ZNG Archives – November 2002

1. -1 records requested
   • -1 records requested (30 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:00:25 +0000
   • Re: -1 records requested (51 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:25:55 -0000
   • Re: -1 records requested (32 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:26:02 +0000
   • Re: -1 records requested (36 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 13:33:40 -0500
   • Re: -1 records requested (58 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 12:10:52 -0000

2. Axis and WSDL
   • Axis and WSDL (58 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:28:46 -0500
   • Re: Axis and WSDL (84 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:47:08 -0000
   • Re: Axis and WSDL (17 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:01:34 -0500

3. Axis Status Report
   • Axis Status Report (40 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 15:48:35 -0500

4. Bath index set
   • Bath index set (29 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:43:58 +0000
   • Re: Bath index set (23 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:26:04 -0500

5. Bath Mapping
   • Re: Bath Mapping (125 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:14:50 GMT
   • Re: Bath Mapping (156 lines)
     From: Larry E. Dixson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:23:36 -0500
   • Re: Bath Mapping (86 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:29:05 GMT

6. Betr.: DC Schema
   • Betr.: DC Schema (70 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 16:32:47 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: DC Schema (42 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 15:34:16 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: DC Schema (36 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 15:39:27 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: DC Schema (54 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:01:38 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: DC Schema (64 lines)
     From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:10:06 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: DC Schema (35 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 16:10:22 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: DC Schema (55 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:58:01 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: DC Schema (58 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:05:35 +0000

7. Betr.: lists
   • Betr.: lists (20 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:02:05 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: lists (33 lines)
     From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:03:33 -0500

8. Betr.: Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)
   • Betr.: Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (28 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:04:07 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (65 lines)
     From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:39:11 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (81 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:04:00 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (30 lines)
     From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:20:47 +0000
   • Re: Betr.: Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (31 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:27:56 GMT

9. Betr.: Re: DC index set.
   • Betr.: Re: DC index set. (24 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:14:34 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: DC index set. (51 lines)
     From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:28:48 GMT
   • Re: Betr.: Re: DC index set. (59 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:46:20 +0100

10. Betr.: Re: echoedRequest
    • Betr.: Re: echoedRequest (61 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:01:57 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: echoedRequest (29 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:44:53 -0000
    • Betr.: Re: echoedRequest (50 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:11:28 +0100
    • Betr.: Re: echoedRequest (68 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:19:41 +0100

11. Betr.: Re: namespace and schema id URIs
    • Betr.: Re: namespace and schema id URIs (46 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:08:29 +0100

12. Betr.: Re: Namespaces (fwd)
    • Betr.: Re: Namespaces (fwd) (125 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:59:26 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Namespaces (fwd) (19 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 06:44:56 -0500
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Namespaces (fwd) (25 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:01:15 +0100

13. Betr.: Re: nine or six months?
    • Betr.: Re: nine or six months? (64 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:47:29 +0100

14. Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking
    • Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking (115 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:25:22 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking (141 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:52:11 -0000
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking (146 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:09:36 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking (41 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:58:18 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking (46 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:34:13 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking (41 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:40:14 +0100
    • Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking (34 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:03:56 +0100
    • Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking (76 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:18:45 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking (25 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:31:41 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:49:51 +0000
    • Betr.: Re: Proposal: recordPacking (74 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 10:47:48 +0100

15. Betr.: Re: SRU
    • Betr.: Re: SRU (123 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:27:03 +0100

16. Betr.: real-life example of an index set
    • Betr.: real-life example of an index set (30 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:58:21 +0100

17. Betr.: record schemas
    • Re: Betr.: record schemas (39 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:08:52 +0000
    • Re: Betr.: record schemas (46 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:32:52 +0100
    • Re: Betr.: record schemas (41 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:30:07 +0000

18. Betr.: The Zthes Qualifier-Set
    • Betr.: The Zthes Qualifier-Set (35 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:48:38 +0100

19. Betr.: Version 1.0 of SRW and CQL
    • Betr.: Version 1.0 of SRW and CQL (94 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:12:16 +0100

20. Boolean/Relation as Term
    • Re: Boolean/Relation as Term (24 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:53:34 -0500
    • Re: Boolean/Relation as Term (32 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:09:41 +0000
    • Re: Boolean/Relation as Term (44 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:16:29 -0500

21. Broken Links
    • Broken Links (14 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:48:56 -0500

22. Comments on diagnostics
    • Comments on diagnostics (6428 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 18:06:01 +0100

23. Congratulations
    • Congratulations (51 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:32:33 GMT

24. CQL
    • CQL (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:16:00 +0000

25. CQL as part of/not part of SRW
    • CQL as part of/not part of SRW (54 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 23:38:47 +0000

26. CQL in Z39.50 Classic
    • CQL in Z39.50 Classic (50 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:45:25 GMT
    • Re: CQL in Z39.50 Classic (67 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:14:00 -0500
    • Re: CQL in Z39.50 Classic (46 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:45:52 GMT

27. CQL Simple Names (IMPT!)
    • CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (170 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:46:52 +0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (41 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:30:16 -0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (182 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:25:25 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (55 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:41:33 +0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (46 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:50:15 +0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (207 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 01:32:04 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (38 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:32:21 +0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (31 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:09:32 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (93 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:42:21 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (71 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:24:12 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (83 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 06:35:03 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (111 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:54:52 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (55 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:40:30 +0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (134 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 08:21:37 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (58 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:36:15 +0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (45 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:55:40 GMT
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (57 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 16:22:59 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (61 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:34:50 +0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (37 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:07:01 GMT
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (43 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:58:34 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (79 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 20:36:27 +0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (118 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:02:52 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (53 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 22:32:28 +0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (32 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 21:59:16 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (47 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:50:36 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (25 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 07:00:28 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (65 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:24:23 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (244 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:28:57 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (256 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:35:47 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (60 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:56:10 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (276 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:01:07 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (44 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:04:22 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (30 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:07:39 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (55 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:19:22 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (33 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:27:08 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (17 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:26:38 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (57 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:17:51 +0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (41 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:38:00 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (33 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:43:23 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:27:50 +0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (29 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:47:09 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (43 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:52:08 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (28 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:52:49 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (45 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:59:31 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (44 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:06:02 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (50 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:55:31 +0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (31 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:37:00 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (26 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:43:52 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (83 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:45:03 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (44 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:59:30 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (57 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:09:05 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (55 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:52:34 +0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (60 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:13:39 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (54 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:28:06 +0100
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (49 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:25:43 +0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (37 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:33:07 +0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (37 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:53:05 -0500
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (36 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:54:57 +0000
    • Re: CQL Simple Names (IMPT!) (57 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:27:22 +0100

