ZNG Archives – June 2004

1. ADLib LOM server
   • ADLib LOM server (41 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:36:28 +0100
   • Re: ADLib LOM server (53 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:37:03 -0400

2. base url page (Re: Zthes)
   • base url page (Re: Zthes) (19 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:59:54 -0400
   • Re: base url page (Re: Zthes) (29 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:46:38 -0400
   • Re: base url page (Re: Zthes) (30 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:38:04 +0100
   • Re: base url page (Re: Zthes) (34 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:01:48 +0100
   • Re: base url page (Re: Zthes) (31 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:08:41 +0100
   • Re: base url page (Re: Zthes) (13 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:36:20 -0400
   • Re: base url page (Re: Zthes) (32 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:43:16 +0100
   • Re: base url page (Re: Zthes) (32 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:40:37 +0100
   • Re: base url page (Re: Zthes) (53 lines)
     From: Larry E. Dixson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:57:27 -0400
   • Re: base url page (Re: Zthes) (55 lines)
     From: Marc Cromme <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 08:35:51 +0200
   • Re: base url page (Re: Zthes) (32 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:05:46 +0100

3. Betr.: base url page (Re: Zthes)
   • Betr.: base url page (Re: Zthes) (98 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:49:09 +0200

4. Betr.: Re: base url page (Re: Zthes)
   • Betr.: Re: base url page (Re: Zthes) (37 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:35:03 +0200

5. Betr.: Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set
   • Betr.: Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (107 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:57:23 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (35 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:42:02 +0100

6. Betr.: Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo)
   • Betr.: Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (28 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:56:01 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (30 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:42:07 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (32 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:12:40 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (31 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:01:06 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (45 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:40:27 +0200

7. Betr.: Re: Zthes
   • Betr.: Re: Zthes (34 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:53:45 +0200

8. Betr.: Unserializable scan response
   • Betr.: Unserializable scan response (53 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:34:38 +0200

9. Betr.: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo)
   • Betr.: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (52 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:59:22 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (29 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:24:02 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (33 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:13:30 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (45 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:25:03 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (49 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:52:44 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (57 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:41:24 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (33 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 10:40:48 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (39 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 11:10:08 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (33 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 11:27:55 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (40 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:24:54 +0200

10. Binary terms in scan
    • Binary terms in scan (28 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:51:19 +0100

11. chit chat (was Re: base url page (Re: Zthes))
    • chit chat (was Re: base url page (Re: Zthes)) (17 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:05:10 -0400

12. CQL binary terms (was Scan)
    • Re: CQL binary terms (was Scan) (32 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:15:38 +0100
    • Re: CQL binary terms (was Scan) (24 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:41:14 +0100
    • Re: CQL binary terms (was Scan) (35 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:21:24 +0100
    • Re: CQL binary terms (was Scan) (44 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:35:56 +0100
    • Re: CQL binary terms (was Scan) (73 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:15:49 +0100
    • Re: CQL binary terms (was Scan) (17 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:51:10 +0100

13. diagnostic examples
    • diagnostic examples (71 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:19:06 -0400
    • Re: diagnostic examples (25 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 17:53:48 +0100
    • Re: diagnostic examples (18 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:09:31 -0400
    • Re: diagnostic examples (28 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:44:04 -0400
    • Re: diagnostic examples (17 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:37:56 -0400
    • Re: diagnostic examples (27 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:00:25 -0400
    • Re: diagnostic examples (18 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:16:16 -0400
    • Re: diagnostic examples (24 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:24:28 +0100
    • Re: diagnostic examples (30 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:23:30 +0100
    • Re: diagnostic examples (44 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:06:21 +0100
    • Re: diagnostic examples (30 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:22:44 +0100
    • Re: diagnostic examples (47 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:50:42 +0100
    • Re: diagnostic examples (32 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:28:10 +0100
    • Re: diagnostic examples (24 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:09:52 -0400

14. diagnostic numbers
    • diagnostic numbers (53 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:30:15 -0400
    • Re: diagnostic numbers (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:42:38 +0100
    • Re: diagnostic numbers (18 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 14:14:43 -0400
    • Re: diagnostic numbers (29 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 19:19:09 +0100
    • Re: diagnostic numbers (39 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 21:14:43 +0100
    • Re: diagnostic numbers (46 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 10:10:51 +0200
    • Re: diagnostic numbers (48 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:56:48 -0400
    • Re: diagnostic numbers (69 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 09:25:37 +0200

15. Explain-ing short names
    • Explain-ing short names (76 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 17:38:48 +0100

16. FW: Namespace-prefix = wn3, not srw.....
    • FW: Namespace-prefix = wn3, not srw..... (54 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 10:11:18 +0100

17. FW: String packing Explain
    • FW: String packing Explain (177 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:18:15 -0400
    • Re: FW: String packing Explain (35 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:52:08 +0100
    • Re: FW: String packing Explain (31 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:12:37 +0100

18. Minor error in the doc.s
    • Minor error in the doc.s (16 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 21:59:44 +0100
    • Re: Minor error in the doc.s (24 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:48:45 -0400

19. NISO Registration of SRW
    • NISO Registration of SRW (21 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:00:42 -0400

