The National Institutes of Health. Office of Community Liaison.
Home > Meeting Minutes

Community Liaison Council Meeting Minutes
June 19, 2003, 4–6 p.m.
Natcher Conference Center, Building 45, Room D
DRAFT

HANDOUTS

  • Agenda, June 19, 2003
  • May 22, 2003, Draft Community Liaison Council (CLC) Meeting Minutes
  • NIH CLC Members as of June 18, 2003
  • Residential Permit Parking Program—Overview Slide Copies
  • Access and Perimeter Security Plan, (site map) National Institutes of Health
  • Maryland-National Capital Park Planning Commission (M-NCPPC) Announcement: Community Forum on Mandatory Referral: Laboratory Building 33
  • R&W, June 2003, NIH & NOAA Recreation and Welfare Association (R&W) Newsletter
  • Street SMART—Drivers, Pedestrians, Cyclists Brochure
  • NIAID Building 33 Complex Preliminary Site & Building Plans/Final Foundation Submission to the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC), June 6, 2003
  • Building 33 Complex NIH Campus, Bethesda, Maryland, National Capital Planning Commission Preliminary Site & Building Plans/Final Foundation Submission, Drawings: Site/Landscaping Plans, Floor Plans, Elevations, Site/Building Sections, and Perspective Renderings

WELCOME

Tom Gallagher, Ph.D., Director, Office of Community Liaison (OCL), Office of the Director (OD), NIH, welcomed members of the CLC.

ANNOUNCEMENTS

Dr. Gallagher announced a public forum, sponsored by the M-NCPPC, to be held at the Bethesda-Chevy Chase Regional Center (B-CCRC) on July 1, 2003, at 7 p.m. Deborah Snead of the B-CCRC distributed a flyer and explained the purpose of this public forum. Ms. Snead said the staff of the M-NCPPC will present information on the proposed NIH Laboratory Building 33's site plan and garage. She added that the M-NCPPC invites questions and input from the community before the Mandatory Referral hearing scheduled to take place on July 17, 2003.

Lucy Ozarin, M.D., Whitehall Condominium Association, asked for more information about Mandatory Referral. Ronald Wilson, Division of Facilities Planning, Office of Research Facilities Development and Operations (ORF), NIH, said this is a courtesy referral as the County has the right to review any County federal project and had asked to see the project plan. Stephanie Sechrist, of the NCPC, added that this process is to review the Building 33 project plan and check whether it is consistent with the NIH Master Plan. Ms. Sechrist said the NIH had referred the plan to NCPC and the County at the same time, and it is generally consistent with the NIH Master Plan. George Oberlander, Huntington Parkway Citizens Association, added that the term "mandatory" is a Maryland State term, and means little in terms of the review. He said it is not a term specified by NCPC.

Dr. Gallagher introduced a new CLC member, Tom Robertson, who was welcomed as the new representative from Parkwood Residents Association. Mr. Robertson said this referral and process, which he said has worked well in the past, is an opportunity for the NIH to be a good neighbor and to share its plans with the larger community. Mr. Robertson responded to a query from Ralph Schofer, Maplewood Citizens Association, who asked whether the M-NCPPC has any input that could be brought to bear on this project. Mr. Robertson said that the M-NCPPC functions as a conduit to NCPC. Ms. Sechrist said the Commission meets on the first Thursday of the month, and she offered to report the date and time for the August 2003 NCPC meeting at the July CLC meeting.

PRESENTATIONS

Presentation of Responses to CLC Member Questions from the May 2003 CLC Meeting
by Tom Gallagher, Ph.D., Director, Office of Community Liaison, OD, NIH

Dr. Gallagher said he compiled questions associated with the presentations in the May CLC meeting and wanted to provide the answers. He referred to a map that was handed out and to a larger more up-to-date rendition at the front of the room.

IDB & LSY
Acronyms referred to in Arturo Giron's presentation about the perimeter fence include IDB and LSY. The names of these firms are for IDB the initials only, and for LSY, Louviere, Stratton, and Yokel.

