ARSCLIST Archives – August 2006

1. "Who Are You People?"
   • "Who Are You People?" (34 lines)
     From: susannah cleveland <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:32:39 -0400

2. ..and in this week's eBay listings, we have...
   • ..and in this week's eBay listings, we have... (23 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:55:28 -0400

3. .BWF implementation
   • .BWF implementation (22 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:19:04 -0400
   • Re: .BWF implementation (72 lines)
     From: Casey, Michael T <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:31:20 -0400
   • Re: .BWF implementation (23 lines)
     From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:28:01 -0400
   • Re: .BWF implementation (33 lines)
     From: andy kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:49:29 -0400
   • Re: .BWF implementation (58 lines)
     From: Casey, Michael T <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:25:29 -0400
   • Re: .BWF implementation (45 lines)
     From: andy kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:06:50 -0400
   • Re: .BWF implementation (31 lines)
     From: Graeme Jaye <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 23:38:54 +0200
   • .BWF implementation (24 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 09:18:44 -0400
   • Re: .BWF implementation (70 lines)
     From: seva <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:06:52 -0400
   • Re: .BWF implementation (22 lines)
     From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:12:21 -0400
   • Re: .BWF implementation (65 lines)
     From: Konrad Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:18:03 -0400
   • Re: .BWF implementation (54 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:46:32 -0400
   • Re: .BWF implementation (21 lines)
     From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:11:51 -0400
   • Re: .BWF implementation (43 lines)
     From: seva <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:21:16 -0400
   • Re: .BWF implementation (37 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:14:28 -0400
   • Re: .BWF implementation (29 lines)
     From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:29:46 -0400

4. 2 GB file limit
   • 2 GB file limit (47 lines)
     From: Konrad Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:59:16 -0400
   • Re: 2 GB file limit (45 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 17:09:04 -0400
   • Re: 2 GB file limit (30 lines)
     From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 23:22:18 -0400
   • Re: 2 GB file limit (74 lines)
     From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:08:05 -0700
   • Re: 2 GB file limit (38 lines)
     From: Konrad Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:26:22 -0400
   • Re: 2 GB file limit (62 lines)
     From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:22:02 -0700

5. 2007 ARSC Conference: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
   • 2007 ARSC Conference: Milwaukee, Wisconsin (56 lines)
     From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:01:46 -0400

6. 3M 996
   • 3M 996 (19 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 22:24:07 -0400
   • Re: 3M 996 (38 lines)
     From: John Bondurant <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:13:54 -0400

7. 5" discs more hardy than some think
   • Re: 5" discs more hardy than some think (51 lines)
     From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:38:17 +0200

8. 5" discs more hearty than some think
   • Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think (30 lines)
     From: Trey Bunn <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 08:36:23 -0500
   • Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think (32 lines)
     From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 07:29:39 -0700
   • Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think (41 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 13:23:27 -0400
   • Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think (55 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:26:14 -0400
   • Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think (33 lines)
     From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:34:14 -0700
   • Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think (31 lines)
     From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:43:09 -0700
   • Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think (31 lines)
     From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:52:14 -0700
   • Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think (87 lines)
     From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:59:41 -0700
   • Re: 5" discs more hearty than some think (138 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:43:16 -0400

9. 78s on eBay
   • 78s on eBay (23 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:32:37 -0400
   • Re: 78s on eBay (27 lines)
     From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 05:42:08 -0700

10. Advice on cassette decks?
    • Advice on cassette decks? (35 lines)
      From: Craig Breaden <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:40:45 -0400
    • Re: Advice on cassette decks? (33 lines)
      From: Tommy Sjöberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:54:17 +0200
    • Re: Advice on cassette decks? (65 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:02:11 -0500
    • Re: Advice on cassette decks? (39 lines)
      From: Steve Weiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:52:20 -0400
    • Re: Advice on cassette decks? (39 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:35:07 +0200
    • Re: Advice on cassette decks? (51 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:09:58 -0400
    • Re: Advice on cassette decks? (43 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:43:07 -0500
    • Re: Advice on cassette decks? (58 lines)
      From: Gary <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:31:26 -0700
    • Re: Advice on cassette decks? (67 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:14:44 -0500
    • Re: Advice on cassette decks? (76 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:19:01 -0500

11. Advice on how to get the list in digest form?
    • Advice on how to get the list in digest form? (15 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:01:24 EDT

12. Aol discs (was Podcasting)
    • Re: Aol discs (was Podcasting) (21 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:08:20 -0400

13. Apologies for wrong auction links
    • Apologies for wrong auction links (35 lines)
      From: Dr. Rainer E. Lotz c/o Birgit Lotz Verlag <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:56:16 +0200

14. Archiving and Reformatting Digital Files
    • Archiving and Reformatting Digital Files (55 lines)
      From: McCormick, Kathleen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:07:19 -0400
    • Re: Archiving and Reformatting Digital Files (49 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:42:15 -0700
    • Re: Archiving and Reformatting Digital Files (74 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:12:11 -0400
    • Re: Archiving and Reformatting Digital Files (88 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:16:34 -0400

15. ARSC Awards Finalists 2006
    • ARSC Awards Finalists 2006 (169 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 22:24:47 -0400

16. ARSC Preservation Grants: The First Awards
    • ARSC Preservation Grants: The First Awards (55 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:56:07 -0400

17. Article on Glenn Gould Archive and Forgery in today's WSJ
    • Article on Glenn Gould Archive and Forgery in today's WSJ (205 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:02:32 EDT

18. Audio for "free," but first a word from our sponsor...
    • Audio for "free," but first a word from our sponsor... (18 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:34:24 -0500

19. Backward turntables?
    • Backward turntables? (41 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:08:37 -0400
    • Re: Backward turntables? (50 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:26:22 -0400
    • Re: Backward turntables? (59 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:02:58 -0400
    • Re: Backward turntables? (23 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:03:37 -0400
    • Re: Backward turntables? (23 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:04:33 -0400
    • Re: Backward turntables? (60 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:44:18 -0400
    • Re: Backward turntables? (32 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:28:05 -0700
    • Re: Backward turntables? (36 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:07:44 -0500
    • Re: Backward turntables? (32 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:18:44 -0700
    • Re: Backward turntables? (26 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:31:44 -0500
    • Re: Backward turntables? (24 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:14:03 -0400
    • Re: Backward turntables? (33 lines)
      From: Graeme Jaye <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:01:33 +0200

