ARSCLIST Archives – May 2006

1. 33 + 45 = 78
   • 33 + 45 = 78 (28 lines)
     From: John Erdmann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 12:16:37 -0700
   • Re: 33 + 45 = 78 (18 lines)
     From: Juan Moreno <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 16:31:04 EDT
   • Re: 33 + 45 = 78 (33 lines)
     From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 13:53:10 -0700
   • Re: 33 + 45 = 78 (39 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 17:09:51 -0400
   • Re: 33 + 45 = 78 (31 lines)
     From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 17:42:31 -0400
   • Re: 33 + 45 = 78 (28 lines)
     From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 14:43:34 -0700
   • Re: 33 + 45 = 78 (17 lines)
     From: Juan Moreno <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 17:52:11 EDT
   • Re: 33 + 45 = 78 (32 lines)
     From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:06:36 -0700
   • Re: 33 + 45 = 78 (82 lines)
     From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 00:27:15 +0200
   • Re: 33 + 45 = 78 (27 lines)
     From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 17:08:55 -0700
   • Re: 33 + 45 = 78 (48 lines)
     From: Bewley, Nigel <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:02:33 +0100

2. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (32 lines)
     From: Jerry McBride <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:19:12 -0700
   • <No subject> (50 lines)
     From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 22:05:24 -0400
   • <No subject> (97 lines)
     From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 19:30:35 -0700

3. a/d converters
   • a/d converters (27 lines)
     From: Mark W. Downs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 14:40:57 -0500
   • Re: a/d converters (39 lines)
     From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 16:08:03 -0400
   • Re: a/d converters (47 lines)
     From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 10:19:59 -1000
   • Re: a/d converters (66 lines)
     From: Mark W. Downs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:29:28 -0500
   • Re: a/d converters (84 lines)
     From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 10:42:18 -1000
   • Re: a/d converters (62 lines)
     From: Mark W. Downs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 17:19:49 -0500
   • Re: a/d converters (80 lines)
     From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:54:41 -0400
   • Re: a/d converters (53 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 22:04:47 -0400
   • Re: a/d converters (37 lines)
     From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 08:24:18 -0500
   • Re: a/d converters (62 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 09:52:39 -0400
   • Re: a/d converters (28 lines)
     From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 09:56:58 -0400
   • Re: a/d converters (49 lines)
     From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 11:21:49 -0500
   • Re: a/d converters (31 lines)
     From: seva <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 16:34:08 -0400

4. ACCESS AND COPYRIGHT POLICY TO AUDIOVISUAL ARCHIVES
   • ACCESS AND COPYRIGHT POLICY TO AUDIOVISUAL ARCHIVES (40 lines)
     From: Ishumael Zinyengere <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 09:00:51 +0100

5. anyone here in Seattle yet?
   • anyone here in Seattle yet? (26 lines)
     From: Dave Nolan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 20:23:27 -0400
   • Re: anyone here in Seattle yet? (36 lines)
     From: wmfisher <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 22:11:52 -0500
   • Re: anyone here in Seattle yet? (39 lines)
     From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 23:28:40 EDT
   • Re: anyone here in Seattle yet? (46 lines)
     From: Ron Fial <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:14:14 -0700

6. ARSC Convention -- Who's coming?
   • ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (23 lines)
     From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 20:48:15 -0700
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (38 lines)
     From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 01:47:00 EDT
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (39 lines)
     From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 07:07:19 -0500
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (58 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 08:59:14 -0400
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (28 lines)
     From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 08:10:16 -0700
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (33 lines)
     From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 11:48:46 EDT
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (73 lines)
     From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 12:11:23 -0400
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (44 lines)
     From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 11:19:17 -0500
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (90 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 12:23:13 -0400
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (62 lines)
     From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 09:36:52 -0700
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (44 lines)
     From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 14:32:38 -0400
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (25 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 20:53:29 -0400
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (31 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 21:33:40 -0400

7. ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (now Hangi vs Umu)
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (now Hangi vs Umu) (76 lines)
     From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 12:38:00 -0500
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (now Hangi vs Umu) (35 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 21:27:38 -0400

8. ARSC Convention -- Who's coming?(now international food)
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming?(now international food) (49 lines)
     From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 22:57:59 -0500
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming?(now international food) (60 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 00:11:29 -0400
   • Re: ARSC Convention -- Who's coming?(now international food) (28 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 00:29:19 -0400

9. Audio equipment cable shielding
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (40 lines)
     From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:36:25 -0500

10. Bobby Blue Bland in Seattle
    • Bobby Blue Bland in Seattle (21 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:36:31 -0400

11. Buttersprites [WAS: Bobby Blue Bland etc]
    • Buttersprites [WAS: Bobby Blue Bland etc] (66 lines)
      From: Prentice, Will <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:10:58 +0100
    • Re: Buttersprites [WAS: Bobby Blue Bland etc] (79 lines)
      From: Alan Visser <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:16:38 +0200
    • Re: Buttersprites [WAS: Bobby Blue Bland etc] (65 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:55:23 -0700
    • Re: Buttersprites [WAS: Bobby Blue Bland etc] (64 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:57:45 -0400
    • Re: Buttersprites [WAS: Bobby Blue Bland etc] (40 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:09:33 -0400
    • Re: Buttersprites [WAS: Bobby Blue Bland etc] (43 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:30:53 -0700
    • Re: Buttersprites [WAS: Bobby Blue Bland etc] (16 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:28:00 EDT
    • Re: Buttersprites [WAS: Bobby Blue Bland etc] (23 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:20:03 -0400

12. can anyone recommend a Studer tech in NYC?
    • can anyone recommend a Studer tech in NYC? (30 lines)
      From: Dave Nolan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 12:45:12 -0400
    • Re: can anyone recommend a Studer tech in NYC? (50 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 13:07:37 -0400
    • Re: can anyone recommend a Studer tech in NYC? (30 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 15:17:40 -0500
    • Re: can anyone recommend a Studer tech in NYC? (46 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:28:32 -0700

13. CBC representative to ARSC-
    • CBC representative to ARSC- (29 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 14:08:47 -0400
    • Re: CBC representative to ARSC- (29 lines)
      From: Matt Love <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 11:37:44 -0700
    • Re: CBC representative to ARSC- (44 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 11:59:56 -0700
    • Re: CBC representative to ARSC- (71 lines)
      From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 14:20:21 -0500
    • Re: CBC representative to ARSC- (46 lines)
      From: Rob Bamberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 15:23:17 -0400
    • Re: CBC representative to ARSC- (68 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 15:44:41 -0400

14. Cold/Dry Storage Module
    • Cold/Dry Storage Module (34 lines)
      From: Bigelow, Sue <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 14:59:15 -0700
    • Re: Cold/Dry Storage Module (61 lines)
      From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 18:03:50 -0400
    • Re: Cold/Dry Storage Module (41 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 21:36:32 -0400

15. commercial - new 78 rpm auction list now available
    • commercial - new 78 rpm auction list now available (50 lines)
      From: Tom Hawthorn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 10:18:26 -0700

16. Conference Photoshow
    • Conference Photoshow (34 lines)
      From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 18:28:14 -0500

17. Conference report
    • Conference report (131 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 23:09:46 EDT

18. Conny Plank's Studio for sale
    • Conny Plank's Studio for sale (24 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:00:32 -0400

19. Contact list
    • Contact list (34 lines)
      From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 09:20:46 -0500
    • Re: Contact list (25 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 10:42:53 -0400
    • Re: Contact list (40 lines)
      From: Susan Stinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 10:49:12 -0400
    • Re: Contact list (45 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 10:56:13 -0400
    • Re: Contact list (18 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:26:09 -0700
    • Re: Contact list (38 lines)
      From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:25:19 -0500
    • Re: Contact list (44 lines)
      From: Susan Stinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 13:20:38 -0400
    • Re: Contact list (19 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 10:31:26 -0700

20. Contact list; was - CBC representative to ARSC-
    • Re: Contact list; was - CBC representative to ARSC- (90 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 01:29:58 -0400
    • Re: Contact list; was - CBC representative to ARSC- (39 lines)
      From: Dave Nolan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 12:30:47 -0400
    • Re: Contact list; was - CBC representative to ARSC- (61 lines)
      From: Nancy Seeger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 13:22:53 -0400
    • Re: Contact list; was - CBC representative to ARSC- (83 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 13:41:25 -0400
    • Re: Contact list; was - CBC representative to ARSC- (37 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 13:54:46 -0400
    • Re: Contact list; was - CBC representative to ARSC- (30 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 11:09:19 -0700
    • Re: Contact list; was - CBC representative to ARSC- (50 lines)
      From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 14:15:28 -0500
    • Re: Contact list; was - CBC representative to ARSC- (71 lines)
      From: Adrienne Cardwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 13:03:16 -0700

21. disaster recovery information for less common audio materials
    • disaster recovery information for less common audio materials (54 lines)
      From: Tara Kennedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:07:39 -0400
    • Re: disaster recovery information for less common audio materials (98 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 20:42:26 -0400

22. Ed Jos Collins, American composer/pianist/conductor: Revised call for recordings/info
    • Ed Jos Collins, American composer/pianist/conductor: Revised call for recordings/info (104 lines)
      From: Jon Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:51:37 EDT
    • Re: Ed Jos Collins, American composer/pianist/conductor: Revised call for recordings/info (27 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:38:07 -0700
    • Re: Ed Jos Collins, American composer/pianist/conductor: Revised call for recordings/info (49 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:21:10 -0700
    • Re: Ed Jos Collins, American composer/pianist/conductor: Revised call for recordings/info (52 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:36:43 -0700

23. For the NRPB study: correlations between archives, collections, and resources
    • For the NRPB study: correlations between archives, collections, and resources (46 lines)
      From: Rob Bamberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 16:58:26 -0400

24. funerisms
    • funerisms (36 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:56:06 -0400

25. Fw: 78 paper sleeves
    • Fw: 78 paper sleeves (31 lines)
      From: Francesco Martinelli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 13:16:12 +0200

26. Fw: Funerary Violin?
    • Fw: Funerary Violin? (58 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 19:19:12 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Funerary Violin? (67 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:24:23 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Funerary Violin? (101 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:52:47 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Funerary Violin? (70 lines)
      From: Nipper <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 22:00:30 -0500

27. Fwd: Smithsonian Folkways Recordings marketing deal
    • Fwd: Smithsonian Folkways Recordings marketing deal (37 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 10:23:14 -0700

28. Hans Fantel obit
    • Hans Fantel obit (34 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:28:24 -0500

29. headphones revisited
    • headphones revisited (28 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 19:57:15 -0400
    • Re: headphones revisited (43 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:43:56 -0700
    • Re: headphones revisited (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:47:48 -0700
    • Re: headphones revisited (52 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 06:48:49 -0400
    • Re: headphones revisited (61 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:21:48 -0400

30. HOW TO Unsubscribe
    • Re: HOW TO Unsubscribe (26 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 20:44:27 EDT

31. IBM Claims 6.67 billion bits per square inch for data tape
    • IBM Claims 6.67 billion bits per square inch for data tape (28 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:29:45 -0400
    • Re: IBM Claims 6.67 billion bits per square inch for data tape (35 lines)
      From: Jon Noring <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:36:08 -0600
    • Re: IBM Claims 6.67 billion bits per square inch for data tape (42 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 08:11:10 -0400
    • Re: IBM Claims 6.67 billion bits per square inch for data tape (25 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:49:59 -0500
    • Re: IBM Claims 6.67 billion bits per square inch for data tape (74 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:15:14 -0400
    • Re: IBM Claims 6.67 billion bits per square inch for data tape (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 08:32:50 -0700

32. Invitation to AES-PNW section meeting in Seattle
    • Invitation to AES-PNW section meeting in Seattle (38 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 16:48:33 -0400

33. Job Opening in San Francisco, CA
    • Re: Job Opening in San Francisco, CA (67 lines)
      From: Adrienne Cardwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 17:57:21 -0700

34. Job Openings
    • Job Openings (27 lines)
      From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 19:38:28 -0500
    • Re: Job Openings (35 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 09:11:52 -0500
    • Re: Job Openings (46 lines)
      From: Bob Wasserman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 13:48:20 -0500
    • Re: Job Openings (118 lines)
      From: Bronwyn Officer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 09:50:11 +1200

35. Johnnie & George "Be Mir Bist Du Schoen" on 78
    • Re: Johnnie & George "Be Mir Bist Du Schoen" on 78 (30 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 13:57:29 -0400

36. land--was: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension
    • land--was: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (21 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 18:22:10 -0400
    • Re: land--was: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (37 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:01:34 -0700
    • Re: land--was: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (37 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:47:17 -0500
    • Re: land--was: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (44 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 15:33:58 EDT
    • Re: land--was: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (57 lines)
      From: Russ Hamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:01:36 -0700
    • Re: land--was: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (53 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 09:48:55 -0500
    • Re: land--was: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (85 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 19:13:42 -0400
    • Re: land--was: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (106 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 22:45:14 -0400

37. lateral cut switch
    • lateral cut switch (16 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 00:30:25 -0500
    • Re: lateral cut switch (33 lines)
      From: Graeme Jaye <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 09:52:05 +0200
    • Re: lateral cut switch (45 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 13:40:43 +0200
    • Re: lateral cut switch (37 lines)
      From: Graeme Jaye <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 13:59:37 +0200
    • Re: lateral cut switch (26 lines)
      From: Mark Durenberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 07:52:59 -0600
    • Re: lateral cut switch (48 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:34:33 +0200
    • Re: lateral cut switch (70 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 10:43:15 -0500
    • Re: lateral cut switch (44 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 21:46:38 -0400
    • Re: lateral cut switch (60 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 08:57:07 -0400
    • Re: lateral cut switch (67 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 18:54:17 -0500
    • Re: lateral cut switch (115 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:58:47 -0400
    • Re: lateral cut switch (125 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:13:18 -0400
    • Re: lateral cut switch (37 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 22:40:52 -0400

38. Letter on British Copyright Term Extension
    • Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (129 lines)
      From: Tim Brooks <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:02:58 EDT
    • Re: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (51 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 21:34:28 -0400
    • Re: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (124 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:08:02 -0400
    • Re: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (143 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:09:24 -0400
    • Re: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (22 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:24:41 -0500
    • Re: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (27 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:41:12 -0400
    • Re: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (31 lines)
      From: Russ Hamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:23:28 -0700
    • Re: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (44 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:26:36 -0400
    • Re: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (33 lines)
      From: Russ Hamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:38:59 -0700
    • Re: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (69 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:27:12 -0400
    • Re: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (74 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:37:03 -0400
    • Re: Letter on British Copyright Term Extension (57 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:41:36 -0500

39. List Dinner in Seattle
    • List Dinner in Seattle (35 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:21:23 -0700
    • Re: List Dinner in Seattle (60 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 22:53:54 -0400
    • Re: List Dinner in Seattle (26 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:06:41 EDT

40. Locating audio recordings of Marie and/or Pierre Curie
    • Re: Locating audio recordings of Marie and/or Pierre Curie (38 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 06:54:28 -0700
    • Re: Locating audio recordings of Marie and/or Pierre Curie (62 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 11:11:41 -0400

