ARSCLIST Archives – April 2006

1. Alternate take, "part IV", Stravinsky: "Musique de l'Histoire du Soldat"
   • Alternate take, "part IV", Stravinsky: "Musique de l'Histoire du Soldat" (35 lines)
     From: Aurora Perez <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 16:54:55 -0700
   • Re: Alternate take, "part IV", Stravinsky: "Musique de l'Histoire du Soldat" (56 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 20:51:48 -0400
   • Re: Alternate take, "part IV", Stravinsky: "Musique de l'Histoire du Soldat" (90 lines)
     From: Aurora Perez <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 14:50:10 -0700
   • Re: Alternate take, "part IV", Stravinsky: "Musique de l'Histoire du Soldat" (122 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 18:33:11 -0400
   • Re: Alternate take, "part IV", Stravinsky: "Musique de l'Histoire du Soldat" (128 lines)
     From: Aurora Perez <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 11:05:30 -0700

2. Alternate take, "part IV", Stravinsky: "Musique de l'Histoire...
   • Re: Alternate take, "part IV", Stravinsky: "Musique de l'Histoire... (112 lines)
     From: Aurora Perez <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:26:48 -0700

3. Any ARSC Members In Savannah
   • Re: Any ARSC Members In Savannah (21 lines)
     From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:37:36 -0400

4. ARSC Conference: Early-Registration Deadline
   • ARSC Conference: Early-Registration Deadline (57 lines)
     From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:42:43 -0400

5. ARSC Hotel Alert
   • ARSC Hotel Alert (31 lines)
     From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:36:39 -0500

6. ARSC Hotel Alert Update
   • ARSC Hotel Alert Update (29 lines)
     From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:26:19 -0500

7. Audio equipment cable shielding
   • Audio equipment cable shielding (29 lines)
     From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:56:40 -0500
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (64 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:21:09 +0200
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (69 lines)
     From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:29:45 -0400
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (83 lines)
     From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:32:27 -0400
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (52 lines)
     From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:38:25 -0400
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (46 lines)
     From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:47:31 -0700
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (52 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:48:21 -0400
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (47 lines)
     From: Dave Garland <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:04:33 -0500
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (67 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:19:09 -0400
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (46 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:29:48 -0400
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (36 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:56:31 +0000
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (16 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:11:27 -0400
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (37 lines)
     From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:53:15 -0500
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (66 lines)
     From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:29:31 -0400
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (69 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:32:24 -0400
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (99 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:27:39 -0400
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (28 lines)
     From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 08:16:57 -0700
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (32 lines)
     From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 08:50:51 -0700
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (92 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:50:36 -0500
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (30 lines)
     From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:49:04 -0500
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (52 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:08:07 -0500
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (70 lines)
     From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:23:46 -0400
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (66 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:22:04 -0400
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (84 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:27:14 -0400
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (41 lines)
     From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:43:43 -0400
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (99 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:41:12 -0500
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (45 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 00:17:39 +0000
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (87 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:01:50 -0400
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (27 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:26:56 -0400
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (83 lines)
     From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 01:01:55 -0500
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (30 lines)
     From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:17:30 -0700
   • Re: Audio equipment cable shielding (38 lines)
     From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:56:41 -0500

8. Australasian Sound Recordings Association Conference in August
   • Australasian Sound Recordings Association Conference in August (63 lines)
     From: Matthew Davies <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:34:44 +1000

9. Canadian Copyright (was Vinyl use and access policies
   • Re: Canadian Copyright (was Vinyl use and access policies (72 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:20:39 -0400

10. Carlos Gardel
    • Carlos Gardel (24 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 08:08:28 -0400
    • Re: Carlos Gardel (21 lines)
      From: Jack Raymond <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:46:50 -0400

11. Carlos redux
    • Carlos redux (49 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 08:26:47 -0400

12. Checksums
    • Checksums (18 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:46:25 -0400
    • Re: Checksums (57 lines)
      From: Miriam Meislik <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 09:01:00 -0400
    • Re: Checksums (40 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:12:50 -0400
    • Re: Checksums (77 lines)
      From: Miriam Meislik <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:36:23 -0400
    • Re: Checksums (59 lines)
      From: Casey, Michael T <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:06:53 -0400
    • Re: Checksums (60 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:55:11 -0700
    • Re: Checksums (30 lines)
      From: Mark Matienzo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:21:03 -0400
    • Re: Checksums (27 lines)
      From: Gary Sprung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:34:23 -0700
    • Re: Checksums (43 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:57:10 -0500

