ZNG Archives – January 2005

1. Adlib Base profile
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (62 lines)
     From: Hedzer Westra <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:07:49 +0100
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (95 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:06:10 +0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (102 lines)
     From: Hedzer Westra <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:45:10 +0100
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (86 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:33:41 +0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (47 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:05:20 GMT
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (35 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:55:10 +0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (25 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:10:34 -0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (51 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:32:54 +0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (31 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:42:32 -0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (44 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:44:17 -0500
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (32 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:56:45 -0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (43 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:06:08 +0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (51 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:19:16 -0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (16 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:21:35 -0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (38 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:29:16 +0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (46 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:38:54 -0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (52 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:50:50 -0500
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (58 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:59:42 -0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (41 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:20:18 +0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (22 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:24:30 -0500
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (38 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:44:19 -0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (60 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:49:30 GMT
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (41 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:09:50 -0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (38 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:25:22 +0100
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (43 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:31:03 +0000
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (50 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:59:54 GMT
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (35 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:03:00 GMT
   • Re: Adlib Base profile (40 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:27:30 +0000

2. Betr.: Re: DC elements (Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set)
   • Betr.: Re: DC elements (Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set) (35 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:34:07 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: DC elements (Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set) (36 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:07:25 GMT
   • Re: Betr.: Re: DC elements (Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set) (46 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:53:13 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: Re: DC elements (Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set) (54 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:05:35 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: DC elements (Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set) (36 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:59:42 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: Re: DC elements (Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set) (29 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:15:23 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: Re: DC elements (Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set) (52 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:55:33 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: DC elements (Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set) (47 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:23:19 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: Re: DC elements (Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set) (38 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:29:22 +0000

3. Betr.: Re: Unsolicited response data
   • Betr.: Re: Unsolicited response data (47 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:15:46 +0100

4. Betr.: serverChoice interpretations
   • Betr.: serverChoice interpretations (28 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:16:27 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: serverChoice interpretations (21 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:01:33 -0000
   • Re: Betr.: serverChoice interpretations (46 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:47:37 GMT
   • Re: Betr.: serverChoice interpretations (38 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:52:06 GMT
   • Re: Betr.: serverChoice interpretations (28 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:12:38 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: serverChoice interpretations (57 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:23:33 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: serverChoice interpretations (44 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:34:33 -0500
   • Re: Betr.: serverChoice interpretations (39 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:10:13 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: serverChoice interpretations (73 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:16:02 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: serverChoice interpretations (23 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:29:27 -0000
   • Re: Betr.: serverChoice interpretations (41 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:50:37 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: serverChoice interpretations (59 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:00:50 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: serverChoice interpretations (35 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:01:43 +0000

5. Betr.: Unsolicited response data (Re: British Library Test SRU Service)
   • Betr.: Unsolicited response data (Re: British Library Test SRU Service) (51 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:22:03 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Unsolicited response data (Re: British Library Test SRU Service) (37 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:16:25 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: Unsolicited response data (Re: British Library Test SRU Service) (42 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:08:35 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Unsolicited response data (Re: British Library Test SRU Service) (26 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:30:25 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: Unsolicited response data (Re: British Library Test SRU Service) (33 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:24:37 +0100

6. British Library Test SRU Service
   • Re: British Library Test SRU Service (61 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:38:42 GMT
   • Re: British Library Test SRU Service (16 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:43:43 -0500

7. context set for gis
   • context set for gis (43 lines)
     From: KAROL GUZMAN <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:47:49 -0600
   • Re: context set for gis (33 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:30:11 -0500
   • Re: context set for gis (25 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:31:20 +0000
   • Re: context set for gis (30 lines)
     From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:53:28 +0000
   • Re: context set for gis (62 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:15:40 GMT
   • Re: context set for gis (25 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:42:52 -0000

8. DC elements
   • Re: DC elements (21 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:50:39 -0500
   • Re: DC elements (31 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:55:13 +0000

