ZNG Archives – August 2004

1. (Meta)*Data in CQL
   • (Meta)*Data in CQL (66 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:15:14 +0100
   • Re: (Meta)*Data in CQL (2931 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:51:58 +0100
   • Re: (Meta)*Data in CQL (50 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:55:06 +0100
   • Re: (Meta)*Data in CQL (20 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:59:25 -0400
   • Re: (Meta)*Data in CQL (154 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:24:17 -0400
   • Re: (Meta)*Data in CQL (31 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:12:06 +0100
   • Re: (Meta)*Data in CQL (73 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:17:09 +0100
   • Re: (Meta)*Data in CQL (219 lines)
     From: Peter Noerr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:51:39 -0600
   • Re: (Meta)*Data in CQL (34 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:57:44 +0100
   • Re: (Meta)*Data in CQL (27 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:47:33 -0400
   • Re: (Meta)*Data in CQL (91 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:49:12 +0100
   • Re: (Meta)*Data in CQL (26 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:27:33 -0400
   • Re: (Meta)*Data in CQL (21 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:20:25 -0400
   • Re: (Meta)*Data in CQL (33 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:24:36 -0400
   • Re: (Meta)*Data in CQL (33 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:31:12 +0100
   • Re: (Meta)*Data in CQL (49 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:55:46 +0100

2. Abstract concepts as search indexes
   • Abstract concepts as search indexes (66 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 05:30:10 -0400
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (70 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:02:03 +0100
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (45 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:55:08 -0400
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (58 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:50:26 +0200
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (39 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 06:10:53 -0400
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (61 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:48:33 +0100
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (62 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:51:50 +0100
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (32 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:47:05 -0400
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (65 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:47:38 +0100
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (18 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:51:29 -0400
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (41 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:36:04 -0400
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (49 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 05:42:56 -0400
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (24 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 05:49:10 -0400
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (48 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:25:13 +0100
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (38 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:34:21 -0400
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (46 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:54:21 -0400
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (29 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:22:40 -0400
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (82 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:58:01 -0400
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (29 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:09:31 -0400
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (22 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:28:08 -0400
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (34 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:38:33 -0400
   • Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (28 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:14:18 -0400

3. administrative+ metadata (Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope)
   • administrative+ metadata (Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope) (42 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:48:46 -0400
   • Re: administrative+ metadata (Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope) (18 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:52:53 -0400
   • Re: administrative+ metadata (Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope) (34 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 00:26:57 +0100
   • Re: administrative+ metadata (Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope) (21 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:11:08 -0400

4. Betr.: (Meta)*Data in CQL
   • Betr.: (Meta)*Data in CQL (81 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:34:58 +0200

5. Betr.: Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes
   • Betr.: Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (29 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:01:57 +0200
   • Betr.: Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (42 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:28:53 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (35 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:23:11 -0400
   • Re: Betr.: Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (21 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:31:37 -0400
   • Re: Betr.: Re: Abstract concepts as search indexes (48 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:21:34 +0200

6. Betr.: Re: I need another diagnostic
   • Betr.: Re: I need another diagnostic (56 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:56:03 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: I need another diagnostic (29 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:02:43 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: I need another diagnostic (32 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:24:59 +0200
   • Betr.: Re: I need another diagnostic (56 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:37:54 +0200

7. Betr.: Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope
   • Betr.: Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope (79 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:35:51 +0200

8. Context Set for GILS
   • Context Set for GILS (28 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:26:12 -0400
   • Re: Context Set for GILS (43 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:06:27 +0100
   • Re: Context Set for GILS (97 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:10:31 -0400
   • Re: Context Set for GILS (23 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:20:50 +0100
   • Re: Context Set for GILS (23 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:34:40 -0400
   • Re: Context Set for GILS (34 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 15:13:17 -0400

9. Documents on Categorization of Government Information
   • Documents on Categorization of Government Information (55 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:08:42 -0400

10. FW: Returned Mail: Error During Delivery
    • FW: Returned Mail: Error During Delivery (111 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:57:00 -0400

