« Museum Lighting: How We Do It | Eye Level Home | The Science »

Responsive Architecture
July 28, 2006

Architects' depiction of the proposed Parrish Art Museum. © 2006 Herzog & de Meuron

From the NYT write-up of the new design for the Parrish Art Museum in Long Island:

Typically, architects design museums with the art collection in mind; here, [Swiss architects Jacques Herzog and Pierre de Meuron] also sought to design a museum befitting the artists. The two concepts are in any case intertwined, given that the Parrish’s collection embraces American art from the 19th century to the present day, particularly art created on the island.

In preparing to build from the ground up at a former tree nursery just two miles east of the museum’s current home, an Italianate-style building on Job’s Lane, the architects visited studios of artists both living (Chuck Close, Ross Bleckner) and dead (Willem de Kooning, Roy Lichtenstein). In studying their living and working conditions, they gained a sense of how local painters and sculptors became attached to the area.

The article goes on to describe the way that Long Island artists harness the light of the area's northern exposure: in studios converted from barns or sheds, optimally situated to take in the sunlight, with interiors painted white for a bright working space.

As an urbanite (even one living in a city that's not so dense), it's hard to imagine a similar trend emerging here. Artists follow the rents everywhere, of course, but in DC, there's no single place artists go. Emerging painters I know use their bedrooms for studio space; many of the city's most visible artists congregate in the Millennium Arts Center's studios. (That facility is as close as DC comes to the sort of warehouse space coveted by artists in other cities—the planners who designed the capital didn't include a warehouse district.) I don't think this was so different even when Washington crowned the art world—rents were cheaper then, but there wasn't a single style of studio.

Sounds as if Long Island offered more romantic studio options for artists looking for cheap space (back before, of course, most of the area developed). It's appropriate, then, that Herzog and de Meuron would rhyme the vernacular architecture in their design. The article describes the design as a response to the artists' processes—but ultimately, of course, the artists are working with the spaces that the region allows. Having never visited the Parrish, I don't have any feel of how the design fits the collection—but it seems to be an appropriate fit for Long Island.


Posted by Kriston on July 28, 2006 in American Art Elsewhere


Comments

Having never visited the Parrish, I don't have any feel of how the design fits the collection...

I think it's notable in this regard that the Parrish has an important group of work by Fairfield Porter, donated by him and/or his family. I think they'll fit quite well in the new space.

Posted by: JL | Jul 28, 2006

I think it worth noting that many of the most visible (as well as financially successful) artists in the metro D.C. area operate working studios at the Torpedo Factory in Alexandria, Virginia.

It is also the active dream of the Lorton Arts Foundation (supported by very real bond money just recently authorized by the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors) to convert the former D.C. Correctional Complex into a major arts center complete with working studio space for area artists. It will no doubt be interesting to see what art is inspired by the natural light filtering through former prison bars!

Seriously, this is a tremendous project that is well under way in Fairfax County that should help to provide expanded studio opportunities for local artists. More can be read about this project on the Lorton Arts Foundation's web site.

Posted by: James W. Bailey | Jul 31, 2006

James, I hadn't heard about the Lorton plans. Fifty-five acres is a good chunk of land.

Posted by: Kriston | Aug 1, 2006

Kriston, it is indeed quite an ambitious project that the Lorton Arts Foundation hopes to realize. An amazing amount of residential development (including a new bridge that was built over the river leading into historic Occoquan, Virginia, which is mere blocks from the former prison site) is sprouting up around this future art center site. The Washington Post's Fairfax Extra has provided some excellent reportage of the efforts to build the center. Unfortunately, I don't think this story has been reported in the main section of the paper. I may be wrong about that, but I don't recall reading anything.

Of special interest to me are the amazing murals (created by prisoners who were once housed at the D.C. Correctional Facility) that are scattered throughout the buildings and on walls located on the property. I understand that plans include the preservation of some of these murals.

I've toured the former prison site on several occasions (as a free person, I'd like to clarify!). It's easy to imagine this property being developed as a successful and major regional arts center. But it's also going to require an enormous amount of money to properly rehabilitate these former prison buildings in such a fashion that they will be artist (and visitor) friendly. I honestly think that will be a major challenge.

I also think that the political leadership of Fairfax County (where I live) sees this project as being a premiere opportunity for local government to assert a stronger leadership role in supporting the arts. Many of us in Fairfax County have long been urging the county to step up to the plate and start proactively supporting the development of new cultural facilities.

Fairfax County, one of the wealthiest counties in America, very clearly sees the amazing array of cultural projects that have been developed in recent years across the Potomac River in Montgomery County, Maryland – AFI, Black Rock Center for the Arts, Strathmore, to just name just a few – and recognizes that it is far behind the curve in having similar cultural facilities that are designed to serve the varied needs of its citizens. Hopefully, Fairfax County’s strong support of the Lorton project may mean that additional future cultural projects will be developed with the strong support of the county.

Posted by: James W. Bailey | Aug 1, 2006


Post a comment

Lively discussions and different opinions are encouraged. Questionable language, off-topic comments, and flames will either be edited or deleted. Comments are moderated and will not appear on Eye Level until they have been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In







TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345233c469e200d834a3656f53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Responsive Architecture: