ARSCLIST Archives – January 2006

1. 101 strings collection up for grabs LA area
   • Re: 101 strings collection up for grabs LA area (83 lines)
     From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 08:18:39 -0600
   • Re: 101 strings collection up for grabs LA area (33 lines)
     From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 08:46:38 -0600

2. 24/96 media players
   • 24/96 media players (55 lines)
     From: Prentice, Will <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:56:57 -0000
   • Re: 24/96 media players (74 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:11:44 -0600

3. 78s on eBay
   • 78s on eBay (23 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:38:45 -0500
   • Re: 78s on eBay (25 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:30:31 -0500
   • Re: 78s on eBay (58 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:53:36 -0500
   • Re: 78s on eBay (25 lines)
     From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:59:46 -0800
   • Re: 78s on eBay (60 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:58:17 -0500
   • Re: 78s on eBay (32 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:24:36 -0500
   • Re: 78s on eBay (31 lines)
     From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:21:46 -0500
   • Re: 78s on eBay (37 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:37:31 -0500

4. A Christmas Carol - reissues
   • A Christmas Carol - reissues (55 lines)
     From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:35:50 -0500
   • Re: A Christmas Carol - reissues (76 lines)
     From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:14:32 -0500
   • Re: A Christmas Carol - reissues (111 lines)
     From: Matthew Barton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:25:14 -0500
   • Re: A Christmas Carol - reissues (100 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:37:35 -0500

5. A Player Pianists Responsibilities
   • Re: A Player Pianists Responsibilities (80 lines)
     From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:37:52 -0500

6. about Robert Johnson
   • about Robert Johnson (163 lines)
     From: Morris Martin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:17:08 -0600

7. Ampex made bargain brands
   • Ampex made bargain brands (52 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 10:56:55 -0500
   • Re: Ampex made bargain brands (65 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 01:40:51 -0500

8. And speaking of cataloging
   • And speaking of cataloging (19 lines)
     From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:58:17 -0600

9. ARSC Announces New Preservation Grants Program
   • ARSC Announces New Preservation Grants Program (65 lines)
     From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:50:47 -0500

10. ARSC Membership 2006
    • ARSC Membership 2006 (55 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:30:36 -0500

11. ARSC Newsletter Deadlines
    • ARSC Newsletter Deadlines (37 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:39:03 -0800
    • Re: ARSC Newsletter Deadlines (43 lines)
      From: Nancy Seeger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:00:17 -0500

12. AVRL
    • AVRL (21 lines)
      From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:15:48 -0500
    • Re: AVRL (28 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 19:09:33 -0500

13. backup software
    • Re: backup software (67 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:28:34 -0800
    • Re: backup software (75 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:58:12 -0800
    • Re: backup software (87 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:18:49 -0600

14. backup software (was: creating access cd's)
    • Re: backup software (was: creating access cd's) (42 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:02:02 -0700

15. Broadcast Equipment Manuals that are going begging--Last call
    • Broadcast Equipment Manuals that are going begging--Last call (34 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:46:05 -0500
    • Re: Broadcast Equipment Manuals that are going begging--Last call (48 lines)
      From: Alyssa Ryvers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 23:42:01 -0500
    • Re: Broadcast Equipment Manuals that are going begging--Last call (56 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:10:23 -0500
    • Re: Broadcast Equipment Manuals that are going begging--Last call (28 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:05:07 -0500
    • Re: Broadcast Equipment Manuals that are going begging--Last call (68 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:38:31 -0600
    • Re: Broadcast Equipment Manuals that are going begging--Last call (69 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:11:57 -0500

16. Brunswick Records rights
    • Brunswick Records rights (20 lines)
      From: Chad Hunter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:48:37 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights (27 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:56:27 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights (51 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:56:30 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights (49 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:15:15 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights (61 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:52:23 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights (48 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:49:02 -0500

17. Brunswick Records rights/Universal
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (44 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:04:04 -0800
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (68 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:13:00 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (90 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:32:46 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (37 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:54:24 +0000
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (27 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:33:10 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (28 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:21:05 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (67 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:36:12 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (28 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:06:44 -0800
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (28 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:10:23 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (44 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:24:15 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (68 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:33:10 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (36 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:37:17 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (28 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:49:22 -0800
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (30 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:17:10 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (44 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:34:55 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (36 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:37:12 +0000
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (33 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 22:35:00 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (33 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 22:45:26 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (40 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 22:57:54 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (43 lines)
      From: Bob Conrad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:26:08 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (30 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 23:40:08 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (105 lines)
      From: Bob Conrad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:30:59 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (36 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 21:51:36 -0800
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (49 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 01:21:36 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (27 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:38:24 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (29 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:38:14 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (30 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:00:45 EST
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (132 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:35:46 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (26 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:37:56 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (28 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:54:54 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (43 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:08:36 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (37 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:14:32 -0800
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (30 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:29:33 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:51:13 EST
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (41 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:12:56 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (27 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:12:08 -0800
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (29 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:36:12 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (28 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:36:57 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (40 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:41:02 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (33 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:50:42 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (35 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:55:06 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (22 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:56:44 -0800
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (28 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 23:08:04 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (41 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:11:54 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (92 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 08:28:46 -0600
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (22 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 08:33:11 -0600
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (41 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 08:15:51 -0700
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (73 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:34:17 -0800
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (92 lines)
      From: Bob Conrad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:09:49 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (42 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:04:44 -0800
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (67 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:22:54 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (57 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:21:12 -0600
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (75 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:36:32 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (69 lines)
      From: Bob Conrad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:03:26 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (79 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:25:02 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (30 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:23:34 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (56 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:28:10 -0800
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (49 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:18:44 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (40 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:49:33 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (55 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:09:41 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (25 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:16:50 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (46 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:35:36 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (33 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:36:07 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (29 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:41:33 -0800
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (68 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:20:54 -0600
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (33 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:01:43 -0600
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (26 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:22:35 -0600
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (34 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:04:26 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (37 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:14:36 -0500
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (27 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:04:10 -0800
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (43 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:36:29 -0500

18. Brunswick Records rights/Universal now broadcasting and copyrights
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal now broadcasting and copyrights (30 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:17:23 -0600
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal now broadcasting and copyrights (38 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:11:42 -0800
    • Re: Brunswick Records rights/Universal now broadcasting and copyrights (28 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:22:56 -0500

