USGS - science for a changing world

USGS Geoscience Data Catalog

Additional USGS Geoscience data can be found by geographic location or by publication series.

Thickness of the Danville Coal in Illinois

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [DIF]

Frequently-anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title: Thickness of the Danville Coal in Illinois
Abstract:
Thickness contours of 28", 42", and 66" were mapped for the Danville (No. 7) Coal in Illinois. This Arc/INFO coverage was created from public data only.
  1. How should this data set be cited?

    U.S. Geological Survey Central Region Energy Resources Team, 2002, Thickness of the Danville Coal in Illinois: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1625-D, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado.

    This is part of the following larger work.

    (ed.), J.R. Hatch , and (ed.), R.H. Affolter , 2002, Resource Assessment of the Springfield, Herrin, and Danville and Baker Coals in the Illinois Basin: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1625-D, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado.

    This is part of the following larger work.

    U.S. Geological Survey, 2002, National Coal Resource Assessment: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1625, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado.

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -91.5826
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -87.3840
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 42.4956
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 36.9535

  3. What does it look like?

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Calendar_Date: 1998
    Currentness_Reference: publication date of sources

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      This is a Vector data set. It contains the following vector data types (SDTS terminology):

      • Point (370)
      • String (751)
      • GT-polygon composed of chains (373)

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      The map projection used is Lambert Conformal Conic.

      Projection parameters:
      Standard_Parallel: 33
      Standard_Parallel: 45
      Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -89.5
      Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 33
      False_Easting: 914400.0 meters
      False_Northing: 0.0

      Planar coordinates are encoded using coordinate pair
      Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest unknown
      Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest unknown
      Planar coordinates are specified in feet

      The horizontal datum used is NAD27.
      The ellipsoid used is CLARKE1866.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378206.4 meters.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/294.98.

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

    Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
    The attribute items are in typical ARC/INFO feature class format. User-defined attributes are:
    Polygon attributes: THICK - thickness of the Springfield Coal
    0 - outside limit of coal seam (crop holes)
    2 - coal split or thin
    3 - coal missing due to sandstone channels
    5 - insufficient data
    22 - coal is less than 28" thick
    28 - coal is from 28"-42" thick
    42 - coal is from 42"-66" thick
    66 - coal is greater than or equal to 66" thick
    
    Areas defined as "no coal" or "Insufficient Data" are where the *position* of the coals is identifiable using the surrounding stratigraphy, but there is no coal preserved in the rock record. They are areas within the outcrop extent of the coal beds where we have data essentially demonstrating zero coal thickness. Some features may have been defined as "Unassessed." These are areas which exist within the coal extent but have not been assessed and have no value.


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Colin G. Treworgy
    Illinois State Geological Survey
    Senior Geologist
    615 East Peabody Drive
    Champaign, Illinois 61820
    U.S.A.

    217-244-2422 (voice)
    217-333-2830 (FAX)
    colin@isgs.uiuc.edu

    Hours_of_Service: 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday-Friday


Why was the data set created?

This map was created as part of the National Coal Resource Assessment being conducted by the USGS.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

    (source 1 of 16)
    Illinois State Geological Surve, Coal Section, 1997, Illinois Coal Reserves Assessment and Database Development: Final Report: Open File Series 1997-4, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    Type_of_Source_Media: digital data set
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 62500
    Source_Contribution:
    thickness isopachs for 11 counties in southeastern Illinois

    (source 2 of 16)
    Illinois State Geological Surve, Coal Section, 1996, Coal Resources of Illinois: Danville (No.7) Coal: ISGS GIS Database /gisdb/illinois/minres/coal7-84, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    Type_of_Source_Media: digital data set
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 500000
    Source_Contribution: thickness isopachs

    (source 3 of 16)
    Treworgy, J.D. and M.H. Bargh, 1984, Coal Resources of Illinois: Danville (No.7) Coal: ISGS Map same as title, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 500000
    Source_Contribution: All attribute information

    (source 4 of 16)
    Hunter, K., Original mylar separate for coal seam boundary lines on the map: Coal Resources of Illinois: Danville (No.7) Coal.