13. CLIR document/ Leader
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (92 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 11:16:37 -0500
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (130 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 22:47:36 -0500
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (32 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 21:49:01 -0700
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (35 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 00:57:13 -0400
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (40 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:44:30 -0400
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (51 lines)
      From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:12:23 -0500
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (31 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:16:41 -0500
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (53 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:20:55 -0400
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (44 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:31:45 -0400
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (58 lines)
      From: Rob Bamberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:34:58 -0400
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (32 lines)
      From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 16:28:58 +0200
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (32 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:10:34 -0700
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (54 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:36:46 -0700
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (42 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:49:08 -0700
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (31 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 11:10:27 -0500
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (39 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 12:54:53 -0400
    • Re: CLIR document/ Leader (41 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 19:18:47 -0400

14. Cocaine Habit
    • Cocaine Habit (23 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:50:48 -0400

15. Cocaine Habit - missed the point
    • Cocaine Habit - missed the point (25 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:00:54 -0400

16. Concert announcement - for those group members that would be interested.
    • Concert announcement - for those group members that would be interested. (22 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:06:19 EDT
    • Re: Concert announcement - for those group members that would be interested. (66 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:27:32 -0400

17. Curved walls in recording studio
    • Re: Curved walls in recording studio (28 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 19:54:02 -0500
    • Re: Curved walls in recording studio (20 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 20:12:45 -0500
    • Re: Curved walls in recording studio (24 lines)
      From: Language Laboratories and Archives <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 10:24:10 -0500
    • Re: Curved walls in recording studio (21 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 19:18:40 -0700

18. David Amram, was Rock and roll drumming
    • Re: David Amram, was Rock and roll drumming (35 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 10:49:04 -0500
    • Re: David Amram, was Rock and roll drumming (63 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 11:17:54 -0500
    • Re: David Amram, was Rock and roll drumming (37 lines)
      From: Peter Hirsch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 11:28:09 -0500

19. David Levine is out of the office.
    • David Levine is out of the office. (16 lines)
      From: David Levine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 21:18:06 -0700

20. DC Area ARSC event
    • DC Area ARSC event (43 lines)
      From: Bryan E Cornell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:10:20 -0400

21. Delaminating tape article
    • Re: Delaminating tape article (24 lines)
      From: rodbrown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 23:20:08 -0800
    • Re: Delaminating tape article (46 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 06:25:51 -0500
    • Re: Delaminating tape article (34 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 10:30:27 -0500
    • Re: Delaminating tape article (100 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 13:02:02 -0400
    • Re: Delaminating tape article (56 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 17:59:54 -0400
    • Re: Delaminating tape article (109 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 13:01:05 -0400

22. Did someone mention a library of Sams service folders?
    • Did someone mention a library of Sams service folders? (25 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 19:04:53 -0400

23. Donate to the Silent Auction!
    • Donate to the Silent Auction! (64 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:41:22 -0400
    • Re: Donate to the Silent Auction! (73 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 06:21:54 -0700

24. double density DVD
    • double density DVD (15 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 10:03:18 -0500
    • Re: double density DVD (22 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 11:22:38 -0400
    • Re: double density DVD (26 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 08:24:06 -0700
    • Re: double density DVD (30 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:12:13 -0700
    • Re: double density DVD (26 lines)
      From: Aaron Z Snyder <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 12:20:03 -0400

25. Dual Layer DVD
    • Re: Dual Layer DVD (27 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 14:27:56 -0500
    • Re: Dual Layer DVD (35 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 19:59:16 -0700
    • Re: Dual Layer DVD (79 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 08:51:48 -0500
    • Re: Dual Layer DVD (107 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 07:44:00 -0700
    • Re: Dual Layer DVD (26 lines)
      From: Russ Hamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 07:59:06 -0700
    • Re: Dual Layer DVD (35 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 09:25:50 -0700
    • Re: Dual Layer DVD (22 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 12:53:39 -0400
    • Re: Dual Layer DVD (34 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 10:59:37 -0700