20. Beginner's question RE: digital recordings
    • Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (45 lines)
      From: Lisa NnNnNn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:17:43 -0500
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (39 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:50:39 -0400
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (65 lines)
      From: Lisa NnNnNn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:03:43 -0500
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (43 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:00:15 +0200
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (60 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:16:03 -0400
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (70 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:52:42 -0700
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (75 lines)
      From: Lisa NnNnNn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:07:17 -0500
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (101 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:39:31 -0400
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (118 lines)
      From: Lisa NnNnNn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:13:46 -0500
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (56 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:14:47 -1000
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (82 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:26:17 -0400
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (112 lines)
      From: Lisa NnNnNn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:57:35 -0500
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (80 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:35:18 -1000
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (102 lines)
      From: Lisa NnNnNn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:46:18 -0500
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (126 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:07:18 -1000
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (144 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:26:21 -0400
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (123 lines)
      From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:39:46 -0700
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (142 lines)
      From: Lisa NnNnNn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:41:38 -0500
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (165 lines)
      From: Mark Durenberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:54:53 -0500
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (96 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:57:37 -0400
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (31 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 22:16:58 +0000
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (41 lines)
      From: Edward Falk <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:32:43 -0700
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (58 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:38:03 -1000
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (58 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:51:19 -1000
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (146 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:22:59 -0400
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (72 lines)
      From: Lisa NnNnNn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:44:10 -0500
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (181 lines)
      From: Lisa NnNnNn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:47:58 -0500
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (29 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:54:25 -0500
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (38 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:08:06 -0400
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (43 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:14:14 -0400
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (24 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:17:16 EDT
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (133 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:47:03 -0500
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (34 lines)
      From: Edward Falk <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:07:35 -0700
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (27 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:19:58 -0400
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (51 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:23:51 -0400
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (46 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:39:51 -0400
    • Re: Beginner's question RE: digital recordings (66 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:20:44 -0500

21. Bing v. Enrico--was: Podcasting--explained a bit...
    • Bing v. Enrico--was: Podcasting--explained a bit... (30 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:29:34 -0400
    • Re: Bing v. Enrico--was: Podcasting--explained a bit... (40 lines)
      From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:59:13 +0200

22. Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (72 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:29:43 -0400
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (44 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:36:57 -0700
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (59 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:00:20 -0500
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (48 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:04:43 -0700
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (56 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:16:47 -0500
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (76 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:52:19 +0200
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (39 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:01:13 EDT
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (59 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:41:28 -0400
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (58 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:05:05 -0400
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (43 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:24:39 -0700
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (77 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:42:00 -0400
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (59 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:51:24 -0500
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (34 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:06:20 -0700
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (35 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:12:52 -0700
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (51 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:31:49 -0400
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (44 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:59:31 -0700
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (36 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:13:18 +0000
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (67 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:01:59 -0700
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (86 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:17:25 -0400
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (34 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:53:56 -0400
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (24 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:27:50 -0700
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (25 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:27:36 -0400
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (27 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:01:16 -0400
    • Re: Cables- was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (39 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:40:25 -0400

23. Can 78s sound better than LPs?
    • Can 78s sound better than LPs? (25 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:05:23 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (37 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:39:25 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (78 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:44:57 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (63 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:47:37 +0200
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (64 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:47:00 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (57 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:54:36 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (27 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:00:15 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (23 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:13:44 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (38 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:19:17 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:29:00 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (83 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:54:50 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (44 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:32:50 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (85 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:49:30 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (35 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:18:38 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (57 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:39:03 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (60 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:56:21 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (41 lines)
      From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:20:10 +0200
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (28 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:32:17 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (63 lines)
      From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:33:27 +0200
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (31 lines)
      From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:34:58 -0500
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (31 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:42:35 EDT
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (83 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:52:15 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (38 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:50:48 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (46 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:20:20 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (38 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:34:35 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (52 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:04:49 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (29 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:22:55 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (60 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:36:40 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (75 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:45:22 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (69 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:43:29 +0000
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (32 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 09:15:33 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (53 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:33:22 +0200
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (18 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:18:14 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (81 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 08:29:52 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (82 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:50:51 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (49 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:15:52 -0500
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (35 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:23:24 -0500
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (67 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:23:30 -0500
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (27 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:25:49 -0500
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (100 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:30:03 -0500
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (102 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:31:43 -0500
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (39 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:37:52 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (120 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:58:50 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (37 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:38:16 +0200
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (44 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:30:16 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (84 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:46:00 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (27 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:01:48 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (51 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:22:52 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (25 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:45:46 EDT
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (27 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:30:23 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (29 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:31:34 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (26 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:33:30 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (47 lines)
      From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:45:17 -0500
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (30 lines)
      From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:51:15 -0500
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (24 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:05:06 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (28 lines)
      From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:40:21 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (34 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:16:35 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (29 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:24:52 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (37 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:50:03 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (77 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:35:49 +0000
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (42 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 19:46:56 +0000
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (56 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:03:13 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (74 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:22:16 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (107 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:38:12 -0500
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (39 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 08:54:11 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (27 lines)
      From: MD at Upsala <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:45:12 -0500
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (68 lines)
      From: MD at Upsala <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:46:55 -0500
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (94 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:39:30 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (58 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:01:08 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (128 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:17:04 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (47 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:13:19 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (34 lines)
      From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:04:52 +0200
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (38 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:28:39 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (41 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:54:31 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (52 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:41:36 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (24 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:45:20 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (36 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:03:58 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (24 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:11:56 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (60 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 02:08:41 +0200
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (65 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:08:28 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (33 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:49:18 -0500
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (27 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:02:57 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (29 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:02:00 -0500
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (58 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:23:01 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (48 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:03:06 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (72 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:21:50 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (55 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:07:46 -0500
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (45 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 02:48:11 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (62 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:55:52 -0500
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (40 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 08:33:03 +0000
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (41 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 08:38:22 +0000
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (34 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:40:18 +0000
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (29 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:31:29 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (30 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:58:35 -0400
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (29 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:26:11 -0700
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (38 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:22:41 +0000
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (38 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:05:56 +0000
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (48 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:18:18 +0000
    • Re: Can 78s sound better than LPs? (28 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:46:32 -0700

24. Can anybody identhify this odd little piece?
    • Can anybody identhify this odd little piece? (18 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 11:45:54 -0700
    • Re: Can anybody identhify this odd little piece? (31 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:27:44 -0400

25. Cassette playback (was Can 78s sound better than LPs?)
    • Re: Cassette playback (was Can 78s sound better than LPs?) (101 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:52:42 -0400
    • Re: Cassette playback (was Can 78s sound better than LPs?) (27 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 09:52:03 -0700

26. Cassette speeds, was Can 78s sound better than LPs?
    • Re: Cassette speeds, was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (60 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:22:14 -0400
    • Re: Cassette speeds, was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (30 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:00:13 -0700
    • Re: Cassette speeds, was Can 78s sound better than LPs? (36 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:40:25 -0700

27. Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?
    • Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (77 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:58:26 -0400
    • Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (66 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:06:53 -0500
    • Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (144 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:52:26 -0400
    • Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (103 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:28:52 -0500
    • Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (225 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:12:29 -0400
    • Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (144 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:25:53 -0500
    • Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (200 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:56:04 -0400
    • Re: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (43 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:52:18 -0500

28. Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing
    • Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing (130 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:21:12 -0500
    • Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing (139 lines)
      From: eugene hayhoe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:49:24 -0700
    • Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing (39 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:32:51 +0200
    • Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing (44 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:43:49 -0500
    • Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing (194 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:00:17 -0400
    • Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing (96 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:55:29 -0500
    • Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing (22 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:07:11 -0700
    • Re: Cataloguing again--more OCLC, AACR2 bashing (31 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:25:47 -0500