28. CQL Wildcards in BIB-1
    • CQL Wildcards in BIB-1 (26 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 16:33:46 GMT

29. cql-java 0.1 released!
    • cql-java 0.1 released! (80 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 20:03:18 GMT
    • Re: cql-java 0.1 released! (96 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:04:32 -0500
    • Re: cql-java 0.1 released! (36 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:44:00 GMT
    • Re: cql-java 0.1 released! (19 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:51:31 -0500
    • Re: cql-java 0.1 released! (95 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:58:16 -0500
    • Re: cql-java 0.1 released! (28 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:12:23 GMT
    • Re: cql-java 0.1 released! (43 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:18:16 -0500
    • Re: cql-java 0.1 released! (36 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:15:11 GMT
    • Re: cql-java 0.1 released! (38 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:57:28 GMT
    • Re: cql-java 0.1 released! (25 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:54:33 -0500
    • Re: cql-java 0.1 released! (50 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:13:02 GMT

30. cql-java release 0.2
    • cql-java release 0.2 (151 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 22:35:04 GMT

31. cql-java v0.3 is released
    • cql-java v0.3 is released (48 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:58:03 GMT
    • Re: cql-java v0.3 is released (24 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:59:04 GMT

32. CQL: Boolean/Relation as Term
    • CQL: Boolean/Relation as Term (54 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:47:24 +0000

33. CQL: Empty Terms
    • CQL: Empty Terms (35 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:15:17 +0000
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (41 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 18:50:43 +0100
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (30 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:59:38 +0000
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (41 lines)
      From: Mark Needleman - DRA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:18:21 -0600
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (56 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:28:09 +0100
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (27 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 13:32:43 -0500
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (71 lines)
      From: Mark Needleman - DRA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:33:19 -0600
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (80 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:37:05 +0100
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (92 lines)
      From: Mark Needleman - DRA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:41:15 -0600
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (39 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:42:13 +0100
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (24 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 13:49:31 -0500
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (44 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 18:36:48 +0000
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (57 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:56:19 +0100
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (77 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 14:04:04 -0500
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (90 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:09:48 +0000
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (43 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:52:41 +0100
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (39 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 22:05:49 +0100
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (37 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:01:10 +0000
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (18 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:21:43 -0500
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (35 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 22:59:05 +0100
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (97 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:32:32 +0100
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (58 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:41:34 GMT
    • Re: CQL: Empty Terms (140 lines)
      From: Ben Soares <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:48:25 +0000

34. CQLParser Python Library
    • CQLParser Python Library (56 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 00:40:05 +0000

35. Current WSDL etc.
    • Current WSDL etc. (27 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:11:17 -0000
    • Re: Current WSDL etc. (41 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:25:31 -0500
    • Re: Current WSDL etc. (90 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:56:33 -0000
    • Re: Current WSDL etc. (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:59:31 +0000

36. DC index set.
    • DC index set. (35 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:13:17 +0000
    • Re: DC index set. (44 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:55:57 GMT
    • Re: DC index set. (41 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:07:21 +0000

37. DC Record Schema
    • DC Record Schema (29 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:39:27 +0000
    • Re: DC Record Schema (26 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:42:53 -0500
    • Re: DC Record Schema (28 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:42:49 +0000

38. DC Schema
    • DC Schema (52 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:42:40 +0000
    • Re: DC Schema (31 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 13:36:25 -0500

39. dc schema identifier
    • dc schema identifier (16 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:55:02 -0500
    • Re: dc schema identifier (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:52:01 +0000
    • Re: dc schema identifier (16 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:16:51 -0500

40. diagnostic list
    • diagnostic list (17 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 09:53:27 -0500

41. Diagnostic well known name
    • Diagnostic well known name (39 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 21:20:22 +0000

42. diagnosticCodeType
    • diagnosticCodeType (15 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 23:10:59 +0100
    • Re: diagnosticCodeType (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 23:08:04 +0000
    • Re: diagnosticCodeType (43 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:53:44 -0000
    • Re: diagnosticCodeType (52 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:07:39 +0100
    • Re: diagnosticCodeType (130 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:13:45 -0000
    • Re: diagnosticCodeType (28 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:02:26 +0000

43. Diagnostics
    • Diagnostics (44 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 19:48:06 +0000
    • Re: Diagnostics (29 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 21:41:36 +0000
    • Re: Diagnostics (46 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 09:58:04 +0100
    • Re: Diagnostics (85 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:22:29 +0100
    • Re: Diagnostics (49 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:25:10 +0000
    • Re: Diagnostics (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 16:02:49 +0000
    • Re: Diagnostics (216 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 19:04:52 +0100
    • Re: Diagnostics (112 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:31:54 +0000

44. Diagnostics and Explain
    • Diagnostics and Explain (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:42:06 +0000
    • Re: Diagnostics and Explain (32 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:27:03 -0000
    • Re: Diagnostics and Explain (48 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:18:15 +0000
    • Re: Diagnostics and Explain (24 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:58:06 -0000
    • Re: Diagnostics and Explain (32 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:55:49 +0000

45. diagnostics, cql, xcql, schemas/wsdl, examples
    • diagnostics, cql, xcql, schemas/wsdl, examples (35 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:29:27 -0500
    • Re: diagnostics, cql, xcql, schemas/wsdl, examples (48 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:18:51 -0000

