Skip ACF banner and navigation
Department of Health and Human Services logo
Questions?
Privacy
Site Index
Contact Us
 Home| Services|Working with ACF|Policy/Planning|About ACF|ACF News Search
Administration for Children and Families US Department of Health and Human Services
The Office of Child Support EnforcementGiving Hope and Support to America's Children

Child Support Enforcement, FY 2005
Preliminary Report

May 2006

Department of Health and Human Services
Administration for Children and Families
Office of Child Support Enforcement

Table of Contents

Program Highlights

Summary Tables

CSE Nationwide, Regional, and State Box Scores, FY 2005

CSE Program Charts and Graphs, FY 2005

Appendix

OCSE-157 Report
OCSE-34A Report
OCSE-396A Report

OCSE Data Report forms are available on the OCSE web site at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cse/forms/

Program Highlights

The following Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) Preliminary Data Report highlights financial and statistical program achievements for the fiscal year 2005. The information is taken from state-submitted reports on program status sent to OCSE quarterly for financial data and annually for statistical data. The data show more than $23 billion dollars in child support payments were collected, of which about $21 billion went to families. In addition, almost 1.6 million paternities were established and acknowledged; and close to 1.2 million child support orders were established.

Preliminary Data. The Child Support Performance and Incentive Act of 1998 (CSPIA)1 requires that states have complete and reliable data for purposes of computing incentives. Federal auditors begin their review of state data after the mandatory December 31st deadline for data submissions. However, readers should note that no assumption has been made in this report regarding data reliability for each state for fiscal year 2005 as a result of these audits. The numbers are presented as submitted to OCSE.

Caseload. OCSE defines a child support case as a parent (mother, father, or putative father) who is now or eventually may be obligated under law for the support of a child or children receiving services under the title IV-D program.

A current assistance case is one in which the children are: (1) recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) under title IV-A of the Social Security Act or (2) entitled to Foster Care maintenance payments under title IV-E of the Social Security Act. In addition, the children's support rights have been assigned by a caretaker to the state and a referral to the state IV-D agency has been made. A former assistance case is a case in which the children were formerly receiving title IV-A (AFDC or TANF) or title IV-E Foster Care services. A never assistance case is a case in which the children are receiving services under the title IV-D program, but are not currently eligible for and have not previously received assistance under titles IV-A or IV-E of the Social Security Act. This includes cases in which the family is receiving IV-D services as a result of a written application for IV-D services (including cases in which children are receiving state, not title IV-E, foster care services) or a case in which they are Medicaid recipients not receiving additional assistance.

In the Child Support Enforcement program there were 15.9 million cases reported during fiscal year 2005. This represents a slight increase in the caseload since fiscal year 2004. In FY 2005, there were 2.5 million current assistance cases, 7.3 million former assistance cases, and 6.1 million never assistance cases reported (table 2). The increase in the overall caseload was due to a small increase in never assistance families since last year.

Paternities Established. Paternity establishment involves the legal establishment of fatherhood for a child. Paternity can be established by a voluntary acknowledgement signed by both parents as part of an in-hospital or other acknowledgement program. States must have procedures that allow paternity to be established or acknowledged at least up to the child's eighteenth birthday.

In the fiscal year 2005 there were over 680,000 IV-D legal paternity establishments and more than 900,000 in-hospital and other paternities acknowledged (table 2). Paternity was established or acknowledged for over 1.6 million children, a 1.5 percent increase from fiscal year 2004.

Orders Established. There were 1.2 million orders for child support established in fiscal year 2005. Never assistance orders made up 46 percent of the support orders established for fiscal year 2005, current assistance orders accounted for 20 percent, and former assistance accounted for 34 percent (table 2).

Collections. Total child support collections were more than $23 billion for fiscal year 2005 (tables 1 and 3), of which $21 billion went to families. This was a 5.2 percent increase in collections from the previous fiscal year. Child support payments are collected through various methods, such as income withholding, unemployment compensation interception, and state or Federal income tax refund offsets.