41. Looking for 78 speed record player
    • Looking for 78 speed record player (20 lines)
      From: Rod Smear <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:14:20 -0700
    • Re: Looking for 78 speed record player (36 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 19:01:32 -0500
    • Re: Looking for 78 speed record player (27 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:44:15 -0400
    • Re: Looking for 78 speed record player (18 lines)
      From: Juan Moreno <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 21:11:36 EDT
    • Re: Looking for 78 speed record player (31 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:28:47 -0500
    • Re: Looking for 78 speed record player (55 lines)
      From: Rod Smear <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:00:04 -0700
    • Re: Looking for 78 speed record player (47 lines)
      From: Rod Smear <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:01:41 -0700
    • Re: Looking for 78 speed record player (54 lines)
      From: Pete Tinker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:29:30 -0700
    • Re: Looking for 78 speed record player (74 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 11:35:52 -0400
    • Re: Looking for 78 speed record player (69 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 11:39:30 -0400
    • Re: Looking for 78 speed record player (73 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 09:42:39 -0600

42. Looking for a Otari mx-5050 BQ II manual / service manual
    • Looking for a Otari mx-5050 BQ II manual / service manual (22 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:07:04 -0400

43. Looking for Sarah Cunningham -- and contact list
    • Looking for Sarah Cunningham -- and contact list (84 lines)
      From: Hannah Sommers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 13:51:08 -0400

44. MCI / SONY Audio JH 600 Console Parts
    • MCI / SONY Audio JH 600 Console Parts (43 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:27:06 -0400
    • Re: MCI / SONY Audio JH 600 Console Parts (81 lines)
      From: James Lindner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:43:25 -0400
    • Re: MCI / SONY Audio JH 600 Console Parts (107 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:05:29 -0400

45. Misbegotten notions: how to pirate an LP
    • Misbegotten notions: how to pirate an LP (20 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:41:34 -0400
    • Re: Misbegotten notions: how to pirate an LP (38 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:26:51 -0400
    • Re: Misbegotten notions: how to pirate an LP (27 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:59:05 -0700
    • Re: Misbegotten notions: how to pirate an LP (38 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:11:29 -0400

46. monitoring headphones
    • monitoring headphones (24 lines)
      From: Francesco Martinelli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:45:52 +0200
    • Re: monitoring headphones (32 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 06:44:06 -0400
    • Re: monitoring headphones (66 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 07:35:20 -0400
    • Re: monitoring headphones (49 lines)
      From: Jonathan Wise <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:31:29 -0400
    • Re: monitoring headphones (36 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 07:43:05 -0700
    • Re: monitoring headphones (48 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:39:09 -0700
    • Re: monitoring headphones (46 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:32:53 -0400
    • Re: monitoring headphones (37 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:26:11 -0700
    • monitoring headphones (52 lines)
      From: Al Quaglieri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:43:49 -0400
    • Re: monitoring headphones (20 lines)
      From: Francesco Martinelli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 10:49:25 +0200

47. More light at the end of the tunnel
    • More light at the end of the tunnel (36 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 13:12:27 -0500

48. Music Librarian and Archivist
    • Music Librarian and Archivist (49 lines)
      From: Bronwyn Officer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 17:02:29 +1200