19. Buddy Rich album songs running order needed
    • Buddy Rich album songs running order needed (27 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:01:02 -0500
    • Re: Buddy Rich album songs running order needed (39 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 19:01:06 -0500
    • Re: Buddy Rich album songs running order needed (53 lines)
      From: Dr. Cheryl Thurber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:11:26 -0800
    • Re: Buddy Rich album songs running order needed (79 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 20:35:27 -0500

20. Canadian music giant funds battle against RIAA
    • Canadian music giant funds battle against RIAA (56 lines)
      From: Prentice, Will <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:37:44 -0000

21. Cassette surgery
    • Cassette surgery (23 lines)
      From: Don Share <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:54:12 -0500
    • Re: Cassette surgery (65 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:48:25 -0500
    • Re: Cassette surgery (92 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:36:52 -0500

22. Cassette surgery -- paging Dr. Hess
    • Cassette surgery -- paging Dr. Hess (28 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:32:19 -0500
    • Re: Cassette surgery -- paging Dr. Hess (44 lines)
      From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:08:24 -0500
    • Re: Cassette surgery -- paging Dr. Hess (38 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:19:08 -0800
    • Re: Cassette surgery -- paging Dr. Hess (89 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:20:37 -0500
    • Re: Cassette surgery -- paging Dr. Hess (28 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:28:45 -0500
    • Re: Cassette surgery -- paging Dr. Hess (93 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:10:58 -0500
    • Re: Cassette surgery -- paging Dr. Hess (53 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:16:40 -0800
    • Re: Cassette surgery -- paging Dr. Hess (40 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:56:18 -0700
    • Re: Cassette surgery -- paging Dr. Hess (54 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:28:41 -0500
    • Re: Cassette surgery -- paging Dr. Hess (49 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:53:31 -0500
    • Re: Cassette surgery -- paging Dr. Hess (77 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:37:39 -0500
    • Re: Cassette surgery -- paging Dr. Hess (81 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:01:46 -0500

23. CD Longevity
    • Re: CD Longevity (42 lines)
      From: Jos Van Dyck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:29:04 +0100
    • Re: CD Longevity (63 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 07:32:22 -0500
    • Re: CD Longevity (33 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 07:45:58 -0800
    • Re: CD Longevity (76 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:44:13 -0500
    • Re: CD Longevity (46 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:07:59 -0800

24. CD Longevity (and cataloging)
    • Re: CD Longevity (and cataloging) (23 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:16:30 -0600
    • Re: CD Longevity (and cataloging) (44 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:35:06 -0500

25. CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memor
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memor (59 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:04:33 -0500
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memor (75 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:27:56 -0500
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memor (98 lines)
      From: Bob Conrad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:56:50 -0500
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memor (129 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 07:27:09 -0500

26. CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more)
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more) (40 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:54:38 -0500
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more) (67 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:14:33 -0500
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more) (54 lines)
      From: Bob Conrad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:27:08 -0500
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more) (81 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:35:07 -0500
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more) (31 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:56:44 -0500
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more) (46 lines)
      From: Bob Conrad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:04:09 -0500
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more) (76 lines)
      From: Bob Conrad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:14:33 -0500
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more) (27 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:14:39 -0500
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more) (31 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:31:50 -0500
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more) (59 lines)
      From: Gary Sprung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:32:17 -0800
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more) (41 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:48:01 -0800
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more) (53 lines)
      From: Bob Conrad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:14:25 -0500
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more) (68 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:46:47 -0500
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more) (38 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:00:17 -0800
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more) (30 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:05:30 -0800
    • Re: CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more) (41 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:37:43 -0600

27. CD write speed & CD-R Longevity
    • CD write speed & CD-R Longevity (37 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:16:54 -0500

28. CD writing speed
    • CD writing speed (35 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 07:29:07 -0500
    • Re: CD writing speed (19 lines)
      From: Jos Van Dyck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:23:40 +0100
    • Re: CD writing speed (37 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:05:42 -0500
    • Re: CD writing speed (42 lines)
      From: seva <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:33:49 -0500
    • Re: CD writing speed (36 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 08:19:40 -0800
    • Re: CD writing speed (62 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:39:10 -0500
    • Re: CD writing speed (50 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 08:43:30 -0800
    • Re: CD writing speed (48 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:22:48 -0800
    • Re: CD writing speed (37 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:01:13 -0500
    • Re: CD writing speed (57 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:55:15 -0800
    • Re: CD writing speed (34 lines)
      From: seva <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 16:09:21 -0500
    • Re: CD writing speed (43 lines)
      From: seva <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 16:12:00 -0500
    • Re: CD writing speed (44 lines)
      From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:25:24 -0500
    • Re: CD writing speed (24 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:48:03 -0500
    • Re: CD writing speed (24 lines)
      From: Jos Van Dyck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:53:17 +0100
    • Re: CD writing speed (32 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:44:04 -0800
    • Re: CD writing speed (53 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:58:31 -0500
    • Re: CD writing speed (45 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:18:12 -0800
    • Re: CD writing speed (49 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:05:02 -0500
    • Re: CD writing speed (53 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:09:52 -0500
    • Re: CD writing speed (25 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:08:54 -0500
    • Re: CD writing speed (30 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:32:32 -0800
    • Re: CD writing speed (36 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 06:16:43 -0500
    • Re: CD writing speed (46 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:51:41 +0000
    • Re: CD writing speed (29 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:53:51 +0000
    • Re: CD writing speed (47 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:39:09 +0000
    • Re: CD writing speed (32 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 07:23:45 -0800
    • Re: CD writing speed (36 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:10:42 +0000
    • Re: CD writing speed (30 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:31:20 -0500
    • Re: CD writing speed (46 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:27:03 -0800

29. CD writing speed - long reply
    • Re: CD writing speed - long reply (65 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 08:05:32 -0800

30. CDR /DVD R Burners
    • CDR /DVD R Burners (36 lines)
      From: McCormick, Kathleen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:45:46 -0500
    • Re: CDR /DVD R Burners (58 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:41:23 -0800
    • Re: CDR /DVD R Burners (61 lines)
      From: John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:53:24 -0600
    • Re: CDR /DVD R Burners (29 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:42:04 EST
    • Re: CDR /DVD R Burners (38 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:31:28 -0800