Collections per Full-Time Equivalent Staff. There were almost 60,000 FTE staff working in the child support program in the states and jurisdictions in fiscal year 2005 (table 1). Child support collected nationally per full-time equivalent staff (FTE) was over $385,000 in fiscal year 2005.

Expenditures and Incentives. In fiscal year 2005, total administrative expenditures were $5.4 billion, a 0.6 percent increase from fiscal year 2004 (table 1). The Federal share of expenditures was $3.5 billion and the state share was $1.8 billion. The Federal government reimburses states for 66 percent of the majority of allowable expenditures and 90 percent for laboratory paternity costs.2

Estimated incentive payments for fiscal year 2005 are over $365 million. Actual incentives to be earned for fiscal year 2005 is $454 million. Individual state incentive levels will be determined after data reliability audits are completed. (See the appendix for an example of how an incentive payment is determined.)

Collections Due and Distributed. The total amount of current support due for fiscal year 2005 was over $29 billion (table 5). About $17.4 billion, or 60 percent, of that amount was collected and distributed (table 5). The total amount of arrearages reported for all previous fiscal years was $107 billion (table 5), and over $7 billion was collected and distributed (table 5). There were 11.1 million cases with arrears due in fiscal year 2005 and 6.6 million of these cases had collections (table 6). Hence, 60 percent of obligors owing arrears made some payment toward their arrears in fiscal year 2005. In addition, there were $1.4 billion in interstate collections forwarded to other states in that year (table 7).

Other Statistics. In fiscal year 2005, program increases were noted for total cases in which a collection was made. At 8.3 million cases, this is a 2.1 percent increase over the number of paying cases for fiscal year 2004 (table 4).

There were 12.0 million cases with an order established in fiscal year 2005. This is a 2.1 percent increase over the number of cases with orders reported in the previous fiscal year (table 2).

The total number of children in CSE cases totaled almost 17.2 million in fiscal year 2005. This represents a slight decrease from the 17.3 million reported for fiscal year 2004 (table 2).

Cost-effectiveness represents the amount of child support collected for every $1.00 expended on the program. The CSPIA cost-effectiveness ratio was $4.583 for fiscal year 2005 (table 10).

The attached charts and tables provide further details on collections, expenditures, caseload, paternities, orders established, and other program statistics such as tribal child support tables for fiscal year 2005. In some cases, current achievements are compared with those of previous years. In addition, new tribal tables have been provided which show achievements in the tribal child support program for fiscal years 2003-2005. Overall, these charts and tables reveal steady progress in program performance.

Summary Tables

Tribal Tables

CSE Nationwide, Regional, and State Box Scores, FY 2005

NATIONWIDE  % change from FY 2004
Collections Distributed $23,005,880,131 5.2%
- Current Assistance $1,042,750,508 -1.8%
- Former Assistance $9,253,966,954 4.3%
- Never Assistance $10,445,124,504 4.1%
- Medicaid Assistance $2,264,038,165 19.6%
Total Expenditures $5,352,566,340 0.6%
Cost Effectiveness ($ Change) $4.58 $0.19
Paternities & Acknowledgements 1,629,971 1.5%
Orders Established 1,180,238 -0.1%
Full Time Equivalent Staff 59,678 -1.1%
Total Caseload 15,860,753 0.0%
- Current Assistance 2,495,817 -5.0%
- Former Assistance 7,292,828 0.2%
- Never Assistance 6,072,108 2.1%

CSE Program Charts and Graphs, FY 2005

Cases
Figure 1 Total Caseload for Five Fiscal Years
Figure 2 IV-D Cases With and Without Orders Established for Five Fiscal Years
Figure 3 Number of IV-D Cases for Which a Collection Was Made for Five Fiscal Years

Paternities Acknowledged
Figure 4 IV-D and Statewide Paternities Established or Acknowledged for Five Fiscal Years

Collections
Figure 5 Total Distributed Collections by Current, Former, Never, and Medicaid Cases, FY 2005
Figure 6 Distribution of Total Collections, FY 2005
Figure 7 Total Collections Received by Method of Collections, FY 2005
Figure 8 Total Distributed Collections by TANF/Foster Care and Non-TANF Collections for Five Fiscal Years
Figure 9 Interstate Collections for Five Fiscal Years

Interstate
Figure 10 Interstate Cases: Cases Sent to and Received from Another State for Five Fiscal Years

Expenditures
Figure 11 Total Expenditures for Five Fiscal Years
Figure 12 Total ADP Expenditures for Five Fiscal Years Number of Children
Figure 13 Number of Children in the IV-D Program for Five Fiscal Years

Figure 1: Total Caseload for Five Fiscal Years

graphic

After decreasing between 2001 and 2004, the child support caseload increased slightly between 2004 and 2005.

