ZNG Archives – February 2004

1. ***Test*** ****ignore****
   • ***Test*** ****ignore**** (64 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:01:39 -0500

2. 1.1
   • 1.1 (20 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:42:15 +0000
   • Re: 1.1 (42 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 13:53:16 -0000
   • Re: 1.1 (32 lines)
     From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:12:52 +0100
   • Re: 1.1 (33 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:03:44 +0000
   • Re: 1.1 (28 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:21:05 GMT
   • Re: 1.1 (29 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:02:28 GMT
   • Re: 1.1 (66 lines)
     From: Oldroyd, Bill <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:08:11 -0000
   • Re: 1.1 (25 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:37:26 GMT
   • Re: 1.1 (62 lines)
     From: Oldroyd, Bill <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:22:16 -0000
   • Re: 1.1 (35 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:11:57 +0000
   • Re: 1.1 (19 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:17:48 -0500
   • Re: 1.1 (39 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:08:55 GMT
   • Re: 1.1 (26 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:34:14 -0500
   • Re: 1.1 (32 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 22:14:42 GMT
   • Re: 1.1 (32 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 01:45:50 +0000
   • Re: 1.1 (35 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 09:22:08 GMT

3. 1.1 release tomorrow morning
   • 1.1 release tomorrow morning (99 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:51:00 -0500
   • Re: 1.1 release tomorrow morning (31 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 06:49:40 -0500
   • Re: 1.1 release tomorrow morning (45 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 05:19:03 -0500
   • Re: 1.1 release tomorrow morning (38 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:26:56 +0000
   • Re: 1.1 release tomorrow morning (42 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:57:21 -0500
   • Re: 1.1 release tomorrow morning (54 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:56:47 +0000
   • Re: 1.1 release tomorrow morning (22 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:06:00 -0500
   • Re: 1.1 release tomorrow morning (30 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:09:57 -0500

4. Additional diagnostic
   • Additional diagnostic (45 lines)
     From: Oldroyd, Bill <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:23:10 -0000
   • Re: Additional diagnostic (30 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:31:26 +0000
   • Re: Additional diagnostic (34 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:15:23 -0500
   • Re: Additional diagnostic (64 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:37:45 -0000
   • Re: Additional diagnostic (22 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:23:03 -0500
   • Re: Additional diagnostic (39 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:32:07 GMT
   • Re: Additional diagnostic (21 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:04:12 -0500
   • Re: Additional diagnostic (23 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:30:14 -0000
   • Re: Additional diagnostic (34 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:06:32 GMT

5. Betr.: 1.1
   • Betr.: 1.1 (31 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:46:11 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: 1.1 (23 lines)
     From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:42:46 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: 1.1 (35 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:29:24 -0500
   • Re: Betr.: 1.1 (44 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:19:05 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: 1.1 (55 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:05:12 -0500

6. Betr.: draft announcement
   • Betr.: draft announcement (124 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:58:18 +0100

7. Betr.: Post to SRU
   • Betr.: Post to SRU (36 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:56:33 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Post to SRU (21 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:58:30 -0500
   • Re: Betr.: Post to SRU (26 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:14:03 GMT
   • Re: Betr.: Post to SRU (32 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:13:43 +0000

8. Betr.: Proximity vs recordSchema
   • Betr.: Proximity vs recordSchema (46 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 02:47:46 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Proximity vs recordSchema (33 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 23:02:25 -0500

9. Betr.: Re: 1.1 release tomorrow morning
   • Betr.: Re: 1.1 release tomorrow morning (47 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:09:28 +0100

10. Betr.: Re: draft announcement
    • Betr.: Re: draft announcement (52 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:25:25 +0100
    • Betr.: Re: draft announcement (44 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:10:43 +0100
    • Betr.: Re: draft announcement (44 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:54:37 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement (57 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:56:32 -0500

11. Betr.: Re: echoed request
    • Betr.: Re: echoed request (29 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:30:54 +0100

12. Betr.: Re: Post to SRU
    • Betr.: Re: Post to SRU (26 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:04:13 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Post to SRU (18 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:05:10 -0500
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Post to SRU (25 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:57:55 +0000

13. Betr.: Re: sample query
    • Betr.: Re: sample query (34 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:52:04 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: sample query (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:45:37 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: Re: sample query (31 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:19:59 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: sample query (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:13:58 +0000

14. Betr.: Re: Several things
    • Betr.: Re: Several things (84 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 01:02:15 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Several things (28 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:57:28 +0000
    • Betr.: Re: Several things (69 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 01:16:31 +0100
    • Betr.: Re: Several things (32 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 01:34:21 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Several things (82 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:51:50 -0500
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Several things (100 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:02:54 +0100

15. Betr.: Re: x-parameters
    • Betr.: Re: x-parameters (31 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:44:51 +0100
    • Betr.: Re: x-parameters (60 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:52:36 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: x-parameters (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:02:23 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: Re: x-parameters (38 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:31:40 +0100

16. Betr.: Re: XPath and Validation
    • Betr.: Re: XPath and Validation (23 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:11:51 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: XPath and Validation (34 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:28:17 -0000
    • Betr.: Re: XPath and Validation (67 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 13:14:07 +0100
    • Betr.: Re: XPath and Validation (37 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 13:29:56 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: XPath and Validation (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:32:30 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: Re: XPath and Validation (80 lines)
      From: Oldroyd, Bill <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:09:56 -0000

17. Betr.: RecordSchema
    • Betr.: RecordSchema (55 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:32:53 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: RecordSchema (20 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:26:54 -0500
    • Re: Betr.: RecordSchema (28 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:33:31 +0000

18. Betr.: release
    • Betr.: release (37 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:57:01 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: release (20 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:01:06 -0500
    • Re: Betr.: release (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:50:02 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: release (18 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:20:23 -0000
    • Re: Betr.: release (32 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:41:59 GMT

19. Betr.: release?
    • Betr.: release? (36 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:55:17 +0100

20. Betr.: SRU Interoperability Testing
    • Betr.: SRU Interoperability Testing (79 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 03:12:39 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: SRU Interoperability Testing (28 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 02:25:11 +0000

21. cql sample queries
    • cql sample queries (17 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:40:55 -0500
    • Re: cql sample queries (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:55:21 +0000
    • Re: cql sample queries (27 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:25:56 GMT
    • Re: cql sample queries (17 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:31:31 -0500

22. CQL: within
    • CQL: within (23 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:03:08 +0000
    • Re: CQL: within (28 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:14:23 GMT
    • Re: CQL: within (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:28:41 +0000
    • Re: CQL: within (23 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 06:46:39 -0500
    • Re: CQL: within (34 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 17:02:00 GMT
    • Re: CQL: within (37 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 17:02:48 GMT
    • Re: CQL: within (38 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:59:36 -0500
    • Re: CQL: within (40 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:26:31 GMT
    • Re: CQL: within (70 lines)
      From: Oldroyd, Bill <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:54:38 -0000
    • Re: CQL: within (20 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:08:01 -0500
    • Re: CQL: within (32 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:35:59 GMT

23. DCI and BATH URIs
    • DCI and BATH URIs (18 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:35:44 +1100
    • Re: DCI and BATH URIs (35 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:33:12 -0000
    • Re: DCI and BATH URIs (45 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:49:58 -0500

24. diagnostic code (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement)
    • diagnostic code (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (18 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:27:40 -0500
    • Re: diagnostic code (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (34 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:33:18 -0000
    • Re: diagnostic code (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:28:22 +0000
    • Re: diagnostic code (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (23 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:38:36 -0500
    • Re: diagnostic code (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (38 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:39:43 +0000

25. draft announcement
    • draft announcement (99 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:08:05 -0500
    • Re: draft announcement (148 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:07:56 -0500
    • Re: draft announcement (154 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:24:37 -0500
    • Re: draft announcement (173 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:34:26 -0500
    • Re: draft announcement (28 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:06:24 +0000
    • Re: draft announcement (66 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:35:34 GMT
    • Re: draft announcement (35 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:44:29 +0000
    • Re: draft announcement (32 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:05:18 -0500
    • Re: draft announcement (40 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:50:42 +0000
    • Re: draft announcement (55 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:27:44 +0100
    • Re: draft announcement (43 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:35:49 GMT
    • Re: draft announcement (30 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:43:25 -0500
    • Re: draft announcement (32 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:40:10 +0000
    • Re: draft announcement (19 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:59:38 -0500
    • Re: draft announcement (45 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:06:38 -0500
    • Re: draft announcement (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:01:53 +0000
    • Re: draft announcement (33 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:10:55 -0500
    • Re: draft announcement (36 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:39:03 GMT
    • Re: draft announcement (21 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:10:49 -0500
    • Re: draft announcement (32 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:48:56 +0000
    • Re: draft announcement (35 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:07:31 GMT
    • Re: draft announcement (29 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 21:47:49 +1100