29. Cataloguing again--was: LP RECORD STORAGE
    • Cataloguing again--was: LP RECORD STORAGE (65 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 21:01:47 -0400

30. Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility?
    • Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (90 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:18:16 -0400
    • Re: Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (92 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:48:56 -0500
    • Re: Cataloguing still :-)--was: Cataloguing again--ARSC responsibility? (49 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:59:22 -0700

31. centre speaker is sympathetically vibrating
    • centre speaker is sympathetically vibrating (80 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:19:40 -0500

32. Cheap computer books -- final call
    • Cheap computer books -- final call (26 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:04:28 -0400

33. Chinese copies- slang
    • Chinese copies- slang (33 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:59:09 -0400
    • Re: Chinese copies- slang (50 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:13:50 -0400
    • Re: Chinese copies- slang (44 lines)
      From: Sam Brylawski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:28:06 -0400
    • Re: Chinese copies- slang (35 lines)
      From: Aaron Z Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:30:32 -0400

34. Chinese recordings?
    • Chinese recordings? (18 lines)
      From: Jonathan Wise <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:59:55 -0400
    • Re: Chinese recordings? (50 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:37:13 -0400

35. computer books cheap
    • computer books cheap (62 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:08:42 -0400

36. Concertape SSS?
    • Concertape SSS? (29 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:24:25 -0400
    • Re: Concertape SSS? (29 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:45:31 -0400
    • Re: Concertape SSS? (27 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:09:58 EDT
    • Re: Concertape SSS? (29 lines)
      From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:57:45 -0400
    • Re: Concertape SSS? (41 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 07:31:46 -0700
    • Re: Concertape SSS? (41 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:58:58 -0400
    • Re: Concertape SSS? (69 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:27:46 -0400

37. Converter
    • Converter (22 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 06:43:16 -0400
    • Re: Converter (45 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:34:17 -1000

38. Damping (was: Can 78s sound better than LPs?)
    • Damping (was: Can 78s sound better than LPs?) (28 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:54:11 -0400
    • Re: Damping (was: Can 78s sound better than LPs?) (44 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:24:36 -0700
    • Re: Damping (was: Can 78s sound better than LPs?) (52 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:32:31 -0400

39. DAT tapes
    • DAT tapes (25 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:27:39 -0400
    • Re: DAT tapes (31 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:55:12 EDT
    • Re: DAT tapes (38 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:02:01 -0400
    • Re: DAT tapes (56 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:04:09 -0500

40. Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
    • Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (161 lines)
      From: Rob Bamberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:40:22 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (40 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:23:40 -0700
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (36 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:31:42 -0700
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (52 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:53:54 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (185 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:49:18 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (28 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:49:28 EDT
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (61 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:08:37 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (74 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:15:10 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (32 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:07:57 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (83 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:38:14 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (94 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:01:39 -0700
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (145 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:09:09 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (153 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:33:31 -0700
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (177 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:54:47 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (34 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:14:36 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (28 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:20:22 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (27 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:44:26 -0500
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (36 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:59:31 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (55 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:55:51 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (47 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:27:00 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (68 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:30:20 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (37 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:25:40 -0500
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (72 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:08:58 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (27 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:05:49 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (47 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:01:59 +0000
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (56 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:25:29 -0400
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:38:39 -0700
    • Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis? (44 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:35:54 -0400

41. Figure 8, was Not using headphones
    • Re: Figure 8, was Not using headphones (45 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:34:23 -0400
    • Re: Figure 8, was Not using headphones (27 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:15:08 -0700
    • Re: Figure 8, was Not using headphones (26 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:27:23 -0400

42. File Size Confusion
    • File Size Confusion (48 lines)
      From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:57:28 -0700
    • Re: File Size Confusion (68 lines)
      From: Eugene Lew <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:17:15 -0400
    • Re: File Size Confusion (97 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:26:36 -0400
    • Re: File Size Confusion (57 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:09:00 -0700
    • Re: File Size Confusion (68 lines)
      From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:45:30 -0700
    • Re: File Size Confusion (30 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:01:06 EDT
    • Re: File Size Confusion (120 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:30:50 -0400
    • Re: File Size Confusion (49 lines)
      From: Alec McLane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:06:47 -0400

43. Folkways Records broadcasts
    • Folkways Records broadcasts (32 lines)
      From: Alex Hartov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:06:31 -0400
    • Re: Folkways Records broadcasts (46 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:06:38 -0700
    • Re: Folkways Records broadcasts (57 lines)
      From: Alex Hartov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:23:00 -0400
    • Re: Folkways Records broadcasts (44 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:12:15 -0700

44. FOX HOLLOW folk LP's
    • FOX HOLLOW folk LP's (19 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:26:42 -0400
    • Re: FOX HOLLOW folk LP's (31 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:40:47 -0700

45. Fw: Lost Musical Treasure
    • Fw: Lost Musical Treasure (49 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:01:30 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure (65 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:11:51 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure (80 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:23:47 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure (35 lines)
      From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:10:34 -0500
    • Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure (62 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:11:09 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure (59 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:15:43 -0700
    • Re: Fw: Lost Musical Treasure (29 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:04:03 EDT

46. FW: [ARSCLIST] Chinese copies- slang
    • FW: [ARSCLIST] Chinese copies- slang (67 lines)
      From: Aaron Z Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:19:19 -0400

47. FW: [MLA-L] Fw: JISC consultation: _Gramophone_
    • FW: [MLA-L] Fw: JISC consultation: _Gramophone_ (122 lines)
      From: Farrington, Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:10:31 -0400

48. FW: [music] 75th Birthday Special for/with Chris Strachwitz on KPFA (fwd)
    • FW: [music] 75th Birthday Special for/with Chris Strachwitz on KPFA (fwd) (179 lines)
      From: JJJJ <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 21:00:43 -0400

49. Fwd: IASA Mexico Conference
    • Fwd: IASA Mexico Conference (70 lines)
      From: Sam Brylawski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:24:19 -0400

50. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Can 78s sound better than LPs?
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Can 78s sound better than LPs? (70 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:48:44 EDT

51. Fwd: [eefc] California Gold website
    • Fwd: [eefc] California Gold website (72 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 16:34:17 -0700

52. George Gaskin recording sought
    • George Gaskin recording sought (17 lines)
      From: Matthew Barton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:24:15 -0400
    • Re: George Gaskin recording sought (36 lines)
      From: Susan Stinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:48:08 -0400
    • Re: George Gaskin recording sought (47 lines)
      From: Matthew Barton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:52:35 -0400

