ZNG Archives – December 2003

1. 1.1 Release Date
   • 1.1 Release Date (37 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:44:42 +0000
   • Re: 1.1 Release Date (58 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:18:35 -0500
   • Re: 1.1 Release Date (58 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:21:52 -0500
   • Re: 1.1 Release Date (59 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:26:47 -0500
   • Re: 1.1 Release Date (35 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:33:04 +0000
   • Re: 1.1 Release Date (32 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:44:10 +0000
   • Re: 1.1 Release Date (123 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:48:55 -0500
   • Re: 1.1 Release Date (756 lines)
     From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:22:39 +0100
   • Re: 1.1 Release Date (26 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:19:15 +0000

2. Attribute lists for queries - what are people doing?
   • Attribute lists for queries - what are people doing? (84 lines)
     From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 20:53:41 +1100
   • Re: Attribute lists for queries - what are people doing? (89 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:27:40 +0000
   • Re: Attribute lists for queries - what are people doing? (62 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:13:39 GMT
   • Re: Attribute lists for queries - what are people doing? (79 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:20:53 GMT
   • Re: Attribute lists for queries - what are people doing? (52 lines)
     From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:15:55 +1100
   • Re: Attribute lists for queries - what are people doing? (28 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:09:27 GMT
   • Re: Attribute lists for queries - what are people doing? (32 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:58:46 +0000

3. base-url includes "?"
   • base-url includes "?" (51 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 05:57:35 -0500
   • Re: base-url includes "?" (43 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 21:33:19 +0000
   • Re: base-url includes "?" (50 lines)
     From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 05:18:28 -0500

4. Bath Profile for SRW/CQL
   • Bath Profile for SRW/CQL (23 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:45:16 GMT
   • Re: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL (42 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:57:34 -0500
   • Re: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL (51 lines)
     From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:29:58 +0100
   • Re: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL (104 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:46:28 -0500
   • Re: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL (84 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:55:29 GMT
   • Re: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL (54 lines)
     From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:00:14 +0100
   • Re: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL (29 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:47:46 GMT
   • Re: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL (35 lines)
     From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:34:46 +1100
   • Re: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL (134 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:32:26 GMT

5. Betr.: 1.1 Release Date
   • Betr.: 1.1 Release Date (48 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:09:27 +0100

6. Betr.: more question on dcx and record schema
   • Betr.: more question on dcx and record schema (92 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:53:34 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: more question on dcx and record schema (42 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:58:34 GMT
   • Re: Betr.: more question on dcx and record schema (29 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 13:21:05 +0000

7. Betr.: New Diagnostics proposal
   • Betr.: New Diagnostics proposal (48 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:00:42 +0100

8. Betr.: Re: No such database diagnostic
   • Betr.: Re: No such database diagnostic (45 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 02:38:27 +0100

9. Betr.: Re: recordSchema
   • Betr.: Re: recordSchema (73 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:15:46 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: recordSchema (45 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:14:39 GMT
   • Re: Betr.: Re: recordSchema (58 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 23:30:29 +0100

10. Betr.: Re: Scan
    • Betr.: Re: Scan (52 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:32:49 +0100

11. Betr.: Re: SRU examples
    • Betr.: Re: SRU examples (98 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 00:10:22 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples (162 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 08:51:43 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples (142 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:40:15 -0000
    • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples (159 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:11:41 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples (159 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:14:23 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples (158 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:29:21 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples (258 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:33:10 -0000
    • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples (54 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:52:53 GMT
    • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples (51 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:00:43 GMT
    • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples (22 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:00:58 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples (35 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:10:41 GMT
    • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples (20 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:16:51 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples (38 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:57:53 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples (25 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:32:42 GMT
    • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples (23 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:34:46 -0000
    • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU examples (27 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 18:43:35 +0100

12. Betr.: Re: Unknown Params in SRU
    • Betr.: Re: Unknown Params in SRU (64 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 13:27:07 +0100
    • Betr.: Re: Unknown Params in SRU (26 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 13:37:34 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Unknown Params in SRU (49 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 12:32:13 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Unknown Params in SRU (54 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 12:51:38 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Unknown Params in SRU (73 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 14:48:16 +0100

13. Betr.: recordSchema
    • Betr.: recordSchema (54 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:59:22 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (82 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:05:13 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (104 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:34:38 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (64 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:46:24 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (30 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:48:38 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (29 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:25:59 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (41 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:47:55 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (69 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:28:23 GMT
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (86 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:22:03 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (43 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:21:31 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:25:34 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (49 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:51:45 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (36 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:04:29 GMT
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (42 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:56:10 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (60 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:21:14 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (54 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:24:04 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (46 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:52:21 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (29 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:58:05 GMT
    • Re: Betr.: recordSchema (31 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:44:22 GMT

