Rec. 2002-3
Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls

• 2002-3 BY YEAR:

No document links for 2009

No document links for 2008

• July 30,  2007, Board letter establishing a 45-day reporting requirement regarding the implementation of Recommendation 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• January 22,  2007, Board letter regarding Board recommendation 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• January 4,  2007, Department letter informing the Board that the Department has completed its actions and commitments in the 2002-3 implementation plan and requesting closure of Board recommendation 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]

• March 29,  2006, Department letter forwarding Change Notice No. 3 to DOE-STD-3009, Preparation Guide for U.S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analyses, completing Deliverable 4.2.2 and Commitment 4.2 in the 2002-3 implementation plan, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• March 16,  2006, Department letter forwarding the complete data packages for all NNSA sites relative to Commitment 4.6.2 in the 2002-3 implementation plan, Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls, which calls for implementation reviews of existing Specific Administrative Controls (SACs) and a report to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• January 27,  2006, Department letter forwarding the report on the Implementation of Specific Administrative Controls under Recommendation 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls.  [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]

• December 13,  2005, Department letter reporting completion of Commitment 4.5 in the 2002-3 implementation plan, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls, which calls for document reviews of Specific Administrative Controls in Documented Safety Analyses at NNSA sites. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• August 1,  2005, Department letter reporting completion of Commitment 4.6.2 in the 2002-3 implementation plan, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls, which requires documentation of completed implementation reviews of existing Specific Administrative Controls (SACs) at defense nuclear facilities. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• July 29,  2005, Department letter reporting completion of EM's portion of Commitment 4.4 in the 2002-3 implementation plan, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls, which calls for the submission of a report on completed training and copies of changes to relevant training plans on DOE Standard 1186-2004, Specific Administrative Controls (SACs). [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• July 28,  2005, Department letter reporting completion of Commitment 4.6 in the 2002-3 implementation plan, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls, which calls for the Office of Environmental Management (EM) to review the field implementation of existing critical administrative controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• July 15,  2005, Department letter providing status of commitments 4.5 and 4.6.2 in the 2002-3 implementation plan, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Control, which calls for document reviews of Specific Administrative Controls (SACs) and implementation reviews of SACs, respectively. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• June 3,  2005, Department letter providing status of Environmental Management actions on Commitment 4.4 in the 2002-3 implementation plan, Requirement for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• May 26,  2005, Department letter reporting completion of Commitment 4.4 in the 2002-3 implementation plan, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls, which requires the submission of a report of completed training and changes to relevant training plans or programs related to DOE-STD-1186-2004, Specific Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• January 3,  2005, Department letter reporting completion of the Office of Environmental Management portion of Commitment 4.5 in implementation plan 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls, which requires a report to the Secretary of Energy on the results of the safety basis document reviews. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]

• November 4,  2004, Department letter providing status of Commitment 4.4 in implementation plan 2002-3, Requirements for Design, Implementation and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• April 5,  2004, Department letter forwarding Los Alamos National Laboratory's schedule to review field implementation of existing critical administrative controls relative to Commitment 4.6 in the 2002-3 implementation plan, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• March 24,  2004, Department letter providing information on technical qualifications and experience of personnel involved in the development of DOE technical standard on administrative controls relative to implementation plan 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• March 9,  2004, Department letter providing status of Los Alamos National Laboratory's portion of commitment 4.6.1 in implementation plan 2002-3, Requirements of the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls, which requires NNSA to review field implementation of existing critical administrative controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• February 5,  2004, Department letter reporting completion of Commitment 4.3 in implementation plan 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls, which requires the development of appropriate training materials for contractor personnel responsible for critical administrative controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• February 3,  2004, Department letter providing status on Commitment 4.6 in implementation plan 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls, which requires NNSA to review field implementation of existing critical administrative controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• February 2,  2004, Department letter providing an interim deliverable on Commitment 4.6 in implementation plan 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls, which requires the Office of Environmental Management to establish schedules to review and verify field implementation of critical administrative controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]

• December 31,  2003, Department letter reporting completion of Commitments 4.2.2 in implementation plan 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls and Commitment 4.1.5 in the Department's Software Quality Assurance Implementation Plan with the submission of the DOE Technical Standard on Specific Administrative Controls and the revised DOE Safety Management Functions, Responsibilities and Authorities Manual (FRAM). [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• December 8,  2003, Board letter regarding expectations for Commitment 4.2.2, interim guidance for administrative controls, in implementation plan 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Impementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• October 29,  2003, Department letter regarding Deliverable 4.2.1 in implementation plan 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• August 25,  2003, Board letter regarding requirements and guidance associated with administrative controls in the defense nuclear complex in relation to the 2002-3 implementation plan, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• July 31,  2003, Department letter forwarding an expanded Requirements and Guidance for the use of administrative controls for specific safety functions relative to the 2002-3 implementation plan, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• July 14,  2003, Board letter acknowledging receipt of an acceptable implementation plan for Board recommendation 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• June 26,  2003, Department letter forwarding implementation plan 2002-3, Requirements for Design, Implementation and Maintenance of Administrative Controls.. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• May 12,  2003, Department letter notifying the Board that the Department needs up to an additional 45 days to transmit the implementation plan for Board recommendation 2002-3,Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]
• February 11,  2003, Federal register publication of the Department's response to recommendation 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF]
• January 31,  2003, Department letter accepting Board recommendation 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]

• December 20,  2002, Federal Register publication of DNFSB Recommendation 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [PDF] [DOC]
• December 11,  2002, Board letter forwarding Recommendation 2002-3, Requirements for the Design, Implementation, and Maintenance of Administrative Controls. [HTML] [PDF] [DOC]