49. National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study
    • National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (67 lines)
      From: Rob Bamberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:26:12 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (71 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 22:05:29 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (44 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 23:03:51 -0700
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (116 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:53:58 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (126 lines)
      From: Jon Noring <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:24:29 -0600
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (53 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 21:19:54 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (100 lines)
      From: Jon Noring <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 20:30:45 -0600
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (105 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:42:49 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (161 lines)
      From: Jon Noring <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 22:43:52 -0600
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (85 lines)
      From: Doug Pomeroy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 19:26:39 +0000
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (29 lines)
      From: Sam Brylawski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 15:43:12 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (65 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 14:40:27 +0000
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (93 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 08:48:11 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (131 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:28:22 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (21 lines)
      From: Russ Hamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:44:27 -0700
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (31 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:10:57 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (33 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:17:19 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (48 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:29:12 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (46 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 13:36:07 -0700
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (43 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:53:00 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (57 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:00:04 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (76 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:11:33 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (81 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:33:32 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (72 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:37:27 -0500
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (29 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:44:15 -0500
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (37 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:00:48 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (54 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:14:05 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (95 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:20:51 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (122 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:36:47 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (94 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:52:23 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:10:26 -0700
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (27 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:23:23 -0700
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (63 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 19:34:53 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (46 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:51:51 -0700
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (71 lines)
      From: Malcolm F Davidson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:02:40 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (28 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:11:26 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (104 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:23:50 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (51 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 23:31:19 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (57 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 23:11:24 -0700
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (69 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 06:10:00 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (37 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:12:07 -0500
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (60 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:28:44 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (34 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:36:01 -0500
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (50 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:46:35 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (50 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:09:39 -0500
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (39 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:10:54 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (42 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:21:21 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (62 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:47:11 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (37 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:57:18 -0500
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (140 lines)
      From: Copeland, Peter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:15:15 +0100
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (170 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:52:34 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (30 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 21:04:05 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (88 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:14:28 -0700
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (37 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:33:50 -0700
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (55 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:48:39 -0700
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (62 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:06:22 -0700
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (25 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 14:38:11 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (38 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 14:47:57 -0500
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (30 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 16:41:21 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (49 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 16:44:06 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (26 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:00:00 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (22 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 07:59:30 -0500
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (27 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 08:31:04 -0500
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (43 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 15:28:45 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (32 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 22:53:03 -0400
    • Re: National Recording Preservation Board (NRPB) Study (44 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 18:55:25 +0000

50. New U.S. Copyright Laws
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (32 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 06:43:27 -0700
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (35 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 11:05:38 -0500
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (29 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 21:01:36 -0400
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (43 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 21:40:15 -0400
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (56 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:24:41 -0500

51. Orphan works
    • Re: Orphan works (44 lines)
      From: Trey Bunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 20:48:52 -0500
    • Re: Orphan works (49 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 19:22:24 -0700

52. Orphan works.
    • Orphan works. (87 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 13:52:01 -0500
    • Re: Orphan works. (116 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:08:36 -0400
    • Re: Orphan works. (96 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 13:26:35 -0700
    • Re: Orphan works. (35 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:27:13 -0700
    • Re: Orphan works. (29 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 23:46:12 -0400
    • Re: Orphan works. (46 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 09:28:15 +0200

53. Purchase of a transcription turntable
    • Purchase of a transcription turntable (31 lines)
      From: Connie Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 13:05:27 -0400
    • Re: Purchase of a transcription turntable (50 lines)
      From: Jonathan Wise <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 13:40:21 -0400
    • Re: Purchase of a transcription turntable (64 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 14:34:30 -0400
    • Re: Purchase of a transcription turntable (55 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 13:42:34 -0500

54. Raucheisen collection
    • Re: Raucheisen collection (35 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 12:26:46 -0700

55. Seeing the light on Acetate vs Polyester
    • Seeing the light on Acetate vs Polyester (23 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 09:15:25 -0400

56. Some "old" copyright news
    • Some "old" copyright news (25 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 12:53:25 -0500
    • Re: Some "old" copyright news (28 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 22:25:58 -0400

57. STEREO HEADPHONES FOR HOME USE
    • STEREO HEADPHONES FOR HOME USE (18 lines)
      From: Rod Smear <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:59:10 -0700
    • Re: STEREO HEADPHONES FOR HOME USE (34 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:24:58 -0700
    • Re: STEREO HEADPHONES FOR HOME USE (47 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:10:44 -0700
    • Re: STEREO HEADPHONES FOR HOME USE (30 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:39:15 -0400
    • Re: STEREO HEADPHONES FOR HOME USE (36 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:42:05 -0400
    • Re: STEREO HEADPHONES FOR HOME USE (50 lines)
      From: Rod Smear <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:46:15 -0700