9. DC elements (Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set)
   • DC elements (Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set) (36 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:46:34 -0500
   • Re: DC elements (Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set) (84 lines)
     From: Thomas G. Habing <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:19:41 -0600
   • Re: DC elements (Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set) (55 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:24:53 +0000
   • Re: DC elements (Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set) (35 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:48:30 -0500
   • Re: DC elements (Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set) (40 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 00:09:05 +0000

10. Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients
    • Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (206 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:21:44 -0500
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (24 lines)
      From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:46:03 +0000
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (35 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:08:33 -0500
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (25 lines)
      From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:34:26 +0000
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (33 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:43:25 +0000
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (42 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:47:39 -0000
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (68 lines)
      From: Marc Cromme <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:57:24 +0100
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (49 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:57:13 +0000
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (47 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:20:11 -0000
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (40 lines)
      From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:25:01 +0000
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (28 lines)
      From: Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:10:07 +0100
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (19 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:36:31 -0000
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (30 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:45:57 -0000
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (28 lines)
      From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:02:36 +0000
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (42 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:22:21 +0100
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (41 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:52:47 -0500
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (27 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:57:29 -0500
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (36 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:20:01 +0000
    • Re: Efficiency of SRW vs. SRU clients (36 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:57:26 -0000

11. GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set
    • GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set (20 lines)
      From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:39:27 -0500
    • Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set (53 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:49:12 GMT
    • Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set (26 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:21:29 -0500
    • Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set (70 lines)
      From: Thomas G. Habing <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:34:37 -0600
    • Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set (41 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:09:52 +0000
    • Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set (34 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:10:28 -0500
    • Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set (82 lines)
      From: Thomas G. Habing <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:54:45 -0600
    • Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set (44 lines)
      From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:06:04 +0000
    • Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set (34 lines)
      From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:17:31 +0000
    • Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set (75 lines)
      From: Thomas G. Habing <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:45:40 -0600

12. gils.title vs. dc.title
    • gils.title vs. dc.title (37 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:40:06 -0500
    • Re: gils.title vs. dc.title (34 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:11:49 +0000
    • Re: gils.title vs. dc.title (39 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:14:31 -0500
    • Re: gils.title vs. dc.title (18 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:27:00 -0500
    • Re: gils.title vs. dc.title (46 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:30:07 -0500
    • Re: gils.title vs. dc.title (50 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:32:34 -0500
    • Re: gils.title vs. dc.title (40 lines)
      From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:11:34 +0000
    • Re: gils.title vs. dc.title (41 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:26:58 +0000
    • Re: gils.title vs. dc.title (45 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:28:13 +0000

13. multiple index names with same semantics
    • multiple index names with same semantics (53 lines)
      From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:07:14 -0500
    • Re: multiple index names with same semantics (30 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:36:48 -0500
    • Re: multiple index names with same semantics (77 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:47:45 GMT
    • Re: multiple index names with same semantics (49 lines)
      From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:09:01 +0000
    • Re: multiple index names with same semantics (72 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:11:16 -0500

14. serverChoice interpretations
    • serverChoice interpretations (103 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:03:09 -0000
    • Re: serverChoice interpretations (86 lines)
      From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 13:31:34 +0000
    • Re: serverChoice interpretations (67 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 19:32:05 -0000
    • Re: serverChoice interpretations (23 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 14:40:20 -0500
    • Re: serverChoice interpretations (45 lines)
      From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 23:41:00 +0000
    • Re: serverChoice interpretations (75 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:51:06 -0000
    • Re: serverChoice interpretations (33 lines)
      From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:56:58 +0000
    • Re: serverChoice interpretations (30 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:24:30 GMT

15. Unsolicited response data
    • Re: Unsolicited response data (69 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:03:48 -0500
    • Re: Unsolicited response data (40 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:20:35 -0500
    • Re: Unsolicited response data (49 lines)
      From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:07:41 +0000

16. Unsolicited response data (Re: British Library Test SRU Service)
    • Unsolicited response data (Re: British Library Test SRU Service) (30 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:06:53 -0500
    • Re: Unsolicited response data (Re: British Library Test SRU Service) (44 lines)
      From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:33:13 +0000