ARSCLIST Archives – June 2005

1. "The Record Effect"
   • "The Record Effect" (26 lines)
     From: Jonathan Wise <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:45:51 -0400
   • Re: "The Record Effect" (35 lines)
     From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:09:43 -0500
   • Re: "The Record Effect" (42 lines)
     From: Joseph Conway <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:24:35 -0600
   • Re: "The Record Effect" (51 lines)
     From: Jonathan Wise <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:36:23 -0400
   • Re: "The Record Effect" (35 lines)
     From: Tom Caw <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:51:47 -0500
   • Re: "The Record Effect" (42 lines)
     From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:41:04 -0400
   • Re: "The Record Effect" (53 lines)
     From: Eugene Lew <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:12:05 -0400

2. 2GB limit for audio file formats
   • 2GB limit for audio file formats (51 lines)
     From: Alec McLane <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:32:59 -0400
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (47 lines)
     From: andy kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:55:06 -0400
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (95 lines)
     From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:03:55 -0700
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (92 lines)
     From: Mew, Peter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:04:17 +0100
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (57 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:33:01 -0400
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (124 lines)
     From: Alec McLane <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:56:03 -0400
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (163 lines)
     From: Mew, Peter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:14:26 +0100
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (166 lines)
     From: Mew, Peter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:48:11 +0100
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (43 lines)
     From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:11:26 -0700
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (63 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:24:33 -0400
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (37 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:55:06 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (59 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:07:17 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (25 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:53:50 +0000
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (33 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:56:24 +0000
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (39 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 12:50:47 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (41 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 12:50:54 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (43 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:18:59 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (47 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 08:59:23 -0400
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (37 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:03:03 +0000
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (37 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:05:58 +0000
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (37 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:33:49 +0000
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (77 lines)
     From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:12:38 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (86 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:57:52 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (54 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:09:20 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (51 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:06:31 -0400
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (51 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:02:08 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (106 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:35:53 -0400
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (104 lines)
     From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:42:26 -0700
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (78 lines)
     From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:42:25 -0700
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (67 lines)
     From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:42:20 -0700
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (39 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:07:04 +0000
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (33 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:33:16 +0000
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (41 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 17:33:04 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (42 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 17:33:12 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (48 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 17:33:19 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (48 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 17:33:15 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (69 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 17:33:42 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (61 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 17:33:48 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (39 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 17:35:42 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (50 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 17:52:53 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (45 lines)
     From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 13:12:50 -0400
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (88 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:16:25 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (79 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:16:32 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (51 lines)
     From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 11:35:36 -0700
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (60 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:55:49 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (64 lines)
     From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 11:58:25 -0700
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (50 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:07:06 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (50 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:20:02 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (53 lines)
     From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 13:20:27 -0700
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (74 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:01:39 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (38 lines)
     From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:01:33 +0200
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (43 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:12:50 +0000
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (53 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:40:58 +0000
   • Re: 2GB limit for audio file formats (34 lines)
     From: Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:41:30 +0000

3. annotated webliography for audio archiving resources
   • annotated webliography for audio archiving resources (24 lines)
     From: Valerie Forrestal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:55:08 -0400

4. archival storage questions
   • archival storage questions (39 lines)
     From: Chad Hunter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:58:58 -0400

5. ARSC newsletter deadline
   • ARSC newsletter deadline (25 lines)
     From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:04:00 -0700

6. Atlanta Workshop - ARCHIVAL MANAGEMENT OF MOTION PICTURES AND RECORDED SOUND (w/Alan Lewis )
   • Re: Atlanta Workshop - ARCHIVAL MANAGEMENT OF MOTION PICTURES AND RECORDED SOUND (w/Alan Lewis ) (76 lines)
     From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:46:23 -0400
   • Re: Atlanta Workshop - ARCHIVAL MANAGEMENT OF MOTION PICTURES AND RECORDED SOUND (w/Alan Lewis ) (91 lines)
     From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:49:50 -0400

7. Audio Reformatting In Georgia
   • Re: Audio Reformatting In Georgia (28 lines)
     From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:17:34 -0400

