MARC Archives – April 2004

1. 506 and 540
   • 506 and 540 (43 lines)
     From: William Schupbach <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 04:43:04 -0400

2. 506/540
   • 506/540 (26 lines)
     From: J. McRee Elrod <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 07:07:46 -0700

3. 546
   • 546 (17 lines)
     From: J. McRee Elrod <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 23:08:49 -0700
   • 546 (42 lines)
     From: Linda Smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 15:25:47 -0400

4. Additions to the MARC Code Lists for Relators, Sources and Description Conventions
   • Additions to the MARC Code Lists for Relators, Sources and Description Conventions (40 lines)
     From: account for net dev and marc <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 17:36:53 -0400
   • Additions to the MARC Code Lists for Relators, Sources and Description Conventions (37 lines)
     From: account for net dev and marc <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:20:56 -0400

5. Additions to the MARC Code Lists for Relators, Sources and Desription Conventions
   • Additions to the MARC Code Lists for Relators, Sources and Desription Conventions (36 lines)
     From: DeAnna D. Evans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 16:11:00 -0400

6. Building catalogues
   • Re: Building catalogues (69 lines)
     From: Dragon, Patricia M <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:50:03 -0500
   • Re: Building catalogues (88 lines)
     From: A. Ralph Papakhian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 12:28:03 -0500
   • Re: Building catalogues (97 lines)
     From: Barbara B Tillett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 12:31:22 -0500
   • Re: Building catalogues (40 lines)
     From: Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 15:43:06 -0800
   • Re: Building catalogues (99 lines)
     From: Horn, Marguerite <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 15:25:48 -0500
   • Re: Building catalogues (42 lines)
     From: Hal Cain <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:08:59 +1000
   • Re: Building catalogues (92 lines)
     From: Patricia Scott <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:47:31 +0930
   • Re: Building catalogues (112 lines)
     From: PIEPENBURG SCOTT <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:05:24 -0500
   • Re: Building catalogues (32 lines)
     From: MSHERMAN <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:23:28 -0500
   • Re: Building catalogues (122 lines)
     From: Rob Atkinson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:53:26 -0600
   • Re: Building catalogues (116 lines)
     From: Lowell Ashley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 12:34:18 -0500
   • Re: Building catalogues (34 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 09:21:09 +1000
   • Re: Building catalogues (49 lines)
     From: William Schupbach <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 13:47:35 -0400

7. Direct access updating databases
   • Direct access updating databases (21 lines)
     From: Anne Munkebyaune <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:42:20 +0200
   • Re: Direct access updating databases (31 lines)
     From: Rebecca S. Guenther <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 15:14:27 -0400

8. FRBR Preconference
   • FRBR Preconference (37 lines)
     From: Kate Harcourt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 10:38:59 -0400

9. Keywording authority records (was Building catalogues)
   • Re: Keywording authority records (was Building catalogues) (78 lines)
     From: Miller, David <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:29:34 -0500

10. NISO Metadata Workshop: Early Registration Ends April 15th
    • NISO Metadata Workshop: Early Registration Ends April 15th (50 lines)
      From: Rebecca S. Guenther <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:12:15 -0400

11. Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?)
    • Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?) (126 lines)
      From: Patricia Scott <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:04:48 +0930
    • Re: Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?) (53 lines)
      From: Norma Jessop <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:44:08 +0100
    • Re: Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?) (29 lines)
      From: Mike Tribby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 10:20:46 -0500
    • Re: Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?) (56 lines)
      From: Hal Cain <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:40:12 +1000
    • Re: Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?) (42 lines)
      From: Verna Urbanski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:33:57 -0400
    • Re: Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?) (50 lines)
      From: William W. Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:52:17 -0400
    • Re: Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?) (81 lines)
      From: Mike Tribby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 07:31:28 -0500
    • Re: Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?) (57 lines)
      From: Linda Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:54:34 -0400
    • Re: Revisiting the LC view of Translation note (in 546 or 500?) (45 lines)
      From: Ian Fairclough <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 15:51:36 -0400

12. Translation note in 500 or 546
    • Re: Translation note in 500 or 546 (43 lines)
      From: Gordon Pew <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 09:07:12 -0400

13. Translation note in 546 or 500?
    • Translation note in 546 or 500? (40 lines)
      From: Deborah Fritz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 12:20:59 -0400
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (34 lines)
      From: Jerri Swinehart <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:41 -0400
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (72 lines)
      From: Jimmie Lundgren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:49:24 -0400
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (79 lines)
      From: Randall K Barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:24:13 -0400
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (28 lines)
      From: J. McRee Elrod <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 12:27:06 -0700
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (62 lines)
      From: Bill Lehm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:58:51 +0100
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (114 lines)
      From: PHILIP DAVIES <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:50:02 +0100
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (25 lines)
      From: Deborah Fritz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 17:08:38 -0400
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (27 lines)
      From: J. McRee Elrod <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:47:49 -0700
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (65 lines)
      From: Linda Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:13:01 -0400
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (36 lines)
      From: Gordon Pew <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:05:30 -0400
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (92 lines)
      From: Deborah Fritz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:16:49 -0400
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (107 lines)
      From: Linda Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:27:40 -0400
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (121 lines)
      From: Deborah Fritz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:42:50 -0400
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (68 lines)
      From: Dick Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:25:14 -0700
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (137 lines)
      From: Linda Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:50:44 -0400
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (33 lines)
      From: Daniel CannCasciato <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:16:17 -0700
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (44 lines)
      From: Hal Cain <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 23:33:43 +1000
    • Re: Translation note in 546 or 500? (225 lines)
      From: Cauthen, Paul (cauthep) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 16:44:37 -0400

14. Unicode
    • Unicode (26 lines)
      From: docinfo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 19:50:47 +0530
    • Re: Unicode (45 lines)
      From: Stephen Toney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:55:24 -0400
    • Re: Unicode (34 lines)
      From: Nguyen Ngoc Binh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:29:33 +0700