ARSCLIST Archives – September 2006

1. "All hail the analogue revolution..."
   • "All hail the analogue revolution..." (19 lines)
     From: Jonathan Wise <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:02:07 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (33 lines)
     From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:40:29 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (56 lines)
     From: Jeanette Berard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:01:42 -0700
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (73 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:16:27 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (25 lines)
     From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:24:46 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (24 lines)
     From: Mark Durenberger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:53:27 -0500
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (39 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:16:56 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (27 lines)
     From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:03:29 -0700
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (39 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:51:41 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (34 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:20:41 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (47 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:39:38 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (48 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:34:22 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (37 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:50:39 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (31 lines)
     From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:19:37 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (30 lines)
     From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:35:33 -0700
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (29 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:18:12 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (32 lines)
     From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:31:53 -0700
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (30 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:42:22 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (41 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:09:04 +0000
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (35 lines)
     From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:11:17 -0500
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (64 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:09:16 -0700
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (28 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:25:30 -0700
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (76 lines)
     From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:46:43 -0500
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (68 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:47:59 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (23 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:34:02 -0700
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (32 lines)
     From: Konrad Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:38:12 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (40 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:16:35 -0700
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (60 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:26:47 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (38 lines)
     From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:19:06 -0700
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (38 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:08:29 +0000
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (63 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:23:51 +0000
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (18 lines)
     From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:23:00 +0200
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (94 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:07:15 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (63 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:31:35 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (91 lines)
     From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:29:29 +0200
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (101 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:38:07 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (100 lines)
     From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:19:18 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (47 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:58:56 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (117 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:11:17 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (42 lines)
     From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:22:42 -0700
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (28 lines)
     From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:36:50 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (56 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:44:14 EDT
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (28 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:51:34 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (23 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:20:15 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (45 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:32:14 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (31 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:37:21 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (81 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:55:41 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (39 lines)
     From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:59:03 +0200
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (37 lines)
     From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:30:09 -0500
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (47 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:43:14 +0000
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (30 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:16:25 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (41 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:18:45 +0000
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (27 lines)
     From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:14:11 -0500
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (25 lines)
     From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:38:01 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (36 lines)
     From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:52:55 -0700
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (76 lines)
     From: Zender, Rick D. <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:19:47 -0400
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (34 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:19:15 -0400

2. "All hail the analogue revolution..." (II)
   • Re: "All hail the analogue revolution..." (II) (33 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:05:43 -0400

3. 1/4" tape available
   • 1/4" tape available (21 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:43:22 -0400

4. 7" NAB reels, was: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies?
   • 7" NAB reels, was: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (45 lines)
     From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:51:02 -0700
   • Re: 7" NAB reels, was: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (55 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:01:50 -0400
   • Re: 7" NAB reels, was: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (53 lines)
     From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:14:28 -0700
   • Re: 7" NAB reels, was: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (21 lines)
     From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:41:11 -0700

5. A recording history question
   • A recording history question (24 lines)
     From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:53:22 -0500

6. a tape archive probably worth preserving if not already being preserved
   • a tape archive probably worth preserving if not already being preserved (39 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:33:21 -0400
   • Re: a tape archive probably worth preserving if not already being preserved (24 lines)
     From: Matthew Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:45:34 -0400
   • Re: a tape archive probably worth preserving if not already being preserved (50 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:44:15 -0700

7. Advice on cassette decks?
   • Re: Advice on cassette decks? (37 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:41:40 +0000
   • Re: Advice on cassette decks? (68 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 09:28:41 -0400
   • Re: Advice on cassette decks? (97 lines)
     From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:06:36 -0400
   • Re: Advice on cassette decks? (33 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 12:29:57 -0400
   • Re: Advice on cassette decks? (49 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:13:18 -0400
   • Re: Advice on cassette decks? (33 lines)
     From: Tommy Sjöberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 20:01:41 +0200

8. Announcement (deadline: Sept. 15) for The Brenda McCallum Prize
   • Announcement (deadline: Sept. 15) for The Brenda McCallum Prize (59 lines)
     From: Marcia Segal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 08:09:57 -0400

9. Another internet archive (fwd)
   • Another internet archive (fwd) (64 lines)
     From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:30:32 -0500

10. ARSC Conference 2007: Call for Presentations
    • ARSC Conference 2007: Call for Presentations (46 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:21:26 -0400

11. ARSC Newsletter 112 deadline
    • ARSC Newsletter 112 deadline (32 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:43:03 -0700
    • Re: ARSC Newsletter 112 deadline (52 lines)
      From: Martin Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:42:48 -0500

12. ARSC Preservation Grants Program
    • ARSC Preservation Grants Program (65 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:28:46 -0400

13. ARSC Research Grants Program
    • ARSC Research Grants Program (66 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:29:24 -0400

14. ARSCLIST guidelines
    • ARSCLIST guidelines (57 lines)
      From: Sam Brylawski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:04:51 -0400
    • Re: ARSCLIST guidelines (76 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 22:48:06 -0400
    • Re: ARSCLIST guidelines (84 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 23:09:14 -0400
    • Re: ARSCLIST guidelines (17 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 08:05:10 -0400

15. ARSCLIST Preservation supplies
    • Re: ARSCLIST Preservation supplies (26 lines)
      From: Marlan Green <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:18:03 -0400

16. Audio Catalogue - Titta Ruffo
    • Audio Catalogue - Titta Ruffo (36 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:07:09 -0700

17. Azimuth page updated
    • Azimuth page updated (40 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:22:38 -0400

18. Backing up -- it's now mainstream
    • Backing up -- it's now mainstream (19 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 07:26:48 -0400

19. Barr's 7th Law...was:Registry of Digital Masters
    • Barr's 7th Law...was:Registry of Digital Masters (27 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:28:58 -0400
    • Re: Barr's 7th Law...was:Registry of Digital Masters (59 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:25:31 -0400
    • Re: Barr's 7th Law...was:Registry of Digital Masters (56 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 21:52:33 -0400

20. Ben Bernie recording
    • Ben Bernie recording (17 lines)
      From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:53:38 -0400

21. Ben Bernie recording sought
    • Ben Bernie recording sought (23 lines)
      From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:49:13 -0400

22. Best Software Noise Reduction Algorithms?
    • Best Software Noise Reduction Algorithms? (39 lines)
      From: DSL FODA01 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:53:10 -0400
    • Re: Best Software Noise Reduction Algorithms? (76 lines)
      From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:16:35 +0200