8. AV to DV - PC or Mac?
   • AV to DV - PC or Mac? (28 lines)
     From: Klara Foeller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:55:53 -0500
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (38 lines)
     From: Damien Moody <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:07:40 -0400
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (45 lines)
     From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:48:27 -0700
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (62 lines)
     From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:51:03 -0400
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (91 lines)
     From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:05:26 -0700
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (73 lines)
     From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:19:58 -0500
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (62 lines)
     From: Angie Dickinson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:44:19 -0600
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (41 lines)
     From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:29:22 -0700
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (109 lines)
     From: Joseph Conway <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:26:08 -0600
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (84 lines)
     From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:47:04 -0500
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (118 lines)
     From: Jonathan Wise <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:01:22 -0400
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (28 lines)
     From: Angie Dickinson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:21:53 -0600
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (44 lines)
     From: Adrian Cosentini <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:57:19 -0400
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (65 lines)
     From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:00:24 -0700
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (47 lines)
     From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 12:01:20 -0700
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (53 lines)
     From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 12:50:49 -0700
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (128 lines)
     From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:25:23 -0500
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (104 lines)
     From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 14:04:35 -0700
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (171 lines)
     From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 17:15:23 -0400
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (42 lines)
     From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:27:14 -0700
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (16 lines)
     From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:16:40 -0400
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (23 lines)
     From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:18:12 -0400
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (34 lines)
     From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:20:53 -0400
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (24 lines)
     From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:22:46 -0400
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (38 lines)
     From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:25:36 -0400
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (20 lines)
     From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:28:57 -0400
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (60 lines)
     From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:46:29 -0700
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (16 lines)
     From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:48:07 -0400
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (73 lines)
     From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 20:50:28 -0500
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (201 lines)
     From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 21:00:43 -0500
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac? (32 lines)
     From: Angie Dickinson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:16:14 -0600

9. AV to DV - PC or Mac?--A list.
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac?--A list. (71 lines)
     From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 04:16:32 -0700
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac?--A list. (78 lines)
     From: Dale Francis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:14:27 -0400
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac?--A list. (27 lines)
     From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:31:31 -0400
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac?--A list. (32 lines)
     From: Dale Francis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:38:56 -0400
   • Re: AV to DV - PC or Mac?--A list. (43 lines)
     From: Angie Dickinson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:15:23 -0600

10. baking tapes
    • Re: baking tapes (78 lines)
      From: James Lindner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 08:25:50 -0400
    • Re: baking tapes (43 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 10:21:30 -1000
    • Re: baking tapes (67 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:44:51 -0400
    • Re: baking tapes (34 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 09:40:26 -0700
    • Re: baking tapes (44 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:17:46 -0400
    • Re: baking tapes (71 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:24:30 -0700
    • Re: baking tapes (81 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:24:18 -0400
    • Re: baking tapes (33 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:32:58 EDT
    • Re: baking tapes (71 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:36:29 -0400
    • Re: baking tapes (21 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:03:54 -0400
    • Re: baking tapes (33 lines)
      From: Joav Shdema <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 23:08:01 +0200
    • Re: baking tapes (26 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:27:21 -0500
    • Re: baking tapes (21 lines)
      From: matt Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:37:35 -0400
    • Re: baking tapes (71 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:36:59 -0700
    • Re: baking tapes (39 lines)
      From: Dave Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:40:58 -0400

11. CD copiers
    • CD copiers (27 lines)
      From: Andy Lanset <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 12:55:12 -0400
    • Re: CD copiers (43 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:49:03 -0400
    • Re: CD copiers (34 lines)
      From: Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:58:32 -0400
    • Re: CD copiers (47 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:53:25 -0400

12. CONTINUING THE MESSAGE TO RESTORE FUNDING FOR NHPRC
    • Re: CONTINUING THE MESSAGE TO RESTORE FUNDING FOR NHPRC (115 lines)
      From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:05:45 -0400

13. Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity
    • Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (343 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 12:23:12 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (147 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 00:10:53 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (43 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 01:13:02 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (38 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 01:39:23 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (31 lines)
      From: Daniel Leech-Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:04:06 +0100
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (65 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 06:51:05 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (38 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:26:34 -0400
    • Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (21 lines)
      From: Tim Brooks <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:32:49 EDT
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (23 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:38:03 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (35 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:45:56 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (44 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:28:07 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (62 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:43:37 -0700
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (32 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:59:25 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (22 lines)
      From: Jeff Willens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:09:19 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (20 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:58:54 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (48 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:03:14 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (37 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:27:24 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (90 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:41:52 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (30 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:19:23 -0700
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (44 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:43:10 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (43 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:56:09 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (72 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:20:12 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (68 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:28:42 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (97 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:31:34 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (123 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:12:34 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (25 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:22:05 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:45:54 -0700
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (29 lines)
      From: Jon Noring <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:11:42 -0600
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (68 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:25:48 -0400
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (33 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:45:56 -0500
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (62 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:16:34 -0500
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (40 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:25:45 -0500
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (27 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:45:09 -0500
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (33 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:49:10 -0700
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (41 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:38:17 +0200
    • Re: Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity (36 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:22:22 -0500

14. Cow Cow 's return?
    • Cow Cow 's return? (242 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:20:14 -0400
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (22 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:35:12 -0400
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (48 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:09:20 -0400
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (53 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:26:55 -0400
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (77 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:31:12 -0400
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (60 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 14:34:53 -0700
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (262 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:36:27 -0500
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (49 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:02:51 -0700
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (30 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 18:26:08 EDT
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (62 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:37:47 -0400
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (22 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:39:19 -0400
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (30 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:38:29 -0400
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (94 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:56:12 +0200
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (35 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:47:56 -0500
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (24 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:59:02 -0500
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (36 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 08:24:36 -0500
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (67 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:23:43 +0200
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (29 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:59:16 -0500
    • Re: Cow Cow 's return? (72 lines)
      From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:06:36 -0400

15. declicking
    • Re: declicking (76 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:51:41 -0400

16. Digital recorder for transferring LP collection
    • Re: Digital recorder for transferring LP collection (46 lines)
      From: Not Me <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 07:33:02 -0400
    • Re: Digital recorder for transferring LP collection (43 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 07:29:42 -0700
    • Re: Digital recorder for transferring LP collection (40 lines)
      From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:48:36 -0700
    • Re: Digital recorder for transferring LP collection (104 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:46:08 -0400
    • Re: Digital recorder for transferring LP collection (12 lines)
      From: Not Me <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:04:10 -0400

17. Discerning where a tape has been stored
    • Discerning where a tape has been stored (66 lines)
      From: M Myers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 02:19:52 -0400
    • Re: Discerning where a tape has been stored (44 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 23:54:47 -0700
    • Re: Discerning where a tape has been stored (69 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 06:54:45 -0400
    • Re: Discerning where a tape has been stored (49 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:22:43 +0200
    • Re: Discerning where a tape has been stored (37 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 10:08:35 -0700
    • Re: Discerning where a tape has been stored (32 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 10:38:01 -0700
    • Re: Discerning where a tape has been stored (37 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:11:03 -0400
    • Re: Discerning where a tape has been stored (102 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:18:27 -0400

18. DVD/CD analyzer query
    • DVD/CD analyzer query (64 lines)
      From: Prentice, Will <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:49:43 +0100
    • DVD/CD analyzer query (23 lines)
      From: Anonymous SET ARSCLIST DIGEST <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:54:12 -0400

19. Ebay Auction of 45s
    • Ebay Auction of 45s (21 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:26:04 EDT

20. Edith Evans
    • Re: Edith Evans (13 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:57:22 -0400
    • Re: Edith Evans (18 lines)
      From: Michael Ridderbusch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:20:06 -0400
    • Re: Edith Evans (15 lines)
      From: Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:24:56 -0400
    • Re: Edith Evans (24 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:38:33 -0400

21. Engineer position
    • Engineer position (90 lines)
      From: Casey, Michael T <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:09:41 -0500

