 
|
Executive Summary: The purpose of this program announcement is to award a cooperative agreement to establish a National Quality Improvement Center (QIC) on Preventing the Abuse and Neglect of Infants and Young Children. The QIC will work to improve the social, physical, behavioral, cognitive, and emotional well-being of children zero to five years old, and their families, who are at risk of abuse and neglect, including those infants and young children impacted by substance abuse and/or HIV/AIDS, by fostering collaborative research and demonstration projects across the child abuse prevention, child welfare, early childhood, and other health, education, and social service systems. I. FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION Legislative Authority The legislative authority is: Section 105 of The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, as amended (42 United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 5106); and Public Law 100-505, "the Abandoned Infants Assistance Act of 1988," as amended. Funding Opportunity Description Purpose The purpose of this program announcement is to award a cooperative agreement to establish a National Quality Improvement Center (QIC) on Preventing the Abuse and Neglect of Infants and Young Children. The QIC will work to improve the social, physical, behavioral, cognitive, and emotional well-being of children zero to five years old, and their families, who are at risk of abuse and neglect, including those infants and young children impacted by substance abuse and/or HIV/AIDS, by fostering collaborative research and demonstration projects across the child abuse prevention, child welfare, early childhood, and other health, education, and social service systems. The overall goals of this project are:
The Quality Improvement Center (QIC) will be tasked with conducting a comprehensive needs assessment and synthesizing the current research and initiatives on the linkages across the early childhood, child maltreatment prevention and child welfare systems. Building on the lessons learned from these activities, the QIC will test and rigorously evaluate evidence-based and evidence-informed models of programs. These models will include cross-agency partnerships that target young children zero to five years old who are at the greatest risk of abuse, neglect, poor developmental outcomes and their caregivers. This target population includes those infants who are unlikely to leave the hospital with their biological parents due to caregivers' substance abuse and/or HIV/AIDS. In addition, the QIC will be charged with building a regional and national learning network of public and private organizations that are also working to address this issue. This will include supporting doctoral students conducting research in this area. The overarching goals of this QIC are to generate and disseminate knowledge on evidence-based and evidence-informed practices and to support the collaborative infrastructure needed at the regional and national level to address the social, physical, cognitive, emotional, behavioral and developmental needs of young children zero to five years old and their families in order to prevent abandonment and/or child maltreatment and strengthen family functioning for vulnerable infants to prevent entry into the foster care system. The QIC will be awarded funds for a planning phase and, pending successful completion of that phase, an implementation phase. During the planning phase, the QIC will engage in a collaborative process to review the literature, clarify the focus, and refine the implementation plan for the remainder of its knowledge-building activities. During the implementation phase, the QIC will sponsor, monitor, and be responsible for a cross-site evaluation of research or demonstration projects at multiple sites. These projects will test a variety of models or hypotheses related to improving the social, physical, cognitive, and emotional well-being of children zero to five years old and their families who are at risk of abuse and neglect. The QIC will also provide two-year dissertation support for up to four doctoral students conducting research on this topic during the life of this cooperative agreement. The QIC will also provide technical assistance to the projects supported under this initiative. Background Over the last decade, research in the neurobiological, behavioral and social sciences point to the critical importance of early life and early childhood experiences in shaping the developmental outcomes for children in later life. These issues were brought to the forefront in the book, From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development (Shonkoff & Phillips (Eds.), 2000). The report emphasized that "early environments matter and nurturing relationships are essential" (p. 4). It further states that, "virtually every aspect of early human development, from the brain's evolving circuitry to the child's capacity for empathy, is affected by the environments and experiences that are encountered in a cumulative fashion, beginning early in the prenatal period and extending throughout the early childhood years," (p.6). These early years are critical because this is the period of the most rapid development in the areas of brain development, physical growth, motor skills, language formation, emerging self-concept, and social and behavior skills. Research suggests that exceptionally stressful experiences early in life may have long-term consequences for a child's learning, behavior, and both physical and mental health. Researchers differentiate among the different types of stress that may have positive or negative effects on a child's development. "Positive stress" in a child's life - overcoming the challenges and frustrations of learning a new, difficult task, for instance - can be beneficial. However, severe, uncontrollable, chronic adversity - defined as "toxic stress" - can result in detrimental effects on developing brain architecture as well as on the other systems that help an individual adapt to stressful events (Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University, 2007, see www.developingchild.net/pubs/wp/excessive_stress.pdf). These negative outcomes are also confirmed by the findings from the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study, which reveal a powerful relationship between emotional experiences as children and adult emotional health, physical health, and major causes of mortality in the
Child Maltreatment in Young Children In light of the research on early childhood, infants and young children who are at greatest risk for abuse and neglect are a particularly vulnerable population that need special attention. According to Child Maltreatment, 2006, children ages birth to one year had the highest rates of victimization at 24.4 per 1,000 children of the same age group in the national population. In recent analysis of the child maltreatment data conducted by ACF and CDC, 84% of the victims under one year were less than one week old (Morbidity Mortality and Weekly Report, April 4, 2008). Children one year to three years old had the second highest victimization rate at 14.2 per 1000. Overall, the rate of victimization is inversely related to the age group of the child. More than three-quarters (78 percent) of children who were killed were younger than four years old. Infants and toddlers have been identified as one of the fastest growing groups being served by child welfare and child protective services (Wulcyzn, Barth, Yuan, Jones-Harden, & Landsverk, 2005). A recently completed study on the developmental status and early intervention service needs of maltreated children commissioned by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning, Research and Evaluation at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services also confirms the severity of the issue for this population. The literature review from the study points to the fact that many maltreated infants and young children present with a variety of physical, cognitive, socio-emotional, relational, and psychological difficulties. Studies reviewed found that significant percentages of maltreated children younger than three years old had chronic health problems, growth and fine motor delays, cognitive delays, and speech and language delays. The study does not delineate whether the maltreatment is a precursor to, or a cause of these problems, and although many of these problems have also been identified as risk factors for children living in poverty, the research highlights the fact that the rates for these problems are higher and more severe among maltreated children. In addition, the medical and developmental problems were found to be both outcomes and potential risk factors for maltreatment. That is, other research highlights the fact that children with medical problems and other types of delays are also at increased risk of maltreatment. Unfortunately, exposure to harsh parenting practices and child abuse or neglect during the earliest years hinders the healthy social, cognitive and emotional development of children (Wiggins, Fenichel, & Mann, 2007). In