31. CDR Serial Number
    • CDR Serial Number (27 lines)
      From: Francesco Martinelli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:55:23 +0100
    • Re: CDR Serial Number (43 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 07:21:28 -0800
    • Re: CDR Serial Number (24 lines)
      From: Francesco Martinelli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:04:14 +0100
    • Re: CDR Serial Number (27 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 20:17:50 EST
    • Re: CDR Serial Number (46 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 22:19:10 -0500
    • Re: CDR Serial Number (66 lines)
      From: Bewley, Nigel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:22:02 -0000
    • Re: CDR Serial Number (76 lines)
      From: Francesco Martinelli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:53:24 +0100

32. Charles W. Clark
    • Charles W. Clark (120 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:29:18 -0500
    • Re: Charles W. Clark (44 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:57:32 -0500

33. Clark confusion
    • Clark confusion (19 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:06:00 -0500

34. Columbia 7" 33-1/3 discs
    • Columbia 7" 33-1/3 discs (24 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:58:53 -0500
    • Re: Columbia 7" 33-1/3 discs (30 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:07:52 EST
    • Re: Columbia 7" 33-1/3 discs (39 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:21:32 +0100

35. Compact metal shelving for audio collection
    • Compact metal shelving for audio collection (21 lines)
      From: Bronwyn Officer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:00:23 +1300
    • Re: Compact metal shelving for audio collection (44 lines)
      From: Christina Hostetter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:01:35 -0500
    • Re: Compact metal shelving for audio collection (53 lines)
      From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 08:04:56 -0600

36. Compressed files & differences (was something else)
    • Re: Compressed files & differences (was something else) (81 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:12:02 -0500
    • Re: Compressed files & differences (was something else) (91 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:53:37 -0500

37. Copyrights, reissues, etc.
    • Copyrights, reissues, etc. (25 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:50:58 -0600
    • Re: Copyrights, reissues, etc. (52 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:08:27 -0800
    • Re: Copyrights, reissues, etc. (49 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:45:52 +0000

38. Correction: Washington DC ARSC/AES Program
    • Correction: Washington DC ARSC/AES Program (46 lines)
      From: Bryan E Cornell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:50:09 -0500

39. creating access cd's
    • creating access cd's (36 lines)
      From: Mark W. Downs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:37:39 -0600
    • Re: creating access cd's (74 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:41:54 -0800
    • Re: creating access cd's (62 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:49:30 -0500
    • Re: creating access cd's (98 lines)
      From: Mark W. Downs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:56:48 -0600
    • Re: creating access cd's (37 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:29:21 -0800
    • Re: creating access cd's (36 lines)
      From: Konrad Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:45:22 -0500
    • Re: creating access cd's (72 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:56:40 -0800
    • Re: creating access cd's (62 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:58:36 -0800
    • Re: creating access cd's (34 lines)
      From: Mark W. Downs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:19:42 -0600
    • Re: creating access cd's (59 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:50:29 -0800
    • Re: creating access cd's (40 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:28:41 -0700
    • Re: creating access cd's (70 lines)
      From: Joseph Conway <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:56:47 -0700
    • Re: creating access cd's (53 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:26:03 -0500
    • Re: creating access cd's (47 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:52:21 +0000
    • Re: creating access cd's (50 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:10:56 -0800
    • Re: creating access cd's (25 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:22:22 -0800
    • Re: creating access cd's (19 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:17:09 -0500
    • Re: creating access cd's (66 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:34:10 -0500
    • Re: creating access cd's (30 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:59:01 -0500
    • Re: creating access cd's (44 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 23:07:44 -0500
    • Re: creating access cd's (33 lines)
      From: Milan p. Milovanovic <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:13:03 +0100
    • Re: creating access cd's (40 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:39:41 +0000
    • Re: creating access cd's (45 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:45:12 +0000
    • Re: creating access cd's (48 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:47:40 +0000
    • Re: creating access cd's (35 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:17:50 -0800
    • Re: creating access cd's (33 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:04:58 -0500
    • Re: creating access cd's (57 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:06:54 -0800

40. dBx compander system
    • Re: dBx compander system (27 lines)
      From: Jos Van Dyck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:54:13 +0100

41. Deadline Reminder -- ARSC Research Grants Program
    • Deadline Reminder -- ARSC Research Grants Program (65 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:06:44 -0500

42. Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal
    • Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (29 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:41:31 -0500
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (35 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:52:16 -0800
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (28 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:43:43 -0500
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (58 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 07:24:07 -0700
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (41 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:12:17 -0600
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (36 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:30:14 -0600
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (23 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:10:30 -0500
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (24 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:47:30 -0500
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (65 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:57:30 -0500
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (24 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:05:01 -0500
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (25 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:18:37 -0500
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (35 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:36:17 -0500
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (32 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:38:48 -0500
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (29 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:43:17 -0500
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (32 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:29:34 -0800
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (31 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:45:56 -0500
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (39 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:48:58 -0500
    • Re: Deejays--was: Brunswick Records rights/Universal (40 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:44:48 -0800

43. Defending an "infringer"
    • Defending an "infringer" (51 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:08:16 -0800

44. DRM (was CD Longevity)
    • Re: DRM (was CD Longevity) (41 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:30:51 -0800

45. Drug plan switch-over. Off topic?
    • Drug plan switch-over. Off topic? (30 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:00:01 -0500

46. Eye Glasses
    • Eye Glasses (25 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:24:56 -0500
    • Re: Eye Glasses (22 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:14:52 -0800
    • Re: Eye Glasses (34 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

47. File formats for analogue video
    • File formats for analogue video (50 lines)
      From: Jeppe Christensen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 09:02:31 +0100

48. Formats (was Risk assessment tool Q2)
    • Re: Formats (was Risk assessment tool Q2) (41 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:04:45 -0500
    • Re: Formats (was Risk assessment tool Q2) (54 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:55:32 -0500

49. Future data recovery from [Memorex CDs]
    • Future data recovery from [Memorex CDs] (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:48:22 EST
    • Re: Future data recovery from [Memorex CDs] (46 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:47:12 -0500
    • Re: Future data recovery from [Memorex CDs] (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:29:01 EST

50. Fw: CHARM Symposium 3: announcement
    • Fw: CHARM Symposium 3: announcement (59 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:10:49 -0500

