Humanities,
November/December 2008
Volume 29, Number 6
“Promises,” from The Exchange Artist by Jane Kamensky Used by permission by Viking Penguin, a division of Penguin Group (USA).
Before the eighteenth century, speculator meant roughly the same thing as spectator. He (the speculator was male) was a contemplative type, a watcher. But by the time of the American Revolution, its meaning had begun to change. Writing in 1776, Adam Smith felt the need to define “what is called the trade of speculation” for his readers. The “speculative merchant,” he explained, “exercises no one regular, established, or well known branch of business. . . . He enters into every trade when he foresees that it is likely to be more than commonly profitable, and he quits it when he foresees that its profits are likely to return to the level of other trades.” “Sudden fortunes” and sudden losses were the equally likely results. No longer an observer, the speculator had become a doer—and sometimes an undoer. Smith called the speculative merchant a “bold adventurer.” Post-Revolutionary Americans had other names for him. Jobbers, jackals, and jockeys: these were but a few of the epithets leveled at the men who made fortunes out of paper. Their enemies, who were many, cast them as sharks, hawks, wolves: “artful” predators glutting themselves upon “honest” hardworking prey. They were diviners, reading entrails for a hint of what the future held, or alchemists, using thick smoke to mask the underlying hollowness of their promises. One Connecticut critic joked that the paper money speculators so loved should be emblazoned with the image of “Dr. Faustus paying the Devil for the black arts.”
These were dark assessments of the speculating bent, yet not wholly inaccurate ones. Paper men openly pursued private gain, which many of their countrymen deemed incompatible with the public good. And they chased fortune not by working up a sweat, but by playing hunches. Paper men bet on everything from banks to bridges. Paying pennies on the dollar, they bought up moribund Continentals and other public securities, holding them against the day the federal government would make good its debts. Such maneuvers defied the labor theory of value, which said that work made worth. Speculators had different ideas about the nature of value. Let others invest their toil; they would peddle confidence.
And confidence mattered. If they were gamblers, paper men were also believers in the unlikely new nation’s future greatness, and their faith—their bets—created capital that helped to make it so. It is no accident that so many of the country’s founders—George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin and Alexander Hamilton, Robert Morris and William Duer—were brazen speculators of one kind or another. Under their leadership, Americans developed a reputation as a speculating people. “Were I to characterize the United States,” said one British traveler who toured the country in the 1790s, “it should be by the appellation of the land of speculation.”
From Floods of the Tiber in Ancient Rome by Gregory S. Aldrete, pages 4-5. Copyright © The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007. Used by permission of The Johns Hopkins University Press. .
Lucius Cornelius Balbus dedicated a magnificent new stone theater in the southern section of the Campus Martius. He had earned a triumph for his victory over the Garamantes while serving as proconsul of Africa in 19 B.C., and the theater that bore his name was probably constructed using spoils of this campaign. It was a prime location, with ties both to Rome’s glorious past and to its vibrant present. . . . The grand inauguration of this theater, only the third in the city, would have been an important civic event, and Balbus accompanied the opening of the theater with spectacular public shows lasting several days. . . .
One note of discord marred Balbus’s moment of triumph, however. The Tiber rose from its banks during this time and inundated part of the city. Among the areas flooded was the site of Balbus’s theater, and indeed, Dio [Roman historian Cassius Dio] records that the waters were of such a considerable depth that Balbus was only able to enter his brand-new theater via boat. We can only imagine the inauguration ceremony that was held in the half-submerged theater, presumably with the celebrants clinging to the upper reaches of the cavea [theater seats given according to social hierarchy] while the boats that brought them bobbed about in the waters covering the stage. This apparently ignominious aspect of the ceremonies does not appear to have greatly detracted from Balbus’s glory, however, and seems to have been accepted by the participants as a matter of course.
|