22. Feedback: Multimedia Stations
    • Feedback: Multimedia Stations (67 lines)
      From: andy kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:38:21 -0400
    • Re: Feedback: Multimedia Stations (27 lines)
      From: Jeff Carroll <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:59:26 -0400
    • Re: Feedback: Multimedia Stations (86 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 12:04:47 -0700
    • Re: Feedback: Multimedia Stations (40 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:21:52 -0400
    • Re: Feedback: Multimedia Stations (90 lines)
      From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:33:22 -0400

23. file size metadata
    • file size metadata (40 lines)
      From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 14:23:30 -0700
    • Re: file size metadata (61 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:03:59 -0500
    • Re: file size metadata (88 lines)
      From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 09:49:25 -0700
    • Re: file size metadata (94 lines)
      From: Copeland, Peter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:50:56 +0100

24. File Storage Servers
    • File Storage Servers (53 lines)
      From: andy kolovos <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:03:58 -0400
    • Re: File Storage Servers (28 lines)
      From: Russell W. Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:32:51 -0400
    • Re: File Storage Servers (73 lines)
      From: David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 12:24:04 -0700
    • Re: File Storage Servers (89 lines)
      From: Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:28:54 -0500

25. First LP
    • First LP (34 lines)
      From: Nicole Blain <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:18:22 -0400
    • Re: First LP (37 lines)
      From: John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:47:20 -0700
    • Re: First LP (42 lines)
      From: Nicole Blain <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:55:45 -0400
    • Re: First LP (28 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:31:05 -0400
    • Re: First LP (49 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:06:55 -0400
    • Re: First LP (19 lines)
      From: Jeffrey J Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:12:47 -0500
    • Re: First LP (27 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:26:13 -0400
    • Re: First LP (72 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:32:36 -0400
    • Re: First LP (48 lines)
      From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:33:34 -0400
    • Re: First LP (29 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:42:38 -0400
    • Re: First LP (30 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:51:14 -0400
    • Re: First LP (31 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:02:52 +0200
    • Re: First LP (23 lines)
      From: Jeffrey J Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:37:48 -0500
    • Re: First LP (43 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:40:14 EDT
    • Re: First LP (37 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:58:45 -0400
    • Re: First LP (30 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:11:26 -0400
    • Re: First LP (39 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:17:22 EDT
    • Re: First LP (41 lines)
      From: Damien Moody <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 07:51:16 -0400
    • Re: First LP (60 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:31:47 -0400
    • Re: First LP (67 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:44:14 -0400

26. First LP- Mirko Paneko
    • Re: First LP- Mirko Paneko (98 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:31:22 -0400

27. Frosted CDs
    • Frosted CDs (78 lines)
      From: Prentice, Will <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:28:43 +0100
    • Re: Frosted CDs (49 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 12:53:06 -0400
    • Re: Frosted CDs (91 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:33:46 -0400
    • Re: Frosted CDs (59 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:42:48 -0700
    • Re: Frosted CDs (21 lines)
      From: Russell W. Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:27:43 -0400

28. Fw: Band names
    • Fw: Band names (208 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 09:01:30 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Band names (20 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 08:57:32 -0500
    • Re: Fw: Band names (217 lines)
      From: Damien Moody <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:03:01 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Band names (221 lines)
      From: Adrian Cosentini <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 15:18:02 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Band names (24 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 15:35:43 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Band names (37 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:13:46 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Band names (64 lines)
      From: Bill Schurk <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 05:48:30 -0700
    • Re: Fw: Band names (33 lines)
      From: Brandon Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:13:05 -0700
    • Re: Fw: Band names (36 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:44:44 -0500

29. Fw: CHARM Newsletter 2005 (attn Project Gramophone)...
    • Fw: CHARM Newsletter 2005 (attn Project Gramophone)... (25 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:21:12 -0400

30. FW: International Record Collector's Club
    • FW: International Record Collector's Club (32 lines)
      From: Farrington, Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:21:40 -0400

