Notre Dame Glee Club, Premier Collegiate Glee Club", recorded 01/1928 (30 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:44:15 -0700
     • Re: Soundtrack for Vitaphone short #2289, "The Notre Dame Glee Club, Premier Collegiate Glee Club", recorded 01/1928 (36 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:30:42 -0500

131. Special Radio Dismuke Broadcast With Kurt Nauck
     • Special Radio Dismuke Broadcast With Kurt Nauck (100 lines)
       From: Dismuke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 20:19:10 -0700

132. Stereo
     • Re: Stereo (31 lines)
       From: JOHN HALL <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:16:51 -0500

133. Stereo Action--[ARSCLIST] Early stereo mass market tapes
     • Re: Stereo Action--[ARSCLIST] Early stereo mass market tapes (84 lines)
       From: Nipper <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:41:26 -0500
     • Re: Stereo Action--[ARSCLIST] Early stereo mass market tapes (94 lines)
       From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:53:26 -0400

134. sticky goop on a CD container
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (28 lines)
       From: Jeff Carroll <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 00:21:52 -0400
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (30 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 00:26:32 -0400
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (44 lines)
       From: Susan Stinson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:00:49 -0400
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (50 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:57:20 -0400

135. Stinson Calypso albums
     • Re: Stinson Calypso albums (135 lines)
       From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 14:15:48 -0400
     • Re: Stinson Calypso albums (166 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:39:10 -0700

136. streaming vs. downloading (was Try Real Alternative)
     • Re: streaming vs. downloading (was Try Real Alternative) (193 lines)
       From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:00:54 -0800
     • Re: streaming vs. downloading (was Try Real Alternative) (46 lines)
       From: Dismuke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 03:20:22 -0800

137. SV: [ARSCLIST] Acetate tape discolours tape box
     • SV: [ARSCLIST] Acetate tape discolours tape box (84 lines)
       From: Lars Gaustad <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:16:21 +0200
     • Re: SV: [ARSCLIST] Acetate tape discolours tape box (29 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:54:43 -0400

138. Symphonic Digital Programs
     • Symphonic Digital Programs (27 lines)
       From: Steph <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 12:56:06 -0700
     • Re: Symphonic Digital Programs (258 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:43:51 -0500
     • Re: Symphonic Digital Programs (20 lines)
       From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 09:41:53 -0700
     • Re: Symphonic Digital Programs (42 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 14:13:47 +0000
     • Re: Symphonic Digital Programs (63 lines)
       From: GeorgeBlood <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 15:44:26 -0400
     • Re: Symphonic Digital Programs (19 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:42:03 -0500
     • Symphonic Digital Programs (25 lines)
       From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:55:20 EDT
     • Re: Symphonic Digital Programs (50 lines)
       From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:42:32 -0400
     • Re: Symphonic Digital Programs (22 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:52:36 -0500

139. Tape baking question
     • Tape baking question (20 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 22:20:14 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (39 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 21:25:00 -0500
     • Re: Tape baking question (37 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 22:38:40 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (48 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 23:16:10 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (57 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 23:30:41 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (84 lines)
       From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 22:52:19 -0700
     • Re: Tape baking question (16 lines)
       From: Jeff Carroll <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 02:09:46 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (41 lines)
       From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 23:20:17 -0700
     • Re: Tape baking question (106 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 06:32:52 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (37 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 07:54:28 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (54 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 08:42:54 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (76 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:02:17 -0500
     • Re: Tape baking question (80 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:21:50 -0500
     • Re: Tape baking question (147 lines)
       From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 13:44:51 -0700
     • Re: Tape baking question (159 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 17:58:49 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (174 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 17:07:12 -0500
     • Re: Tape baking question (160 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 18:08:06 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (182 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 18:17:16 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (35 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 18:27:53 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (222 lines)
       From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:21:24 -0700
     • Re: Tape baking question (232 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 20:50:45 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (86 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 21:30:53 -0500
     • Re: Tape baking question (342 lines)
       From: John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 21:44:56 -0500
     • Re: Tape baking question (123 lines)
       From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 20:48:40 -0700
     • Re: Tape baking question (59 lines)
       From: Lists <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:46:45 -0500
     • Re: Tape baking question (336 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 06:24:26 -0400