    Type_of_Source_Media: mylar
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 500000
    Source_Contribution:
    coal seam boundary lines and 1000 foot depth contours

    (source 5 of 16)
    Hunter, K., Original mylar separate for 150 foot depth contours on the map: Coal Resources of Illinois: Danville (No.7) Coal.

    Type_of_Source_Media: mylar
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 500000
    Source_Contribution: coal seam 150 foot depth contours

    (source 6 of 16)
    Hunter, K., Original mylar separate for Pennsylvanian boundary lines on the map: Coal Resources of Illinois: Danville (No.7) Coal.

    Type_of_Source_Media: mylar
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 500000
    Source_Contribution: Pennsylvanian boundary lines

    (source 7 of 16)
    Illinois State Geological Survey, 1984, Township Lines of Illinois: ISGS GIS Database /gisdb/illinois/illimap/townships, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    Type_of_Source_Media: digital data set
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000 and 62500
    Source_Contribution: townships lines where used as coal seam boundary

    (source 8 of 16)
    Illinois State Geological Survey, 1984, Illinois County Boundaries: ISGS GIS Database /gisdb/illinois/illimap/counties, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    Type_of_Source_Media: digital data set
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000 and 62500
    Source_Contribution: county boundaries where used as coal seam boundary

    (source 9 of 16)
    Cady, G.H., and others, 1952, Minable Coal Reserves of Illinois as of 1950: ISGS Bulletin 78, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    Other_Citation_Details:
    138 pages, 8 plates, 37 figures, 1 table Plate 7 available separately out of print
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 500000

    (source 10 of 16)
    Clegg, K.E, 1972, Subsurface Geology and Coal Resources of the Pennsylvanian System in De Witt, McLean, and Piatt Counties, Illinois: Circular 473, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    Other_Citation_Details: 25 pages, 4 plates, 8 figures, 1 table
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 125000

    (source 11 of 16)
    Jacobson, R.J., 1985, Coal Resources of Grundy, La Salle, and Livingston Counties, Illinois: ISGS Circular 536, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    Other_Citation_Details:
    58 pages, 6 plates including cross-section, 31 figures, 10 tables
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 125000

    (source 12 of 16)
    Jacobson, R.J., and L.E. Bengal, 1981, Strippable Coal Resources of Illinois, Part 7 Vermilion and Edgar Counties: Circular 521, Illinois St. Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    Other_Citation_Details: 24 pages, 1 plate, 6 figures, 3 tables
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 125000

    (source 13 of 16)
    Smith, W.H., 1957, Strippable Coal Reserves of Illinois. Part 1: Gallatin, Hardin, Johnson, Pope, Saline, and Williamson Counties: Circular 228, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    Other_Citation_Details:
    39 pages, 2 figures, 2 plates, 5 tables Plate 3 available separately
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 125000

    (source 14 of 16)
    Smith, W.H. and D.J. Berggren, 1963, Strippable Coal Reserves of Illinois. Part 5A: Fulton, Henry, Knox, Peoria, Stark, Tazewell, and parts of Bureau, Marshall, Mercer, and Warren Counties: Circular 348, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    Other_Citation_Details:
    59 pages, 4 plates, 7 figures, 8 tables Plates 1, 2, and 3 available separately
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 125000

    (source 15 of 16)
    Smith, W.H., 1968, Strippable Coal Reserves of Illinois, Part 6: LaSalle, Livingston, Grundy, Kankakee, Will, Putnam, and parts of Bureau and marshall Counties: Circular 419, Illinois St. Geological Survey, Champaign, Il.

    Other_Citation_Details:
    29 pages, 2 plates, 6 figures, 6 tables Plate 1 available separately
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 125000

    (source 16 of 16)
    Treworgy, C.G. and M.H. Bargh, 1982, Deep-Minable Coal Resources of Illinois: Circular 527, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    Other_Citation_Details: 65 pages, 2 plates, 25 figures, 5 tables
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 1500000

