USGS
South Florida Information Access
SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
publications > papers > chronologic model and transgressive-regressive signatures in the late neogene siliciclastic foundation (long key formation) of the florida keys


Chronologic Model and Transgressive-Regressive Signatures in the Late Neogene Siliciclastic Foundation (Long Key Formation) of the Florida Keys

Laura A. Guertin1, Donald F. McNeill1, Barbara H. Lidz2, and Kevin J. Cunningham1


This article was originally published in the Journal of Sedimentary Research, Vol. 69, No. 3, May, 1999, p. 653-666
Copyright © 1999, SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology)

Abstract

index map showing locations of core holes from the South Florida Drilling Project
Index map showing locations of core holes from the South Florida Drilling Project. This study analyzed Long Key and Carysfort Marina Cores. FGS = Florida Geological Survey; UM = University of Miami; FDT = Florida Department of Transportation. [larger image]

Recent drilling of continuous cores in southernmost Florida has documented a thick unit of upper Neogene siliciclastics subjacent to surficial shallow-water Quaternary carbonates exposed on islands of the Florida Keys. The siliciclastics comprise the Long Key Formation and were identified in two cores collected from the middle and upper Florida Keys. A chronologic model based on new planktic foraminiferal biochronology and strontium-isotope chronology suggests the timing of siliciclastic deposition and provides a basis for regional correlation. The chronologic model, supplemented by vertical trends in quartz grain size, pattern of planktic menardiiform coiling direction, and paleoenvironmental interpretations of benthic foraminiferal assemblages, shows that the Long Key Formation contains three intervals (I-III) of varying thickness, grain-size composition, and paleo-water depth. Interval I is uppermost Miocene. The quartz grains in Interval I fine upward from basal very coarse sand to fine and very fine sand. Benthic foraminifera indicate an upward shift from an outer-shelf to inner-shelf depositional environment. Interval II, deposited during the late early to early late Pliocene, contains reworked upper Miocene siliciclastics and faunas. In the upper Keys, quartz grains in Interval II range from very coarse sand that fines upward to very fine sand and then coarsens to very coarse and medium sand. In situ benthic faunas indicate an upward shift from outer-shelf to innershelf deposition. In the middle Keys, Interval II is different, with the quartz grains ranging primarily from medium to very fine sand. In situ benthic taxa indicate deposition on an inner shelf. In both the middle and upper Keys, the upper Pliocene siliciclastics of Interval III contain quartz grains ranging from very coarse to very fine sands that were deposited on an inner shelf.

A sequence boundary between Interval I and Interval II is suggested by: an abrupt shift in the strontium-isotope chemostratigraphy; coarsening in quartz grain size above the boundary; an abrupt landward shift in depositional facies in the upper Keys core; and a distinct variation in the predominant coiling direction of the menardiiform planktic foraminifera, from fluctuating dextral-sinistral to dextral in the upper Keys core. Successive siliciclastic infilling, likely associated with eustatic sea-level change and current redeposition, formed a foundation for subsequent carbonate deposition. Deep-sea biostratigraphic techniques, integrated with ages derived from strontium-isotope chemostratigraphy, can be successfully applied to coastal-margin sequences, even though a depauperate suite of faunal markers is common.


1Division of Marine Geology and Geophysics, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, Florida 33149, U.S.A.
email: lguertin@mwcgw.mwc.edu
2U.S. Geological Survey, Center for Coastal Geology, 600 4th Street South, St. Petersburg, Florida 33701, U.S.A.


The entire article is available to download as a screen quality PDF (684 KB) or print quality PDF (3.8 MB). PDF files require the FREE Adobe Acrobat Reader ® to be read.



| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/papers/chrono_model/index.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 13 December, 2004 @ 11:34 AM(TJE)