140. Tape Baking Question
     • Tape Baking Question (24 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:15:33 -0400
     • Re: Tape Baking Question (52 lines)
       From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:13:47 -0700

141. Tape baking question
     • Re: Tape baking question (31 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:10:10 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (148 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:23:47 -0500
     • Re: Tape baking question (181 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:37:42 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (33 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:40:06 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (62 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:01:09 -0500
     • Re: Tape baking question (69 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:03:31 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (96 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:19:53 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (105 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:32:24 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (25 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:35:18 -0400
     • Re: Tape baking question (151 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 01:44:11 -0500
     • Re: Tape baking question (74 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:44:46 -0500
     • Re: Tape baking question (19 lines)
       From: Adrian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:41:00 GMT
     • Re: Tape baking question (46 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:58:59 +0000

142. Temperament--was: Are we at the end of the road musically??
     • Temperament--was: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (33 lines)
       From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 22:51:15 -0400
     • Re: Temperament--was: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (50 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 11:26:07 +0000
     • Re: Temperament--was: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (40 lines)
       From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 20:26:04 -0400
     • Re: Temperament--was: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (49 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 17:34:44 -0700
     • Re: Temperament--was: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (90 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:54:36 +0000
     • Re: Temperament--was: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (26 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:47:33 -0400
     • Re: Temperament--was: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (47 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:26:03 +0000
     • Re: Temperament--was: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (24 lines)
       From: Steven Barr <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 18:14:34 -0400
     • Re: Temperament--was: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (22 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 20:32:46 -0400
     • Re: Temperament--was: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (34 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:26:37 +0000
     • Re: Temperament--was: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (43 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:57:42 -0400
     • Re: Temperament--was: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (40 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:31:29 +0000
     • Re: Temperament--was: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (22 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:53:52 -0400
     • Re: Temperament--was: Are we at the end of the road musically?? (58 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 12:16:11 +0000

143. Thanks for Civil Rights and Golf Information
     • Thanks for Civil Rights and Golf Information (46 lines)
       From: Suzanne Whitehouse <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:37:25 -0400
     • Re: Thanks for Civil Rights and Golf Information (89 lines)
       From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:21:16 -0800

144. The (Alleged) Incompetence at ENHS
     • Re: The (Alleged) Incompetence at ENHS (25 lines)
       From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 06:37:26 -0500
     • Re: The (Alleged) Incompetence at ENHS (48 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:00:28 -0400
     • Re: The (Alleged) Incompetence at ENHS (22 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:44:55 -0400

145. The Art of Trolling
     • The Art of Trolling (29 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:22:57 -0700

146. The Incompetence at ENHS
     • The Incompetence at ENHS (41 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:06:16 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (62 lines)
       From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:58:53 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (104 lines)
       From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:20:47 +0200
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (46 lines)
       From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:45:28 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (122 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:53:05 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (81 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:30:32 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (67 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:00:32 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (144 lines)
       From: Sam Brylawski <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:12:20 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (118 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:36:44 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (203 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:43:32 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (143 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:50:35 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (142 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:43:42 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (101 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:49:01 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (212 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:51:10 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (167 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:53:41 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (233 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:59:46 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (168 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:02:48 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (206 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:06:30 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (178 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:09:42 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (122 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:14:36 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (230 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:42:53 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (159 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:47:25 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (282 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:02:21 -0500
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (191 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:22:04 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (270 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:36:11 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (225 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:38:47 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (249 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:40:34 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (18 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:43:06 -0500
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (256 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:20:35 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (291 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:14:12 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (146 lines)
       From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:00:08 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (45 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:55:02 -0500
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (22 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:00:16 -0500
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (36 lines)
       From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:57:37 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (67 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:07:02 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (150 lines)
       From: Gregory Lukow <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:59:54 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (30 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 17:39:16 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (122 lines)
       From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 21:54:08 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (124 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:16:13 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (155 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:27:32 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (139 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:31:51 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (158 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:38:26 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (30 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 19:53:11 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (211 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:57:12 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (63 lines)
       From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 09:50:02 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (37 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 07:40:14 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (23 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 07:59:45 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (42 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 11:13:16 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (100 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:16:38 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (62 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:40:42 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (27 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:38:27 +0000
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (46 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:02:22 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (128 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:08:46 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (54 lines)
       From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 19:26:55 -0500
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (20 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:04:42 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (21 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:10:28 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (24 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:17:59 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (81 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:43:14 -0700
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (34 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:45:00 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (34 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:12:10 -0800
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (54 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 19:00:23 -0500
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (31 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 19:37:17 -0500
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (55 lines)
       From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:01:55 -0500
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (25 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:19:39 -0500
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (38 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:30:49 -0500
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (55 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:41:21 -0500
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (26 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:56:51 -0500
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (24 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:10:54 -0500
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (32 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:27:52 -0500
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS (22 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 22:24:45 -0500

