ZNG Archives – September 2005

1. Betr.: Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] - now proxy
   • Betr.: Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] - now proxy (260 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:38:53 +0200

2. explain/zeerex question, and is scan optional?
   • explain/zeerex question, and is scan optional? (61 lines)
     From: Daniel Chudnov <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:44:37 -0400
   • Re: explain/zeerex question, and is scan optional? (61 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:10:56 +0100
   • Re: explain/zeerex question, and is scan optional? (22 lines)
     From: Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:40:53 -0400
   • Re: explain/zeerex question, and is scan optional? (73 lines)
     From: Daniel Chudnov <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:02:43 -0400
   • Re: explain/zeerex question, and is scan optional? (37 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 22:08:51 +0100
   • Re: explain/zeerex question, and is scan optional? (45 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:53:57 +0100

3. extracting title from xml
   • extracting title from xml (78 lines)
     From: Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:13:31 -0500
   • Re: extracting title from xml (29 lines)
     From: Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:14:17 -0500

4. spell checker inside an sru client
   • spell checker inside an sru client (24 lines)
     From: Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:50:09 -0500
   • Re: spell checker inside an sru client (68 lines)
     From: Oldroyd, Bill <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:55:22 +0100

5. spell checker inside an sru client [encoding]
   • Re: spell checker inside an sru client [encoding] (28 lines)
     From: Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:11:05 -0500
   • Re: spell checker inside an sru client [encoding] (73 lines)
     From: marc <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 23:21:26 +0200
   • Re: spell checker inside an sru client [encoding] (52 lines)
     From: Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 16:44:30 -0500
   • Re: spell checker inside an sru client [encoding] (97 lines)
     From: Oldroyd, Bill <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:20:20 +0100

6. SRU, OpenSearch, etc.
   • SRU, OpenSearch, etc. (35 lines)
     From: Daniel Chudnov <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:56:38 -0400
   • Re: SRU, OpenSearch, etc. (22 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 22:34:56 +0100

7. SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog
   • SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog (16 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:56:00 +0100
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog (36 lines)
     From: Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:55:17 -0500
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog (49 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:23:08 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog (48 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:21:53 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog (43 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:06:29 +0100
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog (71 lines)
     From: Mark Hinnebusch <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:57:13 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog (28 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:16:15 +0100
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog (30 lines)
     From: Summers, Ed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:36:05 -0500
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog (35 lines)
     From: Mark Hinnebusch <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:06:49 -0400

8. SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester]
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (26 lines)
     From: Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:32:01 -0500
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (73 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 18:00:55 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (20 lines)
     From: Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:10:39 -0500
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (56 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:39:17 +0100
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (37 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:38:35 +0100
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (36 lines)
     From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:04:46 +0200
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (45 lines)
     From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:29:13 +0200
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (82 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:56:30 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (54 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:00:52 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (97 lines)
     From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:51:53 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (121 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 11:02:41 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (22 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:24:22 +0100
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (132 lines)
     From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 11:36:51 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (153 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:03:47 +0200
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (148 lines)
     From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:48:13 +0200
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (146 lines)
     From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:28:34 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (390 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:03:41 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (17 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:33:38 +0100
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (165 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:38:51 +0100
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (195 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:04:43 +0200
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (24 lines)
     From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:05:19 +0200
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (18 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:44:40 +0100
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (76 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:14:42 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (59 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:29:21 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (24 lines)
     From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:38:29 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (27 lines)
     From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:49:39 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (192 lines)
     From: Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:54:37 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (22 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 22:14:11 +0100
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (26 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 22:30:42 +0100
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (75 lines)
     From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:59:01 +0200
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (20 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 07:24:16 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (501 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:06:20 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (22 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:48:04 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (453 lines)
     From: Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:10:44 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (660 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:28:16 -0400
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (18 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:12:08 +0100
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (35 lines)
     From: Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:42:59 -0400

9. SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] - now proxy
   • Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] - now proxy (243 lines)
     From: Oldroyd, Bill <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:32:14 +0100

10. VS: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester]
    • VS: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester] (81 lines)
      From: Pauli Porkka <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:06:26 +0300