a secondary analysis of the data from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being and the National Early Intervention and Longitudinal Study, researchers found that children birth to three years who have been maltreated are at substantial risk of experiencing developmental delays. Moreover, the study found that the proportion of children with measured delays who had substantiated maltreatment reports did not differ significantly from children who were investigated for maltreatment, but not substantiated. Finally, young children who were maltreated were reported to have high levels of behavior problems as reported by their caregivers (Barth, The Abandoned Infants Assistance Act, as reauthorized by the Keeping Children and Families Safe Act of 2003, also highlights the unique needs of another population of vulnerable infants and young children. Studies have indicated that a number of factors contribute to the inability of some parents to provide adequate care for their infants and young children and that a lack of suitable homes have led to the abandonment of such children in hospitals for extended periods of time. Infants and children with life threatening conditions and other special needs, including those who are infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (commonly know as HIV), those who have acquired immune deficiency syndrome (commonly know as AIDS), and those who have been exposed to dangerous drugs are at the greatest risk for abandonment and abuse or neglect and merit special attention. Early Childhood Interventions and Child Maltreatment Prevention Research on the effectiveness and cost-benefits of early childhood programs has identified several interventions and strategies that can help ameliorate or protect against many of the potential negative risk factors for child maltreatment. Examples of some program models that have undergone rigorous evaluations include home visiting, parent education, and early childhood center-based programs. The cumulative evidence from a number of early childhood programs suggests that demonstrated effective programs share some of these common characteristics:
(Wiggins et al, 2007; Wulczyn et al, 2005; Schatz, J.N., 2006; Daro & McCurdy, 2007; Schorr & Marchand, 2007). However, identifying evidence-based programs is only the first step in meeting the needs of young children and their families. A recent synthesis of implementation research points to six key factors that can contribute to the successful implementation of evidence-based programs:
(National Implementation Research Network, 2005, see: http://nirn.fmhi.usf.edu/ ) As a group, families of children that come in contact with the child welfare system often present more complex problems that include mental health, substance abuse, family violence and more often come from low-income families where poverty is a significant risk factor for other negative outcomes. Effective child maltreatment prevention efforts will need to target the multiple needs of infants, young children and their families; and will need to intervene at multiple levels: individual, family, community, and societal. Federal and Non-Federal Early Childhood Systems Efforts At the Federal level, a number of interagency efforts to foster greater linkages across early childhood and child welfare have occurred over the last several years. The Early Head Start/Child Welfare Services initiative was established through a partnership between the Office of Head Start and the Children's Bureau (CB), with a goal to expand the service network in local communities to meet the needs of this unique population. In Fiscal Year 2002, grants were awarded to fund 24 demonstration projects for a period of three years. Lessons learned from these projects will be available soon. Since the 1980s, the Office on Child Abuse and Neglect (OCAN) at CB has been leading the In the last few years, a number of non-Federal early childhood initiatives have been proliferating across the country with support from State, local, business and foundation funding. For example, the Center for the Study of Social Policy has launched its Strengthening Families Through Early Care and Education initiative, which strives to support State efforts to build the capacity of early childhood programs to increase protective factors in families to prevent child abuse and neglect. There are other early childhood efforts underway that have been focused on improving the school readiness of young children. The National Governor's The most effective way to meet the challenge of preventing child abuse and neglect is for all child abuse prevention and treatment programs, public and private, to work together in partnership with families and other disciplines such as social services, health and mental health, child care, early childhood, education, delinquency prevention, law enforcement and other advocacy groups in the community to achieve their common goals. Selected Resources Invest in Kids Working Group http://www.ced.org/projects/kids.php Early Childhood Interventions: Proven Results, Future Promise http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG341/ The Science of Early Childhood Development: Closing the Gap between What We Know and What We Do (update on the work from Neurons to Neighborhoods book) http://www.developingchild.net/pubs/pubs.html Wulcyzn, F., Barth, R.P., Yuan, Y.T., Jones Harden, B., & Landsverk, J. (2005). Beyond Common Sense: Child Welfare, Child Well-Being, and the Evidence for Policy Reform. Cost Effective Investments in Children (Brookings Institution report) http://www.brookings.edu/views/papers/200701isaacs.htm Center for the Study of Social Policy/ Strengthening Families Through Early Care and Education http://www.strengtheningfamilies.net Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems Grants funded by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau National Abandoned Early Head Start/ Birth to Five Policy http://birthtofivepolicy.org/index.php CB's mission of child safety, permanency, and well-being of children and families requires that it test new and promising collaborative approaches to supporting children and families. Child maltreatment prevention is a critical strategy that must be included in any effort to improve outcomes for children and families. A significant body of research provides compelling evidence about the need to intervene as early as possible in the child's life. Thus, CB wants to answer questions about improving child welfare outcomes by preventing the abuse and neglect of infants and young children, strengthening family functioning of infants living in families impacted by substance abuse and/or HIV/AIDS, and promoting the safety, permanency and well-being of children and families. In order to do this, CB will establish a National Quality Improvement Center (QIC) on Preventing the Abuse and Neglect of Infants and Young Children, which will develop and disseminate knowledge about what works. The QIC will explore a broad range of questions and issues about how to improve developmental outcomes for infants and young children, what kind of collaborations and systems are effective, how these efforts can result in better outcomes for infants and young children, ages zero to five, and their families at greatest risk for child maltreatment, and how to achieve better outcomes for infants impacted by substance abuse and/or HIV/AIDS to ensure appropriate services to strengthen family functioning. Priority will be given to QIC research projects that focus on the topic of abandoned infants and young children who are impacted by HIV/AIDS or another special medical need and/or substance exposed newborns. During the first year planning phase of this project, the grantee will work collaboratively with CB to decide how to address these questions. For example, with help from CB and the National Advisory Committee, the grantee will decide whether to take a broad look at a comprehensive set of questions or a more focused approach; which questions the project will answer during the literature review phase of the QIC project and which questions it will answer through implementation and evaluation of research and demonstration projects and dissertation support; and whether to focus its projects on a single region or take a national approach. In their applications, applicants must describe the process they propose to engage in during the planning year to refine and define the focus of the remainder of the project. Questions of Interest to the Children's Bureau The following list is not intended to be exhaustive, and applicants are encouraged to propose additional questions and justify their relevance. However, questions of interest to CB include, but are not limited to, the following: General What is currently known and what knowledge gaps exist regarding the successful strategies, and promising practices related to preventing the abuse or neglect of infants and young children, zero to five years old, and their families? What is known about the provision of needed services to young children impacted by substance abuse and/or HIV/AIDS?, Target Population What are the