53. Glitchy dats
    • Glitchy dats (20 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 11:41:51 -0400
    • Re: Glitchy dats (24 lines)
      From: Jeff Carroll <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:51:10 -0400
    • Re: Glitchy dats (47 lines)
      From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 11:58:26 -0500
    • Re: Glitchy dats (53 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:08:36 -0400
    • Re: Glitchy dats (45 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:09:46 -1000
    • Re: Glitchy dats (27 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:12:14 -0500
    • Re: Glitchy dats (37 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:22:33 -0400
    • Re: Glitchy dats (48 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:12:00 -0400
    • Re: Glitchy dats (39 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:04:05 -0500
    • Re: Glitchy dats (76 lines)
      From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:18:20 -0700
    • Re: Glitchy dats (85 lines)
      From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:19:59 -0700
    • Re: Glitchy dats (51 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:31:47 -0400
    • Re: Glitchy dats (68 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 22:16:51 -0500
    • Re: Glitchy dats (81 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 23:38:38 -0400
    • Re: Glitchy dats (51 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:48:03 -0500
    • Re: Glitchy dats (76 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:12:17 -0400
    • Re: Glitchy dats (52 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:26:17 -0400

54. help needed regarding sputnik documentary
    • help needed regarding sputnik documentary (23 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:35:15 EDT
    • Re: help needed regarding sputnik documentary (49 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:20:57 -0700
    • Re: help needed regarding sputnik documentary (32 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:00:15 -0700
    • Re: help needed regarding sputnik documentary (34 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:23:44 -0700
    • Re: help needed regarding sputnik documentary (34 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:50:01 -0700
    • Re: help needed regarding sputnik documentary (46 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:21:37 -0700

55. How many 78's--was: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study
    • How many 78's--was: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (48 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:17:23 -0400
    • Re: How many 78's--was: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (68 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:26:00 -0400
    • Re: How many 78's--was: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (52 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:33:42 +0000
    • Re: How many 78's--was: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (34 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:28:16 -0400

56. IASA Conference
    • IASA Conference (32 lines)
      From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:38:16 -0500
    • Re: IASA Conference (43 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:10:51 -0700
    • Re: IASA Conference (27 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:21:15 EDT

57. IASA Conference and the Political Situation in Mexico
    • IASA Conference and the Political Situation in Mexico (67 lines)
      From: Sam Brylawski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:46:48 -0400

58. IASA Conference in Mexico (re: Kurt Nauck's concerns)
    • Re: IASA Conference in Mexico (re: Kurt Nauck's concerns) (21 lines)
      From: Jacqueline von Arb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:49:33 +0200

59. Ives' Universe Symphony
    • Ives' Universe Symphony (37 lines)
      From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:53:51 -0700
    • Re: Ives' Universe Symphony (80 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:06:29 -0400
    • Re: Ives' Universe Symphony (80 lines)
      From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:09:41 -0700

60. J Folksay records label vs. Stinson records
    • Re: J Folksay records label vs. Stinson records (123 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:52:57 -0400
    • Re: J Folksay records label vs. Stinson records (142 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 07:20:56 -0400
    • Re: J Folksay records label vs. Stinson records (151 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:22 -0400
    • Re: J Folksay records label vs. Stinson records (131 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:46:01 -0400

61. JOB POSTING: Audio Specialist - Gospel Music Restoration Project
    • JOB POSTING: Audio Specialist - Gospel Music Restoration Project (62 lines)
      From: Sha_Towers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:22:53 -0500

62. Josh White Langston Hughes Folksay records label Folksong and folksingers Stinson records
    • Josh White Langston Hughes Folksay records label Folksong and folksingers Stinson records (89 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:32:45 -0400
    • Re: Josh White Langston Hughes Folksay records label Folksong and folksingers Stinson records (57 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:00:58 -0700

63. Klaus Asher
    • Klaus Asher (22 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:46:37 -0500

64. Kostelanetz
    • Kostelanetz (32 lines)
      From: Matthew Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:38:50 -0400

65. Kostelanetz, was [ARSCLIST] Transfer responsibility
    • Re: Kostelanetz, was [ARSCLIST] Transfer responsibility (40 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:51:04 -0400
    • Re: Kostelanetz, was [ARSCLIST] Transfer responsibility (76 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:45:25 -0400
    • Re: Kostelanetz, was [ARSCLIST] Transfer responsibility (84 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:00:57 -0400

66. link to ebay listings
    • link to ebay listings (18 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:09:27 -0400
    • Re: link to ebay listings (29 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:33:04 -0700

67. Lomax The Songhunter
    • Re: Lomax The Songhunter (28 lines)
      From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:04:46 -0700
    • Re: Lomax The Songhunter (29 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:42:27 EDT

68. Looking for Odeon recording
    • Looking for Odeon recording (27 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:01:21 -0400
    • Re: Looking for Odeon recording (36 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:09:33 -0700
    • Re: Looking for Odeon recording (41 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:30:30 -0400

69. Lotz-Liste-23
    • Lotz-Liste-23 (50 lines)
      From: Dr. Rainer E. Lotz c/o Birgit Lotz Verlag <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:56:16 +0200

70. LP RECORD STORAGE
    • LP RECORD STORAGE (21 lines)
      From: Rod Smear <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 16:29:21 -0700
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (24 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:12:47 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (46 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:13:14 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (52 lines)
      From: -=sVo=- <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:53:40 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (68 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:10:56 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (56 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 22:27:10 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (69 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:09:44 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (40 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:45:23 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (83 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 06:11:15 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (102 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 08:17:28 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (117 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 08:57:52 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (114 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:23:42 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (34 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:27:18 -0700
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (55 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:29:27 -0700
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (78 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:32:17 -0700
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (117 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:42:00 -0700
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (44 lines)
      From: Dr. Cheryl Thurber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:55:38 -0700
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (68 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:58:47 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (93 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:11:51 -0700
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (82 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:22:59 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (97 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:50:37 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (99 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:00:44 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (178 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:19:53 -0700
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (167 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:35:19 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (96 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:49:22 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (270 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:19:40 -0700
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (37 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:43:27 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (53 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:15:11 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (36 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:04:49 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (45 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:22:31 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (25 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:56:31 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (22 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:57:55 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (27 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:34:35 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (34 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:39:29 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (27 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:40:38 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (40 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:41:02 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (43 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:13:11 EDT
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (32 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:25:41 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (65 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:43:34 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (85 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:42:33 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (39 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 01:39:47 EDT
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (61 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 06:31:49 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (36 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:45:32 -0500
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (74 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:32:10 -0700
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (86 lines)
      From: eugene hayhoe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:53:45 -0700
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (102 lines)
      From: Dr. Cheryl Thurber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:50:44 -0700
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (211 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:00:48 -0700
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (76 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:26:18 EDT
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (143 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:14:29 -0400
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (152 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:45:18 -0700
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE (39 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 09:13:57 EDT

71. LP RECORD STORAGE - plywood/particle board
    • Re: LP RECORD STORAGE - plywood/particle board (52 lines)
      From: eugene hayhoe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 07:08:23 -0700

72. Magnetic tape through the mail
    • Magnetic tape through the mail (30 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:24:36 -0400
    • Re: Magnetic tape through the mail (39 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:37:10 -0700
    • Re: Magnetic tape through the mail (60 lines)
      From: Jeff Willens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:29:29 -0400
    • Re: Magnetic tape through the mail (80 lines)
      From: Rob Poretti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:43:14 -0400
    • Re: Magnetic tape through the mail (79 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:22:56 -0400
    • Re: Magnetic tape through the mail (86 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:54:19 -0500
    • Re: Magnetic tape through the mail (91 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:07:06 -0400
    • Re: Magnetic tape through the mail (17 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:54:37 EDT
    • Re: Magnetic tape through the mail (27 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:03:25 -0400
    • Re: Magnetic tape through the mail (22 lines)
      From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:04:12 -0400

73. Mahler 4th: Konoye wanted
    • Mahler 4th: Konoye wanted (21 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:50:05 -0400
    • Re: Mahler 4th: Konoye wanted (32 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:20:06 -0700

74. Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones)
    • Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones) (33 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:04:39 -0400
    • Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones) (42 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:50:12 -0400
    • Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones) (47 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:07:25 -0400
    • Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones) (45 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:30:10 -0400
    • Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones) (52 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:44:05 -0400
    • Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones) (59 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:49:41 -0400
    • Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones) (47 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:56:50 -0500
    • Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones) (31 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:24:06 -0400
    • Re: Malcolm Chisolm (Was: Not using headphones) (51 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:41:13 -0400

75. Mellencamp
    • Mellencamp (24 lines)
      From: Mahern, Paul Cantwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:16:39 -0400
    • Re: Mellencamp (37 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:57:44 -0400
    • Re: Mellencamp (41 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:13:33 -0400
    • Re: Mellencamp (37 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:28:12 -0400
    • Re: Mellencamp (19 lines)
      From: Mahern, Paul Cantwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:00:35 -0400
    • Re: Mellencamp (26 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:17:07 -0400

76. Microcassettes
    • Microcassettes (22 lines)
      From: Marcia Segal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:41:17 -0400

77. Microphones--was: Not using headphones
    • Microphones--was: Not using headphones (31 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:14:59 -0400

78. Mitsubishi X-86 and ESM (was Glitchy dats)
    • Re: Mitsubishi X-86 and ESM (was Glitchy dats) (50 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:19:12 -0400

79. My Tape Covers
    • Re: My Tape Covers (21 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 01:10:53 -0700

80. NASA
    • NASA (21 lines)
      From: Mahern, Paul Cantwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:36:20 -0400
    • Re: NASA (29 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:54:01 EDT
    • Re: NASA (63 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:31:13 -0400
    • Re: NASA (84 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:50:18 -0400
    • Re: NASA (113 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:07:48 -0400
    • Re: NASA (169 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:21:04 -0400
    • Re: NASA (52 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:45:15 -0700
    • Re: NASA (35 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:16:43 -0700
    • Re: NASA (162 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:43:01 -0400
    • Re: NASA (53 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:52:14 -0400
    • Re: NASA (46 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:07:42 -0700
    • Re: NASA (56 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:34:34 -0400
    • Re: NASA (60 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:43:22 -0400
    • Re: NASA (81 lines)
      From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:47:03 -0700
    • Re: NASA (45 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:59:26 -0700
    • Re: NASA (30 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:26:57 -0700
    • Re: NASA (23 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:58:36 -0700
    • Re: NASA (31 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:30:25 -0700
    • Re: NASA (36 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:34:11 -0700
    • Re: NASA (32 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:08:59 -0400
    • Re: NASA (84 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:33:12 -0400
    • Re: NASA (43 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:06:00 +0000
    • Re: NASA (43 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:05:08 -0700
    • Re: NASA (84 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:41:36 +0000

81. NASA (and beyond, far beyond!)
    • Re: NASA (and beyond, far beyond!) (102 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:05:14 -0700

82. National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (31 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:02:10 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (27 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:06:41 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (37 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:28:16 -0700
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (40 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:42:21 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (40 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:07:06 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (74 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:42:21 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (95 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:19:40 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (24 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:42:06 -0500
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (38 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:09:32 -0400

83. Need help understanding how to get an Important Folk Music collection Accessible
    • Need help understanding how to get an Important Folk Music collection Accessible (42 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:39:47 EDT

84. New History Page available
    • New History Page available (31 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 02:08:19 -0400

85. Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders
    • Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders (32 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:48:10 EDT
    • Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders (41 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:00:13 -0700
    • Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders (33 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:36:34 -0700
    • Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders (55 lines)
      From: Eugene Lew <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:44:26 -0400
    • Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders (23 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:43:53 -0400
    • Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders (45 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:52:03 -0700
    • Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders (48 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:21:42 -0400
    • Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders (58 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:44:23 -0400
    • Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders (39 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:14:27 -0400
    • Re: Non Tekkie question re: consumer CD recorders (22 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:44:37 -0500

86. Non-RIAA preamp
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (79 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:04:50 -0400

87. Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???)
    • Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (27 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:16:38 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (40 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:01:36 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (27 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:06:58 -0500
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (34 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:36:13 -0700
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (31 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:07:20 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (48 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:01:01 -0500
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (70 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:16:41 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (78 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:01:45 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (82 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:04:28 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (27 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:53:41 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (39 lines)
      From: seva <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:18:55 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (62 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:34:33 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (33 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:48:29 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (24 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:00:28 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (29 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:46:59 -0700
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (22 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:38:30 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (53 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:15:33 -0500
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (36 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:02:28 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (47 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:24:22 -0400
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (80 lines)
      From: Doug Pomeroy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:46:32 +0000
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (35 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:12:03 -0700
    • Re: Non-RIAA preamp (was: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do???) (26 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:20:40 -0500

88. Not using headphones
    • Not using headphones (34 lines)
      From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:47:39 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (47 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:31:21 +0200
    • Re: Not using headphones (57 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:15:07 EDT
    • Re: Not using headphones (29 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:32:56 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (57 lines)
      From: MD at Upsala <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:13:36 -0500
    • Re: Not using headphones (85 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:49:21 +0200
    • Re: Not using headphones (23 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:16:22 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (44 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:45:27 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (33 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:00:41 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (39 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:16:57 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (55 lines)
      From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:55:40 -0500
    • Re: Not using headphones (103 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 07:55:10 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (45 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:15:41 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (49 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:13:10 +0000
    • Re: Not using headphones (18 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:26:16 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (68 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:13:32 +0200
    • Re: Not using headphones (32 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:15:09 -0700
    • Re: Not using headphones (56 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:51:33 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (75 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:48:42 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (72 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:14:22 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (25 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:45:12 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (22 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:53:19 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (110 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:57:07 -0700
    • Re: Not using headphones (35 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:55:44 -0700
    • Re: Not using headphones (53 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:06:22 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (23 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:22:21 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (24 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:31:42 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (47 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:45:28 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (49 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:37:06 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (99 lines)
      From: Matthew Barton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:45:27 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (80 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:37:02 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (41 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:03:31 +0000
    • Re: Not using headphones (75 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:45:01 -0600
    • Re: Not using headphones (24 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:25:47 -0700
    • Re: Not using headphones (40 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:32:05 -0700
    • Re: Not using headphones (101 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:55:47 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (93 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:09:11 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (83 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:09:37 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (46 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:25:46 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (74 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:20:27 -0600
    • Re: Not using headphones (41 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:41:10 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (77 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:07:13 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (41 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:12:30 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (27 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:39:05 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (32 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:26:31 -0400
    • Re: Not using headphones (117 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:59:17 -0400