23. Boyd, "We're the Light Crust Doughboys from Burrus Mill", University of Texas Press
    • Boyd, "We're the Light Crust Doughboys from Burrus Mill", University of Texas Press (15 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 21:51:41 -0500

24. British Library Sound Archives - new releases Bernard Shaw, H.G.Wells
    • British Library Sound Archives - new releases Bernard Shaw, H.G.Wells (18 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:40:48 -0400

25. Car cassette adapters (was On the beaten 8-track...)
    • Re: Car cassette adapters (was On the beaten 8-track...) (41 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:27:18 -0400

26. Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibi...
    • Re: Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibi... (51 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 10:13:48 EDT

27. Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?
    • Re: Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (59 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:35:15 +0000
    • Re: Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (39 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:44:06 -0500
    • Re: Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (108 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 22:57:45 -0400
    • Re: Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 20:01:57 -0700
    • Re: Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (68 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 23:15:02 -0400
    • Re: Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (56 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 00:26:48 -0400
    • Re: Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (112 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 14:44:29 +0000
    • Re: Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (32 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 20:55:59 -0400

28. CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..."
    • CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (38 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:43:30 -0500
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (47 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:43:18 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (74 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:59:40 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (29 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:34:19 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (56 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:31:10 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (78 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:31:33 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (30 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:37:15 EDT
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (37 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:45:50 EDT
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (86 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:17:15 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (28 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:22:22 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (74 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:46:54 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (52 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:58:09 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (128 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:07:45 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (111 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:23:16 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (164 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:04:29 -1000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (165 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:27:57 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (43 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:46:51 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (68 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:36:42 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (74 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:48:50 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (75 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:10:49 -0500
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (42 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:02:07 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (40 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:22:20 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (120 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:07:45 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (29 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:18:02 -0500
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (26 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:55:34 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (29 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:23:46 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (61 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:26:22 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (28 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:11:54 -0500
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (80 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:23:12 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (44 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:33:00 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (39 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:41:51 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (29 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:43:48 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (105 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:44:04 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (23 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:18:30 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (158 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:33:34 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (125 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:40:17 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (30 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:42:22 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (35 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:10:45 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (46 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:37:49 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (37 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:43:47 +0000
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (57 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:40:15 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (62 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:47:17 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (29 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:34:39 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (27 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:36:48 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (45 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:55:45 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (45 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:59:24 -0700
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (67 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:09:22 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (36 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:44:07 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (24 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:55:02 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (34 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:57:26 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (25 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:14:21 -0400
    • Re: CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (46 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:50:52 +0000

29. CD versus Download  wa s "All hail the analogue revolution..."
    • Re: CD versus Download  wa s "All hail the analogue revolution..." (18 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:58:30 EDT

30. Cheap digicam
    • Cheap digicam (20 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:27:07 -0400

31. Commercial - highlights from our new auction list
    • Commercial - highlights from our new auction list (72 lines)
      From: Hawthorn's Antique Audio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 18:18:08 -0700
    • Re: Commercial - highlights from our new auction list (71 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 22:04:15 -0400

32. Comparable collections anywhere?
    • Comparable collections anywhere? (43 lines)
      From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:36:10 -0400
    • Re: Comparable collections anywhere? (46 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:07:23 -0500
    • Re: Comparable collections anywhere? (51 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:35:51 -0400
    • Re: Comparable collections anywhere? (45 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:24:25 -0700
    • Re: Comparable collections anywhere? (45 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:34:27 -0700
    • Re: Comparable collections anywhere? (100 lines)
      From: Klara Foeller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:59:15 -0500

33. Computer choice and pricing (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-))
    • Computer choice and pricing (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-)) (32 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 23:08:19 -0700
    • Re: Computer choice and pricing (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-)) (45 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 19:37:19 -0400
    • Re: Computer choice and pricing (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-)) (26 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 16:40:55 -0700

34. DAT's
    • DAT's (17 lines)
      From: John Loy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:11:28 -0400
    • Re: DAT's (33 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:03:21 -0700

35. DAT's - where to look for specialized restoration services
    • Re: DAT's - where to look for specialized restoration services (68 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:04:35 -0400

36. discography of "direct-to-disk revival"?
    • discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (30 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:51:05 -0400
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (50 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:47:09 -0700
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (66 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:10:00 -0400
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (56 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:26:34 -0500
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (78 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:59:33 -0400
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (34 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:58:55 -0700
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (48 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:15:11 -0400
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (101 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:19:51 -0400
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (108 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:31:24 -0400
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (46 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:28:38 -0700
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (132 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:54:37 -0400
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (26 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:51:14 -0700
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (64 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:05:07 -0500
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (42 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:08:31 -0500
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (49 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:12:36 -0500
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (51 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 01:22:35 -0400
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (87 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 06:06:35 -0400
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (74 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:26:07 -0700
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (109 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:40:33 -0700
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (96 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:54:34 -0400
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (35 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:01:54 -0700
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (47 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:59:38 -0400
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (22 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:38:03 -0400
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (34 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:10:59 -0500
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (48 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:34:45 -0400
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (71 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:58:31 -0500
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (66 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:34:31 -0400
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (68 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:14:34 +0200
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (138 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 06:51:53 -0400
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (29 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:26:54 +0000
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (37 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:38:30 +0000
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (38 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:04:26 +0000
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (38 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:05:04 -0700
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (32 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:24:35 -0700
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (58 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:41:21 -0700
    • Re: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (43 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:18:17 -0400

37. Dolby 422-B?
    • Dolby 422-B? (23 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:15:23 -0500

38. Droll Yankees DY-104 Songs of the Clippers
    • Droll Yankees DY-104 Songs of the Clippers (16 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:36:02 -0400

39. E. Power Biggs: The Glory Of Gabrieli (With Bonus Tracks) - All CDs $5.99 and Free Shipping at yourmusic.com
    • E. Power Biggs: The Glory Of Gabrieli (With Bonus Tracks) - All CDs $5.99 and Free Shipping at yourmusic.com (16 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:12:45 -0500
    • Re: E. Power Biggs: The Glory Of Gabrieli (With Bonus Tracks) - All CDs $5.99 and Free Shipping at yourmusic.com (30 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:53:35 -0400

40. E.Power Biggs was Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse
    • Re: E.Power Biggs was Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse (25 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:39:43 -0400

41. E.Power Biggs was Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire
    • Re: E.Power Biggs was Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (81 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:21:24 -0400