Boulders & Campus Perimeter Fence
Boulders have been placed at Campus locations where vehicle gates are situated and areas vulnerable to penetration by vehicles. The boulders, approximately 3 feet high and 3 to 5 feet wide, will be incorporated with other fence and landscaping design elements. Eleanor Rice, Locust Hill Civic Association, thought the ravine area north of the Metro area is a sensitive area that should be well protected. Dr. Gallagher said in that location there is a vehicular fence and cable fence positioned closely together. He noted this area is extremely well protected.

Perimeter Areas at the South Campus Border
Members questioned the positions of various fence elements along the bike path and the buffer zone, particularly on the south side of the Campus where residential property borders NIH property. The pedestrian fence from Roosevelt to Rosewood Drive is 40 feet from the bike path, and there is a 12-foot setback from the existing NIH parking lot. Stephen Sawicki, Edgewood Glenwood Citizens Association, asked about the existing "jersey" wall in this parking area. Dr. Gallagher said he thought those barriers would be removed.

Mr. Sawicki expressed concern about the safety of those using the pedestrian walkway, especially during the winter when it is nearly dark by 4:30 p.m. Dr. Gallagher said there would be low level, 4-foot high, lighting along the path. In addition, Mr. Sawicki wanted to know about security patrols at the north and south of the Campus. Dr. Gallagher said that both police and security guards would patrol these areas inside and outside the fence. Lesley Hildebrand, Huntington Terrace Citizens Association, wanted information about patrol of the path on weekends. Dr. Gallagher said he would pose the question to Mr. Giron.

At Maple Ridge and Rosewood, Dr. Gallagher said steel cable and boulder reinforcement would be used, and a cable barrier would be placed at Maple Ridge. The bike path and fence are approximately 160 to 200 feet from this barrier and the old chain link fence. Dr. Gallagher said the pedestrian walkway is next to the fence in this area. Dr. Gallagher noted there would be a pedestrian entrance from McKinley. In follow-up, Randy Schools, R&W, noted that each vehicular entrance also has pedestrian access. Mr. Wilson noted there are gates for pedestrian access only at other locations and that pedestrians may enter Campus at each vehicle entrance as well.

Center Drive Entrance at Old Georgetown Road
At the Center Drive entrance at Old Georgetown Road, Dr. Gallagher reported that to prevent backups on Old Georgetown Road during peak traffic times, there would be a guard stand positioned at the center island 120 feet from Old Georgetown Road. Nancy Hoos, Sonoma Citizens Association, wondered if this entrance would continue to admit construction vehicles for ongoing projects after the Center Drive gate is installed. Dr. Gallagher said he would verify whether contractors' construction vehicles will be admitted through this gate.

Bike Path Route, Cedar Lane, and West Drive
Mr. Oberlander asked for clarification of the location of the bike path. Dr. Gallagher pointed to areas on the large site map noting that on the north side of Campus there is a sidewalk along Cedar Lane. He said the bike path extends from Old Georgetown Road on the west side and runs alongside the fence past the proposed storm water pond on the south. Mr. Sawicki said the bike path at NIH connects with the Crescent Trail bike path. In addition, Mr. Oberlander noted an anomaly where the 100-foot pedestrian standoff is shown to cross on the north and the residential side of Cedar Lane near West Drive. Mr. Wilson said this included a 250-foot standoff for vehicles and a 100-foot standoff for pedestrians. Mr. Oberlander suggested that this information should be clarified on the site map. Dr. Gallagher said he would find out about the line Mr. Oberlander mentioned.

West Lane Feasibility Study
Dr. Gallagher reported that a feasibility study was in process for the use of West Drive by patients and their families who stay in or travel to the Clinical Center, Children's Inn, and Family Lodge.

Presentation on Residential Parking and Permits
by Walter Mitton, Community Relations Specialist, OCL, OD, NIH

Dr. Gallagher introduced Walter Mitton, Community Relations Specialist, OCL, OD, NIH, who contacted Montgomery County Residential Permit Parking Office (RPPO) for information about establishing a residential parking program.