26. Dublin Core profile for CQL?
    • Dublin Core profile for CQL? (37 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:05:28 +1100

27. Dumb Clients are Pretty Dumb!
    • Dumb Clients are Pretty Dumb! (51 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 17:00:57 -0500
    • Re: Dumb Clients are Pretty Dumb! (26 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 22:09:44 GMT
    • Re: Dumb Clients are Pretty Dumb! (31 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 17:26:38 -0500
    • Re: Dumb Clients are Pretty Dumb! (44 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 22:16:21 +0000
    • Re: Dumb Clients are Pretty Dumb! (48 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 22:32:50 +0000
    • Re: Dumb Clients are Pretty Dumb! (46 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 23:21:30 GMT
    • Re: Dumb Clients are Pretty Dumb! (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:48:18 +0000
    • Re: Dumb Clients are Pretty Dumb! (29 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:04:51 GMT

28. echoed request
    • echoed request (17 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:01:22 +0100
    • Re: echoed request (22 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:05:47 -0500
    • Re: echoed request (28 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:55:06 +0000

29. Error in Scan Documentation
    • Error in Scan Documentation (18 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:27:53 -0500
    • Re: Error in Scan Documentation (30 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:36:02 +0000
    • Re: Error in Scan Documentation (49 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 20:48:04 -0000

30. files
    • files (137 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:29:13 -0500
    • Re: files (41 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:03:52 -0000
    • Re: files (25 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:57:12 +0000
    • Re: files (54 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:31:52 -0500

31. Help with SRW response
    • Re: Help with SRW response (42 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:02:25 -0000

32. Matthew: Schema change 2
    • Matthew: Schema change 2 (43 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:38:17 +0000
    • Re: Matthew: Schema change 2 (65 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 13:35:16 -0000
    • Re: Matthew: Schema change 2 (84 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:41:37 +0100
    • Re: Matthew: Schema change 2 (84 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 08:53:46 -0500
    • Re: Matthew: Schema change 2 (106 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 21:20:31 -0000

33. namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement)
    • namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (13 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:04:22 -0500
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (22 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:06:40 -0500
    • namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (23 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:26:45 +0100
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (120 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:02:09 -0500
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (35 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:06:32 GMT
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (29 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:00:30 +0000
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (57 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:23:11 +0100
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (30 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:42:22 -0500
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (43 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:01:35 +0000
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (31 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:24:28 -0500
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (26 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:11:32 -0500
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (41 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:19:16 -0500
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (27 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:24:47 -0500
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:14:31 +0000
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:20:56 +0000
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (18 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:41:27 -0500
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:36:29 +0000
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (17 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:01:09 -0500
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (26 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 23:57:37 +0100
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:43:10 +0000
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (26 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 02:10:36 +0100
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (32 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:44:41 +0100
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (89 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:12:17 GMT
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (98 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:27:15 +0100
    • Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement) (35 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:54:10 +0000

34. new dc schema
    • new dc schema (82 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:44:03 -0500
    • Re: new dc schema (34 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 01:09:42 +0100
    • Re: new dc schema (55 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:27:38 -0500
    • Re: new dc schema (63 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 01:34:25 +0100
    • Re: new dc schema (24 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:47:27 +0000
    • Re: new dc schema (34 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:10:43 -0500
    • Re: new dc schema (36 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 11:22:10 +0000
    • Re: new dc schema (74 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 08:08:20 -0500
    • Re: new dc schema (49 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 08:27:12 -0500