14. Betr.: Unknown Params in SRU
    • Re: Betr.: Unknown Params in SRU (60 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:28:41 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: Unknown Params in SRU (74 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:37:49 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Unknown Params in SRU (88 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:00:36 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Unknown Params in SRU (71 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:18:58 +0000

15. Betr:Re:Betr:Re:Betr:Re:Betr:Re:Betr:Re:Betr:Re:Betr: recordSchema
    • Re: Betr:Re:Betr:Re:Betr:Re:Betr:Re:Betr:Re:Betr:Re:Betr: recordSchema (38 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:19:40 -0500
    • Re: Betr:Re:Betr:Re:Betr:Re:Betr:Re:Betr:Re:Betr:Re:Betr: recordSchema (51 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:53:44 GMT

16. context set vs index set
    • context set vs index set (44 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:06:05 +0000
    • Re: context set vs index set (42 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:13:47 GMT
    • Re: context set vs index set (67 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:06:18 -0500
    • Re: context set vs index set (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:10:33 +0000

17. CQL for ranked queries?
    • Re: CQL for ranked queries? (39 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:34:00 +0000
    • Re: CQL for ranked queries? (33 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:39:34 GMT

18. CQL-like Masking Attribute in BIB-1
    • CQL-like Masking Attribute in BIB-1 (34 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:13:43 GMT
    • Re: CQL-like Masking Attribute in BIB-1 (50 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:31:19 +0100
    • Re: CQL-like Masking Attribute in BIB-1 (75 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:47:05 +0000
    • Re: CQL-like Masking Attribute in BIB-1 (36 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:44:46 GMT

19. Diagnostic 60
    • Diagnostic 60 (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:53:02 +0000
    • Re: Diagnostic 60 (41 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:32:21 +0100
    • Re: Diagnostic 60 (30 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:52:57 GMT
    • Re: Diagnostic 60 (44 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:29:01 -0500

20. Documentation and Code Release
    • Documentation and Code Release (43 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:53:24 +0000
    • Re: Documentation and Code Release (61 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:01:08 -0500
    • Re: Documentation and Code Release (25 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 20:59:23 +0000

21. Draft WSDL
    • Draft WSDL (561 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:54:26 -0000
    • Re: Draft WSDL (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:18:19 +0000

22. Erratum: CQL Index Sets link
    • Erratum: CQL Index Sets link (27 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:02:28 GMT
    • Re: Erratum: CQL Index Sets link (110 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:59:47 -0500
    • Re: Erratum: CQL Index Sets link (27 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:48:11 GMT

23. Explain Info from CQL Parsers
    • Explain Info from CQL Parsers (25 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:53:50 -0500
    • Re: Explain Info from CQL Parsers (31 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:40:11 GMT

24. Extensions and Context Sets
    • Extensions and Context Sets (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 22:26:09 +0000
    • Re: Extensions and Context Sets (43 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 23:59:26 GMT
    • Re: Extensions and Context Sets (54 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:47:24 -0500
    • Re: Extensions and Context Sets (46 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:46:29 +0000
    • Re: Extensions and Context Sets (42 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:41:26 GMT
    • Re: Extensions and Context Sets (65 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:10:55 +0000
    • Re: Extensions and Context Sets (85 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:56:03 GMT
    • Re: Extensions and Context Sets (59 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:57:13 +0000
    • Re: Extensions and Context Sets (17 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:09:49 -0000
    • Re: Extensions and Context Sets (50 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:01:25 GMT
    • Re: Extensions and Context Sets (39 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:08:44 +0000
    • Re: Extensions and Context Sets (39 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:37:07 GMT
    • Re: Extensions and Context Sets (12 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:46:27 -0500

25. Fw: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL
    • Fw: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL (149 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:42:31 -0500
    • Re: Fw: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL (34 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 00:53:01 GMT

26. info URIs
    • info URIs (52 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:47:22 -0500

27. more question on dcx and record schema
    • more question on dcx and record schema (53 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:38:08 -0500

28. negotiation example
    • negotiation example (39 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:31:01 -0500
    • Re: negotiation example (44 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 11:03:06 GMT
    • Re: negotiation example (37 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:24:47 +0000
    • Re: negotiation example (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:25:19 +0000
    • Re: negotiation example (58 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:46:01 -0500

29. New Diagnostics proposal
    • New Diagnostics proposal (39 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:46:21 +0000
    • Re: New Diagnostics proposal (50 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:32:37 +0100
    • Re: New Diagnostics proposal (27 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:51:45 GMT
    • Re: New Diagnostics proposal (55 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:27:57 -0500

