ZNG Archives – February 2002

1. Betr.: CQL - what do people want?
   • Betr.: CQL - what do people want? (152 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:19:39 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: CQL - what do people want? (126 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 07:51:11 -0500
   • Re: Betr.: CQL - what do people want? (164 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:59:47 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: CQL - what do people want? (47 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:10:07 -0500

2. Betr.: Re: issues list
   • Betr.: Re: issues list (71 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 14:43:01 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: issues list (97 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:24:35 -0500
   • Betr.: Re: issues list (56 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 15:27:08 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: Re: issues list (78 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:39:19 -0500
   • Re: Betr.: Re: issues list (75 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 14:45:18 -0000

3. Betr.: Re: LC's planned SRW/U Implementation
   • Betr.: Re: LC's planned SRW/U Implementation (53 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:10:31 +0100

4. Betr.: SRW test server up for playing with
   • Betr.: SRW test server up for playing with (58 lines)
     From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:42:21 +0100
   • Re: Betr.: SRW test server up for playing with (31 lines)
     From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 11:24:54 +1100
   • Re: Betr.: SRW test server up for playing with (33 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:43:56 -0000

5. CQL - what do people want?
   • CQL - what do people want? (83 lines)
     From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 18:02:56 +1100
   • Re: CQL - what do people want? (138 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:44:25 -0500
   • Re: CQL - what do people want? (30 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:01:02 -0500
   • Re: CQL - what do people want? (54 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:11:05 -0500
   • Re: CQL - what do people want? (73 lines)
     From: Mark Needleman - DRA <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:17:27 -0600
   • Re: CQL - what do people want? (20 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:52:42 -0500
   • Re: CQL - what do people want? (19 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:09:41 -0500
   • Re: CQL - what do people want? (131 lines)
     From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:37:55 +1100

6. explain
   • explain (28 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:12:05 -0500
   • Re: explain (58 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:28:06 -0500
   • Re: explain (66 lines)
     From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:06:22 +1100
   • Re: explain (105 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:55:15 -0000
   • Re: explain (30 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:57:21 -0000

7. Explain embedded in WSDL
   • Explain embedded in WSDL (16 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:31:05 -0500
   • Re: Explain embedded in WSDL (54 lines)
     From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:20:56 +1100

8. FW: WSDL question
   • FW: WSDL question (90 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 17:02:28 -0500
   • Re: FW: WSDL question (154 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 22:30:43 -0000
   • Re: FW: WSDL question (345 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 23:11:51 -0000

9. issues list
   • issues list (17 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 14:30:57 -0500
   • Re: issues list (38 lines)
     From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:57:03 +1100
   • Re: issues list (43 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:27:54 -0000
   • Re: issues list (58 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 06:55:06 -0500
   • Re: issues list (44 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:58:32 -0000
   • Re: issues list (69 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 08:53:24 -0500
   • Re: issues list (55 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 14:36:29 -0000
   • Re: issues list (32 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:15:20 -0500
   • Re: issues list (24 lines)
     From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:52:16 -0000
   • Re: issues list (43 lines)
     From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 14:11:07 -0500

10. LC's planned SRW/U Implementation
    • LC's planned SRW/U Implementation (29 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:53:01 -0500
    • Re: LC's planned SRW/U Implementation (33 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:37:52 +1100
    • Re: LC's planned SRW/U Implementation (41 lines)
      From: Stevens, Pat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:56:57 -0500
    • Re: LC's planned SRW/U Implementation (19 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:33:46 -0500
    • Re: LC's planned SRW/U Implementation (50 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:25:45 +1100
    • Re: LC's planned SRW/U Implementation (66 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 21:48:06 -0500
    • Re: LC's planned SRW/U Implementation (28 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:25:23 +1100
    • Re: LC's planned SRW/U Implementation (31 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:14:41 -0000
    • Re: LC's planned SRW/U Implementation (38 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:01:49 -0500

11. MODS
    • MODS (232 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:36:02 -0500
    • Re: MODS (37 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:42:03 -0500
    • Re: MODS (20 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:26:43 -0500
    • Re: MODS (31 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:39:19 -0500
    • Re: MODS (26 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:33:47 +1100

12. SRW and OAI
    • Re: SRW and OAI (18 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:44:42 -0500
    • Re: SRW and OAI (33 lines)
      From: Mark Needleman - DRA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:02:48 -0600

13. SRW and OIA
    • SRW and OIA (36 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:06:54 -0500
    • Re: SRW and OIA (51 lines)
      From: Mark Needleman - DRA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:11:13 -0600
    • Re: SRW and OIA (19 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:30:20 -0500
    • Re: SRW and OIA (30 lines)
      From: Mark Needleman - DRA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:34:44 -0600
    • Re: SRW and OIA (42 lines)
      From: Stevens, Pat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:16:09 -0500
    • Re: SRW and OIA (57 lines)
      From: Mark Needleman - DRA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:21:34 -0600
    • Re: SRW and OIA (69 lines)
      From: Stevens, Pat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:49:32 -0500
    • Re: SRW and OIA (82 lines)
      From: Mark Needleman - DRA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:53:48 -0600

14. SRW test server up for playing with
    • SRW test server up for playing with (46 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 19:07:46 +1100
    • Re: SRW test server up for playing with (35 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:55:40 -0000
    • Re: SRW test server up for playing with (28 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:26:22 -0500
    • Re: SRW test server up for playing with (48 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:35:06 -0500
    • Re: SRW test server up for playing with (31 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 11:05:53 +1100
    • Re: SRW test server up for playing with (58 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 11:20:04 +1100
    • Re: SRW test server up for playing with (24 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:00:20 -0000
    • Re: SRW test server up for playing with (49 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:00:21 -0000
    • Re: SRW test server up for playing with (63 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 18:30:26 -0500

15. Time vs. duration
    • Time vs. duration (31 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:24:03 -0500
    • Re: Time vs. duration (34 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:55:56 -0000

16. WSDL Compilation Question
    • WSDL Compilation Question (56 lines)
      From: Ian Ibbotson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:55:00 +0000
    • Re: WSDL Compilation Question (90 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 17:24:17 -0000
    • Re: WSDL Compilation Question (157 lines)
      From: Matthew Dovey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 22:15:09 -0000
    • Re: WSDL Compilation Question (45 lines)
      From: Alan Kent <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:27:46 +1100

17. WSDL Compilation Questions...
    • WSDL Compilation Questions... (68 lines)
      From: Ian Ibbotson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:53:04 +0000

18. ZING meeting during ZIG meeting week
    • ZING meeting during ZIG meeting week (27 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:16:39 -0500
    • Re: ZING meeting during ZIG meeting week (37 lines)
      From: Mark Needleman - DRA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:19:22 -0600
    • Re: ZING meeting during ZIG meeting week (36 lines)
      From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 11:34:14 +0100
    • Re: ZING meeting during ZIG meeting week (37 lines)
      From: LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:11:45 -0500
    • Re: ZING meeting during ZIG meeting week (60 lines)
      From: William Moen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 05:34:16 -0600

19. ZING program at ZIG meeting
    • ZING program at ZIG meeting (19 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:20:14 -0500