ZNG Archives – August 2006

1. CQL Bilbiographic Searching Proposal -- August 7 Draft
   • CQL Bilbiographic Searching Proposal -- August 7 Draft (35 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:20:59 -0400

2. Diagnostic missing for SRU SOAP malformed packages ??
   • Diagnostic missing for SRU SOAP malformed packages ?? (60 lines)
     From: marc <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:20:51 +0200
   • Re: Diagnostic missing for SRU SOAP malformed packages ?? (80 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:43:12 +0100
   • Re: Diagnostic missing for SRU SOAP malformed packages ?? (163 lines)
     From: marc <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:30:17 +0200
   • Re: Diagnostic missing for SRU SOAP malformed packages ?? (181 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:56:25 +0200
   • Re: Diagnostic missing for SRU SOAP malformed packages ?? (50 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:57:11 +0100
   • Re: Diagnostic missing for SRU SOAP malformed packages ?? (20 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:52:21 -0400
   • Re: Diagnostic missing for SRU SOAP malformed packages ?? (46 lines)
     From: marc <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:08:32 +0200

3. Diagnostics 37 and 39
   • Diagnostics 37 and 39 (60 lines)
     From: Adam Willett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:54:59 +0100

4. Full fledge SRU client
   • Full fledge SRU client (63 lines)
     From: Christophe Dupriez <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:54:07 +0200

5. Functionality mapping?
   • Functionality mapping? (79 lines)
     From: Erwin Wessels <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:45:54 +0200
   • Re: Functionality mapping? (44 lines)
     From: Rob Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:04:16 +0000
   • Functionality mapping? (44 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:13:01 +0100
   • Re: Functionality mapping? (66 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:15:14 -0400
   • Re: Functionality mapping? (120 lines)
     From: Erwin Wessels <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:22:33 +0200

6. Implementing SRU GET/POST/SOAP servers, was: Diagnostic missing for SRU SOAP malformed packages ??
   • Implementing SRU GET/POST/SOAP servers, was: Diagnostic missing for SRU SOAP malformed packages ?? (157 lines)
     From: marc <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:59:41 +0200

7. MARC Context set and Substring proposals
   • MARC Context set and Substring proposals (55 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:26:44 -0400

8. substring proposal
   • substring proposal (33 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:34:57 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (25 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 11:52:57 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (64 lines)
     From: Ashley Sanders <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 12:33:15 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (56 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 12:53:57 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (57 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:18:58 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (50 lines)
     From: Rob Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:36:54 +0000
   • Re: substring proposal (53 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:05:40 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (47 lines)
     From: Jakob Voss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:56:48 +0200
   • Re: substring proposal (40 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:51:50 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (48 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:02:18 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (45 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:18:32 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (21 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:30:10 -0400
   • Re: substring proposal (34 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:36:28 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (21 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:01:56 -0400
   • Re: substring proposal (23 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:07:08 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (31 lines)
     From: Ashley Sanders <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:14:52 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (22 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:39:36 -0400
   • Re: substring proposal (42 lines)
     From: John Harrison <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:45:43 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (44 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:58:43 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (65 lines)
     From: Ashley Sanders <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:14:55 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (66 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:26:00 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (46 lines)
     From: Ere Maijala <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:32:56 +0300
   • Re: substring proposal (45 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:39:55 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (23 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:47:05 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (56 lines)
     From: Ere Maijala <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:41:20 +0300
   • Re: substring proposal (45 lines)
     From: Jakob Voss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:34:04 +0200
   • Re: substring proposal (32 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:02:38 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (38 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:21:09 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (51 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:14:23 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (38 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:23:08 -0400
   • Re: substring proposal (22 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:00:35 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (63 lines)
     From: Mike Rylander <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:06:45 -0400
   • Re: substring proposal (80 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:31:39 -0400
   • Re: substring proposal (45 lines)
     From: Ashley Sanders <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:16:59 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (43 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:07:13 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (34 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:11:10 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (57 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:21:12 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (51 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:35:49 -0400
   • Re: substring proposal (41 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:07:26 -0400
   • Re: substring proposal (141 lines)
     From: Mike Rylander <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:20:43 -0400
   • Re: substring proposal (81 lines)
     From: Mike Rylander <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:26:54 -0400
   • Re: substring proposal (157 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:33:42 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (61 lines)
     From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:55:27 +0200
   • Re: substring proposal (25 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:14:46 -0400
   • Re: substring proposal (44 lines)
     From: Mike Rylander <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:37:10 -0400
   • Re: substring proposal (20 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:21:01 -0400
   • Re: substring proposal (38 lines)
     From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:28:45 +0200
   • Re: substring proposal (35 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:48:18 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (27 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:03:48 -0400
   • Re: substring proposal (35 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:12:41 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (23 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:16:23 -0400
   • Re: substring proposal (27 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:17:28 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (34 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:58:57 +0100
   • Re: substring proposal (27 lines)
     From: Ashley Sanders <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:15:46 +0100