Defense Acquisitions: An Analysis of the Special Operations Command's Management of Weapon System Programs

GAO-07-620 June 28, 2007
Highlights Page (PDF)   Full Report (PDF, 45 pages)   Accessible Text   Recommendations (HTML)

Summary

Special Operations Command's (SOCOM) duties have greatly increased since the attacks of September 11, 2001. Today, Special Operations Forces are at work in Afghanistan and Iraq, and SOCOM has been assigned to lead U.S. efforts in the Global War on Terrorism. SOCOM's acquisitions budget has also greatly increased in this period--more than doubling from $788 million in 2001 to approximately $1.91 billion in 2006. In light of SOCOM's expanded duties, Congress requested that GAO review SOCOM's management of its acquisition programs. GAO's evaluation includes an assessment of: the types of acquisition programs SOCOM has undertaken since 2001 and whether the programs are consistent with its mission; the extent to which SOCOM's programs have progressed as planned; and the challenges SOCOM faces in managing its acquisition programs.

SOCOM has undertaken a diverse set of acquisition programs that are consistent with the command's mission to provide equipment that addresses the unique needs of the Special Operations Forces. SOCOM has committed to spend about $6 billion on these programs. About 88 percent of the programs are relatively small, have short acquisition cycles, and use modified commercial off-the-shelf and nondevelopmental items or modify existing service equipment and assets. SOCOM's acquisition plans--as reflected in its current 5-year plan--continue to focus on relatively small-scale, short-cycle programs with modest development efforts. Overall, SOCOM's acquisition program performance has been mixed. About 60 percent of the acquisition programs SOCOM has undertaken since 2001 have progressed as planned, staying within the original cost and schedule estimates. Included in this grouping are programs that had cost increases because of the need to buy additional quantities of equipment for ongoing combat operations. The other 40 percent of SOCOM's acquisition programs have not progressed as planned and experienced modest to, in a small number of cases, significant cost increases and schedule delays because of a range of technical and programmatic issues. Although fewer in number, the programs that experienced problems comprise about 50 percent of acquisition funding because they tend to be the larger and costlier, platform-based programs that SOCOM is acquiring and those where SOCOM depends on one of the military departments for equipment and program management support. SOCOM faces management and workforce challenges to ensure its acquisition programs are consistently completed on time and within budget. Urgent requirements to support SOCOM's ongoing combat missions have and will continue to challenge SOCOM's ability to balance near- and long- term needs against available funding resources. In addition, SOCOM has difficulty tracking progress on programs where it has delegated management authority to one of the military departments and has not consistently applied a knowledge-based acquisition approach in executing programs, particularly the larger and more complex programs. Furthermore, SOCOM has encountered challenges ensuring it has the workforce size and composition to carry out its acquisition work.



Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Implemented" or "Not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director:
Team:
Phone:
Paul L. Francis
Government Accountability Office: Acquisition and Sourcing Management
(202) 512-2811


Recommendations for Executive Action


Recommendation: To better position SOCOM to achieve the right acquisition program outcomes, the Secretary of Defense should ensure that SOCOM establishes sound business cases for its more complex and military department-managed acquisition programs. Integral to this is applying the elements of a knowledge-based acquisition strategy (That is: programs match requirements with resources.) and having effective agreements in place with the military departments that specify clear roles, responsibilities, and expectations for executing programs.

Agency Affected: Department of Defense

Status: In process

Comments: DOD partially concurred with this recommendation. DOD agreed with the need to update memorandums of agreement between SOCOM and the military departments and apply elements of a knowledge-based acquisition strategy, but only after it is defined by DOD within the 5000 series of documents. SOCOM is taking steps to update memorandums of agreement with the military departments. The Command has drafted an overarching agreement with the Navy and hopes to have agreements signed with all of the services next year. In addition, SOCOM has taken the following steps to strengthen its business cases for acquisition programs: (1) in 2008, the Command initiated a review of its requirements generation process; (2) the Command instituted an agreement with the Navy to provide experienced cost estimators who will develop independent cost estimates for SOCOM programs; and (3)the Command has begun using a Defense Acquisition University tool for calculating technology readiness levels prior to initiating programs.

Recommendation: To better position SOCOM to achieve the right acquisition program outcomes, the Secretary of Defense should ensure that, as SOCOM increases its acquisition workforce, it (1) obtains personnel with the skills and abilities needed for more complex acquisitions, (2) makes sure personnel meet DOD acquisition certification level requirements, and (3) has the ability to make the hiring process as efficient as possible.

Agency Affected: Department of Defense

Status: In process

Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. SOCOM has begun several actions to ensure the size and composition of its workforce is a good match for the acquisition workload undertaken by the Command. For example, the Command has established a more formal screening process to asses the education, training, and experience of applicants being considered for acquisition program management positions. In addition, to provide improved oversight of acquisition certification requirements, SOCOM established a team to develop process maps, templates, and metrics for assessing whether personnel meet certification requirements. Also, SOCOM has established electronic work flow packages for its internal hiring processes that are expected to reduce the amount of days it takes to hire new personnel.

Recommendation: To better position SOCOM to achieve the right acquisition program outcomes, the Secretary of Defense should ensure that SOCOM improves the accuracy, timeliness, and usefulness of its acquisition management information system. To accomplish this, SOCOM should (1) establish enforcement mechanisms to make sure program managers submit updated information on a regular basis and (2) conduct quality checks to make sure the information is reliable.

Agency Affected: Department of Defense

Status: In process

Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation. SOCOM is taking steps to improve its acquisition management information system. The Command has made hardware and software improvements to the system and had program managers update information in the system to ensure the information matched existing programs of record. The Command has also established measures to review the accuracy of the information in the system on a more regular basis, including the use of metrics to track when data have been updated and validated.