51. Fw: [ARSCLIST] Sound card recommendations
    • Fw: [ARSCLIST] Sound card recommendations (44 lines)
      From: Martin Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:22:54 -0600

52. Fw: [ARSCLIST] Vinegar syndrome audio tapes
    • Fw: [ARSCLIST] Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (138 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:03:35 -0500
    • Re: Fw: [ARSCLIST] Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (174 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:56:17 -0500
    • Re: Fw: [ARSCLIST] Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (201 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:01:30 -0500
    • Re: Fw: [ARSCLIST] Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (38 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:20:30 -0500
    • Re: Fw: [ARSCLIST] Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (52 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:05:59 -0500
    • Re: Fw: [ARSCLIST] Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:32:47 -0800
    • Re: Fw: [ARSCLIST] Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (54 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:47:33 -0500
    • Re: Fw: [ARSCLIST] Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (176 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:19:19 -0800

53. Fwd: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
    • Fwd: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (61 lines)
      From: Aurora Perez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:05:22 -0800

54. How well to archive (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Sound card recommendations)
    • How well to archive (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Sound card recommendations) (44 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:09:30 -0800

55. Huge classical collection (LPs and CDs) looking for a home
    • Huge classical collection (LPs and CDs) looking for a home (66 lines)
      From: Joel Bresler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:21:33 -0500
    • Re: Huge classical collection (LPs and CDs) looking for a home (25 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:28:54 EST
    • Re: Huge classical collection (LPs and CDs) looking for a home (41 lines)
      From: Joel Bresler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:03:30 -0500

56. Inkjet & thermal CD printing
    • Inkjet & thermal CD printing (29 lines)
      From: Maze, Elinor A. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:36:57 -0600
    • Re: Inkjet & thermal CD printing (57 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:10:58 -0500
    • Re: Inkjet & thermal CD printing (39 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:31:34 EST
    • Re: Inkjet & thermal CD printing (46 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:56:02 -0700
    • Re: Inkjet & thermal CD printing (33 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:43:03 -0800

57. Job Listing -- Audio Digitization Archivist (NYC)
    • Job Listing -- Audio Digitization Archivist (NYC) (76 lines)
      From: Carlin M. Wragg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:23:23 -0500

58. Job Posting - 92nd Street Y, New York City
    • Job Posting - 92nd Street Y, New York City (56 lines)
      From: Steve Siegel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:15:59 -0500
    • Re: Job Posting - 92nd Street Y, New York City (63 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:53:58 -0500

59. LA job opportunity
    • LA job opportunity (43 lines)
      From: Claus Trelby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:11:48 -0500

60. Lacquers, etc.
    • Lacquers, etc. (19 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:54:05 -0500

61. Leads on leader Gordon Henderson
    • Leads on leader Gordon Henderson (23 lines)
      From: Martin Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:24:09 -0600

62. Linda Tripp Tapes GONE
    • Linda Tripp Tapes GONE (36 lines)
      From: Christina Hostetter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:53:54 -0500

63. Long reply on critics' listening (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Plus Deck)
    • Long reply on critics' listening (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Plus Deck) (55 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 08:28:14 -0800

64. Long-shot video manual quest
    • Long-shot video manual quest (20 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:40:40 -0500

65. Longevity of Flash Memory
    • Longevity of Flash Memory (23 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:19:42 -0600
    • Re: Longevity of Flash Memory (49 lines)
      From: Alyssa Ryvers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:25:50 -0500

66. MAM-A CD-R Failure issues?--from H-Oral History list
    • MAM-A CD-R Failure issues?--from H-Oral History list (94 lines)
      From: andy kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:02:11 -0500
    • Re: MAM-A CD-R Failure issues?--from H-Oral History list (55 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:11:07 -0800
    • Re: MAM-A CD-R Failure issues?--from H-Oral History list (42 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:33:18 +0100
    • Re: MAM-A CD-R Failure issues?--from H-Oral History list (63 lines)
      From: Bob Conrad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:46:25 -0500
    • Re: MAM-A CD-R Failure issues?--from H-Oral History list (38 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:06:42 +0100
    • Re: MAM-A CD-R Failure issues?--from H-Oral History list (192 lines)
      From: Bob Conrad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:40:16 -0500

67. May copies be made on [Memorex CDs and more!]
    • Re: May copies be made on [Memorex CDs and more!] (45 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:16:50 EST

68. Memorex CDs
    • Memorex CDs (37 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:57:05 -0600
    • Re: Memorex CDs (26 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:12:58 -0600
    • Re: Memorex CDs (50 lines)
      From: Jerry Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:22:46 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (64 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:04:53 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (62 lines)
      From: John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:03:17 -0600
    • Re: Memorex CDs (48 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:05:32 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (95 lines)
      From: Claus Trelby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:26:01 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (94 lines)
      From: Claus Trelby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:38:06 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (114 lines)
      From: Jonathan Wise <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:47:38 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (118 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:55:51 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (87 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:09:12 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (25 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:11:19 -0600
    • Re: Memorex CDs (142 lines)
      From: Claus Trelby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:16:40 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (21 lines)
      From: John Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:31:16 -0800
    • Re: Memorex CDs (167 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:01:49 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (39 lines)
      From: Jerry Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:04:28 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (119 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:05:25 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (38 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:26:06 -0800
    • Re: Memorex CDs (66 lines)
      From: John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:47:44 -0600
    • Re: Memorex CDs (73 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:54:13 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (28 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:13:45 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (39 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:51:37 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (30 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:13:43 -0800
    • Re: Memorex CDs (27 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:20:20 -0800
    • Re: Memorex CDs (58 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:07:55 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (95 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:29:14 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (37 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:33:44 +0000
    • Re: Memorex CDs (108 lines)
      From: Claus Trelby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:10:11 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (46 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:55:39 -0600
    • Re: Memorex CDs (105 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:11:16 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (38 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:53:35 -0800
    • Re: Memorex CDs (32 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:42:02 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (39 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:53:29 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (40 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:07:34 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (57 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:25:25 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (49 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:52:36 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (31 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:07:03 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (64 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:24:21 +0000
    • Re: Memorex CDs (66 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 07:19:43 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (34 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:18:36 +0000
    • Re: Memorex CDs (71 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:16:06 -0600
    • Re: Memorex CDs (40 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:05:18 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (57 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 07:47:54 -0800
    • Re: Memorex CDs (56 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 07:03:18 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (37 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:04:10 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (38 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:25:00 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (65 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:22:44 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (42 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 19:21:53 -0800
    • Re: Memorex CDs (62 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:52:04 +0000
    • Re: Memorex CDs (24 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:02:03 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (26 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:44:54 +0000
    • Re: Memorex CDs (40 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:50:46 +0000
    • Re: Memorex CDs (45 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:11:05 +0000
    • Re: Memorex CDs (39 lines)
      From: Michael Fitzgerald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:23:08 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (61 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:03:03 -0800
    • Re: Memorex CDs (25 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:46:33 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (31 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:22:31 +0000
    • Re: Memorex CDs (23 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:17:26 EST
    • Re: Memorex CDs (30 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:34:54 -0600
    • Re: Memorex CDs (38 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:14:33 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs (25 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:59:20 +0000