specific characteristics of the infants and young children who may be at greatest risk of abuse, neglect or abandonment? Are there differences for children who are at risk by the type of abuse? What are the parent or primary caregiver characteristics (including biological and learned behavior) that are associated with increased risk of abuse or neglect for their infants and young children? What Effective Models of Early Childhood and Child Maltreatment Prevention Programs Already Exist? What are effective screening and referral processes to identify and link infants and young children to the needed social, health, developmental, behavioral, and cognitive services? What are effective strategies for screening for problems associated with maternal depression, other mental health issues, substance abuse or domestic violence issues for parents and caregivers? What are effective strategies for linking families to needed services once the need has been identified? What are effective parent training or family support programs that strive to reduce the impact of toxic stress on infants and young children? How can programs effectively serve the entire family from a developmental perspective? Are there multi-generational programs that provide support and direct services for vulnerable families that have been effective at reducing child maltreatment? How can one best match the level and types of services with the child and family needs? What is the right mix of services and supports that need to be provided? What are effective strategies for engaging and retaining high-risk, multi-problem families with infants and young children in early childhood and child abuse prevention programs? Are there effective prevention models than can impact outcomes at multiple levels (i.e., individual, family, community, societal levels)? Do these models impact rates of child maltreatment? What is known about the cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit of an early childhood program to prevent abuse or neglect? Program Implementation What are the specific components of effective prevention programs for this population? What are the specific characteristics of the staff working in these programs that contribute to the program's effectiveness? What are the critical factors that support or hinder the implementation and replication of evidence-based and evidence-informed child maltreatment prevention programs for infants and young children? What are the factors associated with successful cultural adaptations of existing evidence-based programs that are also able to maintain fidelity to the original model? What are the qualities and characteristics of supervision, quality assurance and management that foster effective program implementation of evidence-based or evidence-informed programs and practices? How can one bring early childhood and child maltreatment programs to scale and how can they be sustained after the grant period ends? What are the factors to consider in multi-site implementation? System Linkages and Collaboration Are there models of effective partnerships across Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Head Start/Early Head Start, child care, child welfare, substance abuse, mental health, maternal and child heath, primary care, education, juvenile justice and other child and family service systems? What are the factors that contribute to this success? Are there effective models of training and collaboration across child abuse prevention/child welfare and Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) providers to facilitate Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) compliance and improve developmental outcomes for children? How do agencies work effectively with community- and faith-based organizations to engage families and serve infants and young children? How can States and counties effectively build cross-agency partnerships and system-linkages to fully address the needs of infants and young children at greatest risk for abuse or neglect? QIC Roles and Responsibilities Because CB's goal in funding this program announcement is to improve the social, physical, behavioral, cognitive, and emotional well-being of children zero to five years old and their families who are at risk of abuse and neglect, including children of substance abusing and/or HIV/AIDS affected parents, the QIC's approach is to foster collaboration and research across the child abuse prevention, child welfare, early childhood, health, social service and other child and family service systems. The QIC will perform the following functions:
It must be emphasized that the QIC will not assume the training, technical assistance (T/TA), and information dissemination functions and responsibilities currently performed by CB's One distinctive function of the QIC is that it will build knowledge in the area of preventing abuse, neglect and strengthening family functioning of infants and young children, including those impacted by substance abuse and/or HIV/AIDS by testing models through supporting selected research and demonstration projects. The QIC will monitor and evaluate these projects and provide technical assistance and support to these projects. The QIC will also support dissertation research on this topic. Research and demonstration projects sponsored by the QIC under this initiative must:
Specific Tasks to be Performed by the QIC during the Planning and Implementation Phases Applicants must submit a design that clearly and concisely describes a strategy for a 12-month planning phase (Phase I) for the development of the QIC. Upon approval of the Phase I plan by the Children's Bureau, a 48-month implementation phase (Phase II) will follow. In Phase II, the QIC will announce, award, monitor, and evaluate 48-month research and demonstration projects. The QIC will also provide technical assistance (using its own resources or through sub-contracts with other technical assistance providers) to projects supported under this initiative, and will announce, award, and support up to four two-year dissertation research awards to advanced level doctoral students conducting research in this area. Applicants are required to support several research and demonstration projects to implement comprehensive models of evidence-based or evidence-informed early childhood and child abuse prevention program, with specific components or strategies that are based on theory, research, or evaluation data. The QIC must cooperate fully with any evaluation requested by CB. The QIC will also be responsible for a cross-site evaluation of the research and demonstration projects it supports. Travel for Conferences and Presentations Within two months after the award of the 12-month planning phase of the cooperative agreement, the project director, evaluator and/or other key staff of the QIC must attend a one-day work planning meeting in Washington, D.C., with the Federal Project Officer and other CB staff for the purpose of discussing details of the project work plan and cooperative agreement. Additionally, 10 months after the award of the 12-month planning phase of the cooperative agreement, the QIC awardee must make an oral presentation to CB staff in The budget for the 12-month planning phase should include funding for these two meetings, as well as funding for two key staff persons to attend CB's annual grantees' meeting, usually held in the spring. In each of the four implementation years, the QIC awardee must send, at a minimum, the project director and the evaluator to the annual grantee meeting. Grant funds should be budgeted for these travel expenses. Plan for Phase I (Planning) Applicants must present a Phase I plan that addresses the components described in the Background section of this announcement including: (1) the proposed membership and composition of the National Advisory Committee for the QIC: (2) an analysis of the current state of research on preventing the abuse or neglect of infants and young children; (3) a feasible and appropriate method for conducting a comprehensive needs assessment; (4) a systematic approach to focusing the research topic and refining the implementation plan; (5) a strategy for developing a comprehensive review of the literature and best practices; (6) an approach and method for the timely development of the Phase II implementation plan; and (7) a preliminary design for the Phase II - Version A implementation plan that presents a clear and comprehensive vision of how the proposed QIC would operate. Although applicants will have considerable flexibility in developing a strategy tailored to the needs and resources they identify in their Year One comprehensive needs assessment, applications for the first year of funding must explain how during Phase I the applicant would:
In developing a strategy for conducting the needs assessment, CB advises applicants to address Office of Management and Budget (OMB) requirements regarding data gathering. Applicants should propose specific methods (e.g., written surveys, questionnaires, conference calls, focus groups, and unstructured telephone or in-person interviews) and realistic timelines for OMB approval.