30. New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar)
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (84 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:26:07 +0100
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (81 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:29:33 +0100
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (106 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:40:10 +0100
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (25 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:31:28 +0000
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (37 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:59:59 +0100
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (35 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:54:35 +0000
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (60 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:25:45 +0100
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (82 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:20:34 +0000
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (43 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:26:17 +0000
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (130 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 13:46:28 +0100
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (139 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 13:15:43 +0000
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (47 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 13:30:04 +0000
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (260 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:15:10 +0100
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (67 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:23:32 +0100
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (92 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:37:04 +0000
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (26 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:22:11 GMT
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (29 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:27:18 GMT
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (36 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:15:42 +0000
    • Re: New proposed grammar for CQL (revised from Yacc grammar) (28 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:38:48 +0000

31. No such database diagnostic
    • No such database diagnostic (14 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:54:00 -0500
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (29 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 07:41:31 +0100
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (29 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:41:12 GMT
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:57:50 +0000
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (36 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:42:25 +0000
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (46 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:59:13 +0100
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (39 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:30:41 -0500
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (36 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:59:33 GMT
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (41 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:12:35 +0100
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (56 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:12:18 +0000
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (32 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:06:01 +0000
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (77 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:44:06 -0500
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (69 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:48:42 -0500
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (26 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:13:20 GMT
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (30 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:41:32 +0000
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (42 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:19:33 -0500
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (75 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:32:30 +0100
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (34 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:40:14 -0500
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (35 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:19:46 GMT
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (47 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:58:26 -0500
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (27 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:39:33 GMT
    • Re: No such database diagnostic (25 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:57:23 -0500

32. Other changes since 1.0.
    • Other changes since 1.0. (21 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:30:24 +0100
    • Re: Other changes since 1.0. (32 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:56:52 +0000

33. Profiles
    • Re: Profiles (45 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:17:36 +0000
    • Re: Profiles (38 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:08:38 GMT
    • Re: Profiles (53 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:01:59 +0100
    • Re: Profiles (39 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:08:45 +0000
    • Re: Profiles (33 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:10:31 GMT

34. recordSchema
    • recordSchema (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:53:47 +0000
    • Re: recordSchema (30 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:50:17 GMT
    • Re: recordSchema (38 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 13:25:32 +0000
    • Re: recordSchema (43 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:15:55 -0500
    • Re: recordSchema (52 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:55:48 +0000
    • Re: recordSchema (30 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 09:48:33 -0500
    • Re: recordSchema (36 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:17:10 GMT
    • Re: recordSchema (49 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:45:50 +0000
    • Re: recordSchema (30 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:07:27 -0500
    • Re: recordSchema (40 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:40:45 GMT
    • Re: recordSchema (62 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:42:07 +0100
    • Re: recordSchema (47 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:04:59 +0000

35. remoteSystemRecordNumber removed from Bath context set
    • remoteSystemRecordNumber removed from Bath context set (25 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:19:55 GMT

36. requirements and expectations
    • requirements and expectations (36 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:19:44 -0500
    • RE: requirements and expectations (47 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:29:19 +0100
    • Re: requirements and expectations (55 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:58:16 +0100
    • Re: requirements and expectations (62 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:05:38 GMT
    • Re: requirements and expectations (21 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:28:42 -0500
    • Re: requirements and expectations (41 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:52:28 GMT
    • Re: requirements and expectations (59 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:56:25 +0000
    • Re: requirements and expectations (57 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:50:56 -0500
    • Re: requirements and expectations (37 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:16:01 -0500

37. result set semantics
    • result set semantics (31 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:10:29 -0500
    • Re: result set semantics (45 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:27:35 +0000
    • Re: result set semantics (23 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:30:06 -0500
    • Re: result set semantics (18 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:52:33 -0500

38. Revised WSDL
    • Revised WSDL (566 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 00:26:38 -0000
    • Re: Revised WSDL (26 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:26:50 +0100

39. Scan
    • Scan (30 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:06:47 +0000
    • Re: Scan (34 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:49:00 GMT
    • Re: Scan (41 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:33:10 +0100
    • Re: Scan (45 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:26:30 -0500

40. Scan (and docs)
    • Re: Scan (and docs) (41 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:59:49 +0000
    • Re: Scan (and docs) (25 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 10:27:32 -0000
    • Re: Scan (and docs) (46 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 11:24:49 +0000

41. Soap
    • Soap (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:48:24 +0000

42. SRU examples
    • SRU examples (741 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:48:51 +0100
    • Re: SRU examples (33 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:55:37 +0100
    • Re: SRU examples (51 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:06:29 -0500
    • Re: SRU examples (72 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:19:07 +0100
    • Re: SRU examples (58 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 09:47:46 -0500
    • Re: SRU examples (44 lines)
      From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 07:54:34 -0500
    • Re: SRU examples (17 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 09:24:26 -0500
    • Re: SRU examples (27 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 18:02:16 +0100
    • Re: SRU examples (65 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 16:30:42 -0500