46. draft announcement
    • draft announcement (90 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 16:28:15 -0500
    • Re: draft announcement (147 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:28:21 GMT

47. dropping the name sru
    • dropping the name sru (21 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:40:05 -0500
    • Re: dropping the name sru (37 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 15:15:04 -0000
    • Re: dropping the name sru (44 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 15:36:03 +0000
    • Re: dropping the name sru (27 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 11:12:58 -0500
    • Re: dropping the name sru (18 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 13:51:04 -0500
    • Re: dropping the name sru (32 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 19:05:50 +0000
    • Re: dropping the name sru (17 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:35:37 -0500
    • Re: dropping the name sru (26 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 19:53:36 -0500
    • Re: dropping the name sru (37 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 09:56:08 +0100
    • Re: dropping the name sru (29 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 09:41:51 -0000

48. echoedRequest
    • echoedRequest (24 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:02:43 +0100
    • Re: echoedRequest (47 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:19:26 -0000
    • Re: echoedRequest (40 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:38:14 +0000
    • Re: echoedRequest (25 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:39:30 +0000
    • Re: echoedRequest (61 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:11:17 -0000
    • Re: echoedRequest (23 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:08:15 +0000
    • Re: echoedRequest (34 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:54:21 -0000
    • Re: echoedRequest (35 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:25:15 +0000

49. Empty Terms
    • Re: Empty Terms (61 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 13:13:24 -0500
    • Re: Empty Terms (47 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 18:23:12 +0000
    • Re: Empty Terms (20 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 14:12:12 -0500
    • Re: Empty Terms (29 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:59:18 +0100

50. Explain: = Relation
    • Explain: = Relation (25 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 16:45:26 +0000

51. Extra Element in srw-binding.wsdl
    • Extra Element in srw-binding.wsdl (24 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:43:35 +0100
    • Re: Extra Element in srw-binding.wsdl (41 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:03:59 -0000

52. First EZNGIG meeting :)
    • First EZNGIG meeting :) (73 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 22:14:57 +0000
    • Re: First EZNGIG meeting :) (14 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:04:53 -0500
    • Re: First EZNGIG meeting :) (84 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:55:45 -0500
    • Re: First EZNGIG meeting :) (38 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 23:58:08 +0000
    • Re: First EZNGIG meeting :) (29 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:51:47 -0000
    • Re: First EZNGIG meeting :) (90 lines)
      From: Larry E. Dixson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:20:11 -0500
    • Re: First EZNGIG meeting :) (46 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:43:50 +0000
    • Re: First EZNGIG meeting :) (44 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:52:27 GMT

53. history
    • history (27 lines)
      From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:29:42 +0100
    • Re: history (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 11:52:35 +0000
    • Re: history (19 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:38:17 -0500

54. implementor page
    • implementor page (21 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:31:24 -0500
    • Re: implementor page (24 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:59:24 GMT

55. Index Data Service updated for testing
    • Index Data Service updated for testing (36 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:11:21 +0100
    • Re: Index Data Service updated for testing (20 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:21:18 +0100
    • Re: Index Data Service updated for testing (37 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:12:59 -0500
    • Re: Index Data Service updated for testing (51 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:40:32 -0500
    • Re: Index Data Service updated for testing (50 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:37:59 +0100
    • Re: Index Data Service updated for testing (58 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:42:06 -0000

56. Index Set: CCG
    • Index Set: CCG (49 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:17:21 +0000
    • Re: Index Set: CCG (51 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:10:05 GMT
    • Re: Index Set: CCG (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 17:04:04 +0000
    • Re: Index Set: CCG (18 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:02:39 -0500
    • Re: Index Set: CCG (25 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:38:55 GMT
    • Re: Index Set: CCG (52 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:53:07 GMT

57. Indexsets and intereferences
    • Re: Indexsets and intereferences (35 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:23:22 +0000
    • Re: Indexsets and intereferences (51 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:42:58 -0500
    • Re: Indexsets and intereferences (40 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:03:01 GMT
    • Re: Indexsets and intereferences (29 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 08:08:04 -0500
    • Re: Indexsets and intereferences (27 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:16:16 +0100
    • Re: Indexsets and intereferences (39 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:03:27 +0000
    • Re: Indexsets and intereferences (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:06:16 +0000
    • Re: Indexsets and intereferences (59 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:36:22 GMT
    • Re: Indexsets and intereferences (83 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:48:22 GMT
    • Re: Indexsets and intereferences (21 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:16:43 -0500

58. Keep those cliches coming!
    • Keep those cliches coming! (21 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:25:13 -0500
    • Re: Keep those cliches coming! (28 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 16:44:48 +0000
    • Re: Keep those cliches coming! (28 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:23:39 -0500
    • Re: Keep those cliches coming! (58 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 19:07:12 +0000
    • Re: Keep those cliches coming! (20 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 16:20:57 -0500
    • Re: Keep those cliches coming! (77 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:18:16 +0100
    • Re: Keep those cliches coming! (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:32:41 +0000
    • Re: Keep those cliches coming! (25 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 11:16:46 GMT
    • Re: Keep those cliches coming! (20 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:11:36 -0500

59. Leaky Abstractions
    • Leaky Abstractions (18 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:21:11 +0100

60. List problems
    • List problems (27 lines)
      From: Larry E. Dixson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:48:43 -0500

61. lists
    • lists (13 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:10:57 -0500
    • Re: lists (21 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:28:43 +0100
    • Re: lists (21 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:34:30 -0500
    • Re: lists (25 lines)
      From: miep <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:36:10 +0100
    • Re: lists (15 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:11:43 -0500
    • Re: lists (21 lines)
      From: miep <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:16:57 +0100
    • Re: lists (27 lines)
      From: Ben Soares <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:59:39 +0000
    • Re: lists (41 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:21:55 -0500
    • Re: lists (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:39:50 +0000
    • Re: lists (34 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:12:22 -0500
    • Re: lists (25 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:48:51 +0100