Where impact evaluations of sponsored demonstrations are included in the project plan, such evaluations must employ an experimental design based on the random assignment of individuals or cases to either a treatment group or a control group. Impact evaluations will compare the experimental and control groups for statistically significant differences on selected outcome measures. The impact evaluation samples must be of sufficient size depending in part on the type of program intervention to be evaluated, as well as the level of services to which the non-treatment control group will be exposed. Cross-site outcome evaluation plans must include a power analysis illustrating minimum detectable impacts estimated to justify the proposed research sample size. CB is particularly interested in QIC and selected project evaluation plans that incorporate a strong focus on the utilization of the research findings in practice throughout the implementation period. Because the QIC initiative is funded through a cooperative agreement, CB must give final approval before implementation of the work plan and evaluation plan. Funding for Phase II is contingent upon such approval Plan for Phase II - Version A: Implementation In Phase I, the QIC must develop and submit a Phase II - Version A implementation plan for announcing, awarding, monitoring and evaluating research and demonstration and dissertation support. This plan must build on knowledge gained from a review of the literature and promising practices in the field, the results from the comprehensive needs assessment, and input from the National Advisory Committee and other sources. Applicants must submit a preliminary design for Phase II - Version A in this application that presents a clear and comprehensive vision of how the proposed QIC would operate. Applicants must describe the approach and processes that it would use to develop the implementation plan and address anticipated logistical and administrative issues. The Phase II - Version A plan is due nine months after the award of the cooperative agreement and must include, among other things, the following components:
Plan for Phase II - Version B: Implementation Ten months after the award of the cooperative agreement, the grantee will make an oral presentation to CB staff in One month after this presentation, the QIC must submit a revised implementation work plan (Plan for Phase II - Version B) incorporating the recommendations of CB staff. CB must review this plan and continued funding is contingent upon CB approval of this plan. Evaluation CB requires an objective evaluation of the project. This evaluation should be designed to collect systematic data to answer, at a minimum, the questions of interest to CB that are listed in this program announcement. The proposed evaluation plan should measure the effects of the implementation of the proposed project on safety, permanency and well-being. Applicants are strongly encouraged to review the data indicators measured in the CFSRs in identifying the outcomes they want to measure. The findings from the evaluation should support evidence-based practice and provide States with examples of strategies that are tied to positive outcomes for children and families. Specifically, the project's evaluation plan should consider using performance indicators that focus on increasing the safety, permanency and well-being of children and families being served by the supported projects. The proposed evaluation plan should yield data that can be compared to, and contrasted with, regional, State and national level CFSR data, as appropriate. Applicants must allocate sufficient funds to conduct a rigorous program evaluation. Funds for program evaluation must appear in the budget and the application must state the percentage of the total budget which will be allocated to program evaluation. Demonstration Projects Activities funded under this program announcement are demonstration projects. At CB, a demonstration project is one that puts into place and tests new, unique, or distinctive approaches for delivering services to a specific population. Demonstration projects may test whether a program or service that has proven successful in one location or setting can work in a different context. Demonstration projects may test a theory, idea, or method that reflects a new and different way of thinking about service delivery. Demonstration projects may be designed to address the needs of a very specific group of clients or focus on one service component available to all clients. The scope of these projects may be broad and comprehensive or narrow and targeted to specific populations. A demonstration project must:
CB will expect grantees to engage in an evaluation of sufficient rigor to demonstrate potential linkages between project activities and improved outcomes. Guided by a logic model for the project, this evaluation will include both process and outcomes evaluation components. The process evaluation will assess the implementation of the project, as well as the linkages between the collaborative partners that will help ensure that identified needs of children and families are met. The outcomes component will use a sufficiently rigorous approach to examine how the approaches used in this demonstration project affect key outcomes of interest. The evidence from the evaluation will support evidence-based practice and provide States with examples of strategies that are tied to positive outcomes for children and families. Project Requirements The acceptance of funds for projects responsive to this announcement will signify the applicant's assurance that it will comply with the following requirements:
II. AWARD INFORMATION
Substantial Involvement with Cooperative Agreement: A cooperative agreement is a specific method of awarding Federal assistance in which substantial Federal involvement is anticipated. A cooperative agreement clearly defines the respective responsibilities of CB and the grantee prior to the award. CB anticipates that agency involvement will produce programmatic benefits to the recipient otherwise unavailable to them for carrying out the project. The involvement and collaboration includes:
Explanation of Other: In the first budget period, the maximum Federal share of each project is not to exceed $1,700,000. For years 2 through 5, the maximum Federal share is not to exceed $2,000,000. The projects awarded will be for a project period of 60 months. The initial award will be for a 12-month budget period. The award of continuation beyond each 12-month budget period will be subject to the availability of funds, satisfactory progress on the part of the awardee, and a determination that continued funding would be in the best interest of the Federal Government. In years two through five the project will allocate at least $1,600,000 to support research and demonstration projects and dissertations. Awards under this announcement are subject to the availability of funds. III. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION 1. Eligible Applicants:
Partnerships are encouraged between organizations with experience and expertise in child welfare, child maltreatment prevention, and early childhood programs, but applications must identify a primary applicant responsible for administering the grant. Faith-based and community organizations that meet the statutory eligibility requirements are eligible to apply under this announcement.Foreign entities are not eligible under this announcement. 2. Cost Sharing or Matching: Yes In year one, the grantee must provide at least 10 percent of the total approved cost of the project for the project. The total project cost is the sum of the Federal and non-Federal share. For example, an applicant requesting $1,700,000 in year one must match a minimum of $188,889 (total project cost = $1,888,889) in year one. The following example shows how to calculate the required 10 percent match amount based on a Federal share of $1,700,000, as is required in year one: $1,700,000 (Federal share) divided by .90 (100% - 10%) equals $1,888,889 (total approved project cost, including match) minus $1,700,000 (Federal share) equals $188,889 (required 10% match) The non-Federal share may be met by cash or in-kind contributions, although applicants are encouraged to meet their match requirements through cash contributions. Grantees will be held accountable for commitments of non-Federal resources even if they exceed the amount of the required match. Failure to provide the required amount will result in the disallowance of Federal funds. A lack of supporting documentation at the time of application will not exclude the application from competitive review. 