147. The Incompetence at ENHS ^
     • Re: The Incompetence at ENHS ^ (28 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 23:06:17 -0400

148. The incompetence of Sonny Bono
     • The incompetence of Sonny Bono (64 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:43:33 -0400
     • Re: The incompetence of Sonny Bono (66 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:21:23 -0400

149. The Incompetence of Sonny Bono
     • Re: The Incompetence of Sonny Bono (84 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:44:04 -0400
     • Re: The Incompetence of Sonny Bono (41 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 22:45:15 +0000

150. The incompetence of Sonny Bono
     • Re: The incompetence of Sonny Bono (37 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:18:23 -0800

151. The Incompetence of Sonny Bono
     • Re: The Incompetence of Sonny Bono (34 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:21:51 -0800
     • Re: The Incompetence of Sonny Bono (71 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:34:42 -0500
     • Re: The Incompetence of Sonny Bono (59 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:51:11 -0500

152. The incompetence of Sonny Bono
     • Re: The incompetence of Sonny Bono (15 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:57:52 -0500

153. The Incompetence of Sonny Bono
     • Re: The Incompetence of Sonny Bono (31 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:17:29 -0800
     • Re: The Incompetence of Sonny Bono (49 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:53:36 -0500
     • Re: The Incompetence of Sonny Bono (30 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:15:37 +0000
     • Re: The Incompetence of Sonny Bono (33 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:11:41 -0800

154. The REA Song?
     • The REA Song? (28 lines)
       From: Craig Breaden <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:58:20 -0400
     • Re: The REA Song? (54 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:17:50 -0400

155. The Thomas A. Edison Music Video Co
     • The Thomas A. Edison Music Video Co (18 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 12:55:08 -0400

156. Thirties Stereo
     • Thirties Stereo (18 lines)
       From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:51:18 -0400
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (38 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:21:48 -0400
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (102 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:17:09 -0700
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (120 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:51:24 -0400
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (22 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 01:02:07 -0400
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (76 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 01:10:36 -0400
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (147 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 07:42:09 -0400
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (30 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:06:59 +0000
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (24 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 09:41:51 -0400
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (114 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 09:17:13 -0500
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (268 lines)
       From: Larry Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:02:12 -0400
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (28 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:03:43 -0700
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (466 lines)
       From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:24:48 -0400
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (53 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:49:03 -0400
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (20 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 17:48:56 -0400
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (227 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:50:14 -0700
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (231 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:56:08 -0700
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (52 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:00:53 -0700
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (72 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 21:13:11 -0400
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (240 lines)
       From: Larry Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:42:25 -0400
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (25 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:09:42 +0000
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (158 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 06:21:48 -0400
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (183 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 07:41:19 -0400
     • Re: Thirties Stereo (192 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 07:53:30 -0400

157. This week's listings
     • This week's listings (42 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 07:50:40 -0400

158. Tonight's MythBusters - "archaeoacousitcs"
     • Tonight's MythBusters - "archaeoacousitcs" (26 lines)
       From: JJJJ <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:22:02 -0400
     • Re: Tonight's MythBusters - "archaeoacousitcs" (40 lines)
       From: Jeanette Berard <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:02:49 -0700
     • Re: Tonight's MythBusters - "archaeoacousitcs" (47 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:19:13 -0500
     • Re: Tonight's MythBusters - "archaeoacousitcs" (61 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:32:43 -0400
     • Re: Tonight's MythBusters - "archaeoacousitcs" (23 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 21:49:11 -0400