62. loose ends (1): Schemas
    • loose ends (1): Schemas (25 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:48:28 -0500

63. Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL
    • Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL (79 lines)
      From: Larry E. Dixson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 16:01:08 -0500
    • Re: Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL (53 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 21:49:12 +0000
    • Re: Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL (35 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 19:18:21 +0100
    • Re: Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:50:44 +0000
    • Re: Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL (145 lines)
      From: Larry E. Dixson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 14:23:04 -0500
    • Re: Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL (65 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:29:53 +0000
    • Re: Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL (72 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 11:42:22 GMT

64. Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL (fwd)
    • Re: Mapping Bath Profile Searches to CQL (fwd) (94 lines)
      From: Larry E. Dixson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:17:21 -0500

65. Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes
    • Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes (19 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:03:40 GMT
    • Re: Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes (20 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:44:49 -0500
    • Re: Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes (31 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:59:35 GMT
    • Re: Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes (43 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:00:56 +0000
    • Re: Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes (49 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:03:45 GMT
    • Re: Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes (30 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 15:04:15 -0500
    • Re: Mapping CQL Qualifiers to Type-1 Attributes (35 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:23:36 GMT

66. More namespace nitpicking
    • More namespace nitpicking (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:43:33 +0000

67. More on the Utility Qualifier-Set
    • More on the Utility Qualifier-Set (108 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:37:58 GMT

68. moved everything to zing
    • moved everything to zing (25 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:56:17 -0500
    • Re: moved everything to zing (14 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:54:29 -0000
    • Re: moved everything to zing (144 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:38:13 +0000
    • Re: moved everything to zing (56 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:26:44 -0000
    • Re: moved everything to zing (46 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:30:41 -0500
    • Re: moved everything to zing (24 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:34:18 -0500
    • Re: moved everything to zing (25 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:25:43 +0000
    • Re: moved everything to zing (51 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:44:21 +0000
    • Re: moved everything to zing (224 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:04:39 -0500
    • Re: moved everything to zing (233 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 23:12:09 +0000

69. namespace and schema id URIs
    • namespace and schema id URIs (33 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:09:33 -0500
    • Re: namespace and schema id URIs (33 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:13:56 GMT
    • Re: namespace and schema id URIs (20 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:26:56 -0500
    • Re: namespace and schema id URIs (38 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:41:29 +0000
    • Re: namespace and schema id URIs (43 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:43:47 -0000
    • Re: namespace and schema id URIs (43 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:08:46 +0000
    • Re: namespace and schema id URIs (60 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:55:36 -0000

70. Namespaces
    • Namespaces (79 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:46:26 -0000
    • Re: Namespaces (99 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:52:46 -0000
    • Re: Namespaces (23 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:11:37 -0500
    • Re: Namespaces (38 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:01:38 +0000
    • Re: Namespaces (34 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:30:54 -0000
    • Re: Namespaces (33 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:22:44 -0500
    • Re: Namespaces (53 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 21:40:59 -0000
    • Re: Namespaces (65 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:51:33 -0500

71. Namespaces (fwd)
    • Re: Namespaces (fwd) (100 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:34:27 +0000
    • Re: Namespaces (fwd) (34 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:09:31 -0000
    • Re: Namespaces (fwd) (55 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 06:41:28 -0500
    • Re: Namespaces (fwd) (77 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:03:27 GMT
    • Re: Namespaces (fwd) (36 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:35:25 +0000

72. New Diagnostic for Prefixes
    • New Diagnostic for Prefixes (28 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:33:45 +0000

73. New ZiNG page -- ZOOM reference
    • New ZiNG page -- ZOOM reference (37 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:41:43 +0100
    • Re: New ZiNG page -- ZOOM reference (42 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:48:14 -0500
    • Re: New ZiNG page -- ZOOM reference (54 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 22:51:56 +0000

74. nine or six months?
    • nine or six months? (73 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 07:59:27 -0500
    • Re: nine or six months? (52 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:20:21 +0100
    • Re: nine or six months? (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:28:50 +0000
    • Re: nine or six months? (42 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:00:29 +0100

75. Nov11 meeting in Manchester
    • Nov11 meeting in Manchester (21 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:41:59 GMT

76. One small success story
    • One small success story (50 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:32:15 -0500
    • Re: One small success story (51 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:38:37 GMT

77. operation name
    • Re: operation name (24 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:36:47 +0000

78. Operation name (again)
    • Operation name (again) (42 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:46:27 +0100
    • Re: Operation name (again) (46 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:26:08 +0100
    • Re: Operation name (again) (46 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:33:53 +0100
    • Re: Operation name (again) (29 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:26:08 +0000
    • Re: Operation name (again) (60 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 01:13:43 +0100
    • Re: Operation name (again) (46 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:53:40 -0000
    • Re: Operation name (again) (78 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 08:34:51 +0100
    • Re: Operation name (again) (41 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:33:39 +0100
    • Re: Operation name (again) (88 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 11:00:29 -0000
    • Re: Operation name (again) (23 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 11:15:52 -0000
    • Re: Operation name (again) (120 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:23:29 +0100
    • Re: Operation name (again) (24 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:24:38 +0100
    • Re: Operation name (again) (24 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 11:48:21 -0000
    • Re: Operation name (again) (16 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 11:50:06 -0000
    • Re: Operation name (again) (24 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:38:36 GMT

79. Operation name (again) -- part deux
    • Re: Operation name (again) -- part deux (31 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:51:25 +0100
    • Re: Operation name (again) -- part deux (30 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 11:00:25 -0000

80. Operation name/Delaying release
    • Re: Operation name/Delaying release (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 13:45:17 +0000

81. order of proximity qualifiers
    • Re: order of proximity qualifiers (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:45:19 +0000
    • Re: order of proximity qualifiers (38 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 09:21:02 -0500
    • Re: order of proximity qualifiers (37 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 14:26:55 +0000
    • Re: order of proximity qualifiers (32 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 17:43:47 GMT
    • Re: order of proximity qualifiers (43 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 13:13:37 -0500
    • Re: order of proximity qualifiers (28 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:36:10 -0000
    • Re: order of proximity qualifiers (47 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:36:27 +0000
    • Re: order of proximity qualifiers (37 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:22:29 -0000
    • Re: order of proximity qualifiers (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:20:26 +0000

82. please review
    • please review (28 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:18:50 -0500

83. postponement
    • postponement (14 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:40:29 -0500

84. postponing question
    • postponing question (23 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 07:24:24 -0500
    • Re: postponing question (54 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:54:42 +0100
    • Re: postponing question (86 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 09:45:23 -0500

85. Proposal: recordPacking
    • Proposal: recordPacking (77 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:33:55 +0000
    • Re: Proposal: recordPacking (99 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 20:22:32 -0000
    • Re: Proposal: recordPacking (99 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 20:25:07 -0000
    • Re: Proposal: recordPacking (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 22:54:23 +0000
    • Re: Proposal: recordPacking (104 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:06:46 GMT
    • Re: Proposal: recordPacking (77 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:18:37 +0000
    • Re: Proposal: recordPacking (47 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:56:30 GMT
    • Re: Proposal: recordPacking (46 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:56:31 +0000
    • Re: Proposal: recordPacking (68 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:52:52 GMT
    • Re: Proposal: recordPacking (78 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:05:13 +0000
    • Re: Proposal: recordPacking (46 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:56:42 GMT
    • Re: Proposal: recordPacking (55 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:04:14 +0000
    • Re: Proposal: recordPacking (59 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:16:29 GMT
    • Re: Proposal: recordPacking (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:46:29 +0000
    • Re: Proposal: recordPacking (37 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 23:16:13 -0000
    • Re: Proposal: recordPacking (52 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:43:17 GMT

86. Propose delay of release
    • Propose delay of release (33 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:08:46 +0100
    • Re: Propose delay of release (56 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 08:46:20 -0500
    • Re: Propose delay of release (54 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:04:56 -0000
    • Re: Propose delay of release (21 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:08:02 -0000
    • Re: Propose delay of release (40 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:08:33 +0000
    • Re: Propose delay of release (33 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:09:12 -0500
    • Re: Propose delay of release (31 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 15:31:15 +0000
    • Re: Propose delay of release (33 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:38:52 -0000
    • Re: Propose delay of release (181 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:48:45 -0000
    • Re: Propose delay of release (36 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:48:43 +0000
    • Re: Propose delay of release (69 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:55:20 -0500
    • Re: Propose delay of release (99 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 20:12:51 +0100
    • Re: Propose delay of release (50 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 21:27:33 +0100
    • Re: Propose delay of release (26 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 21:36:45 +0100
    • Re: Propose delay of release (126 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 22:18:15 -0000
    • Re: Propose delay of release (143 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:08:42 +0000
    • Re: Propose delay of release (28 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:17:27 GMT
    • Re: Propose delay of release (157 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:31:44 +0100
    • Re: Propose delay of release (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:33:27 +0000

87. real-life example of an index set
    • real-life example of an index set (14 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:24:17 -0500
    • Re: real-life example of an index set (26 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 23:22:24 +0000
    • Re: real-life example of an index set (78 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:06:51 GMT
    • Re: real-life example of an index set (24 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:10:50 +0100
    • Re: real-life example of an index set (24 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:10:06 -0500

88. record schemas
    • Re: record schemas (32 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 14:29:20 GMT
    • Re: record schemas (44 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 10:22:23 -0500
    • Re: record schemas (52 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 16:17:09 GMT
    • Re: record schemas (35 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:33:22 -0500
    • Re: record schemas (17 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:41:48 -0500
    • Re: record schemas (42 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:39:50 -0500
    • Re: record schemas (34 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 16:57:42 GMT
    • Re: record schemas (31 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 17:00:45 GMT
    • Re: record schemas (30 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 13:51:40 -0500
    • Re: record schemas (36 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:11:00 +0000
    • Re: record schemas (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:11:56 +0000
    • Re: record schemas (41 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:18:28 +0000
    • Re: record schemas (35 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:23:43 +0000
    • Re: record schemas (27 lines)
      From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 08:53:55 -0500
    • Re: record schemas (38 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:59:28 +0000
    • Re: record schemas (33 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:36:10 -0000
    • Re: record schemas (24 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:02:17 GMT
    • Re: record schemas (44 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:28:14 +0000
    • Re: record schemas (25 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 13:45:58 -0000
    • Re: record schemas (21 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:48:13 -0500

89. record.recordNumber
    • record.recordNumber (25 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:12:25 +0000

90. Relation Modifier: phonetic
    • Relation Modifier: phonetic (33 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 19:56:54 +0000
    • Re: Relation Modifier: phonetic (37 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:55:17 -0500

91. Relation Modifier: phonetic (fwd)
    • Re: Relation Modifier: phonetic (fwd) (57 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:19:05 +0000

92. RELEASE: cql-java v0.4
    • RELEASE: cql-java v0.4 (64 lines)
      From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:42:52 GMT

93. response/records/record/recordSchema
    • response/records/record/recordSchema (27 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:18:37 +0000
    • Re: response/records/record/recordSchema (20 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 13:33:36 -0500
    • Re: response/records/record/recordSchema (28 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 21:10:50 +0000

94. revised "to do" list
    • revised "to do" list (68 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:59:42 -0500
    • Re: revised "to do" list (25 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:01:14 -0000
    • Re: revised "to do" list (40 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:06:45 +0000
    • Re: revised "to do" list (71 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:29:12 -0000
    • Re: revised "to do" list (34 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:18:10 +0000
    • Re: revised "to do" list (28 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:37:58 -0500
    • Re: revised "to do" list (253 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:13:47 +0000
    • Re: revised "to do" list (36 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:18:10 +0000
    • Re: revised "to do" list (114 lines)
      From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:24:11 +0100
    • Re: revised "to do" list (27 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:31:21 -0000
    • Re: revised "to do" list (135 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:35:42 -0000