42. Early HiFi, was: Re: [ARSCLIST] discography of "direct-to-disk revival"?
    • Early HiFi, was: Re: [ARSCLIST] discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (172 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:19:32 +0200
    • Re: Early HiFi, was: Re: [ARSCLIST] discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (204 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:39:46 -0400
    • Re: Early HiFi, was: Re: [ARSCLIST] discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (28 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:52:24 -0400
    • Re: Early HiFi, was: Re: [ARSCLIST] discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (36 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:28:56 -0500
    • Re: Early HiFi, was: Re: [ARSCLIST] discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (46 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:44:01 -0400
    • Re: Early HiFi, was: Re: [ARSCLIST] discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (34 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:01:43 -0700

43. Edison Diamond Disc C-150 looking for a good home.
    • Edison Diamond Disc C-150 looking for a good home. (27 lines)
      From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:42:42 -0400

44. English copyright. Beware.
    • English copyright. Beware. (20 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:51:57 -0400
    • Re: English copyright. Beware. (34 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:06:17 -0500
    • Re: English copyright. Beware. (47 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:46:09 -0400

45. ET groove cutting ( was "More about ET preservation", was "Comparable collections anywhere?")
    • Re: ET groove cutting ( was "More about ET preservation", was "Comparable collections anywhere?") (82 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:29:48 -0700
    • Re: ET groove cutting ( was "More about ET preservation", was "Comparable collections anywhere?") (146 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:26:16 -0500
    • Re: ET groove cutting ( was "More about ET preservation", was "Comparable collections anywhere?") (69 lines)
      From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:51:04 -0400
    • Re: ET groove cutting ( was "More about ET preservation", was "Comparable collections anywhere?") (53 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:08:56 -0700
    • Re: ET groove cutting ( was "More about ET preservation", was "Comparable collections anywhere?") (75 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:51:23 +0200
    • Re: ET groove cutting ( was "More about ET preservation", was "Comparable collections anywhere?") (30 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:26:12 -0500

46. Fishing Expidition: old Roland Kirk LP
    • Fishing Expidition: old Roland Kirk LP (25 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:54:14 -0400

47. flash recorders
    • flash recorders (29 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:11:40 -0400
    • Re: flash recorders (66 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:37:35 -0400
    • Re: flash recorders (37 lines)
      From: Jonathan Wise <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:44:26 -0400
    • Re: flash recorders (58 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:09:05 -0600
    • Re: flash recorders (33 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:49:00 -0700
    • Re: flash recorders (65 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 05:55:27 -0400

48. Foreign Credential question
    • Foreign Credential question (29 lines)
      From: Adam Girard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:48:06 +0000
    • Re: Foreign Credential question (37 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 23:39:53 -0400
    • Re: Foreign Credential question (59 lines)
      From: Bev Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:14:37 -0230

49. Free for the cost of shipping -- cardboard LP mailers
    • Free for the cost of shipping -- cardboard LP mailers (18 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:53:31 -0400
    • Re: Free for the cost of shipping -- cardboard LP mailers (42 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:43:10 -0400
    • Re: Free for the cost of shipping -- cardboard LP mailers (29 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:56:25 -0400
    • Re: Free for the cost of shipping -- cardboard LP mailers (55 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:57:59 -0400
    • Re: Free for the cost of shipping -- cardboard LP mailers (28 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:12:58 -0700

50. Free PU
    • Free PU (22 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:25:15 -0400

51. Fw: WPAQ
    • Fw: WPAQ (62 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:17:51 -0400

52. Fw: [ARSCLIST] Best Software Noise Reduction Algorithms?
    • Fw: [ARSCLIST] Best Software Noise Reduction Algorithms? (67 lines)
      From: Mark Durenberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:59:53 -0500
    • Re: Fw: [ARSCLIST] Best Software Noise Reduction Algorithms? (83 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:08:00 -1000
    • Re: Fw: [ARSCLIST] Best Software Noise Reduction Algorithms? (107 lines)
      From: DSL FODA01 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:36:49 -0400

53. FW: [ARSCLIST] Reel-to-reel preservation supplies?
    • FW: [ARSCLIST] Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (81 lines)
      From: Luann Schneider <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:52:16 -0500
    • Re: FW: [ARSCLIST] Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (27 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:41:28 -0700
    • Re: FW: [ARSCLIST] Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (39 lines)
      From: Luann Schneider <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:58:50 -0500

54. Fw: [MLA-L] Looking for a word II
    • Fw: [MLA-L] Looking for a word II (56 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:57:41 -0400
    • Re: Fw: [MLA-L] Looking for a word II (41 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:51:20 -0500
    • Re: Fw: [MLA-L] Looking for a word II (28 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:16:18 -0400
    • Re: Fw: [MLA-L] Looking for a word II (26 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:35:01 -0700

55. fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle?
    • fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (315 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:33:07 -0400
    • Re: fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (341 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:50:59 -0400
    • Re: fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (47 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:48:53 -0400
    • Re: fwd: Everything Louder Than Everything Else : Have the loudness wars reached their final battle? (31 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:05:18 -0700

56. Fwd: Re: [ARSCLIST] Reel-to-reel preservation supplies?
    • Fwd: Re: [ARSCLIST] Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (115 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:48:16 -0400

57. fwd: What did the composer say to the cream of British pop?
    • fwd: What did the composer say to the cream of British pop? (68 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:31:20 -0400

58. Heath radio
    • Re: Heath radio (17 lines)
      From: JOHN HALL <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:47:30 -0500
    • Re: Heath radio (32 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:49:21 -0500

59. Help with 8mm film
    • Help with 8mm film (42 lines)
      From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:40:56 -0400
    • Re: Help with 8mm film (65 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:13:39 -0500
    • Re: Help with 8mm film (16 lines)
      From: Jeff Carroll <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 16:36:20 -0400
    • Re: Help with 8mm film (47 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 21:15:51 +0000
    • Re: Help with 8mm film (34 lines)
      From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 19:01:00 -0500
    • Re: Help with 8mm film (29 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:43:54 -0700
    • Re: Help with 8mm film (74 lines)
      From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:00:53 -0700

60. High Society
    • High Society (15 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 01:43:38 -0400

61. History Detectives
    • History Detectives (20 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 21:35:59 -0700
    • Re: History Detectives (22 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 00:14:17 -0500
    • Re: History Detectives (28 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 01:26:04 -0400
    • Re: History Detectives (56 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 07:26:59 -0400
    • Re: History Detectives (89 lines)
      From: Dr. Cheryl Thurber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 06:21:15 -0700
    • Re: History Detectives (128 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:51:19 -0500
    • Re: History Detectives (112 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:38:07 -0400
    • Re: History Detectives (146 lines)
      From: Bill Schurk <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 12:50:34 -0700