31. Fw: Kasper Malone
    • Fw: Kasper Malone (185 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:16:28 -0400

32. Fw: Plan to extend copyright in UK
    • Fw: Plan to extend copyright in UK (75 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:37:42 -0400
    • Re: Fw: Plan to extend copyright in UK (101 lines)
      From: Farrington, Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:19:28 -0400

33. Fwd: famous Beecham quote
    • Fwd: famous Beecham quote (20 lines)
      From: David S Sager <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:06:43 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: famous Beecham quote (29 lines)
      From: Parker Dinkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:01:09 -0500

34. Fwd: RE: A "one off" 78rpm record
    • Fwd: RE: A "one off" 78rpm record (64 lines)
      From: Kurt Nauck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:20:31 -0500

35. Gold DVD-Rs
    • Re: Gold DVD-Rs (22 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:24:31 -1000

36. High sample rates for noise removal (was 2GB limit for audio file formats)
    • Re: High sample rates for noise removal (was 2GB limit for audio file formats) (45 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:01:55 -0700
    • Re: High sample rates for noise removal (was 2GB limit for audio file formats) (57 lines)
      From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:16:35 +0200

37. Hydrolysis and the baking of tapes
    • Hydrolysis and the baking of tapes (54 lines)
      From: Jacqueline von Arb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 00:55:33 +0200

38. invitation - Atlanta, Ga., June 12
    • invitation - Atlanta, Ga., June 12 (24 lines)
      From: Laura Botts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:08:44 -0400

39. j.a. miller
    • j.a. miller (28 lines)
      From: Sebastian Derry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:49:37 -0700

40. job announvement
    • job announvement (100 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:38:21 -0500

41. Job listing--Center for Popular Music, MTSU
    • Job listing--Center for Popular Music, MTSU (84 lines)
      From: Paul F. Wells <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:18:13 -0500

42. Job Posting - University Archivist University of Kentucky
    • Job Posting - University Archivist University of Kentucky (90 lines)
      From: Carter, Lisa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:40:20 -0400

43. Kodak answers about asbestos.
    • Kodak answers about asbestos. (57 lines)
      From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:43:24 -0700
    • Re: Kodak answers about asbestos. (56 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:53:55 -0400
    • Re: Kodak answers about asbestos. (68 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:37:14 -0400
    • Re: Kodak answers about asbestos. (28 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:01:40 -0400

44. Longevity of data tape?
    • Longevity of data tape? (25 lines)
      From: Jonathan Wise <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:55:43 -0400

45. Longevity of data tape?--
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (43 lines)
      From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:27:27 -0700
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (59 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:36:49 -0500
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (41 lines)
      From: John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:47:02 -0500
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (65 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:52:00 -0500
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (54 lines)
      From: Ken Hansen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:46:53 -0400
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (105 lines)
      From: John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:08:28 -0500
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (73 lines)
      From: John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:10:24 -0500
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (78 lines)
      From: Ken Hansen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:26:09 -0400
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (61 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:32:27 -0400
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (104 lines)
      From: John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:46:26 -0500
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (170 lines)
      From: Claus Trelby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:01:42 -0400
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (39 lines)
      From: Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:32:41 -0400
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (137 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:56:18 -0500
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (45 lines)
      From: Jos Van Dyck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:55:53 +0200
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (115 lines)
      From: Ken Hansen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:12:38 -0400
    • Longevity of data tape?-- (25 lines)
      From: Anonymous SET ARSCLIST DIGEST <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:53:10 -0400
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (132 lines)
      From: John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:42:08 -0500
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (36 lines)
      From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 06:46:40 -0700
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (204 lines)
      From: John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 09:06:08 -0500
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (42 lines)
      From: Jerry Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:14:40 -0400
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (75 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:53:21 -0400
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (62 lines)
      From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:55:01 -0400
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (43 lines)
      From: seva <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:28:42 -0400
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (44 lines)
      From: Damien Moody <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:57:07 -0400
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (24 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:43:59 -0500
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (39 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:05:59 -0400
    • Re: Longevity of data tape?-- (60 lines)
      From: Gary Sprung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:56:21 -0700