95. running out of time
    • running out of time (47 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:12:17 -0500
    • Re: running out of time (69 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 11:11:47 -0000
    • Re: running out of time (41 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 15:42:22 +0000
    • Re: running out of time (762 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 16:46:43 -0000
    • Re: running out of time (68 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:41:10 -0500
    • Re: running out of time (54 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:43:08 -0500
    • Re: running out of time (38 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 14:36:08 -0500
    • Re: running out of time (41 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 21:19:53 -0000
    • Re: running out of time (25 lines)
      From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 21:15:18 +0000
    • Re: running out of time (17 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 16:36:46 -0500

96. Schemas (1 of 2)
    • Schemas (1 of 2) (351 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:03:40 -0000

97. Schemas (2 of 2)
    • Schemas (2 of 2) (141 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:03:21 -0000

98. Schemas (really updated this time!)
    • Re: Schemas (really updated this time!) (504 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:48:30 -0000
    • Re: Schemas (really updated this time!) (86 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 23:54:56 +0100

99. Schemas (updated)
    • Schemas (updated) (428 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:45:43 -0000
    • Re: Schemas (updated) (62 lines)
      From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 23:54:20 +0100

100. schemas and versions
     • schemas and versions (36 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:09:23 -0500
     • Re: schemas and versions (52 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:46:18 -0000

101. SOAP samples
     • SOAP samples (29 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:43:24 +0000
     • Re: SOAP samples (26 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:07:19 -0000
     • Re: SOAP samples (43 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:13:01 +0000
     • Re: SOAP samples (49 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:10:53 -0500
     • Re: SOAP samples (32 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:28:14 -0000
     • Re: SOAP samples (17 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:41:57 -0500
     • Re: SOAP samples (37 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:36:40 +0000
     • Re: SOAP samples (18 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:24:30 -0500
     • Re: SOAP samples (19 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:54:07 -0500

102. SOAP Types
     • SOAP Types (43 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:08:30 +0000
     • Re: SOAP Types (50 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:37:39 +0000
     • Re: SOAP Types (27 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:41:40 +0000
     • Re: SOAP Types (29 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:30:25 -0000
     • Re: SOAP Types (22 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:30:26 -0000
     • Re: SOAP Types (36 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:30:28 -0000
     • Re: SOAP Types (25 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:40:25 -0000
     • Re: SOAP Types (21 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:40:26 -0000
     • Re: SOAP Types (30 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 00:46:17 +0100
     • Re: SOAP Types (27 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:33:22 +0000
     • Re: SOAP Types (39 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 00:53:56 +0100
     • Re: SOAP Types (40 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:36:47 +0000
     • Re: SOAP Types (50 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:45:38 +0000
     • Re: SOAP Types (33 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:48:33 +0000
     • Re: SOAP Types (29 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 00:19:34 -0000
     • Re: SOAP Types (56 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 00:05:52 +0000
     • Re: SOAP Types (34 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 00:17:48 +0000

103. speak up
     • speak up (15 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:59:48 -0500
     • Re: speak up (25 lines)
       From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:08:05 -0500

104. spec review
     • spec review (47 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:30:43 -0500
     • Re: spec review (35 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 20:38:16 +0000

105. SRU
     • SRU (18 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:39:37 -0500
     • Re: SRU (51 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:16:35 +0000
     • Re: SRU (282 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:43:49 -0000
     • Re: SRU (74 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:52:03 -0500
     • SRU (17 lines)
       From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 17:49:45 +0100
     • Re: SRU (34 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 16:51:03 +0000
     • Re: SRU (41 lines)
       From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 19:47:45 +0100
     • Re: SRU (58 lines)
       From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 22:33:49 +0100
     • Re: SRU (37 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 22:05:40 -0000
     • Re: SRU (39 lines)
       From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 23:17:32 +0100
     • Re: SRU (29 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 23:37:37 -0000
     • Re: SRU (25 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:10:52 GMT
     • Re: SRU (55 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:17:32 GMT
     • Re: SRU (32 lines)
       From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:36:22 +0100
     • Re: SRU (39 lines)
       From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:39:40 +0100
     • Re: SRU (29 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:39:37 +0100
     • Re: SRU (22 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:46:39 -0000
     • Re: SRU (35 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:59:46 +0000
     • Re: SRU (44 lines)
       From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 08:22:36 -0500
     • Re: SRU (78 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:30:15 -0000
     • Re: SRU (33 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:21:15 +0000
     • Re: SRU (42 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:41:59 GMT
     • Re: SRU (18 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:36:34 -0500
     • Re: SRU (100 lines)
       From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:27:18 -0500

106. SRU: echoedRequest
     • SRU: echoedRequest (54 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:23:19 +0000

107. SRW and SRU samples (updates)
     • SRW and SRU samples (updates) (384 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:05:51 -0000

108. Str vs XML, SortSpec
     • Str vs XML, SortSpec (69 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 14:50:52 +0000

109. supported record schemas
     • supported record schemas (30 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:22:44 -0500

110. synchronizing
     • synchronizing (28 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:21:18 -0500
     • Re: synchronizing (45 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:43:50 -0000

111. tasks
     • tasks (27 lines)
       From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 10:45:23 -0500

112. Testing Listserv
     • Testing Listserv (11 lines)
       From: Larry E. Dixson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:09:13 -0500

113. thanks Rob!
     • thanks Rob! (31 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 17:37:03 -0500
     • Re: thanks Rob! (30 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 22:52:32 +0000

114. The Zthes Qualifier-Set
     • The Zthes Qualifier-Set (71 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:58:39 GMT