62. Information on Moroccan record labels
    • Information on Moroccan record labels (43 lines)
      From: Nick Patterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:04:03 -0400

63. Interesting story on NPR on what you fnd in mismarked tape boxes
    • Interesting story on NPR on what you fnd in mismarked tape boxes (21 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:32:50 EDT
    • Re: Interesting story on NPR on what you fnd in mismarked tape boxes (30 lines)
      From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:14:47 -0400
    • Re: Interesting story on NPR on what you fnd in mismarked tape boxes (41 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:48:06 -0700

64. Joe Glazer's death
    • Re: Joe Glazer's death (29 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:11:50 -0400
    • Re: Joe Glazer's death (28 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:45:39 EDT

65. Judaica Discography
    • Judaica Discography (149 lines)
      From: Dr. Rainer E. Lotz c/o Birgit Lotz Verlag <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 19:18:58 +0200

66. lacquer discs was [ARSCLIST] Comparable collections anywhere?
    • Re: lacquer discs was [ARSCLIST] Comparable collections anywhere? (26 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:27:54 -0400
    • Re: lacquer discs was [ARSCLIST] Comparable collections anywhere? (27 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:43:05 -0700
    • Re: lacquer discs was [ARSCLIST] Comparable collections anywhere? (42 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:32:36 +0200
    • Re: lacquer discs was [ARSCLIST] Comparable collections anywhere? (37 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:02:22 EDT
    • Re: lacquer discs was [ARSCLIST] Comparable collections anywhere? (40 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:20:14 -0700
    • Re: lacquer discs was [ARSCLIST] Comparable collections anywhere? (38 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:52:54 +0200
    • Re: lacquer discs was [ARSCLIST] Comparable collections anywhere? (49 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:35:56 -0400
    • Re: lacquer discs was [ARSCLIST] Comparable collections anywhere? (48 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:44:29 -0700

67. Libaries in the XXI Jahrhundert--was other stuff...
    • Libaries in the XXI Jahrhundert--was other stuff... (75 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 20:57:10 -0400
    • Re: Libaries in the XXI Jahrhundert--was other stuff... (53 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 06:43:32 -0400
    • Re: Libaries in the XXI Jahrhundert--was other stuff... (86 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 19:54:04 -0400

68. Looking for a word
    • Looking for a word (24 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:14:56 -0400
    • Re: Looking for a word (22 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:31:32 -0500
    • Re: Looking for a word (43 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:10:06 -0600
    • Re: Looking for a word (42 lines)
      From: Larry Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:24:27 -0400
    • Re: Looking for a word (54 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:32:08 -0700
    • Re: Looking for a word (31 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:48:59 EDT
    • Re: Looking for a word (25 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:17:29 -0700
    • Re: Looking for a word (30 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:23:23 -0700
    • Re: Looking for a word (46 lines)
      From: Larry Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:52:06 -0400
    • Re: Looking for a word (50 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:04:40 -0400
    • Re: Looking for a word (50 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:18:00 -0400
    • Re: Looking for a word (75 lines)
      From: Larry Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:20:21 -0400
    • Re: Looking for a word (65 lines)
      From: Larry Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:31:10 -0400
    • Re: Looking for a word (81 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:50:06 -0400
    • Re: Looking for a word (30 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:12:01 -0400
    • Re: Looking for a word (28 lines)
      From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:17:17 -0500
    • Re: Looking for a word (24 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:29:46 -0400
    • Re: Looking for a word (21 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:38:13 -0400
    • Re: Looking for a word (33 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:52:57 -0400
    • Re: Looking for a word (28 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:58:30 -0400

69. looking for Deed of Gift / Deposit Agreement documents
    • looking for Deed of Gift / Deposit Agreement documents (31 lines)
      From: Laura J. Ruede <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:03:53 -0400
    • Re: looking for Deed of Gift / Deposit Agreement documents (53 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:17:56 -0500

70. Lotz-Liste-23 ending soon
    • Lotz-Liste-23 ending soon (148 lines)
      From: Dr. Rainer E. Lotz c/o Birgit Lotz Verlag <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:59:21 +0200

71. MAGNA-REEL Sound Recording Tape
    • MAGNA-REEL Sound Recording Tape (26 lines)
      From: dave n <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:45:58 -0400
    • Re: MAGNA-REEL Sound Recording Tape (125 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:36:50 -0400
    • Re: MAGNA-REEL Sound Recording Tape (22 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:32:47 -0400
    • Re: MAGNA-REEL Sound Recording Tape (40 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:25:52 -0400
    • Re: MAGNA-REEL Sound Recording Tape (50 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:55:21 -0400
    • Re: MAGNA-REEL Sound Recording Tape (56 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:00:09 -0400
    • Re: MAGNA-REEL Sound Recording Tape (65 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:15:49 -0400
    • Re: MAGNA-REEL Sound Recording Tape (34 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 23:08:19 -0400
    • Re: MAGNA-REEL Sound Recording Tape (47 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 23:51:17 -0400
    • Re: MAGNA-REEL Sound Recording Tape (55 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:10:11 -0400
    • Re: MAGNA-REEL Sound Recording Tape (70 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:41:33 -0400
    • Re: MAGNA-REEL Sound Recording Tape (109 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:55:37 -0400
    • Re: MAGNA-REEL Sound Recording Tape (112 lines)
      From: Dave Nolan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:16:48 -0400
    • Re: MAGNA-REEL Sound Recording Tape (152 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:04:34 -0400
    • Re: MAGNA-REEL Sound Recording Tape (32 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:37:24 -0500

72. Majestic Records discography
    • Majestic Records discography (16 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 14:21:34 -0400
    • Re: Majestic Records discography (21 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 14:56:15 -0400
    • Re: Majestic Records discography (31 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 14:57:31 -0400
    • Re: Majestic Records discography (23 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 20:39:32 -0400
    • Re: Majestic Records discography (28 lines)
      From: Tyrone Settlemier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 20:03:08 -0500
    • Re: Majestic Records discography (41 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 07:44:58 -0400