Mr. Mitton prefaced his presentation by informing the CLC that he had invited Jean Gries from the Montgomery County Department of Public Works & Transportation (DPWT) to attend the next CLC meeting on July 17, 2003. Mr. Mitton reported that there is a two-step process that residents or civic associations are required to follow to create a residential permit parking area. First, a written request and a petition, signed by two-thirds of the houses of each block, must be submitted to the DPWT. In signing the petition, residents are agreeing to have signs installed on their block and to obtain a permit for a fee. Second, if the DPWT's evaluation is favorable, boundaries are established and the petitioning group is notified. Mr. Mitton said this process may take 8 to 12 months. He added that the DPWT's Department of Traffic and Parking Services (DTPS) uses the M-NCPPC civic association boundaries to establish the area for permit parking. After an association's zone receives approval as a permit area, those who live within the area, but not on blocks originally designated, may submit their petition to be included in the zone. This process takes approximately 3 to 4 months.

Mr. Mitton reported that the costs associated with obtaining a permit include a $250 public hearing fee and a $20 fee for each vehicle registered to each address. The fee covers a two-year period before renewal. In addition, one permanent visitor permit is available per dwelling for an additional $20. He noted that unless a visitor is staying more than 30 days, there is no charge for a obtaining a temporary visitor permit from various RPPOs. Mr. Mitton said parking in these areas is restricted from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. He said variations, such as parking for those attending a special event, are considered on a case-by-case basis. He said enforcement during the weekday hours is by the Parking Operations Office at 240-777-8744 and on weekends by the County Police Department at 301-279-8000. Mr. Mitton noted there is an appeal process for those ticketed, e.g., a newly purchased car, before the permanent tag is obtained, or a vehicle parked while its owner is attending to a home repair.

Mr. Oberlander asked whether an existing zone could be expanded without a hearing. Mr. Mitton said he would relay that question to Ms. Gries; however, he believed it might require a hearing. Deborah Michaels, Glenbrook Village Homeowners Association, said her association has resorted to towing, posting area streets as private, with signs warning about towing, because non-resident NIH employees (identified by their wearing of badges) have acquired residential parking permits. Marilyn Mazuzan, Town of Oakmont, said her neighborhood has a parking program and a volunteer who checks on vehicles and contacts the police when a violator is spotted. She said this has been very effective. Ms. Miller said it should be possible to trace offenders by their license plate number. Mr. Schofer notices parking by contractors along Cedar Lane and Linden. He thought that some of this parking is temporary because it is related to current construction on Campus.

Dr. Gallagher noted that his office and the NIH interact with the community and various agencies about resolving residents' complaints. However, Dr. Gallagher said the County is responsible for enforcement in restricted areas, and where parking is not restricted, those parking on these streets are not breaking the law. He remarked that some of those parking in residential areas are performing some function at the NIH and many of the vehicles are trucks belonging to construction workers. Although OCL staff members have placed flyers on vehicle windshields asking contractors to park elsewhere, NIH cannot enforce the law, and Dr. Gallagher said he has few solutions to offer those reporting parking incidents to his office.

Dr. Gallagher noted that he has checked the off-site parking area designated for contractors at a Pooks Hill location. Dr. Gallagher said that at 5:30 a.m. there are parking spots available, but by 5:45 a.m., no spaces remain and contractors must find other locations to park their vehicles. Ginny Miller, Wyngate Citizens Association, suggested making parking regulations and penalties part of the NIH's construction contracts and employment agreements. Dr. Gallagher offered that while some methods would work to discourage those parking in residential areas, he felt that the problem would not be solved by this method. Instead, he thought this would move the problem along to other neighborhoods. He reminded members that a contracting employer is limited to trying to discourage parking on residential streets, because the streets, unless designated otherwise, are public.

Since the remote parking area is oversubscribed, Mr. Robertson suggested initiating a truck pool similar to the NIH carpool efforts that have worked to reduce the number of vehicles traveling to Campus. He said that because this would mean parking farther out, some incentive would be needed to make it effective. Dr. Gallagher said paid parking by NIH employees could create more parking opportunities on Campus but might encourage parking in local neighborhoods. Mr. Schools said paid parking was tried in 1978, and it did not work. Dr. Gallagher said NIH is looking for more off-Campus parking space.

Ms. Hildebrand had asked about methods to prevent or restrict access by those who cut illegally through the Huntington Terrace neighborhood streets while trying to reach Lincoln Drive and Old Georgetown Road near Suburban Hospital. Mr. Mitton stated that Ms. Gries already had mailed a package to Ms. Hildebrand that provided information addressing this issue. Ms. Miller said to resolve this unlawful access would be a difficult process. Ms. Rice added that Locust Hill had a problem with hundreds of cars cutting through to Cedar Lane despite having signs posted. She said the police enforce the law sometimes, but they have other problems to handle.

Dr. Gallagher thanked Mr. Mitton for his presentation.

Presentation on Pedestrian Safety Initiative
by Anna Hargrave, Pedestrian Safety Assistant, Montgomery County, Maryland

Dr. Gallagher said the remainder of member questions concerned pedestrian and cyclist issues. He invited Anna Hargrave, a Montgomery County Pedestrian Safety Assistant, to present information on efforts to reduce the number of fatalities and injuries along roadways and at crosswalks. She explained the history of the Blue Ribbon Panel on Pedestrian and Traffic Safety and the subsequent campaign which combines the three E's of traffic safety: education, enforcement, and engineering. The Pedestrian Safety Advisory Committee is currently working to implement the 54 recommendations detailed in the final report of the Blue Ribbon Panel. Ms. Hargrave gave a summary of enforcement initiatives such as the crosswalk "stings" and engineering innovations like the countdown pedestrian signals. She then detailed the education and outreach efforts. She reported that in October of 2002, the metropolitan region launched the "Street Smart" education campaign which was initially created by Montgomery County with a grant from the State Highway Administration (SHA). For the first month of the campaign, public service announcements with testimonies from a police officer, a victim and a victim's loved one were run on radios and a television PSA was also run on county cable. She displayed a number of posters that had been placed in public areas, such as transit and bus shelters, and distributed along with tip cards to grocery stores, small retailers, regional government centers, liquor stores, and schools. The message was targeted both to the drivers of vehicles and pedestrians. Graphics emphasized messages associated with school zones, crosswalks, and bike safety. She noted that both English and Spanish flyers were printed and distributed. She also informed the committee of the current grant from the State Highway Administration to develop a campaign for the Latino population which is disproportionately represented in pedestrian fatalities. 22 percent of County fatalities are Latino pedestrians; whereas, the County's Latino population is 11 percent. The Latino campaign will focus on teaching new arrivals to recognize and utilize the crosswalk as well as look left/right/left before crossing a street. The County's health promoters, who use peer education to spread information about health issues and disease, will be trained and equipped with materials from this campaign to teach Latino residents about pedestrian safety. Ms. Hargrave also noted that the campaign would have a visual focus due to the varied levels of literacy in the target population.

Ms Hargrave encouraged the committee to utilize the materials and resources available to educate both residents and NIH employees of their responsibilities as drivers and pedestrians. She described one creative effort where those following safe and correct procedures while crossing the street in Wheaton were presented a flyer with a coupon for free coffee at a nearby Dunkin' Donuts shop.

Dr. Ozarin said that drivers especially needed education about pedestrians at crosswalks. She mentioned that the NIH has put up signs that work well. Debra Liverpool, Bethesda YMCA, noted the challenge of 20 six-year-old children crossing Old Georgetown Road at Beech Drive to reach the YMCA. Ms. Miller said pedestrians in downtown Bethesda often do not use the crosswalk or even look for approaching cars, particularly at Woodmont and Bethesda Avenues. Ms. Hoos said she hoped there was funding to identify potential pedestrian problem spots near NIH, for example at Greentree and Old Georgetown Roads. Dr. Gallagher said the crossings at the pedestrian access gate areas should be considered as well. Mr. Schools had observed a problem area at Strathmore Hall when special events, including NIH activities, are held there. Ms. Hargrave said that Ms. Gries from the Department of Public Works and Transportation would address the engineering specific concerns in detail at the next meeting.