115. to do
     • to do (551 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:13:21 -0500
     • Re: to do (122 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:44:00 GMT
     • Re: to do (23 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:11:17 -0000
     • Re: to do (42 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:17:21 +0000
     • Re: to do (71 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:41:04 +0000
     • Re: to do (32 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:48:13 -0000
     • Re: to do (54 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:04:54 +0000
     • Re: to do (56 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:29:39 GMT
     • Re: to do (76 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:26:02 +0100
     • Re: to do (47 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 19:44:13 -0000
     • Re: to do (66 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:39:27 +0000
     • Re: to do (65 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:21:48 +0000
     • Re: to do (34 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:53:43 -0000
     • Re: to do (90 lines)
       From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:17:51 +0100
     • Re: to do (79 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:21:50 +0100
     • Re: to do (47 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 23:54:25 -0000
     • Re: to do (38 lines)
       From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:32:01 +0100
     • Re: to do (40 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:34:30 +0000
     • Re: to do (19 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:18:04 -0500
     • Re: to do (31 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:40:41 GMT
     • Re: to do (203 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:44:17 +0000
     • Re: to do (45 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:39:52 -0500
     • Re: to do (29 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 23:56:43 -0000
     • Re: to do (34 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:02:17 -0000
     • Re: to do (37 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:12:55 GMT
     • Re: to do (76 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:27:34 GMT
     • Re: to do (56 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:45:32 -0000
     • Re: to do (34 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:56:26 -0000
     • Re: to do (51 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 11:03:08 GMT
     • Re: to do (34 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:46:27 +0000
     • Re: to do (49 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:56:05 +0000

116. to do; add SRU syntax
     • Re: to do; add SRU syntax (501 lines)
       From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:51:51 +0100
     • Re: to do; add SRU syntax (49 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:07:12 +0000
     • Re: to do; add SRU syntax (87 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:41:28 -0500

117. To XCQL or not to XCQL?
     • To XCQL or not to XCQL? (55 lines)
       From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:24:03 +0100
     • Re: To XCQL or not to XCQL? (100 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 09:41:56 GMT
     • Re: To XCQL or not to XCQL? (67 lines)
       From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:21:42 +0100
     • Re: To XCQL or not to XCQL? (74 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:18:16 GMT
     • Re: To XCQL or not to XCQL? (61 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:35:06 +0000
     • Re: To XCQL or not to XCQL? (38 lines)
       From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 08:16:20 -0500
     • Re: To XCQL or not to XCQL? (27 lines)
       From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:25:14 +0100
     • Re: To XCQL or not to XCQL? (34 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:06:55 +0000
     • Re: To XCQL or not to XCQL? (21 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:28:34 -0000

118. Updates
     • Updates (583 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 23:13:30 -0000
     • Re: Updates (53 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:34:10 +0100
     • Re: Updates (129 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 23:58:45 -0000
     • Re: Updates (26 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 01:07:40 +0100
     • Re: Updates (138 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:44:55 -0000
     • Re: Updates (17 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 01:50:07 +0100
     • Re: Updates (26 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:10:57 +0000
     • Updates (233 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:59:45 -0000
     • Re: Updates (32 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:11:36 +0100
     • Re: Updates (30 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:30:36 -0500
     • Re: Updates (18 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:32:16 -0500
     • Re: Updates (494 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:46:16 -0000
     • Re: Updates (377 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:54:28 -0000
     • Re: Updates (35 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:27:01 +0000
     • Re: Updates (31 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:14:09 -0500
     • Re: Updates (20 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 18:17:47 -0000
     • Re: Updates (27 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:16:59 +0000

119. uri udentifiers
     • uri udentifiers (26 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:59:07 -0500
     • Re: uri udentifiers (47 lines)
       From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:13:27 -0500
     • Re: uri udentifiers (38 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:03:42 +0000

120. URIs for Schemas
     • URIs for Schemas (26 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:08:31 +0000
     • Re: URIs for Schemas (57 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:42:49 -0000
     • Re: URIs for Schemas (36 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:55:41 +0000

121. url-syntax
     • url-syntax (22 lines)
       From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:38:05 +0100
     • Re: url-syntax (28 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:00:38 +0000

122. version 1.0 (near) final
     • version 1.0 (near) final (33 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 15:46:12 -0500
     • Re: version 1.0 (near) final (29 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 21:38:33 -0000
     • Re: version 1.0 (near) final (38 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:43:38 +0100
     • Re: version 1.0 (near) final (19 lines)
       From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 08:48:51 -0500

123. Version 1.0 of SRW and CQL
     • Version 1.0 of SRW and CQL (87 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:01:06 -0500
     • Re: Version 1.0 of SRW and CQL (98 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:24:03 +0100

124. versioning
     • versioning (26 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:08:15 -0500

125. We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set
     • We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set (68 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 10:08:26 GMT
     • Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set (17 lines)
       From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 06:43:40 -0500
     • Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set (81 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:20:02 GMT
     • Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set (81 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:22:40 +0000
     • Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set (28 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:48:28 +0000
     • Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set (167 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 14:48:54 GMT
     • Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set (121 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:09:01 +0000
     • Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set (112 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 16:34:02 GMT
     • Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set (78 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:03:32 +0000
     • Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set (88 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:48:55 GMT
     • Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set (60 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:28:24 +0000
     • Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set (48 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:05:14 GMT
     • Re: We Need a Utility Qualifier-Set (50 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:05:16 +0000

126. Web pages
     • Web pages (44 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 16:37:28 -0500
     • Re: Web pages (55 lines)
       From: moretti <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 19:40:56 -0000
     • Re: Web pages (63 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:36:06 GMT
     • Re: Web pages (19 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 11:50:04 -0000
     • Re: Web pages (62 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:01:53 +0000
     • Re: Web pages (45 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:35:30 -0000

127. well-known record schema names
     • well-known record schema names (20 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:54:33 -0500
     • Re: well-known record schema names (30 lines)
       From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:10:54 -0500

128. what record schemas are permissable?
     • Re: what record schemas are permissable? (27 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:06:37 +0000