35. New OCLC servers available
    • New OCLC servers available (25 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:04:51 -0500
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (38 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:14:32 +0000
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (51 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:35:52 -0500
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (25 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:37:52 +0000
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (69 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:41:40 +0100
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (86 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:45:18 -0500
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (118 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:50:09 +0100
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (129 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:51:00 -0500
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (132 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:31:15 -0500
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (22 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:44:04 +0100
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (137 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:44:35 -0000
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (155 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:48:41 -0500
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (53 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:48:49 +0100
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (28 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:56:49 +0100
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (74 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:56:55 -0500
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:52:32 +0000
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (60 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:20:57 -0000
    • Re: New OCLC servers available (20 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:08:25 -0500

36. No numberOfRecords?
    • No numberOfRecords? (17 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:04:51 -0500
    • Re: No numberOfRecords? (31 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:07:46 -0500
    • Re: No numberOfRecords? (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:02:16 +0000

37. Operation not supported?
    • Operation not supported? (18 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:24:10 -0500
    • Re: Operation not supported? (32 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 09:32:07 +0100
    • Re: Operation not supported? (55 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:15:20 -0000

38. Port 1080 blocked.
    • Port 1080 blocked. (49 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:49:19 +0100

39. Post to SRU
    • Post to SRU (30 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:29:20 +0000
    • Re: Post to SRU (20 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:56:23 -0500

40. Problem with new .wsdl
    • Problem with new .wsdl (26 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:48:27 -0500
    • Re: Problem with new .wsdl (40 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:55:29 -0000
    • Re: Problem with new .wsdl (42 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:10:16 -0000
    • Re: Problem with new .wsdl (55 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:22:44 -0000

41. Proximity vs recordSchema
    • Proximity vs recordSchema (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:14:41 +0000
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (21 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:22:02 -0500
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (38 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:59:24 GMT
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:56:08 +0000
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (66 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:38:05 -0500
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (24 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:09:25 -0500
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (23 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:13:31 -0500
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (35 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:20:05 -0500
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (20 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:24:26 -0500
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (47 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:51:45 GMT
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (18 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:02:25 -0500
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:17:59 +0000
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (35 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:15:05 +0000
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (25 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:44:22 -0500
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (49 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:26:30 GMT
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (37 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:33:35 +0000
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (39 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:18:13 GMT
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (27 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:37:05 -0500
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (53 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:39:15 -0500
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (15 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:51:44 -0500
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (21 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:55:36 -0500
    • Re: Proximity vs recordSchema (43 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:41:05 GMT

42. RecordSchema
    • RecordSchema (46 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:58:12 +0000
    • Re: RecordSchema (19 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:53:21 -0500
    • Re: RecordSchema (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:06:48 +0000
    • Re: RecordSchema (21 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:29:58 -0500
    • Re: RecordSchema (27 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:12:46 -0500

43. release
    • release (75 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:43:36 -0500
    • Re: release (64 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:00:14 GMT

44. release?
    • release? (24 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:35:23 -0500
    • Re: release? (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:32:13 +0000

45. sample query
    • sample query (19 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 10:11:57 -0500
    • Re: sample query (29 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:09:55 +0000
    • Re: sample query (14 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 10:38:36 -0500

46. Scan and Explain
    • Scan and Explain (22 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:30:54 -0500
    • Re: Scan and Explain (37 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:05:35 +0000

47. Schema updates (primarily editorial)
    • Schema updates (primarily editorial) (39 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:06:14 -0000
    • Re: Schema updates (primarily editorial) (24 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:27:30 -0000

48. serverInfo
    • serverInfo (19 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:41:22 -0500
    • Re: serverInfo (32 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:48:51 +0000
    • Re: serverInfo (87 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:21:32 -0000
    • Re: serverInfo (35 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:31:05 -0500
    • Re: serverInfo (29 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 00:34:40 +0000

49. Several things
    • Several things (32 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:37:30 +0100
    • Re: Several things (58 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:15:46 +0000
    • Re: Several things (51 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:07:17 -0500
    • Re: Several things (21 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:10:43 -0500
    • Re: Several things (30 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:10:34 +0000
    • Re: Several things (28 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:20:13 -0500