69. Memorex CDs - long reply on CD methodology
    • Re: Memorex CDs - long reply on CD methodology (62 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 19:32:08 -0800
    • Re: Memorex CDs - long reply on CD methodology (40 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:24:47 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs - long reply on CD methodology (47 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:18:08 -0800
    • Re: Memorex CDs - long reply on CD methodology (43 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:25:08 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs - long reply on CD methodology (26 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:41:45 +0000
    • Re: Memorex CDs - long reply on CD methodology (32 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:44:20 +0000

70. Memorex CDs and more!
    • Memorex CDs and more! (84 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:34:14 -0600
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (39 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:58:13 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:15:15 EST
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (59 lines)
      From: Jerry Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:51:05 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (39 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:49:33 -0800
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (31 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:37:27 -0800
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (46 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:11:36 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (39 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:21:49 -0800
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (42 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:44:12 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (50 lines)
      From: Jon Noring <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:23:11 -0700
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (76 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:51:19 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (59 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:16:04 -0600
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (86 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:54:22 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (37 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:55:12 -0600
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (58 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:43:48 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (76 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:50:32 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (101 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:04:06 -0600
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (92 lines)
      From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:21:16 -0700
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (167 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:48:52 -0800
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (38 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:13:37 +0000
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (38 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:02:11 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (26 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:48:42 -0500
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (21 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:02:22 -0600
    • Re: Memorex CDs and more! (31 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:32:21 -0800

71. More on Clark
    • More on Clark (16 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:56:12 -0500

72. Motown mowed down
    • Motown mowed down (19 lines)
      From: Jeanette Berard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:46:10 -0800

73. My Splice repair nightmare (was: Cassette surgery -- paging Dr. Hess)
    • My Splice repair nightmare (was: Cassette surgery -- paging Dr. Hess) (32 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:12:13 -0500

74. Mylar clarification (duh!)
    • Re: Mylar clarification (duh!) (46 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 16:44:35 -0600

75. NAEB series query
    • NAEB series query (40 lines)
      From: Andy Lanset <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:38:07 -0500

76. New challenges for audio preservation
    • New challenges for audio preservation (97 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:05:41 -0600
    • Re: New challenges for audio preservation (97 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:49:16 -0500
    • Re: New challenges for audio preservation (32 lines)
      From: Trey Bunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:53:50 -0800
    • Re: New challenges for audio preservation (32 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:20:22 -0500
    • Re: New challenges for audio preservation (58 lines)
      From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:35:50 -0600
    • Re: New challenges for audio preservation (71 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:13:27 -0800
    • Re: New challenges for audio preservation (65 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:39:58 -0500
    • Re: New challenges for audio preservation (80 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:06:30 -0500
    • Re: New challenges for audio preservation (84 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 19:02:48 -0500
    • Re: New challenges for audio preservation (108 lines)
      From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 19:06:37 -0600
    • Re: New challenges for audio preservation (16 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:36:07 EST
    • Re: New challenges for audio preservation (25 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:41:06 -0500
    • Re: New challenges for audio preservation (32 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:21:31 -0500
    • Re: New challenges for audio preservation (36 lines)
      From: Bronwyn Officer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:32:35 +1300
    • Re: New challenges for audio preservation (21 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:10:26 -0500
    • Re: New challenges for audio preservation (27 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:33:58 -0500

77. Odd turntable
    • Odd turntable (41 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:12:15 -0500
    • Re: Odd turntable (50 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:32:43 -0500

78. On site CD duplication
    • On site CD duplication (54 lines)
      From: Susan Balsam <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:38:11 -0600
    • Re: On site CD duplication (82 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:22:12 -0800
    • Re: On site CD duplication (103 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:03:42 -0800
    • Re: On site CD duplication (27 lines)
      From: Jos Van Dyck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:18:12 +0100

79. OT: EAS/EBS in the US was Deejays
    • Re: OT: EAS/EBS in the US was Deejays (40 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:34:00 -0500

80. Phil Elwood Long Time ARSC Member and Support died today
    • Re: Phil Elwood Long Time ARSC Member and Support died today (21 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:39:43 EST

81. Phil Elwood Long Time ARSC Mewmber and Support died today
    • Phil Elwood Long Time ARSC Mewmber and Support died today (42 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:23:34 EST

82. Pianorolls, was: Memorex CDs and more!
    • Pianorolls, was: Memorex CDs and more! (58 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:12:46 -0800
    • Re: Pianorolls, was: Memorex CDs and more! (30 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 19:44:02 +0000
    • Re: Pianorolls, was: Memorex CDs and more! (44 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:37:01 -0500

83. Pirated Mengelberg 78s
    • Re: Pirated Mengelberg 78s (36 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 06:32:32 -0800
    • Re: Pirated Mengelberg 78s (57 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 09:59:10 -0500
    • Re: Pirated Mengelberg 78s (79 lines)
      From: david diehl <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 09:41:59 -0600
    • Re: Pirated Mengelberg 78s (19 lines)
      From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 09:05:32 -0800
    • Re: Pirated Mengelberg 78s (35 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 20:46:19 -0500

84. Please watch attributions, again!
    • Please watch attributions, again! (46 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:56:27 -0500
    • Re: Please watch attributions, again! (26 lines)
      From: Matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:25:49 -0500

85. Please watch attributions, again!... and cataloging
    • Re: Please watch attributions, again!... and cataloging (37 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:46:01 -0600