129. White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment
     • White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment (60 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 19:48:39 +0000
     • Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment (81 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 21:42:25 +0100
     • Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment (119 lines)
       From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:23:43 +0100
     • Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment (28 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 21:12:51 +0000
     • Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment (83 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 21:41:41 +0000
     • Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment (77 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:33:36 +0100
     • Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment (148 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:28:04 -0000
     • Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment (37 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 00:42:35 +0000
     • Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment (57 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 07:24:08 +0100
     • Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment (22 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 09:21:55 GMT
     • Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment (43 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 09:25:34 GMT
     • Re: White flag. Re: XCQL as fragment (48 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:12:38 +0000

130. www.loc.gov/cql
     • www.loc.gov/cql (22 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 09:42:46 -0500
     • Re: www.loc.gov/cql (33 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:46:08 +0000
     • Re: www.loc.gov/cql (49 lines)
       From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:20:50 -0500
     • Re: www.loc.gov/cql (43 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:25:39 +0000
     • Re: www.loc.gov/cql (58 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:14:07 +0100
     • Re: www.loc.gov/cql (82 lines)
       From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:19:28 -0500
     • Re: www.loc.gov/cql (57 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 00:28:14 -0000
     • Re: www.loc.gov/cql (75 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 09:34:38 +0100
     • Re: www.loc.gov/cql (28 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:10:48 GMT
     • Re: www.loc.gov/cql (83 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:35:30 -0000

131. XCQL - location of <prefixes>
     • XCQL - location of <prefixes> (105 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:01:18 GMT
     • Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes> (49 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:11:54 +0000
     • Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes> (21 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:01:11 -0000
     • Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes> (79 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:31:17 -0000
     • Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes> (20 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:31:17 -0000
     • Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes> (30 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:31:31 +0000
     • Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes> (36 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:34:43 +0000
     • Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes> (17 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:03:31 -0000
     • Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes> (85 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:15:47 GMT
     • Re: XCQL - location of <prefixes> (35 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:18:17 +0000

132. XCQL <prefixes> Specification
     • XCQL <prefixes> Specification (24 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:40:31 GMT
     • Re: XCQL <prefixes> Specification (153 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:59:29 +0000
     • Re: XCQL <prefixes> Specification (113 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:20:32 +0100
     • Re: XCQL <prefixes> Specification (37 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:42:33 +0000
     • Re: XCQL <prefixes> Specification (29 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:55:40 -0000

133. XCQL as fragment
     • XCQL as fragment (15 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 22:05:21 -0000
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (39 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:36:06 +0100
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (77 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:25:43 GMT
     • XCQL as fragment (46 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:45:13 -0000
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (41 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:25:31 +0100
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (80 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:40:36 +0100
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (91 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:35:01 +0000
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (24 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:45:06 GMT
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (35 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:48:38 -0000
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (105 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:51:05 +0100
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (42 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:55:50 GMT
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (47 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:59:38 +0000
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (45 lines)
       From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:15:24 -0500
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (80 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:15:17 +0000
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (81 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:26:32 -0000
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (28 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:26:32 -0000
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (38 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:26:31 -0000
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (50 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:24:20 +0000
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (44 lines)
       From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 07:36:52 -0500
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (11 lines)
       From: Larry E. Dixson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:11:25 -0500
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (102 lines)
       From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:39:51 -0500
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (93 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:40:05 GMT
     • Re: XCQL as fragment (137 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 20:25:23 +0100

134. XCQL Conformance
     • XCQL Conformance (19 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:03:15 -0500

135. XCQL Diagnostic
     • XCQL Diagnostic (18 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:06:46 -0500
     • Re: XCQL Diagnostic (30 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:17:08 +0000
     • Re: XCQL Diagnostic (29 lines)
       From: Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:36:49 +0100
     • Re: XCQL Diagnostic (21 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:14:27 -0500
     • Re: XCQL Diagnostic (19 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:15:53 -0500

136. xcql.xsd
     • xcql.xsd (23 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:01:55 -0500
     • Re: xcql.xsd (30 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 15:35:56 +0000
     • Re: xcql.xsd (23 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 11:53:19 -0500
     • Re: xcql.xsd (38 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:10:29 +0000

137. XCQL: Qualifiers for Prox
     • XCQL: Qualifiers for Prox (32 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 23:11:16 +0000
     • Re: XCQL: Qualifiers for Prox (23 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:14:02 GMT

138. xStartRecord (Was: URIs for Schemas)
     • xStartRecord (Was: URIs for Schemas) (102 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:29:20 GMT
     • Re: xStartRecord (Was: URIs for Schemas) (22 lines)
       From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:36:25 -0500
     • Re: xStartRecord (Was: URIs for Schemas) (41 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:30:37 +0000

139. [[log in to unmask]: Re: to do (fwd)]
     • [[log in to unmask]: Re: to do (fwd)] (68 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:17:13 GMT
     • Re: [[log in to unmask]: Re: to do (fwd)] (29 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:41:23 -0000
     • Re: [[log in to unmask]: Re: to do (fwd)] (49 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:52:25 +0000
     • Re: [[log in to unmask]: Re: to do (fwd)] (31 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:57:50 +0000

140. [Fwd: Stuff]
     • [Fwd: Stuff] (252 lines)
       From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 09:53:33 -0500
     • Re: [Fwd: Stuff] (44 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:03:44 +0000
     • Re: [Fwd: Stuff] (29 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:13:45 -0000
     • Re: [Fwd: Stuff] (39 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:46:07 +0000
     • Re: [Fwd: Stuff] (62 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:42:47 +0100
     • Re: [Fwd: Stuff] (87 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:54:44 +0000
     • Re: [Fwd: Stuff] (108 lines)
       From: Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:58:54 +0100

141. [[log in to unmask]: W3C Query Language]
     • [[log in to unmask]: W3C Query Language] (32 lines)
       From: Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:59:24 GMT
     • Re: [[log in to unmask]: W3C Query Language] (20 lines)
       From: Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 07:27:39 -0500

142. [ot] Relax NG
     • [ot] Relax NG (26 lines)
       From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:07:14 +0000
     • Re: [ot] Relax NG (29 lines)
       From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 20:57:38 -0000