159. Trolls--was: ^ The Incompetence at ENHS
     • Trolls--was: ^ The Incompetence at ENHS (20 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:06:31 -0400

160. Try Real Alternative (was RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company)
     • Try Real Alternative (was RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company) (50 lines)
       From: Jon Noring <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:48:59 -0600
     • Re: Try Real Alternative (was RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company) (174 lines)
       From: Dismuke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:20:22 -0700
     • Re: Try Real Alternative (was RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company) (44 lines)
       From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:49:03 -0400
     • Re: Try Real Alternative (was RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company) (34 lines)
       From: Jon Noring <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 22:52:10 -0600
     • Re: Try Real Alternative (was RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company) (173 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:49:44 +0000
     • Re: Try Real Alternative (was RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company) (39 lines)
       From: Joel Bresler <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:16:36 -0500
     • Re: Try Real Alternative (was RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company) (37 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:55:26 -0800
     • Re: Try Real Alternative (was RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company) (185 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:38:25 -0500
     • Re: Try Real Alternative (was RealNetworks -- a horrid format from a horrible company) (160 lines)
       From: Dismuke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:28:25 -0800

161. Unique 1/4" splicing tool...
     • Unique 1/4" splicing tool... (41 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:49:27 -0400
     • Re: Unique 1/4" splicing tool... (56 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:43:05 -0500

162. unknown artists and archives
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (24 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:53:46 -0500
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (48 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:29:48 -0700
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (33 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:46:33 -0400
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (29 lines)
       From: LeRoy <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 19:30:19 -0600
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (29 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:03:47 -0400
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (37 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:11:45 -0400
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (47 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:42:37 -0400
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (56 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:51:49 -0700

163. Very good deal on T-Y blue-dye CD media
     • Very good deal on T-Y blue-dye CD media (21 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 06:22:51 -0400

164. Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog
     • Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (27 lines)
       From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:46:31 -0400
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (41 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:25:07 -0700
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (52 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:42:40 -0400
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (59 lines)
       From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:41:57 -0400
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (28 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:08:31 -0500
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (38 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:11:11 -0700
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (33 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:19:57 EDT
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (39 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:27:50 -0400
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (69 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:36:56 -0400
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (75 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:53:10 -0400
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (101 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:06:33 -0400
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (79 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 14:08:22 -0700
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (28 lines)
       From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:17:56 -0400
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (37 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:30:06 -0400
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (35 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:40:26 -0700
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (37 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:31:27 -0700
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (43 lines)
       From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 20:32:08 -0400
     • Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (29 lines)
       From: Jack Raymond <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 08:31:33 -0400
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (76 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:37:58 -0400
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (106 lines)
       From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:00:53 -0400
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (110 lines)
       From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 14:02:02 -0400
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (53 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:09:30 +0000
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (134 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:13:56 -0400
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (192 lines)
       From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:41:16 -0400
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (19 lines)
       From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:27:50 -0700
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (57 lines)
       From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:05:07 -0400
     • Re: Warsaw Concerto / STINSON SLP 38 / SCHWANN Catalog (67 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:35:04 -0700

165. Watermarking
     • Watermarking (18 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:58:54 -0500

166. Wergo
     • Wergo (22 lines)
       From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:21:50 -0400

167. William Randolph Hearst
     • William Randolph Hearst (88 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:54:02 -0400
     • Re: William Randolph Hearst (22 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:35:59 -0400
     • Re: William Randolph Hearst (40 lines)
       From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:17:46 -0500

168. World Music
     • World Music (23 lines)
       From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:54:00 -0400

169. Yoko Sues EMI
     • Yoko Sues EMI (104 lines)
       From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:25:00 -0400

170. [78-l (et al)] ^ Re: Sticky goop on jewel cases
     • Re: [78-l (et al)] ^ Re: Sticky goop on jewel cases (40 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 00:51:05 -0400

171. ^ Distance test
     • Re: ^ Distance test (15 lines)
       From: Steven C. Barr(x) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:25:37 -0400

172. ^ sticky goop on a CD container
     • Re: ^ sticky goop on a CD container (23 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 01:09:00 -0400