Members wondered if the County laws were strict enough to deter violations. Mr. Schofer said in some western states that all vehicles must stop when a pedestrian steps off the curb. Ms. Hargrave said Montgomery County laws are stricter than in many other jurisdictions. She explained that a crosswalk violation is not simply a ticket to be paid but a "must appear" requiring a court hearing which may result in up to a $500 fine and 6 months in jail. Ms. Rice noted that it is difficult to see pedestrians dressed in dark clothing and wondered if fabrics might be improved to include reflective material. Ms. Hargrave said that reminders are included in the tip sheet for pedestrians and bikers to wear reflective clothing and shoes, and for drivers to allow greater braking and stopping distance when approaching crosswalks. Mr. Oberlander suggested modeling a program that exists in the District where, in addition to stiff fines, violators are required to attend safety school for eight hours to learn how to walk and drive. Other members agreed that having safety campaigns, strict enforcement, and stiff fines would be helpful. Mr. Sawicki noted that during the winter snowplows created deposits that had obstructed the sidewalks. He said pedestrians had no choice but to walk in the street. Ms. Rice said NIH does a good job of removing snow from its sidewalks. Ms. Hargrave said that both the State and the County had been responsible for plowing the local highways and roads. Both departments are exploring methods to improve pedestrian safety for any similar problems which may occur in the future.

Ms. Hargrave concluded by passing out brochures. She said she is willing to appear at meetings at schools and civic associations and hopes members will contact her about their pedestrian safety concerns.

Review of May 22 Meeting Minutes
Dr. Gallagher asked members to review last month's meeting minutes. No corrections were voiced.

Members had asked about plans to count the number of non-employees who cross the NIH Campus to access Metro. Dr. Gallagher responded that an optimum time to conduct a count is near the end of summer after the fence is in place and the gates not yet installed. He said pedestrians would be easier to count as they funnel through the remaining open areas. Surveyors would be situated at each of these areas and counts taken in 15-minute segments at various times on unannounced selected days, and traffic curves plotted. He said there would be no need to interview pedestrians because NIH employees would be recognizable because they will be wearing an ID badge. He added that a turnstile count at the Metro station would also provide information about the numbers of people

Ms. Hildebrand thought pedestrians, even without a gate impeding entry, would avoid crossing the Campus after the fence is installed, because they would feel they should not enter the area. Jeanne Goldstein, Montgomery County Civic Federation, emphasized that it is the Council representative's job to relay information such as this to the neighbors they represent. Ms. Hoos said that notice should be given about the count taking place because she believes people have changed their transit patterns and are already avoiding crossing the Campus. Morton Goldman, Sc.D., Luxmanor Citizens Association, said in view of the rainy weather this spring his travel behavior had changed, and it had nothing to do with Metro or any factor other than the weather. Ms. Miller said people could be given a range of time instead of specific days for the survey. Dr. Gallagher said that rather than putting out bulletins, residents should share this information with their neighbors. Mr. Oberlander agreed that the method to get the word out should be through the civic associations, not by public announcement. Mr. Schofer thought having a finite number of places to intercept pedestrians would have only a slight impact on the count. Ms. Mazuzan said that August is supposed to be the biggest vacation month of the year and there would be fewer pedestrians than normal to count. Dr. Gallagher said the time would most likely be in September, because the construction of the fence had been delayed due by weather. Mr. Schofer said it would be important to develop a procedure and to teach surveyors what to do.

Dr. Gallagher said that he needs to conduct the survey in order to plan the number of shuttle buses that will carry passengers around the Campus perimeter after the gates are installed. Ms. Hildebrand agreed that a cooperative effort between volunteers from the residential areas and NIH surveyors, as suggested by Dr. Gallagher, would be a good way to proceed. She said she was willing to work with Dr. Gallagher to design procedures and plans for the survey. Ms. Miller asked to review the purposes of the survey. Dr. Gallagher said the purpose is to determine the number of non-employee pedestrians crossing the Campus to access Metro and to plan buses for the shuttle service NIH is providing.