50. SOAPAction
    • SOAPAction (32 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:41:14 +0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (66 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:14:06 -0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (38 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:26:42 +0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (45 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:30:19 -0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (51 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:38:30 +0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (36 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:03:42 -0500
    • Re: SOAPAction (50 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:10:14 +0100
    • Re: SOAPAction (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:04:45 +0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (20 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:25:05 -0500
    • Re: SOAPAction (35 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:31:38 +0100
    • Re: SOAPAction (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:33:05 +0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (24 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:05:53 -0500
    • Re: SOAPAction (37 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:41:45 +0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (26 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:42:55 -0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (27 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:44:34 -0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (42 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 17:00:19 GMT
    • Re: SOAPAction (16 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:02:07 -0500
    • Re: SOAPAction (32 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:27:04 +0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (33 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:27:45 GMT
    • Re: SOAPAction (20 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:46:51 -0500
    • Re: SOAPAction (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:57:24 +0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (27 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:36:21 -0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (16 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:35:19 -0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (24 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:34:30 +0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (28 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:47:17 -0500
    • Re: SOAPAction (26 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:02:15 +0100
    • Re: SOAPAction (46 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:30:04 -0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (72 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:01:45 +0100
    • Re: SOAPAction (43 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:31:11 -0000
    • Re: SOAPAction (65 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:51:12 GMT

51. SRU Interoperability Testing
    • SRU Interoperability Testing (49 lines)
      From: Larry E. Dixson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:52:09 -0500
    • Re: SRU Interoperability Testing (37 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:54:05 +0000
    • Re: SRU Interoperability Testing (49 lines)
      From: Larry E. Dixson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:19:15 -0500
    • Re: SRU Interoperability Testing (61 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:20:50 -0500
    • Re: SRU Interoperability Testing (71 lines)
      From: Larry E. Dixson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:34:33 -0500

52. SRU Server Tester
    • SRU Server Tester (53 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:16:18 -0500
    • Re: SRU Server Tester (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 00:37:43 +0000

53. srw a Z39.50 profile
    • srw a Z39.50 profile (14 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:30:26 -0500

54. SRW/U and CQL Version 1.1 Specifications Released
    • SRW/U and CQL Version 1.1 Specifications Released (61 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:48 -0500

55. stylesheet on client
    • stylesheet on client (15 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:36:22 +0100

56. stylesheets and SRW
    • stylesheets and SRW (19 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:59:10 -0500
    • Re: stylesheets and SRW (39 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:57:16 +0000
    • Re: stylesheets and SRW (25 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:10:17 -0500
    • Re: stylesheets and SRW (32 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:07:56 +0000
    • Re: stylesheets and SRW (23 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:34:06 -0500
    • Re: stylesheets and SRW (34 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:23:00 GMT
    • Re: stylesheets and SRW (20 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 06:48:39 -0500

57. SV: XML Schema for ZeeRex
    • SV: XML Schema for ZeeRex (66 lines)
      From: Poul Henrik Jørgensen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:50:09 +0100
    • Re: SV: XML Schema for ZeeRex (38 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:04:02 GMT
    • Re: SV: XML Schema for ZeeRex (70 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:22:29 -0000

58. Using My Stylesheet on Your Responses
    • Using My Stylesheet on Your Responses (25 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:40:46 -0500
    • Re: Using My Stylesheet on Your Responses (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:51:07 +0000
    • Re: Using My Stylesheet on Your Responses (46 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:11:16 -0500
    • Re: Using My Stylesheet on Your Responses (34 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:32:03 +0100
    • Re: Using My Stylesheet on Your Responses (22 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 01:28:42 +0100
    • Re: Using My Stylesheet on Your Responses (30 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:32:10 +0000
    • Re: Using My Stylesheet on Your Responses (35 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 01:49:50 +0100
    • Re: Using My Stylesheet on Your Responses (45 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:51:14 +0000
    • Re: Using My Stylesheet on Your Responses (41 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 02:33:19 +0100
    • Re: Using My Stylesheet on Your Responses (84 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:06:33 +0100
    • Re: Using My Stylesheet on Your Responses (27 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:07:57 GMT

59. Validating XML
    • Validating XML (35 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:20:28 -0500
    • Re: Validating XML (67 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:49:39 -0000

