Food and Nutrition Service
HomeAbout SNAP
NewsroomHelpContact USEn Espanol

 

 


  

Search all USDA
Search Tips
Browse by Audience
  


Disaster Assistance
Employment & Training
Grants
Informational Materials
Nutrition Education
Outreach
Program Data
Program Improvement
Program Policy
Quality Control
Research & Reports
Topics A to Z

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Legislative History

  1920s
  Production surpluses aggravated unemployment and lack of consumer buying power.
 
  1933
  Federal Surplus Relief Corporation (FSRC), a non-profit, non-capital corporation, formed to dispense commodities.
 
  1935
  FSRC changed to Food Surplus Commodities Corporation (FSCC) whose focus was on encouraging domestic consumption of surpluses rather than on unemployment. Funding through Section 32 of P.L. 74-320 (Agricultural Adjustment Act) established to encourage agricultural exports, domestic consumption of agricultural commodities, and reestablishment of farmers' purchasing power.
 
  1937
  Commodities purchased for FSCC using Section 32 funds allowed to be donated for relief purposes (P.L. 75-165).
 
  1938
  FSCC distributing $54 million worth of food a year.
 
  1939
  Secretary of Agriculture cites problems with the commodity distribution program.
  May 16: Experimental FSP began in Rochester, N.Y. Program expanded to 1,741 counties and 88 cities by August 1942. Four million people participating by May 1943. Participants spent an amount of money representing estimated normal food expenditures, for orange stamps and were given blue stamps, without cost, to buy designated surplus foods at retail establishments.
 
  1941
  May: Nutrition Council for Defense recommended extending FSP, justifying it as a "vital cog" in the National Defense Plan.
 
  1943
  March: Although half of the counties in the U.S. had a FSP, scandal and rumors of fraud and abuse, together with lower participation than in the direct distribution program, pressure from organized producers who insisted that their products be on the surplus list even if they were not to participants' advantage, decentralized administration with four administrators interpreting policy differently, and the fact that the program was never authorized by Congress, led to the demise of the program. Scarcity of surplus commodities also played a part in termination of the program in the Spring of 1943.
 

Last modified: 11/21/2008