73. Mellencamp
    • Re: Mellencamp (62 lines)
      From: Wasserman, Robert A - WHS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:21:20 -0500
    • Re: Mellencamp (81 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:55:24 -0400
    • Re: Mellencamp (105 lines)
      From: Wasserman, Robert A - WHS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:25:36 -0500
    • Re: Mellencamp (120 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 18:46:20 -0400
    • Re: Mellencamp (52 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 18:38:04 -0500
    • Re: Mellencamp (66 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:55:32 -0400
    • Re: Mellencamp (36 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 21:01:22 -0400
    • Re: Mellencamp (62 lines)
      From: Mike Loughlin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 09:57:29 -0400
    • Re: Mellencamp (87 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:37:51 -0500
    • Re: Mellencamp (32 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 14:24:31 -0600
    • Re: Mellencamp (88 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:55:33 -0400
    • Re: Mellencamp (114 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:08:33 -0400
    • Re: Mellencamp (99 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:19:54 -0700
    • Re: Mellencamp (28 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 08:42:01 -0500
    • Re: Mellencamp (27 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:19:09 -0400
    • Re: Mellencamp (30 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:59:34 -0500
    • Re: Mellencamp (52 lines)
      From: Wasserman, Robert A - WHS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:58:20 -0500
    • Re: Mellencamp (66 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:09:58 -0400
    • Re: Mellencamp (39 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:49:44 -0500
    • Re: Mellencamp (23 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:29:06 -0400
    • Re: Mellencamp (23 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:37:59 -0400
    • Re: Mellencamp (30 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:33:51 -0500
    • Re: Mellencamp (45 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:59:03 -0400

74. More about ET preservation (was "Comparable collections anywhere?")
    • More about ET preservation (was "Comparable collections anywhere?") (234 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:20:30 -0700
    • Re: More about ET preservation (was "Comparable collections anywhere?") (41 lines)
      From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:13:14 -0400

75. MP3 editor
    • MP3 editor (18 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:43:00 -0400

76. Naxos (was Re: [ARSCLIST] CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution...")
    • Naxos (was Re: [ARSCLIST] CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution...") (41 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:18:44 -0700

77. niche markets
    • Re: niche markets (121 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:33:53 -0400

78. Non-RIAA preamp
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (23 lines)
      From: Jeff Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 11:06:44 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (46 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 11:45:52 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (174 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 15:08:45 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (32 lines)
      From: Konrad Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:11:02 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (46 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:56:16 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (38 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:51:03 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (31 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:53:13 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (54 lines)
      From: Jeff Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 02:46:28 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (62 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 06:48:37 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (41 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 09:53:21 EDT
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (33 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:56:32 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (43 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 22:23:02 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 22:51:38 EDT
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (43 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 23:42:54 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (40 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 08:38:07 -0700
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (58 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:23:43 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (38 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:04:33 -0500
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (61 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:01:49 -0500
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (40 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:25:01 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (55 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:46:45 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (67 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:46:05 -0500
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (29 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:08:48 -0500
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (35 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 23:10:33 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (109 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:01:30 -0500
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (56 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:30:39 +0000
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (45 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:15:03 -0500
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (44 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:21:06 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (38 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 07:23:46 -0700
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (26 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:33:32 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (41 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:40:20 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (50 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 18:43:30 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (31 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 18:47:39 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (119 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:13:46 -0700
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (192 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:20:34 +0200
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (39 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:01:22 +0200
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (49 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:12:45 -0700
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (100 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:55:13 +0200

79. Of Discographic Interest
    • Of Discographic Interest (22 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:24:26 -0500
    • Re: Of Discographic Interest (29 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 08:11:57 -0700
    • Re: Of Discographic Interest (46 lines)
      From: Larry Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:50:37 -0400
    • Re: Of Discographic Interest (26 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:14:00 -0400
    • Re: Of Discographic Interest (57 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:39:26 -0500
    • Re: Of Discographic Interest (33 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:18:19 -0700
    • Re: Of Discographic Interest (37 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:59:44 -0400
    • Re: Of Discographic Interest (24 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:30:37 -0500

80. Off Line
    • Re: Off Line (16 lines)
      From: Jack Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 02:43:25 -0400
    • Re: Off Line (24 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 20:30:45 -0400

81. On the beaten 8-track...
    • On the beaten 8-track... (31 lines)
      From: Rob Bamberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:45:32 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (42 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:02:08 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (63 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:35:14 -0500
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (55 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:40:26 -0600
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (64 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:45:38 -0700
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (138 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:55:30 -0500
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (70 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:06:44 -0500
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (73 lines)
      From: Wasserman, Robert A - WHS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:07:57 -0500
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (186 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:05:43 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (68 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:46:18 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (93 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:06:11 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (190 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:14:15 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (22 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:29:14 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (23 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:34:49 -0500
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (56 lines)
      From: Rob Bamberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:32:36 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (76 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:07:40 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (33 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:20:24 -0700
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (48 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:57:38 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (58 lines)
      From: Wasserman, Robert A - WHS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:21:22 -0500
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (20 lines)
      From: Ron Fial <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:42:36 -0700
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (36 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:21:25 -0700
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (44 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:28:25 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (53 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:51:26 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (26 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:27:32 -0700
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (17 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:31:16 EDT
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (24 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:30:31 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (49 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:38:04 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (63 lines)
      From: Mark Durenberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:06:55 -0500
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (25 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:41:18 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (27 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:01:25 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (24 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:24:08 +0000
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (19 lines)
      From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:09:45 -0400
    • Re: On the beaten 8-track... (31 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:21:32 -0400

82. Overtone Records
    • Re: Overtone Records (25 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 11:20:09 EDT

83. Oxford Publication 1954
    • Oxford Publication 1954 (26 lines)
      From: Francesco Martinelli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:13:48 +0200

84. Paper cuts * going all -digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ]
    • Re: Paper cuts * going all -digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ] (63 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 08:58:18 -0400
    • Re: Paper cuts * going all -digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ] (50 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:19:21 -0700
    • Re: Paper cuts * going all -digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ] (60 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:09:26 -0400
    • Re: Paper cuts * going all -digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ] (40 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:00:44 -0700
    • Re: Paper cuts * going all -digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ] (31 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:43:28 +0000
    • Re: Paper cuts * going all -digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ] (40 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 08:50:52 -0400
    • Re: Paper cuts * going all -digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ] (25 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 22:33:44 -0400

85. Paper cuts – going all-digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ]
    • Re: Paper cuts – going all-digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ] (34 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 20:55:38 +0000

86. Paper cuts – going all-digital sti ll not popular [Re: Preservation ]
    • Re: Paper cuts – going all-digital sti ll not popular [Re: Preservation ] (54 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 22:45:35 -0400

87. Paper cuts – going all-digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ]
    • Paper cuts – going all-digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ] (23 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 10:20:43 EDT
    • Re: Paper cuts – going all-digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ] (57 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 11:07:00 -0700