58. Storing digital media
    • Storing digital media (60 lines)
      From: Christina Hostetter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:17:34 -0400
    • Re: Storing digital media (76 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:27:58 -0700
    • Re: Storing digital media (88 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:52:00 -0400
    • Re: Storing digital media (94 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:14:10 -0400
    • Re: Storing digital media (42 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:14:18 -0500
    • Re: Storing digital media (57 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 21:05:46 -0400
    • Re: Storing digital media (161 lines)
      From: Dave Nolan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:41:00 -0400
    • Re: Storing digital media (81 lines)
      From: Mark W. Downs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:43:55 -0500
    • Re: Storing digital media (145 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:45:22 -0400
    • Re: Storing digital media (46 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:51:09 -0400
    • Re: Storing digital media (114 lines)
      From: Malcolm F Davidson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:30:54 -0400
    • Re: Storing digital media (51 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:41:07 +0000
    • Re: Storing digital media (28 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:04:09 -0400
    • Re: Storing digital media (44 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:32:13 -0400
    • Re: Storing digital media (37 lines)
      From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:46:33 +0200
    • Re: Storing digital media (52 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 05:55:40 -0400
    • Re: Storing digital media (69 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:41:54 -0400
    • Re: Storing digital media (21 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:17:03 -0500
    • Re: Storing digital media (38 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 23:31:16 -0400
    • Re: Storing digital media (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 21:51:50 -0700
    • Re: Storing digital media (48 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 22:24:28 -0400
    • Re: Storing digital media (27 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 19:51:52 -0700
    • Re: Storing digital media (42 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 00:06:00 -0400

59. Survey: Philadelphia area sound/film archives information needed.
    • Survey: Philadelphia area sound/film archives information needed. (23 lines)
      From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 09:21:26 -0400

60. Tapes for free
    • Tapes for free (30 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:25:07 -0700
    • Re: Tapes for free (40 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:04:11 -0700
    • Re: Tapes for free (47 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:17:26 -0400
    • Re: Tapes for free (69 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:54:23 -0500
    • Re: Tapes for free (68 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:11:35 -0700
    • Re: Tapes for free (42 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 15:18:43 -0500
    • Re: Tapes for free (27 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 12:52:21 -0700
    • Re: Tapes for free (39 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 14:59:05 -0500
    • Re: Tapes for free (32 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 17:53:45 -0400
    • Re: Tapes for free (26 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 16:49:33 -0700
    • Re: Tapes for free (37 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 18:59:23 -0500
    • Re: Tapes for free (47 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 21:17:03 -0400

61. The future of analog (fwd)
    • The future of analog (fwd) (19 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 13:23:20 -0500
    • Re: The future of analog (fwd) (29 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:04:33 -0500
    • Re: The future of analog (fwd) (39 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 16:18:14 -0400
    • Re: The future of analog (fwd) (38 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:47:25 -0700
    • Re: The future of analog (fwd) (36 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 20:50:28 -0400
    • Re: The future of analog (fwd) (50 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 21:08:18 -0400
    • Re: The future of analog (fwd) (46 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:05:13 -0700
    • Re: The future of analog (fwd) (40 lines)
      From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:08:54 -0400
    • Re: The future of analog (fwd) (86 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:45:21 -0400
    • Re: The future of analog (fwd) (24 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:46:08 -0400
    • Re: The future of analog (fwd) (88 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:56:17 -0400
    • Re: The future of analog (fwd) (45 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 16:35:59 -0400
    • Re: The future of analog (fwd) (96 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:47:15 -0400
    • Re: The future of analog (fwd) (131 lines)
      From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 21:38:45 -0500
    • Re: The future of analog (fwd) (167 lines)
      From: Claus Trelby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 22:52:57 -0400