26. DVD Longevity Factors (was TY vs Mitsui)
    • Re: DVD Longevity Factors (was TY vs Mitsui) (47 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:11:35 -0400

27. FW: ARSC Discount Tickets to Pippin in Seattle
    • FW: ARSC Discount Tickets to Pippin in Seattle (90 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:44:44 -0400

28. Fw: Spinning Hope on Incarceration Station: NY Times April 12, 2
    • Re: Fw: Spinning Hope on Incarceration Station: NY Times April 12, 2 (33 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:15:57 -0400

29. Fw: Spinning Hope on Incarceration Station: NY Times April 12, 2006
    • Fw: Spinning Hope on Incarceration Station: NY Times April 12, 2006 (186 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 13:42:35 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Spinning Hope on Incarceration Station: NY Times April 12, 2006 (22 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:35:32 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Spinning Hope on Incarceration Station: NY Times April 12, 2006 (63 lines)
      From: Pete Tinker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:43:41 -0700
    • Re: Fw: Spinning Hope on Incarceration Station: NY Times April 12, 2006 (19 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 07:41:49 -0700

30. Fw: [78-l] British copyright laws
    • Fw: [78-l] British copyright laws (551 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:12:31 -0400
    • Re: Fw: [78-l] British copyright laws (47 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:01:04 -0500
    • Re: Fw: [78-l] British copyright laws (64 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:14:25 -0400
    • Re: Fw: [78-l] British copyright laws (31 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 10:25:16 EDT

31. Fw: [match_box_blues] NBC death knell for cd ...
    • Fw: [match_box_blues] NBC death knell for cd ... (54 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 00:28:45 -0400

32. Fwd: Fw: NPR story on music response
    • Fwd: Fw: NPR story on music response (61 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 18:44:07 EDT
    • Re: Fwd: Fw: NPR story on music response (82 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:24:16 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: Fw: NPR story on music response (21 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:33:57 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: Fw: NPR story on music response (29 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:33:16 -0700

33. Fwd: Moore Hotel
    • Fwd: Moore Hotel (47 lines)
      From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:02:47 -0500

34. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Alternate take, "part IV", Stravinsky: "Musique de l'Histoire...
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Alternate take, "part IV", Stravinsky: "Musique de l'Histoire... (103 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 16:43:15 EDT

35. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: Fw: NPR story on music response
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: Fw: NPR story on music response (93 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:09:43 EDT
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: Fw: NPR story on music response (100 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:02:00 -0700

36. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competitio...
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competitio... (185 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:21:15 EDT

37. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orc...
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orc... (76 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 14:33:45 EDT

38. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition -
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition - (166 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 23:44:25 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition - (191 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:47:30 -0400

39. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition - 1929
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (171 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:23:24 EDT
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (200 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:41:47 EDT
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (37 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:01:18 -0400

40. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded ...
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded ... (61 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 19:27:40 EDT
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded ... (46 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 10:58:29 -0400

41. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition - 1929
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (106 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:04:26 EDT
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (134 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:17:10 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (61 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:23:44 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (164 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:29:03 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (63 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:20:12 +0000
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (115 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 07:00:43 -0700
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (81 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:41:22 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (194 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:24:00 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (75 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:54:25 +0000

42. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur...
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur... (57 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 18:31:25 EDT
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur... (30 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:20:28 -0500
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur... (24 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:29:36 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur... (38 lines)
      From: Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:42:25 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur... (57 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 11:42:07 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur... (55 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 07:58:47 -0700
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur... (36 lines)
      From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 17:34:17 +0200
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur... (47 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 08:33:30 -0700
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur... (50 lines)
      From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 17:40:55 +0200
    • Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur... (88 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 12:07:47 -0400

43. GREAT NPR story on SF Earthquake and SPEECH cylinders
    • GREAT NPR story on SF Earthquake and SPEECH cylinders (18 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:30:12 EDT

44. Hall specific tempi and reorchestrations (was The waltz)
    • Re: Hall specific tempi and reorchestrations (was The waltz) (68 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:38:26 -0400
    • Re: Hall specific tempi and reorchestrations (was The waltz) (32 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 20:45:04 +0000
    • Re: Hall specific tempi and reorchestrations (was The waltz) (52 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 15:13:45 -0400

45. How many of us in unions? (was Poor sounding concert halls.)
    • Re: How many of us in unions? (was Poor sounding concert halls.) (153 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:43:36 -0700

46. How many of us in unions? Poor sounding concert halls.
    • Re: How many of us in unions? Poor sounding concert halls. (40 lines)
      From: Bob Wasserman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:57:08 -0500
    • Re: How many of us in unions? Poor sounding concert halls. (42 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:37:08 -0700
    • Re: How many of us in unions? Poor sounding concert halls. (89 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:15:53 -0400
    • Re: How many of us in unions? Poor sounding concert halls. (40 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:39:21 -0700
    • Re: How many of us in unions? Poor sounding concert halls. (66 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:12:37 -0500

47. Inventor battle: Edison vs Bell
    • Inventor battle: Edison vs Bell (20 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 17:43:39 EST
    • Re: Inventor battle: Edison vs Bell (23 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 20:02:35 -0400

48. Janis--was: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929
    • Janis--was: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (43 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:19:24 -0400
    • Re: Janis--was: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (77 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:04:48 -0700
    • Re: Janis--was: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (105 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:56:23 -0400
    • Re: Janis--was: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (51 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 10:49:09 -0700

49. Job available
    • Job available (80 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 17:34:06 -0400

50. Job Posting
    • Job Posting (107 lines)
      From: Preston Everett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:02:05 -0500
    • Re: Job Posting (129 lines)
      From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:08:50 -0500
    • Re: Job Posting (137 lines)
      From: Preston Everett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 11:58:33 -0500

51. Library of Congress Sound Registry
    • Library of Congress Sound Registry (34 lines)
      From: Joel Bresler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:42:59 -0400
    • Re: Library of Congress Sound Registry (47 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:42:55 -0700

52. Liner notes/booklet: Decca DA-402, Lost Horizon?
    • Liner notes/booklet: Decca DA-402, Lost Horizon? (21 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:45:14 -0700
    • Re: Liner notes/booklet: Decca DA-402, Lost Horizon? (29 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 23:50:16 -0400
    • Re: Liner notes/booklet: Decca DA-402, Lost Horizon? (19 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:06:14 -0700

53. Locating audio recordings of Marie and/or Pierre Curie
    • Locating audio recordings of Marie and/or Pierre Curie (30 lines)
      From: Mark Matienzo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:29:01 -0400

54. media request: new chief of preservation at LOC
    • media request: new chief of preservation at LOC (87 lines)
      From: Michael Erard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:15:01 -0500

55. Medical grade CD-Rs
    • Medical grade CD-Rs (26 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 08:12:51 -0400
    • Re: Medical grade CD-Rs (49 lines)
      From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 08:56:04 -0500
    • Re: Medical grade CD-Rs (35 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 07:40:51 -0700
    • Re: Medical grade CD-Rs (51 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:09:18 -0700
    • Re: Medical grade CD-Rs (65 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:58:54 -0400
    • Re: Medical grade CD-Rs (67 lines)
      From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:25:09 -0500
    • Re: Medical grade CD-Rs (16 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:40:46 -0400
    • Re: Medical grade CD-Rs (21 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:45:42 -0400
    • Re: Medical grade CD-Rs (25 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:13:34 -0700
    • Re: Medical grade CD-Rs (30 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:26:01 -0700

56. Medical grade CD-Rs and gold DVD-Rs
    • Re: Medical grade CD-Rs and gold DVD-Rs (79 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:31:07 -0400
    • Re: Medical grade CD-Rs and gold DVD-Rs (33 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:41:37 -0500
    • Re: Medical grade CD-Rs and gold DVD-Rs (102 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:49:54 -0400
    • Re: Medical grade CD-Rs and gold DVD-Rs (121 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:58:35 -0400

57. Music Library Association 2006 awards announcement
    • Music Library Association 2006 awards announcement (100 lines)
      From: Ken Calkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 11:51:47 -0700

58. Music Library Association Call for Papers
    • Music Library Association Call for Papers (59 lines)
      From: Mark McKnight <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:00:20 -0500

59. New CD Report NIST
    • Re: New CD Report NIST (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:02:49 -0800
    • Re: New CD Report NIST (73 lines)
      From: Bob Conrad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:25:06 -0400
    • Re: New CD Report NIST (63 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:38:32 -0400
    • Re: New CD Report NIST (75 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:01:47 -0700
    • Re: New CD Report NIST (121 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:04:39 EDT
    • Re: New CD Report NIST (61 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:28:35 -0400
    • Re: New CD Report NIST (82 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:27:08 -0400

60. New National Recording Registry just announced
    • New National Recording Registry just announced (593 lines)
      From: Stephen C Leggett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:58:57 -0400
    • Re: New National Recording Registry just announced (85 lines)
      From: Stephen C Leggett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:40:43 -0400
    • Re: New National Recording Registry just announced (923 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 11:48:33 -0700
    • Re: New National Recording Registry just announced (106 lines)
      From: Bob Conrad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:57:26 -0400
    • Re: New National Recording Registry just announced (677 lines)
      From: Stephen C Leggett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:29:02 -0400
    • Re: New National Recording Registry just announced (32 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:42:16 -0700
    • Re: New National Recording Registry just announced (33 lines)
      From: Russ Hamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:55:48 -0700
    • Re: New National Recording Registry just announced (75 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:53:10 -0400
    • Re: New National Recording Registry just announced (33 lines)
      From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 22:03:27 +0200
    • Re: New National Recording Registry just announced (124 lines)
      From: Stephen C Leggett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:09:24 -0400
    • Re: New National Recording Registry just announced (149 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:44:23 -0400
    • Re: New National Recording Registry just announced (136 lines)
      From: Bob Conrad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:49:17 -0400
    • Re: New National Recording Registry just announced (19 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 21:16:34 -0400
    • Re: New National Recording Registry just announced (27 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 07:35:33 -0700
    • Re: New National Recording Registry just announced (55 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 11:04:21 -0400
    • Re: New National Recording Registry just announced (64 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:02:38 -0400
    • Re: New National Recording Registry just announced (73 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:21:41 -0700

61. New U.S. Copyright Laws
    • New U.S. Copyright Laws (23 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:27:18 -0400
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (26 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:12:18 -0400
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (33 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:37:08 -0400
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (43 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:23:04 -0400
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (63 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:13:13 -0700
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (35 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 21:19:04 -0400
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (32 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:30:06 -0700
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (55 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 21:58:03 -0400
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (77 lines)
      From: Sam Brylawski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:10:25 -0400
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (93 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:47:24 -0400
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (33 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:51:57 -0700
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (61 lines)
      From: JJJJ <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:32:43 -0400
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (41 lines)
      From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:44:13 -0500
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (32 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:51:45 -0500
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (22 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:43:16 +0000
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (28 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:59:18 -0400
    • Re: New U.S. Copyright Laws (32 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:01:01 -0700

62. OTR Convention in Cincinnati
    • Re: OTR Convention in Cincinnati (16 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:47:53 EDT
    • Re: OTR Convention in Cincinnati (22 lines)
      From: Neal Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:27:05 -0700
    • Re: OTR Convention in Cincinnati (35 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 17:16:35 -0400
    • Re: OTR Convention in Cincinnati (51 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:50:35 -0400
    • Re: OTR Convention in Cincinnati (79 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:43:15 -0500

63. Poor sounding concert halls.
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (117 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 21:52:25 -0400
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (27 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 20:47:04 -0700
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (139 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 11:05:01 -0400
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (26 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 12:01:10 -0400
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (135 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:55:22 -0400
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (35 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:26:49 -0700
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (52 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 01:06:24 -0500
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (41 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:28:41 -0500
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (43 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 09:01:37 -0700
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (35 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:21:20 -0400
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (38 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 08:25:58 -0700
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (36 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:51:40 -0400
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (61 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:07:41 -0700
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (24 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:58:28 -0400
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (45 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:21:27 -0400
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (68 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:43:28 -0700
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (25 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:17:22 -0700
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (64 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:12:20 -0700
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (51 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 22:16:09 -0500
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (52 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:37:13 -0700
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (58 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 23:47:02 -0400
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (33 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:17:32 -0700
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (29 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:29:38 -0700
    • Re: Poor sounding concert halls. (26 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 07:52:38 -0400

64. portable sound recording devices
    • portable sound recording devices (27 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:24:36 -0700
    • Re: portable sound recording devices (56 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:39:13 -0400
    • Re: portable sound recording devices (46 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:17:56 -0700
    • Re: portable sound recording devices (26 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:22:26 -0700
    • Re: portable sound recording devices (34 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:46:59 -0700
    • Re: portable sound recording devices (33 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:10:31 -0700
    • Re: portable sound recording devices (51 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:25:36 -0700
    • Re: portable sound recording devices (66 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:34:08 -1000
    • Re: portable sound recording devices (47 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:07:01 -0400
    • Re: portable sound recording devices (68 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:44:49 -0400
    • Re: portable sound recording devices (32 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:29:38 -0400
    • Re: portable sound recording devices (31 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:55:31 -0700
    • Re: portable sound recording devices (100 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:01:41 -1000
    • Re: portable sound recording devices (121 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:26:21 -1000
    • Re: portable sound recording devices (43 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:39:39 -0400
    • Re: portable sound recording devices (34 lines)
      From: Alec McLane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:45:31 -0400
    • Re: portable sound recording devices (56 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 08:46:49 -0700

65. Preservationists say policy-makers should be more alarmed about the losses
    • Re: Preservationists say policy-makers should be more alarmed about the losses (21 lines)
      From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:23:58 -0400

66. Question for our experts...
    • Question for our experts... (24 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:38:12 -0400
    • Re: Question for our experts... (48 lines)
      From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:29:24 +0200
    • Re: Question for our experts... (59 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:51:06 -0400

67. Radio Dismuke Broadcast with Kurt Nauck
    • Radio Dismuke Broadcast with Kurt Nauck (128 lines)
      From: Dismuke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 15:33:12 -0700

68. RCA symphonic work competition - 1929
    • RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (26 lines)
      From: Paul Charosh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 11:19:39 EDT
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (65 lines)
      From: Alec McLane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:03:53 -0400
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (89 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:24:03 -0400
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (74 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:25:14 -0400
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (17 lines)
      From: Paul Charosh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:38:17 EDT
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (105 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:42:40 -0400
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (97 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:47:42 -0400
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (28 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:07:20 -0500
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (105 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:08:29 +0000
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (24 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:18:59 -0500
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (39 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 23:14:43 -0500
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (53 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 23:46:50 -0500
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (20 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 07:39:34 -0700
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (25 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:45:23 -0400
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (30 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:25:03 -0500
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (33 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:44:18 -0400
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (39 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:50:44 -0400
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (38 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:04:02 -0700
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (50 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:32:47 -0500
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (43 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 06:11:42 -0700
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (59 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 06:51:16 -0700
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (56 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:52:18 -0400
    • Re: RCA symphonic work competition - 1929 (63 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:55:08 -0700

69. Recording bagpipes (was:portable sound recording devices)
    • Re: Recording bagpipes (was:portable sound recording devices) (45 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:53:07 -0700
    • Re: Recording bagpipes (was:portable sound recording devices) (76 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:51:10 -0700
    • Re: Recording bagpipes (was:portable sound recording devices) (32 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 05:51:18 -0700
    • Re: Recording bagpipes (was:portable sound recording devices) (50 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:42:41 -0400

70. Researcher seeking "Il mio tesoro" from Mozart:Don Giovanni
    • Researcher seeking "Il mio tesoro" from Mozart:Don Giovanni (33 lines)
      From: Aurora Perez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 15:23:07 -0700
    • Re: Researcher seeking "Il mio tesoro" from Mozart:Don Giovanni (46 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 15:42:40 -0700

71. Rock and roll drumming
    • Re: Rock and roll drumming (70 lines)
      From: Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 08:38:04 -0500

