 |
State Standards and Assessment Update
(Jan 08, 2009)
|
| A high-quality standards and assessment system is the cornerstone of a State accountability system; it is necessary to ascertain the extent to which States are achieving the goal of universal proficiency. This is a vital piece of NCLB. Without very clear and challenging content standards, and tests that are aligned to those content standards, we cannot measure the success we are having in helping our nation's children reach grade-level proficiency. |
|
| State Standards and Assessment Update (PDF)
(Jan 08, 2009)
|
| A high-quality standards and assessment system is the cornerstone of a State accountability system; it is necessary to ascertain the extent to which States are achieving the goal of universal proficiency. This is a vital piece of NCLB. Without very clear and challenging content standards, and tests that are aligned to those content standards, we cannot measure the success we are having in helping our nation's children reach grade-level proficiency. (PDF) |
|
| Letters to Chief State School Officers Regarding an Update on Several No Child Left Behind Cornerstones
(Jan 08, 2009)
|
| Access this page to link to available Letters to Chief State School Officers Regarding Cornerstones Under No Child Left Behind. |
|
State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act, Volume VI--Targeting and Uses of Federal Education Funds
(Jan 07, 2009)
|
| This report examines how well federal funds are targeted to districts and schools serving economically disadvantaged students, how Title I targeting has changed over the past seven years, how districts have spent federal funds, and the base of state and local resources to which federal funds are added. |
|
|
State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act, Volume VII--Title I School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services: Final Report
(Jan 07, 2009)
|
| This report provides updated information on the implementation and usage of choice options that are offered to students in Title I schools that have been identified for improvement. |
|
|
State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act, Implementation of the 1 Percent Rule and 2 Percent Interim Policy Options
(Jan 07, 2009)
|
| This report presents findings about the implementation of regulations and guidelines issued under the No Child Left Behind Act that provide flexibility for the treatment of certain students with disabilities in state assessment and accountability systems. |
|
| Performance and Efficiency Measure Results: 2005-06 - Analysis (MS Word)
(Jan 06, 2009)
|
| This page provides a discussion and analysis of grantee performance and efficiency measures results for 2005-06 for the Student Support Services Program. (MS Word) |
|
| Performance and Efficiency Measure Results: 2005-06
(Jan 06, 2009)
|
| This page provides grantee performance and efficiency measures results for 2005-06 for the Student Support Services Program. |
|
| Performance and Efficiency Measure Results: 2005-06 - Analysis (PDF)
(Jan 06, 2009)
|
| This page provides a discussion and analysis of grantee performance and efficiency measures results for 2005-06 for the Student Support Services Program. (PDF) |
|
| Performance -- Student Support Services Program
(Jan 06, 2009)
|
| This page lists annual performance reports, Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) indicators, success stories, promising practices, data analysis, and performance reports for the Student Support Services Program. |
|
