OVERSIGHT
HEARING ON RISING OIL PRICES
OPENING STATEMENT
Joseph Lieberman
March 24, 2000
Thank
you, Mr. Chairman, as always, and thanks for moving quickly to
convene this hearing on a topic that’s been of great concern
and frustration for me and many of my constituents in
Connecticut this winter, and probably will continue to impact
consumers and business throughout the country in the coming
months.
The
worst of the home heating oil panic has subsided, mostly because
temperatures have slacked off, although consumers are still
bearing too heavy a financial burden with oil prices at $27-$28
a barrel up from the optimal level of $18-$20 a barrel. Gasoline
prices, however, are still rising unabated. And because our
gasoline stocks are now at about the level they usually are on
Labor Day, several reputable analysts are predicting drivers
could be paying $2 to $2.50 a gallon at the pump as the spring
and summer vacation season approaches.
I
know Secretary Richardson has had some success in pressuring our
OPEC allies to step up oil production, and I’m grateful he’s
taken an aggressive role in trying to ease the squeeze. But we
won’t know how soon or by how much output will be raised until
the OPEC conference in Vienna on Monday.
I am
also heartened that the President - in his radio address last
Saturday - called for the creation of a regional home heating
oil reserve for the Northeast with an appropriate trigger that
would supply additional heating oil to the market during a
future shortage. Senator Dodd and I introduced a proposal along
these lines last month, so I look forward to working with the
administration on a bill that will give a sense of security to
consumers and businesses in the Northeast before next winter’s
home heating oil season.
But
none of this eases the frustration of being caught in this
all-too familiar and aggravating OPEC oil vise, yet again. So,
I hope we can discuss today how this great country of ours got
to this point of economic vulnerability.
I
have made plain my view that the first response to the oil
crunch would be for the administration to draw down from the
Strategic Petroleum Reserve to add to supply that will reduce
prices. This year’s oil price increases have been so extreme
that consumers and businesses are feeling the effects across the
board: increasing inflation and the likelihood of further hikes
in interest rates. I remain concerned that the administration
has not taken any steps to tap the reserve, but I am cheered
that some of our witnesses advocate this approach, or
alternately, a swap that would involve the release of reserve
oil now to refiners, in exchange for a promise to return
additional amounts of oil to the reserve in future. This plan
would lower oil prices by increasing oil supply in the SPR.
But
if we step back and look at the big picture, it’s easy to see
this price volatility and the threat it presents as a symptom of
a deeper, more long-term problem: our dependence on foreign oil.
By failing to provide our own citizens with energy alternatives,
we limit our options in times of national emergencies and
entrust our economic security to the whims of others. It is
imperative that we take concrete steps to wean ourselves from
foreign oil and develop a domestic infrastructure to deliver
reliable alternatives.
First,
we need to invest time, money, and energy in increasing our
domestic gas and oil production, and diversifying our energy mix
to include more solar energy, fuel cells, wind, and nuclear
power, and developing long-range strategies for harnessing these
additional energy sources.
Second,
in the context of the utility deregulation debate, Senator
Jeffords and I are cosponsoring legislation, the Clean Energy
Act, that would require utilities to use renewables for 2.5
percent of their power in 2000 and 20 percent by the year 2020.
We intend to offer this plan as an amendment to any deregulation
bill that comes before the Senate. I am happy to announce that
last month, the Senate passed another bill that Senators
Jeffords and I cosponsored, the National Sustainable Fuels and
Chemicals Act, which creates a bold R&D project to produce
fuels from plants and crop biomass. This legislation can
significantly increase the viability of domestic sources of
renewable energy.
Third,
we must take stock of the domestic energy market and evaluate
national and individual consumer decisions affecting our own
energy supply and efficiency. In some areas the results are
encouraging. Conservation measures taken by U.S. businesses have
significantly improved the efficiency of the overall economy.
During the crisis of the 1970s, nearly nine percent of our GDP
was spent on oil. That is down to three percent today. We can
and should build on this progress.
The
outlook is not so bright across all sectors of the economy.
Consider our driving habits. Over the last 30 years, vehicle
miles traveled have increased by 130 percent. And despite early
improvements in fuel efficiency, current standards have
stagnated and Congress has imposed a "freeze" on
raising -- or even studying the benefits of raising -- corporate
average fuel efficiency.
I
cannot state strongly enough the need to enhance our nation's
fuel efficiency - to conserve the resources that we do
have and to reduce our dependence on foreign suppliers - for the
sake of a stronger economy and a cleaner environment.
Finally,
it is critical that we rule out what are not viable solutions,
such as opening up protected spaces for domestic oil drilling.
Some have once again suggested that we target the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge as a suitable spot for drilling. The
U.S. Geological Survey estimates there are 3.2 billion barrels,
or less than a six-month supply, of commercially recoverable oil
in the ANWR. This means the refuge would never meet more than
two percent of our nation’s needs at any given time. The
answer to our foreign oil dependency is not to drill in and
damage our national treasures but to look to increasing our own
energy efficiency and finding alternative and renewable sources
of energy.
I
hope we can use this moment of dwindling oil supply and rising
prices to heed the warning signs, to think about our future
health and security as a nation, and to enact a new progressive
energy policy for this new century. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I
look forward to hearing from our guests. |