72. scotch 227
    • Re: scotch 227 (77 lines)
      From: Bridavsky, Michael G <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 12:08:48 -0400
    • Re: scotch 227 (94 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 17:49:40 -0400
    • Re: scotch 227 (111 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 22:11:21 -0400
    • Re: scotch 227 (158 lines)
      From: Bridavsky, Michael G <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:49:34 -0400

73. Some sanity
    • Some sanity (38 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:40:55 -0500

74. Steve Mann was Janis
    • Re: Steve Mann was Janis (30 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:05:31 -0400
    • Re: Steve Mann was Janis (35 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:37:05 -0400

75. Still need a roommate for ARSC conference?
    • Still need a roommate for ARSC conference? (26 lines)
      From: Alice Johnston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 13:28:07 -0500

76. The waltz
    • Re: The waltz (22 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 20:40:38 -0500
    • Re: The waltz (29 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 23:33:34 -0500
    • Re: The waltz (36 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 23:35:55 -0500
    • Re: The waltz (34 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 08:00:17 -0700
    • Re: The waltz (20 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 21:18:06 -0400
    • Re: The waltz (34 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 19:29:47 -0700
    • Re: The waltz (26 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 22:30:16 -0400

77. The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur ...
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur ... (74 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 23:45:05 -0500
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur ... (45 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 21:04:19 -0800
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur ... (33 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 10:02:13 -0500

78. The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fie
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fie (45 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 11:59:25 -0400

79. The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler)
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (38 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 19:27:53 -0500
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (26 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 19:49:56 -0500
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (57 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 20:10:29 -0500
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (45 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 20:34:00 -0500
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (52 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 18:59:15 -0800
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (34 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 22:06:11 -0500
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (41 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 19:22:43 -0800
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (62 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 07:57:43 -0500
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (127 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 10:24:55 -0400
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (24 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:54:11 -0500
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (19 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 19:21:29 -0700
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (54 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:12:44 -0700
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (42 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:28:54 -0400
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (40 lines)
      From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 18:55:54 +0200
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (57 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:28:21 -0500
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (34 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:35:48 -0500
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (30 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:42:05 -0500
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (29 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 14:05:24 -0400
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (26 lines)
      From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 18:23:08 -0700
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (48 lines)
      From: Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:27:31 -0400
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (38 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 11:30:25 -0400
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (40 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:09:47 -0700
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (34 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 20:54:29 +0000
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (37 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 07:52:17 -0500
    • Re: The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur Fiedler) (49 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 20:41:50 +0000

80. TY vs Mitsui
    • TY vs Mitsui (23 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:13:08 -0400
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (39 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:40:00 -0400
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (38 lines)
      From: Milan P. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:44:15 +0200
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (31 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:44:05 -0700
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (51 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:32:43 -0400
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (49 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:35:36 -0400
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (33 lines)
      From: John Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:50:03 -0700
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (30 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:06:26 -0700
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (28 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:06:36 -0700
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (71 lines)
      From: Prentice, Will <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:38:48 +0100
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (87 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:10:18 -0400
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (107 lines)
      From: Prentice, Will <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:28:21 +0100
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (46 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:47:26 -0400
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (36 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:14:42 -0700
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (67 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:42:42 -0400
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (44 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:47:53 -0400
    • TY vs Mitsui (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:41:11 -0400
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (77 lines)
      From: Prentice, Will <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:03:11 +0100
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui (82 lines)
      From: Prentice, Will <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:14:57 +0100

81. TY vs Mitsui. SUmmary
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui. SUmmary (102 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:13:25 -0400
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui. SUmmary (120 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:36:07 -0400
    • Re: TY vs Mitsui. SUmmary (184 lines)
      From: Prentice, Will <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:50:33 +0100

82. Type II cassettes
    • Type II cassettes (31 lines)
      From: Casey, Michael T <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:34:29 -0400

83. Valéry Gergiev
    • Valéry Gergiev (49 lines)
      From: Lewanne Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:29:37 -0400

