USGS - science for a changing world

USGS Geoscience Data Catalog

Additional USGS Geoscience data can be found by geographic location or by publication series.

High-Resolution Seismic-Reflection Surveys of Lake Baikal, Siberia, 1990-1992

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [DIF]

Frequently-anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
High-Resolution Seismic-Reflection Surveys of Lake Baikal, Siberia, 1990-1992
Abstract:
As part of a cooperative project to study the paleoclimatic record of Lake Baikal a joint American-Russian team collected about 3600 km of high- resolution seismic-reflection profiles during three expeditions between 1990 and 1992. Two basic seismic systems were used: (1) a 3.5 kHz system, which gave resolution of < 0.5 m and average sediment penetration of 30-50 m, and (2) a single-channel water-gun system, which gave resolution of less than a meter and average sediment penetration of 300-400 m. The water-gun data were digitized from analog tape and processed to increase their quality. These data have been used to define and map sedimentary environments in the lake and to choose the best coring sites for paleoclimatic analyses, including the 1993 site for the Baikal Drilling Project.
  1. How should this data set be cited?

    Colman, Steven M., Foster, David S., and Hatton, Josephine, 1996, High-Resolution Seismic-Reflection Surveys of Lake Baikal, Siberia, 1990-1992: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-274.

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: 103.5
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: 110.0
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 56
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 51.5

  3. What does it look like?

    <http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/~jhatton/baik-seis/lake4.htmlake4.gif> (gif)
    Map of Lake Baikal showing ship-tracklines from 1990, 1991 and 1992 cruises.
    <http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/~jhatton/baik-seis/ve28a.gif> (gif)
    Erosional channel on the floor of the southern end of the North Basin, Lake Baikal.
    <http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/~jhatton/baik-seis/ve17a.gif> (gif)
    Middle portion of a segment of a dip line on the slope of the Selenga Delta, Lake Baikal. Core site 305 is also shown.

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Beginning_Date: 1990
    Ending_Date: 1992
    Currentness_Reference: publication date

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Steven M. Colman
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543
    United States of America

    (508) 457-2341 (voice)
    scolman@usgs.gov


Why was the data set created?

From 1990 to 1992, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the Limnological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Irkutsk, the U.S. National Science Foundation, and the University of South Carolina, conducted three scientific expeditions on Lake Baikal, Siberia. These expeditions were part of a joint Russian-American project to obtain and decipher the paleoclimate record contained in the sediments of Lake Baikal (Lake Baikal Paleoclimate Project Members, 1992). These expeditions had two primary thrusts, (1) to obtain high-resolution seismic- reflection profiles of selected areas of the lake, and (2) to obtain sediment cores for paleoclimatic and paleolimnological analyses.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

    Colman et al.,1992 (source 1 of 7)
    Colman, S.M., Karabanov, E.B., Williams, D.F., Hearn, P.P. Jr., King, J.W., Orem, W.H., Bradbury, J.P., Shanks, W.C. III, Jones, G.A., and Carter, S.J., 1992, Lake Baikal paleoclimate project, southeastern Siberia: Initial dating and paleoenvironmental results: IPPCCE Newsletter no. 6.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Use of seismic data to map sedimentary environments

    Colman et al., 1993 (source 2 of 7)
    Colman, S.M., Hutchinson, D.R., Scholz, C.A.,, and Golmshtok, A.J., 1993, Interaction between deltaic sedimentation and tectonics in a large rift: Selenga Delta, Lake Baikal, Siberia: EOS, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union volume 74.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution:
    Application of seismic data to mapping sedimentary environments. Tectonic setting of Lake Baikal

    Colman et al. (in press) (source 3 of 7)
    Colman, S.M., Karabanov, E.B., Nelson, C.H. III, and Bardardinov, A.A., Unknown, Stratigraphy and depositional environments of sediments in Lake Baikal from high-resolution seismic-reflection profiles:.

    This is part of the following larger work.

    Mats, V., and Hutchinson, D.R., Unknown, The Geology of Lake Baikal: Cambridge University Press, London.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution:
    Stratigraphy and depositional environments of Lake Baikal as determined from seismic-reflection profiles.

    Hutchinson et al., 1992 (source 4 of 7)
    Hutchinson, D.R., Golmshtok, A.J., Zonenshain, L.P., Moore, T.C., Scholz, C.A., and Klitgord, K.D., 1992, Depositional and tectonic framework of the rift basins of Lake Baikal from multichannel seismic data.: Geology volume 20, Geological Society of America, Kansas, USA.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution:
    Seismic study of the active continental rift containing Lake Baikal.

    Lake Baikal Paleoclimate Project Members, 1992 (source 5 of 7)
    Lake Baikal Paleoclimate Project Members, 1992, Initial results of the joint Russian-American project on the paleoclimatic record of Lake Baikal, southeastern Siberia: EOS, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union volume 73, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.,.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Purpose of Paleoclimatic Studies of Lake Baikal Seismic Records

    Levi et al., 1992 (source 6 of 7)
    Levi, K.J. et al., 1992, The map of active faults of Baikal:.

    This is part of the following larger work.

    Congress, International Geological , 1992, Abstracts, 29th International Geological Congress: International Geological Congress, Kyoto, Japan.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Information about other seismic studies of Lake Baikal

    Wong et al., 1990 (source 7 of 7)
    Wong, H.K., Liebzeit, G., Anton, K., and von Haugwitz, W., 1990, Unpublished cruise report, on file at Limnological Institute, Irkutsk,Russia..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Information about other seismic surveys of Lake Baikal

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: Unknown (process 1 of 6)
    Collection of Positional Data
    For all surveys, a non-differential Magellan Nav Pro 1000 Global Positioning System (GPS) navigation system was used for positioning. This system provided accuracy of about 100 m. Positions were recorded on computer disk at 10-second intervals.

    Person who carried out this activity:

    Steven M. Colman
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543
    United States of America

    (508) 457-2341 (voice)
    scolman@usgs.gov

    Date: Unknown (process 2 of 6)
    Subbottom Seismic-reflection Profiling using the ORE 3.5 kHz sub- bottom profiling system.
    During the first (1990) expedition, the USGS used an ORE 3.5 kHz sub- bottom profiling system, which consisted of a towed four-transducer array that served as both the sound source and receiver, and an ORE Model 140, 10 kw transceiver. This data was graphically recorded on an EPC 4800 plotter and was recorded on a Hewlett Packard 8 track tape deck for playback capabilities and archiving. In most water depths, subbottom reflections were successfully acquired using this technique. However, over the deepest part of the lake (more than about 1400 m), the seismic data became somewhat distorted and weak due to several contributing factors, including signal attenuation in the water column, loss of energy by reflections from thermocline layers, and the limited beam-width output from the four-transducer array. During the 1991 and 1992 expeditions, the 3.5 kHz data acquisition system remained the same.

    Person who carried out this activity:

    Steven M. Colman
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543
    United States of America

    (508) 457-2341 (voice)
    scolman@usgs.gov

    Date: Unknown (process 3 of 6)
    Subbottom Seismic-reflection Profiling using the Huntec "boomer" sub- bottom profiling system.
    The second system used in 1990 was a Huntec shallow-towed, broad-band electro-mechanical "boomer system" with a surface-towed Benthos 100- element hydrophone streamer. The boomer system proved to be inadequate at maximum power output levels (one kilojoule (kj)), apparently due to signal attenuation in the water column and to high levels of ship noise in the frequency band of the boomer source.

    Person who carried out this activity:

    Steven M. Colman
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543
    United States of America

    (508) 457-2341 (voice)
    scolman@usgs.gov

    Date: Unknown (process 4 of 6)
    Subbottom Seismic-reflection Profiling using a 15 ci. water-gun and 100-element hydrophone streamer.
    The USGS used, during the 1991 and 1992 Lake Baikal expeditions, a 15-cubic-inch water gun and 200-element hydrophone acquisition system. An Atlas Kopco electric compressor was used to provide 3000 pounds per square inch (psi) of air pressure at 20 standard cubic feet per minute (scfm) for the sound source. ,It was decided that the best sound-source system configuration for Lake Baikal would be to operate the compressor to provide a pressure of 3000 psi (instead of the more commonly used 2000 psi) and to modify the ports of the water gun. The time necessary to increase the pressure in the water gun required that it be fired only every seven seconds, rather than every three or four seconds. The modification of the water gun ports consisted of using only the side ports of the gun, so that it would not expel water upward through the surface of the lake; the result is increased power and frequency content. By towing the instrument at 15 inches below the water surface and firing it at 3000 psi, utilizing the special ports, it is possible to reach an upper frequency of 3000 Hz, with an increase in power output of 50 percent, from 1.0 to 1.5 kj.

    Person who carried out this activity:

    Steven M. Colman
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543
    United States of America

    (508) 457-2341 (voice)
    scolman@usgs.gov

    Date: Unknown (process 5 of 6)
    Digitization of 3.5 kHz Data
    Small amounts of the 3.5 kHz data were digitized from analog tape, but because of the limited amount of processing possible with this narrow frequency-band data, only minor scale and gain changes were attempted for short segments of data. For most interpretive analyses, the analog field data were used. The original 3.5 kHz data are available for inspection at the U.S. Geological Survey Data Library in Woods Hole (MA 02543).

    Person who carried out this activity:

    Steven M. Colman
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543
    United States of America

    (508) 457-2341 (voice)
    scolman@usgs.gov

    Date: Unknown (process 6 of 6)
    The analog field data from the water-gun system were of limited use, because the seven-second (instead of three or four-second) firing rate resulted in field data that was highly compressed in a horizontal direction, resulting in excessive vertical exaggeration. For this reason all of the water-gun data were digitized using a Masscomp computer system. The data were digitized from the analog tapes using a sampling rate of 0.5 ms for the first 3 s of each shot, and the digitized data were stored in SEGY format. For routine plotting purposes, the data were subject to a digital band-pass filter, typically 30 to 500 Hz, and an exponential time-varying gain function. The data were plotted using a variable-area display with horizontal and vertical scales that resulted in a vertical exaggeration of about eight to one. This vertical exaggeration was a vast improvement over the original field records, which had a vertical exaggeration of 50-60 to one.