62. Things will be HOT at the ARSC Conference!
    • Things will be HOT at the ARSC Conference! (33 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 11:26:16 EDT
    • Re: Things will be HOT at the ARSC Conference! (44 lines)
      From: Bill Schurk <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 12:27:19 -0700
    • Re: Things will be HOT at the ARSC Conference! (52 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 15:44:46 -0400
    • Re: Things will be HOT at the ARSC Conference! (26 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 21:15:24 -0400

63. thorens td124
    • thorens td124 (17 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 00:55:10 -0500
    • Re: thorens td124 (30 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 08:50:05 -0700
    • Re: thorens td124 (30 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 16:57:50 -0500

64. Triage, heroic efforts, and economics
    • Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (89 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 16:38:20 -0400
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (63 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 16:14:23 -0500
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (27 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 19:45:17 EDT
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (93 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 09:13:10 -0400
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (61 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 07:41:27 -0700
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (138 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 12:43:15 -0400
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (25 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 18:01:34 -0400
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (40 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 15:16:46 -0700
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (46 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 15:34:50 -0700
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (51 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 18:34:21 -0400
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (114 lines)
      From: Copeland, Peter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:42:25 +0100
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (152 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 17:04:02 -0400
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (56 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:43:03 -0700
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (184 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 19:33:38 -0400
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (242 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 18:55:19 -0500
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (111 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 13:17:22 -0500
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (81 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 15:39:44 -0400
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (71 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:42:49 -0500
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (46 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 15:13:02 -0700
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (41 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 19:16:32 -0400
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (45 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 19:14:37 -0400
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (40 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:00:42 -0400
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (60 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 09:18:07 -0500
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (33 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 09:32:03 -0500
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (58 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 11:01:50 -0400
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (67 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 18:36:42 +0200
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (21 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 12:31:07 -0500
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (71 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 12:56:01 -0500
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (111 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 14:11:05 -0400
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (69 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 21:11:47 +0200
    • Re: Triage, heroic efforts, and economics (115 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] (Bob Olhsson) (Bob Olhsson) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:16:08 -0400

65. Unsubscribe
    • Unsubscribe (14 lines)
      From: Jack Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 13:15:26 -0400

66. Update on H.R. 5439
    • Update on H.R. 5439 (66 lines)
      From: Rob Bamberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:01:13 -0400
    • Re: Update on H.R. 5439 (102 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 12:27:06 -0400
    • Re: Update on H.R. 5439 (25 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 08:39:49 -0500

67. USB KVM's
    • USB KVM's (35 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 07:44:56 -0400
    • Re: USB KVM's (55 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:07:49 -0400
    • Re: USB KVM's (63 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:18:44 -0500
    • Re: USB KVM's (70 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:33:50 -0400
    • Re: USB KVM's (84 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:10:29 -0500

68. Vive la France
    • Vive la France (137 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 09:28:27 -0500
    • Re: Vive la France (26 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 21:50:02 -0400

69. [78-l] Bobby Blue Bland in Seattle
    • Re: [78-l] Bobby Blue Bland in Seattle (38 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:46:34 -0400
    • Re: [78-l] Bobby Blue Bland in Seattle (87 lines)
      From: Dave Nolan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:06:41 -0400
    • Re: [78-l] Bobby Blue Bland in Seattle (82 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:22:05 -0400
    • Re: [78-l] Bobby Blue Bland in Seattle (138 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:35:36 -0400
    • Re: [78-l] Bobby Blue Bland in Seattle (47 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:13:49 -0400
    • Re: [78-l] Bobby Blue Bland in Seattle (30 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:10:47 EDT

70. ^ ARSC Convention -- Who's coming?
    • Re: ^ ARSC Convention -- Who's coming? (22 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 21:14:55 -0400