84. Vinyl use and access policies
    • Vinyl use and access policies (41 lines)
      From: Lisa Colaianne <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:16:33 -0400
    • Re: Vinyl use and access policies (70 lines)
      From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:50:44 -0400
    • Re: Vinyl use and access policies (62 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:32:50 -0400
    • Re: Vinyl use and access policies (65 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:35:52 -0700
    • Re: Vinyl use and access policies (46 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:44:48 -0400
    • Re: Vinyl use and access policies (83 lines)
      From: Bill Schurk <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:26:13 -0700
    • Re: Vinyl use and access policies (20 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:08:37 -0400
    • Re: Vinyl use and access policies (59 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:12:57 -0700
    • Re: Vinyl use and access policies (28 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:59:38 -0700
    • Re: Vinyl use and access policies (97 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 06:10:01 -0400
    • Re: Vinyl use and access policies (30 lines)
      From: Bill Schurk <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:25:51 -0700
    • Re: Vinyl use and access policies (49 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:55:20 -0400
    • Re: Vinyl use and access policies (54 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:59:54 +0200
    • Re: Vinyl use and access policies (43 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:15:56 +0000
    • Re: Vinyl use and access policies (37 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:02:07 -0700

85. Webster Cinch-Jones Connectors
    • Re: Webster Cinch-Jones Connectors (53 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 18:37:42 -0500

86. What's the thinking on a the Lightscribe?
    • What's the thinking on a the Lightscribe? (20 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 08:43:40 -0400
    • Re: What's the thinking on a the Lightscribe? (38 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 08:07:44 -0700
    • Re: What's the thinking on a the Lightscribe? (40 lines)
      From: Pete Tinker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 10:21:02 -0700
    • Re: What's the thinking on a the Lightscribe? (35 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 15:36:36 -0400

87. Which U.S. Orchestra Recorded First?
    • Re: Which U.S. Orchestra Recorded First? (101 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 16:16:28 +0200
    • Re: Which U.S. Orchestra Recorded First? (162 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:52:19 -0400
    • Re: Which U.S. Orchestra Recorded First? (24 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:31:46 -0400
    • Re: Which U.S. Orchestra Recorded First? (30 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 07:34:33 -0500
    • Re: Which U.S. Orchestra Recorded First? (51 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:39:40 -0400
    • Re: Which U.S. Orchestra Recorded First? (57 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 11:06:13 -0400
    • Re: Which U.S. Orchestra Recorded First? (80 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 11:51:38 -0400
    • Re: Which U.S. Orchestra Recorded First? (27 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:10:23 -0500

88. Windows media player 9
    • Windows media player 9 (24 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 18:12:24 -0500
    • Re: Windows media player 9 (37 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 18:28:43 -0500
    • Re: Windows media player 9 (46 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 17:36:13 -0600
    • Re: Windows media player 9 (39 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 17:45:49 -0600
    • Re: Windows media player 9 (32 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 15:54:18 -0800
    • Re: Windows media player 9 (26 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 19:54:28 -0600
    • Re: Windows media player 9 (22 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 10:14:47 EDT
    • Re: Windows media player 9 (30 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 07:58:48 -0700
    • Re: Windows media player 9 (43 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 11:24:00 -0400
    • Re: Windows media player 9 (82 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 10:46:43 -0600
    • Re: Windows media player 9 (93 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 12:55:39 -0400
    • Re: Windows media player 9 (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 10:12:36 -0700

89. [Fwd: Re: [ARSCLIST] Valerie Wellington (was Janis--was: RCA symphonic)]
    • [Fwd: Re: [ARSCLIST] Valerie Wellington (was Janis--was: RCA symphonic)] (93 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:17:07 -0400
    • Re: [Fwd: Re: [ARSCLIST] Valerie Wellington (was Janis--was: RCA symphonic)] (106 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 00:22:37 -0400

90. ^ Medical grade CD-Rs
    • Re: ^ Medical grade CD-Rs (22 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:24:09 -0400

91. ^ The waltz
    • Re: ^ The waltz (17 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 23:31:12 -0500

92. ^ Windows media player 9
    • Re: ^ Windows media player 9 (23 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 18:36:17 -0500
    • Re: ^ Windows media player 9 (20 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:42:24 -0500