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: 1998 (process 1 of 1)
    Existing Coal Section resource coverages for each appropriate county contain detailed information on thickness, depth, and tonnage. The purpose of this project was to extract only the thickness isopachs for the seam and subsequently show only the 28", 42", and 66" thickness polygons. The extracted isopachs were compared to existing drill hole data for accuracy and confidentiality. Isopachs created from confidential data were not used. The resultant polygon coverage was created as follows:
    Step 1 - calc thickness of polygons
    RES THICK GE 66
    CALC THICK = 66 AS RES THICK > 0 AND THICK LT 30
    CALC THICK = 22 AS RES THICK GE 30 AND THICK LT 42
    CALC THICK = 28 AS RES THICK GE 42 AND THICK LT 66
    CALC THICK = 42 AS RES CTYPE96 (or CTYPE94) = 2
    CALC THICK = 2 AS RES CTYPE96 (or CTYPE94) = 3
    CALC THICK = 3 AS RES CTYPE96/94 = 5
    CALC THICK = 5 AS RES CTYPE96/94 = 6
    CALC THICK = 6 AS RES CTYPE96/94 = 9
    CALC THICK = 9
    Q STOP
    
    Step 2 - the coverage was checked to determine that the universe polygon thickness had a value of zero.
    Step 3 - the coverage was reviewed for other polygons with thicknesses of zero. If these polygons were outside the crop they were calced to -99.
    Step 3 - a point coverage was created from the Coal Sections' INFO database that showed the coal thickness and confidentiality status of the drill hole. This point coverage was overlaid on the above resource coverage, and it was determined whether the thickness isopachs were justified by public data points. Isopachs based mostly on confidential data points were removed.
    (cd /coal1/strat/info4)
    SEL SELECT-POINTS-JAMIE
    PURGE
    SEL STRATGEO1
    RES BY CO-CODE = [co-code]
    RES N-CODE = [seam#]
    REL SELECT-POINTS-JAMIE BY IDVS APPEND
    CALC $1COUNT = 0
    REL SELECT-POINTS-JAMIE BY IDVS SEQ
    CALC $1THICKNESS = $1THICKNESS + THICKNESS
    CALC $1COUNT = $1COUNT + 1
    SEL SELECT-POINTS-JAMIE
    RES COUNT = 0
    PURGE
    
    REL STRATHEAD BY IDVS SEQ
    MOVE $1CONFIDENTIAL TO CONFIDENTIAL
    REL STRATLOC BY IDS SEQ
    CALC LAMCORX = $1LAMCORX
    CALC LAMCORY = $1LAMCORY
    CALC COUNT = $RECNO
    
    SEL TEMP-DUPS-JAMIE
    PURGE
    
    /*this next section removes duplicates
    REL SELECT-POINTS-JAMIE
    REL TEMP-DUPS-JAMIE BY IDS APPEND
    MOVE 'Y' TO $1CONFIDENTIAL
    REL TEMP-DUPS-JAMIE BY IDS SEQ
    CALC $1RECNO = $RECNO
    RES $1CONFIDENTIAL = 'Y' AND CONFIDENTIAL = 'N'
    CALC $1RECNO = $RECNO
    AS
    RES $1RECNO = $RECNO
    NSEL
    PURGE
    
    OUTPUT TEMP-JAMIE INIT
    RES LAMCORX < 1
    PURGE
    
    CALC $COMMA-SWITCH = -1
    DIS $RECNO,',',LAMCORX,',',LAMCORY PRINT
    
    cd /coal13/natl-coal-assmt/coal-isopachs/<seam>/<county>
    arc
    generate springpts
    input /coal1/strat/info4/temp-jamie
    point
    q
    build springpts point
    
    additem springpts.pat springpts.pat idvs 15 15 c
    additem springpts.pat springpts.pat confidential 1 1 c
    additem springpts.pat springpts.pat thickness 7 7 n 2
    
    info
    arc
    ADIR /coal1/strat/info4
    take sta SELECT-POINTS-JAMIE
    SEL SELECT-POINTS-JAMIE
    EXT
    /coal1/strat/info4/sta216dat
    SEL SPRINGPTS.PAT
    REL SELECT-POINTS-JAMIE BY SPRINGPTS-ID LINK
    MOVE $1CONFIDENTIAL TO CONFIDENTIAL
    MOVE $1IDVS TO IDVS
    CALC THICKNESS = $1THICKNESS
    
