ZNG Archives – March 2003

1. Betr.: Re: FW: JCDL Tutorial Proposal
   • Betr.: Re: FW: JCDL Tutorial Proposal (53 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:57:47 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: FW: JCDL Tutorial Proposal (24 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:48:38 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: Re: FW: JCDL Tutorial Proposal (38 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:15:20 -0000

2. Betr.: Re: sru default parameter
   • Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (106 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:43:55 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (48 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:04:01 -0000
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (93 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:42:16 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (44 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:36:47 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (52 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:42:45 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (26 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:10:48 -0000
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (54 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:09:22 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (71 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:25:36 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (34 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:11:52 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (30 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:21:17 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (37 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:44:38 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (32 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:46:48 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (32 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:48:03 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (30 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:39:38 +0000
   • Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (23 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:26:56 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (31 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:23:26 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (44 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 18:10:34 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (32 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:06:07 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (46 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:29:58 -0000
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (49 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 01:01:34 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: sru default parameter (72 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 01:43:09 +0100

3. Betr.: Re: SRU portal
   • Betr.: Re: SRU portal (34 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:20:18 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU portal (49 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:57:35 -0500
   • Re: Betr.: Re: SRU portal (64 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 16:26:43 +0100

4. email archive?
   • email archive? (18 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 08:27:24 -0500
   • Re: email archive? (42 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 13:25:19 +0000
   • Re: email archive? (24 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:44:03 -0500
   • Re: email archive? (18 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:46:34 -0500
   • Re: email archive? (25 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:39:26 -0500

5. FW: JCDL Tutorial Proposal
   • FW: JCDL Tutorial Proposal (81 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 16:56:16 -0000
   • Re: FW: JCDL Tutorial Proposal (61 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 16:59:54 +0000
   • Re: FW: JCDL Tutorial Proposal (35 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:36:58 -0500
   • Re: FW: JCDL Tutorial Proposal (65 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:53:00 -0000

6. short form
   • short form (25 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:43:45 -0500

7. sru default parameter
   • sru default parameter (41 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 17:24:21 -0500
   • Re: sru default parameter (32 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 23:32:29 +0000
   • Re: sru default parameter (71 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:20:48 -0000
   • Re: sru default parameter (53 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:39:51 -0500
   • Re: sru default parameter (42 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:40:52 -0500
   • Re: sru default parameter (59 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:39:13 +0100
   • Re: sru default parameter (55 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 08:01:58 -0500
   • Re: sru default parameter (75 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:38:53 -0500
   • Re: sru default parameter (22 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:43:38 -0500
   • Re: sru default parameter (26 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:33:12 +0100
   • Re: sru default parameter (80 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 01:59:01 -0000
   • Re: sru default parameter (42 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:40:47 +0100
   • Re: sru default parameter (47 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:26:58 +0000
   • Re: sru default parameter (39 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:42:25 +0000
   • Re: sru default parameter (24 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:11:01 -0000
   • Re: sru default parameter (41 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:13:36 +0000
   • Re: sru default parameter (23 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:36:44 -0500
   • Re: sru default parameter (49 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:42:56 +0100
   • Re: sru default parameter (35 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 08:44:59 -0500
   • Re: sru default parameter (55 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:56:24 +0000
   • Re: sru default parameter (23 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:57:57 -0500
   • Re: sru default parameter (37 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 02:00:12 +0100

8. SRU portal
   • SRU portal (15 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 18:26:48 +0100
   • Re: SRU portal (26 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 12:31:14 -0500
   • Re: SRU portal (26 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 17:23:07 +0000
   • Re: SRU portal (39 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 17:42:20 +0000
   • Re: SRU portal (39 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:58:36 -0500

9. sru servers
   • sru servers (15 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:06:45 +0100

10. [Fwd: [RE]Re: [korea]Thank you for your answer]
    • [Fwd: [RE]Re: [korea]Thank you for your answer] (569 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 11:33:31 -0500
    • Re: [Fwd: [RE]Re: [korea]Thank you for your answer] (373 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 21:25:22 -0000