60. within
    • Re: within (38 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:33:16 -0500
    • Re: within (30 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:36:31 +0000
    • Re: within (46 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:56:08 -0500
    • Re: within (36 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:30:55 +0000
    • Re: within (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:23:49 +0000
    • Re: within (99 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:10:36 -0500
    • Re: within (83 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:14:47 +1100
    • Re: within (50 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:20:35 GMT
    • Re: within (90 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:32:27 GMT
    • Re: within (50 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:37:37 +0000
    • Re: within (40 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:58:06 +0000
    • Re: within (56 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:21:59 GMT
    • Re: within (43 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:23:50 +0000
    • Re: within (29 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:47:34 GMT
    • Re: within (26 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:20:43 +1100

61. WSDL Updates
    • WSDL Updates (19 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:35:10 -0000

62. x-parameters
    • x-parameters (27 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:55:18 +0100
    • Re: x-parameters (46 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:29:02 GMT
    • Re: x-parameters (24 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:17:31 +0000

63. xinclude related?
    • xinclude related? (18 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 01:39:18 +0100
    • Re: xinclude related? (54 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:40:34 GMT

64. XML Schema for ZeeRex
    • XML Schema for ZeeRex (28 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:30:25 GMT
    • Re: XML Schema for ZeeRex (46 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:40:08 -0000

65. xpath (Re: 1.1)
    • xpath (Re: 1.1) (28 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:38:57 -0500
    • Re: xpath (Re: 1.1) (46 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 09:20:23 GMT

66. XPath and Validation
    • Re: XPath and Validation (84 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 22:10:55 +0100
    • Re: XPath and Validation (40 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 23:51:51 +0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (37 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:12:42 +0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (55 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:31:15 +0100
    • Re: XPath and Validation (246 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:15:20 +0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:32:32 +0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (36 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:00:15 GMT
    • Re: XPath and Validation (38 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:27:21 +0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (130 lines)
      From: Oldroyd, Bill <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 15:55:34 -0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (40 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:21:49 +0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (107 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:36:17 -0500
    • Re: XPath and Validation (37 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 21:57:06 GMT
    • Re: XPath and Validation (40 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 22:11:06 +0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (90 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:06:28 -0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (40 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:15:46 +0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (49 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:04:16 GMT
    • Re: XPath and Validation (65 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:21:03 +0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (68 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:52:25 -0500
    • Re: XPath and Validation (33 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:00:44 +0100
    • Re: XPath and Validation (93 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:12:28 GMT
    • Re: XPath and Validation (40 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:27:51 GMT
    • Re: XPath and Validation (56 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:18:04 +0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (38 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:32:05 -0500
    • Re: XPath and Validation (41 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:47:46 -0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (49 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:51:05 +0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (46 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:15:22 +0100
    • Re: XPath and Validation (63 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:20:55 +0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (81 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:56:30 -0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (38 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:59:22 +0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (97 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:43:43 +0100
    • Re: XPath and Validation (35 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:25:10 GMT
    • Re: XPath and Validation (43 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 01:09:42 +0100
    • Re: XPath and Validation (41 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:40:16 -0500
    • Re: XPath and Validation (51 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 01:23:36 +0000
    • Re: XPath and Validation (34 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:19:46 GMT

67. xScanClause
    • xScanClause (48 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:18:44 +0000
    • Re: xScanClause (26 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:39:29 -0500
    • Re: xScanClause (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:57:46 +0000

68. ZeeRex Version 2.0
    • ZeeRex Version 2.0 (28 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:17:25 +0000

69. [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (38 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:43:44 -0500
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (45 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:30:20 +0000
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (27 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:29:45 -0500
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (38 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:17:53 +0000
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (21 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:43:59 -0500
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (61 lines)
      From: Oldroyd, Bill <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:55:15 -0000
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (25 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:03:58 -0500
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (16 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:05:21 -0000
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (32 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:53:57 +0000
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (41 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:25:52 -0500
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (59 lines)
      From: Oldroyd, Bill <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:40:45 -0000
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (29 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:33:33 GMT
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (46 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:37:29 GMT
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (20 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:00:39 -0500
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (28 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:33:07 -0000
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (29 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:53:59 +0000
    • Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic (55 lines)
      From: Oldroyd, Bill <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 10:19:25 -0000

70. [Ex-plain] ZeeRex Version 2.0
    • Re: [Ex-plain] ZeeRex Version 2.0 (32 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:28:43 GMT
    • Re: [Ex-plain] ZeeRex Version 2.0 (32 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:30:01 +0000