    Step 4 - the resource coverages were dissolved on thickness Example for Fayette County: dissolve res2790-fay ds2790-fay thick poly
    Step 5 - the state was divided into 3 regions and the dissolved county coverages within each region were mapjoined in Arc. Each region was reviewed for discrepancies across county boundaries, and edited accordingly.
    join1 = Warren, Knox, Peoria, Woodford, McLean, Tazewell, Fulton, Schuyler, Mason, Menard, Logan, Dewitt, Piatt, Macon, Sangamon, Christian, and Shelby counties.
    join2 = Douglas, Edgar, Coles, Cumberland, Clark, Effingham, Jasper, Crawford, Richland, Lawrence, Edwards, Wabash, and White counties.
    join3 = Fayette, Marion, Clay, Jefferson, Wayne, Hamilton, Franklin, Randolph, Perry, Jackson, Williamson, Saline, and Gallatin counties.
    Step 6 - After editing, the 3 regions were eventually mapjoined as one coverage, join123d. In this coverage all mines and mine boundaries (thick = 6 or thick = 9) were calced to the predominant thickness in the area (be it 22", 28", 42", or 66"), using both ArcEdit and ArcView.
    Step 7 - dissolve join123d join-total thick poly
    Step 8 - edit sliver polygons in join-total
    Step 9 - Pieces of the #5 crop that were needed were pulled from /coal3/coal-resources/statemaps/springcrop and put to join-total.
    Step 10 - There are counties that have Springfield coal data but do not have resource coverages (coal too thin for resource calculations). The isopachs for these counties were pulled from /coal3/coal-resources/statemaps/coal5-84 and put to join-total, and the polygons calced accordingly.
    Step 11 - dissolve join-total coal5-thick thick poly

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

    Danville Coal thickness isopachs were updated for Coles, Edgar, Cumberland, Clark, Jasper, Crawford, Effingham, Richland, and Lawrence counties in 1996. The updated resource coverages were used for these counties. The thickness values for the remaining counties were extracted from previous resource coverages. Any discrepancies were compared to the original source paper map or mylar separate. Isopachs are based on public data available to the ISGS at the time of the original map compilation. Accuracy of this compilation is dependent on the locational and measurement accuracy of the original data points, the distribution of data points, the local variability of the coal seam and other factors.

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    This is a generalized depiction of regional ground condition. The horizontal positional accuracy was verified by manual overlay of source and hard-copy plots. Arcs within line-width of source maps are deemed acceptable. For positional accuracy of source maps, contact the ISGS Coal Section.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    In areas of limited data, boundaries have been generalized using section lines and/or county boundaries.

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    Polygon and chain-node topology is present. The coverage was checked for complete chain-node topology (no dangling arcs, except where appropriate), polygon labels (one per polygon, except for universal polygon), correct regions topology, boundary values appropriate for map projection and map units, and appropriate "fuzzy" tolerances. There are no known arc, polygon or region attribute values outside the appropriate value domains.


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints: none
Use_Constraints: none

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    USGS Information Services
    Box 25286 Denver Federal Center
    Denver, CO 80225
    USA

    1-888-ASK-USGS (voice)
    303-202-4693 (FAX)
    ask@usgs.gov

  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    USGS Professional Paper 1625-D

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    This Compact Disc-Read Only Memory (CD-ROM) publication was prepared by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.
    Although all data and software published on this CD-ROM are used by the U.S. Geological Survey, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the U.S. Geological Survey as to the accuracy of the data and related materials and (or) the functioning of the software. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed by the U.S. Geological Survey in the use of these data, software, or related materials.

  4. How can I download or order the data?


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 02-Jun-1998
Last Reviewed: 28-Mar-2002
Metadata author:
Illinois State Geological Survey
c/o Colin G. Treworgy
Senior Geologist
615 East Peabody Drive
Champaign, Illinois 61820
U.S.A.

217-244-2422 (voice)
217-333-2830 (FAX)
colin@isgs.uiuc.edu

Hours_of_Service: 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday-Friday
Metadata standard:
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)


This page is <http://geo-nsdi.er.usgs.gov/metadata/professional-paper/1625/d/Il/Da/ildathk.faq.html>
How other people discovered this page

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://geo-nsdi.er.usgs.gov/metadata/professional-paper/1625/d/Il/Da/ildathk.faq.html
Page Contact Information: Peter Schweitzer
Page Last Modified: Monday, 10-Nov-2008 12:20:39 EST

Generated by mp version 2.9.8 on Mon Nov 10 12:20:39 2008