Figure 2: IV-D Cases With and Without Orders Established for Five Fiscal Years

graphic

The number of child support cases with support orders rose to 12.0 million in FY 2005. Cases without orders have decreased every year since FY 2001.

Figure 3: Number of IV-D Cases for Which a Collection Was Made for Five Fiscal Years

graphic

The number of cases with collections have increased each year since FY 2001.

Figure 4: IV-D and Statewide Paternities Established or Acknowledged for Five Fiscal Years
(Includes in-hospital and other paternities acknowledged. State paternity acknowledgements include an unknown number of acknowledgements for children in the IV-D caseload.)

graphic

Over a million and a half paternities are established each year; mostly through acknowledgement programs.

Figure 5: Total Distributed Collections by Current, Former, Never, and Medicaid Cases, FY 2005

graphic

Over eighty-five percent of child support collections went to former and never assistance families in FY 2005.

Figure 6: Distribution of Total Collections, FY 2005

graphic

Almost $21 billion in child support collections were distributed to families in FY 2005.

Figure 7: Total Collections Received by Method of Collections, FY 2005

graphic

Wage withholding continues to be the most effective method for collecting child support.

Figure 8: Total Distributed Collections by TANF/Foster Care and Non-TANF Collections for Five Fiscal Years

graphic

Non-TANF collections have increased by over $4 billion since FY 2001; TANF/FC collections have decreased, reflecting the decrease in the TANF/FC caseload.

Figure 9: Interstate Collections for Five Fiscal Years

graphic

Interstate collections increased by almost $232 million over a five year period.

Figure 10: Interstate Cases: Cases Sent to and Received from Another State for Five Fiscal Years

graphic

States sent over one million cases to another state in FY 2005.

Figure 11: Total Expenditures for Five Fiscal Years

graphic

Total administrative expenditures amounted to $5.4 billion in FY 2005, up only 0.6 percent over FY 2004.

Figure 12: Total ADP Expenditures for Five Fiscal Years Number of Children

graphic

Automated Data Processing (ADP) expenditures are down 48 percent from FY 2001.

Figure 13: Number of Children in the IV-D Program for Five Fiscal Years
(Includes children 18 years of age and under.)

graphic

The number of children in the child support program has declined by 1.7 million over the last five fiscal years.

Appendix

CSPIA INCENTIVE MEASURE FORMULAS

INCENTIVE MEASURE

FORM AND LINE NUMBERS

PATERNITY ESTABLISHMENT PERCENTAGE (PEP): IV-D

Number of Children in the Caseload in the FY or as of the End of the FY Who Were Born Out-of-Wedlock with Paternity Established or Acknowledged
divided by
Number of Children in the Caseload as of the End of the Preceding FY Who Were Born Out-of-Wedlock

OCSE-157, Line 6
divided by
OCSE-157, Line 5 (of the preceding FY)

PATERNITY ESTABLISHMENT PERCENTAGE (PEP): STATEWIDE

Number of Minor Children in the State Born Out-of-Wedlock with Paternity Established or Acknowledged During the FY
divided by
Number of Children in the State Born Out-of-Wedlock During the Preceding FY

OCSE-157, Line 9
divided by
OCSE-157, Line 8 (of the preceding FY)

SUPPORT ORDER ESTABLISHMENT

Number of IV-D Cases with Support Orders
divided by
Number of IV-D Cases

OCSE-157, Line 2
divided by
OCSE-157, Line 1

CURRENT COLLECTIONS

Amount Collected for Current Support in IV-D Cases
divided by
Amount Owed for Current Support in IV-D Cases