88. Perfect 78s (was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"?)
    • Perfect 78s (was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"?) (52 lines)
      From: LeRoy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:08:03 -0600
    • Re: Perfect 78s (was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"?) (69 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:41:01 -0400

89. Preservation in the "digital" age of the 1990s
    • Preservation in the "digital" age of the 1990s (20 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:53:04 -0500

90. Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-)
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (44 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 11:03:15 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (37 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 08:30:17 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (90 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:54:18 +0200
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (23 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 12:38:04 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (118 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 12:45:16 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (31 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 11:11:33 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (39 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 14:21:01 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (41 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 12:24:29 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (91 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 18:34:15 +0000
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (65 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 18:43:03 +0000
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (49 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 19:47:51 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (90 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 20:07:28 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (133 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 20:20:11 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (44 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:32:38 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (52 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 20:44:21 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (89 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 20:59:30 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (36 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 21:09:02 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (35 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 21:29:16 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (124 lines)
      From: Mark Durenberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 21:05:41 -0500
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (80 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 21:50:34 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (41 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 06:49:55 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (129 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 06:55:50 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (42 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 07:09:58 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (119 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 07:16:04 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (63 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 07:31:21 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (34 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 05:22:45 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (63 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 05:35:43 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (75 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 08:55:19 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (27 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 09:46:24 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (57 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 10:04:17 EDT
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (20 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 10:14:17 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (57 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 11:55:18 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (43 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 09:24:54 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (53 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 09:48:54 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (34 lines)
      From: seva <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 13:00:59 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (39 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 11:12:18 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (48 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 11:30:07 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (51 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 13:08:12 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (64 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 17:52:07 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (72 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 17:17:07 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (53 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 20:22:47 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (72 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 17:22:03 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (39 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 21:37:37 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (24 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 21:49:49 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (61 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 21:57:11 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (32 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 22:14:55 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (41 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 19:20:33 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (34 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 22:55:34 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (50 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 23:39:22 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (63 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 23:52:40 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (46 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 21:06:14 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (39 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 00:38:00 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (36 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 23:21:15 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (76 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 11:38:39 +0000
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (49 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 11:40:55 +0000
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (22 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 07:50:17 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (24 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:00:16 EDT
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (36 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:10:45 EDT
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (35 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:14:56 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (35 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 08:16:15 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (55 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:20:14 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (33 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:41:52 +0000
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (46 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:42:56 +0000
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (28 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 19:05:09 EDT
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (29 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 20:22:40 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (38 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:08:15 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (48 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 17:23:34 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (55 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:40:00 -1000
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (49 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:48:51 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (64 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:17:58 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (63 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:16:02 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (45 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:26:18 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (68 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:28:13 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (28 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 16:02:56 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (92 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:14:26 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (97 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:34:24 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (81 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:36:45 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (30 lines)
      From: Mark Durenberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:40:20 -0500
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (105 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:46:39 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (22 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:49:40 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (54 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:51:54 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (38 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:48:14 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (55 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:02:13 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (149 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:05:42 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (44 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:14:15 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (62 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:33:42 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (25 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:59:53 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (95 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 21:22:15 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (54 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 22:20:17 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (25 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 22:30:27 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (38 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 11:12:20 +0000
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (41 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:44:22 +0000
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (53 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:27:00 -0500
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (76 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:52:59 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (90 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 11:16:16 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (30 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 11:25:53 -0700
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (35 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:41:44 -0500
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (57 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:37:43 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (134 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:55:06 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 18:31:30 EDT
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (37 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:28:58 +0000
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (60 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 07:37:33 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (89 lines)
      From: Russell W. Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:32:20 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (111 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 22:01:13 -0400
    • Re: Preservation media WAS: Cataloguing still :-) (48 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 14:31:57 +0000

91. Preserving the sound
    • Preserving the sound (21 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 01:39:11 -0400
    • Re: Preserving the sound (34 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:36:07 -0400

92. Programmable varispeed question
    • Programmable varispeed question (39 lines)
      From: Henry Clark <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:41:16 +0000
    • Re: Programmable varispeed question (55 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:30:16 -0400
    • Re: Programmable varispeed question (34 lines)
      From: Henry Clark <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:01:20 +0000
    • Re: Programmable varispeed question (55 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:44:04 -0400
    • Re: Programmable varispeed question (22 lines)
      From: Aaron Z Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:17:34 -0400
    • Re: Programmable varispeed question (41 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:30:43 -0700
    • Re: Programmable varispeed question (53 lines)
      From: Alec McLane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:07:23 -0400
    • Re: Programmable varispeed question (32 lines)
      From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:20:38 -0400

93. RE : [ARSCLIST] Help with 8mm film
    • RE : [ARSCLIST] Help with 8mm film (89 lines)
      From: Andre Pion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:50:32 -0400
    • Re: RE : [ARSCLIST] Help with 8mm film (34 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:13:16 -0700

94. RealAudio to WAV
    • RealAudio to WAV (27 lines)
      From: Dave Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:29:47 -0400
    • Re: RealAudio to WAV (53 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:48:33 -0400
    • Re: RealAudio to WAV (39 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 07:12:43 -0700
    • Re: RealAudio to WAV (29 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:22:43 -0400
    • Re: RealAudio to WAV (20 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:25:06 -0400
    • Re: RealAudio to WAV (35 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 08:18:58 -0700
    • Re: RealAudio to WAV (46 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:16:05 -0500
    • Re: RealAudio to WAV (27 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 22:40:49 -0400

95. Recorder needed
    • Recorder needed (49 lines)
      From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:39:40 -0500
    • Re: Recorder needed (56 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:42:20 -0400
    • Re: Recorder needed (74 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:22:00 -0400
    • Re: Recorder needed (91 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:39:30 -0500
    • Re: Recorder needed (101 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:53:39 -0400
    • Re: Recorder needed (117 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:15:49 -0500
    • Re: Recorder needed (41 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:22:19 -0400