46. mac vs pc
    • mac vs pc (21 lines)
      From: Dale Francis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:39:42 -0400
    • Re: mac vs pc (30 lines)
      From: Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:34:45 -0700
    • Re: mac vs pc (20 lines)
      From: Gary Sprung <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:46:59 -0700

47. Mac vs PC - Thanks
    • Mac vs PC - Thanks (45 lines)
      From: Klara Foeller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:46:14 -0500

48. Magix Audio Cleaning Lab
    • Magix Audio Cleaning Lab (43 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 00:41:40 -0400
    • Magix Audio Cleaning Lab (30 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:24:02 -0400

49. Mario Castelnuovo Tedesco reference recordings
    • Mario Castelnuovo Tedesco reference recordings (103 lines)
      From: Elly Rubin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:16:06 -0400

50. Mario Lanza date needed
    • Re: Mario Lanza date needed (71 lines)
      From: Copeland, Peter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:57:41 +0100

51. MC vs MM results (was 2GB limit for audio file formats)
    • MC vs MM results (was 2GB limit for audio file formats) (95 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 11:05:17 -0700
    • Re: MC vs MM results (was 2GB limit for audio file formats) (32 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 14:10:47 -0400
    • Re: MC vs MM results (was 2GB limit for audio file formats) (52 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 11:24:06 -0700
    • Re: MC vs MM results (was 2GB limit for audio file formats) (52 lines)
      From: Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:32:28 +0200

52. Mildly OT: Cut your own acetate recordings
    • Mildly OT: Cut your own acetate recordings (54 lines)
      From: Joel Bresler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:18:50 -0400

53. MLA Publications Awards - Call for Nominations
    • MLA Publications Awards - Call for Nominations (40 lines)
      From: Ken Calkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:36:04 -0700

54. My new "studio"
    • My new "studio" (30 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:39:00 -0400
    • Re: My new "studio" (22 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 08:49:15 -0500
    • Re: My new "studio" (42 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:16:04 -0400
    • Re: My new "studio" (35 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:14:32 -0500
    • Re: My new "studio" (45 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 00:12:16 -0400

55. off topic--edith evans
    • off topic--edith evans (21 lines)
      From: Michael Ridderbusch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:51:35 -0400
    • Re: off topic--edith evans (31 lines)
      From: Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:39:46 EDT

56. Opera Discographies
    • Opera Discographies (11 lines)
      From: Brian Capon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 06:57:52 -0400

57. Quadriga/AudioCube
    • Quadriga/AudioCube (38 lines)
      From: dave nolan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:40:18 -0400

58. Quantegy Is Back In Business
    • Quantegy Is Back In Business (50 lines)
      From: Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:32:24 -0400

59. Ravel Septet
    • Ravel Septet (25 lines)
      From: David S Sager <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:32:28 -0400
    • Re: Ravel Septet (49 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:46:38 -0400
    • Re: Ravel Septet (34 lines)
      From: Bill Schurk <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:00:34 -0700
    • Re: Ravel Septet (39 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:23:41 -0400
    • Re: Ravel Septet (16 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:16:30 EDT

60. Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes.
    • Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes. (27 lines)
      From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 06:06:53 -0700
    • Re: Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes. (62 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:41:17 -0500
    • Re: Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes. (29 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:49:26 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes. (55 lines)
      From: Erik Dix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:02:14 -0500
    • Re: Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes. (55 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:03:32 -0700
    • Re: Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes. (99 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:27:52 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes. (29 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 11:07:55 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes. (53 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:25:24 -0500
    • Re: Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes. (63 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 11:51:34 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes. (115 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:07:11 -0700
    • Re: Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes. (41 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:37:24 -0500
    • Re: Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes. (17 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:59:46 EDT
    • Re: Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes. (21 lines)
      From: Don Tait <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:54:18 EDT
    • Re: Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes. (81 lines)
      From: Eugene Audio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:10:31 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes. (100 lines)
      From: David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:36:14 -0400
    • Re: Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes. (37 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:42:36 -0700

