SUBCOOR Archives – July 2006

1. Archie Warnock <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: The proposal passed MARBI! (46 lines)
     Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:08:44 -0400

2. Colleen Cahill <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: The proposal passed MARBI! (52 lines)
     Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 07:53:52 -0400

3. Dean C Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: The proposal passed MARBI! (85 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:20:18 -0400

4. Houghton,Andrew <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: The proposal passed MARBI! (52 lines)
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 09:38:01 -0400

5. Joe Aufmuth <[log in to unmask]>
   • GPS and Authority records -- new coordinate fields thread (183 lines)
     Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:52:14 -0400
   • New thread -- GPS coordinates and place name authorities for new coordinate fields (86 lines)
     Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:20:44 -0400
   • Re: The proposal passed MARBI! (150 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:05:48 -0400
   • Re: The proposal passed MARBI! (118 lines)
     Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 09:42:59 -0400
   • Re: The proposal passed MARBI! (87 lines)
     Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:53:23 -0400

6. Mary Larsgaard <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: coordinates in decimal degrees or in degrees/minutes/seconds (93 lines)
     Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:38:30 -0700
   • Re: elevation in authority records (204 lines)
     Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:25:48 -0700

7. Paige Andrew <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: The proposal passed MARBI! (92 lines)
     Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:48:11 -0400
   • Re: The proposal passed MARBI! (152 lines)
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 09:28:46 -0400

8. Philip Hoehn <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: The proposal passed MARBI! (87 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:40:17 GMT

9. Rebecca S. Guenther <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: The proposal passed MARBI! (77 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:09:16 -0400
   • Re: The proposal passed MARBI! (64 lines)
     Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:41:41 -0400