86. Plus Deck
    • Re: Plus Deck (30 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 08:52:45 -0600
    • Re: Plus Deck (47 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 20:55:55 -0500
    • Re: Plus Deck (45 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 08:32:52 -0600
    • Re: Plus Deck (65 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 22:27:16 -0500

87. proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
    • proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (22 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:47:45 -0800
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (76 lines)
      From: Prentice, Will <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:49:17 -0000
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (92 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:59:48 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (71 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:17:00 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (105 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:31:04 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (103 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:49:59 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (38 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:39:52 -0800
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (146 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:17:10 -0800
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (43 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:17:02 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (52 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:55:08 -0600
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (30 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:00:14 -0800
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (21 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:22:07 -0600
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (87 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:54:17 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (42 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:19:26 -0800
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (32 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:34:55 -0800
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (21 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:12:52 -0600
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (66 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:21:37 -0600
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (53 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:04:36 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (42 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:06:43 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (72 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:20:01 +0100
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (93 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:06:37 -0600
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (44 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:28:37 EST
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (49 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:40:05 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (59 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:45:19 -0600
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (98 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:15:01 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (23 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:38:43 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (44 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:09:50 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (46 lines)
      From: Bewley, Nigel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:23:51 -0000
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (41 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:16:27 -0800
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (61 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:20:46 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (58 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:34:00 -0800
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (41 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:39:17 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (35 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:38:11 -0800
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (30 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:06:50 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (53 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:20:36 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (38 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:28:34 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (20 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:48:08 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (32 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:08:35 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (20 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:51:58 -0500
    • Re: proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer? (72 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:55:05 -0500

88. Quote Citings--was: the public Domain
    • Quote Citings--was: the public Domain (33 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:10:59 -0500
    • Re: Quote Citings--was: the public Domain (48 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 06:13:06 -0500

89. Raucheisen collection
    • Raucheisen collection (43 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 08:41:45 -0500
    • Re: Raucheisen collection (110 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:47:45 -0500
    • Re: Raucheisen collection (42 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:49:53 +0100
    • Re: Raucheisen collection (44 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:52:42 -0800
    • Re: Raucheisen collection (48 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:31:07 -0500
    • Re: Raucheisen collection (23 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:09:56 -0500

90. Records wanted
    • Records wanted (18 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:52:48 -0500
    • Re: Records wanted (21 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:12:08 -0500

91. reel to reel tape deck
    • reel to reel tape deck (20 lines)
      From: Thomas Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:20:02 -0500
    • Re: reel to reel tape deck (36 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:33:05 -0600
    • Re: reel to reel tape deck (45 lines)
      From: eugene audio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:17:20 -0800

92. Reissues II--was: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more
    • Reissues II--was: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (33 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:11:03 -0500
    • Re: Reissues II--was: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (68 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:42:51 -0500
    • Re: Reissues II--was: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (27 lines)
      From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:42:55 -0500
    • Re: Reissues II--was: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (36 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:44:14 +0000
    • Re: Reissues II--was: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (48 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:22:28 -0600

93. Reissues--was: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more
    • Reissues--was: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (105 lines)
      From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:05:27 -0500

94. Reminder deadline TAPE workshop management of audiovisual collections
    • Reminder deadline TAPE workshop management of audiovisual collections (66 lines)
      From: Ecpa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:25:05 +0100

95. Reminder Notice: 2006 ARSC Awards Nominations
    • Reminder Notice: 2006 ARSC Awards Nominations (88 lines)
      From: Bill Klinger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:04:27 -0500

96. Replica 78s ([OffList] creating access cd's)
    • Replica 78s ([OffList] creating access cd's) (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:53:46 EST

97. Reproducing Pianos
    • Re: Reproducing Pianos (105 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:22:32 -0500

98. Risk assessment tool
    • Risk assessment tool (46 lines)
      From: Casey, Michael T <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:20:00 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (88 lines)
      From: Bewley, Nigel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 14:38:14 -0000
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (63 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 08:46:02 -0600
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (53 lines)
      From: Bewley, Nigel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:34:23 -0000
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (32 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 11:02:20 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (47 lines)
      From: Lars Gaustad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:47:22 +0100
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (60 lines)
      From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 13:09:00 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (55 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 13:23:19 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (97 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 19:03:55 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 20:38:40 EST
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (39 lines)
      From: Casey, Michael T <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 08:58:00 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (28 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 09:41:08 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (52 lines)
      From: Casey, Michael T <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:07:31 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 12:36:47 EST
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (75 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 12:36:00 -0600
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (61 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:47:55 -0800
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (58 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 12:33:34 -0600
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (28 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:44:38 -0800
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (41 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:49:30 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (64 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:52:58 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool (81 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:26:48 -0500

99. Risk assessment tool Q2
    • Risk assessment tool Q2 (50 lines)
      From: Casey, Michael T <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:14:12 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (83 lines)
      From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 15:04:02 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (98 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 15:31:56 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (130 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 15:45:58 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (27 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:34:58 EST
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (101 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 18:01:16 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (68 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 18:26:42 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (76 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:31:52 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (45 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:36:20 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (24 lines)
      From: Steven <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 22:22:12 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (35 lines)
      From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 16:51:44 +0000
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (70 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 08:04:20 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (39 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:13:08 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (69 lines)
      From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:43:41 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (103 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:10:08 -0600
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (42 lines)
      From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 08:55:40 -0800
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (20 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:05:35 -0500
    • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 (114 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:09:49 -0500

100. Risk assessment tool Q2 - tape lubrication
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 - tape lubrication (30 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 22:50:30 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 - tape lubrication (35 lines)
       From: Angie Dickinson Mickle <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 08:17:28 -0700
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 - tape lubrication (49 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 13:13:42 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 - tape lubrication (28 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 14:34:39 EST
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q2 - tape lubrication (188 lines)
       From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:25:03 -0600

101. Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT
     • Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (57 lines)
       From: Casey, Michael T <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:41:45 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (92 lines)
       From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:39:55 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (92 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:22:49 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (103 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:02:16 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (102 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:16:41 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (38 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:13:06 -0800
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (53 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:47:19 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (36 lines)
       From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:13:39 EST
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (38 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:44:45 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (50 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:21:44 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (31 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:17:48 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (68 lines)
       From: Marie Azile O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:36:15 -0600
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (40 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:14:54 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (107 lines)
       From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:32:46 -0600
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (41 lines)
       From: Konrad Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:14:05 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (49 lines)
       From: Konrad Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:41:04 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (70 lines)
       From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:19:09 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (87 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:24:44 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (22 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:27:24 -0600
     • Re: Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT (43 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:53:02 -0600