3. Other: Disqualification Factors Applications with requests that exceed the ceiling on the amount of individual awards referenced in Section II. Award Information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered for funding under this announcement. Any application that fails to satisfy the deadline requirements referenced in Section IV.3., Submission Dates and Times, will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered for funding under this announcement. IV. APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION 1. Address to Request Application Package: ACYF Operations Centerc/o The Dixon Group, Inc. ATTN: Children's Bureau 118 Q St., NE. Washington, DC 20002-2132 Phone: 866-796-1591 Phone 2: or TTY 711 Email: cb@dixongroup.com 2. Content and Form of Application Submission: Each application must contain the following items in the order listed: Application for Federal Assistance. (Standard Form (SF) 424). Follow the instructions that accompany the form. Budget Information. Non-Construction Programs (SF-424A) and Budget Justification. Follow the instructions that accompany the form and those in Section V, Application Review Information. Certifications/Assurances. See Forms, Assurances, and Certifications below. Project Summary/Abstract (one page maximum, double spaced). Clearly mark this page with the applicant name as shown on SF-424, identify the program announcement and the title of the proposed project as shown in on SF-424 and the service area as shown on SF-424. The summary description should not exceed 300 words. Care should be taken to produce a summary/abstract that accurately and concisely reflects the proposed project. It should describe the objectives of the project, the approach to be used, and the results or benefits expected. The Project Description. Applicants should organize their project description in this sequence: 1) Objectives and Need for Assistance; 2) Approach; 3) Evaluation; 4) Organizational Profiles; and 5) Budget and Budget Justification. Indirect Charges. If claiming indirect costs, provide documentation that the applicant currently has an indirect cost-rate approved by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or another cognizant Federal agency. Third Party Agreements. If applicable, include a letter of commitment or Memorandum of Understanding from each partner and/or sub-contractor describing their role, detailing specific project tasks to be performed, and expressing commitment to participate if the proposed project is funded. Note: General letters of support are not required and are not considered under the evaluation criteria. Staff and Position Data. Include job descriptions, and curricula vitae and/or resumes for proposed project staff. Page Limit. The application limit is 75 pages. Pages over this page limit will be removed from the application and will not be reviewed. This page limit does not include standard forms 424, 424A, 424B, certifications, assurances, third party agreements, letters of commitment, job descriptions, resumes and curricula vitae. General Content and Form Information. To be considered for funding, each application must be submitted with the Standard Federal Forms (provided at the end of this announcement or through the electronic links provided) and following the guidance provided. The application must be signed by an individual authorized to act for the applicant agency and to assume responsibility for the obligations imposed by the terms and conditions of the award. The application must be typed, double spaced, printed on only one side, with at least 1-inch margins on each side and 1 inch at the top and bottom, using standard 12-Point fonts (such as Times New Roman or Courier). All pages must be numbered. When spacing, margins, and font instructions are not followed, excess pages will be removed and will not be reviewed. All copies of an application must be submitted in a single package, and a separate package must be submitted for each funding opportunity. The package must be clearly labeled for the specific funding opportunity it is addressing. Because each application will be duplicated, do not use or include separate covers, binders, clips, tabs, plastic inserts, maps, brochures or any other items that cannot be processed easily on a photocopy machine with an automatic feed. Do not bind, clip, staple or fasten in any way separate subsections of the application, including supporting documentation. Use a clip (not a staple) to securely bind the application together. Applicants are advised that the copies of the application submitted, not the original, will be reproduced by the Federal Government for review. Tips for Preparing a Competitive Application. It is essential that applicants read the entire announcement package carefully before preparing an application and include all of the required application forms and attachments. The application must reflect a thorough understanding of and support the purpose and objectives of the applicable legislation. Reviewers expect applicants to understand the goals of the legislation and CB's interest in each topic. A "responsive application" is one that addresses and follows all of the evaluation criteria in ways that demonstrate this understanding. Applications that are considered to be "unresponsive" or do not clearly address the evaluation criteria or program requirements generally receive very low scores and are rarely funded. CB's website (http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/cb) provides a wide range of information and links to other relevant websites. Before preparing an application, applicants can learn more about CB's mission and programs by exploring the website. Organizing the Application. Reviewers will use the specific evaluation criteria in Section V of this funding announcement to review and evaluate each application. The applicant should address each of these specific evaluation criteria in the project description. Applicants should organize their project description in this sequence: 1) Objectives and Need for Assistance; 2) Approach; 3) Evaluation; 4) Organizational Profiles; and 5) Budget and Budget Justification. The applicant must use the same headings as these criteria, so that reviewers can readily find information that directly addresses each of the specific review criteria. Logic Model. A logic model is a tool that presents the conceptual framework for a proposed project and explains the linkages among program elements. While there are many versions of the logic model, they generally summarize the logical connections among the needs that are the focus of the project, project goals and objectives, the target population, project inputs (resources), the proposed activities/processes/outputs directed toward the target population, the expected short- and long-term outcomes the initiative is designed to achieve, and the evaluation plan for measuring the extent to which proposed processes and outcomes actually occur. Information on the development of logic models is available at: http://childwelfare.gov/preventing/developing/toolkit/. Evaluation. Project evaluations are very important. If the applicant does not have the in-house capacity to conduct an objective, comprehensive evaluation of the project, then CB advises that the applicant contract with a third-party evaluator specializing in social science or evaluation, or a university or college, to conduct the evaluation. In either case, it is important that the evaluator has the necessary independence from the project to assure objectivity. A skilled evaluator can help develop a logic model and assist in designing an evaluation strategy that is rigorous and appropriate given the goals and objectives of the proposed project. Additional assistance may be found in a document titled "Program Manager's Guide to Evaluation." A copy of this document can be accessed at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/other_resrch/pm_guide_eval/reports/pmguide/pmguide_toc.html. Protection of Human Subjects. Evaluation plans that include obtaining identifiable private information about clients may involve non-exempt human subjects research and require compliance with the HHS Protection of Human Subjects regulations (45 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 46). Applicants proposing such research are asked to describe: (a) the procedures for protecting the privacy of clients and ensuring the confidentiality of data collected about clients; and (b) the process for obtaining institutional review board (IRB) review of the proposed evaluation plans. While IRB approval is not required at the time of award, applicants proposing non-exempt human subjects research will be required, as a condition of award, to hold a Federal-wide Assurance (FWA) approved by the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) and to provide certification to ACF that an IRB designated under the FWA has reviewed and approved the research prior to enrolling any subjects in the proposed evaluation. Certifications of IRB approval may be submitted to ACF using the form at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/assurance/OF310.rtf. General information about the HHS Protection of Human Subjects regulations can be obtained at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp. Applicants may also contact OHRP by email (ohrp@csophs.dhhs.gov) or by phone (240-453-6900). D-U-N-S Requirement All applicants must have a D&B Data Universal Numbering System (D-U-N-S) number. On June 27, 2003, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) published in the Federal Register a new Federal policy applicable to all Federal grant applicants. The policy requires Federal grant applicants to provide a D-U-N-S number when applying for Federal grants or cooperative agreements on or after October 1, 2003. The D-U-N-S number will be required whether an applicant is submitting a paper application or using the government-wide electronic portal, Grants.gov. A D-U-N-S number will be required for every application for a new award or renewal/continuation of an award, including applications or plans under formula, entitlement, and block grant programs, submitted on or after October 1, 2003. Please ensure that your organization has a D-U-N-S number. You may acquire a D-U-N-S number at no cost by calling the dedicated toll-free D-U-N-S number request line at 1-866-705-5711 or you may request a number on-line at http://www.dnb.com. Proof of Non-Profit Status Non-profit organizations applying for funding are required to submit proof of their non-profit status. Proof of non-profit status is any one of the following:
When applying electronically, we strongly suggest that you attach your proof of non-profit status with your electronic application. Private, non-profit organizations are encouraged to submit with their applications the survey titled "Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants" found under the "Survey" heading at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html. Forms, Assurances, and Certifications The project description should include all the information requirements described in the specific evaluation criteria outlined in this program announcement under Section V. Application Review Information. In addition to the project description, the applicant needs to complete all of the Standard Forms required as part of the application process for awards under this announcement. Applicants seeking financial assistance under this announcement must file the appropriate Standard Forms (SFs) as described in this section. All applicants must submit an SF-424, Application for Federal Assistance. For non-construction programs, applicants must also submit an SF-424A, Budget Information and an SF-424B, Assurances. For construction programs, applicants must also submit SF-424C, Budget Information and SF-424D, Assurances. When required for programs that involve human subjects, the Protection of Human Subjects Assurance Identification/IRB Certification/Declaration of Exemption form must be submitted. All forms may be reproduced for use in submitting applications. Applicants must sign and return the appropriate standard forms with their application. The Protection of Human Subjects Assurance Identification/IRB Certification/Declaration of Exemption (Common Rule) form may be found at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html. Applicants must furnish, prior to award, an executed copy of the Certification Regarding Lobbying. Applicants must sign and return the certification with their application. The Certification Regarding Lobbying may be found at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html. (If any funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan, the applicant shall complete and submit Standard Form (SF)-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.) The Pro-Children Act of 1994, 20 U.S.C. 7183, imposes restrictions on smoking in facilities where federally funded children's services are provided. HHS grants are subject to these requirements only if they meet the Act's specified coverage. The Act specifies that smoking is prohibited in any indoor facility (owned, leased, or contracted for) used for the routine or regular provision of kindergarten, elementary, or secondary education or library services to children under the age of 18. In addition, smoking is prohibited in any indoor facility or portion of a facility (owned, leased, or contracted for) used for the routine or regular provision of federally funded health care, day care, or early childhood development, including Head Start services to children under the age of 18. The statutory prohibition also applies if such facilities are constructed, operated, or maintained with Federal funds. The statute does not apply to children's services provided in private residences, facilities funded solely by Medicare or Medicaid funds, portions of facilities used for inpatient drug or alcohol treatment, or facilities where WIC coupons are redeemed. Failure to comply with the provisions of the law may result in the imposition of a civil monetary penalty of up to $1,000 per violation and/or the imposition of an administrative compliance order on the responsible entity. Additional information may be found in the HHS Grants Policy Statement at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_related.html. Information on the Certification Regarding Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act (PFCRA) may be found in the HHS Grants Policy Statement at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_related.html. Applicants must make the appropriate certification of their compliance with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. By signing and submitting the application, applicants are providing the necessary certification. Where return of a form is required, complete the standard forms and the associated certifications and assurances based on the instructions found on the forms. The forms and certifications may be found at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html. Information on the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a) and the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C 552) or FOIA may be found in the HHS Grants Policy Statement at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html. Private, non-profit organizations are encouraged to submit with their applications the survey titled "Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants" found under the "Survey" heading at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html. Please see Section V.1 for instructions on preparing the full project description. Please reference Section IV.3 for details about acknowledgement of received applications. Electronic SubmissionApplicants to ACF may submit their applications in either electronic or paper format. To submit an application electronically, please use the http://www.Grants.gov site. When using www.Grants.gov, applicants will be able to download a copy of the application package, complete it off-line, and then upload and submit the application via the www.Grants.gov site. ACF will not accept grant applications via facsimile or email. Acceptable electronic formats for the application attachments (narratives, charts, etc.) must use the following standard technologies, i.e., Microsoft (Word and Excel), Word Perfect, Adobe PDF, Jpeg, and Gif. IMPORTANT NOTE: Before submitting an electronic application, applicants must complete the organization registration process as well as obtain and register "electronic signature credentials" for the Authorized Organization Representative (AOR). Since this process may take more than five business days, it is important to start this process early, well in advance of the application deadline. Be sure to complete all www.Grants.gov registration processes listed on the Organization Registration Checklist, which can be found at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/registration_checklist.html. Please note the following if planning to submit an application electronically via www.Grants.gov:
Applicants that are submitting their application in paper format should submit one original and two copies of the complete application. The original and each of the two copies must include all required forms, certifications, assurances, and appendices, be signed by an authorized representative, and be unbound. The original copy of the application must have original signature(s). Non-Federal ReviewersSince ACF will be using non-Federal reviewers in the review process, applicants have the option of omitting from the application copies (not the original) specific salary rates or amounts for individuals specified in the application budget as well as Social Security Numbers, if otherwise required for individuals. The copies may include summary salary information. If applicants are submitting their application electronically, ACF will omit the same specific salary rate information from copies made for use during the review and selection process. 3. Submission Dates and Times: Due Date for Applications: 07/14/2008 Explanation of Due Dates The due date for receipt of applications is referenced above. Applications received after 4:30 p.m., eastern time, on the due date will be classified as late and will not be considered in the current competition. Applicants are responsible for ensuring that applications are mailed or hand-delivered or submitted electronically well in advance of the application due date and time. Applications that are submitted by mail must be received no later than 4:30 p.m., eastern time, on the due date referenced above at the address listed in Section IV.6. Hand Delivery Applications hand carried by applicants, applicant couriers, other representatives of the applicant, or by overnight/express mail couriers must be received on or before the due date referenced above, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., eastern time, at the address referenced in Section IV.6., between Monday and Friday (excluding Federal holidays). Electronic Submission Applications submitted electronically via Grants.gov must be submitted no later than 4:30 p.m., eastern time, on the due date referenced above. ACF cannot accommodate transmission of applications by facsimile or email. Late Applications Applications that do not meet the requirements above are considered late applications. ACF shall notify each late applicant that its application will not be considered in the current competition. ANY APPLICATION RECEIVED AFTER 4:30 P.M., EASTERN TIME, ON THE DUE DATE WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR COMPETITION. Extension of Deadlines ACF may extend application deadlines when circumstances such as acts of God (floods, hurricanes, etc.) occur; when there are widespread disruptions of mail service; or in other rare cases. A determination to extend or waive deadline requirements rests with the Chief Grants Management Officer. Receipt acknowledgement for application packages will not be provided to applicants who submit their package via mail, courier services, or by hand delivery. Applicants will receive an electronic acknowledgement for applications that are submitted via http://www.Grants.gov. Checklist You may use the checklist below as a guide when preparing your application package.
Additional Forms Private, non-profit organizations are encouraged to submit with their applications the survey titled "Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants" found under the "Survey" heading at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html.
4. Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs: State Single Point of Contact (SPOC) This program is covered under Executive Order (Exec. Order) 12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs," and 45 CFR Part 100, "Intergovernmental Review of Department of Health and Human Services Programs and Activities." Under the Exec. Order, States may design their own processes for reviewing and commenting on proposed Federal assistance under covered programs. The official list of the jurisdictions that have elected to participate in Exec. Order 12372, including addresses and contact persons, may be found on the following URL: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/spoc.html. Applicants from participating jurisdictions should contact their SPOC, as soon as possible, to alert them of prospective applications and receive instructions. Applicants must submit all required materials to the SPOC and indicate the date of this submittal (or the date of contact if no submittal is required) on the Standard Form (SF) 424, item 19. Under 45 CFR 100.8(a)(2), a SPOC has 60 days from the application due date to comment on proposed new or competing continuation awards. SPOCs are encouraged to eliminate the submission of routine endorsements as official recommendations. Additionally, SPOCs are requested to clearly differentiate between mere advisory comments and official State process recommendations, which may trigger the "accommodate or explain" rule. Comments submitted directly to ACF should be addressed to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Grants Management, Division of Discretionary Grants, 370 L'Enfant Promenade SW., 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20447. Although some jurisdictions have chosen not to participate in this process, entities that meet the eligibility requirements of the Program Announcement are still eligible to apply for a grant even if a State, Territory, or Commonwealth, etc., does not have a SPOC. Therefore, applicants from these jurisdictions, or for projects administered by Federally-recognized Indian Tribes, need take no action in regard to Exec. Order 12372. 5. Funding Restrictions: Costs of organized fund raising, including financial campaigns, endowment drives, solicitation of gifts and bequests, and similar expenses incurred solely to raise capital or obtain contributions, are unallowable. Grant awards will not allow reimbursement of pre-award costs. Construction and purchase of real property are not allowable activities or expenditures under this grant award. 6. Other Submission Requirements: Please see Sections IV.2 and IV.3 for deadline information and other application requirements. Submit applications to one of the following addresses: Submission by Mail ACYF/ Operations Centerc/o Dixon Group, Inc. ATTN: Children's Bureau 118 Q St., NE. Washington, DC 20002-2132 Hand Delivery ACYF/ Operations Centerc/o Dixon Group, Inc. ATTN: Children's Bureau 118 Q St., NE. Washington, DC 20002-2132 Electronic Submission Please see Section IV.2 for guidelines and requirements when submitting applications electronically via http://www.Grants.gov. V. APPLICATION REVIEW INFORMATION The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (P.L. 104-13) Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 40 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed and reviewing the collection information. The project description is approved under OMB control number 0970-0139, which expires 4/30/2010. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. 1. Criteria: Part I THE PROJECT DESCRIPTION OVERVIEW PURPOSE The project description provides the majority of information by which an application is evaluated and ranked in competition with other applications for available assistance. The project description should be concise and complete. It should address the activity for which Federal funds are being requested. Supporting documents should be included where they can present information clearly and succinctly. In preparing the project description, information that is responsive to each of the requested evaluation criteria must be provided. Awarding offices use this and other information in making their funding recommendations. It is important, therefore, that this information be included in the application in a manner that is clear and complete. GENERAL EXPECTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS ACF is particularly interested in specific project descriptions that focus on outcomes and convey strategies for achieving intended performance. Project descriptions are evaluated on the basis of substance and measurable outcomes, not length. Extensive exhibits are not required. Cross-referencing should be used rather than repetition. Supporting information concerning activities that will not be directly funded by the grant or information that does not directly pertain to an integral part of the grant-funded activity should be placed in an appendix. Part II GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING A FULL PROJECT DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION Applicants that are required to submit a full project description shall prepare the project description statement in accordance with the following instructions while being aware of the specified evaluation criteria. The text options give a broad overview of what the project description should include while the evaluation criteria identify the measures that will be used to evaluate applications. PROJECT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT Provide a summary of the project description (one page or less) with reference to the funding request. OBJECTIVES AND NEED FOR ASSISTANCE Clearly identify the physical, economic, social, financial, institutional, and/or other problem(s) requiring a solution. The need for assistance must be demonstrated and the principal and subordinate objectives of the project must be clearly stated; supporting documentation, such as letters of support and testimonials from concerned interests other than the applicant, may be included. Any relevant data based on planning studies should be included or referred to in the endnotes/footnotes. Incorporate demographic data and participant/beneficiary information, as needed. In developing the project description, the applicant may volunteer or be requested to provide information on the total range of projects currently being conducted and supported (or to be initiated), some of which may be outside the scope of the program announcement. APPROACH Outline a plan of action that describes the scope and detail of how the proposed work will be accomplished. Account for all functions or activities identified in the application. Cite factors that might accelerate or decelerate the work and state your reason for taking the proposed approach rather than others. Describe any unusual features of the project such as design or technological innovations, reductions in cost or time, or extraordinary social and community involvement. Provide quantitative monthly or quarterly projections of the accomplishments to be achieved for each function or activity in such terms as the number of people to be served and the number of activities accomplished. When accomplishments cannot be quantified by activity or function, list them in chronological order to show the schedule of accomplishments and their target dates. If any data is to be collected, maintained, and/or disseminated, clearance may be required from OMB. This clearance pertains to any "collection of information that is conducted or sponsored by ACF." Provide a list of organizations, cooperating entities, consultants, or other key individuals who will work on the project along with a short description of the nature of their effort or contribution. EVALUATION Provide a narrative addressing how the conduct of the project and the results of the project will be evaluated. In addressing the evaluation of results, state how you will determine the extent to which the project has achieved its stated objectives and the extent to which the accomplishment of objectives can be attributed to the project. Discuss the criteria to be used to evaluate results, and explain the methodology that will be used to determine if the needs identified and discussed are being met and if the project results and benefits are being achieved. With respect to the conduct of the project, define the procedures to be employed to determine whether the project is being conducted in a manner consistent with the work plan presented and discuss the impact of the project's various activities that address the project's effectiveness. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION Describe the precise location of the project and boundaries of the area to be served by the proposed project. Maps or other graphic aids may be attached. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The following are requests for additional information that must be included in the application:
BUDGET AND BUDGET JUSTIFICATION Provide a budget with line-item detail and detailed calculations for each budget object class identified on the Budget Information Form (SF-424A or SF-424C). Detailed calculations must include estimation methods, quantities, unit costs, and other similar quantitative detail sufficient for the calculation to be duplicated. If matching is a requirement, include a breakout by the funding sources identified in Block 15 of the SF-424. Provide a narrative budget justification that describes how the categorical costs are derived. Discuss the necessity, reasonableness, and allocation of the proposed costs.
TOTAL DIRECT CHARGES, TOTAL INDIRECT CHARGES, TOTAL PROJECT COSTS EVALUATION CRITERIA: In considering how applicants will carry out the responsibilities addressed under this announcement, competing applications for financial assistance will be reviewed and evaluated against the following criteria: OBJECTIVES AND NEED FOR ASSISTANCE - 20 points In reviewing the objectives and need for assistance, reviewers will consider the extent to which:
APPROACH - 35 points In reviewing the approach, reviewers will consider the extent to which:
The design and strategies demonstrate an understanding of the existing knowledge base on the effective programs and practices for working with infants and young children and their families.
