The National School Lunch Program
Background and Development
By Gordon W. Gunderson
The school lunch program had experienced a
continuous expansion from the time it was given permanent status in 1946
until 1968, growing from 4.5 million children participating in 1946-47
to 18.9 million in 1967-68. During the same period, Federal support in
cash payments climbed from about $60 million to over $160 million
(including reimbursement for “milk only" lunches). The value of donated
commodities increased from $8 million in 1946-47 to nearly $276 million
in 1967-68. In 19467, about 12 percent of all lunches served (including
"milk only" lunches) were provided free or at reduced price.
In 1967-68, the national enrollment in public
and private schools was approximately 50.7 million, according to a
survey of School Food Services in March 1968. About 36.8 million
children, or 73 percent, were enrolled in schools participating in the
National School Lunch Program with an actual average participation in
the program of 18.9 million children, or about 37 percent of the
national enrollment. At the time of the 1968 survey, free or
reduced-price lunches were still being provided for about 12 percent of
the number participating.
Reasons for non-participation in the program
were numerous, but in low-income areas and large urban centers low
participation was particularly evident. Many of the school buildings in
these areas, as well as the small schools in rural areas, were built
many years ago when there were no plans for operating a school lunch
program, and the buildings did not lend themselves to remodeling for
that purpose -neither were local funds available for it. Many of the
elementary school buildings in urban centers were built with the idea
that the children could and should go home for lunch ("neighborhood
schools") and lunchroom facilities were not available. Many of these
condition hold true today.
Some school authorities still cling to the
idea that a school lunch program must be self-supporting, and others
feel that the school has no responsibility in this area. According to a
junior high school principal, "We think this is the responsibility of
parents and child. We do not check them to see if a student eats. As a
whole, we are doing it as a service rather than a need."
42 A principal of a low-income elementary schools
says, "I don't believe in free lunches for welfare people . . . It is
not a welfare or educational responsibility. It is the parents'
responsibility.”
43 Another school principal said, "We have a
specific allocation of free lunches. There are always more children to
feed than the funds allow. We have a policy that no child goes hungry.
If they can't get a lunch, then they get milk and crackers."
44
The net result is that the children in the
neediest areas must go without an adequate noonday meal at school, or
perhaps an inadequate meal at home, or none at all. Many high school
students prefer to bring a bag lunch from home or eat snacks and
beverages at a nearby stand or from a vending machine in the school. In
some instances the portions served to high school students are not
adjusted to meet their needs and they seek other sources of service
where their tastes and appetites can be satisfied.
The predominating reason, however, appears to
be inadequate funding at Federal, State and local levels with the end
result that the children who cannot afford to pay are the losers.
The findings of the Committee on School Lunch
Participation published in Their Daily Bread in April 1968, gives stark
evidence of the general treatment of the free or reduced-price provision
of the National School Lunch Act nationally. Contrary to a generally
accepted belief that children participating in a school lunch program
are provided lunches free or at reduced price, if unable to pay, the
committee concluded after extensive national research that: "Of 60
million public elementary and secondary school children, only about
million participate in the National School Lunch Program. Two out of
three do not participate. Of 60-million school children, fewer than two
million, just under 4 percent, are able to get a free or reduced price
school lunch. Whether or not a child is eligible for a free lunch is
determined not by any universally accepted formula, but by local
decisions about administration and financing which may or may not have
anything to do with the need of the individual child. And generally
speaking, the greater the need of children from a poor neighborhood, the
less the community is able to meet it.”
45
National Nutrition Status
Also in April 1968, the Citizens' Board of
Inquiry into Hunger and Malnutrition in the United States publicly
revealed the findings o its nation-wide study, in a paperback book,
Hunger USA. The Board consisted of selected representation from
medicine, law universities, foundations, social action groups, organized
labor, and religion. "We have found concrete evidence of chronic hunger
and malnutrition in every part of the United States where we have held
hearings or conducted field trips, "the Board reported, estimating that
at least 10 million persons were suffering from hunger and malnutrition.