96. Reel-to-reel preservation supplies?
    • Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (47 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:04:45 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (63 lines)
      From: Luann Schneider <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:46:10 -0500
    • Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (34 lines)
      From: Andre Pion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:08:04 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (63 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:33:28 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (26 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:51:09 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (59 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:03:35 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (35 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:21:18 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (71 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:30:10 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (31 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:36:43 -0400
    • Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (69 lines)
      From: Marlan Green <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:06:10 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (96 lines)
      From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:51:31 -0700
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (21 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:53:13 -0700
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (33 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:20:32 -0700
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (33 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:30:35 -0700
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (35 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:19:24 -0700
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (51 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:26:03 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (46 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:14:18 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (57 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:24:44 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (103 lines)
      From: Geeta Jatania <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:48:05 +1000
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (64 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:25:15 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (50 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:59:58 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (71 lines)
      From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:04:17 -0700
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (39 lines)
      From: Christie Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:35:17 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (59 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:28:44 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (84 lines)
      From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:54:03 -0700
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (94 lines)
      From: Ross Fuqua <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:16:59 -0700
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (25 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:04:42 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (54 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:49:06 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (41 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:18:22 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (95 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:53:02 -0700
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (27 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:13:58 -0700
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (31 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:31:28 -0700
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (27 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:49:01 -0700
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (44 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:04:42 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (29 lines)
      From: Graeme Jaye <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:18:42 +0200
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (27 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:05:09 -0700
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (27 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:01:16 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (29 lines)
      From: Mark Durenberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:24:10 -0500
    • Re: Reel-to-reel preservation supplies? (43 lines)
      From: Mark Durenberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:27:30 -0500

97. Registry of Digital Masters
    • Registry of Digital Masters (25 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:59:56 -0400
    • Re: Registry of Digital Masters (49 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:29:30 -0400
    • Re: Registry of Digital Masters (89 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:22:49 -0500
    • Re: Registry of Digital Masters (120 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:34:43 -0400
    • Re: Registry of Digital Masters (37 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:44:08 -0500
    • Re: Registry of Digital Masters (28 lines)
      From: Language Archives <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:28:54 -0500
    • Re: Registry of Digital Masters (92 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:39:04 -0400
    • Re: Registry of Digital Masters (110 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:27:16 -0400
    • Re: Registry of Digital Masters (128 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:55:52 -0500

98. replying to list, was [ARSCLIST] Help with 8mm film
    • Re: replying to list, was [ARSCLIST] Help with 8mm film (22 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 20:15:11 -0400

99. Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire
    • Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (30 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:41:41 -0400
    • Re: Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (23 lines)
      From: Michael Fitzgerald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:12:32 -0400
    • Re: Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (34 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:55:26 -0400
    • Re: Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (19 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 18:16:08 -0400
    • Re: Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (91 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 18:58:58 -0400
    • Re: Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (38 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:55:30 -0400
    • Re: Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (24 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:47:11 -0400
    • Re: Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (44 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:38:38 -0400
    • Re: Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (71 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:00:56 -0400
    • Re: Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (43 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:20:49 -0400
    • Re: Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (59 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:46:50 -0400
    • Re: Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (23 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:13:14 -0400
    • Re: Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (20 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:27:06 -0400
    • Re: Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (50 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:57:43 +0000

100. Ringtones, etc.
     • Ringtones, etc. (28 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:37:10 -0400
     • Re: Ringtones, etc. (48 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:04:08 -0500
     • Re: Ringtones, etc. (25 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:36:37 EDT
     • Re: Ringtones, etc. (51 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:59:59 -0400
     • Re: Ringtones, etc. (64 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:03:25 -0400
     • Re: Ringtones, etc. (80 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:18:34 -0400
     • Re: Ringtones, etc. (109 lines)
       From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:29:33 -0700
     • Re: Ringtones, etc. (49 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:09:27 -0400
     • Re: Ringtones, etc. (30 lines)
       From: Jonathan Wise <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:35:53 -0400

101. September issue of Black Grooves
     • September issue of Black Grooves (39 lines)
       From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 11:12:49 -0400

102. Some advice on cassette decks?
     • Re: Some advice on cassette decks? (38 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 05:40:18 -0700
     • Re: Some advice on cassette decks? (175 lines)
       From: Craig Breaden <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 09:07:28 -0400
     • Re: Some advice on cassette decks? (54 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 12:56:00 -0400

103. Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"?
     • Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (71 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:35:13 -0400
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (60 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:14:34 -0500
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (27 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:22:41 -0400
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (16 lines)
       From: JOHN HALL <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:01:53 -0500
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (18 lines)
       From: JOHN HALL <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:12:33 -0500
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (37 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:42:50 -0500
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (67 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:27:11 -0400
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (26 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:36:41 -0500
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (48 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:48:47 -0500
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (37 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:49:03 +0000
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (83 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:17:27 -0400
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (48 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:02:25 -0400
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (26 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:21:51 -0400
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (42 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:36:27 -0500
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (42 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:26:28 +0000
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (27 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:48:09 -0400
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (40 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:54:30 -0400
     • Re: Sound--real vs. recorded--was: discography of "direct-to-disk revival"? (41 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:21:04 -0500

104. sticky goop on a CD container
     • sticky goop on a CD container (19 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:00:34 -0400
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (41 lines)
       From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:39:21 -0600
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (47 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:44:35 -0400
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (37 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:56:26 -0700
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (21 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:15:31 -0400
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (44 lines)
       From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:03:48 -0700
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (38 lines)
       From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:12:22 -0400
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (48 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:20:30 -0400
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (54 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:33:07 -0400
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (80 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:47:26 -0400
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (112 lines)
       From: David Hamiton <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:00:59 -0400
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (115 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:11:04 -0400
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (127 lines)
       From: Dr. Cheryl Thurber <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:11:38 -0700
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (130 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:41:01 -0400
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (129 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:42:54 -0400
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (25 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:11:31 -0400
     • Re: sticky goop on a CD container (38 lines)
       From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:54:55 -0400

105. Stinson 10" LP's
     • Stinson 10" LP's (36 lines)
       From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:41:41 -0400

106. Storage on CD
     • Storage on CD (26 lines)
       From: Tommy Sjöberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 13:57:57 +0200

107. Storyville, Dixie Frog
     • Storyville, Dixie Frog (20 lines)
       From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:13:09 -0400

108. Technics SL-D2 turntable -- can it be modified for 78RPM
     • Technics SL-D2 turntable -- can it be modified for 78RPM (29 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 11:19:19 -0400

109. The Wagner 'archive'
     • The Wagner 'archive' (21 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:35:19 -0700

110. This Week's eBay stuff
     • This Week's eBay stuff (29 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 12:53:29 -0400

111. This week's listings- THE ADDRESS
     • This week's listings- THE ADDRESS (14 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 12:55:06 -0400

112. u-matic tape deck
     • u-matic tape deck (17 lines)
       From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:05:39 -0400

