Home About ATSDR Press Room A-Z Index Glossary Employment Training Contact Us CDC  
ATSDR/DHHS Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Department of Health and Human Services ATSDR en Español

Search:

Section Contents
 
Learning Objectives
Purpose
Factors vs. Etiology
Three Scenarios
Etiologic Diagnosis
Key Points
Progress Check
 
Case Contents
 
Table of Contents
Cover Page
How to Use the Course
Initial Check
Primary Care Clinicians
Affected Organ Systems
Indoor Air Pollution
Other Toxicants
Exposure Components
Exposure Survey
Work History
Environmental History
Other Resources
Summary & Follow-Up
Patient Education
More Information
Posttest
Literature Cited
Exposure History Form
Sample MSDS
 
Case Studies (CSEM)
 
CSEM Home
Continuing Education
Online Registration
 
ATSDR Resources
 
Case Studies (CSEM)
Exposure Pathways
GATHER (GIS)
Health Assessments
Health Statements
Interaction Profiles
Interactive Learning
Managing Incidents
Medical Guidelines
Minimal Risk Levels
Priority List
ToxFAQs™
ToxFAQs™ CABS
Toxicological Profiles
Toxicology Curriculum
 
External Resources
 
CDC
eLCOSH
EPA
Healthfinder®
Medline Plus
NCEH
NIEHS
NIOSH
OSHA
 

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 
Case Studies in Environmental Medicine (CSEM) 

Taking an Exposure History
What Is the Purpose of Taking an Exposure History?


Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this section, you will be able to

  • explain the importance of taking an exposure history.

Purpose

Most environmental and occupational diseases either manifest as common medical problems or have nonspecific symptoms. Yet environmental factors rarely enter into the clinician’s differential diagnosis. As a result, clinicians miss the opportunity to make correct diagnoses that might influence the course of disease in some afflicted individuals (by stopping exposure) and that might prevent disease in others (by avoiding exposure) (Goldman and Peters 1981).

What can a clinician do to improve recognition of disease related to current or past exposures? First, one must be suspicious and think about the possibility of environmental factors of disease. Next, one needs to incorporate an exposure history questionnaire into the practice.

The purpose of this case study is not to demonstrate all exposure possibilities but rather to illustrate the principles and process of investigating the etiology.


Exposure Factors vs. Etiology

The preceding case study describes a patient with angina. He has new, nonspecific symptoms of headache and nausea.

Suppose this patient lived near a hazardous waste site.

  • Would your differential diagnosis change?
  • If the patient refinished furniture as a hobby, would you consider this important?
  • Is there a connection between his headaches and cardiac symptoms?
  • How would you investigate the possible correlation?
  • Could he be exposed to chemicals in his workplace?

Each of these factors could play a role in the etiology of this patient’s illness; each exposure could cause disease.


Three Scenarios

The patient described in the case study—a 52-year-old male with angina—is portrayed in three scenarios throughout this document. An exposure history provides clues that prompt the clinician to investigate the possibility of toxic exposure.

  • Scenario 1: This patient is an accountant who has had the same job and the same residence for many years.
  • Scenario 2: This patient owns a commercial cleaning service and uses cleaning products at various industrial and commercial sites.
  • Scenario 3: This patient is a retired advertising copywriter who lives in the vicinity of an abandoned industrial complex.

Etiologic Diagnosis

Most environmental and occupational diseases either manifest as common medical problems or have nonspecific symptoms (e.g., headache, difficulty concentrating, behavioral problems, rashes, asthma, angina, myalgia, difficulty conceiving, spontaneous abortion) (Amdur MO 1991; Wigle D 2000; Marshall, Weir et al. 2002).

Etiology distinguishes a disorder as an environmental illness.

Unless an exposure history is pursued by the clinician, the etiologic diagnosis might be missed, treatment may be inappropriate, and exposure can continue.


Table 1. Examples of Environmental Causes of Medical Problems (Goldman and Peters 1981)
Symptoms and DiseasesAgentPotential Exposures
Immediate or Short-term Effects

dermatoses (allergic or irritant)

metals (chromium, nickel), fibrous glass, solvents, caustic alkali, soaps

electroplating, metal cleaning, plastics, machining, leather tanning, housekeeping

headache

carbon monoxide, solvents

firefighting, automobile exhaust, wood finishing, dry cleaning

acute psychoses

lead, mercury, carbon disulfide

removing paint from old houses, fungicide, wood preserving, viscose rayon industry

asthma or dry cough

formaldehyde, toluene diisocyanate, animal dander

textiles, plastics, polyurethane kits, lacquer, animal handler

pulmonary edema, pneumonitis

nitrogen oxides, phosgene, halogen gases, cadmium

welding, farming, chemical operations, smelting

cardiac arrhythmias

solvents, fluorocarbons

metal cleaning, solvents use, refrigerator maintenance

angina

carbon monoxide, methylene chloride

car repair, traffic exhaust, foundry, wood finishing

abdominal pain

lead

battery making, enameling, smelting, painting, welding, ceramics, plumbing

hepatitis (may become a long-term effect)

halogenated hydrocarbons (e.g., carbon tetrachloride)

solvents use, lacquer use, hospital workers

Latent or Long-Term Effects

chronic dyspnea, pulmonary fibrosis

asbestos, silica, beryllium, coal, aluminum

mining, insulation, pipefitting, sandblasting, quarrying, metal alloy work, aircraft or electrical parts

chronic bronchitis, emphysema

cotton dust, cadmium, coal dust, organic solvents, cigarettes

textile industry, battery production, soldering, mining, solvent use

lung cancer

asbestos, arsenic, nickel, uranium, coke-oven emissions

insulation, pipefitting, smelting, coke-ovens, shipyard workers, nickel refining, uranium mining

bladder cancer

β-naphthylamine, benzidine dyes

dye industry, leather, rubber-workers, chemists

peripheral neuropathy

lead, arsenic, hexane, methyl butyl ketone, acrylamide

battery production, plumbing, smelting, painting, shoemaking, solvent use, insecticides

behavioral changes

lead, carbon disulfide, solvents, mercury, manganese

battery makers, smelting, viscose rayon industry, degreasing, manufacture/repair of scientific instruments, dental amalgam workers

extrapyramidal syndrome

carbon disulfide, manganese

viscose rayon industry, steel production, battery production, foundry

aplastic anemia, leukemia

benzene, ionizing radiation

chemists, furniture refinishing, cleaning, degreasing, radiation workers


Key Points

  • Unless an exposure history is pursued by the clinician, the etiologic diagnosis might be missed, treatment may be inappropriate, and exposure can continue.

Progress Check

1.Which of the following statements about benefits of taking an exposure history are true?
A.make more accurate diagnoses
B.prevent the development or exacerbation of environment-related disease
C.stimulate workplace evaluations and the protection of fellow workers
D. All of the above.

Answer:

To review relevant content, see Etiologic Diagnosis in this section.


Previous Section

Next Section

Revised 2008-05-12.