11. Fwd: Research Task Pane - Office 2003
    • Fwd: Research Task Pane - Office 2003 (51 lines)
      From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:28:11 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: Research Task Pane - Office 2003 (70 lines)
      From: Alan Darnell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:19:20 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: Research Task Pane - Office 2003 (35 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 16:32:01 +0100

12. I need another diagnostic
    • I need another diagnostic (130 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:57:16 -0400
    • Re: I need another diagnostic (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 22:43:41 +0100
    • Re: I need another diagnostic (44 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 19:58:26 -0400
    • Re: I need another diagnostic (43 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:16:20 +0100
    • Re: I need another diagnostic (24 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:45:54 -0400
    • Re: I need another diagnostic (59 lines)
      From: Marc Cromme <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:45:09 +0200
    • Re: I need another diagnostic (37 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:53:01 -0400
    • Re: I need another diagnostic (21 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:13:01 -0400
    • Re: I need another diagnostic (55 lines)
      From: Marc Cromme <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:38:44 +0200
    • Re: I need another diagnostic (23 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:59:24 -0400
    • Re: I need another diagnostic (66 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:58:25 -0400

13. Microsoft Research Pane -> YAZProxy -> SIRSI
    • Microsoft Research Pane -> YAZProxy -> SIRSI (46 lines)
      From: Alan Darnell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:57:36 -0400

14. OAI profile/Metadata scope
    • OAI profile/Metadata scope (40 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:44:07 +0100
    • Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope (62 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:41:05 -0400
    • Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope (82 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:21:25 -0400
    • Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope (79 lines)
      From: Thomas G. Habing <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:59:50 -0500
    • Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope (64 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:26:55 +0100
    • Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope (50 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:16:57 +0100
    • Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope (21 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:06:39 -0400
    • Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope (24 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:09:04 -0400
    • Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope (48 lines)
      From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:35:39 -0400
    • Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope (30 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:57:25 +0100
    • Re: OAI profile/Metadata scope (29 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:22:12 -0400

15. OCKHAM Alert
    • OCKHAM Alert (53 lines)
      From: Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:10:24 -0500
    • Re: OCKHAM Alert (33 lines)
      From: Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:21:03 -0500
    • Re: OCKHAM Alert (44 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:53:43 -0400
    • Re: OCKHAM Alert (50 lines)
      From: Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:49:07 -0500

16. Presentation on Search Interoperability Recommendation
    • Presentation on Search Interoperability Recommendation (19370 lines)
      From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:38:29 -0400

17. Returned Mail: Error During Delivery
    • Re: Returned Mail: Error During Delivery (143 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:39:39 +0100

18. SRW with OKI (Open Knowledge Initiative)?
    • SRW with OKI (Open Knowledge Initiative)? (12 lines)
      From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 02:59:09 -0400
    • Re: SRW with OKI (Open Knowledge Initiative)? (27 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:12:58 +0100
    • Re: SRW with OKI (Open Knowledge Initiative)? (34 lines)
      From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 04:59:52 -0400
    • Re: SRW with OKI (Open Knowledge Initiative)? (46 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:04:29 +0100
    • Re: SRW with OKI (Open Knowledge Initiative)? (23 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:07:23 -0400

19. The case for interoperable search
    • The case for interoperable search (17488 lines)
      From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 04:17:36 -0400
    • Re: The case for interoperable search (29 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:13:15 -0400
    • Re: The case for interoperable search (24 lines)
      From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:49:41 -0400

20. Where's the test WSDL?
    • Where's the test WSDL? (112 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:10:40 -0400
    • Re: Where's the test WSDL? (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 19:45:23 +0100
    • Re: Where's the test WSDL? (35 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 21:03:48 +0100
    • Re: Where's the test WSDL? (45 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 08:50:59 -0400

21. [XML4LIB] introduction to the sru
    • Re: [XML4LIB] introduction to the sru (69 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 15:04:38 -0400