89. Oistrakh at The Fair
    • Oistrakh at The Fair (19 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:24:15 -0700

90. Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers
    • Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers (17 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:15:04 EDT
    • Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers (27 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:38:39 -0700
    • Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers (37 lines)
      From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:09:01 -0700
    • Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers (58 lines)
      From: Bruce Maddocks <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:38:18 -0700
    • Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers (85 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:35:50 -0700
    • Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers (96 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:57:34 -0500
    • Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers (91 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:01:38 -0500
    • Re: Otari 5050-B III Pinch Rollers (22 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:00:19 -0400

91. Overtone Records
    • Overtone Records (49 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:58:06 -0400
    • Re: Overtone Records (57 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:38:15 -0700
    • Re: Overtone Records (77 lines)
      From: Susan Stinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:50:45 -0400

92. Peter Copeland
    • Peter Copeland (72 lines)
      From: Bewley, Nigel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:00:45 +0100
    • Re: Peter Copeland (89 lines)
      From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:35:26 -0500
    • Re: Peter Copeland (83 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 15:08:04 -0700
    • Re: Peter Copeland (77 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:20:54 -0400
    • Re: Peter Copeland (141 lines)
      From: Jonathan Wise <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:39:51 -0400

93. Podcasting--explained a bit...
    • Podcasting--explained a bit... (39 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:29:17 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (91 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:44:46 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (65 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:00:02 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (39 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:10:45 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (115 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:00:55 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (76 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:23:16 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (44 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:43:29 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (100 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:15:50 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (84 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:20:14 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (51 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:06:05 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (44 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:16:10 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (35 lines)
      From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:03:14 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (77 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:32:30 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (78 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:08:51 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (61 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:10:52 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (38 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:00:28 EDT
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (84 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:29:14 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (31 lines)
      From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:57:20 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (45 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:02:26 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (50 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:26:30 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (39 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:32:14 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (62 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:41:52 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (42 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:25:47 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (111 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:13:50 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (48 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:43:22 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (32 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:28:14 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (35 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:30:28 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (57 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:37:25 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (33 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:37:55 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (51 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:06:30 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (87 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:15:43 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (41 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:20:27 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (140 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:03:25 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (53 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:13:29 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (31 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:43:23 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (25 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:28:32 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (38 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:53:46 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (50 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:49:16 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (25 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:55:00 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (29 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:46:44 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (25 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:39:33 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (51 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:51:48 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (41 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:19:48 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (57 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:25:51 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (33 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:59:01 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (49 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:14:22 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (32 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:42:58 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--explained a bit... (44 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:32:32 +0000

94. Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion
    • Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion (26 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:17:25 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion (28 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:28:03 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion (44 lines)
      From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:42:30 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion (31 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:54:38 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion (56 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:43:05 -0400
    • Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion (34 lines)
      From: Russ Hamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:04:47 -0700
    • Re: Podcasting--was: File Size Confusion (44 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:38:49 -0400

95. Presonus 1394
    • Presonus 1394 (29 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:26:20 -0400

96. Professional courtesy: Looking for "The Lake Song"
    • Professional courtesy: Looking for "The Lake Song" (63 lines)
      From: andy Kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:39:03 -0400
    • Re: Professional courtesy: Looking for "The Lake Song" (81 lines)
      From: DSL FODA01 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:05:36 -0400

97. RCA Metal Parts in Camden.
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (30 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:43:38 EDT
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (49 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:44:45 +0200
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (55 lines)
      From: John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:44:10 -0500
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (74 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:43:04 -0400
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (124 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:36:56 -0700
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (40 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:49:18 -0700
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (46 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:18:53 -0400
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (62 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:27:39 -0400
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (90 lines)
      From: Pete Tinker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:35:54 -0700
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (29 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:11:44 -0500
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (20 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:19:48 -0700
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (28 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:49:44 -0700
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (32 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:17:48 -0400
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (28 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:33:51 -0700
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (25 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:37:40 EDT
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (35 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:12:02 -0400
    • Re: RCA Metal Parts in Camden. (51 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:31:50 -0400

98. Recall: [ARSCLIST] Glitchy dats
    • Recall: [ARSCLIST] Glitchy dats (14 lines)
      From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:21:19 -0700
    • Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] Glitchy dats (22 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 22:57:44 -0400

99. Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE
    • Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE (39 lines)
      From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:03:07 -0700
    • Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE (54 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:22:50 -0700
    • Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE (30 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:12:02 EDT
    • Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE (35 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:47:42 -0400
    • Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE (32 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:05:00 -0700
    • Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE (61 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:39:07 -0700
    • Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE (30 lines)
      From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:48:43 -0700
    • Re: Recall: [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE (37 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:12:09 -0700

100. Recall: ^ [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE
     • Re: Recall: ^ [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE (26 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:40:23 -0400
     • Re: Recall: ^ [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE (35 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:19:32 -0400
     • Re: Recall: ^ [ARSCLIST] LP RECORD STORAGE (28 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:00:00 -0700

101. rejoining the flock
     • rejoining the flock (15 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 23:15:15 -0400
     • Re: rejoining the flock (21 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 23:35:56 -0400
     • Re: rejoining the flock (29 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 23:43:40 -0400
     • Re: rejoining the flock (28 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 21:14:50 -0700
     • Re: rejoining the flock (35 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:23:58 -0400
     • Re: rejoining the flock (55 lines)
       From: Jacqueline von Arb <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:54:41 +0200

102. Scotch 200 box photograph
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph (15 lines)
       From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:21:29 -0400
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph (26 lines)
       From: eugene hayhoe <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:45:12 -0700

103. Scotch 200 box photograph -- update
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -- update (28 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:31:10 -0400
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -- update (38 lines)
       From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:31:27 -0400

104. Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (44 lines)
       From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:45:44 -0500
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (48 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 20:39:13 -0400
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (22 lines)
       From: Aaron Z Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:19:17 -0400
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (38 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:43:14 -0700
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (33 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:15:22 -0400
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (47 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:17:20 -0400
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (60 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:36:38 -0400
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (77 lines)
       From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 23:13:10 -0700
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (47 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 07:58:43 -0700
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (43 lines)
       From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:04:26 -0600
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (57 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:05:49 -0700
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (64 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:09:37 -0400
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (33 lines)
       From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:30:39 -0600
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (35 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:51:29 -0400
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (45 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:02:53 -0700
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (53 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:53:56 -0400
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (43 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:32:34 -0700
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (63 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:34:38 -0700
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (79 lines)
       From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:36:02 -0600
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (98 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:01:55 -0400
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (33 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:15:26 -0700
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (33 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:09:57 -0700
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (74 lines)
       From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 15:11:57 -0400
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (29 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:23:18 -0700
     • Re: Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response (101 lines)
       From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:38:18 -0500