61. Somewhat off-topic: Corporate responsibility concerning produc...
    • Re: Somewhat off-topic: Corporate responsibility concerning produc... (53 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 20:10:06 EDT
    • Re: Somewhat off-topic: Corporate responsibility concerning produc... (119 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 20:45:12 -0400
    • Re: Somewhat off-topic: Corporate responsibility concerning produc... (69 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:31:25 -0700
    • Re: Somewhat off-topic: Corporate responsibility concerning produc... (146 lines)
      From: Luann Schneider <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:20:27 -0500
    • Re: Somewhat off-topic: Corporate responsibility concerning produc... (64 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:17:44 EDT
    • Re: Somewhat off-topic: Corporate responsibility concerning produc... (21 lines)
      From: Ron Fial <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:18:18 -0700

62. Somewhat off-topic: Corporate responsibility concerning product safety of old equipm
    • Re: Somewhat off-topic: Corporate responsibility concerning product safety of old equipm (121 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:23:57 -0400

63. Somewhat off-topic: Corporate responsibility concerning product safety of old equipment.
    • Somewhat off-topic: Corporate responsibility concerning product safety of old equipment. (35 lines)
      From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:24:59 -0700
    • Re: Somewhat off-topic: Corporate responsibility concerning product safety of old equipment. (25 lines)
      From: Jeffrey J Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:46:01 -0500
    • Re: Somewhat off-topic: Corporate responsibility concerning product safety of old equipment. (42 lines)
      From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:10:03 -0700
    • Re: Somewhat off-topic: Corporate responsibility concerning product safety of old equipment. (52 lines)
      From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 20:11:21 +0200
    • Re: Somewhat off-topic: Corporate responsibility concerning product safety of old equipment. (85 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:43:15 -0700
    • Re: Somewhat off-topic: Corporate responsibility concerning product safety of old equipment. (39 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:57:27 -0700

64. stuck tape
    • stuck tape (48 lines)
      From: Christina Hostetter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:40:08 -0400
    • Re: stuck tape (35 lines)
      From: Language Laboratories and Archives <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:14:41 -0500
    • Re: stuck tape (87 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:25:41 -0400
    • Re: stuck tape (77 lines)
      From: Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:26:21 -0500
    • Re: stuck tape (65 lines)
      From: Robert Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:33:13 -0400

65. Stuck tape -- Thank You
    • Stuck tape -- Thank You (29 lines)
      From: Christina Hostetter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:42:48 -0400

66. Tape baking
    • Tape baking (33 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:07:38 -0400

67. Tape bias (?) (was Re: [ARSCLIST] 2GB limit for audio file formats)
    • Tape bias (?) (was Re: [ARSCLIST] 2GB limit for audio file formats) (36 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 07:26:28 -0700

68. TAPE questionnaire on audiovisual collections
    • TAPE questionnaire on audiovisual collections (61 lines)
      From: Ecpa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:11:32 +0200

69. Tape Recorders for Auditioning- Fill in the blank! Plain text version
    • Re: Tape Recorders for Auditioning- Fill in the blank! Plain text version (95 lines)
      From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 08:32:46 -0700
    • Re: Tape Recorders for Auditioning- Fill in the blank! Plain text version (56 lines)
      From: Eugene Audio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:33:29 -0400
    • Re: Tape Recorders for Auditioning- Fill in the blank! Plain text version (24 lines)
      From: steven austin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:26:01 -0700

70. Tape recorders for auditioning: Fill in the blanks?
    • Re: Tape recorders for auditioning: Fill in the blanks? (29 lines)
      From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 08:13:04 -0700

71. TAPE workshop on management of audiovisual collections, Amsterdam, 28 September-4 October 2005
    • TAPE workshop on management of audiovisual collections, Amsterdam, 28 September-4 October 2005 (93 lines)
      From: Ecpa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:46:52 +0200