EVALUATION - 20 points In reviewing the evaluation plan, reviewers will consider the extent to which:
ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILES - 20 points In reviewing the organizational profiles, reviewers will consider the extent to which:
BUDGET AND BUDGET JUSTIFICATION - 5 points In reviewing the budget and budget justification, reviewers will consider the extent to which:
2. Review and Selection Process: No grant award will be made under this announcement on the basis of an incomplete application. Initial ACF Screening: Each application will be screened to determine whether it was received by the closing date and time and whether the requested amount exceeds the stated ceiling. Late applications or those exceeding the funding limit will be returned to the applicants with a notation that they were unacceptable and will not be reviewed. A panel of at least three reviewers (primarily experts from outside the Federal Government) will use the evaluation criteria described in this announcement to evaluate each application. The reviewers will determine the strengths and weaknesses of each application, provide comments about the strengths and weaknesses, and give each application a numerical score. The results of the competitive review are a primary factor in making funding decisions. In addition, Federal staff conducts administrative reviews of the applications and, in light of the results of the competitive review, will recommend applications for funding to the Administration on Children, Youth and Families (ACYF) Commissioner. ACYF reserves the option of discussing applications with other funding sources when this is in the best interest of the Federal Government. ACYF may also solicit and consider comments from ACF Regional Office staff in making funding decisions. ACYF may take into consideration the involvement (financial and/or programmatic) of the private sector, national, or State or community foundations; a favorable balance between Federal and non-Federal funds for the proposed project; or the potential for high benefit from low Federal investment. ACYF may elect not to fund any applicants having known management, fiscal, reporting, programmatic or other problems that make it unlikely that they would be able to provide effective services or effectively complete the proposed activity. With the results of the peer review and the information from Federal staff, the Commissioner of ACYF makes the final funding decisions. The Commissioner may give special consideration to applications proposing services of special interest to the Federal Government and achieving geographic distribution of cooperative agreements. Applications of special interest may include, but are not limited to, applications focusing on underserved or inadequately served clients or service areas and programs addressing diverse ethnic populations. Available Funds. Applicants should note that grants to be awarded under this program announcement are subject to the availability of funds. Approved but Unfunded Applications Applications that are approved but unfunded may be held over for funding in the next funding cycle, pending the availability of funds, for a period not to exceed one year. 3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates: Applications will be reviewed during the Summer 2008. Grant awards will have a start date no later than September 30, 2008. VI. AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION 1. Award Notices: The successful applicants will be notified through the issuance of a Notice of Award (NoA) document that sets forth the amount of funds granted, the terms and conditions of the grant, the effective date of the grant, the budget period for which initial support will be given, the non-Federal share to be provided (if applicable), and the total project period for which support is contemplated. The NoA will be signed by the Grants Officer and transmitted via postal mail. Following the finalization of funding decisions, organizations whose applications will not be funded will be notified by letter, signed by the Program Office head. 2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: Grantees are subject to the requirements in 45 CFR Part 74 (non-governmental) or 45 CFR Part 92 (governmental). Direct Federal grants, sub-award funds, or contracts under this ACF program shall not be used to support inherently religious activities such as religious instruction, worship, or proselytization. Therefore, organizations must take steps to separate, in time or location, their inherently religious activities from the services funded under this program. Regulations pertaining to the Equal Treatment for Faith-Based Organizations, which includes the prohibition against Federal funding of inherently religious activities, can be found at the HHS web site at: http://www.hhs.gov/fbci/waisgate21.pdf. A faith-based organization receiving HHS funds retains its independence from Federal, State, and local governments, and may continue to carry out its mission, including the definition, practice, and expression of its religious beliefs. For example, a faith-based organization may use space in its facilities to provide secular programs or services funded with Federal funds without removing religious art, icons, scriptures, or other religious symbols. In addition, a faith-based organization that receives Federal funds retains its authority over its internal governance, and it may retain religious terms in its organization's name, select its board members on a religious basis, and include religious references in its organization's mission statements and other governing documents in accordance with all program requirements, statutes, and other applicable requirements governing the conduct of HHS funded activities. Faith-based and community organizations may reference the "Guidance to Faith-Based and Community Organizations on Partnering with the Federal Government" at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/fbci/guidance/index.html. HHS Grants Policy Statement The HHS Grants Policy Statement (GPS) is the Department of Health and Human Services new single policy guide for discretionary grants and cooperative agreements. Unlike previous HHS policy documents, the GPS is intended to be shared with and used by grantees. It became effective October 1, 2006 and is applicable to all Operating Divisions (OPDIVS), such as the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), except the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The GPS covers basic grants processes, standard terms and conditions and points of contact as well as important OPDIV-specific requirements. Appendices include a glossary of terms and a list of standard abbreviations for ease of reference. The GPS may be accessed at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_related.html. 3. Reporting Requirements: Grantees will be required to submit program progress and financial reports (SF-269 found at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html) throughout the project period. Program progress and financial reports are due 30 days after the reporting period. Final programmatic and financial reports are due 90 days after the close of the project period. Final reports may be submitted in hard copy to the Grants Management Office Contact listed in Section VII of this announcement. Program Progress Reports: Semi-AnnuallyFinancial Reports: Semi-Annually VII. AGENCY CONTACTS Program Office Contact: Melissa Lim Brodowski Grants Management Office Contact: Lisa Dammar, Grants Officer VIII. OTHER INFORMATION Pre-Application Conference. CB will be sponsoring a pre-application conference for all parties interested in applying for the CAPTA: National Quality Improvement Center on Preventing the Abuse and Neglect of Infants and Young Children. The purpose of the conference is to respond to questions about the program announcement. The pre-application conference for this program announcement will be held on June 5 at 11:00 am ET and will be repeated on June 5 at 4:00 pm ET. The period during which questions will be received as part of the pre-application conference will open on June 5 at 11:00 am ET and will close on June 6 at 5:00 pm ET. A recording and transcript of the applicant conference will be posted at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_cb.html following the conference and at least 30 days prior to the application due date; it will be available until the closing date of the announcement. Information pertaining to this pre-application conference can be found at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/grantreview/ or by contacting the ACYF Operations Center, c/o The Dixon Group, Inc. ATTN: Children's Bureau, 866-796-1591 or TTY 711, cb@dixongroup.com. Additional information about this program and its purpose can be located on the following website: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/ For general information regarding this announcement please contact: ACYF Operations Center Email: cb@dixongroup.com
Posted on May 15, 2008 |
|||