105. Searching For Ethnomusic Footage
     • Re: Searching For Ethnomusic Footage (21 lines)
       From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:08:07 -0700
     • Re: Searching For Ethnomusic Footage (35 lines)
       From: Dr. Cheryl Thurber <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:31:23 -0700
     • Re: Searching For Ethnomusic Footage (31 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:17:18 -0400

106. seeking a semi-obscure article
     • seeking a semi-obscure article (20 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:26:19 -0400
     • Re: seeking a semi-obscure article (39 lines)
       From: Alec McLane <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:45:51 -0400
     • Re: seeking a semi-obscure article (49 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:50:13 -0400

107. seeking another Murrow LP set
     • seeking another Murrow LP set (24 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:40:08 -0400

108. shelving
     • shelving (63 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:49:49 -0400
     • Re: shelving (90 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 19:46:40 -0400

109. Some advice on cassette decks?
     • Some advice on cassette decks? (34 lines)
       From: Craig Breaden <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:56:49 -0400
     • Re: Some advice on cassette decks? (92 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:55:26 -0400
     • Re: Some advice on cassette decks? (65 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:58:16 -0400
     • Re: Some advice on cassette decks? (97 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:29:34 -0400

110. soundscape DAW
     • soundscape DAW (29 lines)
       From: seva <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 22:26:50 -0400
     • Re: soundscape DAW (46 lines)
       From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 23:19:36 -0400
     • Re: soundscape DAW (31 lines)
       From: seva <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:45:08 -0400

111. Soundtrack Pro help...
     • Soundtrack Pro help... (57 lines)
       From: andy kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:06:26 -0400
     • Re: Soundtrack Pro help... (84 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:22:43 -0700
     • Re: Soundtrack Pro help... (92 lines)
       From: Aaron Coe <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:05:09 -0400
     • Re: Soundtrack Pro help... (84 lines)
       From: Moser, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:17:00 -0400
     • Re: Soundtrack Pro help... (114 lines)
       From: andy kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:19:14 -0400

112. SP-15 turntable question
     • SP-15 turntable question (22 lines)
       From: Doug Pomeroy <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:24:51 +0000
     • Re: SP-15 turntable question (27 lines)
       From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:22:44 -0400
     • Re: SP-15 turntable question (53 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:47:49 -0400
     • Re: SP-15 turntable question (50 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:00:02 -0400
     • Re: SP-15 turntable question (61 lines)
       From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:35:04 -0400
     • Re: SP-15 turntable question (32 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:43:42 -0700
     • Re: SP-15 turntable question (34 lines)
       From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:15:25 -0400

113. Speed correction, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Can 78s sound better than LPs?
     • Speed correction, was Re: [ARSCLIST] Can 78s sound better than LPs? (53 lines)
       From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:41:35 -0500

114. stereo or double mono
     • stereo or double mono (30 lines)
       From: Dave Rice <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:28:10 -0400
     • Re: stereo or double mono (42 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:42:18 -0400
     • Re: stereo or double mono (56 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:40:07 -0500
     • Re: stereo or double mono (77 lines)
       From: Mew, Peter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:41:37 +0100
     • Re: stereo or double mono (55 lines)
       From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:47:54 -0600
     • Re: stereo or double mono (57 lines)
       From: Aaron Z Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:12:29 -0400
     • Re: stereo or double mono (48 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:30:27 -0700
     • Re: stereo or double mono (41 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:52:26 -0700
     • Re: stereo or double mono (47 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:39:26 -0400
     • Re: stereo or double mono (35 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:42:46 -0700
     • Re: stereo or double mono (59 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:19:18 -0400
     • Re: stereo or double mono (32 lines)
       From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:40:38 -0500

115. Strage blue amberol
     • Strage blue amberol (24 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:21:59 -0400
     • Re: Strage blue amberol (45 lines)
       From: Susan Stinson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:09:47 -0400

116. tape eaten by 112mkII
     • tape eaten by 112mkII (38 lines)
       From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:53:08 -0700
     • Re: tape eaten by 112mkII (68 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:19:52 -0400
     • Re: tape eaten by 112mkII (69 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:57:01 -0400
     • Re: tape eaten by 112mkII (28 lines)
       From: Peter Mosher <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:44:35 -0400

117. tape op
     • tape op (19 lines)
       From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:47:19 -0500
     • Re: tape op (45 lines)
       From: andy Kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 08:23:38 -0400
     • Re: tape op (65 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:29:25 -0400
     • Re: tape op (34 lines)
       From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:38:45 -0700

118. Tel-Mar or Ter-Mar? (Was: Malcolm Chisolm )
     • Tel-Mar or Ter-Mar? (Was: Malcolm Chisolm ) (43 lines)
       From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:14:16 -0400
     • Re: Tel-Mar or Ter-Mar? (Was: Malcolm Chisolm ) (52 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:29:51 -0400
     • Re: Tel-Mar or Ter-Mar? (Was: Malcolm Chisolm ) (54 lines)
       From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:02:14 -0400
     • Re: Tel-Mar or Ter-Mar? (Was: Malcolm Chisolm ) (25 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:27:59 -0400

119. Telemetry Tapes
     • Re: Telemetry Tapes (72 lines)
       From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:41:23 -0400
     • Re: Telemetry Tapes (79 lines)
       From: Eugene DeAnna <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:18:03 -0400
     • Re: Telemetry Tapes (25 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:38:21 -0700
     • Re: Telemetry Tapes (92 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:55:14 -0700
     • Re: Telemetry Tapes (30 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:16:09 -0700
     • Re: Telemetry Tapes (43 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:43:53 -0700
     • Re: Telemetry Tapes (37 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:45:45 -0400
     • Re: Telemetry Tapes (30 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:46:49 -0700
     • Re: Telemetry Tapes (35 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:13:33 -0400
     • Re: Telemetry Tapes (30 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:31:47 -0700
     • Re: Telemetry Tapes (45 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:35:13 -0400

120. The person responds was Thin tape decay
     • The person responds was Thin tape decay (139 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:36:55 -0400
     • Re: The person responds was Thin tape decay (29 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:40:28 -0700
     • Re: The person responds was Thin tape decay (41 lines)
       From: Nigel Champion (FOA ANT) <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:55:14 +1200
     • Re: The person responds was Thin tape decay (23 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 23:10:55 -0400
     • Re: The person responds was Thin tape decay (35 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 21:30:17 -0700
     • Re: The person responds was Thin tape decay (26 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:04:47 -0400
     • Re: The person responds was Thin tape decay (42 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:15:26 -0400