102. Risk assessment tool--off brands
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (90 lines)
       From: Casey, Michael T <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 08:47:50 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (109 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 09:23:07 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (35 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 09:47:07 -0600
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (119 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:43:36 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (138 lines)
       From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:16:22 -0600
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (170 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:48:05 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (37 lines)
       From: Casey, Michael T <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:52:05 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (44 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 16:23:53 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (64 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:45:19 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (27 lines)
       From: JOHN HALL <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:34:07 -0600
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (79 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 19:25:18 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (88 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 19:46:47 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (33 lines)
       From: Steven <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 22:09:56 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (23 lines)
       From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 14:33:49 EST
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (24 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 13:41:25 -0800
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (52 lines)
       From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 17:44:42 -0600
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (49 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 19:23:54 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (58 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 19:34:02 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (65 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 19:36:03 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (37 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 19:07:14 -0600
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (111 lines)
       From: Michael Biel [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:05:12 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (112 lines)
       From: Michael Biel [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:09:38 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (21 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:36:48 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (48 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:45:24 -0500
     • Re: Risk assessment tool--off brands (20 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:04:26 -0600

103. Scopes Trial Sound Recordings
     • Scopes Trial Sound Recordings (24 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:45:14 EST
     • Re: Scopes Trial Sound Recordings (48 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:21:43 -0500
     • Re: Scopes Trial Sound Recordings (52 lines)
       From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:42:54 -0500
     • Re: Scopes Trial Sound Recordings (44 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:52:24 -0500

104. Seattle Convention Interest
     • Re: Seattle Convention Interest (100 lines)
       From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:37:39 -0600

105. Seeking Larry Clinton 78s
     • Seeking Larry Clinton 78s (42 lines)
       From: Bob Conrad <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:53:09 -0500

106. Shadowgraphed Needles
     • Shadowgraphed Needles (17 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 23:45:07 -0500
     • Re: Shadowgraphed Needles (45 lines)
       From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:20:29 +0100
     • Re: Shadowgraphed Needles (40 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:18:07 -0600
     • Re: Shadowgraphed Needles (48 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:51:22 -0500
     • Re: Shadowgraphed Needles (32 lines)
       From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:13:57 -0500
     • Re: Shadowgraphed Needles (45 lines)
       From: Richard Warren <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:32:26 -0500
     • Re: Shadowgraphed Needles (31 lines)
       From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:48:00 -0500
     • Re: Shadowgraphed Needles (34 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:45:09 -0500
     • Re: Shadowgraphed Needles (69 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:59:55 -0600
     • Re: Shadowgraphed Needles (25 lines)
       From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:28:44 -0500

107. Sound card recommendations
     • Sound card recommendations (30 lines)
       From: Jeppe Christensen <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:21:59 +0100
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (68 lines)
       From: Jonathan Wise <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:58:46 -0500
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (54 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:48:09 -0500
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (56 lines)
       From: Casey, Michael T <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:15:16 -0500
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (35 lines)
       From: Lani Spahr <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:19:13 -0800
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (64 lines)
       From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:44:46 -0600
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (58 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:05:09 -0500
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (17 lines)
       From: Jos Van Dyck <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:32:53 +0100
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (77 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:07:29 -0500
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (42 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:13:30 -0500
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (104 lines)
       From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:43:15 +0100
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (129 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:59:57 -0500
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (38 lines)
       From: Konrad Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:08:27 -0500
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (38 lines)
       From: Konrad Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:25:10 -0500
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (28 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:05:35 -0500
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (52 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:44:35 -0500
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (30 lines)
       From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:02:38 -0500
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (58 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:51:58 -0800
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (33 lines)
       From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:29:36 -0600
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (81 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:11:07 -0500
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (38 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:08:36 -0800
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (48 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:36:24 -0500
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (75 lines)
       From: Jon Noring <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:41:12 -0700
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (46 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:10:27 -0500
     • Re: Sound card recommendations (44 lines)
       From: Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:27:54 -0500

108. speaking of cataloging terminology...
     • speaking of cataloging terminology... (32 lines)
       From: Melanie Brown <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:08:17 -0500
     • Re: speaking of cataloging terminology... (75 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 08:07:30 -0600
     • Re: speaking of cataloging terminology... (31 lines)
       From: Martin Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 08:40:49 -0600
     • Re: speaking of cataloging terminology... (25 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:50:59 -0500
     • Re: speaking of cataloging terminology... (34 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:15 -0500
     • Re: speaking of cataloging terminology... (27 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:13:55 -0600

109. Stereo of recording of oral histories ?
     • Stereo of recording of oral histories ? (34 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 13:24:53 -0500
     • Re: Stereo of recording of oral histories ? (59 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 13:45:54 -0600
     • Re: Stereo of recording of oral histories ? (56 lines)
       From: andy Kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:18:23 -0500
     • Re: Stereo of recording of oral histories ? (40 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:24:01 -0500
     • Re: Stereo of recording of oral histories ? (56 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:32:33 -0500
     • Re: Stereo of recording of oral histories ? (78 lines)
       From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:34:56 -0600
     • Re: Stereo of recording of oral histories ? (48 lines)
       From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 17:59:21 -0600
     • Re: Stereo of recording of oral histories ? (66 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 19:32:15 -0500
     • Re: Stereo of recording of oral histories ? (25 lines)
       From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 19:46:43 -0600
     • Re: Stereo of recording of oral histories ? (40 lines)
       From: Steven <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 22:12:17 -0500
     • Re: Stereo of recording of oral histories ? (65 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:07:31 -0500
     • Re: Stereo of recording of oral histories ? (73 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:16:45 -0500

110. sticky labels for DAT tapes
     • sticky labels for DAT tapes (21 lines)
       From: dave n <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:13:50 -0500
     • Re: sticky labels for DAT tapes (34 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:17:05 -0500

111. Storage of Acetate Magnetic Media
     • Re: Storage of Acetate Magnetic Media (35 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:19:51 -0500

112. Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes
     • Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (24 lines)
       From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:42:16 -0500
     • Re: Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (36 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:29:22 -0800
     • Re: Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (39 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:44:30 -0500
     • Re: Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (46 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:19:14 -0800
     • Re: Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (22 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:50:29 -0500
     • Re: Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (40 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 18:33:49 +0000

113. Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (now MP3)
     • Re: Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (now MP3) (34 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:09:41 -0600
     • Re: Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (now MP3) (25 lines)
       From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:14:22 -0500
     • Re: Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (now MP3) (22 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:57:33 -0600

114. Supplier for 5" audio reel boxes
     • Supplier for 5" audio reel boxes (29 lines)
       From: Kate Murray <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:10:16 -0500
     • Re: Supplier for 5" audio reel boxes (62 lines)
       From: George Strawley <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:07:48 -0500
     • Re: Supplier for 5" audio reel boxes (81 lines)
       From: Luann Schneider <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:28:28 -0600

115. Supplier for audio reel boxes
     • Re: Supplier for audio reel boxes (72 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:01:12 -0500

116. Telefunken & DGG
     • Re: Telefunken & DGG (141 lines)
       From: Copeland, Peter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:29:12 -0000

117. Text puzzle
     • Text puzzle (23 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:26:41 -0500
     • Re: Text puzzle (35 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:36:55 -0500
     • Re: Text puzzle (41 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:07:40 -0800

118. the public Domain
     • Re: the public Domain (29 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:54:49 -0500
     • Re: the public Domain (94 lines)
       From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:01:36 -0800
     • Re: the public Domain (32 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:18:56 EST
     • Re: the public Domain (62 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:24:15 -0500
     • Re: the public Domain (42 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:34:00 -0500
     • Re: the public Domain (61 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:53:23 +0000
     • Re: the public Domain (42 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:56:52 +0000
     • Re: the public Domain (94 lines)
       From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:12:02 -0600
     • Re: the public Domain (28 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:53:43 -0500
     • Re: the public Domain (112 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:29:07 -0500

119. USB music card vs. onboard digitization
     • USB music card vs. onboard digitization (38 lines)
       From: Joel Bresler <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:42:38 -0500
     • Re: USB music card vs. onboard digitization (61 lines)
       From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:01:04 -1000
     • Re: USB music card vs. onboard digitization (41 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:57:52 -0800
     • Re: USB music card vs. onboard digitization (91 lines)
       From: Alyssa Ryvers <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:59:03 -0500
     • Re: USB music card vs. onboard digitization (48 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:11:27 -0800
     • Re: USB music card vs. onboard digitization (49 lines)
       From: Alyssa Ryvers <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 01:37:13 -0500
     • Re: USB music card vs. onboard digitization (97 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:53:17 -0500
     • Re: USB music card vs. onboard digitization (117 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:20:17 -0500

120. Vinegar syndrome audio tapes
     • Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (64 lines)
       From: Casey, Michael T <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:13:12 -0500
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (89 lines)
       From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:11:00 -0500
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (71 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:50:25 -0500
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (100 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:55:07 -0500
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes (117 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:55:13 -0600

121. Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more
     • Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (47 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:37:30 EST
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (75 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 07:04:56 -0500
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (65 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:16:05 -0500
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (36 lines)
       From: Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:08:57 -0500
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (39 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:16:15 -0500
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (50 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:48:49 +0000
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (68 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:21:24 -0500
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (89 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:32:55 -0500
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (37 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:02:18 +0000
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (35 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:21:35 -0800
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (33 lines)
       From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:08:08 -0800
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (40 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:23:06 -0500
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (58 lines)
       From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:47:28 +0000
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (46 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:04:04 -0500
     • Re: Vinegar syndrome audio tapes [ARSCLIST] Memorex CDs and more (24 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:43:48 -0800

122. Washington DC ARSC/AES Program
     • Washington DC ARSC/AES Program (46 lines)
       From: Bryan E Cornell <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:24:17 -0500

123. Webcasting (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Brunswick Records rights/Universal)
     • Webcasting (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Brunswick Records rights/Universal) (34 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:06:18 -0800

124. What Kind of Speed?
     • Re: What Kind of Speed? (47 lines)
       From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:10:21 -0800
     • Re: What Kind of Speed? (60 lines)
       From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:36:38 -0800

125. Wire Tap Tapes of Linda Tripp
     • Wire Tap Tapes of Linda Tripp (47 lines)
       From: Christina Hostetter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:42:29 -0500
     • Re: Wire Tap Tapes of Linda Tripp (52 lines)
       From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:46:40 -0500

126. [AMIA-L] Storage of Acetate Magnetic Media
     • Re: [AMIA-L] Storage of Acetate Magnetic Media (61 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:14:53 -0500
     • Re: [AMIA-L] Storage of Acetate Magnetic Media (36 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:59:25 -0500
     • Re: [AMIA-L] Storage of Acetate Magnetic Media (55 lines)
       From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:05:23 -0800
     • Re: [AMIA-L] Storage of Acetate Magnetic Media (42 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:09:49 EST
     • Re: [AMIA-L] Storage of Acetate Magnetic Media (37 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:27:36 -0500
     • Re: [AMIA-L] Storage of Acetate Magnetic Media (31 lines)
       From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:36:44 -0500
     • Re: [AMIA-L] Storage of Acetate Magnetic Media (36 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:41:20 EST

127. [OffList] creating access cd's
     • Re: [OffList] creating access cd's (46 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:04:59 -0500
     • Re: [OffList] creating access cd's (77 lines)
       From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:29:57 -0500
     • Re: [OffList] creating access cd's (39 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 22:10:36 -0500
     • Re: [OffList] creating access cd's (50 lines)
       From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 22:22:04 -0500
     • Re: [OffList] creating access cd's (23 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:23:05 -0500
     • Re: [OffList] creating access cd's (26 lines)
       From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:29:00 -0800
     • Re: [OffList] creating access cd's (36 lines)
       From: steven c <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 23:34:50 -0500

128. {ARSCLIST] Pirated Mengelberg 78s
     • Re: {ARSCLIST] Pirated Mengelberg 78s (29 lines)
       From: Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 00:20:37 -0800
     • Re: {ARSCLIST] Pirated Mengelberg 78s (39 lines)
       From: [log in to unmask]
       Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 21:08:15 -0500