NIAID Building 33 Complex Report and M-NCPPC Building 33 Complex Report
by Ronald Wilson, Division of Facilities Planning, ORF, NIH

Mr. Wilson provided copies of two documents for the members, including the NIAID Building 33 Complex Preliminary Site & Building Plans/Final Foundation Submission to the National Capital Planning Commission June 6, 2003; and Building 33 Complex NIH Campus, Bethesda, Maryland, National Capital Planning Commission Preliminary Site & Building Plans/Final Foundation Submission, with drawings including: site/landscaping plans, floor plans, elevations, site/building sections, and perspective renderings. These documents are copies of those submitted to M-NCPPC and NCPC.

Other Items
Mr. Schofer reported that although the police officers are controlling traffic on Rockville Pike at Wilson Drive, traffic is backing up beginning at 3:30 p.m. each workday. He feels the construction should be completed as soon as possible to alleviate this backup when cars are exiting NIH onto Rockville Pike. Dr. Gallagher said he would inquire about this situation.

Mr. Oberlander encouraged those concerned about Building 33 to attend the July 1, 2003, forum of the M-NCPPC and to provide comments to M-NCPPC staff before the July 17 referral meeting.

Ms. Hildebrand mentioned that she is listed in the CLC Member list and invited members to contact her regarding the plans for the pedestrian count.

The meeting was adjourned.

ACTION ITEMS

  • Dr. Gallagher will ask Mr. Giron to provide information about perimeter pedestrian walkway patrol on weekends.
  • Dr. Gallagher said he would find out about the significance of the line that crosses to the north side of West Cedar Lane shown on the small handout map.
  • Dr. Gallagher will verify whether construction vehicles will continue to enter Campus after the Center Drive gate is installed.
  • Dr. Gallagher said he would place information regarding questions posed by members in the next OCL Update.
  • Mr. Mitton said he would relay a question to Ms. Gries about procedures to expand an existing parking permit zone beyond that designated as a civic association area.
  • Ms. Hildebrand and Dr. Gallagher will design plans and procedures for a count of non-employee pedestrians who walk across Campus to the Metro station.
  • Mr. Robertson suggested initiating a truck pool for contractors. He pointed to the problem of cars exiting NIH onto Rockville Pike at Wilson Drive, resulting in traffic backing up beginning at 3:30 p.m. each workday. Dr. Gallagher said he would inquire about this situation.

Next CLC meeting: July 17, 2003.

ATTENDEES

CLC Members

  • Lorraine Bell, Palladian Partners, Inc.
  • Kimberly Cragg, OCL, OD, NIH
  • Tom Gallagher, OCL, OD, NIH
  • Morton Goldman, Sc.D., Luxmanor Citizens Association
  • Jeanne Goldstein, Montgomery County Civic Federation
  • Lesley Hildebrand, Huntington Terrace Citizens Association
  • Nancy Hoos, Sonoma Citizens Association
  • Debra Liverpool, YMCA-Bethesda
  • Marilyn Mazuzan, Town of Oakmont
  • Debbie Michaels, Glenbrook Village Homeowners Association
  • Ginny Miller, Wyngate Citizens Association
  • Walter Mitton, OCL, OD, NIH
  • George Oberlander, Huntington Parkway Citizens Association
  • Lucy Ozarin, M.D., Whitehall Condominium Association
  • Eleanor Rice, Locust Hill Civic Association
  • Tom Robertson, Parkwood Residents Association
  • Stephen Sawicki, Edgewood Glenwood Citizens Association
  • Ralph Schofer, Maplewood Citizens Association
  • Randy Schools, R&W, NIH
  • Stephanie Sechrist, NCPC
  • Deborah Snead, B-CCSC
  • J. Paul Van Nevel, NIH Alumni Association

Guests

  • Tom Hayden, DFP, ORF, NIH
  • Joan Kleinman, Office of Representative Chris Van Hollen
  • Ronald Wilson, DFP, ORF, NIH