121. Thin tape decay
     • Thin tape decay (28 lines)
       From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:24:51 -0400
     • Re: Thin tape decay (61 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:52:56 -0400
     • Re: Thin tape decay (35 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:00:33 EDT
     • Re: Thin tape decay (73 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:04:09 -0400
     • Re: Thin tape decay (29 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:57:56 -0700
     • Re: Thin tape decay (42 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:12:33 -0400
     • Re: Thin tape decay (47 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:38:40 -0400
     • Re: Thin tape decay (90 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:45:50 -0400
     • Re: Thin tape decay (31 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:00:32 -0700
     • Re: Thin tape decay (27 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:29:39 EDT
     • Re: Thin tape decay (185 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:42:27 -0400
     • Re: Thin tape decay (65 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 17:15:46 -0400
     • Re: Thin tape decay (29 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 15:57:13 -0700
     • Re: Thin tape decay (66 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 19:25:02 -0400
     • Re: Thin tape decay (42 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:40:47 EDT
     • Re: Thin tape decay (37 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 11:19:48 -0700
     • Re: Thin tape decay (50 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:44:14 -0700
     • Re: Thin tape decay (34 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:33:19 +0000
     • Re: Thin tape decay (46 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:53:06 -0700
     • Re: Thin tape decay (28 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 22:19:37 +0000

122. This week's auction
     • This week's auction (30 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 08:12:19 -0400

123. To bake or not to bake?
     • To bake or not to bake? (36 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:30:12 -0700
     • Re: To bake or not to bake? (41 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:47:12 -0400
     • Re: To bake or not to bake? (59 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:01:24 -0700
     • Re: To bake or not to bake? (81 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:02:07 -0400
     • Re: To bake or not to bake? (99 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:35:55 -0500
     • Re: To bake or not to bake? (49 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:55:48 -0400
     • Re: To bake or not to bake? (25 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:20:53 -0400
     • Re: To bake or not to bake? (39 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:25:57 -0700
     • Re: To bake or not to bake? (47 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:31:13 -0400
     • Re: To bake or not to bake? (25 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:34:45 -0700
     • Re: To bake or not to bake? (46 lines)
       From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:49:57 -1000
     • Re: To bake or not to bake? (64 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:00:09 -0400

124. Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit...
     • Re: Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit... (132 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:45:20 -0400
     • Re: Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit... (51 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:37:03 -0700
     • Re: Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit... (26 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:34:06 -0400
     • Re: Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit... (18 lines)
       From: Ron Fial <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:41:40 -0700
     • Re: Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit... (28 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:36:07 -0700
     • Re: Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit... (62 lines)
       From: Ron Fial <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:54:38 -0700
     • Re: Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit... (107 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:28:53 -0700
     • Re: Transfer responsibility- was Podcasting--explained a bit... (23 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:16:57 -0700

125. UK sound-recording copyright term change...
     • UK sound-recording copyright term change... (22 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:31:19 -0400

126. Use care with new-to-you tape machines
     • Use care with new-to-you tape machines (40 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:16:41 -0400
     • Re: Use care with new-to-you tape machines (49 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:32:40 -0400
     • Re: Use care with new-to-you tape machines (28 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:33:41 -0700
     • Re: Use care with new-to-you tape machines (71 lines)
       From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:40:10 -0700
     • Re: Use care with new-to-you tape machines (65 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:13:38 -0400

127. Video format preferences
     • Video format preferences (45 lines)
       From: Tommy Sjöberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:44:17 +0200
     • Re: Video format preferences (29 lines)
       From: David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:37:37 -0700
     • Re: Video format preferences (44 lines)
       From: Tommy Sjöberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:26:18 +0200
     • Re: Video format preferences (91 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:42:45 -0500
     • Re: Video format preferences (70 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:57:15 -0500

128. WALKIE-RECORDALL {Re: [ARSCLIST] Beginner's question RE: digital recordings}
     • WALKIE-RECORDALL {Re: [ARSCLIST] Beginner's question RE: digital recordings} (39 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:12:10 EDT

129. Wattle Records (Australia)
     • Wattle Records (Australia) (15 lines)
       From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:59:51 -0700

130. Which Stylus Size for 78's (if you could have only one) ?
     • Which Stylus Size for 78's (if you could have only one) ? (36 lines)
       From: DSL FODA01 <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:41:01 -0400
     • Re: Which Stylus Size for 78's (if you could have only one) ? (22 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:53:18 -0400
     • Re: Which Stylus Size for 78's (if you could have only one) ? (37 lines)
       From: Dr. Cheryl Thurber <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:07:39 -0700
     • Re: Which Stylus Size for 78's (if you could have only one) ? (52 lines)
       From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:13:52 +0200
     • Re: Which Stylus Size for 78's (if you could have only one) ? (46 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:31:49 -0700
     • Re: Which Stylus Size for 78's (if you could have only one) ? (79 lines)
       From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:31:29 +0200

131. WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's)
     • WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's) (189 lines)
       From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:36:11 -0700
     • Re: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's) (158 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:21:07 -0400
     • Re: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's) (266 lines)
       From: Andes, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:44:43 -0700
     • Re: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's) (167 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:31:59 -0700
     • Re: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's) (157 lines)
       From: Sherwin Cerini <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 19:20:05 -0400
     • Re: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's) (194 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:52:38 -0400
     • Re: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's) (113 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:49:59 -0400
     • Re: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's) (186 lines)
       From: Sherwin Cerini <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:52:37 -0400
     • Re: WHY save as WAV's when Mp3's can do??? (was Podcasting of 78's) (55 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:18:04 -0400

132. X-Ray records
     • X-Ray records (15 lines)
       From: Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:28:35 -0400
     • Re: X-Ray records (36 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:06:27 -0500
     • Re: X-Ray records (38 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:16:39 -0400
     • Re: X-Ray records (25 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:32:32 -0700
     • Re: X-Ray records (171 lines)
       From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:57:36 -0400
     • Re: X-Ray records (40 lines)
       From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:04:31 +0200
     • Re: X-Ray records (152 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:08:02 -0500

133. ^ Can 78s sound better than LPs?
     • Re: ^ Can 78s sound better than LPs? (20 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:37:45 -0400

134. ^ Magnetic tape through the mail
     • Re: ^ Magnetic tape through the mail (26 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:25:05 -0700

135. ^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes
     • ^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes (62 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:58:56 -0700
     • Re: ^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes (36 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:45:16 +0000
     • Re: ^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes (29 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:01:15 -0400
     • Re: ^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes (29 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:14:19 -0700
     • Re: ^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes (47 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 17:16:02 +0000
     • Re: ^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes (37 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:05:17 -0700
     • Re: ^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes (29 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:46:49 -0400
     • Re: ^ Re: [ARSCLIST] Telemetry Tapes (24 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:21:29 -0400

136. ^ SP-15 turntable question
     • Re: ^ SP-15 turntable question (27 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:06:13 -0400
     • Re: ^ SP-15 turntable question (40 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 05:59:22 -0400

137. ^ Telemetry Tapes
     • Re: ^ Telemetry Tapes (25 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:38:31 -0400
     • Re: ^ Telemetry Tapes (33 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:02:29 -0400
     • Re: ^ Telemetry Tapes (27 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:26:28 -0700