20. Relevance Ranking Context Set
    • Relevance Ranking Context Set (23 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 18:52:54 +0100
    • Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (68 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 20:15:25 +0100
    • Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (62 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 20:56:13 +0100
    • Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (40 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 21:30:09 +0100
    • Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (46 lines)
      From: Marc Cromme <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 08:52:16 +0200
    • Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (66 lines)
      From: Marc Cromme <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 09:33:17 +0200
    • Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (53 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 10:33:29 +0100
    • Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (35 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 11:14:20 +0100
    • Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (42 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 11:22:07 +0100
    • Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (97 lines)
      From: Marc Cromme <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 13:01:03 +0200
    • Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (53 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 12:44:57 +0100
    • Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (67 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 12:46:41 +0100
    • Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (61 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 10:47:05 -0400
    • Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (39 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 16:11:37 +0100
    • Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (67 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 15:37:40 -0400
    • Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (93 lines)
      From: Marc Cromme <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 08:24:55 +0200
    • Re: Relevance Ranking Context Set (48 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:02:08 +0100

21. Scan ResponsePosition
    • Scan ResponsePosition (38 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:50:56 +0100
    • Re: Scan ResponsePosition (26 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:17:32 -0400
    • Re: Scan ResponsePosition (39 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:44:34 +0100
    • Re: Scan ResponsePosition (23 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:48:42 -0400
    • Re: Scan ResponsePosition (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:50:25 +0100
    • Re: Scan ResponsePosition (36 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:09:51 -0400
    • Re: Scan ResponsePosition (39 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:14:21 +0100

22. String packing Explain
    • Re: String packing Explain (26 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:38:42 +0100
    • Re: String packing Explain (34 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:43:49 -0400
    • Re: String packing Explain (30 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:43:33 +0100
    • Re: String packing Explain (44 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:14:13 +0100
    • Re: String packing Explain (27 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:13:35 +0100

23. thesauri
    • thesauri (15 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:14:17 +0200
    • Re: thesauri (24 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:17:06 +0100

24. Unserializable chars in Records
    • Unserializable chars in Records (42 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:51:24 +0200
    • Re: Unserializable chars in Records (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:15:30 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable chars in Records (32 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:47:56 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable chars in Records (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:11:08 +0100

25. Unserializable scan response
    • Unserializable scan response (39 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:01:32 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (49 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:31:09 -0400
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (30 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:34:24 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (50 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:50:28 +0200
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (66 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:52:50 +0200
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (16 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:55:07 -0400
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (44 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:45:22 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (87 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:02:28 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (52 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:19:18 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (41 lines)
      From: Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:30:41 +0200
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (147 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:49:16 +0200
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (169 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:59:17 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (146 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:09:45 +0200
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (32 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:05:58 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (51 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:30:19 -0400
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:49:28 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (71 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:54:47 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (60 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:36:08 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (109 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:46:46 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (67 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:38:05 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (95 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:24:10 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (37 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:35:11 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:43:52 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (59 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:38:46 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (51 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:46:10 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (68 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:08:07 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (66 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:48:27 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (28 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:50:55 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (34 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:53:05 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:53:05 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (36 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:22:33 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (42 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:25:10 +0100
    • Re: Unserializable scan response (22 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:38:48 +0100

26. ZeeRex Records
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (36 lines)
      From: Larry E. Dixson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:38:40 -0400

27. ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo)
    • ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (57 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:04:17 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (57 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:39:28 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (49 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:44:33 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (43 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:58:34 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (40 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:52:26 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (56 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:20:54 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (38 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:08:27 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (62 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:38:26 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (41 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:14:02 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (192 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:11:18 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (22 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:25:40 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (21 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:28:04 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (99 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:54:32 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (36 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:58:22 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (42 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:25:50 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (64 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:43:59 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (91 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:01:57 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (68 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:09:19 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (37 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:15:51 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (61 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:43:03 +0200
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (31 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:54:14 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Records (also Attn Theo) (48 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 21:27:07 +0100

28. ZeeRex Searching (Was Base URL list)
    • ZeeRex Searching (Was Base URL list) (42 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:46:09 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Searching (Was Base URL list) (61 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 16:36:54 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Searching (Was Base URL list) (55 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 16:50:17 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Searching (Was Base URL list) (55 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:33:00 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Searching (Was Base URL list) (53 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:59:15 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Searching (Was Base URL list) (65 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:33:30 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Searching (Was Base URL list) (40 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:37:03 +0100
    • Re: ZeeRex Searching (Was Base URL list) (18 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:57:14 -0400
    • Re: ZeeRex Searching (Was Base URL list) (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:07:16 +0100

29. Zthes
    • Zthes (21 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:11:44 +0200
    • Re: Zthes (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 15:10:14 +0100
    • Re: Zthes (36 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 14:47:59 -0400
    • Re: Zthes (37 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:58:14 +0100

30. [Ex-plain] Explain-ing short names
    • Re: [Ex-plain] Explain-ing short names (58 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 20:35:42 +0100
    • Re: [Ex-plain] Explain-ing short names (60 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 21:07:23 +0100
    • Re: [Ex-plain] Explain-ing short names (78 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 21:51:18 +0100
    • Re: [Ex-plain] Explain-ing short names (52 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 14:05:21 +0100