ZNG Archives – August 2003

1. 1.1 Versioning
   • Re: 1.1 Versioning (22 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 10:10:53 +0100

2. Alternative Hotel
   • Alternative Hotel (30 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:57:08 -0400

3. associating url with prefix
   • associating url with prefix (88 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:44:34 -0400
   • Re: associating url with prefix (33 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:01:10 +0100
   • Re: associating url with prefix (28 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:46:08 +0100
   • Re: associating url with prefix (49 lines)
     From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 05:47:19 +0200

4. Betr.: Re: Database info in response
   • Betr.: Re: Database info in response (61 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 16:58:34 +0200

5. Betr.: Re: Short Names Proposal
   • Betr.: Re: Short Names Proposal (50 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:47:46 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: Short Names Proposal (63 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:23:18 -0400
   • Re: Betr.: Re: Short Names Proposal (77 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:33:51 +0100

6. Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest
   • Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (85 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 16:59:21 +0200
   • Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (29 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 17:05:27 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (79 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 16:24:36 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (129 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 09:23:57 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (38 lines)
     From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:00:30 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (42 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:16:16 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (61 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:16:16 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (74 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:19:15 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (108 lines)
     From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:47:02 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (50 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 13:33:52 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (55 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 15:03:30 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (133 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 15:17:15 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (48 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 15:09:22 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (62 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:32:06 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (34 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 16:59:48 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (34 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:22:12 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (21 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:17:22 -0400
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (163 lines)
     From: Oldroyd, Bill <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:42:44 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (86 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 11:44:34 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (115 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:15:52 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (90 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:57:05 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (111 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 16:35:07 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (74 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 16:39:40 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (40 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:02:05 -0400
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (33 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 22:19:11 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (51 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 22:36:28 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (40 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 00:06:48 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (38 lines)
     From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 10:45:56 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (24 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 11:52:54 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (93 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 23:28:21 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (55 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 22:41:03 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (72 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 00:33:14 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (38 lines)
     From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 16:07:21 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (25 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 22:55:44 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (42 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 17:47:36 -0400
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (52 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 00:17:10 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (78 lines)
     From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 00:54:21 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (27 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 09:13:27 -0400
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (74 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:35:54 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (31 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:15:01 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest (58 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:18:48 +0200

7. Betr.: September meeting
   • Betr.: September meeting (25 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 11:52:25 +0200

8. Betr.: SRU + Zeerex
   • Betr.: SRU + Zeerex (216 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 15:04:26 +0200
   • Re: Betr.: SRU + Zeerex (61 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:13:05 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: SRU + Zeerex (86 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 17:11:55 +0200

9. Betr.: SRW and SRU compliance
   • Betr.: SRW and SRU compliance (70 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:18:34 +0200

10. Call for agenda items
    • Call for agenda items (30 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:21:35 -0400
    • Re: Call for agenda items (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:41:49 +0100

11. Database info in response
    • Re: Database info in response (41 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:17:39 -0400
    • Re: Database info in response (30 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:34:08 -0400
    • Re: Database info in response (75 lines)
      From: Oldroyd, Bill <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:55:50 +0100
    • Re: Database info in response (37 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 15:07:02 +0100

12. Efficiency is as efficiency does (Was: Explicit session termination)
    • Efficiency is as efficiency does (Was: Explicit session termination) (51 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:01:26 +0100
    • Re: Efficiency is as efficiency does (Was: Explicit session termination) (92 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:24:27 +0100

13. Explicit session termination
    • Explicit session termination (72 lines)
      From: Peter Ciuffetti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 17:19:24 -0400
    • Re: Explicit session termination (55 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 00:50:00 +0100
    • Re: Explicit session termination (89 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 09:35:39 +0100
    • Re: Explicit session termination (45 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 13:07:30 +0100

14. fundamental objectives
    • fundamental objectives (66 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:04:15 +0200
    • Re: fundamental objectives (77 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:26:10 +0100

15. Hotel for meeting
    • Hotel for meeting (28 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 13:46:45 -0400
    • Re: Hotel for meeting (42 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 22:44:57 +0100

16. meeting page
    • meeting page (16 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:19:38 -0400

17. September meeting
    • Re: September meeting (81 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 09:30:00 -0400
    • Re: September meeting (28 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:38:17 +0100
    • Re: September meeting (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:48:17 +0100

18. Short Names Proposal
    • Short Names Proposal (40 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:38:12 +0100
    • Re: Short Names Proposal (31 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 14:11:15 +0100
    • Re: Short Names Proposal (39 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 14:26:52 +0100
    • Re: Short Names Proposal (27 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:49:37 -0400
    • Re: Short Names Proposal (37 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:05:34 +0100

19. SRU + Zeerex
    • SRU + Zeerex (168 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 12:37:52 +0100
    • Re: SRU + Zeerex (21 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 13:15:40 +0100

20. SRW and SRU compliance
    • SRW and SRU compliance (48 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 12:06:07 +0100
    • Re: SRW and SRU compliance (100 lines)
      From: Oldroyd, Bill <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 13:45:32 +0100
    • Re: SRW and SRU compliance (60 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:02:34 +0100

21. To separate or not to separate
    • Re: To separate or not to separate (20 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:38:22 -0400

22. Unsolicited XSLT references
    • Re: Unsolicited XSLT references (28 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:27:26 -0400

23. xPath in searchRequest
    • Re: xPath in searchRequest (36 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 09:35:26 -0400
    • Re: xPath in searchRequest (94 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:58:49 +0200
    • Re: xPath in searchRequest (35 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 18:24:11 +0100
    • Re: xPath in searchRequest (70 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:52:27 +0200
    • Re: xPath in searchRequest (55 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:12:40 +0100
    • Re: xPath in searchRequest (65 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 11:55:42 +0100
    • Re: xPath in searchRequest (105 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:18:45 +0200
    • Re: xPath in searchRequest (56 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 14:27:25 +0100
    • Re: xPath in searchRequest (24 lines)
      From: Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:55:38 +0100
    • Re: xPath in searchRequest (83 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:25:39 +0200
    • Re: xPath in searchRequest (47 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:15:20 +0100
    • Re: xPath in searchRequest (84 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:53:31 +0200
    • Re: xPath in searchRequest (80 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 15:38:37 +0100
    • Re: xPath in searchRequest (43 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:12:46 +0100
    • Re: xPath in searchRequest (57 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:40:20 +0200

24. XPath Proposal
    • XPath Proposal (76 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:11:47 +0100
    • Re: XPath Proposal (22 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 10:05:22 -0400
    • Re: XPath Proposal (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 19:20:40 +0100
    • Re: XPath Proposal (44 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:30:27 -0400
    • Re: XPath Proposal (40 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 23:37:17 +0100
    • Re: XPath Proposal (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:12:26 +0100
    • Re: XPath Proposal (31 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:58:31 +0100
    • Re: XPath Proposal (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:05:01 +0100
    • Re: XPath Proposal (28 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:19:47 -0400