    Person who carried out this activity:

    Steven M. Colman
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543
    United States of America

    (508) 457-2341 (voice)
    scolman@usgs.gov

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

    Subbottom Seismic-reflection Profiling using the ORE 3.5 kHz sub- bottom profiling system.
    The 3.5 kHz profiles are of generally of excellent quality. They typically provide vertical resolution of less than 0.5 m and subbottom penetration of 30 to 50 m in mid-range (500-1000 m) water depths. Under favorable water-depth and sediment condition (soft, fine-grained deposits), subbottom penetration was well in excess of 50 m.
    In most water depths subbottom reflections were successfully acquired using this technique. However, over the deepest part of the lake (more than about 1400 m), the seismic data became somewhat distorted and weak due to several contributing factors, including signal attenuation in the water column, loss of energy by reflections from thermocline layers, and the limited beam-width output from the four-transducer array.
    Subbottom Seismic-reflection Profiling using the Huntec shallow-towed, broad-band, electromechanical "boomer system" during the 1990 expedition.
    The boomer system proved to be inadequate at maximum power output levels (one kilojoule (kj)), apparently due to signal attenuation in the water column and to high levels of ship noise in the frequency band of the boomer source.
    Subbottom Seismic-reflection Profiling using a 15-cubic-inch water gun and 200-element hydrophone acquisition system.
    The water-gun data are of excellent quality, but required processing to achieve their full utility. Typical sediment penetration in mid-range (500-1000 m) water depths was 200 to 400 m. Vertical resolution was less than one meter. Signal attenuation and sediment type affected subbottom penetration, but under favorable conditions, penetration of 500 to 600 m was achieved. Excellent records were obtained from the floor of the North Basin of the lake, which is underlain by sandy turbidites, indicating that coarse-grained sediments had less of an effect on the quality and penetration of the water-gun data than they did for the 3.5 kHz data.

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    A non-differential Magellan Nav Pro 1000 Global Positioning System (GPS) navigation system was used fo rpositioning. This system provided accuracy of about 100 m. Positions were recorded on computer disk at 10-second intervals.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    Subbottom Seismic-reflection Profiling using the ORE 3.5 kHz sub- bottom profiling system.
    During the 1991 and 1992 expeditions, the 3.5 kHz data acquisition system remained the same. However, during the 1992 expedition, two of the four transducers failed, so that adequate subbottom records could only be obtained in water depths shallower than about 500 m.

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    Navigational Data
    ASCII text files containing shiptrack data consisting of date, time, latitude and longitude are supplied for each cruise. The format of indivdual data records is different for each year. Data for each year is recorded as follows:
    1990 record format: HH:mm:SS.S LL.LLLLLLLLL NNN.NNNNNNNNN
    1991 record format: MMDDYY HH.mm.SS.S LL.LLLLLLLLL NNN.NNNNNNNNN
    1992 record format: JJJ:HH:mm:SS LL.LLLLLL NNN.NNNNNN
    Y = Year M = Month D = Day J = Julian day H = Hour m = Minute S = Second L = Latitude N = Longitude
    An exception occurs in the 1992 data where the sampling interval increases from approximately 10 seconds to several minutes. Seconds are no longer recorded and the decimal fields of latitude and longitude expand.
    The exceptional format is: JJJ:HH:mm LL.LLLLLLLLL NNN.NNNNNNNNN
    This format is used from 206:13:00 to 206:15:45 (Julian) and represents the end of line 19 and lines 20 and 21 in their entirety.


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints: None

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    USGS ESIC-Open-File Report Sales
    Mail Stop 517
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Box 25286, Building 810
    Denver Federal Center
    Denver, Colorado 80225-0286

    (303) 202-4210 (voice)
    (303) 236-4031 (FAX)

  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    USGS Open-File Report 96-274 High-Resolution Seismic-Reflection Surveys of Lake Baikal, Siberia, 1990-1992

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

  4. How can I download or order the data?

  5. What hardware or software do I need in order to use the data set?

    Use of this dataset requires a computer equipped with a CD-ROM reader and sufficient graphics and processing capability to run HTML browser software such as NCSA Mosaic.
    The original seismic data files are included with the CD-ROM distribution in compressed form. GZIP, a commonly available data compression / decompression program must be used do decompress the files. The decompressed files are in "SEGY" format. This format is common to most seismic data-processing software.


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 27-Sep-1996
Metadata author:
Kevin M. Foley
Mail Stop 918
U.S. Geological Survey
12201 Sunrise Valley Drive
Reston, VA 20192

(703) 648-5285 (voice)
(703) 648-6560 (FAX)
kfoley@usgs.gov

Metadata standard:
FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)


This page is <http://geo-nsdi.er.usgs.gov/metadata/open-file/96-274/metadata.faq.html>
How other people discovered this page

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://geo-nsdi.er.usgs.gov/metadata/open-file/96-274/metadata.faq.html
Page Contact Information: Peter Schweitzer
Page Last Modified: Monday, 10-Nov-2008 12:19:49 EST

Generated by mp version 2.9.8 on Mon Nov 10 12:19:49 2008