Contract Management: Increased Use of Alaska Native Corporations' Special 8(a) Provisions Calls for Tailored Oversight

GAO-06-399 April 27, 2006
Highlights Page (PDF)   Full Report (PDF, 92 pages)   Full Report (HTML)   Accessible Text   Recommendations (HTML)

Summary

Alaska Native corporations (ANC) were created to settle land claims with Alaska Natives and foster economic development. In 1986, legislation passed that allowed ANCs to participate in the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program. Since then, Congress has extended special procurement advantages to 8(a) ANC firms, such as the ability to win sole-source contracts for any dollar amount. This report identifies (1) trends in the government's 8(a) contracting with ANC firms, (2) the reasons agencies have awarded 8(a) sole-source contracts to ANC firms and the facts and circumstances behind some of these contracts, and (3) how ANCs are using the 8(a) program. GAO also evaluated SBA's oversight of 8(a) ANC firms.

While representing a small amount of total federal procurement spending,8(a) obligations to firms owned by ANCs increased from $265 million in fiscal year 2000 to $1.1 billion in 2004. In fiscal year 2004, obligations to ANC firms represented 13 percent of total 8(a) dollars. Sole-source awards represented about 77 percent of 8(a) ANC obligations for the six procuring agencies that accounted for the vast majority of total ANC obligations over the 5-year period. These sole-source contracts can represent a broad range of services, as illustrated in GAO's contract file sample, which included contracts for construction in Brazil, training of security guards in Iraq, and information technology services in Washington, D.C. In general, acquisition officials at the agencies reviewed told GAO that the option of using ANC firms under the 8(a) program allows them to quickly, easily, and legally award contracts for any value. They also noted that these contracts help them meet small business goals. In reviewing selected large, sole-source 8(a) contracts awarded to ANC firms, GAO found that contracting officials had not always complied with certain requirements, such as notifying SBA of contract modifications and monitoring the percent of work that is subcontracted. ANCs use the 8(a) program to generate revenue with the goal of providing benefits to their shareholders. These benefits take many forms, including dividend payments, scholarships, internships, and support for elder shareholders. A detailed discussion of the benefits provided by the ANCs is included as appendix X of the report. Some ANCs are heavily reliant on the 8(a) program for revenues, while others approach the program as one of many revenue-generating opportunities. GAO found that some ANCs have increasingly made use of the congressionally authorized advantages afforded to them. One of the key practices is the creation of multiple 8(a) subsidiaries, sometimes in highly diversified lines of business. From fiscal year 1988 to 2005, ANC 8(a) subsidiaries increased from one subsidiary owned by one ANC to 154 subsidiaries owned by 49 ANCs. SBA, which is responsible for implementing the 8(a) program, has not tailored its policies and practices to account for ANCs' unique status and growth in the 8(a) program, even though SBA officials recognize that ANCs enter into more complex business relationships than other 8(a) participants. Areas where SBA's oversight has fallen short include: determining whether more than one subsidiary of the same ANC is generating a majority of its revenue in the same primary industry, consistently determining whether awards to 8(a) ANC firms have resulted in other small businesses losing contract opportunities, and ensuring that the partnerships between 8(a) ANC firms and large firms are functioning in the way they were intended. During our review, SBA officials agreed that improvements are needed and said they are planning to revise their regulations and policies.



Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Implemented" or "Not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director:
Team:
Phone:
William T. Woods
Government Accountability Office: Acquisition and Sourcing Management
(202) 512-4383


Recommendations for Executive Action


Recommendation: When revising relevant regulations and policies, the Administrator of SBA should ascertain and then clearly articulate in regulation how SBA will comply with existing law to determine whether and when one or more ANC firms are obtaining, or are likely to obtain, a substantial unfair competitive advantage in an industry.

Agency Affected: Small Business Administration

Status: In process

Comments: SBA states that it is conducting training for its business development specialists as well as federal agencies to ensure that all offer letters contain "previous procurement history" so that SBA will be able to track requirements that are offered and accepted for ANC participation. SBA states that this action will assist it in determining when one or more ANC firms are obtaining a substantial unfair competitive advantage in an industry.

Recommendation: When revising relevant regulations and policies, the Administrator of SBA should in regulation, specifically address SBA's role in monitoring ownership of ANC holding companies that manage 8(a) operations to ensure that the companies are wholly owned by the ANC and that any changes in ownership are reported to SBA.

Agency Affected: Small Business Administration

Status: In process

Comments: SBA stated that it has drafted proposed regulations that will address this issue. The proposed regulations are in the clearance process.

Recommendation: When revising relevant regulations and policies, the Administrator of SBA should collect information on ANCs' 8(a) participation as part of required overall 8(a) monitoring, to include tracking the primary revenue generators for 8(a) ANC firms to ensure that multiple subsidiaries under one ANC are not generating their revenue in the same primary industry.

Agency Affected: Small Business Administration

Status: In process

Comments: SBA said its Office of Business Development is building a business development management information system to electronically manage all aspects of the 8(a) program, including the potential to monitor ownership of ANC holding companies and manage operations of 8(a) ANC firms.

Recommendation: When revising relevant regulations and policies, the Administrator of SBA should revisit regulation that requires agencies to notify SBA of all contract modifications and consider establishing thresholds for notification, such as when new North American Industry Classification System codes are added to the contract or there is a certain percentage increase in the dollar value of the contract. Once notification criteria are determined, the Administrator of SBA should provide guidance to the agencies on when to notify SBA of contract modifications and scope changes.

Agency Affected: Small Business Administration

Status: In process

Comments: SBA said they understand GAO's recommendation as SBA "require agencies to notify SBA of all contract modifications and scope changes," however, we recommended that SBA re-visit whether notification of all modifications and scope changes was necessary and then, once criteria were determined, that it provide guidance to agencies on when to notify SBA.

Recommendation: When revising relevant regulations and policies, the Administrator of SBA should consistently determine whether other small businesses are losing contracting opportunities when awarding contracts through the 8(a) program to ANC firms.

Agency Affected: Small Business Administration

Status: In process

Comments: In a June 2008 response, SBA states that it reviewed data from the Federal Procurement Data System that does not indicate that other small firms are losing contracting opportunities to ANC-owned 8(a) firms. It cites the data that during fiscal year 2006, small businesses received $41.1 billion in contract awards while 8(a) firms received $12.6 billion. This information does not address our recommendation. SBA is also conducting training to ensure that the previous procurement history is included in agencies' offer letters to SBA, which will enable SBA to perform an adverse impact determination.

Recommendation: To improve practices pertaining to SBA's oversight, the Administrator of SBA should standardize approval letters for each 8(a) procurement to clearly assign accountability for monitoring of subcontracting and for notifying SBA of contract modifications.

Agency Affected: Small Business Administration

Status: In process

Comments: SBA states that it is preparing a procedural notice that will provide guidance to its field personnel on the acceptance of requirements into the 8(a) program. This notice will include a sample standardized acceptance letter.

Recommendation: To improve practices pertaining to SBA's oversight, the Administrator of SBA should tailor wording in approval letters to explain the basis for adverse impact determinations.

Agency Affected: Small Business Administration

Status: In process

Comments: SBA has not taken action to implement this recommendation.

Recommendation: To improve practices pertaining to SBA's oversight, the Administrator of SBA should clarify memorandums of understanding with procuring agencies to state that it is the agency contracting officer's responsibility to monitor compliance with the limitation on subcontracting clause.

Agency Affected: Small Business Administration

Status: Implemented

Comments: In August 2007, SBA provided a copy of a revised partnership agreement which has new language stating that the procuring agency is responsible for monitoring, oversight, and compliance with procurement laws and regulations governing 8(a) contracts between SBA and the agency. New provisions state that the contracting officer shall monitor compliance with applicable regulations including those in FAR Part 52, which includes the limitations on subcontracting clause.

Recommendation: To improve practices pertaining to SBA's oversight, the Administrator of SBA should evaluate staffing levels and training needed to effectively oversee ANC participation in the 8(a) program and take steps to allocate appropriate resources to the Alaska district office.

Agency Affected: Small Business Administration

Status: In process

Comments: SBA stated that it has hired a business development specialist in Alaska to oversee 8(a) ANC participation.

Recommendation: To improve practices pertaining to SBA's oversight, the Administrator of SBA should provide more training to agencies on the 8(a) program, specifically including a component on ANC 8(a) participants.

Agency Affected: Small Business Administration

Status: Implemented

Comments: 6/11/08: SBA hosted a procurement roundtable on October 31, 2007, targeting the 7 major federal agencies covered in our review (DOD, NASA, DOE, Interior, State, Transportation, and Homeland Security. On Dec. 7, 2007, SBA held two one-on-one procurement roundtable with DOD and NASA. On Feb. 7, 2008, SBA conducted nationwide training for procurement officials at DOD and on March 26, 2008, conducted training (which focused on 8(a) ANC-owned firms) for procurement officials at the Defense Contract Management Agency. On May 14, SBA held one-on-one procurement roundtables with Homeland Security and Energy, and plans to hold roundtables with State and Interior on June 26, 2008.

Recommendation: To ensure that agencies are properly overseeing ANC 8(a) contracts, the Secretaries of the Departments of Defense, Energy, Homeland Security, the Interior, State, and Transportation and the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration should work with SBA to develop guidance to agency contracting officers on how to comply with requirements of the 8(a) program such as limitations on subcontracting and notifying SBA of contract modifications, particularly when contracting with 8(a) ANC firms.

Agency Affected: Department of Homeland Security

Status: Implemented

Comments: DHS agreed with the recommendation and said it would partner with the Small Business Administration to ensure its contracting officers understand the 8(a) regulations. DHS has taken action in response to the recommendation. DHS issued "DHS Acquisition Alert 07/15," which issues guidance to contracting offices on proper use and issuance of ANC contracts. First, to ensure that an ANC-owned firm is in compliance with the FAR's limitations on subcontracting, the guidance instructs DHS contracting officers to require ANC-owned firms to report on the percentage of work that they are performing. Second, the guidance directs DHS contracting officers to coordinate with DHS small business offices and SBA, as appropriate. Third, the guidance requires that contracting offices receive the appropriate training, as required in the DHS/SBA partnering agreement.

Agency Affected: Department of Defense

Status: Implemented

Comments: DOD worked with SBA through participation in a roundtable discussion and by having DOD procurement officials receive SBA training on the 8(a) program. On October 31, 2007, a DOD official attended a procurement roundtable forum on 8(a) ANC corporations specifically to discuss the key issues raised in our report and to create a list of follow up actions to help address those issues. SBA agreed to provide more training, and the agencies involved in the roundtable discussion agreed to share procedures in place and best practices to monitor compliance with the limits on subcontracting and other issues identified in our report. Further, SBA reported providing training to procurement officials at DOD on 2/7/08 as part of the follow-up.

Agency Affected: Department of Energy

Status: Implemented

Comments: The Department of Energy (DOE) did not specifically comment on the recommendation in agency comments but an audit history report later provided by DOE showed management's concurrence. According to DOE, since May 2006 it has taken various actions in response to the recommendation--issuing guidance to contracting officers on oversight of ANC contracts, conducting in-house training on the 8(a) program, and reaching out to SBA regarding joint participation in training. Specifically, on May 24, 2006, DOE revised DOE Acquisition Letter AL-2005-08, regarding small business programs to remind contracting officers to use care in awarding and administering ANC contracts--to include notifying SBA of contract modifications and monitoring the limits on subcontracting. In July 2006--and in preparation for in-house training on the 8(a) program including contracting with ANC firms--DOE's Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy reached out to SBA regarding the status of the training recommendation directed to SBA. At that time, SBA stated it was in the process of developing an 8(a) training program for contracting officers and small businesses, but expressed interest in participating in the DOE in-house training. DOE's Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy later provided training on December 13, 2006.

Agency Affected: Department of the Interior

Status: Implemented

Comments: Interior agreed with the recommendation and on October 31, 2007, an Interior official participated in a procurement roundtable forum on 8(a) ANC corporations specifically to discuss the key issues raised in our report and to create a list of follow up actions to help address those issues. SBA agreed to provide more training, and the agencies involved in the roundtable discussion agreed to share procedures in place and best practices to monitor compliance with the limits on subcontracting and other issues identified in our report. Further, SBA reported a follow-up meeting to the roundtable discussion on June 26, 2008.

Agency Affected: Department of Transportation

Status: Implemented

Comments: Transportation agreed with the recommendation on October 31, 2007, transportation officials participated in a procurement roundtable forum on 8(a) ANC corporations specifically to discuss the key issues raised in our report and to create a list of follow up actions to help address those issues. SBA agreed to provide more training, and the agencies involved in the roundtable discussion agreed to share procedures in place and best practices to monitor compliance with the limits on subcontracting and other issues identified in our report.

Agency Affected: Department of State

Status: Implemented

Comments: State agreed with the recommendation and on October 31, 2007, a state official participated in a procurement roundtable forum on 8(a) ANC corporations specifically to discuss the key issues raised in our report and to create a list of follow up actions to help address those issues. SBA agreed to provide more training, and the agencies involved in the roundtable discussion agreed to share procedures in place and best practices to monitor compliance with the limits on subcontracting and other issues identified in our report. Further, SBA reported a follow-up meeting to the roundtable discussion on June 26, 2008.

Agency Affected: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Status: Implemented

Comments: On March 27, 2006, NASA provided us with a new SBA Partnership agreement and an analysis from an SBA attorney that shows how the new partnership agreement addresses this recommendation. Specifically, the new partnership agreement clearly states the responsibilities of SBA and NASA in overseeing the contracts. NASA agrees to inform its contracting officers and other warranted officials of their responsibilities concerning the partnership agreement and agrees to report all 8(a) contract awards, modifications, and options to SBA. Further, NASA agrees to ensure that all its contracting officers and small business specialists participate in 8(a) program contract training by SBA, which will include the limitations on subcontracting requirement and SBA's regulations as they pertain to 8(a) participants, including ANC 8(a) participants.