113. Underscore in file names
     • Underscore in file names (19 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 16:56:47 -0400
     • Re: Underscore in file names (39 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:09:25 -0400
     • Re: Underscore in file names (46 lines)
       From: Terry, Kopana <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:25:46 -0400
     • Re: Underscore in file names (33 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 14:41:40 -0700
     • Re: Underscore in file names (48 lines)
       From: Alex Hartov <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:49:10 -0400
     • Re: Underscore in file names (63 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:04:45 -0400
     • Re: Underscore in file names (33 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 23:30:21 +0000
     • Re: Underscore in file names (37 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:37:59 -0700
     • Re: Underscore in file names (36 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 20:57:48 -0400
     • Re: Underscore in file names (36 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:11:33 -0700
     • Re: Underscore in file names (32 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:37:09 -0700
     • Re: Underscore in file names (33 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:40:03 -0700
     • Re: Underscore in file names (40 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 22:41:59 -0400
     • Re: Underscore in file names (40 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 22:53:27 -0400
     • Re: Underscore in file names (45 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 23:02:32 -0400
     • Re: Underscore in file names (44 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 20:19:30 -0700
     • Re: Underscore in file names (37 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 00:17:08 -0400
     • Re: Underscore in file names (44 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 12:15:12 +0000
     • Re: Underscore in file names (35 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 12:12:00 +0000
     • Re: Underscore in file names (28 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:44:35 -0700
     • Re: Underscore in file names (31 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:46:33 +0000
     • Re: Underscore in file names (62 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 06:48:51 -0400
     • Re: Underscore in file names (79 lines)
       From: Daniel G. Epstein <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:40:22 -0500
     • Re: Underscore in file names (55 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:00:56 -0700
     • Re: Underscore in file names (61 lines)
       From: Daniel G. Epstein <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:11:43 -0500
     • Re: Underscore in file names (75 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 22:29:54 -0400
     • Re: Underscore in file names (28 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 10:26:16 -0700

114. Unesco report
     • Unesco report (22 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:06:20 -0500

115. unknown artists and archives
     • unknown artists and archives (34 lines)
       From: Matthew Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:32:56 -0400
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (89 lines)
       From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:10:18 -0400
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (57 lines)
       From: Matthew Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:47:29 -0400
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (81 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:22:23 -0400
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (128 lines)
       From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:58:15 -0400
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (142 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:17:35 -0400
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (88 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:50:15 -0400
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (105 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:19:44 -0400
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (129 lines)
       From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:50:39 -0400
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (57 lines)
       From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:05:35 -0700
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (28 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:33:02 -0500
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (43 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:56:22 -0400
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (39 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:25:09 -0700
     • Re: unknown artists and archives (38 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:40:09 +0000

116. URL for eBay auction.
     • URL for eBay auction. (21 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:46:16 -0400

117. Was Registry of Digital Masters now, more about organization of information
     • Was Registry of Digital Masters now, more about organization of information (53 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:05:59 -0500
     • Re: Was Registry of Digital Masters now, more about organization of information (59 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:10:26 -0700
     • Re: Was Registry of Digital Masters now, more about organization of information (71 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:14:48 +0000

118. Weingartner mystery
     • Weingartner mystery (17 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 09:49:52 -0400
     • Re: Weingartner mystery (40 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:41:26 -0400
     • Re: Weingartner mystery (43 lines)
       From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 15:35:01 -0400
     • Re: Weingartner mystery (24 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:40:40 -0400
     • Re: Weingartner mystery (34 lines)
       From: Russell W. Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:42:10 -0400
     • Re: Weingartner mystery (46 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 22:23:37 -0400
     • Re: Weingartner mystery (69 lines)
       From: David Hamiton <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 07:31:52 -0400
     • Re: Weingartner mystery (75 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 09:50:39 -0400

119. Wendy Carlos was Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire
     • Re: Wendy Carlos was Request for info: Columbia Studio/Warehouse Fire (83 lines)
       From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:17:20 -0400

120. XERF
     • Re: XERF (55 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 21:46:14 -0500
     • Re: XERF (36 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 08:29:50 -0500
     • Re: XERF (50 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 21:45:22 -0500

121. XERF--was: lacquer discs was [ARSCLIST] Comparable collections anywhere?
     • XERF--was: lacquer discs was [ARSCLIST] Comparable collections anywhere? (37 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 21:19:57 -0400

122. ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (108 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 23:35:40 -0400
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (133 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 23:11:05 -0500
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (26 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:13:39 -0400
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (56 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 18:32:47 -0400
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (45 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:10:31 -0400
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (42 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:33:21 -0500
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (26 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:04:43 -0400
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (69 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:03:56 -0400
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (46 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:48:18 -0400
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (26 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:12:14 -0400
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (41 lines)
       From: Jack Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:45:53 -0400
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (58 lines)
       From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:37:53 -0700
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (32 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:29:25 -0700
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (38 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:14:49 +0000
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (32 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:30:14 +0000
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (32 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:25:09 -0500
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (24 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:31:33 EDT
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (40 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:55:16 -0500
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (27 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:03:25 -0500
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (29 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:00:51 -0500
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (17 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:23:45 -0400
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (26 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:19:58 -0500
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (49 lines)
       From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:09:34 -0700
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (19 lines)
       From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:26:38 -0700
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (23 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:15:34 -0400
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (18 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:18:04 -0400
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (25 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:44:12 -0500
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (36 lines)
       From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:58:03 -0700
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (36 lines)
       From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:16:31 -0700
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (40 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:51:59 -0400
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (53 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 19:12:56 -0400
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (37 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:20:10 -0400
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (26 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:22:48 -0400
     • Re: ^ Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (31 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:14:05 -0700

123. ^ Looking for a word
     • Re: ^ Looking for a word (28 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:54:00 -0400
     • Re: ^ Looking for a word (23 lines)
       From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:55:02 -0500
     • Re: ^ Looking for a word (29 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:24:42 -0400
     • Re: ^ Looking for a word (22 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:36:46 -0500
     • Re: ^ Looking for a word (29 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:06:59 -0700
     • Re: ^ Looking for a word (33 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:13:40 -0700
     • Re: ^ Looking for a word (53 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:21:48 -0400
     • Re: ^ Looking for a word (34 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 23:28:06 -0400

124. ^ sticky goop on a CD container
     • Re: ^ sticky goop on a CD container (29 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:37:13 -0400
     • Re: ^ sticky goop on a CD container (40 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:41:52 -0400

125. ^CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..."
     • Re: ^CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (26 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:04:51 EDT
     • Re: ^CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (36 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:49:59 -0700
     • Re: ^CD versus Download was "All hail the analogue revolution..." (33 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:07:58 -0400

126. ^Dylan (was Mellencamp)
     • Re: ^Dylan (was Mellencamp) (25 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 15:04:44 EDT