43. SRW/U Explain
    • SRW/U Explain (14 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:08:56 -0500
    • Re: SRW/U Explain (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:24:07 +0000

44. Trying to Ketchup.
    • Trying to Ketchup. (30 lines)
      From: Steve Yeago <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:37:53 -0500
    • Re: Trying to Ketchup. (44 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:53:05 +0000
    • Re: Trying to Ketchup. (69 lines)
      From: Larry E. Dixson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 08:53:43 -0500

45. unknown "base-parameters"
    • unknown "base-parameters" (42 lines)
      From: Eliot Christian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 06:41:31 -0500

46. Unknown Params in SRU
    • Re: Unknown Params in SRU (108 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:58:55 +0100
    • Re: Unknown Params in SRU (42 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 11:10:24 +0000
    • Re: Unknown Params in SRU (88 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:15:13 +0100
    • Re: Unknown Params in SRU (100 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:53:51 +0100
    • Re: Unknown Params in SRU (40 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 14:51:24 +0000
    • Re: Unknown Params in SRU (122 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:19:32 +0100

47. version element placement.
    • version element placement. (29 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:07:40 +0100
    • Re: version element placement. (29 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:11:53 +0000
    • Re: version element placement. (47 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:48:57 +0100
    • Re: version element placement. (29 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:26:40 +0000

48. version parameter
    • version parameter (30 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:20:09 -0500
    • Re: version parameter (40 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:04:51 -0500
    • Re: version parameter (30 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:26:02 +0000

49. versioning for context sets and record schemas
    • versioning for context sets and record schemas (137 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:38:37 -0500
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (78 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 02:04:58 GMT
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (42 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 13:35:02 +0000
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (42 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:34:36 -0500
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (47 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:05:40 GMT
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (56 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:24:15 +0000
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (59 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:09:35 GMT
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (70 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:30:36 +0000
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:33:49 +0000
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (63 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:22:50 GMT
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (72 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:16:47 +0000
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (75 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:02:29 GMT
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (28 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:57:12 -0500
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 17:02:00 +0000
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (21 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:40:22 -0500
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (33 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:35:14 -0500
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (42 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:48:07 +1100
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (50 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:12:49 GMT
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (66 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:47:18 +0000
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (35 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:49:29 +0000
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (34 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 09:43:52 -0500
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (30 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:21:20 GMT
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (37 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:30:51 +0000
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (53 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:36:45 GMT
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (41 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:35:57 +0100
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:27:00 +0000
    • Re: versioning for context sets and record schemas (28 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 12:10:48 +1100

50. WSDL
    • WSDL (41 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:39:17 +0000
    • Re: WSDL (57 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:53:43 -0500
    • Re: WSDL (46 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:55:40 -0000
    • Re: WSDL (22 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 00:13:53 -0000
    • Re: WSDL (32 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 05:29:12 +0000

51. WSDL/Schemas for 1.1
    • WSDL/Schemas for 1.1 (18 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:18:54 +0100
    • Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1 (34 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:19:07 -0000
    • Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1 (21 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:58:43 -0000
    • Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1 (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:57:55 +0000
    • Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1 (100 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:13:04 +0100
    • Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1 (117 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:42:54 -0000
    • Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1 (32 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:40:37 -0000
    • Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1 (29 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:41:54 +0000
    • Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1 (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:43:32 +0000
    • Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1 (712 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:21:17 +0100
    • Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1 (60 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:20:53 -0500
    • Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1 (65 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:21:47 -0000
    • Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1 (72 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:42:01 +0100
    • Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1 (91 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 17:40:34 +0100
    • Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1 (114 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:12:33 -0500
    • Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1 (48 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 00:57:37 +0100

52. XCQL - its purpose and prefixes
    • XCQL - its purpose and prefixes (53 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:10:19 +1100
    • Re: XCQL - its purpose and prefixes (192 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:02:23 +0100
    • Re: XCQL - its purpose and prefixes (65 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:48:03 +0000
    • Re: XCQL - its purpose and prefixes (63 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:02:28 +0000
    • Re: XCQL - its purpose and prefixes (95 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:31:17 +0100

53. XCQL and default >"foo" thingy
    • XCQL and default >"foo" thingy (29 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:41:26 +1100
    • Re: XCQL and default >"foo" thingy (52 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:38:51 +0000

54. XPath
    • XPath (53 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:39:11 +0000

55. ZeeRex versions
    • ZeeRex versions (24 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:52:28 +0000
    • Re: ZeeRex versions (32 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 21:03:50 GMT