OCSE-157, Line 25
divided by
OCSE-157, Line 24

ARREARAGE COLLECTIONS

Number of IV-D Cases Paying Toward Arrears
divided by
Number of IV-D Cases with Arrears Due

OCSE-157, Line 29
divided by
OCSE-157, Line 28

COST-EFFECTIVENESS

Total IV-D Dollars Collected
divided by
Total IV-D Dollars Expended

OCSE-34A, Lines 8 + 5 + 13 of column (G)
divided by
OCSE-396A, Line 9 columns (A) + (C)
less Line 1(b) columns (A) + (C)

STATE COLLECTION BASE

2 times (Current Assistance + Former Assistance
Collections + Medicaid Assistance)
+ Never Assistance Collections
+ Fees Retained by Other States

OCSE-34A:
2 times ((Line 5, columns A+B+C+D+E)
+ (Line 8, columns A+B+C+D+E))
+ Line 5, column F + Line 8, column F
+ Line 13, column G

How an Incentive Payment is Determined

Because of the complexity of the incentives formula set forth in section 458 of the Social Security Act, we have included an example of how the system would work in a particular year for State A. Let's make the following assumptions regarding State A (See table A):

    State A's paternity performance level is 93 percent, making its applicable percent 100 percent (see table C)
  • State A's order establishment performance level is 74 percent, making its applicable percent 88 percent (see table C)
  • State A's current support collections performance level is 59 percent, making its applicable percent 69 percent (see table D)
  • State A's arrearage support collections performance level is 60 percent, making its applicable percent 70 percent (see table D)
  • State A's cost-effectiveness ratio is $4.40, making its applicable percent 80 percent (see table E)
  • State A's collections base is $50 million (determined by 2 times the collections for Current Assistance, Former Assistance, and Medicaid Never Assistance plus Never Assistance collections and fees retained by other states)
  • The maximum incentive for State A is:

    • $50 million collections base for paternity ($50 mil. times 1.00), plus
    • $44 million collections base for orders ($50 mil. times 0.88), plus
    • $34.5 million collections base for current collections ($50 mil. times 0.69), plus
    • $26.25 million collections base for arrearage collections ($50 mil. times 0.754 times 0.70) plus
    • $30.0 million collections base for cost-effectiveness ($50 million times 0.755 times 0.80) equals
    • Resulting in a maximum incentive base amount of $184.75 million for State A.

Table A

Measure

State A's Performance Level

Applicable Percent based on Performance

Weight

State A's Collection Base (assumed to be $50,000,000)

Paternity Establishment

93%

100%

1.00

$50,000,000

Order Establishment

74%

88%

1.00

$44,000,000

Current Collections

59%

69%

1.00

$34,500,000

Arrearage Collections

60%

70%

0.75

$26,250,000

Cost-Effectiveness

$4.40

80%

0.75

$30,000,000

State A's Maximum Incentive Base Amount

     

$184,750,000

  • We must now make some assumptions regarding the other States. Let's assume that there are only two other States in our country--and the maximum incentive base amount is $84 million for State B and $50 million for State C, making the total maximum incentive base amount $318.75 million for all three States (See table B).
  • We must now determine what is State A's share of the $318.75 million. It is 58 percent ($184.75 divided by $318.75).

Table B

State

Maximum Incentive Base Amounts

State's Share of $318,750,000

Incentive Payment Pool $461,000,000

A

$184,750,000

0.58

$267,199,216

B

$84,000,000

0.26

$121,487,059

C

$50,000,000

0.16

$72,313,725

Totals

$318,750,000

1.00

$461,000,000

  • Let us assume it is FY 2003, so the incentive payment pool for the FY is $461 million (see table F).
  • Since State A's share is 0.58, this state has earned 58 percent of the $461 million incentive payment pool that Congress is allowing, or $267.2 million ($461 mil. x 0.58) incentive payment for this particular fiscal year.