72. Testing DVDs
    • Testing DVDs (31 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 22:28:48 -1000
    • Re: Testing DVDs (26 lines)
      From: Damien Moody <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 07:19:06 -0400
    • Re: Testing DVDs (52 lines)
      From: seva <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:37:45 -0400
    • Re: Testing DVDs (36 lines)
      From: Nigel Champion (ARTS ANT) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:47:09 +1200
    • Re: Testing DVDs (101 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:43:06 -0400
    • Re: Testing DVDs (124 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:02:10 -0400
    • Re: Testing DVDs (40 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:21:50 -0700
    • Re: Testing DVDs (154 lines)
      From: Claus Trelby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 21:59:25 -0400
    • Re: Testing DVDs (62 lines)
      From: Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 22:23:51 -0400
    • Re: Testing DVDs (215 lines)
      From: John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 22:22:15 -0500
    • Re: Testing DVDs (273 lines)
      From: Claus Trelby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 02:12:40 -0400
    • Re: Testing DVDs (290 lines)
      From: David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:34:30 -1000
    • Re: Testing DVDs (55 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:16:45 -0400
    • Re: Testing DVDs (360 lines)
      From: John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 08:25:44 -0500
    • Re: Testing DVDs (92 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:13:59 -0400
    • Re: Testing DVDs (30 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 07:34:10 -0700
    • Re: Testing DVDs (69 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:51:42 -0400
    • Re: Testing DVDs (69 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:17:36 -0400
    • Re: Testing DVDs (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:36:58 EDT
    • Re: Testing DVDs (58 lines)
      From: Damien Moody <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:41:45 -0400
    • Re: Testing DVDs (55 lines)
      From: Damien Moody <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:51:23 -0400

73. The Music Wars, cont.
    • The Music Wars, cont. (131 lines)
      From: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:27:25 -0400

74. The Naxos case (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright wrongs ...)
    • The Naxos case (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright wrongs ...) (39 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:46:24 -0700
    • The Naxos case (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright wrongs ...) (48 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:51:10 -0400
    • Re: The Naxos case (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright wrongs ...) (33 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:14:25 -0700
    • Re: The Naxos case (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright wrongs ...) (73 lines)
      From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:03:29 -0400
    • Re: The Naxos case (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright wrongs ...) (29 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:18:29 -0700
    • Re: The Naxos case (was Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright wrongs ...) (23 lines)
      From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:02:35 +0000

75. turntable recommendations
    • turntable recommendations (92 lines)
      From: James Lindner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:13:03 -0400
    • Re: turntable recommendations (132 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:49:59 -0700
    • Re: turntable recommendations (104 lines)
      From: eugene audio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:30:03 -0700
    • Re: turntable recommendations (144 lines)
      From: Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:53:34 -0400
    • Re: turntable recommendations (112 lines)
      From: Daniel Leech-Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:07:30 +0100
    • Re: turntable recommendations (173 lines)
      From: Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:24:35 -0700
    • Re: turntable recommendations (42 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:14:09 -0500
    • Re: turntable recommendations (76 lines)
      From: James Lindner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 06:49:39 -0400
    • Re: turntable recommendations (15 lines)
      From: Juan Moreno <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:20:30 EDT
    • Re: turntable recommendations (91 lines)
      From: Jim Baldwin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:36:08 -0400
    • Re: turntable recommendations (116 lines)
      From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:13:15 -0400
    • Re: turntable recommendations (32 lines)
      From: phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:24:10 -0500
    • Re: turntable recommendations (31 lines)
      From: Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:29:59 -0500
    • Re: turntable recommendations (49 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Kane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:50:46 -0500
    • Re: turntable recommendations (54 lines)
      From: Tim Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:06:49 -0600
    • Re: turntable recommendations (21 lines)
      From: David S Sager <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:53:08 -0400

76. turntable recommendations / Thanks!
    • turntable recommendations / Thanks! (40 lines)
      From: James Lindner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:24:52 -0400

77. VRCS
    • VRCS (21 lines)
      From: Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:32:24 -0700

78. West Texas Music Conference
    • West Texas Music Conference (38 lines)
      From: Peoples, Curtis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:57:12 -0500

79. Wil Graham RIP
    • Wil Graham RIP (76 lines)
      From: Steve Ramm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:50:01 EDT
    • Re: Wil Graham RIP (93 lines)
      From: Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:09:23 -0500