Status: The State's one pilot choice program for residential customers was discontinued as of October 31, 2001.
|
Overview: In April 2001, Wisconsin Gas Company, the largest local distribution company (LDC) in the State with about one- third of the residential market, decided not to continue its pilot program beyond October 31, 2001, because of declining marketer and customer participation. Only two suppliers were serving residential customers and four were serving commercial customers. The program began in November 1996 in the West Bend area and was later expanded to include customers in three more municipalities. In the last year of the program (November 2000 - October 2001), 1,838 residential customers were enrolled (7 percent of those eligible) and 1,647 commercial customers (5 percent of those eligible). According to the Wisconsin Public Utility Commission, instead of choice, some Wisconsin utilities are offering customers alternative services. For example, three utilities offer a fixed bill option and one utility offers a fixed price service. Both of these billing choices are intended to help customers budget and avoid price spikes, rather than as a way to save money, and are particularly popular with schools and municipalities.
|
EIA State Data: In 2004, Wisconsin had 1,569,719 residential and 151,906 commercial customers. They consumed 135 and 82 billion cubic feet of natural gas, respectively. In 1998, under the pilot program, 135 million cubic feet of residential gas was transported. The average prices paid for natural gas purchased from local distribution companies by residential and commercial customers in 2004 were $10.16 and $8.71 per thousand cubic feet, respectively.
|
Wisconsin: Legislative and Regulatory Actions on Retail Unbundling
Summary: In 1992, the Public Service Commission (PSC) of Wisconsin formed a workgroup to identify and investigate State regulatory options in light of the restructuring of the interstate natural gas industry. Based on the workgroup report and a staff study, the PSC endorsed unbundling of the State's gas industry when and as customer classes gain "effective market choice"and opened a docket in December 1995 to begin the process. Standards of conduct were developed to govern relationships between local distribution companies (LDCs) and affiliates, and new cost categories were established for rate case cost-of-service studies. In 1997, the PSC approved a case-by-case "workable competition" approach to assess whether effective competition exists in a particular market. It determined that consumer protection and reliable service policy issues would need to be addressed before deregulation could begin and ordered formation of six workgroups to consider (1) capacity policy, (2) marketer certification, (3) legislation issues, (4) price reporting, (5) market-based pricing for large-volume customers, and (6) consumer protection and essential service measures.
|
Regulatory and Legislative Actions
Regulatory
Actions |
4/01 |
Wisconsin Gas Files
to Discontinue GasAdvantage as of Oct 31, 2001. The company notified PSC that it would cancel its
pilot as of October 31, 2001, citing declining marketer interest and high
program expenses. Company claimed the plan was costing it $800,000 to $1.6
million a year to operate and could not be continued without charging its
customers substantial fees. The pilot program operated for 5 years and
allowed marketers to serve small customers, using algorithms to estimate
daily usage as opposed to using expensive telemetering
equipment. |
|
12/00 |
Wisconsin Public
Service Offers Gas Choice to Medium-Sized Customers. The approved program will use a telephone-based
meter reading system to monitor gas usage. Effective November 2002, the
program will be available to all customers who consume more than 15,000
therms (except those in Wisconsin Fuel & Light's territory), with
enrollment from Jan. 1, 2002 through March 1,
2002. |
|
4/00 |
GasAdvantage
Approved for Fifth Year. The
PSC approved continuation of Wisconsin Gas Company's customer choice
program for a fifth year, from 11/1/00 to
10/31/01. |
|
4/99 |
GasAdvantage
Approved for Fourth Year. The PSC approved continuation of Wisconsin Gas
Company's customer choice program for a fourth year, from 11/1/99 to
10/31/00. Residential customers in West Bend, Slinger, Hartford, and
Jackson are eligible (before only West Bend) with enrollment running from
7/1/99 to 9/30/99. The number of eligible commercial customers will be
expanded to include all in the ANR-served territory, and available
capacity will increase from 11,300 Dekatherms (Dth) to 22,000 Dth peak-day
service. |
|
6/98 |
GasAdvantage
Approved for Third Year. The PSC approved continuation of Wisconsin Gas
Company's customer choice program for a third year for customers in
certain zip codes in West Bend. Marketers provide billing and gas supply
services while Wisconsin Gas handles delivery and related services.
Currently enrolled customers may stay with their current marketer or
choose a new one. Once enrolled in the program, customers may not return
to Wisconsin Gas for supply service from 11/1/98 to
4/16/99. |
|
10/97 |
Consumer Protection
and Service Policy Issues. The PSC ordered formation of six workgroups to
consider (1) capacity policy, (2) marketer certification, (3) legislation
issues, (4) price reporting, (5) market-based pricing for large-volume
customers, and (6) consumer protection and essential service
measures. |
|
6/97 |
Competitive Market
Standards, PSC Order 05-GI-108, Phase III. In Phase III of
the restructuring docket, the PSC focused on how to determine whether a
market is sufficiently competitive to reduce or eliminate regulation and
to determine what barriers there are to effective competition. The PSC
approved a "workable competition" standard to be used in assessing whether
effective competition exists in a particular market. The standard would be
applied on a case-by-case basis and would be based on a reasonable number
of suppliers (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index of 2,000 to 2,500), low barriers
to competition, sufficient capacity, informed consumers, and "responsive"
suppliers. |
|
1/97 |
Standards of
Conduct Re Opportunity Sales, PSC Order 05-GI-108, Phase II. Standards were
developed to ensure that all opportunity sales are made on a
nondiscriminatory basis. Gas utilities must make monthly filings to the
PSC of all opportunity sales and indicate to the PSC and all interested
parties the guidelines used by the LDC when making long-term and
short-term opportunity sales. Standards were also developed to govern
relations between utilities and their affiliates to ensure that utilities
not disclose any customer-specific information and to prevent any cross
subsidies. |
|
12/95 |
Restructuring
Docket Opened, PSC Order 05-GI-108, Phase I. The PSC ordered
that LDCs must separate gas supply and capacity assets to make both
regulated and deregulated sales. LDCs can serve the deregulated market
only through a separate affiliate that has separate books, assets, and
personnel. LDCs can sell unutilized assets ("opportunity sales") to
mitigate total costs. Standards of conduct will be developed to govern
these sales. |
|
4/94 |
Staff Study of
Regulatory Reform. The PSC staff presented four market models for
restructuring the retail gas industry: (A) deregulate both gas commodity
and interstate capacity; (B) deregulate only gas commodity; (C) retain
regulation, but place increased reliance on market forces; or (D)
deregulate gas commodity and/or capacity as customers gain effective
market choice. The PSC selected Model D and those portions of Model C that
would unbundle regulated utility
services. |
|
9/93 |
Workgroup Report on
Natural Gas Regulation. In March 1992, the PSC established a workgroup of
utility personnel and PSC staff to identify and evaluate issues related to
regulatory reform in the State. The workgroup presented its report to the
PSC in September 1993 that presented three regulatory options: a
market-based strategy, a problem-solving strategy, and a planning
strategy. The PSC adopted the problem-solving strategy and formed a staff
study group to address restructuring issues raised in the report.
|
|