Table C6

If the Paternity Establishment or Support Order Performance Level Is:

At Least:

But Less Than:

The Applicable Percentage Is:

At Least:

But Less Than:

The Applicable Percentage Is:

80%

 

100%

64%

65%

74%

79%

80%

98%

63%

64%

73%

78%

79%

96%

62%

63%

72%

77%

78%

94%

61%

62%

71%

76%

77%

92%

60%

61%

70%

75%

76%

90%

59%

60%

69%

74%

75%

88%

58%

59%

68%

73%

74%

86%

57%

58%

67%

72%

73%

84%

56%

57%

66%

71%

72%

82%

55%

56%

65%

70%

71%

80%

54%

55%

64%

69%

70%

79%

53%

54%

63%

68%

69%

78%

52%

53%

62%

67%

68%

77%

51%

52%

61%

66%

67%

76%

50%

51%

60%

65%

66%

75%

0%

50%

0%

Table D7

If the Current Collections or Arrearage Collections Performance Level Is:

At Least:

But Less Than:

The Applicable Percentage Is:

At Least:

But Less Than:

The Applicable Percentage Is:

80%

 

100%

59%

60%

69%

79%

80%

98%

58%

59%

68%

78%

79%

96%

57%

58%

67%

77%

78%

94%

56%

57%

66%

76%

77%

92%

55%

56%

65%

75%

76%

90%

54%

55%

64%

74%

75%

88%

53%

54%

63%

73%

74%

86%

52%

53%

62%

72%

73%

84%

51%

52%

61%

71%

72%

82%

50%

51%

60%

70%

71%

80%

49%

50%

59%

69%

70%

79%

48%

49%

58%

68%

69%

78%

47%

48%

57%

67%

68%

77%

46%

47%

56%

66%

67%

76%

45%

46%

55%

65%

66%

75%

44%

45%

54%

64%

65%

74%

43%

55%

53%

63%

64%

73%

42%

43%

52%

62%

63%

72%

41%

42%

51%

61%

62%

71%

40%

41%

50%

60%

61%

70%

0%

40%

0%

Table E8

If the Cost-Effectiveness Performance Level Is:

At Least:

But Less Than:

The Applicable Percentage Is:

5.00

 

100%

4.50

4.99

90%

4.00

4.50

80%

3.50

4.00

70%

3.00

3.50

60%

2.50

3.00

50%

2.00

2.50

40%

0.00

2.00

0%

Table F

Mandated Incentive Pool Payment, FY 2000-2008

The incentive payment pool is:

  • $422,000,000 for fiscal year 2000
  • $429,000,000 for fiscal year 2001
  • $450,000,000 for fiscal year 2002
  • $461,000,000 for fiscal year 2003
  • $454,000,000 for fiscal year 2004
  • $446,000,000 for fiscal year 2005
  • $458,000,000 for fiscal year 2006
  • $471,000,000 for fiscal year 2007
  • $483,000,000 for fiscal year 2008

For each fiscal year following fiscal year 2008, the incentive payment pool will be multiplied by the percentage increase in the CPI between the two preceding years. For example, for fiscal year 2009, if the CPI increases by one percent between fiscal years 2007 and 2008, then the incentive pool for fiscal year 2009 would be a one percent increase over the $483,000,000 incentive payment pool for fiscal year 2008, or $487,830,000.

1The Child Support Performance and Incentive Act of 1998 (CSPIA) provided for an alternative penalty procedure for states that fail to meet federal child support data processing requirements. In addition, CSPIA reformed federal incentive payments for an effective child support program by requiring a performance-based incentive system.

2OCSE charges an assortment of fees to states in return for services provided to state agencies administering the child support program. These fees reduce the total amount of expenditures that are eligible for FFP. Total expenditures (including state and federal shares) reported are net of these fees.

3See appendix for all the CSPIA performance measurement formulas.

4Because the measure has less weight.

5Because the measure has less weight.

6Use this table to determine the maximum incentive levels for the paternity establishment and support order performance measures.

7Use this table to determine the maximum incentive levels for the current and arrearage support collections performance measures.

8Use this table to determine the maximum incentive level for the cost-effectiveness performance measure.