Skip ACF banner and navigation
Department of Health and Human Services logo
Questions?  
Privacy  
Site Index  
Contact Us  
   Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News Search  
Administration for Children and Families US Department of Health and Human Services

Children's Bureau Safety, Permanency, Well-being  Advanced
 Search



Feasibility of Evaluating the State Court Improvement Program

Volume II
Evaluability Assessment Site Visit Summaries
Final Report

September 12, 2003
Table of Contents

Report Contents

Arkansas

I. Attorney Ad Litem Program

A. Standards of Representation and Training for Attorneys Ad Litem(AAL's)
B. AAL Program Logic Model
C. Proposed Evaluation Approach
D. Outstanding Issues
E. Summary and Conclusion

II. Indigent Parent Counsel Program

A. Standards of Representation and Training for Indigent Parent Counsel
B. Indigent Parent Counsel Program Logic Model
C. Evaluation Approach
D. Outstanding Issues
E. Summary and Conclusion
Appendix A. Evaluability Assessment Interview Participants

Connecticut

A. Standards of Representation and Training for Attorneys Ad Litem(AAL's)
B. AAL Program Logic Model
C. Proposed Evaluation Approach
D. Outstanding Issues
E. Summary and Conclusion

Delaware

A. Delaware Systemic Reforms: Implementation History and Context
B. Logic Model
C. Evaluation Approach
D. Outstanding Issues
E. Conlusion and Summary
Appendix A. C. Evaluability Assessment Interview Participants

Kansas

A. Implementation History and Context
B. Intervention Logic Model
C. Proposed Evaluation Approach
D. Outstanding Issues to be Resolved
E. Summary and Conclusion
Appendix A. Evaluability Assessment Interview Participants
Appendix B. A Synopsis of Kansas' Standardized Court Forms
Appendix C. Kansas Code for Care of Children, Filings by District

Michigan

A. Michigan's PPMP: Implementation History and Context
B. The PPMP Logic Model
C. Proposed Evaluation Approach
D. Outstanding Issues
E. Conclusion and Summary
Appendix A. Evaluability Assessment Interview Participants

Oregon

A. Oregon's Dependency Mediation Model
B. Intervention Logic Model
C. Proposed Evaluation Approach
D. Outstanding Issues to Resolve
E. Summary and Conclusion
Appendix A. Flowchart for Mediation
Appendix B. Evaluability Assessment Interview Participants
Appendix C. Juvenile Court Mediation Results

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

I. Philadelphia Court's CIP Reform Process
II. Intervention Logic Model
III. Proposed Evaluation Approach
IV. Outstanding Issues to Resolve
Appendix A. Flowchart for Mediation
Appendix B. Evaluability Assessment Interview Participants
Appendix C. Juvenile Court Mediation Results

Texas

A. Texas Permanency and Cluster Court Model Implementation History and Context
B. Intervention Logic Model
C. Proposed Evaluation Approach
D. Conclusion and Summary
Appendix A. Evaluability Assessment Interview Participants
Appendix B. Timeline of Important Contextual Events in Texas
Appendix C. Average Number of New Cases Per Month

Virginia

A. Virginia's Systemic Court Reforms: Implementation History and Context
B. Evaluation Logic Model
C. Proposed Evaluation Approach
D. Outstanding Issues
E. Conclusion and Summary
Appendix A. Evaluability Assessment Interview Participants