46 The Board also alleged that 280 counties in the
United States were "hunger counties" and were in need of emergency
assistance.
47
A CBS television documentary portraying case
after case of extreme poverty and the need for free or reduced-price
lunches by hungry children, particularly from families living on incomes
at or below poverty level, was shown to television audiences in May,
1968.
There had been a growing public clamor for
more funds and food for needy families and more free school lunches for
needy children for quite some time, and the television documentary plus
the publications, Their Daily Bread and Hunger USA, evoked demands for
action. Public concern rose to an unprecedented height, and so did the
concern and action by Congress and the President. Soon after the report
of the Citizens' Board of Inquiry, the Senate Select Committee on
Nutrition and Human Needs was created for further intensive study, in
addition to the hearings conducted by committees of the House and
Senate.
Action by the President
On May 6, 1969, the President sent a message
to Congres3 outlining the problem facing the Nation and making
recommendations for action by the Congres3 and governmental agencies to
eliminate hunger and malnutrition and insure a healthful diet for all
Americans. The President stated, "So accustomed are most of us to a full
and balanced diet that, until recently, we have thought of hunger and
malnutrition as problems only in far less fortunate counties.
"But in the past few years we have awakened to
the distressing fact that despite our material abundance and
agricultural wealth, many Americans suffer from malnutrition. Precise
factual descriptions of its extent are not presently available, but
there can be no doubt that hunger and malnutrition exist in America, and
that some millions may be affected. For them, there must be first
sufficient food income. But this alone would only begin to address the
problem, for what matters finally is what people buy with the money they
have. People must be educated in the choosing of proper foods. All of
us, poor and non-poor alike, must be reminded that a proper diet is a
basic determinant of good health."
The President went on to state further, "More
is at stake here than the health and well-being of 16 million American
citizens who will be aided by these programs and the current child food
assistance programs. Something very like the honor of American democracy
is at issue.... America has come to the aid of one starving people after
another. But the moment is at hand to put an end to hunger in America
itself for all time. I ask this of a Congress that has already
splendidly demonstrated its own disposition to act. It is a moment to
act with vigor; it is a moment to be recalled with pride."
At the President's direction, the Food and
Nutrition Service was created as a new agency within the Department of
Agriculture exclusively to administer Federal food programs, including
the school lunch program, and other agencies involved were directed to
coordinate their activities with those of the Department of Agriculture.
On December 2, 1969, the President reasserted
the problem as he addressed the opening plenary session of the White
House Conference on Food, Nutrition and Health. He said, "Experts can
argue -and they do- and you will- about the magnitude of the problem;
about how many are hungry, how many malnourished, and how severely they
are malnourished. Precise statistical data remain elusive and often
contradictory. However, Dr. Arnold Schaefer, the man in charge of the
National Nutrition Survey, recently made this cautious but forceful
observation: "We have been alerted by recent studies that our population
who are malnutrition risks is beyond anticipated findings, and also that
in some of our vulnerable population groups -preschool children, the
aged, teen-agers, and the poor -malnutrition is indeed a serious medical
problem.' We can argue its extent. But hunger exists. We can argue its
severity, but malnutrition exists.... In a related matter, we already
are greatly expanding our school lunch programs, with the target of
reaching every needy school child with a free or reduced-cost lunch by
the end of the current fiscal year."
Various panels of the White House Conference
recommended expansion of the school lunch program to the extent that
every schoolchild shall have the lunch available to him, and that every
needy child shall be provided a lunch (and breakfast under certain
circumstances) free or at reduced price when unable to pay the full
price.
42 |
Jean Fairfax, Chairman. Committee on School
Lunch Participation, Their Daily Bread, Atlanta, Ga., McNelley-Rudd
Printing Service, Inc., p. 17. |
43 |
Ibid., p.25 |
44 |
Ibid., p.18 |
45 |
Ibid., p.25 |
46 |
Citizens’ Board of Inquiry, Hunger USA,
Boston Beacon Press 1968, p. 16. |
47 |
Ibid., pp. 38 and 95-96. |
Back to the Top
|